Categories
News News Feature

MEMPHIS BANK ROBBERIES ON THE DECLINE

In a recent AP article Scott Nowinski, an FBI representative said that bank robberies in the state of Tennessee are on the rise in comparison to 2000. Here in Memphis, where two separate fatalities have occurred in the last year during bank robberies, those statistics seem true.

According to Steve Anthony, the FBI supervisory special agent for violent crimes in the West Tennessee area and member of a special multi-county and city violent crime task force, those statistics are not the case in Memphis.

“In the Memphis Metropolitan area, actually since 1997, we have had a steady decrease in bank robberies,” says Anthony. “From 90 bank robberies in 1997 to 62 in 1998, to 50 in 1999, to 41 last year. As of right now we’ve had 21. This time last year we had 30. We’re down another 30 percent right now.”

Anthony attributes the drop to a number of factors. “First and foremost is the community involvement,” he says. “That receives the most credit, in particular the Crimestoppers unit. Especially with the violent robberies, people are not going to stand and let others be victim to these kinds of senseless acts.”

Also, Anthony and his group works closely with area banks “The banking community has been very cooperative. We train some with them and we discuss security matters and such.” However, Anthony does emphasize that while the FBI can make suggestions to be banks, “they are a business. All we can do is to recommend to make sure they have good cameras, good quality video if that is what they are going to do, preferably 35 millimeters. We ask that they have alarms and other security devices such as dye packs. All we can do is meet regularly and suggest.”

Anthony also attributes the lowering robbery rate to his group. “In some small way, we give credit to the agency and the task force that had foresight in 1997, when the robberies hit a peak,” Anthony says. “The heads of the Memphis police department and the Shelby County sheriff’s department, and now the Collierville police department came up with a unified front. One group of investigators that work together day in and day out that can handle the leads. The credit goes around.”

The most salient affect of the task force is in catching the criminals. Anthony says that its efforts led to the quick capture of the most recent robbers, William O. Maxwell, Terrance Johnson, Jr., and Aaron Haynes, who during their July 23 robbery of a local Union Planters left bank guard James Earl Jones with a bullet wound in the face and bank customer Sheryl White dead. “It is a terrible incident,” Anthony says. “It rallied our task force, it rallied the community. It pushed us forward to say that we’re not going to let this happen. I have been doing this for many years and whenever you hear over your radio that shots have been fired and someone has been injured. It’s hard to describe. It’s a tragic thing. You’re pumped up inside. In the last case, the task force literally worked 24 hours a day until that was solved in two days. We’re going to continue to respond like that and we’re going to do our best not to rest until the people responsible are put behind bars.”

Still, Anthony acknowledges that such high profile crimes scare customers and bank personnel alike. He says “When you have an instant when on September 18 of last year a 79 year old lady is murdered senselessly and when you have this past July 23 when a guard is shot in the face and a customer is killed, it does come to the forefront that bank robbery, by its very essence, is a violent crime. Bad things tend to happen when a robbery has been committed.”

And despite Memphis’ lower than average robbery statistics, “We are, unfortunately, the only city where a customer have been killed in a bank for the last two years. We’re not happy with that at all. When you have an instant like that it raises the concern for safety and what we are doing to catch these people and hopefully help prevent the robberies.”

Categories
News The Fly-By

PARANOIA DEPARTMENT

With reality programming and talk shows showing no signs of decreased
popularity, it’s becoming more and more obvious that Andy Warhol was correct
when he declared that in the future everyone will be famous for 15 minutes.
But even the great Warhol could not have guessed that we’d squander that
quarter-hour wagging our fingers in the air and shouting, “No you di-unt, NO
YOU DI-UNT!” It’s a Springer world out there, kiddos, and it’s almost
impossible to turn around without being reminded that somewhere, somehow
somebody we love is doing us like a dog. Malls carry spy equipment to “check
up” on ourloved ones. Billboards for DNA testing ask, “Who’s the real daddy?”
Now an advertising campaign on MATA buses for AIDS testing asks, “Your boo is
doing you…and who?” No you di-unt, MATA, NO YOU DI-UNT!

Categories
News News Feature

McCALLA’S ODYSSEY

Seventeen years and five days from what must have been the lowest day of his professional life, U.S. District Judge Jon McCalla and I shared a few anxious hours together in the waiting room of the maternity ward at Baptist Hospital East. He was awaiting the birth of a daughter, I a son.

Whatever your station in life, an experience like that binds you in your common humanity, if only for a short time. He was a lawyer, I was a reporter. For those few hours we were just two nervous, happy guys.

I knew McCalla slightly then and would come to know him better over the years as a federal judge, a handball player at the YMCA, and a lunchtime companion at the Wolf River Society. I have only rarely seen him on the bench. But then the appellate judges who forced him to accept a six-month respite and behavioral counseling probably havenÕt seen him on the handball court, either. Or in the waiting room.

The punishment is puzzling, even if McCalla did not officially dispute the facts of the complaints against him, which came mainly from lawyers at the firm of Burch Porter and Johnson.The damning transcripts that were made public and published in the newspaper did not clarify things much.

They showed McCalla berating an attorney for what he saw as a lack of preparedness. Not once or twice, but again and again. When a lawyer does it in court, itÕs called badgering the witness. Counsel will refrain . . . blah blah blah.

McCalla is punctual on the bench, maybe compulsively so. Well, some attorneys are tardy, long-winded, and obtuse, maybe chronically so.

McCalla is snippy and sarcastic at times. Maybe too much so. Some lawyers, on the other hand, are prima-donnas, maybe pathologically so.

In short, Judge McCalla sometimes gave lawyers a horse doctorÕs dose of their own medicine. In 20 years of covering trials on and off, it still amazes me that witnesses never leap from the dock to strangle the attorneys who badger them, humiliate them, embarrass them, or fail to give them competent counsel. I donÕt know how they sit there and take it. I believe this thought may have crossed McCallaÕs mind as well.

The writer Jesse Stuart wrote that Òthe law is a powerful thing.Ó Powerful enough, in StuartÕs story, to make a Kentucky redneck send his grandson to school. In our town, the law is powerful enough to get to the bottom of a football recruiting scandal or a business scam or a custody fight or a murder. Lawyers have Òsupeenees,Ó as actor Wilford Brimley said as the prosecutor in the movie Absence of Malice.

A wonderful thing, a subpoena. It can make the most reluctant witness talk, and even tell the truth. On a good week a fourth of the phone calls I make as a reporter are not returned; on a bad week itÕs more like three-fourths. Probably a typical batting average for the press. No supeenees, you see. Reporters can hardly ever get the real story, or we canÕt tell it because we have to swim in the same water.

Ten years ago, McCalla became a judge in this world where you can get to the bottom of things and find out whatÕs really what, and he brought with him all his considerable brainpower as well as his impatience, his temper, his biases, and the tenacity of a handball player. Strangely enough, the law firm that brought him down includes some of his erstwhile Wolf River Society lunch companions. Even in the courtroom, that arena of gladiators, there are rules, and McCalla broke them, or so they say.

An hour after he surrendered to the appellate judges and agreed to their humiliating terms, McCalla agreed to see me for a few minutes in his chambers. He was cleanshaven, dry eyed, and his handshake and voice were firm. I asked him if I could use anything he said under any conditions in a newspaper story. He looked at his lawyer standing several feet away. She said nothing, and shook her head,no.

— JOHN BRANSTON

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

The Play’s the Thing

There is a characteristic moment in any Shelby County Commission
debate of consequence when Julian Bolton, who once taught dramatics at
college, seems to get a whiff of which way the wind is blowing through
the audience out there in the auditorium.

He begins to lean in the direction of the onlookers, swiveling
his head due left so as to be looking right into their faces, and when he
talks, he appears to be addressing the folks out there, not his commission
colleagues.

The predominant school of thought among principals at Monday’s
commission meeting seemed to be that the 75 or so people who showed up early
to raise hell against a tax increase for the county schools were the fruits,
as Shelby County school board member Ron Lawler put it, “of 10
days straight of Mike Fleming trying to turn a crowd out.”

Indeed, there had been a dedicated attempt at conscription
on the part of the popular WREC-AM 60 radio talk show host — who generally is
a gentle rain and sweet reason itself compared to his tempestuous counterparts
in Nashville, Steve Gill and Phil Valentine.

In the manner, however, of Gill and Valentine, who on each
occasion this year that the state legislature came close to giving serious
attention to a state income tax did their shows and broadcast their
exhortations from the pavement of Legislative Plaza, Fleming set up his
broadcast booth Monday afternoon on the concrete patio outside the county
office building where the commission was meeting.

Many of the folks inside the often rowdy commission auditorium
(some of whom proclaimed themselves to be members of the “Turnip
Liberation Army,” as in “Turnip Your Nose at a Tax Increase,”
as one sign had it) had answered Fleming’s call, and, though this group
included many of those who had protested both the NBA Grizzlies’ cause and
previous potential tax increases, there were some newcomers as well —
noticeably less interested in the niceties of public discourse than earlier
protesters had been. Bolton, however, acted as though he were in the presence
of Vox Populi.

And the commission’s newest member, Bridget Chisholm, who
— perhaps not coincidentally — sits to Bolton’s left on the auditorium stage
and frequently whispers with her neighbor, also seemed caught up in the often
turbulent crowd reaction as the commission met Monday to complete action on
the current fiscal year’s budget so as to fund the Shelby County schools.

For reasons best known to themselves (although some clue was
surely afforded by their frequent sidewise glances toward the audience, as
well as to the omnipresent TV cameras from all four local news channels), both
Bolton and Chisholm began professing a belief that the taxing arrangement
which everyone save Bolton had signed on to at the commission’s previous
meeting was something other than what it was.

As had been extensively reported in both the electronic and print
media, a bargain had been struck two weeks ago between key members of both the
commission’s white Republican and black Democratic factions whereby a majority
of Republicans would accept a property tax increase in the range of 43 cents
in return for a Democratic majority’s approval for a doubling of the
regressive wheel tax.

As outlined by GOP Commissioner Buck Wellford, who with
partymate Tommy Hart had crafted the plan, there was a third component
as well — a sense-of-the-commission resolution that the county’s municipal
governments would be asked to forgo their share of a potential local-option
sales-tax increase in the interests of the county schools. As part of the
deal, county school superintendent Jim Mitchell and school board
president David Pickler agreed to urge the municipal governments to
accept such an arrangement.

On Monday, both Bolton and Chisholm professed for some while to
believe that only a 33-cent property-tax increase had been agreed upon.
Ultimately, budget chairman Cleo Kirk, in a whispered conversation,
convinced Chisholm otherwise, and she reversed an earlier vote against the 43-
cent figure so as to finally pass and activate the combination tax
package.

Wellford — who, with Hart, Kirk, and Commissioner Walter
Bailey
, was cited for positive leadership by Pickler — said later he
found it a strange reversal that two Democratic commissioners had tried to
take a stand in favor of holding down the property tax. “Usually that’s a
Republican cause,” Wellford said.

In subsequently making his case against the 43-cent increase,
Bolton — who was hooted by the audience early in the meeting when he seemed
to say he would support a property-tax increase at that level — told the
crowd, “Some of them [commissioners] have not heard you. I
have.”

Wellford made it clear he did not regard the crowd, which
frequently unloosed catcalls and interrupted commissioners’ remarks, in the
same positive light. “It was obvious some of them came just to put on a
show and were there to humiliate the commission,” he said. It was
Wellford, in fact, who — after referring to the crowd disturbances in
Nashville which frustrated an effort on behalf of a state income tax at the
end of the legislative session last month — called for a five-minute recess
and asked chairman James Ford to summon a complement of county police
and sheriff’s deputies to maintain order.

* Aside from mutual admiration and their both being the objects
of speculation about the 2002 Shelby County Mayor’s race, former city
councilman John Bobango and current District Attorney General Bill
Gibbons
have something else in common — a belief in the relative
powerlessness of the county mayor’s job.

“I’m not even sure you could regard it as a stepping stone
up in the political world,” opined Gibbons during his annual fish fry
fund-raiser at the East Memphis Catholic Club Saturday. And Bobango, who
introduced Gibbons to the sizeable (and somewhat bipartisan) crowd on hand,
had similar sentiments. “It [the position of county mayor] is not even
close to being as powerful as Mayor Herenton’s job,” said the ex-
councilman.

Nevertheless, the two remain the favorites for the Republican
nomination for county mayor. Other Republicans whose names continue to receive
some play are Shelby County Commissioner Buck Wellford, city councilman
Jack Sammons, Probate clerk Chris Thomas, and Circuit Court
clerk Jimmy Moore. (Moore is also considering a sheriff’s race, as well
as one for reelection.)

* Eyebrows have been raised here and there concerning the
increasingly overt support being given the possible mayoral candidacy of
Democrat A C Wharton by Bobby Lanier, who is chief
administrative aide to county mayor Jim Rout as he was for Rout’s
predecessor, Bill Morris.

The situation has caused speculation in the camp of Democratic
mayoral candidate Harold Byrd that Rout is secretly pushing Wharton’s
candidacy. Others allege that Lanier and Rout have had a minor falling-out and
that Lanier is acting as a free agent. Both explanations strain credibility,
but the central fact prompting them — Lanier’s support for Wharton — is
quite real.

* In two appearances here over the weekend, U.S. Senator Fred
Thompson
shed no light on the question of the day in state politics: Will
he or won’t he run for reelection? Appearing on Saturday at the Gibbons fish
fry, Thompson made only one jesting remark about the subject. Pointing to his
old friend, 90-year-old John T. Williams, whose unsuccessful 1970s-
vintage congressional race Thompson had managed, the senator said, “Now,
John T there is gearing up for a Senate race, I hear.”

However, Thompson did minimize a suggestion made earlier last
week by his Tennessee GOP senatorial colleague, Bill Frist. While
acknowledging that Thompson goes “up and down” on his willingness to
pursue a reelection race in 2002, Frist had said in an interview here last
week that there was “a 70-percent probability” that Thompson would
run next year.

“I don’t know where he got that. It didn’t come from
me,” Thompson insisted during a conversation at the fish fry.

Frist had made his remarks while in Memphis as guest of honor at
a fund-raiser at the downtown Plaza Club for U.S. Rep. Ed Bryant, who
has senatorial ambitions that can be shelved in favor of a congressional
reelection race.

In apparent response to what many took to be a senatorial-race
trial ballon floated by former Governor Lamar Alexander last week,
Frist said, “In the event that Senator Thompson does not run for
reelection, I have no doubt that Ed Bryant has far and away more support to
succeed him than anyone else.”

Frist’s presence, coupled with his interview statement, had to be
regarded as a huge boost for Bryant, who had reacted to Alexander’s
collaboration with former Vice President Al Gore in a Nashville-based
political seminar and a subsequent item in the Wall Street Journal on
Alexander’s potential Senate candidacy, “I wondered what he [Lamar] was
doing giving all that free publicity to Al Gore. Now it seems obvious he had
another motive.”

Any statement about senatorial prospects counts especially heavy
coming from Frist, who is considered as close to President George W.
Bush
as any member of Congress and is both the president’s liaison with
the Senate and chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

* In case Thompson doesn’t run, there’s a surprising addition to
the usual laundry list of possible candidates to vie for the open seat. State
Senator Steve Cohen, whose name still figures in speculation for Shelby
County Mayor, said this week that he might give the race a try if the Senate
seat comes open.

Since U.S. Rep. Harold Ford Jr. is always mentioned in
speculation about Democratic Senate candidates, Cohen’s statement of interest
is a reminder of 1996, when both men sought the 9th District congressional
seat.

* In an interview before he addressed an audience of the East
Shelby County Republican Party at the group’s annual “Master Meal”
at Woodland Hills Country Club Friday night, 4th District U.S. Rep. Van
Hilleary
shied away from loosing any broadsides at a possible general
election opponent, Democrat Phil Bredesen, and gave the former
Nashville mayor credit for sincerity in his recent espousal of a no-new-taxes
policy toward state government.

Hilleary was somewhat more grudging in his attitude toward a GOP
partymate, Governor Don Sundquist, declining to say that, if nominated,
he expected the governor’s support in a general election contest, other than
to say, “I would anticipate having the support of every elected
Republican in the state.” Would he seek Sundquist’s support? he was
asked. “I seek everybody’s support,” the congressman replied.

Hilleary made it clear that the twain were far from meeting on
the issue of tax reform.

Categories
Hot Properties Real Estate

Classic Midtown

This block
has just about one of everything. There are certainly some over-the-top
renovations by committed homeowners. Then there are a couple homes that look
like the best that could happen would be a meeting with a bulldozer. And
there’s even a recent construction that has made the most of a lot vacanted by
a fire. It’s a classic Midtown block if ever there was one.

This Queen Anne cottage has also gone through quite a few changes
in the past 90 years. At some stage the wrap-around front porch had its side
enclosed to enlarge the entry. An Arkansas fieldstone fireplace was added at
the same time, as was the big picture window facing the street. The front
porch doesn’t seem to have suffered from this change, and the increased room
inside and the fireplace are quite nice.

The picture window, however, would look much better on the curb.
A pair of double-hung windows (like the single on the left) would be an
inexpensive improvement. Inside, the entry and living room are combined. It’s
a nice space but furniture would arrange easier with the addition of two round
columns (to match those on the front porch) to slightly separate these two
rooms. The oak floors throughout have been nicely refinished.

The rooms in this house are bigger than the ouside could possibly
suggest. There’s a large front bedroom that’s sheltered from the sun and the
street by a venerable old sycamore. The middle bedroom opens off the living
room through a pair of French doors. As a guest room, it could also double as
a home office or TV room.

The rear bedroom is yet another space that’s been added to this
house over the years. It’s well-scaled and, with two pairs of windows, has
plenty of light. It also has a full wall of closets (obviously not original)
and pretty handy by any standard.

The bath and kitchen have both been recently redone. The bath has
a new pedestal sink. Both it and the overscale cast-iron tub are set off by a
new ceramic-tile floor. A white bead-board wainscot finishes off the bath. The
kitchen was a much harder redo. The refrigerator was recessed in a niche just
around the corner in the adjoining utility room. This bit of planning allowed
a nice galley layout to be achieved. New halogen track lights, a terra-cotta
floor, and all new appliances (including a washer and dryer) add sparkle.

There’s a full basement (yes, full), but it was built either just
for the kids or a rather short family. Even so, it provides fabulous storage.
Out back there’s a single-car garage and privacy fencing with lots of sun for
a garden or pool or just lawn. Like the rest of the block there’s a wonderful
mix of materials and modern additions that make this cottage classic Midtown.

2054 Linden Avenue

3 bedrooms, 1 bath; $127,900

1,300 square feet

Realtor: Crye-Leike, 218-3961

Agent: Rick Travers, 725-5309

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

The Best Defense?

Athletes like superlatives. They can define a career: most points scored,
most touchdowns, most tackles. Though such accomplishments can take a career
to create, the process starts game by game, by making each outing the best of
the season.

The 2000 home opener for the University of Memphis football team
against Mississippi State was one of superlatives for both teams. The Tigers
held the Bulldogs to season lows in first downs (7), rushing yards (45 yards),
pass attempts (20), pass receptions (10), net yardage (82 yards), and overall
offensive output (127 yards).

MSU held the Tigers to a season-low three points, allowed the
fewest pass completions by an opponent in 2000 (10), forced a season-high five
opponent fumbles, collected a season-high three fumbles, and converted two of
those fumbles to touchdowns as the Tigers helpfully lost the ball on their own
25-yard line and six-yard line. And the three points the Tigers scored were
the fewest scored by any MSU opponent in 2000.

The Tigers dominated the Bulldogs defensively unlike any other
team in 2000. The Bulldogs dominated the Tigers defensively, also unlike any
other team they played in 2000. But despite this parity, the Tigers scored
three points; the Bulldogs scored 17. Welcome to University of Memphis
football. Here’s a question for new head coach Tommy West: What difference
will a year make?

If you watch this year’s Tiger offense practice against their own
defense, the answer appears to be: not one heck of a lot. Sure there is a new
offensive set, one with no huddle and lots of receivers. But the same players
who achieved the second-worst passing and rushing stats in Conference USA in
2000 return, without any notable step-ups in talent. It doesn’t help that they
have to learn the new offense against the nationally ranked Tiger defense.

Truthfully, it probably won’t matter what offense the Tigers put
on the field. This first West-coached team will still rely heavily on its
defense. Attending a U of M practice makes it apparent: The offense is going
to have to struggle along and try to improve as the season unfolds.

Despite losing nose tackle Marcus Bell, defensive tackle Calvin
Jones, end Andre Arnold, tackle Jarvis Slaton, and linebacker Kamal Shakir to
graduation, this team is loaded defensively and easily picks apart the new
offense. West has said publicly that this isn’t surprising, since the defense
has played this offense repeatedly and knows it well.

That’s true, but as the early morning dragonflies buzz
incessantly, zig-zagging the open practice field like defensive backs covering
a receiver’s route, the blue-shirted Tiger defense swarms the white-shirted
offense again and again, making the players and the plays look bad. Worse, the
constant whipping is taking its toll on the squad. While defensive players
scream at each other, chatter on and off the field, and make good-natured
comments toward the white jerseys (read: talk serious smack), the offense
quietly watches (or looks away) as ball after ball is dropped or as play after
play is buried by a mountain of blue. While the defense celebrates, the
offense looks as if it were down by 30 points with three minutes left in the
game.

It was so bad that West called additional practices last weekend.
West, of course, is diplomatic about it. “I don’t know if you are ever
where you want to be after training camp,” he says. “But I think we
made progress.” And that’s a good thing. Then again, it’s a whole new
offense, so just learning the plays counts as progress.

Tiger senior linebacker DeMorrio Shank says he understands the
reason for the extra time. “We needed a little more work,” he says.
“The more work, the better.” But aside from that, is the offense
really improving? “It’s definitely a difference,” Shank says.
“Hopefully we will rub off on the offense a little more by the end of the
season.” You would think just by playing against one of the best defenses
in the country day after day, the offense would get better, right? “It’s
got to prepare them,” Shank agrees.

But here’s an analogy. Take a person with an ugly face. Now bash
that person’s face into a brick wall for a couple of hours. Is that person
prettier than before?

The point is that even though the offensive system and the
offensive coordinator and the head coach are brand-new, this defense isn’t
going to let anyone see the light of day on its watch. That’s the problem the
offense has had during training camp.

Like a heavy and reliable blanket, the defense will suffocate
whoever tries to score. Shank says that while the defense might have been
nicer in the spring, the fall is something different. “It had to change
sometime,” he says. “Everybody comes in, everybody wants to be
close, everybody wants to be good. But we have to think about winning. We
don’t want just to be close. We want to win these games.”

Shank and the rest of the Tiger defense know that this team lost
to four teams by less than four points in 2000, including national powerhouse
Tennessee. They know that with a strong nucleus returning that they can
compete with anyone. But only if the new offense can play ball.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

Enough Is Enough

A new urgency was added to the deliberations of the Shelby County

Commission as it met Monday to consider the overdue matter of funding the
county

schools during the current fiscal and academic year. But that’s not all. A new
audience

was on hand as well.

The crowd that turned up for the meeting — composed in large part of

newcomers to commission proceedings — was loud, disruptive, and insulting. At
one point,

Commissioner Walter Bailey — a stouter-than-average man, to say the least —
was called

a “little potentate” by a man who stood up in the middle of
proceedings and shouted

out the epithet at the top of his voice. Other commissioners, and the
commission as

a body, came in for equal — and equally inappropriate — abuse.

Bailey and Chairman James Ford made several attempts to assure the

audience — clearly as determined to cut the commissioners down to size as to
pursue

their stated aim, that of resisting a tax increase — that their concerns
would be

dealt with. And, until the crowd’s more vocal members committed the strategic
error

of overkill, it was clear that several commissioners were responsive to the

anti-tax complaints and even to an organized stunt whereby several audience

members symbolically brandished empty wallets.

Inevitably, however, the demonstrators — for such, in effect, they
were —

pushed their luck to the point of using up both it and the patience of the

commissioners. Finally, it was one of the council’s known conservatives, Buck
Wellford, who

had enough. Pointedly saying, “We’re not going to have anything like
Nashville

here” (a reference to disturbances last month which erupted in occasional
violence

and which many think prevented the state legislature from properly finishing
its

work on a budget), Wellford called for a recess and for the additional
presence of

several uniformed county police and sheriff’s deputies.

“What I found interesting,” Wellford said later after the
commission’s

deliberations had resumed in a more sedate atmosphere, “was how many of
those

folks took off once they realized they weren’t going to be able to disrupt the

meeting. They didn’t want their reasons to be heard. All they wanted was to
put on a

show.” The East Memphis Republican member, who has placed much emphasis
on

curbing increases in the county property tax, said he thought the crowd had

been artificially “whipped up” by a local radio talk-show host, who
apparently,

said Wellford, was emulating two Nashville broadcasters who used their
broadcasts

to generate the mass turnout at Capitol Hill in Nashville last month.

In all fairness, the local broadcaster in question, Mike Fleming, may
not

have condoned the tactics which led Chairman Ford to say, “I have never

experienced that level of contempt for a public body in all my years of
service.” But the

behavior of the ad hoc throng summoned by Fleming was clearly beyond the pale.

All citizens have a right to be heard, and that includes their elected

representatives, whose rights were under assault on Monday afternoon. Indeed,
it is

our hope that the outburst in Nashville, which resulted in broken windows at
the

state capitol and physical intimidation of various legislators, will prove to
have been

a watershed event of sorts.

For some time in the late ’60s and early ’70s demonstrators of the
political

left pushed so recklessly against responsible constraints that they eventually

generated a backlash. Something like that is almost certainly in store for the

cureent demonstrators.

Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

friday, 31

Mame opens tonight at Theatre Memphis. Tonight’s art openings
include a reception at the new SOFO Gallery at 199 S. Main for the gallery
itself and for the Kreep’n Kudzu “Southern Culture” Road Show, and at the U of
M’s Gallery 203, for “Members Show,” works by members of the student gallery
association. Tonight is also the last Friday of the month, which means the
South Main Trolley Art Tour offers you free trolley rides to all the
galleries on S. Main St.(I’m told there were about 1,000 people there last
month, which is nice to hear).

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

MARSHA THE, ER, MODERATE!?

You may think that Marsha Blackburn, the arch-Republican state senator from posh Williamson County, the same Marsha whose Paul Revere-like emails from her legislative desk summoned up a host of angry protesters at the state Capitol in Nashville last July 12trh, can do no wrong with members of the anti-tax movement. Fahgitaboudit!

Believe it or not, there is a group of politically active citizens so much further to the Right and so ideologically Simon-pure as to be capable of putting even Sen. Blackburn on the griddle. As witness Wednesday night, when Blackburn drove by herself all the way to Memphis at a friend’s invitation to address members of the Shelby County Libertarian Party at Pancho’s Restaurant at the Cloverleaf Shopping Center on Summer.

Don’t misunderstand, she was the subject of much stroking and congratulations for her role in organizing the mass turnout at the Capitol last month, which critics maintain was a crude intimidation of the parliamentary process and which admirers contend was democracy in action. Blackburn didn’t quite get called “Joan of Arc” (local anti-NBA-Arena protester Heidi Schaefer, who was in attendance, got that honor), but Blackburn was called “heroine,” “ patriot,” all of that.

She may not have been prepared, however, for two questioners who were starting from Ground Zero where she was concerned, cutting her no slack for reputation or previous service. One made it clear that, whatever else Sen. Blackburn may have done, she was still one ‘a them tax-drawing drones sitting up there in Nashville at the people’s expense..

Another questioner, dripping with skepticism, demanded to know if she would abide by the U.S. Constitution (as defined by himself, of course). She allowed as how she would. “Are you sure?” the man demanded. “We’re going to hold you to it!”

The same man offered her a hoary catechism wrapped in a trick question. “Do we live in a democracy or a republic?” he demanded to know. Marsha answered quite sensibly, “A little bit of both,” thereby evading the semantic trap her questioner had set, ultimately for himself to fall into.

Blackburn, it turns out, has an acute sense of the New Age politically and of her role in it. She is aware that the conventional strict-constructionist conservative may choose to insist that ours is a republic, but she knows full well that the mass callout which she helped organize on July 12th (a variant of which was hazarded here locally on Monday at a Shelby County Commission meeting considering a tax increase) was a democratic phenomenon, a throwback to the Power to the People and participatory-democracy models which today’s conservatives have inherited from yesterday’s leftists. (According to the strict-constructionist “republic” model, you see, the people’s elected deputies should have been left alone and untroubled on July 12th, to reflect at their leisure on the merits of income-tax legislation.)

Blackburn said she was in no wise emulating Sen.Robert Rochelle, who is circuit-riding the state at his own expense to proselyte for tax reform (i.e., the income tax). “I just happened to get an invitation down for ths one event,” she said.

As to her future political plans, the senator from Williamson County said she would have to wait for redistricting to determine whether she might contemplate a congressional run (she is just now in Democrat Bart Gordon‘s 6th Congressional district but could conceivably end up in the 7th District of Rep. Ed Bryant, who would dearly love to run for the Senate if senior Republican Fred Thompson doesn’t seek reelection. And “friends” have continued to sound her out about a gubernatorial race. (Evidently, just as she is judged less than pure by strict constructionists, so is GOP favorite Van Hilleary considered not quite ideal by some purists on the Right.) “I have learned to say, ‘Never Say Never,’” Blackburn said, “but, of course, it is getting somewhat late in the game.”

Of two lodgemates among the legislature’s conservative contingent who had offered criticism of her actions last month, Blackburn was forgiving. “I think he’s a fine man who’s done many wonderful things,” she said of Sen. David Fowler (R-Signal Mountain), who said on the night of July 12th that Blackburn was “out of the loop” and had lost “all respect among the conservative, low-tax caucus.” She was equally kind toward Sen. Mark Norris (R-Collierville), who had said of Blackburn’s alarm-sounding emails, “She hollered fire in a crowded theater.” Norris was “a decent man” trying to do the right thing, Sen. Blackburn said.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

Clone Rangers

Pardon my sarcasm, but no one who has followed the recent debate in
Congress regarding human cloning and stem cell research — they are
intertwined — could help being impressed by the sheer stupidity of the
rhetoric, as well as the outcome.

By a lopsided vote of 265 to 162, the House banned all human
cloning, having decided the matter after less than a day of debate. Propelled
largely by religious conviction — now, there’s a reason to ban cloning — the
leadership was ecstatic.

“This House should not be giving the green light to mad
scientists to tinker with the gift of life,” said Rep. J.C. Watts, fourth
in the GOP House leadership.

Congress then went on its summer recess, enabling us all to
entertain the (probably vain) hope that, as the members sit on their
respective front porches, they will reflect on their impetuousness and be
overcome with shame. As they sip their iced teas, they may also come to wonder
why they moved with such alacrity to forbid something that — along with time-
travel and hair restoration — does not yet exist.

For all the talk, human cloning is not quite around the corner.
Cloning has famously been accomplished in sheep (hello, Dolly) but not yet in
dogs or higher mammals. The experts I’ve consulted say we’re talking 30 years
down the road and overcoming daunting difficulties. Fusing new DNA with old
DNA is not as easy as banning the process.

And even then what are we talking about? Why do legislators like
Watts employ the language of grade-B science fiction flicks to talk about
what, someday, may just be another reproductive choice? But he is not alone.
In a recent essay in The New Republic, the ethicists Leon R. Kass and
Daniel Callahan — both of whom were consulted by President Bush — call human
cloning “unethical.” Maybe so, but they never say why.

I grant you the prospect is scary, and no doubt it ought to be
regulated. But at the moment, babies are being produced by in vitro
fertilization. I know of a child produced by once-frozen sperm and carried in
the womb of a surrogate mother. This, to say the least, is not traditional. I
am not at all sure what God thinks of it. Nor does the so-called miracle of
conception always involve something warm and wonderful.

Think of two drunks in the backroom of some frat house. If God
approves of that, then who’s to say He frowns upon a childless couple
producing a clone of one of them? I don’t see the ethical problem here. Taste?
Propriety? Difficulties? Yes to them all. Among other things, the clone would
know its genetic destiny, and it would be saddled, as are identical twins,
with a lifetime of stupid remarks — “How do you know who you are?”
— but these are inconveniences, not momentous moral issues.

Had the House opted for a moratorium on human cloning, it would
have been praised for its sagacity. Instead, it leaped into the debate on stem
cell research. After all, if stem cells have the capacity to reverse or cure
diseases such as Parkinson’s, think of what could be done with cells produced
not by a stranger but by the recipient himself.

Back in 1969, Kevin Phillips published The Emerging Republican
Majority.
Now he might want to write The Emerging Republican
Theocracy.
It is led in the House by Tom DeLay, Dick Armey, and the
aforementioned Watts. They substitute faith for thought. For a minister,
that’s okay. For a legislator, it’s a sin.

This is a complicated subject — a peek into a frightening and
unknowable future. Congress should move slowly and not be spooked by silly
language about “mad scientists.” If moral questions are what concern
our politicians, then they ought to consider this: If they continue on their
present course, people will die — that’s all there is to it. Tell me the
morality of that.

Richard Cohen is a member of the Washington Post Writers
Group.
His work frequently appears in the Flyer.