Categories
News The Fly-By

Pell Mell

Jim Shannon handles student financial aid for Christian Brothers University. Lately, his responsibilities have included educating the school’s 1,800 undergraduates on the latest changes in the Pell Grant program. And the news isn’t particularly good.

About 550 CBU undergrads receive the federal grants each year. Under the Bush administration’s proposals to change the allocation amounts and funding formulas, Shannon says some students will lose their money.

“I think what will happen is that those students on the lower end of amount of need will see their grants reduced, but the highest-need students won’t be affected,” Shannon says. “What will be interesting is to see the effect this could have on Tennessee students who also receive state grants, because the [contribution formulas] are taken from the Pell Grant formulas.”

Late last year, President Bush outlined his plans to overhaul the allocation of federal funds to the nation’s college students. In addition to proposing an increase in individual grant amounts, Bush also announced a review of the formulas used in calculating Pell Grant payments.

The federally funded program awards need-based grants from $400 to more than $4,000. To qualify for assistance, students must complete a form noting family income, savings, and other information. These numbers are used to compute a student’s Expected Family Contribution (EFC), the amount a student’s family can contribute to educational expenses. The formulas used in calculating the EFC have remained unchanged since 1988.

The new guidelines would save the government $300 million in 2005-2006, good news for a program that is $4 billion in the red. According to Department of Education administrators, the updated formulas will be based on new tax tables.

More than 86,000 Tennessee students received Pell Grant funds in the 2002-2003 school year, accounting for more than $208 million in Pell payouts. Approximately 90,000 students would be disqualified from Pell funds under the new formula, according to the Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation (TSAC), and 1.3 million students will see a decrease in fund amounts nationwide. According a TSAC statement, “The added pressure of [reducing Pell eligibility] may increase the number of students dropping out of college. [It] may also lead to increased numbers of students borrowing the additional funds needed.”

“The Pell Grant uses a graduated chart, while the Tennessee grant has a more exact cutoff in relating to income contribution,” says Shannon. “If students’ EFCs rise because of this, then more students are likely to be precluded [from the state grant].” At CBU, 275 students received state grants.

Shannon’s concerns are confirmed by TSAC, which estimates that an increased EFC could cause a decrease in private-sector need-based scholarships as well.

Rhodes College financial aid administrator Forrest Stuart says the updated formula is long in coming: “We need to use updated data. The government is not doing this to kick people off the grant rolls. It’s doing it because the law requires it.

“I’m sorry about the effects, but they need to keep the tax tables updated,” Stuart adds. “It’s not fair to everyone involved — taxpayers and students — when we use old data. The DOE should have done something about this a long time ago. It’s not the Republicans jumping on these students.”

At LeMoyne-Owen College, more than 80 percent of undergraduates receive Pell Grants. In other words, of the 800 undergraduate students attending the college, 650 received federal grant allocations. But college administrators say the new funding formulas won’t greatly affect LeMoyne-Owen students.

“February is Financial Aid Awareness Month here at LeMoyne, and we are informing students about Pell changes,” says chief financial officer Tijuana Hudson. “We may see some students affected, but not many.”

Richard Ritzman, who handles financial aid at the University of Memphis, says the new funding formula would probably produce low-impact results. “If the maximum Pell Grant is raised by $100 for the next year (an increase proposed by President Bush for the next five years), it will probably, at best, offset the loss the student would have seen based on the new formula calculations. I have seen proposals come and go every year regarding the federal financial aid programs. In most cases, what is finally enacted, if anything, is quite different from what was originally proposed.”

Categories
Music Record Reviews

Short Cuts

LCD Soundsystem

LCD Soundsystem

(DFA/EMI)

LCD Soundsystem is essentially James Murphy, one half of the production team DFA who have become as towering a duo within their dance-rock corner of the musical world as other production pairs such as the Neptunes and Basement Jaxx.

DFA’s grand achievement is making dance music for an indie-rock subculture typically too self-conscious for such a thing. With irony-free and openhearted concepts too scary for their audience to contemplate, DFA pairs the physicality of their music with snotty vocals that provide enough emotional distance to give indie-rock fans an entry.

But what’s most compelling is how this strategy allows for a critique of itself, something best heard on LCD Soundsystem’s cult 2002 singles “Losing My Edge” and “Beat Connection.” The former pairs its electro bass-and-snare beat with the monotone whine of a vocal that mocks hipster obscurantism and identity crisis. As the groove gets more slinky and more active, the narrator grows more desperate and defensive. Even better is “Beat Connection,” where a four-minute instrumental stretch driven by a rattling, insistent beat pulls the listener in physically before Murphy steps to the pulpit to admonish the limitations his congregation has imposed on itself.

These songs, along with last year’s 20-minute 12-inch “Yeah” (think Fela Kuti for American rock-club regulars) and a couple of shorter tracks, make up the time-capsule-worthy second disc of LCD Soundsytem’s eponymous debut, paired with a first disc of all-new material where Murphy seems to be trying to back away from his self-appointed dance-floor mission. The new stuff is more rock, more new-wave, and less interesting. The funk-forward robot-rock of the cheeky opener, “Daft Punk Is Playing at My House,” portends more disco-punk detonations, but the rest of the record dabbles elsewhere: “Tribulations” grooves on a synth-based rhythm track you could have heard in the background of a John Hughes movie, while “Never As Tired As When I’m Waking Up” and “Great Release” could be classified as art-rock. The result of the new/old pairing is pretty schizophrenic. Call the new record a disappointing B+ and the singles disc an easy A. — Chris Herrington

Grade: A-

DFA Compilation #2

Various Artists

(DFA)

Ten years ago, electronica hype launched an ill-fated invasion on indie-rock culture, leaving behind such barely remembered artifacts as marginal Mo’ Wax releases collecting dust in college-radio record collections, rock-identified Matador Records’ short-lived genre switch, and such idiotically named subgenres as “illbient.”

Half a decade into the new century, indie and dance have come together again in the form of artists such as the Avalanches, Christian Fennesz, and Matmos –and the perhaps unlikely union is much stronger this time around. At the forefront of this happy marriage is DFA, the record label/production team of rock-reared James Murphy and electronic-music vet Tim Goldsworthy.

In transforming previously unremarkable retro-minded post-punk bands such as the Rapture and Radio 4 into dance-floor heroes (especially with the Rapture’s 2002 underground-club smash “House of Jealous Lovers”), DFA established themselves among the most canny producers on the planet, and the three-disc Compilation #2, released late last year, is perhaps the most thorough testament to the duo’s achievement.

The Rapture’s infectious “Alabama Sunshine” is a flawless union of rock and dance. The featured Black Dice tracks are taken from more rhythmic moments, as opposed to the band’s tedious catalog of uneventful improvisation. Black Leotard Front’s “Casual Friday” is a Cinemax After Dark meets Office Space joke set to a live-instrument disco backing that disco-era demigod Nile Rodgers wishes he had penned. Murphy’s own LCD Soundsystem is dependably ass-shaking and omnipresent. And when early-’80s no-wave legends Liquid Liquid show up with “Bellhead” to unite the two scenes, it’s like the past 20 years never happened. n — Andrew Earles

Grade: A-

Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

Sturm und Drang (Shang-a-Lang)

/H2>

In 1986, four years after its modest off-Broadway opening, Little Shop of Horrors — a campy, ’60s pop-inspired creepshow of a musical based on schlock filmmaker Roger Corman’s ultracheap film of the same name — was again transformed into a popular, expensive, and extraordinarily well-made bit of musical cinema starring such known commodities as Rick Moranis, Steve Martin, and Vincent Gardenia.

Set in a hopelessly broken urban landscape where “the hopheads flop in the snow,” the film flirted hard with the play’s original themes: addiction, sadistic relationships, greed, and mankind’s eminent corruptibility. But Hollywood wasn’t ready to bank on a zany comedy where all the characters are ultimately devoured by a flesh-eating plant bent on world conquest, so the ending was altered. In typical comic-book fashion, the boy got the girl, the monster got blown up, and all of the baddies got what was coming to them. And so the play’s greatest irony was rendered impotent.

Little Shop‘s chorus, three cool black chicks more Motown than Greek, provide the framework for this candy-coated, but politically savvy, morality tale. In an often-reprised number, they sing about “the meek,” who, according to the often-quoted (and perhaps misinterpreted) Bible verse, will someday inherit the earth:

They say the meek shall inherit — You know the book doesn’t lie

It’s not a question of merit; it’s not demand and supply

You know the meek are gonna get what’s coming to them by and by.

In the stage version of Little Shop, the meekest characters are used, abused, and ultimately eaten as they feed any number of beasts: the market, the media, the status quo, and eventually Audrey II, a blood-sucking, limb-chomping plant discovered by supergeek Seymour Krelbourn, a mild-mannered skid-row florist with a slim-to-no chance of ever pulling himself out of the gutter. Grim metaphors are piled up like syrup-drenched pancakes — an exhilarating, relatively low-budget antidote to the coked-up, trickle-down ’80s, an era famous for glorifying corporate ruthlessness and rampant consumerism.

From the end of the 1980s and throughout the 1990s, Little Shop was produced frequently by regional theaters across the country and at least five times in Memphis. A recent Broadway revival, criticized by some for its lack of intimacy, has pumped new life into a production well on its way to becoming an old warhorse. It has done so at a time when the conditions that made the play so prescient in the 1980s have returned, and in force.

The Broadway tour of Little Shop of Horrors opened at The Orpheum February 15th and runs through February 20th.

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

More Ford

Last week, we began what will be a continuing examination of the forthcoming U.S. Senate race of 9th District congressman Harold Ford.

In Ford’s case, as in that of his Democratic primary opponent, state representative Rosalind Kurita of Clarksville, and in those of the several Republican hopefuls now in the field, we intend to look beyond and beneath the PR statements, position papers, and stump platitudes for a nitty-gritty take on the candidates’ persona and politics.

Promise: In all instances, you will get the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. No spin, no kowtowing, and no shying away from either positives or negatives.

First, the good news for Ford: Despite the widely held belief of some, mainly local, observers that Ford’s race will be handicapped by 1) his race and 2) bad publicity about his uncle, state senator John Ford, my interviews and observations statewide over the years have not borne out that concern.

In 15 years of reporting state and local politics, I have yet to hear the first disparaging comment about Ford that is race-based — even from the kind of thinly reconstructed types one might expect that from. And as Ed Cromer, the respected editor of the Nashville-based Tennessee Journal says, “I think that, even with the kind of bad publicity that John Ford is in for now, people will be able to distinguish between the nephew and the uncle.” As if to make doubly sure, the congressman has repeatedly made remarks distancing himself from his uncle (something, John Ford’s intimates say, that the currently beleaguered state senator isn’t crazy about).

More good news: It is no secret that the congressman has proved a fascinating figure for much of the national and statewide media, and in his race he can expect the kind of lavish attention that was given the Senate races of candidates like Hillary Clinton in New York and Barack Obama in Illinois.

There’s bad news that comes with this good news, however: As we have noted, and as others are likely to discover, the congressman’s reactions to news coverage are sometimes impulsive and even, when he doesn’t like the facts reported, characterized by kill-the-messenger tendencies.

Two years ago, when another writer for this newspaper pointed out, accurately, that Ford’s local supporters were supporting state representative Kathryn Bowers, the eventual winner for local Democratic chairman, the congressman, looking ahead to his statewide race and no doubt galvanized by fear of party division, reacted swiftly and angrily. He repudiated the effort of his minions and made a point of endorsing then chairman Gale Jones Carson.

Complicating the issue was the fact that Carson doubled as press secretary for Mayor Willie Herenton, who has never been close to the Ford political clan.

Though Ford’s local supporters sucked it up and kept their peace publicly, several of them simmered privately and insisted that the congressman himself had initially signed off on their pro-Bowers efforts. One or two of them had serious words with Ford over the matter.

Ford’s composure under fire is sure to be tested in a Senate race. Kurita herself has a reputation for tenacious, even bare-knuckled campaigning, and, assuming Ford gets by her, he can surely expect some heavy weather from the eventual Republican nominee. As Cromer says, “No doubt about it. He’s never had to endure the kind of stressful opposition he can expect in a Senate race, and that could be a problem for him.”

Even Ford’s well-established celebrity glow could turn into a hindrance. Two recent items in Roll Call, the widely read Capitol Hill newsletter, began to highlight Ford’s private life. One called attention to his conspicuous presence at a lavish party thrown by Playboy magazine during Super Bowl week. Another made fun of his penchant for regular pedicures.

Though he was briefly engaged some years ago, Ford does not have the kind of visible ties to a Significant Other that Tennesseans will see in the case of his various opponents. This fact might even help him with some younger voters, however.

One other potential obstacle for Ford: A number of state Democrats were unsettled by Ford’s protracted dawdling over a potential 2000 campaign for the Senate seat of Bill Frist — the same one that Frist will vacate and Ford intends to seek next year.

Still other Democrats were miffed by what they saw as the inattention of Ford, a national co-chair of John Kerry’s campaign, to the Democratic nominee’s race in Tennessee. One major-county liaison official communicated misgivings about Ford to the Kerry campaign at the highest level.

For all that, no one doubts that Representative Ford, an undeniably dynamic figure, is likely to energize the Tennessee Democratic base in ways beyond the ability of the party’s Senate nominees of the past decade or more. And this too will be spoken to here. Stay tuned.

Bowers Gets Feisty

Alternating between irony and promises of sustained direct action, state representative. Kathryn Bowers, chairman of the legislative TennCare Oversight Committee, vowed Sunday to continue resisting Governor Phil Bredesen‘s recently announced TennCare cuts and to try to maintain the state-run insurance system as close to its current level of enrollees as possible.

Bowers appeared, along with Nell Levin of the Tennessee Alliance for Progress and Beverly Owens of Tennesseans for Fair Taxation, at the monthly meeting of the Public Issues Forum at the Central Library.

Maintaining that Bredesen’s reforms amounted to “telling people to jump before they’ve got a safety net set up,” Bowers concurred with attendees who said the proposed Bredesen cuts threatened their very lives. Paying homage to Judge William J. Haynes Jr., the Middle Tennessee federal jurist who last month issued an order delaying the cuts, Bowers said, “Thank God for Judge Haynes. We’re not going to sit on our hands and let them take 323,000 people off the rolls.”

Attributing to the governor and his aides variations on the mockingly enunciated refrain “We don’t know yet,” the diminutive state representative said Bredesen had acted before possessing reliable estimates of the economic and health costs to Tennesseans. She said she would organize groups of citizens to come to the General Assembly and lobby legislators against the Bredesen reforms.

Judge Haynes has meanwhile set a March 28th hearing to determine whether the governor’s plan is in compliance with federal consent decrees. And the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled an April 26th hearing to review the matter. Some news reports indicate that key legislators are considering seeking a monthlong recess, pending the outcome of the two hearings.

Levin said she thought public reaction to the governor’s proposals would be bad politically for Bredesen, who has recently been mentioned by national magazines as a potential 2008 presidential contender. Owens said she thought the TennCare issue might once again revive prospects for a state income tax, but Bowers, who intends to run for the state Senate seat vacated recently by Roscoe Dixon, now a Shelby County governmental aide, said she thought the income tax was a dead issue.

She touted instead a measure introduced jointly by herself and state senator Steve Cohen that would raise cigarette taxes enough to pay for maintaining the current level of TennCare enrollment.

n Bowers v. Hooks v. Chism v. Herenton? The feisty Bowers has more than Bredesen on her plate. As she prepares to run against current Shelby County Commission chairman Michael Hooks for Dixon’s old state Senate seat, she confronts the reality of a political adversary serving as interim senator. This is former Teamster leader Sidney Chism, a longtime confidante of Mayor Herenton and a de facto Hooks ally, who got seven commission votes Monday — just enough to turn back two other aspirants, former Dixon aide Barry Myers and former state representative Alvin King.

“I’m not comfortable with Sidney in there,” Bowers confided Saturday after presiding over a special meeting of the Shelby County Democratic Committee in her role as local Democratic chairman. Bowers is one of several legislators who believe that Chism went out of his way to recruit primary opponents for them in the last election.

Chism, who has denied doing such recruitment, said Monday that some of the offended legislators had lobbied against him with Shelby County mayor A C Wharton. After the vote, Chism was given a formal welcome by state senator Jim Kyle, a close Bredesen ally and the current Senate minority leader.

The state Senate primary race has settled into a one-on-one affair, Hooks v. Bowers, after the withdrawal of state representative Joe Towns, who confronted unpaid fines for longstanding failures to file financial disclosure in previous races.

n Saturday’s special Democratic meeting had dealt with another thorny issue — the question of whether Shelby County Democrats would hold their biennial nominating convention in July this year, as Bowers and her supporters wished, or in April, along with the rest of the state’s Democratic county committees.

Bowers had requested the change, and the state Democratic committee had voted last month to permit it, so long as the local committee approved the request. The bottom line: Chairman Bowers’ contingent had the numbers, winning by voice vote.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

Bush v. the Bible

The biblical prophets frequently spoke to rulers and kings. They spoke to “the nations,” and it is the powerful that are most often the target audience. Those in charge of things are the ones called to greatest accountability. And the prophets usually spoke for the dispossessed, widows, and orphans, the hungry, the homeless, the helpless, the least, last, and lost. They spoke to a nation’s priorities.

Budgets are moral documents that reflect the values

and priorities of a family, church, organization, city, state,

or nation. They tell us what is most important and valued

to those making the budget. President Bush says that his

2006 budget “is a budget that sets priorities.”

Examining those priorities — who will benefit and

who will suffer in Bush’s budget — is a moral and religious

concern. Just as we have “environmental impact studies”

for public policies, it is time for a “poverty impact

statement,” which would ask the fundamental question of how

policy proposals affect low-income people. We could start

with this budget and do a “values audit” to determine how

its values square with those of the American people. I

believe this would reveal unacceptable priorities.

The cost of the deficit is increasingly borne by

the poor. The budget projects a record $427 billion

deficit and promises to make tax cuts benefiting the

wealthiest permanent. Religious communities have spoken

clearly in the past about the perils of a domestic policy

based primarily on tax cuts for the rich, program cuts for

low-income people, and an expectation of faith-based

charity. We must speak clearly now about a budget

lacking moral vision. A budget that scapegoats the poor and

fattens the rich, that asks for sacrifice from those who

can least afford it, is a moral outrage.

Low-income people should not be punished for

the government decisions that placed us in financial

straits. Rather than moving toward a “living family income,”

the budget stifles opportunities for low-income families,

which are vital for national economic security.

Our future is in serious jeopardy if one in three

proposed program cuts are to education initiatives (after

a highly touted “No Child Left Behind” effort), if there

will be less flexibility to include working-poor families

with children on Medicaid, and if reductions in community

and rural development, job training, food stamps, and

housing are accepted as solutions for reducing the deficit.

Cutting pro-work and pro-family supports for the

less fortunate jeopardizes the common good. (And this is

being done while defense spending rises again to $419 billion —

not including any additional spending for war in Iraq.)

These budget priorities would cause the prophets to

rise up in righteous indignation, as should we. Our nation

deserves better vision. Morally inspired voices must

provide vision for the people when none comes from its

leaders. We must believe that such vision can change the hearts

of those needing new grounding and direction.

The Bible talks often of the need to repent — to

turn and go in another direction. If we do not now “Write

the vision; make it plain upon tablets” (Habakkuk 2:2),

others cannot follow. If we do, we act to secure the future of

the common good.

The Rev. Jim Wallis, who visited Memphis this week

and was a speaker in the Lenten Series of Calvary Episcopal

Church, is author of the bestseller God’s Politics: Why the Right

Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn’t Get It. His essays

appear regularly on the Sojourners Web site, Sojo.net.

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

postscript

Certifiably Inane?

To the Editor:

Normally I enjoy reading your publication. However, after seeing the “Hotties” cover story (February 10th issue), I think you would be well advised to wait at least two months before casting stones at the perceived inanity of The Commercial Appeal.

Jeremy Scott

Memphis

What’s Shakin’

To the Editor:

I was delighted to see Janel Davis’ cover story about the earthquake threat in our region (February 3rd issue). The author did a wonderful job describing the history of the New Madrid fault, the efforts to monitor seismic activity, and the need for more stringent building codes.

However, the question of “What happens to Memphis when the inevitable happens?” was never really answered. To say that an earthquake of 8.0 or higher would cause “severe damage” or be “devastating” is an understatement. An event of this magnitude would be catastrophic! The author didn’t mention the impact such an event would have on fire-fighting, police, health-care, transportation facilities, or communications capability.

And little effort was made to make the reader aware that there are things we all can do to be better prepared for tragic natural events. The irony is that if we’re prepared for a natural disaster, it doesn’t take much more to be prepared for man-made disasters. We need more awareness, involvement, and preparedness.

Terry Coggins

Memphis

To the Editor:

A little more than a week after your earthquake story, we have one. Do you guys have a crystal ball or something?

Hal Miller

Memphis

Editor’s note: Not really. But we did cancel that bubonic plague story we had scheduled for this week.

The “F” Word

To the Editor:

Excuse me, Ms. DelBrocco, but do you think only conservatives yell trashy expletives at stop lights (Viewpoint, February 10th issue)? It happens in reverse also.

I was sitting at the light at Tillman and Sam Cooper in my big ole five-star crash-rated SUV with a little “W” sticker on the back. My daughters, age 5 years and 14 months, were in the backseat. It was a beautiful fall day, but luckily I did not have my windows down. A young man in one of those little vegan-powered hybrid things that looked like it would crumple in a head-on with my daughter’s bike pulled up on my right. His car was covered with Kerry/Edwards paraphernalia, with a few old Gore/Lieberman stickers thrown in for good measure. He was obviously agitated at my audacity to come into the Midtown area. The expletives he was hurling at me cannot be repeated, but rest assured there were more than a few “F” words being thrown around.

I could hear him through my closed windows, so I turned up the conservative country music to shield the little ears in the back. This lasted until I got my turn arrow and calmly left him ranting at my tailpipe, with a good view of the receding little “W” as I drove off.

Unlike DelBrocco, I was never really scared, because in keeping with certain “American traditions” — namely, the constitutionally provided right to bear arms — I am licensed to carry a weapon. If the man had ever really physically threatened me or my children … well, we won’t go there.

The point is that just about everyone had a stake in the last election, and emotions were running high on both sides of the aisle, not just for those nasty, old conservatives.

David Dean

Collierville

To the Editor:

Readers who might object to Cheri DelBrocco’s recent column about the real “F” word, i.e., fascism, might want to look up the study of fascist regimes made by Dr. Lawrence Britt. Britt found 14 distinguishing characteristics, among which are a fervor to show patriotic nationalism, a controlled mass media, regimes attaching themselves to the predominant religion of the country, and fraudulent elections.

A real conservative is fiscally responsible, a proponent of state and individual rights, and not inclined to engage in the excesses of empire.

The term “neocon,” which is used to describe our current administration’s political ideology, is nothing short of Orwellian for “fascist.” Given the deep divisions in our country today, if half the population continues to misunderstand the difference between “conservative” and “neocon,” our democracy may not survive.

John Pagoda

New York

Categories
Music Music Features

Tunnel Vision

If you’re looking for a local comparison for Retrospect, a young quartet that was the highest-finishing rock band at the 2003 Mid-South Grammy Showcase (finishing third overall), you might have problems. In some ways, the band splits the difference between the easy-on-the-ears college-rock of Ingram Hill and the glistening pop-rock of Crash Into June, except that Retrospect boasts a stronger guitar sound and surer beat than either. In a city where the rock scene sometimes seems like a four-point compass heading into directions heavy, rootsy, garage-y, or jammy, Retrospect might be the best bet for a straight-up rock breakout.

Though they certainly know their way around the alt-rock version of a power-ballad, the band’s at their best when rocking out a little. On their eponymous full-length debut (Ardent; Grade: B+), moody songs such as “One in a Million” and the overly emotive “Fall Like a Star” don’t hold up as well as more guitar-driven gems such as “Where Have You Been Hiding,” which has a faint roots-rock gallop, and especially the pure-pop gem “Forgetting Evelyn.” With its chiming guitars and circular chorus (“Morning brings a yellow light that turns to blue and then fades into night “), “Forgetting Evelyn” is so undeniably catchy that it can firmly implant itself in your hum matrix after only a couple of listens. The relatively modest vocals on these songs work well for singer Drew Thomas, who boasts an attractive, grainy yelp between emo and modern-rock, sort of like Bright Eyes’ Conor Oberst aiming for AOR.

On the strength of this debut full-length, which was not only recorded at Midtown’s venerable Ardent Studios (where it was produced by Ross Rice and John Hampton) but released on the studio’s own imprint, Retrospect sounds like the kind of band that could score on a rock-radio lottery ticket and actually deserve it. You can catch the band this week on Saturday, February 19th, at the Skatepark of Memphis. Showtime is 7 p.m.

Local label Inside Sounds chimes in with a couple of wildly different compilations of local artists. Goin’ Down South: Blues Sampler Vol. 2 (Inside Sounds; Grade: A-), a sequel to a highly successful collection the label issued in 2001, and this sprawling, diverse follow-up is proof that the well is far from dry when it comes to contemporary Memphis blues.

Robert Belfour’s acoustic hill-country lament “Old Black Mattie” was recorded by local musicologist David Evans in 1994 but sounds timeless in both sound and content (“I work seven days a week/Still can’t make ends meet”). “Country Days” by Blind Mississippi Morris & Brad Webb tells the quintessential blues tale of urban migration with a slinky, slide-guitar wallop. Daddy Mack Orr’s stomping, electric “Goin’ Back to Memphis” testifies to the best of the modern Beale sound. “Chicken and Gravy,” a sweet generations-spanning duet between hill-country legend Jessie Mae Hemphill and young inheritor Richard Johnston, uncovers the gentler, sadly unmarketable side of the blues rarely remarked upon now. Onetime Muddy Waters acolyte Willie Foster pays tribute to his mentor with a live version of “Hoochie Coochie Man” recorded live at a Cleveland, Mississippi, juke. Elsewhere, blue-eyed blues such as the blues-rock of the McCarty-Hite Project’s “So Many Roads, So Many Trains,” Sid Selvidge’s folky “Mama You Don’t Mean Me No Good,” and the pure soul of Phil Durham’s “Steal Away” attest to other strands of a traditional music with almost too many tributaries to count.

That doesn’t mean good things last forever. Don McMinn’s “Junior’s Place” pays tribute to the late icon Junior Kimbrough and his namesake club, but it’s the splendid trio of closing cuts on Goin’ Down South Vol. 2 that combine joy with loss most compellingly. The late Mose Vinson’s barrelhouse piano “Rock ‘n’ Roll Blues” nails an immensely pleasurable pre-war style few get right anymore, while the late Big Lucky Carter’s album-closing “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” is a patient hymn to a proud genre and culture that will likely never be as strong again. In between, Hemphill returns with “Lord, Help the Poor and Needy,” offering homemade percussion and one simple voice. Hemphill is still with us, of course, but in this context she sounds like a last link to a passing treasure.

Though it’s a pretty compelling listen the first time through, when you want to hear how the song/artist match-ups fare, Fried Glass Onions: Memphis Meets the Beatles (Inside Sounds; Grade: B) probably isn’t as durable a record as its straight-blues colleague. As the title implies, Fried Glass Onions is a collection of Beatles covers from a diverse array of local artists. What’s most interesting is that, instead of copying the Beatles style, most of the artists here make a conscious effort to infuse the songs with their own style and that of Memphis itself. The notion, as label chief Eddie Dattel explicates in the record’s interesting liner notes, is to bring out the latent Memphis influences in the Beatles music itself. The artists who do this most forcefully are perhaps the most interesting. There’s the Steve Cropper guitar that laces Bob Simon & Eddie Harrison’s take on Let It Be‘s “Two of Us,” the swampy blues treatment that Daddy Mack Orr gives to “Get Back,” the smooth Hi soul arrangement Bertram Brown works through on “You’re Gonna Lose That Girl,” and the Staple Singers bassline that the Memphis All-Stars add to “Drive My Car.” Other artists either play it straight or are more subtle in their Memphisms. Gospel singer Jackie Johnson takes Paul McCartney’s “Blackbird” to church a little, and listen for the wisps of organ and bass evoking Booker T. & the MGs near the end of John Kilzer’s “Across the Universe.”

E-mail: herrington@memphisflyer.com

Categories
News The Fly-By

Truth Is Everything

Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Godwin and federal public defender Pat Brown gave false information to U.S. District Judge Bernice Donald about Lynn Lang’s job status which influenced Donald to give Lang a lenient sentence.

Lang, the government’s star witness in the Logan Young Jr. trial, was sentenced February 7th to no jail time and fined $2,500. He faced a maximum of 135 years in prison on the charges on which he was indicted. Federal sentencing guidelines called for a sentence of 30 to 37 months.

Godwin and Brown told Donald that Lang is working as an assistant principal at Benton Harbor High School in Michigan. In fact, Lang resigned effective February 2nd, according to Superintendent Paula Dawning’s office. He submitted his resignation before that. It was the subject of an editorial in a Benton Harbor newspaper on January 30th — eight days before the sentencing.

Lang said nothing during or after the sentencing to correct the record, and both Godwin and Brown dodged reporters who attempted to ask them about it. Lang’s credibility and change of heart to “tell the truth about the things that made him look bad” were central to the government’s case against Young, who was convicted of paying $150,000 to Lang to get lineman Albert Means to enroll at the University of Alabama.

Brown and Godwin both encouraged Donald to impose a light sentence on Lang and made much of his job as an assistant principal in Benton Harbor, a largely black city on Lake Michigan near the Indiana border.

Asked by the Flyer last Friday if Lang had resigned, Brown said, “Why do you ask?” He then said, “Whatever I said in court last week is what I said.”

Godwin told the Flyer last Friday he was surprised to learn that Lang had resigned. He said he had an investigator check with school officials in Benton Harbor and was told that Lang actually resigned after the sentencing. By the most generous interpretation, that is technically true. Dawning’s office said the school board accepted Lang’s resignation February 8th. But a week earlier, the Benton Harbor Herald-Palladium chastised the board for getting “caught with egg all over its face” and apparently not knowing how to use the Internet and the Google search engine to find out about Lang’s troubles in Memphis.

“I had been told and certainly believed he was still employed,” said Godwin, adding that he was, however, aware that Lang’s status was uncertain because of his failure to report his indictment on his school application.

At the sentencing, a seemingly remorseful and sometimes choked-up Lang said he regretted his actions. A transcript of the hearing shows that Lang gave every indication that he was still working at Benton Harbor High School.

“The school that Mr. Godwin references, is it a high school or a middle school?” asked Judge Donald.

“High school,” said Lang. “I’ve always been at high school.”

“Do the people at this new school have a sports program?” Donald asked.

“Yes, ma’am,” said Lang. “The school, Benton Harbor High School, they have a football and basketball program.”

A moment later, Donald said, “But the fact that you are going to be working around young children at a school where you have been assigned as the assistant principal gives me some concern. That concern has been largely ameliorated by your statements and those of Mr. Godwin and Mr. Brown.”

Brown said Lang had obtained a master’s degree in Michigan and “has been employed as an assistant principal at Benton Harbor High School in Michigan.”

Godwin, who is from Michigan, said Benton Harbor “is not an easy place to be an assistant principal, it’s an East St. Louis kind of place, it’s a place that is a tough town … . And he’s there at that job right now.”

Godwin recommended a sentence “that would allow him to continue his employment” and said Lang understands that “the truth is everything.”

Donald, who was not the judge in the Young case, said, “I don’t know about his testimony, and I have intentionally refrained from reading any accounts about the trial because I knew the sentencing was coming up.”

Donald told the Flyer she could not comment on the case.

Categories
Music Music Features

sound advice

If you’ve been curious about all the new local soul and hip-hop acts you’ve heard or read about but haven’t been able to check out, Tonya Dyson-Jerry is determined to make it easy for you. Dyson-Jerry, whose Chiku Urban Marketing & Promotions was responsible for bringing confrontational hip-hop duo Dead Prez to the Complex last year for a great show, has helped assemble many of the scene’s best and brightest for Soul Aid: A Tsunami Relief Benefit, which will be held Sunday, February 20th, at Isaac Hayes Reloaded.

Dyson-Jerry’s own group, the duo Men-Nefer, will be on the bill, along with comrades Carmen and reigning Mid-South Grammy Showcase winners Will Graves & Soul. All three groups traffic in smooth neo-soul underscored by elements of gospel and/or jazz. For a different spin, there’s Tim Terry, whose blend of Prince, Marvin Gaye, and Tony Toni Toné on last year’s eponymous debut album proved the most convincing slice of contemporary local soul in years. For something else entirely, there’s the hip-hop collective Iron Mic Coalition, a collection of four groups that perform together and whose varied styles are united only by how out-of-step they are with the dominant Memphis rap sound. The IMC and group members Kontrast should both have debut albums on the horizon. Wrapping it all up is a new act, Nu Soul Project, which features Candice Ashir, onetime female vocal foil in Free Sol who has recently split from that group. You couldn’t ask for a more concise overview of this burgeoning scene than you’ll get Sunday at Isaac Hayes.

I didn’t spot Marc Broussard on the Grammy telecast Sunday night, but the New Orleans-based blue-eyed soul singer sure would have fit in. Judging from his album Carencro, Broussard is something of a cross between Joss Stone — the “old-soul’s voice in hot, young bod” who paid tribute to Janis Joplin at the awards — and such Grammy-approved radio soft-rock acts as John Mayer and Maroon 5. He sounds a little more like the former, whereas I’d prefer the latter. (Okay, I don’t like Mayer’s music, but he sure seems like a smart, witty guy when he isn’t singing.) There’s no denying that there’s a considerable talent at work here. Don’t be surprised if you see Broussard on the big stage someday, belting out classics in tribute to some aging or deceased soul star who’s getting a Lifetime Achievement Award. Broussard will be at Newby’s Thursday, February 17th, with David Ryan Harris.

Chris Herrington

A sad but true confession: I have a panic attack anytime someone says, “You really need to listen to [insert name of contemporary blues artist I’ve never heard of here].” As anyone who has ever sat through a preliminary round of the International Blues Challenge can attest, it’s impossible to imagine that many of today’s artists have ever heard the blues, let alone lived it. It is therefore with great surprise and absolute joy that I recommend Precious Bryant, a 60-year-old should-be blues diva who’s playing Proud Larry’s in Oxford on Friday, February 18th. Bryant, whose record Fool Me Good was produced by the North Mississippi All Stars’ road manager Amos Harvey, doesn’t have a terribly powerful voice. But her dry delivery is the perfect complement to her one-chord boogies and East Texas-meets-Piedmont rambles. Elements of Basin Street jazz creep in when Bryant covers the Peggy Lee classic “Fever,” but, generally speaking, Fool Me Good sounds like a blues record produced in a vacuum, influenced by Lightnin’ Hopkins, perhaps, and nobody else.

And now it’s time for another curmudgeonly, nearly begrudging recommendation. The appeal of John Eddie — the man who would be Springsteen — escapes me almost entirely. Oh sure, he may have been a hit at the Stone Pony, the Boss may have jumped up on stage to play with him, and Jim (“do no wrong”) Dickinson may have shown some interest in him, but I remain largely unimpressed. It will be a cold, cold day before I get excited about a songwriter whose best commentary on aging is “turning 40 f*&king sucks.” True enough perhaps, but too pedestrian to even be boilerplate. I’ll have to admit a soft spot for a song called “Low Life,” a hard-driving tune about a fellow who takes strippers to breakfast and spends all his rent money on a KISS tattoo. Also, “Play Some Skynyrd” is a song whose appeal may escape the general masses, but for anybody who’s ever picked up a guitar and done their best to entertain ungrateful drunks in a shithole bar in Nowheresville, U.S.A., it’s positively endearing. Eddie will be joined by The Blair Combest Band at the Hi-Tone Café Wednesday, February 23rd.

Categories
Opinion

Family Fun

It’s fun! It’s educational! It’s Parker Brothers’ new mystery game, “O.C. SMitH, MeDiCAl EXaMIner.” Winners get a sample of barbed wire and a subpoena.

A skilled mystery writer would have this story end with A) Smith’s conviction, B) Smith’s acquittal, or C) nothing: the plot is too far-fetched.

The initials JMJ stand for A) Jesus, Mary and Joseph, B) Jolly Michael Jackson, or C) CWC upside down.

Smith’s attacker was A) a 25-ish fleshy man weighing about 170 pounds, B) a 40-ish man weighing about 200 pounds, or C) Colonel Mustard in the library with a lead pipe.

In the fight for his life in the stairwell, Smith was A) tougher than a combat-experienced Navy Seal, B) easier to subdue than your great-aunt Eunice, or C) throwing desperate haymakers at himself.

The overwrought piety and self-important tone of the mysterious letters suggest the author was A) a Catholic anti-abortion zealot, B) a fundamentalist death-penalty zealot, or C) Andy Wise or Wendi Thomas.

The misspellings and curious use of capital letters suggest the author is A) deranged, B) an e-mail spammer, or C) a Memphis high school graduate.

The pictures of Smith post-attack look like A) a commercial for Clearasil, B) a man splashed with lye, or C) a typical 1963 high school graduation picture.

The large number of female witnesses in the trial shows A) forensics is an equal opportunity field, B) women really can do math and science, or C) Smith was getting more than Frank Sinatra in his prime.

The phrase “rendered safe” means that A) a bomb has been fixed so it won’t blow up, B) your teenaged daughter is home with the flu, or C) Willie Herenton has had a vasectomy.

The barbed-wire headgear worn by Smith resembles A) Hannibal Lecter’s mask, B) a crown of thorns, or C) a birthday present for John Ford.

The scars on O. C. Smith’s chest came from A) machine gun fire, B) a knife attack in hand-to-hand combat, or C) a breast reduction.

The involvement of the Mike Fleming radio program in the case is evidence of A) the importance of talk radio, B) a red herring, or C) great news for Mike Fleming.

Two weeks after the attack, Smith and a female French anthropologist went to Lyons, France, to A) study 19th-century manuscripts, B) unwind and craft an alibi, or C) drink wine and make whoopee.

The phrase “frog-march” describes A) Smith’s attacker forcing him to the stairwell, B) Navy Seal hazing, or C) a drum-and-bugle team in Lyons.

Smith’s description of his attacker is what you would expect from A) a veteran forensic pathologist with keen powers of observation, B) a man punched and doused with lye, or C) a cross-eyed drunk with an Etch-A-Sketch.

Smith rappelled down a bridge to get to a dead body because he was A) showboating, B) didn’t want to get his pants wet, or C) wanted to try out his new rope.

The cost of protecting Smith and his wife 24/7 for months with TACT officers was A) $1 million, B) $10 million, or C) a big waste of money.

A barbed-wire bit like the one on Smith would look good on A) a terrorist, B) a cranky horse, or C) some members of the Memphis City Council.

The presence of Super Glue on the back of the bomb on Smith’s chest indicates A) the attacker was serious, B) the stuff doesn’t work well, or C) product placement.

“Push it, pull it, twist it” is A) a way to trigger a motion-sensitive bomb, B) a child’s toy, or C) a male impotence remedy.

“Factitious victimization” is A) a mental disorder, B) psychobabble, or C) a great way for an expert witness to make a few thousand bucks.

Smith’s conviction will show that A) justice is blind, B) the “attacker” theory was ridiculous, or C) a jury will believe anything.

Smith’s acquittal will show that A) our judicial system works, B) the “he did it himself” theory was ridiculous, or C) a jury will believe anything.