Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

thursday, 7

UNIVERSITY OF MEMHIS, Main stage, Showing through Saturday, November 9th: The Shape of Things, a play that asks the question, “How much would you change about yourself for the one you love?”

ALBERS FINE ART GALLERY, through December 6th, oil-on-canvas urban landscapes by Brent Hooper.

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

HOW IT LOOKS

Categories
News News Feature

CITY BEAT

ELECTION 2002 AWARDS

What kind of election was it? A memorable one, of course. They all are.

The print edition of the Flyer went to press on election day, when the votes hadn’t even been cast much less counted. Still, some awards were due.

Worst attack ad: The one questioning the moral values of Arkansas Democratic Senate candidate Mark Pryor and linking him to flag burning. More proof that the sole purpose of proposed anti flag-burning laws and constitutional amendments is to provide ammunition for political attacks. What made this one weird is that Pryor’s opponent, Tim Hutchinson, is a former minister who three years ago divorced his wife of 29 years to marry a much younger aide.

Best change in election laws: Next year the Campaign Reform Act will put an end to unidentified “soft” money for attack ads in federal elections. “If people are going to attack they need to have the guts to identify themselves,” says pollster Berje Yacoubian.

Biggest winner: Television stations reaped an advertising windfall in an ad recession thanks to candidates who bought more time than Corey B. Trotz.

Worst image in a positive ad: Democratic Senate candidate Bob Clement square dancing. The glasses, the big cheeks, the silly grin. And just a guess, but he looks like a non-dancer.

Worst image in an attack ad: Lamar Alexander in sunglasses in black and white. Amazing what a pair of shades and a receding hairline can do to a cleancut image.

Bad words: HMO, TennCare, Sundquist. Millionaire CEO.

Good word: Veteran.

Most interesting proposals in other states with fiscal problems: Ohio voters weighed in on gambling (video slots at racetracks), while the Republican candidate for governor of Arizona proposed selling off the downtown state fairgrounds in Phoenix for $75 million for 96 acres.

Biggest demographic anomaly: The lottery would benefit college students, but according to Census 2000, only 20 percent of Tennesseans are college grads, and Tennessee ranks 45th among states in percentage of population over age 25 that are high school grads.

Most skewed view: Memphis and Shelby County look less like the rest of Tennessee every year. Tennessee is 80 percent white, 16 percent black, and so strongly Republican that native son Al Gore couldn’t win the state in the 2000 presidential election. Shelby County is evenly divided black and white, and a black Democrat, A C Wharton, crushed a white Republican in the last county election.

Best campaign tactic: Lottery proponent Steve Cohen attending his opponents’ press conferences. He got to hear their claims immediately and unfiltered, and the media often let him respond on the spot. Few politicians are better than Cohen at getting free media time.

Most overexposed: Steve Cohen. This goes along with crashing the press conferences of your opponents. Where were the testimonials from other politicians and college administrators? Cohen’s challenge was to press the issue without becoming the issue, but he sometimes seemed to do just that.

Most overrated factor: Money. Clever candidates can get free publicity, and some are better off with less publicity, not more. Former Shelby County Mayor Jim Rout had over $500,000 in surplus campaign contributions he could have given to Republican candidates. Rout did support Lamar Alexander and Van Hilleary but still has over $400,000 to give to charity or use in future elections.

Most underrated factor: Endorsements. The Big Three of Memphis and Shelby County, mayors Herenton and Wharton and Congressman Harold Ford Jr. logged a lot of air time on behalf of Democrats. All of them enjoy strong bipartisian support in an election where crossover votes were crucial. On the Republican side, only Senator Fred Thompson came close as a power endorsement. Thompson has more statewide appeal than Herenton, Wharton, and Ford, but few voting precincts in the country are as solidly Democratic as the inner-city precincts in Memphis, where margins of 990-1 have been recorded in presidential and Senate elections. So Bredesen and Clement did what most Democrats do in statewide races; they spent election eve working Memphis.

Least in demand: Gov. Don Sundquist. Both gubernatorial candidates tried to tie their rival to Sundquist in attack ads. So much for putting principle above party, as Sundquist did when he supported a state income tax.

Most unreliable: For weeks anti-lottery lobbyist Michael Gilstrap and his aides asked to come visit the Flyer to meet with editorial staff members. On the chosen date they were no-shows. A belated apology followed, and a promise to reschedule “A.S.A.P.” We’re still waiting.

Worst wording: The lottery amendment, which begins with the proposal “that the period at the end of Article XI Section 5 of the Constitution of Tennessee be changed to a comma . . . “ and goes on and on and on. If the lottery wins, it will be no thanks to such verbiage.

Most paradoxical possibility. University of Memphis political scientist Ken Holland (and possibly others) pointed out that the lottery could lose and still win if more people voted on the proposed amendment than in the governor’s race. If the amendment failed by a narrow margin, the “yeas” could still exceed 50 percent of the total votes for governor.

Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

wednesday, 6

Today s Calvary and the Arts lunchtime concert series artist is Kevin Paige & the W.O.W. Band, followed by the Calvary Waffle Shop serving up corned beef and cabbage downstairs. Tonight, it s the very special duo of Katrina & Rebekah at Newby s. And that, as they say, is that. As always, I really don t care what you do this week, because I don t even know you, and unless you can convince me that G.W. Bush is not going to launch at attack on Luxembourg because of their chocolate resources, I m sure I don t want to meet you. Besides, it s time for me to blow this dump and go write Dr. Gott. Dear, Dr. Gott, my ear just fell off. Any advice?

T.S.

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

SIGNS OF THE TIME:THE LOTTERY VOTE

Flanked by Shelby County Democratic chairman Gale Jones Carson, who added her straightforward endorsement of the lottery referendum on Tuesday’s ballot, state senator Steve Cohen, father of that initiative and its nurturer for 16 long years, warned Monday at a press conference at his Midtown residence that lottery opponents were up to skullduggery as the vote neared.

As a flashing sign in his front window behind him kept cycling from “EDUCATION LOTTERY” to “VOTE” and back again, Cohen charged that Gambling Free Tennessee, the group responsible for a well-funded campaign against the lottery this year, had been operating under the radar of the state’s election code through a shadow corporation known as GFT,Inc., which, he said, was obligated to file financial disclosures and had not done so. The organization, he said, could be a means of cloaking “illegal contributions or some they don’t want to divulge.” Casino interests he named as the most likely possibilities in the latter category, and he brandished a publication put out by Baptist opponents of the lottery which acknowledged that “gambling proponents” were also in opposition to it.

Whether tongue in cheek or not, Cohen said, “It was through divine intervention that we learned of this today [Monday] and not tomorrow.”

On Tuesday, as rains threatened to hold down voter turnout, Cohen was still on the case, gong from polling place to polling place and reporting, to his consternation, that Sycamore View Church of Christ, had a flashing sign, too, saying “VOTE NO ON LOTTERY” across the church’s marquee. “It’s digital. It works off a computer” a church secretary noted proudly, and in that sense the opposition had something of a lead on Cohen, whose own flashing sign at home had a homespun, neon look..

The polls, however, were still telling a different story, predicting by leads ranging from minute to considerable, that the lottery, whose proceeds would benefit a scholarship fund, would prevail.

Following is the editorial published in last week’s Flyer on the lottery question:

The Lottery’s a Good bet

When we made the decision back in 1990 (the second year of the Flyer‘s existence) to exhaustively cover the various elections of that year, we made a second, related decision: While we would neither dissemble on matters of public import nor attempt to conceal our attitude, we would not tell our readers how to vote.

We have reconsidered our nonendorsement policy from time to time but, ultimately, have found no cause to reverse it. The unexpected good service of some elected officials and the unanticipated follies of others have, in fact, underscored the soundness of our original judgment on the matter.

But the current debate over the lottery referendum on the November 5th ballot touches on matters so much larger than the specific language or limited intent of the initiative itself that we find we must have our say in the matter.

We are partly emboldened to do so because the organized secular opponents of the lottery made a cynical judgment months ago that if they could make the lottery’s chief exponent for the last two decades — state Senator Steve Cohen — the issue and proceed to besmirch his character, they had the battle as good as won. (We’re not making this up; it’s in black and white in a manifesto meant to be circulated only among lottery opponents but which fortunately leaked to the outside world.)

Senator Cohen may have his foibles, like the rest of us, but we only commend his steadfast pursuit of his goal, his overcoming of intractable legislative opposition, and his good-faith willingness to refine the issue. The lottery proposal that ultimately passed the legislature stands to benefit public education, in emulation of Georgia’s highly successful Hope scholarships, which are funded by that state’s lottery.

Senator Cohen has argued trenchantly that the lottery debate is a reprise of those controversies that, in earlier generations, raged concerning female suffrage, integrated lunch counters, rock-and-roll, and the like. Civilization did not decline with the advent of the aforementioned; it measurably improved and strengthened itself. Cohen has persuasively disputed opponents’ arguments that mainly the poor would patronize the lottery, that the sons and daughters of the middle class would be the exclusive beneficiaries of lottery-funded scholarships, or that public interest in the lottery would wane, requiring larger payoffs, more inventive offerings, and increasingly desperate efforts by the state to entice potential customers. He cites figures from the Georgia experience that indicate the reverse of all these tendencies.

The opponents of the lottery are on firmer ground when they question the extent to which the state would actually benefit financially. In truth, Tennessee’s ongoing fiscal dilemma is severe enough that lottery proceeds might be a relative drop in the bucket of need. But that’s no reason to let the cup pass from our lips.

As for the argument that a lottery would corrupt the state or subvert our public morals — please. Tunica, Mississippi, a few scant miles to the south, is already catering to our citizens’ gaming appetites (as has the dog track in neighboring West Memphis, Arkansas) and has so far neglected to channel the proceeds back into Tennessee education or any other publicly useful purpose.

The lottery is, in the best sense, a forward step. It is the right move at the right time for the people of Tennessee, and we think a vote for it is both positive and timely.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

TRANSLATION: MEMPHIS: Looking at the Lottery

When I was a kid, back in New Jersey, I was always entranced by the lottery.

No, I didn’t gamble. In fact, I can count on one hand the number of times that I’ve tossed my money into the winds of chance, hope, and government sponsored “luck.”

But there was something about the way those numbered balls floated above their fans. Vanna-esque women, with a swoop of the hand, would press a button and voila! Suddenly the fated numbers of pick-3, 5, or 6 would be determined, and people all across the state would look hard at their tickets, ecstatic or more likely, chagrined.

How fast the golden ticket can become tarnished.

For me, though, it was all about watching how something completely random can create value. Floating numbers in the cosmos of chance that land and become something much more concrete.

The opportunity to win or lose.

It is with those images in mind that I have observed the amazing controversy over the proposed legalization of a lottery in Tennessee.

I’m not going to voice my opinion one way or the other, largely because I’m somewhat undecided on the issue, and also because I have no vested interest in attempting to sway you one way or the other.

However, I would like to comment on the structure of the debate as I’ve seen it go on around me for the last several weeks.

One of the major complaints that many disenfranchised voters express about the candidate races is that they are presented with little, if any, concrete information in. In exchange, they are presented with a lot of mudslinging and he said, she said bickering.

When personalities are involved, I suppose that’s inevitable.

But when it comes to a decision on the lottery issue, it seems to me that a bit more depth would be appropriate, pro or con.

On the one hand we’ve seen the largely church-driven opposition, decrying the lottery on the basis of its immorality. On the other hand we have the pro-lottery advocates, led by Senator Steve Cohen, who penned the debated amendment to the Tennessee Constitution that would make the lottery a possibility.

At heart, there are some concrete peripheral issues that should have made this debate both lively and thought provoking.

As far as I have seen this has not happened.

While the faith-based contention that God would not vote for a lottery is interesting, and certainly valid for those who follow the particular God being referenced, it isn’t enough in a free society to justify the stance that the lottery would be wrong for everybody.

Similarly, Cohen’s repeated retort that to not support the lottery is “crazy” lacks a bit in the depth of argument department. To be completely honest, I also find that language to be a little bit irresponsible.

What we’ve ended up with here is a public debate of “God says no,” versus “you’re crazy not to say yes,” which has left the voter with less time to chew on the actual implications of voting no or yes, and more time to ponder their faith or sanity. I don’t expect everybody to agree with me here, but both considerations sort of miss the point.

How about analyzing whether we have any good alternatives to acquiring the funding for education that the lottery might provide? Or, alternately, why not spend one’s debate time considering the economic status of the proposed lottery’s players, and the impact that it might have upon them?

Both of these points have been raised at one point or another, but it seems that too much of the public dialogue on the matter has been a bit lacking in depth.

For those of you who are reading this on Wednesday, the debate has already been settled, at least for now

Let’s hope, though, that the acquisition of the information used to make that choice was not, itself, a game of chance.

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

POLITICS: Local Colors

LOCAL COLORS

MEMPHIS — Bill Gibbons, the District Attorney General in these parts and a man prominent in this year’s Republican political races, especially that of Lamar Alexander’s for the U.S. Senate, had a secret to confide Monday night, as Alexander, accompanied by outgoing Senator Fred Thompson, staged his last rally before the local GOP faithful at the new Holiday Inn on Central Avenue.

The secret was this: Memphis Mayor Willie Herenton, a nominal Democrat who was supporting his party’s candidate for governor, former Nashville mayor Phil Bredesen, but had been lending serious indirect support to Alexander in his campaign against Democratic Senate candidate Bob Clement, would be playing a major role on Alexander’s behalf Monday night.

Our city’s African-American mayor had agreed, said Gibbons, to introduce Alexander at his expected victory celebration in Nashville.

Not only might Herenton’s emergence as an open and declared ally of the Republican conceivably transform partisan politics in Tennessee, it also was one more factor illustrating the unusual prominence of Memphis and Shelby County in shaping this year’s election results.

In fact, the political year 2002 saw all the major statewide campaigns converge on Memphis as election day drew near, a reminder to those with long memories of days of yore, when the city and its environs loomed disproportionately large on the state scene.

That was the time, during the long rule of Edward Hull Crump over the political affairs of Memphis and Shelby County from the late –20s through the mid-Ô50s, that statewide elections might be conducted across the breadth and length of Tennessee but they were decided right here, on the banks of the Mississippi.

“Boss Crump” and “Big Shelby” were virtually synonymous terms indicating the extent of the domination of the rest of Tennessee by its southwest corner. With rare exceptions, governors and senators were designated by Memphis’ long-term political machine. As one example, Gordon Browning, a native of the West Tennessee town of Huntington, had been an intimate of Crump’s and was first elected governor, with the Great Man’s say-so, in the late ‘30s.

Browning had an independent streak, however, and he kept bristling at the idea of being considered Boss Crump’s puppet; so he kept falling in and out of favor with Crump, and the last time he won election, in 1948, it was in direct opposition to Crump’s handpicked man, Jim McCord. That was a time of post-war reform sentiment, late in the reign of Boss Crump, however, and Browning was able to win an upset. (A Tennessee presidential contender — first of a long series to come — was voted in the same year and the same; in a three-cornered race, Estes Kefauver defeated Crump’s man for the Senate, John A. Mitchell.)

That seemed to be that, except that Boss Crump, not quite in his dotage, was determined not to be bested, and had discovered an ambitious young war veteran in Dickson named Frank Clement, and, more or less as his last piece of power brokering in this life, boosted Clement against the man he considered a renegade and won handily.

Crump was able to see Clement relected one more time, in 1954, the year he died.

And, though there were various free-lance efforts by various of his former associates to re-tool the machine and maintain its dominance, E.H. Crump had named his last state leader, and, so, it would seem, had any force emanating from Memphis and Shelby County.

To be sure, a Shelby Countian, Dr. Winfield Dunn, a Republican, was elected governor in 1970, over Democrat John Jay Hooker of Nashville, but that victory arose not so much out of a local power base as it did from the tide of Southern Republicanism, which had begun in the aftermath of the civil rights revolution, finally washing into Tennessee. (All previous statewide elections, at least in the 20th century, had been decided in the Democratic primaries.) And the then young and dynamic Hooker happened also to have suffered some embarrassing business losses which tarnished his reputation and made voters look to an unknown.

And even Dunn decided to tarry in Nashville, the state capital, after leaving office in 1975. He is virtually an unknown figure in Memphis today, though the U-T college of medicine here is named for him, and that fact symbolizes Memphis’ exclusion from the political center as much as anything else in the post-Crump era.

When Nashville congressman Bob Clement, this year’s Democratic nominee, was struggling this fall to rise in the polls against former governor Alexander, he lamented, “If only we had the same kind of name recognitionÉ” For a scion of the family which had once dominated state politics after that initial boost from Boss Crump, it was an ironic confession and a sign of different times.

But the return of Clement, a frequent visitor, to Memphis this past weekend was another sign — one perhaps indicating the the Bluff City is, once again, where statewide leaders are confirmed.

“Shelby County is where it’s at,” said Clement Sunday night by way of explaining his presence here for much of the last weekend and for the last whole day before Tuesday’s statewide election which would, of course, decide his personal and political fate.

Clement, the Democratic congressman from Nashville’s 5th District, was well aware that the smart money and the pollsters had made Republican opponent Lamar Alexander a prohibitive favorite to win the Senate seat being vacated by the GOP’s Fred Thompson, and he had to have noticed that none of the network political talk shows had his race on their boards for discussion on Sunday.

But he soldiered on, showing up for a packed party in his honor at the Midtown home of activist David Upton , and his good-nature and dogged determinination shone through. Acknowledging the presence of his party’s 7th District nominee, Tim Barron, Clement told the crowd, “He’ll be around awhile,” and the crowd’s brisk applause for the prospect of Barron’s enduring as a political presence past the likely worst-case-scenario barely concealed a pang for veteran Clement, who was not likely to be so fortunate in the case of defeat.

“We’re going to win!” said one of his volunteer aides, Debbie Johnson, when asked to estimate the outcome, and her eyes shone with conviction, and Clement himself would nod sagely later on when reminded that the ultimate science might not reside with the pollsters, who have showed Clement anywhere from 6 to 12 point behind Alexander in the last week, but with the spirit of Werner Heisenberg, whose Uncertainty Principle established the preeminence of the observer, mayhap even the participant, in wrenching fate out of its seemingly predetermined paths.

And Shelby County, with its mass of black (i.e.,Democratic) voters and, for that matter, with its teeming suburban white (i.e, Republican) blocs, had become a special target for the major candidates in both parties in this last week of campaigning. The bottom line was this: Democratic candidates were dependent on Memphis’ large inner-city black vote; Republican office-seekers needed to whet up the equally huge suburban white vote. Either bloc could be crucial to a candidate’s hopes for success.

They had all been here over and over of late. Van Hilleary, the GOP candidate for governor, made a brief stopover Saturday night at the Republicans’ East Memphis “Victory 2000” headquarters with Sen. Bill Frist, and he asserted, “This is my fifth trip here in the last week, and I’m coming back Monday.” (Actually, he came only so near as Covington, where he did his best to rouse the distant suburban expatriates who in recent years have made south Tipton County a Republican bailiwick and whom state House Speaker made sure to cut loose from his district during the most recent reapportionment..)

GOP Senate candidate Alexander had been much in evidence the previous weekend, doing a two- or three-day stopover and making much the same point as would Clement, that Shelby County has the votes that would make the difference in this election. He was back again Monday night for a last rally at the Holiday Inn on Central Avenue, appearing with outgoing Senator Fred Thompson and making sure his listeners among the local Republican faithful were aware that he had chosen Memphis as his final venue on purpose.

As Clement — who made his last visit here Monday at an airport rally for Democratic gubernatorial candidate Phil Bredesen, prepared by Memphis’ other major Democratic force, the Ford family — had done earlier, Alexander noted that Memphis had perhaps not received enough stroking from government, and promised to help remedy that.

And so, of course, did Bredesen, who has been back-and-forth to the Bluff City enough times — always praising its “vibrance,” even at the expense of Nashville, the city he led in recent years — to claim honorary citizenship.

The same could be said, even more firmly, for Marsha Blackburn, the GOP’s 7th District nominee and so confident of a victory over Democrat Tim Barron that she spent much of her time campaigning for local Republican nominees for other offices. Blackburn had, in fact, taken a residence on Highway 64 in Cordova for the duration.

And then there was the one exponent of a major statewide campaign who lived here.. That was Steve Cohen, Memphis’ midtown state senator, who, though not a candidate himself this year, was virtually synonymous with the cause of the lottery referendum. He, too, was heard from locally in these last day.

Flanked by Shelby County Democratic chairman Gale Jones Carson, who added her straightforward endorsement of the lottery referendum on Tuesday’s ballot, Cohen, father of that initiative and its nurturer for 16 long years, warned Monday at a press conference at his Midtown residence that lottery opponents were up to skullduggery as the vote neared.

As a flashing sign in his front window behind him kept cycling from “EDUCATION LOTTERY” to “VOTE” and back again, Cohen charged that Gambling Free Tennessee, the group responsible for a well-funded campaign against the lottery this year, had been operating under the radar of the state’s election code through a shadow corporation known as GFT,Inc., which, he said, was obligated to file financial disclosures and had not done so.

The organization, he said, could be a means of cloaking “illegal contributions or some they don’t want to divulge.” Casino interests he named as the most likely possibilities in the latter category, and he brandished a publication put out by Baptist opponents of the lottery which acknowledged that “gambling proponents” were also in opposition to it.

Whether tongue in cheek or not, Cohen said, “It was through divine intervention that we learned of this today [Monday] and not tomorrow.”

On Tuesday, as rains threatened to hold down voter turnout, Cohen was still on the case, gong from polling place to polling place and reporting, to his consternation, that Sycamore View Church of Christ, had a flashing sign, too, saying “VOTE NO ON LOTTERY” across the church’s marquee. “It’s digital. It works off a computer” a church secretary noted proudly, and in that sense the opposition had something of a lead on Cohen, whose own flashing sign at home had a homespun, neon look.

All the same, Cohen’s neon sign was a throwback to a former time, one in which Memphis personalities, Memphis interests, and Memphis constituencies loomed large in state affairs, and a time, in fact, which may have returned.

Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

tuesday, 5

Vote for the lottery. It s the only thing on the ballot except for Harold Ford, Jr. that s not covered in mud in light of the recent campaign.

Categories
News News Feature

FROM MY SEAT

IRKSOME ISSUES

With pitchers and catchers not scheduled to report for another three-and-a-half months, I’ve been in a foul sports mood of late. Time to get a few things off my chest.

  • “Four-peat” after me . . . . With the NBA season upon us, and the mighty Lakers aiming for their fourth straight title, this obnoxious expression has taken hold of sportswriters and sportscasters like an annoying facial twitch. It was somewhat cute the first time Michael Jordan’s Bulls pulled off a “three-peat” (at least the synthetic noun/verb included its origin). Not anymore. How about this: next time a team manages what Bill Russell’s Celtics did during the Sixties, I’ll authorize the use of the word, “eight-peat.” Until then, spare us.

  • “We’re taking the season one game at a time.” Sports clichés are somewhat similar to raking leaves in the fall: a necessary annoyance we suffer for a larger purpose. But this one has got to go. If someone can show me the first athlete to play TWO games at the same time . . . I’ll concede this expression as an informative slice of jock analysis. Otherwise, why not tell us you put on one sneaker at a time? One glove at a time?

  • Grisly grammar. It started the first time I read a Memphis Grizzlies press release that made reference to a “Grizzlie.” Then there was the confusion over our NBA team’s abbreviated nickname: “Griz” in the local and national press, “Grizz” according to the team’s marketing staff. Finally, we have the FedExForum. Three words, two of them abbreviated, no space . . . ahhh! I’m not sure if the Grizzlies need Jerry West or Mrs. Hockenbury, my sophomore English teacher.

  • BCS B.S. Take it from a sportswriter who loves numbers. Statistics will tell you only what the statistician wants you to know. The various

    algorithms, equations, and permutations that make up the Bowl Championship Series ratings system for college football is an atrocity. If Joe Six-Pack can’t wake up Sunday morning and do the math over breakfast, well, Oz remains behind the curtain. If Miami and/or Oklahoma slips ever so slightly (read: one loss between them), you can be certain Notre Dame will do some leapfrogging and gain a slot in this year’s “championship game,” the Fiesta Bowl. If you don’t believe this, I’ve got a seat for you at the “Televison Ratings Are Everything” annual conference, to be held at Disneyland and sponsored, of course, by ABC.

  • Roster baggage at U of M. I’ve got nothing personal against John Grice or Chris Massie. But what are these guys doing at the Larry Finch

    Center? Massie made the ill-advised decision to test the NBA draft . . . trouble is, no NBA team chose to test Massie. He’s academically ineligible for the fall semester and will need to pull off the classroom equivalent of a triple-double to play in January. Grice is in his third year as a Tiger and has played all of eight games due to academic shortcomings. I’d like to think basketball is the lifeline toward a degree for these two. I’m afraid the more likely case is they are poster boys for the kind of player John Calipari should ignore on his recruiting ventures.

  • Big Orange bleating. This is a down year for University of Tennessee football. But with the outcry and rails against everyone from Kelley Washington to Casey Clausen to Phil Fullmer, you’d think the Arkansas State squad had transferred to Knoxville. The Vols are 5-3, for crying out loud. They have a more than reasonable chance at going 7-5 (maybe even 8-4) and reaching a bowl game for the 14th(!) consecutive season. My father (a UT alum) told me stories about the trials of Bill Battle when the Orange Army got uptight, and I saw firsthand how the legendary Johnny Majors was fitted for a hangman’s noose. Simply put, the sense of entitlement among Tennessee fans gets tiring in the years UT doesn’t put up 10 wins. Want to find a football program to whine about? Visit the Liberty Bowl.

  • Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    SOUND WAVES

    Thaddeus Matthews has never kept his opinions to himself. Since his radio rebirth this year, the talk-show host has unceasingly broadcast his disdain for the Shelby County Democratic Party, its effectiveness, and its leadership, thereby angering many of the city’s political leaders. For the sound of Matthews in action, CLICK HERE

    Matthews’ show Express Yourself on Flinn Broadcasting’s WTCK AM-1210 is, in his opinion, all about informing the public, specifically African Americans, of their rights as voters and the need for candidate accountability. “One of my strongest statements on the air is that ‘the black politician or leader who is not working for the betterment of African Americans is more dangerous to us than any white politician could ever be,'” said Matthews. “We have a dumbing-down from our politicians. We only see them when they want to be elected … and that’s the large majority of our leadership. They come, they beg for our vote and for our money, then, once elected, they forget about the people who placed them there.”

    The daily program, which airs from noon to 2 p.m., has broached topics that Matthews says are not popular in the black community, such as allowing convicted criminals and recovering drug offenders to be reelected to public office. He cites the reelections of city councilman Rickey Peete after his conviction for taking bribes and county commissioner Michael Hooks after admitting to drug addiction. “I think that a lot of our black leadership has built their prominence on the backs of economically depressed people,” said Matthews. “Most radio talk-show hosts, black anyway, will not say that, whether for fear of retaliation or whether they too are a part of the network.”

    But not everyone is a fan of Matthews’ “truth in politics” broadcasting. Shelby County Democratic Party chairman Gale Jones Carson called Matthews’ tactics “pitiful.” Although she has never heard of Matthews or his program, she said his accusations are baseless. “[Matthews] can think what he wants to, but he should just ask the 16 Democratic candidates who ran August 1st. Get their opinion on the Democratic Party and how effective we were,” she said. “This man needs to talk to some of the candidates before he gets on the air making blanket statements that he can’t back up. Who even listens to 1210? … He probably won’t be on long this time either. People have a right to their opinion, but they ought to be based on facts, and his are not based on facts.”

    During her tenure as chairman, Carson said the party has raised more than $100,000 and run a coordinated campaign for 16 candidates. As a result, she said more African Americans voted in the August election than in any election in the previous five years. “Our candidates may not have won in the numbers that we would have liked them to, but they were closer than they have ever been before. Fifty-three percent of voters in August were Democrats,” she said. “If all the Democrats who had voted had voted the straight party line, all of our countywide candidates would have won. We ran our coordinated campaign unlike we’ve ever done before.”

    Matthews is no newcomer to the radio arena. A lifelong Memphian and assistant pastor of a Whitehaven-area church, he began his radio career in 1985. He became known for his “shock jock” manner and shows with no topic off-limits. A 1993 show on bestiality ended his run on another Memphis station until his return three years ago. That show was canceled due to political content. This time, Matthews is taking no chances. Express Yourself has a solid, one-year contract and is self-financed, with Matthews selling his own advertising. “I think there needs to be someone on the air that is an advocate,” he says.

    Matthews has been joined by another self-proclaimed people’s advocate, Jennings Bernard. Bernard, a long-time candidate for various Shelby County offices, is hosting his own program, following Matthews’ slot. Bernard’s Real Talk airs daily from 2 to 3 p.m. The program follows Bernard’s infamous “Democratic Crackhead” phone line instituted after the August election. It contains a recorded message referring to various Shelby County politicians. The message tells callers that the Democratic Party will accept “crackheads,” “thie[ves],” and “drug addicts” for the offices of city councilman, county commissioner, and county clerk. Callers are then asked to leave their “crackhead phone number.”

    “I looked at some of our elected and selected officials, and I began to wonder about their principles and those by which I was taught. Did they mean anything?” said Bernard. “The only way that I could bring attention to the situation and the principles that I was taught was through the ‘Democratic Crackhead’ number, to allow the people to know who they are selecting. In an imperfect world, we need to see as much righteousness as possible so we can send a message to young people who will one day seek to be Shelby County leaders. When you say that you can betray the voters’ confidence and they will still reelect you, that’s sending the wrong message.”

    Janis Fullilove, Bernard’s county clerk opponent in the Democratic primary, considers the phone line offensive. “I was very offended because he makes reference to me as being a dope addict,” she said. “I considered going to an attorney to bring slander [charges], but then I just dropped it. If he has any anger, it should be against the people who voted, not me.” Fullilove, who is also the talk-show host of WDIA’s Janis Fullilove Unleashed, denied alleged threats made against Bernard and also denied verbal retaliation of Matthews on her show, stating that her only target is fellow talk-show host Mike Fleming of WREC.

    She and Carson agree. “Statements like these do not hurt the Democratic Party. They just make the person appear small-minded because polls now show that negative campaigning is not liked by voters,” said Fullilove. “I’m sure if you look in the background of a Thaddeus Matthews or a Jennings Bernard, they probably have things that they don’t want other people to know about either. Like my grandmother always said, the pot can’t call the kettle black.”

    p>

    Matthews’ show Express Yourself on Flinn Broadcasting’s WTCK AM-1210 is, in his opinion, all about informing the public, specifically African Americans, of their rights as voters and the need for candidate accountability. “One of my strongest statements on the air is that ‘the black politician or leader who is not working for the betterment of African Americans is more dangerous to us than any white politician could ever be,'” said Matthews. “We have a dumbing-down from our politicians. We only see them when they want to be elected … and that’s the large majority of our leadership. They come, they beg for our vote and for our money, then, once elected, they forget about the people who placed them there.”

    The daily program, which airs from noon to 2 p.m., has broached topics that Matthews says are not popular in the black community, such as allowing convicted criminals and recovering drug offenders to be reelected to public office. He cites the reelections of city councilman Rickey Peete after his conviction for taking bribes and county commissioner Michael Hooks after admitting to drug addiction. “I think that a lot of our black leadership has built their prominence on the backs of economically depressed people,” said Matthews. “Most radio talk-show hosts, black anyway, will not say that, whether for fear of retaliation or whether they too are a part of the network.”

    But not everyone is a fan of Matthews’ “truth in politics” broadcasting. Shelby County Democratic Party chairman Gale Jones Carson called Matthews’ tactics “pitiful.” Although she has never heard of Matthews or his program, she said his accusations are baseless. “[Matthews] can think what he wants to, but he should just ask the 16 Democratic candidates who ran August 1st. Get their opinion on the Democratic Party and how effective we were,” she said. “This man needs to talk to some of the candidates before he gets on the air making blanket statements that he can’t back up. Who even listens to 1210? … He probably won’t be on long this time either. People have a right to their opinion, but they ought to be based on facts, and his are not based on facts.”

    During her tenure as chairman, Carson said the party has raised more than $100,000 and run a coordinated campaign for 16 candidates. As a result, she said more African Americans voted in the August election than in any election in the previous five years. “Our candidates may not have won in the numbers that we would have liked them to, but they were closer than they have ever been before. Fifty-three percent of voters in August were Democrats,” she said. “If all the Democrats who had voted had voted the straight party line, all of our countywide candidates would have won. We ran our coordinated campaign unlike we’ve ever done before.”

    Matthews is no newcomer to the radio arena. A lifelong Memphian and assistant pastor of a Whitehaven-area church, he began his radio career in 1985. He became known for his “shock jock” manner and shows with no topic off-limits. A 1993 show on bestiality ended his run on another Memphis station until his return three years ago. That show was canceled due to political content. This time, Matthews is taking no chances. Express Yourself has a solid, one-year contract and is self-financed, with Matthews selling his own advertising. “I think there needs to be someone on the air that is an advocate,” he says.

    Matthews has been joined by another self-proclaimed people’s advocate, Jennings Bernard. Bernard, a long-time candidate for various Shelby County offices, is hosting his own program, following Matthews’ slot. Bernard’s Real Talk airs daily from 2 to 3 p.m. The program follows Bernard’s infamous “Democratic Crackhead” phone line instituted after the August election. It contains a recorded message referring to various Shelby County politicians. The message tells callers that the Democratic Party will accept “crackheads,” “thie[ves],” and “drug addicts” for the offices of city councilman, county commissioner, and county clerk. Callers are then asked to leave their “crackhead phone number.”

    “I looked at some of our elected and selected officials, and I began to wonder about their principles and those by which I was taught. Did they mean anything?” said Bernard. “The only way that I could bring attention to the situation and the principles that I was taught was through the ‘Democratic Crackhead’ number, to allow the people to know who they are selecting. In an imperfect world, we need to see as much righteousness as possible so we can send a message to young people who will one day seek to be Shelby County leaders. When you say that you can betray the voters’ confidence and they will still reelect you, that’s sending the wrong message.”

    Janis Fullilove, Bernard’s county clerk opponent in the Democratic primary, considers the phone line offensive. “I was very offended because he makes reference to me as being a dope addict,” she said. “I considered going to an attorney to bring slander [charges], but then I just dropped it. If he has any anger, it should be against the people who voted, not me.” Fullilove, who is also the talk-show host of WDIA’s Janis Fullilove Unleashed, denied alleged threats made against Bernard and also denied verbal retaliation of Matthews on her show, stating that her only target is fellow talk-show host Mike Fleming of WREC.

    She and Carson agree. “Statements like these do not hurt the Democratic Party. They just make the person appear small-minded because polls now show that negative campaigning is not liked by voters,” said Fullilove. “I’m sure if you look in the background of a Thaddeus Matthews or a Jennings Bernard, they probably have things that they don’t want other people to know about either. Like my grandmother always said, the pot can’t call the kettle black.”