Month: March 2005

Several protesters attended the Bush forum; here one is being ejected.

Transcript of Friday’s Social Security forum at the Cannon Center:

THE PRESIDENT: Gosh, thanks for the warm welcome. It’s great to be here in Memphis, Tennessee. What a fabulous city you’ve got. (Applause.) One of our panelists here was saying that he got up at 4:30 a.m. this morning, trying to prepare some remarks for today, some interesting thoughts about Social Security. And I said, I’m glad it wasn’t you I heard at 4:30 a.m. — evidently there’s a basketball tournament here? (Laughter.) Some of the victorious fans were pleased with the results yesterday. (Applause.)

But I’m honored to be here. Memphis is a fabulous place. I wish Laura were with me today. (Applause.) She’s doing great, by the way. She’s obviously a patient woman, to be married to me. (Laughter.) She’s a wonderful mom, a fantastic wife and she’s doing a whale of a job as our country’s First Lady and I’m really proud of her. (Applause.)

We’re here to talk about Social Security. And I’ve got some other things on my mind I want to share with you, but before we talk about anything, I do want to thank Congressman Harold Ford for being here. I’m honored you’re here, Congressman. (Applause.) I appreciate your service to this great city. Just about every time I see him, he says to me, you need to get over to Memphis; we’ve got a great town full of fantastic people. Congressman, I’m honored you’re here.

Mayor A.C. Wharton, thank you for being here, I appreciate you coming. (Applause.) Thank you, sir. Got a lot of friends — I see the sheriff, he’s here. It’s always important to say hello — hi, Sheriff. Bishop G.E. Patterson is here. I’m honored you’re here, Bishop Patterson. Thank you for coming. (Applause.)

I want to thank a lot of the other friends of mine in the clergy who are here. You know, when we talk about the role of religion in society, it’s always important to emphasize that one of the things makes us great is that we separate the church and the state, that you’re equally American if you choose to worship or not worship. You’re equally American if you’re a Christian, Jew, Muslim or Sikh, whatever you choose to do. But one of the things I think is important is to include faith-based programs in the healing of hearts so that America can be a hopeful place. I do not fear the influence of faith in our society. I welcome faith. (Applause.)

And over the next four years, we’ll continue to work with the generals and colonels and sergeants and privates in the army of compassion, to help change our country one heart and one soul at a time. If you want to serve America, feed the hungry, find shelter for the homeless. If you want to do something patriotic, mentor a child and teach him or her how to read. If you want to make America a better place, put your arm around somebody hurt – who hurts and says, I love you, brother; or, I love you, sister, and I’m here to help you. No, America’s great strength is the hearts and soul of our citizens. And we must continue to rally that great strength to make America a better place. (Applause.)

I do want to talk a little bit about foreign policy. For the youngsters here, I hope you pay attention to what you’re seeing. What you’re seeing is an amazing moment in the history of freedom. (Applause.)

Because we acted to defend ourselves, we liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban. And millions of people voted — (applause) — voted in a presidential election. I met with one of the ministers, a female minister from Afghanistan the other day. She came into the Oval Office. She said she was looking forward to this moment to see me and Laura so that she could share with me her gr-great gratitude about the fact that she could live in a free society. And I said to her, I’m going to be traveling the country and I’m going to share your thanks with the American people.

So on behalf of this minister, this woman serving in the cabinet, this person who loves freedom, this person who has a chance to realize her dreams, she says thanks — thanks to the millions who now live in a free society. (Applause.)

I believe there will be a Palestinian democracy living side by side with Israel in peace. I believe that the actions taken by millions of Iraqi citizens in the face of incredible terrorist threats sent a clear signal to people around the world, that freedom is a beautiful thing. (Applause-hoots hollers.) The reason I bring this up is I want everybody to understand that we’ll defend our security; we’ll utilize our great military and our intelligence gathering capabilities to defend our country. We’re united in the United States — with the United States Congress in this objective. All of us in Washington understand that we have a solemn duty to protect our country. But in the long run, the way to defeat the ideologues of hate is to spread freedom and democracy. Freedom is moving around the world. Deep in everybody’s soul is the great desire to live in freedom, and the United States of America, working with friends and allies, must use our influence to continue the march of freedom for the sake of peace for generations to come.

Some good news in the economy last week. We added 262,000 new jobs last month. There are more people working in America than ever before in our nation’s history. (Applause.)

But there’s more work to do. I gave a speech in Columbus, Ohio, on Wednesday. I said, I reminded the folks that when I first got into office I sent an energy plan to the United States Congress. I was concerned then, like I am concerned now, about high gasoline prices; about our dependency upon foreign sources of energy. Congress has been debating this issue now for four years. It’s time to stop the rhetoric and stop the debate and get an energy plan to my desk that will encourage conservation, that will encourage renewable sources of energy, that will modernize the electricity grid, that will allow us to explore for oil and gas in environmentally friendly ways in the United States, that will make us less dependant on foreign sources of energy. (Applause.)

Bush sat on stage with kindred souls. (photo: Larry Kuzniewski)

But the main reason I’ve asked you to come and asked our panelists to appear with me is because I want to talk about Social Security. First of all, let me tell you, I understand that for years Social Security was the third rail of American politics. That meant if you grabbed a hold of it, you weren’t going to do well politically. If you talked about it, people would then say, well, really, what he’s going to do, he’s going to take away the checks of our seniors. But you’ll hear me describe the fact that I believe the system needs to be reformed, and I’ll tell you why. And I believe political people, when they see a problem, have a duty to address that problem and not to pass that problem on to future Presidents and future Congress. I ran for office to solve problems. (Applause.)

Some in Congress say, I wish you hadn’t have brought up the issue, it may cause us to make a tough vote. Others in Congress have said, well, we really don’t have any problem. That’s how democracy works. There is difference of opinion. And I’ve got mine, and I’m going to continue traveling our country until it becomes abundantly clear to the American people we have a problem and it’s abundantly clear to those who will receive Social Security checks that nothing is going to change. So I want to start by saying to the seniors here in Tennessee and folks listening on your television set that for you — for those of you receiving a check today, and for those of you, like me, near retirement, nothing is going to change for you. You will get your check. I don’t care what the TV ads say. I don’t care what the propaganda say. You’re going to get your check. (Applause.)

It’s important for people to understand that, because I fully understand a lot of people depend solely on their Social Security check for retirement. I know that. When I was the governor of Texas I knew that. And I know that as the President of the United States. A lot of people are depending upon the check, and the Social Security system is working for them. There is a safety net. The problem is the safety has got a hole in it for younger Americans. The safety net is secure for older Americans. (moderate Applause.)

Franklin Roosevelt did a good thing when he set up Social Security. It has worked. And so the discussion today is not to get rid of Social Security; the discussion today is to build on what Franklin Roosevelt put in place, to understand that things have changed since his presidency.

You see, Social Security worked for years because there were a lot of workers putting money into the system through their payroll taxes to pay for a limited number of beneficiaries. Matter of fact, in 1950, there were 16 workers per beneficiary. And the system works when it’s that way. For example, you’ll see on that chart, for somebody who is making $14,200 in benefits on an annual basis that means the worker will pay $900 to help that one person. Today, there is only 3.3 workers putting into the system. We got fewer workers paying per beneficiary. That obviously means costs are going up — and, particularly given this fact, baby boomers like me are getting ready to retire. Mine happens to be — my retirement age comes up in 2008, which is quite convenient. (Laughter and applause.)

The president used several charts in his presentation. (photo, Larry Kuzniewski)

I’ll be 62 years old in 2008. And there’s a lot like me. And there’s more coming. And we’re living longer than people during Franklin Roosevelt’s time and during the ’50s. And we’ve been promised greater benefits than the previous generations. So think about this: fewer workers paying into the system — 3.3 per beneficiary now, soon to be 2 workers per beneficiary — paying for a lot of baby boomers, like me, who have been promised greater benefits and we’re living longer. And that’s the math.

That’s why I say there’s a hole in the safety net. And that hole exists for the people coming up, because that system can’t sustain itself. It you look at this chart over here, you’ll see that in 2018, more money is coming — going out of the system than coming in.

PROTESTER: NO!

THE PRESIDENT: More money in 2020, 2029, $200 billion a year will be going out of the system than coming in.

PROTESTER: All due respect Mr. President thatÕs notÉ [minor hubbub]

THE PRESIDENT: More money in ’37 will be coming out of the system, coming every year, it gets worse and worse and worse because there are baby boomers like me, more of us than ever before, drawing benefit — larger benefits and living longer.

So we have a problem for a younger generation. Imagine somebody who’s looking at this chart. They’re going to say, what are you going to do about it, Mr. President? What are you going to do about it? And so I stood up in front of the Congress and said, we have a problem. And I think I was the first President ever to say, all options are on the table. I said there’s been some interesting ideas. Congressman Tim Penny, when he was a Democrat Congressman from Minnesota, put some interesting ideas on the table. President Clinton, my predecessor, put some interesting ideas on the table. Democrat Govern-uh-Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan from New York put some interesting ideas on the table.

I have an obligation to say to people from both parties, let’s fix this permanently. Let’s don’t slap a band-aid on the problem. Let us fix it permanently and all ideas, bring them forward — and I’m interested in listening. There will be no political retribution when you put an idea on the table. As a matter of fact, you will get kudos. In Washington, D.C., there’s still partisan talk. There is still people saying, well, I’m not so sure I want to get involved. My call to people from both political parties is now is the time to put aside our political differences and focus on solving this problem for generations of Americans to come. (Heavy Applause.)

I do want to talk about an interesting idea that I have discussed with others. Now, I have an obligation to participate in the dialogue. I don’t get to write the legislation, by the way. Members of the Senate and the House will write the legislation. But I have an Ð I-I-I-I’ve got some ideas that I-I’d like for people to consider, and one of them is to allow younger workers to take some of their own money and set it aside in a personal retirement account, [hubbub as protester is hauled out] a savings account. (Applause.)

And let me tell you why I like the idea. Here’s why I like the idea. First of all, we’ll discuss — and Congressman Penny will discuss this — about the notion of compounding rate of interest. That means if you’re able to get a reasonable rate of return on your money, then over time, it grows exponentially. In other words, if you’re able to set aside some of your own money in a conservative mix of stocks and bonds, you’ll get a better rate of return on that money than you would on the rate of return that the government gets for you. And it’s that difference that, over time, compounds.

So take, for example, a person making $35,000 a year over his or her lifetime, and if he or she were allowed to set aside 4 percent of the payroll tax in a personal savings account, by the time he or she retired, there will be $250,000 as a part of the retirement system. That’s what compounding rate of interest does. (Applause.)

People say, well, I’m not so sure I know how to invest. You know, there’s kind of this notion that there is an investor class in America. That sounds a little limited to me, that only a certain number — certain type of person can invest. I don’t subscribe to that notion. I believe everybody has got — should have the opportunity to invest, and I believe everybody can invest. (Applause.)

Now, when you say personal account, you can’t take the money and put it in the lottery. (Laughter.) You’ve got a lottery in Tennessee? Right down the road. Well, you can’t do that. There would be a prescribed set of types of stocks and bonds. Obviously, we’re not going to let people take their money and gamble it out. And we’ve done this before. See, this isn’t new ground. After all, a lot of people invest their own money in 401(k)s. There’s an investor class growing way beyond the concepts of the investor class. In other words, Defined Contributions Plans are spreading out all over America. People are used to this concept. Federal employees get to do this through the Federal Employee Thrift Savings Plan. In other words, the federal government has said to employees, hey, you get to invest some of your own money, if you choose, in a conservative mix of stocks and bonds.

So this concept has been around. We’re not — this is an interesting — this isn’t something brand new. This is an idea that ought to happen for Social Security, as well as other retirement — as it happened in other retirement funds.

PROTESTER: NOÉ you canÕt!

THE PRESIDENT: Thirdly, we want people owning something. I love the fact that more people now own their home than ever before in our nation’s history. (Applause.) I like the fact when there are more entrepreneurs from all walks of life; people saying, I own my own business. That’s the important part. How about letting people own a stake of the future of the country by having the ownership in their own retirement plan? And that’s what we’re talking about: ownership. (Applause.)

Finally, I like the idea of being — somebody being able to accumulate assets and pass it on to their heirs. Provides for stability in society. Now, ownership ought not to be limited. It ought to be spread around in our society.

And, finally, there’s a macroeconomic benefit when more people save, like they would be doing through their personal accounts. It provides more capital for investment. And capital is necessary for the expansion of small business. Capital helps fuelsÑhelps fuel the entrepreneurial spirit of America. The more savings, the more capital, the more jobs.

So this is an idea that I want Congress to take a look at, in the spirit of all ideas ought to be put on the table. I’m looking forward to the discussions with members of both political parties. I’ve got a lot of work to do in the meantime. I’m going to Louisiana after this. Next week, I’ll be traveling down to Florida, checking on the brother. (Laughter.) And then I’m going to be going out — then I’ll be going out west. And I’m going to campaign for Social Security, because I told you earlier, we have a duty in Congress to do something about this before it becomes too late, before we saddle an entire generation with a problem we cannot solve. (Applause.)

Ready to go? I want to thank Tim Penny for being here. Elected to the United States from Minnesota. Knows the subject really well. Congressman, thanks for coming. I’m proud you’re here. Thanks for joining us. (Applause.)

EX-CONGRESSMAN PENNY: Mr. President, thank you, first, for putting this issue on top of the agenda because it is an urgent issue, and it’s one that needs to be addressed sooner than later. Doing nothing is not an option. An economic advisor to a previous president once said Òsomething that is unsustainable eventually will stop. Something that is unsustainable will eventually will stop. And as youÕve shown with this chart over here the trend we are on really is unsustainable. Now hereÕs my concern: I voted for some social security tax increases back in 1983 as a 3o year old congressman in his first year in Congress. And that;s the way weÕve addressed it the issue in the past. WeÕve raised payroll taxes 24 times since this program was created. When it was first created it was 2% od payroll (unintel)É now its almost almost…[UNINTELLIGIBLE PORTION OF TAPE)

THE PRESIDENT: I And I really want to thank Tim. He’s been very active in this issue for a long period of time. Occasionally he’s able to make time to join the presidential road show to take this issue to the people, and he adds a lot of class to the road show .

(Laughter.) He’s going to down to Louisiana with me a little later on today. So thanks for being here, Tim.

We’re going to start with Mary Hines from — where you live, Mary?

MS. HINES: I live in Hickory Withe, Tennessee.

THE PRESIDENT: Hickory Withe, that’s interesting.

MS. HINES: A very small community. We’re unincorporated. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Sounds like the town came. (Laughter.) How many people live there?

MS. HINES: About two or three thousand.

THE PRESIDENT: Four times bigger than Crawford. (Laughter.) Thanks for joining us.

MS. HINES: Thank you, I’m glad to be here.

THE PRESIDENT: Are you receiving any Social Security?

MS. HINES: Yes, I am. I’ve worked for 40 years as a secretary. My husband worked 40 years for DuPont. And we’re both drawing Social Security.

THE PRESIDENT: And is it important to you?

MS. HINES: It is very important. It is part of our retirement plan.

THE PRESIDENT:Okay. Are you worried about the reforms taking it away from you?

MS. HINES: No, in fact, we — as we understand it, this is — the reforms will not affect us. However, my children — like you — are in the baby boomer era when they retire. So this will affect them somewhat. But, basically, it will affect my grandchildren and my great grandchildren. So it’s some —

THE PRESIDENT: No, I appreciate — sorry to interrupt. Now that I have, I better say something. (Laughter.) She has a vital point. There are a lot of grandmothers who are justifiably concerned about what Social Security means to their grandchildren. This is a generation where Social Security has worked. She and her husband are getting help from the Social Security system. After all, it’s their money coming back to them.

And I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard from people once we have assured citizens that nothing changes for them, that, what are you going to do about my grandchildren. This is a generational issue. It is an issue that is very important for members of Congress to understand that a lot of grand-folk-parents care deeply about not only their own security, but once they’re — once they’re assured, they care deeply about the security of their grandchildren. I want to thank you for sharing that with us. (Applause.) Anything else you want to —

MS. HINES: Well, I look at your chart over here, and I would like to thank those workers who are helping pay my Social Security right now.

THE PRESIDENT: That’s right. (Laughter.) That would be me and a lot of other people. (Applause.) Good news is, they’re going to keep paying, and you’ll keep getting your check.

Let me introÉ Beverly Peterson is with us. She’s got a very interesting story. Ready to go? You look like you’re ready to go. (Laughter.)

(GAP IN TAPE)

PETERSON: I wrote a letter to President Bush. I was concerned about the Social Security Benefit. I had an incident that happened 18 years ago. My husband passed away at the age of 49. I went to the Social Security office and was told that I would receive ONE benefit and that was the death benefit of $250. I would receive no other benefit and my two other children who were in college at the time would not receive one. I was told that I was Òin a gray area.Ó I was too young. Well, my husband paid into Social Security from the time he was 16 years old. I work full time and part time and also put into the Social Security system When it comes time for me to retire I will receive one or the other, whichever is greater of the two. The other is absorbed back into the system. We will never see it.

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, let me — thank you for sharing that with us. What Beverly is saying is, is that she was too young for the survivor benefits and therefore the money that he put into the system — “he” being the husband — there was nothing there. And because she has contributed to the Social Security system, when she retires, you’ll get the benefits because of your check, because of not or because of your contributions, not because of your husband’s contributions.

Personal accounts — think about what personal accounts would have done for Beverly: the husband works, puts money aside since 16 years old. What age was he when he passed away?

MS. PETERSON: Forty-nine.

THE PRESIDENT: Forty-nine years old, so that’s 33 years of compounding rate of interest, 33 years of that money set aside would grow. And when he passed away, there is an asset base for Beverly that she gets, and she can live on it, it’ll help her transition to her days of retirement. In other words, that’s one of the benefits of being able to accumulate your own assets that, as Tim said, you call your own. And when it’s your own asset, you can pass it on to whomever you choose.

PROTESTER: NO, NO!

THE PRESIDENT: The system is an important system today, but it has got holes in the safety net. And one of the holes in the safety net is a widow like Beverly did not have any assets when her husband passed away.

Thank you for sharing that story with us.(Applause.)

Pastor Andrew Jackson. Welcome, Pastor Jackson.

PASTOR JACKSON: Thank you, Mr. President. I’m delighted to be here. Thanks for the invitation.

One of President Bush’s guests was Rev. Jackson of Faith Temple Church. (photo, Larry Kuzniewski)

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’re glad you’re here. You pastor what church, sir?

PASTOR JACKSON: Faith Temple Church of God and Christ. My bishop is Bishop G.E. Patterson and —

THE PRESIDENT: Bishop Patterson, a fine man. (Applause.) Good. How’s the congregation doing?

PASTOR JACKSON: Doing quite well. It’s kind of like the city bus — we have some getting on and some getting off. (Laughter and applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: The difference in your case is, the fare is free. (Laughter.)

PASTOR JACKSON: True.

THE PRESIDENT: Tell me why you’re here. Thanks for coming, I’m honored. I want to hear your views on Social Security.(GAP IN TAPE)

Thank yo for coming up with this idea. I only wish 50 years ago when I started paying Social Security that this concept had been available. Of course I would be able to draw a little more money than IÕm drawing now. IÕve been drawing Social Security for the last four years. But IÕm not retired. I have 18 grandchildren. This morning coming hear I heard on the news that President Bush is trying to take away most of our Social Security. Of course I know thatÕs not what youÕre trying to do but thatÕs the myth that has been circulating around.

THE PRESIDENT: That’s called political propaganda.

PASTOR JACKSON: Oh, political — okay,propaganda. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: That’s what they said when I ran for President in 2000. I actually brought the issue up. They said, if he gets elected, he’s going to take away your check. It didn’t happen. Everybody got their checks. That’s why propaganda — that’s empty. That means —

PASTOR JACKSON: It’s empty.

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, there’s no truth to it. Go ahead.

PASTOR JACKSON: IÕm concerned about my grandchildren and great grandchildren though I know this wonÕt effect me I will still draw my social Security until I die. Of course as my wife go with me thatÕs the end of it. Unlike this plan. If my grandchildren come along and they buy into this set aside a small percentage of their Social Security which they are paying anyway will go into a persomal private account. When they cease to exist here that private account will be passed on down to their children. So I think itÕs a great plan. IÕm for it. IÕm pushing it everywhere I go. IÕm talking about it in my church.

THE PRESIDENT: See, here’s what I like. I like the idea that the Pastor is thinking about generations to come. And he said, I’m worried about my grandchildren, my great-grandchildren, and I hope there’s a system that develops that encourages asset accumulation so generation-to-generation assets can be passed on. That hasn’t happened for many in our history. No, that hasn’t been the case throughout the history of the United States. We haven’t encouraged asset formulation. There hasn’t been wealth passed from one generation to the next in certain parts of our society. That’s just the truth. And it seems like to me that it makes sense for us to come together and encourage a plan that does just that, that provides continuity from one generation to the next when it comes to assets. We want people owning something. I don’t care where they’re from, what political party they associate with, what neighborhood they live in. The more people own something, the better off America is, and the ability to pass assets from one generation to the next is an important part of our legacy. (Applause.)

Let me tell you one other thing, and then we’ve got two other panelists here. This system — and I want to work with members of both parties to make sure this system takes care of our poorer workers. We can design the benefit structure for that which exists in a way that recognizes some people work all their life and will have to live below the poverty level upon retirement. And we don’t want that in America. There are ways to make sure this system provides a solid safety net.

Tim [Penney]understands that. Harold [Ford] understands that. All of us can work on this system. So I want to assure you, Pastor, that not only will the system encourage asset accumulation, but we want to make sure that whatever Social Security system exists, that when we permanently fix it, that people are given a true safety net,the whole is fixed in the safety net, and that there is a safety net for retirees. (Applause.)

Harry Summer. Harry, thanks for coming.

MR. SUMMER: Thank you, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: I understand you were a professor at one time.

(LONG GAP IN TAPE)

HE PRESIDENT: You know, somebody told me one time — they took a poll amongst 20-year-olders, and 20-year-old people said they thought it was more likely they’d see a UFO than get a Social Security check. (Laughter.) Interesting dynamic, isn’t it? A lot of people say 20-year-olds don’t care about the issues. And part of my job is to make sure that they understand the facts, because once people realize — once the seniors realize nothing is going to change, once Congress realizes there are a lot of grandfathers wondering about their granddaughters and their future, once 20-year-olders and 30-year-olders start to say, wait a minute, now this is a problem, what are you going to do about it? Those are the dynamics to get something done.

I presume you expect Congress to get something done now, before it’s too late.

MS. SIEGFRIED [SUMMERÕs granddaughter]: Yes.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, listen, I want to thank our panelists for coming. I thought this was an interesting dialogue. (Applause.) I want to thank you all for giving us a chance to come report about this important issue. I’m looking forward to working with Congress. I expect there to be a civil dialogue and honest debate. All ideas should be on the table. The American people are going to influence the outcome of this debate.

I want to thank the good people of Memphis for letting me come by and visit with you about it. I want to assure you, I will continue traveling our country, asking people to be involved, getting people to write their congressmen and senators to say, get rid of the partisanship, sit down at the table and modernize this system for generations to come.

God bless, and thanks for coming. (Heavy Applause.)

Want to respond? Send us an email here.

Scenes From President Bush’s Thursday-Night Arrival

Local GOP group awaits the president, here for forum on Social Security Friday. Group includes District Attorney General Bill Gibbons, 2000 and 2004 Bush Tennessee chair David Kustoff, State House minority leader Tre Hargett, Sheriff Mark Luttrell.

Air Force One heads for a landing.

Air Force One at rest.

The president deplanes.

Bush is greeted by the local GOP luminaries, preparatory to heading to overnight lodging at The Peabody.

Want to respond? Send us an email here.

TALES OF TWO WOMEN

It is well established, via a famous cliché, that politics ain’t beanbag.

The latest evidence of that was delivered last Friday night on WMC-TV Channel 5, when reporter Darrell Phillips reported on, of all things, a memoir written by the daughter of an active local political candidate.

The book, entitled The Prodigal Daughter and published locally by Reginald Martin Books, is by Desiree Bowers, whose mother, state representative Kathryn Bowers, is a candidate for the District 33 state Senate seat recently vacated by Roscoe Dixon, now an aide to Shelby County mayor A C Wharton.

Stated simply, the book, which purports to be the author’s account of her spiritual regeneration, presents Representative Bowers as a negligent mother preoccupied with “saving the world.” The book asserts that the senior Bowers, though a Catholic, arranged for the author to have at least one abortion, which came when the younger Bowers was only 13 and already embarked on a career of prostitution. Her mother was heavily engaged in civil and community affairs at the time.

Bowers has several opponents in the March 24th Democratic primary, which is very probably going to be the decisive vote, rather than the special general election on May 10th. District 33, spreading across the southern edge of Shelby County, is predominantly black and overwhelmingly Democratic. That fact creates a steep climb indeed for the four Republicans and two independents also running.

Practically speaking, the Democratic primary race is considered as being between Shelby County Commission chairman Michael Hooks and Bowers, who made it clear Saturday, after she had spoken briefly before the Germantown Democratic Club, that she suspected foul play on the part of her major opponent.

Pleading another commitment, Bowers had not been present Friday night for a candidate forum at Methodist Hospital South one that got started less than an hour after Phillips told his tale on the 6 p.m. news.

One of the questions fielded by the four candidates at that forum was whether the details of a candidate’s private life should have a bearing on their fitness for office or should figure in election campaigns. The four candidates on hand — Republicans Barry Sterling and Jason Hernandez, independent Ian Randolph, and Hooks — all answered in the affirmative on both counts. (Absent were Bowers, Republicans Mary Ann Chaney McNeil and Mary Lynn Flood, and independent Mary Taylor Shelby.)

The public had a “right to know,” said Sterling. Hernandez said a candidate was obliged to be a “role model” and added that private behavior was an indicator of public performance. Randolph said office-holders should reflect the values of their community.

For his part, Hooks, who made an indirect reference to his conviction some years ago on a drug charge and subsequent rehabilitation, proclaimed his life “an open book” and said every candidate’s should be.

After the Channel 5 newscast, which was followed by a posting on Phillips’ personal blog, Bowers evidently made the judgment that, now that her daughter’s book and her own life had been opened to public scrutiny, she needed to hit the issue head on.

Accordingly, she brought the matter up when she was asked to say a few words at a Saturday morning meeting of the Germantown Democrats. Asking for members’ prayers in a difficult time, Bowers said she intended to handle the issue of the book with “love and forgiveness” and said her chief concerns were with the “children” — meaning her own, including Desiree, and several grandchildren and great grandchildren.

Acknowledging that at various times she may in fact have appeared to be “trying to save the world,” Bowers then segued into some of her legislative concerns –notably her determination to resist Governor Phil Bredesen’s proposed eliminations of some 323,000 Tennesseans from the TennCare rolls. “Health care and economic development: That’s what I do,” she concluded.

Asked about her daughter’s book afterward, Bowers said she hadn’t read it but had owned a copy since its publication, roughly a year ago. “Of course,” she answered, when asked if she thought the surfacing of the issue now was politically inspired.

Without specifying what parts of the book she might mean, Bowers said it was “not necessarily all nonfiction,” though she did acknowledge that she had arranged an abortion when Desiree Bowers had become pregnant at the age of 13 and “didn’t know who the father was.”

No reconciliation was necessary with her daughter, said Bowers, because “we never fell out” in the first place. “But she has made her choices, and I have made mine.”

Representative Bowers said she had been up “all night long” following Friday night’s telecast, receiving phone calls from well-wishers. Certainly, there was nothing stinted about the hand she got from the Germantown members, who roundly applauded her remarks.

Madame Senator?

It’s no secret that 9th District U.S. representative Harold Ford is the odds-on favorite to be the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in 2006 should he choose to run. But it won’t be a free ride. He can expect determined opposition from a Nashville-area legislator and self-styled “straight shooter” who proudly says she is used to running hard in contested elections and modestly avers, “I’ve won a few.”

This is state senator Rosalind Kurita of Clarksville, the Middle Tennessee city, just north of Nashville, which includes a portion of the Fort Campbell (Ky.) military complex and numerous military personnel among its residents. She has just begun her third term as senator from District 22 (Cheatham, Houston, and Montgomery counties). Says the 57-year-old Kurita: “It’s a conservative district that Bush won. I keep turning away Republican challengers, and I beat a Republican incumbent eight years ago to get in.” She adds: “Tennessee Democrats are Bubbas. I’m a Bubba!”

As one proof of that, Kurita cites her prowess in skeet-shooting, a pastime in which she competes and has won several awards. Several years ago she accepted a challenge to a one-on-one match from the chief state lobbyist of the National Rifle Association. She won — a fact that didn’t keep her from getting the NRA’s endorsement at election time.

She expects to have it in the future too, and that’s one of the facts that she says will make her candidacy amenable to Tennesseans at large. In her reelection campaign last year, she used a TV ad that showed her firing her modified Browning shotgun on the skeet range and featured her stands in opposition to a state income tax, partial birth abortion, and gay marriage. She also supports the Bush administration’s policy on Iraq. On Social Security, though, she thinks the president has created an artificial crisis and finds his proposals for privatization “frightening.”

“The Republicans have thrown everything at me that they could, and I’ve always been able to raise enough money to take ’em on,” says Kurita, a former Montgomery County commissioner who vows to have enough on hand to handle both the primary race and, if successful, the general election contest.

Kurita, a former nurse and mother of three whose husband is a pediatrician, grew up in Midland, Texas, where she was a schoolmate of Laura Bush and her father was the local Republican chairman. Why did she change parties? “Republicans have to be of one mind and walk with one step. Democrats let you be who you want to be,” she says.

Though the senator is a slightly built woman, she is a figure to be reckoned with in legislative councils. After a single-handed struggle of some years, she managed last year to get smoking banned outright in the state Capitol, including the smokers’ last bastions of the House and Senate chambers.

“She doesn’t take no for an answer very easily,” notes Senate Democratic leader Jim Kyle of Memphis.

“I don’t expect to have to,” she says about the 2006 election.