Categories
Editorial Opinion

Full Circle

Anyone who has spent any time in downtown Memphis has probably chanced upon Jacqueline Smith, one of the most tenacious resistors in the history of civil protest. That’s both appropriate and ironic, because as Chris Davis reminds us once again in this issue, the target of Smith’s protest is none other than the National Civil Rights Museum itself.

Smith’s argument is not with the idea of memorializing Dr. Martin Luther King, who was assassinated in 1968 at the Lorraine Motel, site of the present-day museum. It is with the way in which that project of honoring the martyr, his memory, and his mission has been carried out. As she sees it, the money spent on constructing the current facilities on Mulberry Street might have been invested instead in some kind of project that could have preserved the historical life patterns on Mulberry rather than on a museum.

It’s a point that’s somewhat conceded by Judge D’Army Bailey, one of the museum’s founders. Even making all due allowances for the grievances conceivably being nursed by Bailey, who was forced out as museum president some years ago by members still prominent on the museum’s current board of directors, it is still striking that his point of view and Jacqueline Smith’s, formerly as divergent as could be imagined, have come to rest on the same basic complaint, that of the museum’s potential alienation from the human needs of the area surrounding it.

We have no intention of judging whether that complaint is well-founded or not. Clearly the National Civil Rights Museum has much to commend it, exactly as it is now constituted. It is not only a consistent attraction for visitors to Memphis, it is a nice (in the most nuanced sense of that word) counterpart to some of the bloody history that gave it birth.

Yet neither will we dismiss the protests being made by Smith or anyone else who can make a coherent case against the process of social paving-over which goes by the name of “gentrification.” All of the nation’s major cities have seen that process in the last few decades: As economic opportunity presents itself, the buildings in a depressed area are bought up, refurbished, and rented or sold to upscale businesses and residents. Meanwhile, the low-income residents who had been maintaining an existence in the area do not share in the good fortune. They are uprooted and forced to find habitation elsewhere.

If nothing else, Jacqueline Smith’s enduring protest, whether wrongheaded or not, is a stimulus to all of us who believe in the goal of civil rights to make sure that we mean what we say when we espouse and honor the goals of Dr. Martin Luther King and the other martyrs of our time and place.

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

Look, Ma, No Republicans!

Irony of ironies: The Shelby County Republican Party, which hit its high-water mark eight years ago when it elected a GOP mayor, two-term incumbent Jim Rout, now seemingly has nobody willing to run for the office.

Rout said months ago he wouldn’t run again. District Attorney General Bill Gibbons decided against a race two weeks ago; former city councilman John Bobango followed over the weekend; and state Senator Mark Norris, who had been emerging as the newest consensus nominee, said no Tuesday morning. Later Tuesday, city councilman Jack Sammons and outgoing Shelby County Commissioner Buck Wellford also made clear they would decline the opportunity.

All of them, either publicly or privately, alluded to the huge problems facing the county financially, to its diminished resources, to the meager powers available to a county mayor (especially over two problem areas, the Shelby County school system and the county jail), to the demographic shifts which are inexorably creating a Democratic voting majority, and to the appeal which Democratic candidates already in the field might have along the Poplar Corridor, an area which a successful Republican would need to do well in.

When he conducted last week’s monthly meeting of the Shelby County GOP’s steering committee, party chairman Alan Crone had just learned of Bobango’s decision. Somewhat wanly, he said to the committee, “If anybody here wants to run for county mayor, would you see me after the meeting?”

It may come down to Crone himself, who said this week that, if push came to shove, he’d consider running. Other possibilities include Commissioner Tommy Hart and city councilman Brent Taylor, who had already raised a sizeable campaign war-chest in hopes of mounting a race for Ed Bryant‘s 7th District congressional seat, deferred indefinitely after Fred Thompson decided to stay in the Senate and Bryant decided to stay where he was, too.

· Another unresolved issue of county government/politics is that of the commission’s District 5, which Wellford is vacating. There are at least four different plans extant right now as commissioners consider redistricting from the perspectives of party and/or class and/or race.

The phrase “toss-up” is often heard as a desideratum for the East Memphis seat, which could be shifted in almost any direction — north, south, east, or west. Wellford himself believes that the district will remain more or less unchanged.

In any case, few potential candidates for the seat have yet declared themselves. Two new ones are in the offing, however: Clay Perry, a Democrat who is U.S. Rep. Harold Ford‘s district director; and financial manager Bruce Thompson, a Republican.

· Memphis has become something of a battleground for the several Democrats — at least three so far — who hope to play Avis at the expense of Phil Bredesen‘s Hertz. They’ll try to try harder, in other words, so as to catch up with the former Nashville mayor, who is reckoned as number one in next year’s Democratic gubernatorial primary on the strength of his name recognition, financial war-chest, and commitments from party cadres.

It has to be said, of course, that Bredesen is trying pretty hard himself — not only in Memphis, which he’s visited several times, but elsewhere in the state. As he’s confided, he considers certain remoteness of style and of effort to have been a major fault of his losing 1994 effort as the Democratic nominee against Republican Don Sundquist.

Consequently, Bredesen has not only made himself more available to the public and the media at what is still a fairly early stage of the governor’s race, but his personality has generally remained sunny as well — without the sudden unexpected frosts (actually, they were probably just preoccupations) that were a feature of his campaign eight years ago.

Moreover, Bredesen is keeping his rhetoric on the cautious side, especially where the issue of taxation is concerned. He has renounced a state income tax as a panacea and maintained consistently that he can “manage” the state out of its current fiscal doldrums.

But, while that position serves to neutralize the tax issue vis-à-vis potential Republican opponent Van Hilleary, the 4th District congressman who is adamantly against a tax increase, it leaves an opening of sorts for Bredesen’s Democratic opponents — Knoxville District Attorney Randy Nichols, former state senator Andy Womack of Murfreesboro, and Charles Smith, who served formerly as both state Education Commissioner and as chancellor of the state Board of Regents.

Unlike Bredesen, none of the three have closed the door on the income tax, and Nichols has gone so far as to give a recent proposal for a 3.5 percent flat tax (coupled with a subsequent referendum) his conditional endorsement.

All three were more critical of Bredesen than of Sundquist when the ex-Nashville mayor attacked the governor last weekend for some of Sundquist’s recent economies — notably the closing of selected state parks, which Bredesen said was little more than a device to force acceptance of an income tax.

In almost identical language, the three other Democrats said that they might have applied other priorities but that Sundquist had little choice in the matter of making significant cuts. Smith, the most recent visitor to Memphis, went so far as to praise the governor for his “courage.”

In one respect, Smith has to try a little harder to try harder. As he said Monday, “One big difference between me and the others is that, with the exception of the time I spent as Education Commissioner [for former Governor Ned McWherter], I’ve had very little experience on the partisan side of politics; so I’ve been doing my best to become acquainted with party people the last few months.”

One measure of his success, according to Smith: a poll of state Democratic executive committee members and party chairs, meeting last month at Dickson, showed that he had doubled his support among them in less than a month’s time, going from 12 votes to 23, against Bredesen’s 43, with Nichols and Womack trailing.

Categories
News The Fly-By

City Reporter

Workman Update

Prosecutors say defense is just rehashing old evidence.

By Mary Cashiola

A dying man — whether he’s dying of lung cancer or a gunshot or the repercussions of his own past — fights death. He takes in as many breaths as he can, hoping for a reprieve with each one.

For more than 15 years, Philip Workman has been such a man. And at the last day of an evidentiary hearing last Monday, prosecutors argued that Workman’s attorneys were simply rehashing earlier evidence in an attempt to save their client’s life.

Convicted of killing police officer Ronnie Oliver during a Wendy’s robbery in 1981 and handed the death penalty, Workman was granted a stay of execution by the Sixth Circuit Court in March, less than an hour before he was to die of lethal injection. Monday’s evidentiary hearing was to determine if Workman has sufficient new evidence to warrant a new trial.

The evidence centers on an autopsy X-ray of Oliver’s body that was recently discovered and the recanted testimony of the state’s eyewitness. In discussing the X-ray, defense attorneys called Dr. Cyril Wecht, one of the nation’s premier forensic experts, to the stand during a part of the hearing last month; Wecht testified to a degree of medical certainty that certain characteristics of Oliver’s fatal wound were not consistent with the type of ammunition in Workman’s gun.

But on Monday, the defense called Wardy Parks, one of the jurors of the original trial.

“As a juror, we were charged to base our decision on the evidence. When you have an eyewitness who said he saw something … that had a heavy burden on our decision,” said Parks.

Judge John P. Colton did not allow Parks to speak as a witness of new evidence but allowed him to be called to the stand for the purpose of the appellate process.

“Would this newly established evidence have resulted in a different verdict had it been presented in trial?” defense attorney Robert Hutton asked the court. “What better evidence of that than Wardy Parks, one of the original jurors that voted to put Mr. Workman to death?”

When asked if the new evidence would have made a difference, Parks answered, “Of course! These are facts! Before, these facts were not there.”

The retired FedEx employee said that he did not hear any ballistics evidence during the original trial and believed the testimony of eyewitness Harold Davis. Davis is now thought to have perjured himself during his earlier testimony.

But after months of piecemeal testimony from the defense, the prosecution did not call a single witness. Prosecutor Jerry Kitchen argued that nothing new had been presented.

“They wanted to come here and prove once and for all that this defendant is not responsible for killing Lt. Oliver,” Kitchen said. “They suggested they have recently discovered evidence … they’ve presented theory after theory after theory.”

Most of the defense’s witnesses called also testified at Workman’s clemency hearing in January. After 12 hours of testimony, the six members of the Tennessee Board of Parole voted against clemency.

Colton will issue a written ruling on Workman’s petition for a new hearing within the next 30 days.


A New Chapter

The new main library opens this weekend.

By Lesha Hurliman

While the design of the NBA arena may not include a lot of glass due to safety concerns, the new $70 million central library has nearly five floors of it. From the outside, the library, all glass and polished metal, looks as though it is going to feel more like a technical manual than a cozy novel, but library representative Bobby King says that was never the intention of the architects. “It is designed to be self-orienting, with lots of primary colors and comfortable spaces,” he says. And though it has a modern feel, the building is stocked with soft chairs, private study rooms, and many other conveniences.

The new library boasts the largest fiction collection in the Mid-South, a teen center, a genealogical center, a children’s section that looks like the inside of a Dr. Seuss book, new travel and health sections, and nine privately funded works of public art from local and regional artists.

The library comes loaded with sleek black IBM computers with flat-screen monitors on every floor and tables with ports for laptop users. The Memphis and Shelby County Room comes complete with climate-controlled archives and reproductions of windows and refurbished tables from the original Cossitt library building downtown.

The new library is designed so that the noisiest activities which require the shortest visits — check in/out, periodical shelves, children’s section, and the Friends of the Library used bookstore — are all located on the main floor.

“As you go up, the length of the stay increases,” says King, “so that people who are doing genealogy research or searching the archives in the Memphis and Shelby County Room will have less traffic and noise to contend with.”

Though crews continue to scrape and sand and buff and haul, and the staff is probably losing sleep and developing ulcers, the grand opening is this Saturday, November 10th, at 9:15 a.m., beginning with a truck parade from the old central library at 1850 Peabody to the new one (less than two miles away) at 3030 Poplar. At 10 a.m. there will be a ribbon-cutting ceremony before library officials open the building to the public for the first time.


The Curse Of King Tut?

Attendance was down for Wonders’ latest Egyptian show.

By Janel Davis

Next show: treasures from Russia.

Wonders, The Memphis International Cultural Series, closed its “Eternal Egypt: Masterworks of Ancient Art From the British Museum” exhibit October 21st with low attendance records.

The exhibit, which opened June 28th at The Pyramid, ranks sixth in attendance averages for Wonders’ 10 exhibits so far. But Glen Campbell, Wonders’ chief operating officer, doesn’t see these numbers as a failure.

“We exceeded our expectations of 250,000 by nearly 40,000 people,” says Campbell. “That’s remarkable considering the state of the economy, the climate of our country, and the length of the exhibition.”

The 116-day exhibit saw 288,841 visitors and averaged 2,469 each day but still fell short of the other Egyptian-based exhibit, “Ramesses the Great,” which opened the Wonders series in 1987 and had a total attendance of 674,395 over its 138-day run.

The events of September 11th hurt attendance figures for several days. Visitors who did attend were allowed to sign a banner and sympathy card for the victims and donate money to the American Red Cross.

The exhibit, which showcased 144 items from the British Museum’s collection of Egyptian antiquities, was designed to trace the development of Egyptian art over 35 centuries, from shortly before the First Dynasty in 3100 B.C., to the Roman occupation of the fourth century A.D.

The next Wonders exhibit is “Czars: 400 Years of Imperial Grandeur,” presented in conjunction with the International Cultural Series and the Moscow Kremlin State Museum Preserve of History and Culture, in association with Cultural Exhibitions & Events. The exhibit will include more than 250 items from the Kremlin State Museum spanning the Romanov dynasty, including jewels and gold, crowns, a golden carriage, weapons, ceremonial dress, paintings, and textiles.

“Czars will mark the first exhibit to be held under the organization’s new not-for-profit status, which will allow Wonders to arrange long-term programming and become economically self-sufficient.

Wonders has selected Askew Nixon Ferguson Architects and Design 500 as the designers for the Czars exhibit.

The Wonders series was established to continue the success of the Ramesses the Great exhibition. Since then, Wonders has produced eight exhibitions focusing on a wide range of cultures and events, including “Imperial Tombs of China,” “Ancestors of the Incas,” “Titanic,” and “World War II Through Russian Eyes.” The “Czars” exhibit will run April 15th through September 15th of next year.


Taking a Bow

Playwrights’ Forum earns regional honors.

By Chris Davis

Dorothy Blackwood and Laurie Cook McIntosh

After more than a decade of being overlooked by local theater judges, Memphis’ Playwrights’ Forum has finally gotten some well-deserved recognition. Its production of Marriage to an Older Woman, which opened P.F.’s 2000 season, won first place in the community division of the Tennessee Theatre Association’s annual competition. In addition, Laurie Cook McIntosh, whose last local appearance was in Circuit Playhouse’s The Laramie Project, took home the competition’s award for excellence in acting.

McIntosh is currently serving as president of Playwrights’ Forum’s board of directors and also appeared in the Theatre Memphis production of Beauty Queen of Leenane, which won last year’s T.T.A. competition.

Playwrights’ Forum is an independent producing body that operates out of Theatre Works on Monroe, just behind Overton Square. The group’s mission is to produce original scripts by unknown playwrights in order to let the writers see how their work translates to the stage. Marriage to an Older Woman was written by New Jersey playwright John Fritz and focused on a 73-year-old woman’s marriage to a 60-year-old-man and the family controversies that arise as a result of the union.

The award-winning show also featured the talents of Dorothy Blackwood, Sam Weakley, and Ron Gordon.

To give its mission more of a local bent, Playwrights’ Forum is only accepting submissions from local playwrights for its 2002-2003 season. The deadline for entry is March 1, 2002. More information is available at www.playwrightsforum.org.


Turning Up the Heat

Firemen cry foul on promotions test.

By John Branston

Ten lieutenants in the Memphis Fire Department, including state Rep. Ulysses Jones Jr., are threatening to sue the city and fire department over the results of promotional exams.

The firemen have hired civil rights attorney Richard Fields, who last week outlined the grievances in a letter to Director Chester Anderson, Mayor Willie Herenton, and City Attorney Robert Spence.

“Before we commence litigation we would like to give the City of Memphis an opportunity to remedy this gross injustice to its employees and hire an outside investigator to review testing procedure,” Fields wrote.

Spence said he is preparing a response but the test will not be given over again.

Anderson declined comment.

The firemen want the test results thrown out and all promotions that were based on it rescinded.

They say the study material was incomplete, that some people who scored well got extra help, that some scores were incorrectly transcribed, and that there was at least one instance of cheating where a fireman was allegedly given test materials in advance by a commander.

Fields also attached materials claiming that black firemen did not get a fair shake. On the first scoring, over half of the top 130 scores were made by blacks, but on a rescoring only 32 of the top 130 were black.

Charges of test fraud have previously been made against both the Memphis fire and police departments. In the most recent scandal, copies of a police sergeant’s exam were leaked to some candidates.

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

MR. SMITH COMES TO MEMPHIS

Memphis has become something of a battleground for the several Democrats — at least three so far — who hope to play Avis at the expense of Phil Bredesen‘s Hertz. They’ll try to try harder, in other words, so as to catch up with the former Nashville mayor, who is reckoned as Number One in next year’s Democratic gubernatorial primary on the strength of his name recognition, financial war-chest, and commitments from party cadres.

It has to be said, of course, that Bredesen is trying pretty hard himself — not only in Memphis, which he’s visited several times, but elsewhere in the state. As he’s confided, he considers a certain remoteness of style and of effort to have been a major fault of his losing 1994 effort as the Democratic nominee against Republican Don Sundquist.

Consequently, Bredesen has not only made himself more available to the public and the media at what is still a fairly early stage of the governor’s race, but his personality has generally remained sunny as well — without the sudden unexpected frosts (actually, they were probably just preoccupations) that were a feature of his campaign eight years ago.

Moreover, Bredesen is keeping his rhetoric on the cautious side, especially where the issue of taxation is concerned. He has renounced a state income tax as a panacea and maintained consistently that he can “manage” the state out of its current fiscal doldrums.

But, while that position serves to neutralize the tax issue vis-ˆ-vis potential Republican opponent Van Hilleary, the 4th District congressman who is adamantly against a tax increase, it leaves an opening of sorts for Bredesen’s Democratic opponents — Knoxville District Attorney Randy Nichols, former state senator Andy Womack of Murfreesboro, and Charles Smith, who served formerly as both state Education Commissioner and as chancellor of the state Board of Regents.

Unlike Bredesen, none of the three have closed the door on the income tax, and Nichols has gone so far as to give a recent proposal for a 3.5 percent flat tax (coupled with a subsequent referendum) his conditional endorsement.

All three were more critical of Bredesen than of Sundquist when the ex-Nashville mayor attacked the governor last weekend for some of Sundquist’s recent economies — notably the closing of selected state parks, which Bredesen said was little more than a device to force acceptance of an income tax.

In almost identical language, the three other Democrats said that they might have applied other priorities but that Sundquist had little choice in the matter of making significant cuts. Smith, the most recent visitor to Memphis (for a fundraiser on behalf of State Rep. Kathryn Bowers (D-Memphis), went so far as to praise the governor for his “courage.”

In one respect, Smith has to try a little harder to try harder. As he said Monday, “One big difference between me and the others is that, with the exception of the time I spent as Education Commissioner [for former Governor Ned McWherter], I’ve had very little experience on the partisan side of politics; so I’ve been doing my best to become acquainted with party people the last few months.”

One measure of his success, according to Smith: a poll of state Democratic executive committee members and party chairs, meeting last month at Dickson, showed that he had doubled his support among them in less than a month’s time, going from 12 votes to 23, against Bredesen’s 43, with Nichols and Womack trailing.

Categories
Music Music Features

DEMENT-ED FARE — AND LIGHTER KINDS

Outside of the great Iris DeMent at the Bartlett Performing Arts Center on Friday, November 9th, this week is a little light on notable touring acts. After Iris, the best bet by far is The Pernice Brothers at Young Avenue Deli Saturday, November 10th.

Frontman Joe Pernice led the alt-country faves the Scud Mountain Boys a few years ago, but, joining brother Bob in the new band, he’s set country aside in favor of pure pop that conjures half-remembered mid-’60s American acts like the Zombies and the Hollies, not to mention Big Star.

The band’s current release, The World Won’t End, is a first-rate slice of depressive pop — a batch of effortlessly catchy and pretty songs whose candy exterior obscures a darker center. Pernice starts off singing about “Working Girls” who are “contemplating suicide or a graduate degree” before moving on to his own romantic problems, but it’s a winner either way. Nashville’s decidedly less subtle Bare Jr. will be on hand to provide butt-rockin’ counterpoint.

  • Most interesting local show this week may be inspired piano man Jason D. Williams breaking in the new Isaac Hayes club in Peabody Place on Thursday, October 8th. One of the most compelling shows I’ve seen all year was Williams opening for folk icon Michael Hurley at the Hi-Tone Cafe. I’m sure his show at Isaac Hayes’ club will be much less weird but, hopefully, no less wonderful.

  • And for amusement, you might want to check out Bands on the Run also-ran Harlow (the VH-1 show’s token chick band) at Newby’s on Tuesday, November 13th. — Chris Herrington

Categories
News The Fly-By

THE DRUGS MADE ME DO IT

Former Northwest Airlink employee Timothy Scott McNeill has a good excuse for making a false terrorist threat to Northwest. After telling authorities he had been captured by a group of Middle Eastern types and forced tomake the threatening phone call, McNeill blamed his antidepressant. “It made me hallucinate big-time,” McNeill was quoted as saying. Perhaps a similar excuse could work for Osama bin Laden.

Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

wednesday, 7

Live jazz with Tim Goodwin and Ted Partin at Java Cabana.

Categories
News News Feature

TIME FOR LEGAL CASINOES?: A NASHVILLE PERSPECTIVE

(For years the battle to legalize gambling has been waged by Memphis legislators — in the case of horse-racing as in the case of Sen. Steve Cohen‘s lottery referendum. Memphians like Mayor Willie Herenton have argued in vain for a change in the state’s constitution to permit casino gambling. So far little or no support has come from elsewhere in the state. Veteran political reporter Larry Daughtrey‘s perspective, published Sunday in The Tennessean of Nashville and re-published here by permission, may be a harbinger of change.)

Is it time for casinos on the Cumberland? It may not be as far fetched as it seems.

As the three-year stalemate on Tennessee tax reform continues to drag along, legislators have discussed and discarded almost every conceivable tax available for state revenue.

In addition to the hot button income tax, there has been, and continues to be, talk of a major tax on automobiles, a return to a state property tax abandoned to local governments in 1947, higher sin taxes and elimination of all exemptions to the sales tax.

But there hasn’t been much open discussion about gambling. There are a lot of factors: the state’s basic conservatism, the buckle on the Bible belt realities, and a general assumption that the state constitution prohibits all legalized gambling, which it doesn’t.

Times change, and old assumptions may no longer be true. Remember that the modern lottery era started in 1964 in New Hampshire because of that state’s famous anti-tax phobia. Now all but two states, Tennessee and Utah, have some form of legalized gambling. Faced with unpopular tax choices, legislators in other states have taken the gaming route.

Tennessee most likely will join the ranks of gambling states a year from now, when a constitutional amendment authorizing a state lottery is on the ballot. For more than a decade, polls have shown that roughly two-thirds of Tennesseans want a lottery.

Despite some beliefs to the contrary, the lottery won’t have much impact on the state’s budget problems. First, it will produce only about $200 million annually in taxes at a time when Tennessee stares at a billion dollar budget shortfall. And the money is earmarked for college scholarships.

Given the legislature’s recent record of robbing Peter to pay Paul, it isn’t impossible that lawmakers will raid higher education funds and rationalize that the lottery tuition money will make up the difference.

The issue of tax reform has now gotten ensnarled with a constitutional convention. Many senators are insisting that an income tax must be followed or preceded by a constitutional convention on the subject, which would give voters a say in the issue.

The lottery referendum next year purports to outlaw casinos, but that could easily be undone with a convention.

There is no real reason why a convention couldn’t be authorized to consider casino gambling at the same time as taxes. It could be posed as an either/or proposition. Or, gambling could be placed on the ballot as a separate issue. But it’s intriguing to ponder what Tennesseans would do if given the choice between an income tax and casinos.

Is there enough money involved for legalized gambling to make a dent in the state’s budget problems? You bet.

Casinos paid $3.5 billion in state and local taxes last year. Americans are now spending as much in casinos as they do playing golf or watching cable television. Mississippi casinos paid $320 million in taxes last year, a partial reason why that state has been able to afford a $10,000 jump in teacher salaries.

That is the direct impact. Mississippi casinos also provide 34,000 jobs and a tourism industry where there was none. Perhaps half the players in Mississippi on a given day live in Tennessee.

Then there is the matter of video poker. New technology has made the monitoring and tax collection problems easy to handle. Video poker makes little casinos out of every convenience store and bar, and some experts think it could produce $400 million annually in Tennessee.

(Video poker, however, has been called the crack cocaine of gambling. South Carolina recently dropped it after the industry had corrupted huge chunks of the state’s politics).

Legalized gambling is distasteful to many in this state, including me. One distinction is that the lottery would be sponsored by state government; casinos, presumably, would be run by private business. Still, reality is reality. No Tennessean is now more than three hours from a casino. Or three clicks of the mouse from a Caribbean gambling den.

The voices calling for a constitutional convention on taxes generally are those who oppose gambling most strongly–conservatives with links to fundamentalist religious groups. They can’t have it both ways.

A constitutional convention on the income tax isn’t necessary, according to many of the state’s top lawyers. Passing taxes should be a legislative responsibility.

The convention is a way to shift the burden away from the General Assembly. If the legislature begins to cede its powers to public referendum in the form of a constitutional convention, it should allow the voters to have the widest possible latitude. And that includes casinos.

Categories
News News Feature

COUNCIL, PBA AGREE ON BROADENING ARENA INVOLVEMENT

Issues of political equity arose as Public Building Authority chairman Arnold Perl and other PBA members appeared before the Memphis City Council Tuesday during the council’s committee-meeting period to discuss progress on the design and construction of the proposed basketball arena.

Perl introduced Don Smith, the newly named executive director for the arena and outlined what he said were “the seven principles” currently guiding the Authority. (These were: 1) to assemble the best team; 2) to build on time and within budget; 3) to maximize minority participation; 4) to “design it right;” 5) to gain public trust; 6) to involve the community; 7) to exceed expectations.)

At one point during the meeting City Councilman Rickey Peete drew analogies between the arena project and the Hartsfield International Airport building expansion undertaken by the city of Atlanta in the 1960’s — specifically noting the effect that project had on Atlanta’s minority contractors.

“I’m not going to be satisfied with only 10 percent or even only 15 percent minority involvement on this project,” said Peete.

Perl agreed that the arena project does provide opportunities for business owned by minorities and women to prosper and said that Memphis could use the project to improve the city’s image.

“Is Memphis as good as Atlanta?,” Perl asked rhetorically. “Memphis’ airport is better than Atlanta’s. Why can’t we do the arena like we’ve done our airport? There’s no reason why we can’t.”

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

LOOK, MA, NO REPUBLICANS!

Irony of ironies: the Shelby County Republican Party, which hit its high-water mark eight years ago when it elected a GOP mayor, two-term incumbent Jim Rout, now seemingly has nobody willing to run for the office.

Rout said months ago he wouldn’t run again. District Attorney General Bill Gibbons decided against a race two weeks ago; former city councilman followed over the weekend; and State Senator Mark Norris, who had been emerging as the newest consensus nominee, said no Tuesday morning.

Later Tuesday, city councilman Jack Sammons and outgoing Shelby County Commissioner Buck Wellford also made clear they would decline the opportunity.

All of them, either publicly or privately, alluded to the huge problems facing the county financially, to its diminished resources, to the meager powers available to a county mayor (especially over two problem areas, the Shelby County school system and the county jail), to the demographic shifts which are inexorably creating a Democratic voting majority, and to the appeal which Democratic candidates already in the field might have along the Poplar Corridor, an area which a successful Republican would need to do well in.

Democrats A C Wharton, the Shelby Public Defender, and Harold Byrd, a banker and former state representative from Bartlett, have acknowledged support in the county’s business community, and another Democrat, State Representative Carol Chumney of Midtown, counts on votes from women across party lines.

When he conducted last week’s monthly meeting of the Shelby County GOP’s steering committee, party chairman Alan Crone had just learned of Bobango’s decision. Somewhat wanly, he said to the committee, “If anybody here wants to run for county mayor, would you see me after the meeting?”

It may come down to Crone himself, who said this week that, if push came to shove, he’d consider running. Other possibilities include Commissioner Tommy Hart and city councilman Brent Taylor, who had already raised a sizeable campaign war chest in hopes of mounting a race for Ed Bryant‘s 7th District congressional seat, deferred indefinitely after Fred Thompson decided to stay in the Senate and Bryant decided to stay where he was, too.