Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

sunday, 31

Whew. Finally. The last day of August. If you re looking for a wild night to celebrate, tonight s Jam on It Retro, Disco, & Old-Skool Hip-Hop Night in the M Bar at Melange will take you way into the wee hours of the morning and is wall-to-wall madness and fun.

Categories
News The Fly-By

ADULT ENTERTAINMENT

The CA recently reported that California-based Thomson Multimedia, a subsidiary of Technicolor, will add about 400 jobs as its Memphis hub continues to expand. The story claims that, “Millions of naked movie discs [emphasis ours] … roll into the building to be labeled, shrink-wrapped, and shipped across North America.” Hey, we don’t care what the actors are wearing; in these tough times a job’s a job! Thanks to Fly-friend Eric at Goner Records for the tip.

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

HOWARD DEAN’S STUMP SPEECH

The entourage of staff, supporters, and media who accompanied former Vermont governor Howard Dean on his cross-country presidential-campaign tour last week got used to hearing variations on the Democratic frontrunner’s patented stump speech. In sequence and emphasis and delivery, it varied somewhat from place to place, but the essentials were the same in all venues. Here was The Speech as delivered by Dean to an overflow downtown crowd of 10,000 in the streets of Seattle last Sunday.

You are unbelievable. Can you hear me all the way back there, by that building over there? All right. All the way down that street over there? Well, I was just in Portland, they just set the record beating Philadelphia, and you just set the record beating Portland.This is unbelievable. I’ve got some thank-yous to say first.

First, I want to thank Paul Berendt, who’s the chairman of the Washington State Democratic Party. He’s been incredibly helpful to us. Where is he? Professor Hubert Locke, didn’t he do a great job welcoming everybody? Councilman Dwight Pelz, who’s been with us for a long time, we thank Dwight very, very much. One of the great governors in the history of Washington and the United States of America, former Governor Booth Gardner. Karen Marchioro, who’s been a great Washington democratic activist for a long time. I also want to thank Sudden Storms, and I want to thank the Seattle Community Singers for being so helpful. And I want to thank, behind me, all the Meetup volunteers and the hosts and the people who worked so hard to put together the biggest rally that Dean for America has ever seen.

You know, we’re going to have a little fun at the president’s expense here. BuT it’s not just going to be about making fun at the president’s expenseÑyou also have to say what you’re going to do, you can’t just say what’s the matter with the other guy, although we will spend a little time on that. If you’re the president of the United States, you’ve got to get two things right. Now, we’re going to spend some time talking about health insurance and the environment, renewable energy and educationÑthese things are important. But if you can’t get the economy right and foreign policy right, then you need a one-way ticket back to Crawford, Texas. You know, in Seattle, I think there’s something like 30,000 members of the International Association of Machinists that lost their jobs alone here. We’ve lost thousands and thousands of jobs since this president took office. We’ve run up the largest deficit in the history of the United States of America, the largest national debt in the history of the United States of America, shipped thousands of jobs to other countries. The president had enough money to give $3 trillion of our money, if you include the interest, away to his friends like Ken Lay. Who do you think is paying for that money?

That’s right, your taxes went up because he wouldn’t fund No Child Left Behind. Your taxes went up because he wouldn’t give you the homeland security money, so you had the choice between raising taxes or laying off firefighters or police officers. Taxes went up because he decided it was better to give $3 trillion to Ken Lay and the boys instead of funding special education, making the schools better, and taxes lower. Your college tuition went up, because the president of the United States thought cutting Pell Grants was more important than financing students.

[Voice in crowd: “Give ‘em hell, Howard!”]

Harry Truman used to say, [when] people used to say, “Give ‘em hell, Harry,” he’d say, “I don’t give them hell, I just tell the truth and Republicans think it’s hell.” We need a balanced budget in this country so we’re going to have jobs in America again to invest in America. No Republican president has balanced the budget in 34 years in this country. If you want to trust the federal government with your hard-earned money, you had better vote for a Democrat, because the Republicans can’t handle money. You know, the president’s given a lot of our tax dollars away to big corporations, but I think we better change our policy, because those corporations take our jobs elsewhere. What we need in this country is an investment policy for small businesses. Small businesses don’t pay as well as big businesses, their fringe benefits aren’t as good, but they stay in their own community.

We need jobs in America. We need to invest in America. Three trillion dollars. Can you imagine, if we could have taken some of that money, to rebuild our roads and our bridges, and our schools, and broadband telecommunications in the most rural parts of America so they can have information jobs as well, and invest in renewable energy and rebuilding the grid, so we can put people to work, and save the environment, and save our national security? We can do better than this.

We need jobs, Mr. President, not empty promises and $3 trillion of our tax money going to your friends who are writing you those $2,000 checks to finance your campaign. We can do better than that.Now let’s talk a little bit about foreign policy. I think most of you know that I’m the only one of the people who’s leading in the pollsÑcandidates leading the pollsÑwho did not support the president’s invasion of Iraq. Now, you know some of my friends that voted for the warÑSenator Lieberman, Senator Kerry, Senator Edwards, Representative Gephardt, President BushÑthey all said, “Oh, you can’t get elected unless you voted for the war.”

Well let me tell you something. I supported the first Gulf War because our ally was attacked, I thought we had a responsibility to respond. I supported the Afghanistan war because 3,000 of our people were murdered and that was an act of self-defense. But this time, the president told us that Iraq was buying uranium from Africa. That turned out not to be true. This time, the president told us that they were about to make a deal with al Qaeda. That turned out not to be true. This time, the vice president told us the Iraqis were about to get nuclear weapons. That turned out not to be true. And the secretary of defense told us he knew exactly where those weapons of mass destruction were, right around Tikrit and Baghdad, and that turned out not to be true. As the commander in chief of the United States military, I will never hesitate to send our troops to any country in the world to defend the United States of America. But as the commander in chief of the United States military, I will never send our sons and our daughters and our brothers and sisters to a foreign country to die, without telling the truth about why they’re going there.

You know, this president talks mighty big about defense. He’s an awful tough fella defending the United States of America. But he didn’t mind cutting 164,000 veterans out of their health-care benefits last January. He’s a pretty tough fella, he’s got all those folks over in Iraq that are working their butts off and afraid what’s going to happen because al Qaeda’s in Iraq now, but he didn’t mind cutting their pay last Friday, Friday night, when the press wasn’t going to recognize the announcement and pay much attention to it, proposing cutting the pay of the people he sent to defend America in Iraq. We can do better than that. We ought to treat our veterans with respect in this country, and he’s not doing it.President talks mighty big about defense, but he found three trillion of our tax dollars to give away to Ken Lay and the boys. But he couldn’t find enough money to give the city of Seattle and the state of Washington the homeland-security money he promised them.

He managed to find $3 trillion of our tax money to give to Ken Lay and all those guys writing the $2,000 checks, but he couldn’t find the money to buy the enriched uranium stocks in the former Soviet Union, which we’re entitled to buy under the Cooperative Threat Reduction Agreement, and if that stuff gets in terrorists’ hands, then we really do have a security problem in America.

He could find money for all of those tax cuts for the people writing him those $2,000 checks, but he couldn’t find enough money to inspect 90 percent of the cargo containers that come into this country every single day.

Something else I think the president doesn’t understand about defense. A little over a decade ago, the Berlin Wall came down, the Soviet Union votedÑAmerica didn’t fire a shot. There was a reason for thatÑthere were two reasons that happened. The first was we had a strong military. The other was, most of the people on the other side of the Iron Curtain wanted to be like America, and they wanted to be like Americans. We had strong ideals that the world believed in and respected. And in only two and a half yearsÑthis president’s reign in WashingtonÑyou would be hard-pressed to find a majority in any country in the world that wanted to be like us anymore. And a promise I’m going to make to you is, if you make me the president of the United States, I will restore the honor and dignity and the respect for this country that we deserve in the world, by having high moral purposeÉ.

The president says he’s awful tough on defense, but they’ve got a saying for that in Texas: The president’s all hat and no cattle when it comes to defense.

You know, in my state, in my state everybody under 18 has health insurance. Ninety-nine percent are eligible, 96 percent have it. In my state, in my state everybody under 150 percent of poverty, that’s all of our working low-income people, have health insurance. In my state, all of our seniors under 225 percent of poverty have prescription benefits. Seems to me if we can do that in a small rural state, 26th in income in the country, balance our budgets every year, surely the most wealthy and powerful society on the face of the earth can join the British and the Japanese and the Germans and the French, the Israelis, the Canadians, the Italians, the Irish, the Norwegians, the Swedes, even Costa Ricans have health insurance.

Harry Truman put health insurance in the 1948 Democratic Party platform. Fifty-five years later, it’s time we stood up for our promises. I don’t want to be a second-class citizen in the industrialized world anymore, Mr. President. I don’t like America being number two. We ought to join all of the industrialized countries of the world, and have health insurance for every man, woman, and child in America.

This country, we have nearly two million people in prison. Now prisons are a necessary part of American lifeÑyou can’t have violent people walking around the street. But prisons are the most expensive and the least effective social-service intervention that we do in this country. And, furthermore, any competent, qualified kindergarten teacher can tell you who the five kids are in his or her class that are most likely to end up in prison 15 or 20 years from now. And it seems to me, one of the questions we’ve gotten in this campaign, is that we have some idea who’s going to prison, the most expensive and the least effective social-service intervention that we make in this countryÑif we have some idea who’s going to use that service 15, 20 years from now, why is it that we’re not investing in small children, their families, now, to stop that from happening? In [my] state, we do. We visit every mom in the hospital, whether she’s the wealthiest or the poorest woman in the state, and we ask if she’d like a home visit. Ninety-one percent say yes, so we visit 91 percent of all our newborn children within two to four weeks of their birth. Now, most of the people don’t need any helpÑtheir families are fine, they’re happy to see a friendly face from the community. But the ones that do need help get childcare, health care, parenting skills and parenting classes, job training, programs to keep the dads visiting the kids if it’s a single mom. In 10 years, our child-abuse rate is down 43 percent. Child sexual abuse is down 70 percent.

And those kids have a much better chance of going to college than they do of going to prison, and we need to make that change in America. We have got to stop thinking in two- and four- and six-year increments in this country, and start thinking in 20-year increments, if we want to do something for children. And we’ve got to start thinking in 100-year increments if we want to preserve the environment of this country and of this world. We need a president who doesn’t think a renewable energy program consists of drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

I can see Karl Rove rubbing his hands together and cackling, “this liberal Birkenstock governor from Vermont who’s going to run against us.” Anybody here have Birkenstocks on?

The Danes, the Danes get 20 percent of all their electricity from the wind. It used to be that California had 80 percent of the wind turbines in the world. Today, Europe has 75 percent of the wind turbines of the world. Mr. President, I don’t like being second-class in America. We have fallen behind the Europeans. We are supposed to be the most technologically advanced nation on the face of the earth. Mr. President, how is it that you let the Europeans get ahead of us in renewable energy? You ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You don’t believe in global warming, but it’s real.

This president’s so tough on defense, I’ll tell you about renewable energyÑit’s an environmental issue, and it’s probably the most important one we face, among a lot of important ones. Although, let’s talk about the environmentÑcan you imagine the clear skies which [unintelligible] allows you to put more pollution in the air? I understand the president was up here talking about the Healthy Forests Initiative, which allows cutting old-growth trees.

Thanks, Mr. President, for the healthy forest, thanks for helping these children you didn’t leave behind either, Mr. President, we appreciate that too. Renewable energy’s a matter of creating jobs in this country, as we rebuild our grid. It’s a matter of saving this country, this environment, from global warming and all the things that go with it. And it’s a matter of national security, because right now our oil money’s going to the Middle East to fund terrorism, and teaching its small children to hate America, Mr. President. Until you’re willing to stand up to the Saudis, don’t tell me you’re tough on defense!

Now, I need your help. Boy are there ever a lot of you to help. I have to say, this crowd is so enormous that I’m really awestruck. This is a really good crowd. I’m not supposed to use numbers from the podium, because nobody trusts politicians to estimate their own crowds, but this crowd’s about 2,000 people bigger than I was told [to expect], and that’s a much bigger crowd than I’ve ever seen before. The number’s in double digits with three zeros coming after it. This is an unbelievable crowd. And I’ll tell you what. I need your help. I need you to go to deanforamerica.com. We’ve got a little bat up [on our website] this weekend [to track our fundraising]. The president came to Oregon and raised a million dollars, he came to the Northwest and raised an awful lot of money up here. You know what we’re going to do? We’re going to raise a million dollars this weekend over the Internet without flying around with all of those $2,000 checks. The average hit’s going to be 53 dollars. We’re going to take back America from all those people writing those $2,000 checks.Go to the net, go to the net, look up deanforamerica.com, give us your e-mail, we will not spam you, except for the last three weeks of every quarter, when we’re desperately trying to raise money.

But I’ll tell you something. I’ll tell you how many people I think are here, and do the math. If there’s a hundred names on your e-mail list, give us your e-mail and we’ll send you all the information. If you send outÑthis is the first time I’ve ever been able to say this in the campaignÑif you send [the information] out to your list, if it’s a hundred people, this gathering will reach one million Americans. One million Americans. One million Americans because of you here. You know how we’re going to beat this president? We’re not going to do what the other Democrats in Washington do. We’re not going to beat George Bush by being Bush Lite. We’re going to beat this president, by standing up for what it means to be a Democrat. Be proud to be Democrats, stand up for what Harry Truman said in 1948Ñhealth insurance for every single AmericanÑstand up for jobs, stand up for foreign policy with American values, stand up for equal rights for every single American.

We’re going to beat this president by giving the 50 percent of Americans who’ve given up on voting a reason to vote again. And I’ll tell you what I’m going to do. If you make me the Democratic nominee of this party, I’ll make you proud to vote Democrat again. The biggest lie people like me tell people like you at election time is, if you vote for me, I’ll solve all your problems.

The truth is, the power to change this country is in your hands, not mine. You have the power to take this party back and make it stand for something again, you have the power to give this country a foreign policy that’ll inspire respect around the world again, you have the power to give us back our sense of community again. When I was 20 or 21 years old, it was towards the end of the civil rights movement. And I believed that we were all in this together, and that the promise of America was that if any one of us was left behind, then the country could never be as great as it should be.

And so we were all held togetherÑthat it wasn’t just enough for me to say that I wanted good schools in Vermont, or it wasn’t enough for you to say as American citizens that you just wanted good schools in Seattle, or in the state of Washington. That we had and you had an obligation as an American citizen to say that we want good schools in Washington, and in Vermont, and we want good schools in Alabama, and in Mississippi, and in Oakland, California, too. And it wasn’t enough to say we want health insurance for everybody in Vermont, or everybody in Washington, but every one of those 230,000 kids who lost their health insurance in Texas last year, we want their families to have health insurance.

We are all in this together. This president, this president ran saying he was a uniter, not a divider. That was one of the things that he said that was the least true, of any of the things he said. We have a president who talked about the quotas at the University of Michigan. Even the most conservative Supreme Court since the Dred Scott decision didn’t agree with him on that one.

The president knows, his pollsters know, not only did University of Michigan not have a quota systemÑit never did have a quota system. But that the word “quota” is a racially loaded word, which is designed to appeal to people’s fears that they’re going to lose their jobs or their position at the university to a member of a minority group. This president played the race card. And for that reason alone, he needs to go back to Crawford, Texas.I am tired of people divided by race in this country.

I am tired of being divided by gender when the president of the United States thinks that he knows better than a woman what kind of reproductive health care she needs.

I am tired of a president who attacks Title IX, that’s allowed my daughter to have the same sports programs that my son had. I’m tired of the president dividing us by sexual orientation, saying what a great senator Rick Santorum is, and why Chief Justice Antonin Scalia is the next thing on his plate.

I want equal rights for all Americans, every single American.I want my country back, and so do you, and we’re going to take it back. And when we take it back, this time we’re not going to give it up again, because we’re never going to let the Rush Limbaughs and the fundamentalist preachers, we’re never going to let them take over this country again.

We’re going to speak up for ourselves this time. I want my country back, we want our country back, we want the promise of America that was given to us by Martin Luther KingÑwe are all in this together, and the day that we stop caring and standing up for things that matter is the day we start to die.

This country’s not ready to die, and we’re going to take it back. You have the power to take this party back, you have the power to take this country back, we have the power to take the White House back, and that’s exactly what we’re going to do in 2004.

Thank you very, very much.You have the power, you have the power, thank you very, very much. See you around. Thank you, Seattle, very, very much. Thank you, Seattle.

Categories
News News Feature

THE WEATHERS REPORT

TIME TO EAT CROW

“Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?”

-President George W. Bush, September 12, 2002

“We must come together to deal with this crisis or it tends to make the United Nations somewhat irrelevant.”

Secretary of State Colin Powell, September 13, 2002

“Now, at some point [the United Nations] has to ask how does it feel about that–does it want to be irrelevant? . . .”

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, September 18, 2002

“. . . [T]he president cannot imagine that the United Nations wants to make itself irrelevant.”

Presidential press secretary Ari Fleischer, October 3, 2002.

______________________________________________________________________________

“We’ve got to have more international participation in the international coalition force.”

General John P. Abizaid, top American commander for Iraq, August 28, 2003

______________________________________________________________________________

Oh, how it must stick in Rummy’s wrinkled craw, hearing his own top general tell everybody who will listen, “Look, we need help from the rest of the world.” A year ago, the neocons in the White House could not have been more eager to declare the United Nations “irrelevant” because it wouldn’t follow our marching orders on Iraq. The president’s advisors were practically begging him to go it alone, to show the rest of the world we didn’t need it. But now our own commanders are begging for something else: more “international participation” to fix the mess Bush, Rice and Rummy have created in Iraq. He won’t say so out loud, but you can bet General Abizaid would love to have in the field beside him right now a couple of divisions from “Old” Europe’s Germany and France.

Eat crow, Donald Rumsfeld.

Sorry, I can’t help it. Sometimes saying, “We told you so” to an arrogant twit is just too tempting.

Lately the Bush administration, finally heeding the advice of its only true internationalist, Colin Powell, has been skulking around the back rooms of the U.N. lobbying for a Security Council resolution that would send troops from other countries to Iraq to take some of the pressure off our own overburdened soldiers. Of course, we still want full military control over any forces that come in. And we’re not promising to give anybody else–especially them damn Frenchies!–any say in how Iraq is run or where the reconstruction money is going. (In case you didn’t know, it’s going to Halliburton and Bechtel–big Republican contributors. Duh!) Still, control issues aside, we’re asking the U.N. for military help.

Oh, yes, and the Bush administration is also calling now for an “international donors conference” in Madrid in late October, hoping to persuade the nations of the United Nations to raise money to help pay for Bush’s little exercise in shock and awe. I love that: “international donors conference.” Sounds like folks who give blood.

Which is pretty much what the Bushites want the nations of the U.N. to do: put their young men’s bodies on the line to draw some of the fire from ours.

The hawks of hubris decided last spring that we could go it alone. The war would be over fast, and the Iraqis would welcome our troops with flowers. Well, the war was declared over fast, back in May, by Mr. Bush himself. But apparently Saddam’s boys weren’t paying attention, and the Islamic militants in that part of the world saw that Iraq had become a barrel in which American fish were now conveniently swimming, practically asking to be shot. Now more American soldiers have been killed since the president’s declaration of victory than were killed in the “war” itself. Shock and awe? Aw, shucks.

The war-mongers are learning a difficult lesson: Flowers are not what blossom from grenade-launchers.

But it does no good just to bash Bush. People are still dying in Iraq–our people and theirs (85 of theirs on August 29 alone, in a Shiite mosque)–and it needs to stop.

So here’s what Bush should do now:

  • First, he should go to France and Germany personally and apologize in speeches to their legislatures.
  • Second, he should deliver a speech to the United Nations, admitting he was wrong to go it alone in Iraq and requesting that the U.N. organize a multinational force of at least 30,000 soldiers who will take over security operations in Baghdad and in the major cities where Saddam’s Sunnis are not most prominent, defusing some of the growing anti-American hatred. (Americans can continue to hunt for Saddam in Sunni-dominated Tikrit, where hatred will thrive anyway.) He should also ask for U.N. help in reconstructing Iraq’s social infrastructure–a task the organization has proved itself well-suited for in the past.
  • Third, he should request that such a bail-out-the-U.S. resolution be proposed in the security council by France, Russia and Germany, so it has a decent chance to pass. The proposal should put the multinational military force jointly under the control of an American general and a Norwegian general. Everyone seems to trust the Norwegians, the most loyal supporters of the U.N. for decades and already part of the U.S. coalition in Iraq. Norway’s defense minister, Kristin Krohn Devold, even uses language Rumsfeld can understand when explaining her country’s military availability: “We want to be relevant,” she told The New York Times recently.
  • Fourth, Bush should call U.N. weapons inspectors–citing Hans Blix by name, if necessary–back into Iraq to look for the unconventional weapons Bush and Blair have claimed were there. Why? Because if American special ops forces find such weapons now, who will believe they didn’t plant them?
  • Fifth, Bush must promise to share the profits of Iraqi reconstruction with businesses from the nations sending the multinational force, even if it means a little less money in his 2004 campaign war chest from Halliburton and Bechtel. And when Iraqi oil starts to flow again, other nations should be free to make deals for it.
  • And sixth, Bush should rescind his massive tax cut for the rich, so our children and grandchildren aren’t bankrupted by this billions-per-year war.

    Presidential political hack Karl Rove should advise his boss that it’s in Bush’s own best interests to take such a path, for history tells us that a Republican president voted out of office is of little use. So I ask you, Mr. Bush: Do you want to make yourself irrelevant?

  • Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    THE AMAZING EXPANDING MAN…

    Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who began his presidential bid as a long shot several months ago, has now become a full-blown frontrunner among Democrats, his dimensions and prospects expanding in much the way of the giant screen blowup at stage right of his Tuesday night rally at Bryant Park in midtown Manhattan. The Flyer traveled with the candidate during a 10-city, three-day cross-country tour that began on Saturday in suburban Washington, D.C. We’ll share the results with you over the next few days on this website and in next week’s issue of the Flyer. Meanwhile, here’s a photo scrapbook of sorts.

    Categories
    News The Fly-By

    MMMM, ASS BURGERS!

    Categories
    We Recommend We Recommend

    saturday, 30

    Okay, I am running out of space, time, and brain cells so the rest of this has to be brief. The only place you need to be tonight is the Hi-Tone for Shangri-La s The 90s Memphis Garage Rock CD-Release Shindig featuring 68 Comeback, The Compulsive Gamblers, The Royal Pendletons, Greg Oblivian & The Tip-Tops, Impala, The Neckbones, Lorette Velvette, Jack Oblivian, The Cool Jerks, The Snakehips, The Grundies, and other Memphis legendary bands. It just doesn t get much better than this.

    Categories
    Food & Wine Food & Drink

    Eco-Engineering

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers hasn’t always had the best image when it comes to protecting the environment. But the corps’ Memphis District hopes to improve its reputation with a study called the Lower Mississippi River Resource Assessment (LMRRA). The study would help determine natural-resource and wildlife-habitat needs as well as recreational access along the river’s lower half. The problem: Congress authorized the study in 2000 but has yet to allocate the funding.

    The corp’s primary goals are to ensure the river remains navigable and to maintain flood control. However, according to the National Wildlife Association, artificially altering waterways is one of the principal causes of the decline of aquatic ecosystems.

    “We don’t have the authority to do all we can for the environment, and we’re kind of limited as to how much we can personally lobby Congress,” says David Reece, chief of the Memphis District’s Environmental Branch. “One thing they have authorized is the LMRRA. It was introduced into legislation in 2000, but we’ve not gotten the funds to do that study. The LMRRA would involve us looking at the river’s needs with the Department of the Interior and the seven states in the lower river area.”

    In the LMRRA study, the corps would use existing information to determine a “snapshot status” of the lower 954 miles of the river. The corps would then prepare a report for Congress with its recommendations for restoring the river’s environmental health. The key is determining what can be done for the river’s ecosystem without impacting navigation or flood control. Reece says the corps would need $500,000 to get started, but there’s nothing for the project in the 2004 budget.

    The study, which was authorized under the Water Resources Development Act of 2000, involves Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Louisiana.

    Since the corps isn’t able to lobby Congress, it’s turned to outside environmental groups such as the Tennessee Parks & Greenways Commission. In late July, representatives from several conservation groups in the lower Mississippi River valley joined corps members on a boat ride down the river to discuss how the groups can help get the funds.

    “From a wildlife point of view, there are so many things we could do,” says Gary Myers, executive director of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. “The corps is authorized to do the work. We just need to convince Congress that it would be money well spent.”

    If the corps had the LMRRA funding, Reece says it would be able to do much more for fishery habitats because the projects wouldn’t have to be directly tied to navigation. For example, if an oxbow or side channel closes off and begins filling in with sediment, the corps would be able to dig it out and reconnect it to the river, even if the project had no effect on navigation. They’d also be able to do more for the lower river’s two endangered species: the least tern and the pallid sturgeon.

    In the meantime, the corps is increasingly trying to incorporate environmentally friendly measures into its navigational projects. One way is by notching rock dikes mini-dams perpendicular to the river’s bank. The dikes maintain a navigation channel for barge traffic but can also be the cause of fish kills because they trap sediment from agricultural run-off.

    The corps has begun creating openings in dikes to allow some water to flow through. The notches not only protect fish from trapped sediment, they also create a place for fish to thrive without being disturbed by river traffic.

    “What we’re trying to do is take the existing navigation work that we do and make it more fish-friendly and environmentally friendly,” says Reece.

    Ron Nassar, coordinator for the Lower Mississippi River Conservation Committee (LMRCC), wants to see the fishery habitats improved in the Mississippi, but at the same time, he’d like to see the river attract more tourists. He says a recreational river would better sustain its geographical character. As a result, the LMRCC has jumped on the bandwagon of supporters for the corps’ LMRRA project.

    “This is one of the last great wild places left in the Eastern U.S., and you never hear about it unless there’s a flood or a navigation problem,” says Nassar. “The river deserves more attention. It’s an important natural resource. There’s no question about that whatsoever, but it’s also important to the heritage and culture of the South.”

    Categories
    We Recommend We Recommend

    friday, 29

    The Drawer Boy about a young theater researcher who comes to live with two good friends on a farm opens at TheatreWorks tonight. It s the last Friday of the month, which means it s time again for the South Main Trolley Art Tour, which ought to be even more fun than ever with the Memphis Music & Heritage Festival going on down there. In addition to all of the galleries and shops hosting open houses, there s an opening reception at Durden Gallery for Influences, paintings by David George Hinske; a performance by Memphis recording artist Bruce Carroll, and a Minty Mojitos Night party at Tonic. At Isaac Hayes Food Music Passion, tonight kicks off the Lane College Memphis Blues Labor Day Football Classic with a concert by Chante Moore & Kenny Latimore. Tonight s Orpheum Summer Classic Movie Series Feature is Gone with the Wind. Tonight kicks off this weekend s Dingofest V, with some 130 bands in 13 clubs on Beale Street. The Nokie Taylor Quartet is at CafÇ Soul tonight. Calabus, 3 Guys That Hate You, and Adios Gringos are at Murphy s. And, as always, The Chris Scott Band is at Poplar Lounge.

    Categories
    Opinion

    An Ill Wind?

    When in the midst of a Blame Typhoon, with charges and counter-charges being hurled in all directions, I find it most useful to consult those two polar stars of utter wrongheadedness, Tom DeLay and The Wall Street Journal‘s editorial page.

    Both good for a chuckle, and both perfect weathervanes for the wrong direction. When in doubt, disagree with DeLay, and you’ll be okay.

    The Journal, in addition to meretricious arguments, vast leaps over relevant stretches of fact and history, and an awesome ability to bend any reality to its preconceived ideological ends, also offers that ludicrous dogmatism that never fails to charm.

    A column about energy politics by George Mellon in a recent Journal contained just the right mix of irrelevant argument (he’s very upset that a bunch of nervous nellies want to shut down the Indian Point nuclear plant, as though this had anything to do with the frail, undercapitalized transmission grid that caused the August blackout), expedient forgetfulness (uh, actually, OPEC had quite a bit to do with the gasoline crunch of the 1970s), and perfectly delightful nuttiness (“millions of Naderites are trying to peddle windmill farms, even though these inefficient H.G. Wells monsters are already destroying the scenic beauty of places like Palm Springs and the Dutch coast”).

    Scenic beauty of the Dutch coast?

    When Mellon goes on the aesthetic offensive against unsightly windmills as compared to the ever-so-sightly coal-fired plant, oil refinery, and nuclear power catastrophe-in-waiting we must snap to attention. Mellon may be interested to know that in Austin we can purchase “green energy” from the windmill farm near Fort Stockton, Texas, for 2.85 cents per kilowatt hour, and that cost is guaranteed not to increase for the next eight years. Regular electricity from Austin Energy, a municipally owned company, is now undergoing a three-step price increase that will move its fuel charge from 1.774 cents to 2.796 cents per kilowatt hour by the end of January.

    Mellon works for our most respected financial newspaper: If the Journal could get a 10-year, fixed-price energy contract at 2.85 per kilowatt hour, would the Journal take it? (In New York City, the price for power generation charged by ConEd hovers around 10 cents per kilowatt hour.)

    As for the aesthetics of windmills: Cars pull over by the highway in West Texas so the kids can watch the things go round and round.

    Clean, cheap, endless energy no radioactive waste, no air pollution, no strip mining, no oil spills, and no gas-pipeline explosions. Yet the Bush administration wants to spend billions subsidizing coal, oil, gas, and nuclear power and leave both wind and solar technology unsubsidized and unhelped. Now, is that a stupid policy or what?

    Every energy source in this country has been vastly subsidized, including hydropower by government-built dams. If wind power were subsidized at a fraction of what we already spend with tax breaks, loopholes, and outright corporate welfare for polluting and destructive energy sources, it would already be the cheapest, not to mention the cleanest, energy source available. This is not pie-in-sky Naderism (whatever that is). This is right now, 2.85 cents per kilowatt hour.

    And why do we have such dumb, damaging, self-destructive energy policies? Do you think it has anything to do with corporate campaign contributions? Do you think it has any connection to the fact that Dick Cheney wrote the National Energy Plan? (In secret, with the advice of oil, gas, and coal executives and lobbyists.) A couple of Ken Lay’s suggestions in his famous memo to Cheney were incorporated word-for-word in the Cheney plan.

    As for the always-egregious Tom DeLay, the Exterminator, two years ago he blocked a program of loan guarantees for upgrades to the transmission system. Said he of the Democratic proposal, “It’s pure demagoguery.” The first thing he did when the lights went out was to blame the Democrats, of course.

    Now, according to The New York Times, the Republicans are refusing again to pass stand-alone transmission-grid improvements. They insist on including the rest of the Cheney rip-and-run plan, including drilling for oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge and other economically marginal and environmentally disastrous schemes.

    These free-market fundamentalists are on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of economics, the wrong side of technology, the wrong side of progress, and the wrong side of the environment. Better, cleaner, cheaper sources of power are now available. Get your heads out of the sand, your asses in gear, and join the 21st century. This is not “Naderite” romanticism, you dumb schmucks. It’s already making money.