Categories
News The Fly-By

Q&A: Dean Deyo

With the largest ballot Shelby County has ever seen arriving in voting booths this August, the Coalition for a Better Memphis wanted to help local citizens choose highly qualified candidates. The coalition devised a ranking system for candidates and released its first set of results — evaluating those running for County Commission seats — just a few weeks ago. The results have caused perhaps an expected stir among candidates: The winners think the system works; the losers see it as flawed. The Flyer recently spoke with Dean Deyo, one of the coalition’s organizers and the chairman of the Leadership Academy. — By Ben Popper

Flyer: How did you get the idea?

Deyo: We would have to give credit to the Regional Chamber [of Commerce] in Memphis. They do something called Best Practices, where they travel to other cities and try to exchange ideas and steal whatever they do best. They looked at what they were doing in Atlanta and said this would be fabulous for us.

How were the criteria for the rankings developed?

In order to expedite the process we hired the same consultant who was hired by Atlanta, a group called Civic Strategies. They came to Memphis, interviewed our community leaders, and read everything they could in the archives of The Commercial Appeal and the Memphis Flyer. They went and pulled copies of the Shelby County five-year plan. From that research, they developed a list of qualities a County Commission candidate should have and the issues they should know about.

We have also created a “transparent” system. You as a voter may appreciate what we’re doing but feel that at the end of the day the only issue that matters to you is ethics. That is why we posted the candidates’ individual scores on the Web site, as well as their written responses to each question.

Who is in the coalition?

We knew from the beginning that we needed a diverse coalition. If you look at the enrollment online you will see we have everything from AutoZone to neighborhood associations like the 35th Ward Civic Club to 100 Black Men, the Urban League, and Memphis Tomorrow. So we had over 110 people with nothing in common, white and black, young and old, Democrat and Republican.

Politicians have always been elected on rhetoric. What’s wrong with that?

One example I used at our first meeting that seemed to ring true to people is the District 29 election: Ophelia Ford and Terry Roland. Ford won by 13 votes. Because it came off-cycle, we didn’t know much about either of them. But perhaps a more important point is that there was a third candidate in that election: Robert Hodges, better known as Prince Mongo. He got 89 votes. Now there might have been some people who voted for him because his name appears on nearly every ballot, and they assumed he was a credible candidate. If information had been out there, maybe this election could have been different from the beginning.

Categories
News The Fly-By

Let’s Talk About Sex

“We’ll start out with an exercise I call tongue Pilates. Girl, please just let me massage your body,” says Lenny Cane, a handsome man whose kinky braids resemble a jheri curl. While it would be nice, he’s not speaking directly to me. Cane is the emcee of Risqué, an evening of “tastefully erotic poetry” at the Complex on Madison Avenue.

He’s warming up the crowd of about 100 young African-American men and women. With each rhyme Cane makes, the women squeal with laughter.

The event, organized by Memphian James Davis from Memphis Live! Entertainment, took place last Friday and featured five local poets performing rehearsed pieces dealing with sex and love. Poets auditioned earlier in the month.

Cane introduces a man named Mike, a dapper fellow with close-cropped hair and a pinstripe suit. He performs a piece called “Three’s.”

“I’ll show you how a real man removes a thong/My lips/My teeth/My hurricane tongue,” says Mike during his performance. Somehow he manages to make “thong” rhyme with “tongue.” As he does, the women scream.

Next on the stage is a woman named Ms. White. Her poem consists mostly of one line: “I love every inch of him that makes him a man.” I’m bored.

The next performer is a man simply known as Mister. Also dressed in a suit, he’s carrying a champagne flute of red wine. His poem is hilarious, especially when he says, “I got about $5/Put it in my tank/We go around the corner/Watch a matinee,” in a comedic tribute to ghetto dating.

Although the event is billed as “tastefully erotic,” my friend leans over and says, “These people are way too conservative. I won’t be happy until I hear the word ‘labia.'”

Hmmm, maybe-a, baby-a … there are possibilities here, but it appears my friend is not going to be happy. The next performers take the stage. Michelle Montgomery recites a poem that’s more about passion than sex while a man called “Fat Dude” sings low in the background.

The last performer is an award-winning local poet named Bon-Ton. Unlike the other performers, however, he doesn’t rhyme about getting down and dirty with the opposite sex. Instead, his poem is about his love for another man (“I caressed her/ But I thought about him,” he says).

After the poets finish the first round, a man from Black AIDS Memphis throws condoms on the stage and gives a lecture about safe sex. Women from the audience slowly sneak to the stage and grab handfuls.

It looks like everyone was listening.

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

Exposed

A few years ago, Bill Simmons of ESPN.com wrote a classic column about the “levels of losing,” a kind of Dante’s Inferno of memorable ways for sports teams to lose.

In getting swept out of the playoffs by the Dallas Mavericks, the Memphis Grizzlies experienced nearly every one of those levels.

In fact, the team’s epic overtime loss to the Mavs in game three last Saturday might qualify for half of Simmons’ 12 types of memorable defeats, including the two lowest levels: “The Stomach Punch,” which “ends with an opponent making a pivotal (sometimes improbable) play” (Dirk Nowitzki’s game-tying three-pointer off a loose ball), and “The Guillotine,” where “your team’s hanging tough but you can feel the inevitable breakdown coming.”

Monday night’s game four, by contrast, was clearly a “Full-Fledged Butt-Kicking,” and the whole series can be labeled as an “Alpha Dog,” where “a superior player made the difference … unfortunately, he wasn’t playing for your team.”

Grizzlies coach Mike Fratello’s post-game press conference after Monday’s season-ending loss was actually a lighter affair than the increasingly morose pre- and post-game appearances he’d made previously, as if he were relieved to have the nightmare end. At one point, he was asked to pinpoint what went wrong and said, “I think it exposes … ” but then he trailed off, declining to get into specifics. So allow me to finish the thought, because the Grizzlies’ dismal playoff showing exposed plenty, especially about the team’s key on- and off-court figures.

Jerry West: West’s off-season trades and signings may have added solid-citizen veterans to clean up a poisoned locker room, but his moves also left this team without the requisite perimeter athleticism to compete in the post-season, primarily the ability to penetrate defenses on one end of the court and deny them on the other. In this series, the Grizzlies’ slow perimeter players were completely outclassed by the Mavs’ speedier and more explosive scorers. And this is to say nothing of West’s perennial inaction when it comes to the Grizzlies’ widely acknowledged weakness on the boards.

Mike Fratello: For the second straight year, Fratello’s post-season performance didn’t inspire much confidence. The coach never seemed to settle on a game plan against the Mavericks, searching fruitlessly throughout the series for workable match-ups. With Bonzi Wells, the player Fratello banned from the building last post-season, starring in Sacramento and whispers around the Forum about players and front-office personnel having grown weary of his coaching style, Fratello’s future in Memphis has to be in question.

Pau Gasol: After making a definite leap in the regular season, Gasol’s series against Dallas was distressingly similar to his previous performances against Phoenix and San Antonio, performing very well for stretches but struggling — or disappearing — just as often. Gasol’s post-season made it crystal clear that he’s not the kind of top-tier superstar who can put a mediocre supporting cast on his back and win in the playoffs. Despite the agonizing over Gasol you’ll hear on talk radio, the franchise’s first All-Star isn’t this team’s problem and may yet be part of the solution. But, at this point, trading Gasol is an option that should be on the table this off-season. And if he stays, the team has to build with him, not around him.

Mike Miller: No one on this team got exposed in the post-season as much as Miller, who headed into the Dallas series with dismal career playoff averages of 9.1 points per game on 40 percent shooting through 16 games and performed almost exactly as poorly (8.5 points/40 percent shooting) in this series. Miller’s Houdini act in the crucial game three — going scoreless in regulation on the night he received the league’s Sixth Man of the Year award — was a painful confirmation of his inability to perform under pressure. Coming off a fine regular season, it’s time for the Grizzlies to sell high on Miller to a team that hasn’t noticed his post-season shortcomings.

Categories
Opinion

The Week in Review

For the first time in years, no Memphis or Shelby County school can claim bragging rights for being on Newsweek’s list of America’s 1,000 best high schools.

Tennessee has eight schools on the list, including two Nashville schools in the top 50 (Martin Luther King and Hume Fogg). Little Rock also has two schools in the top 50 (Central and Mills University Studies). Neither of the Nashville schools that cracked the top 50 was in the top 1,000 in the previous survey. Meanwhile, White Station High School in Memphis came off the honor roll after making it in two previous years. So did the schools change that much since the 2004 survey? Maybe. Maybe not.

“I rank to get attention,” survey designer Jay Mathews says in the FAQ. Newsweek’s list, first published in 1998 and four times since then, includes only public high schools. Mathews, the Washington Post‘s education reporter, says too many private schools won’t provide data. The list also excludes “public elites” whose students have an average ACT score of 27 or above or an average SAT of 1,300 or above.

The article says the top 1,000 includes “schools that do the best job of preparing average students for college.” Several schools on the list have a significant percentage of students who receive free or reduced-price lunches, including Science and Engineering Magnet School in Dallas, which ranked eighth and has 48 percent of its students on subsidized lunch. The survey puts a lot of weight on Advanced Placement courses and tests and how many students take them. Mathews says that sending a student to college without taking AP or similar courses is “dumb” and “a form of educational malpractice.”

Other Tennessee high schools on the list include Fairview, Franklin, Brentwood, Oak Ridge, Hillsboro, and Centennial (Franklin).

Bottom line: School ratings by Newsweek and U.S. News matter because they matter. Our superintendents should make sure they don’t get blanked next time.

• The Memphis Board of Education this week approved funding for a new sports complex at Central High School to replace Crump Stadium. But the 72-year-old concrete monolith whose heyday was more than 40 years ago may not be demolished anytime soon.

A historic preservation issue must be dealt with first, said Joe Garrison, review and compliance coordinator for the Tennessee Historical Commission (THC) in Nashville.

Crump Stadium is on the National Register of Historic Places. Unless additional engineering studies determine that it is structurally unsound and cannot be shored up, then it stays on the register. “If it’s eligible, then it’s hard to justify use of federal funds to demolish it,” Garrison said. THC is working with the Memphis Landmarks Commission. Landmarks manager Nancy Jane Baker could not be reached for comment.

The city of Memphis Office of Housing and Community Development, the school board, and Central High School officials support the demolition and new sportsplex, which is part of a $21 million renovation of Central High. Superintendent Carol Johnson told the school board that delaying capital projects makes them more expensive.

Garrison, however, said Memphis must show two things: a need for a sportsplex and a compelling reason for putting it at the Crump Stadium site and not somewhere else. “Memphis has a lot of open spaces,” he said.

Garrison is optimistic that “we’re going to get through this” in amicable fashion. But a confrontation may be inevitable. The issue is not whether Crump Stadium is stable but whether it is useful and worth keeping. Most Memphis decision-makers have said no.

• The plagiarism police at The New York Times are out for blood. A Harvard student’s chick-lit book is the latest offender. In a story, “Second Ripple in Plagiarism Scandal,” the following similarities to another book are noted: A “full-fledged debate over animal rights” is “a full-scale argument about animal rights.” A character in one book says, “The mink like being made into coats.” In the other book, “The foxes want to be made into scarves.” A heartthrob in both books has “eyes so dark they’re almost black.”

That’s not plagiarism; it’s imitation and trite writing. There isn’t a print journalist in America who could survive such scrutiny.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

We’ve Got Mail

One of the axiomatic political races of our time was the
Republican primary race for the open 7th District congressional seat
in 2002. The race featured one well-known Nashville-area candidate, then state
senator Marsha Blackburn of Brentwood, against three – count ’em, 3 –
entries from Shelby County: city councilman Brent Taylor, state senator
Mark Norris, and attorney David Kustoff (now U.S. Attorney for
Tennessee’s Western District).

Each of the three local candidates convinced themselves at
the time that there were enough Shelby County votes to go around, that – as one
of them argued – even if the county’s Republican votes were evenly split three
ways, the leading local candidate would still poll more than Blackburn in the
winner-take-all.

On the basis of this rather serious misunderstanding (it
failed to reckon with Blackburn’s campaigning skill or her statewide reputation
as an income-tax foe), Messrs. Taylor and Norris launched nonstop personal
attacks on each other and on Kustoff, who belatedly, in the last week of the
primary campaign, joined in the mudfest.

At the end of it all, Blackburn, who refrained from any
direct attacks on her opponents, won an absolute majority of the votes,
district-wide, and even finished second, behind Kustoff, in Shelby County, For
better or for worse (that depends on one’s politics, of course), the
conservative Blackburn is a power to be reckoned with in Washington today.

Moral of the story? Muddy hands make for meager votes, at
least in a multi-candidate race where one of the candidates stays free and clear
of the melee.

There is no exact analogy between that campaign and what’s
going on in the GOP primary for the U.S. Senate. But of the three candidates,
two of them – former congressman Ed Bryant, who had vacated that 7th
District seat in 2002 for his first turn at the Senate and former 4th
District congressman Van Hilleary, an unsuccessful gubernatorial
candidate in 2002 – are engaging more or less constantly in personal attacks,
against each other and against the third Republican, former Chattanooga mayor
Bob Corker
.

Corker, for his part, is concentrating his fire on
unopposed Democrat Harold Ford Jr.

Most of this warfare, in keeping with the times, is via the
Internet, circulated to media outlets and on various of the email networks which
are virtually teeming in political circles these days. They concentrate on this
or that – ‘my polls are better than their polls,’ ‘I’m the real
conservative; the others are fakers,’ and the like – but of all these
attacks, by far the most remarkable, certainly the most tedious, and maybe the
most counter-productive, come from the Bryant campaign.

These are the email reminders sent out daily under the head
“Bob Corker Fraud Watch, Day ___.” As of Monday, the fill-in-the-blank series
had got up to Day 76, and, as always, the email referenced six former
Chattanooga city employees who in the last year or so have been accused of
various misdeeds, petty and otherwise, and broadly implied, without exactly
saying so or offering any evidence, that Corker might have been looking the
other way.

The accusation seems to derive from charges of alleged past
accounting irregularities made by Corker’s successor as Chattanooga mayor,
Ron Littlefield
, who was taken to task back in March by the Chattanooga
Times-Free Press
in an editorial deploring “the
more negative trend and tone of events in city government” under Littlefield.

Whatever the facts of the matter, or of the relationship
to them, direct or indirect, of Corker (who has dismissed the allegations and
done his best to ignore them), one fact is undeniable:

Bryant’s “Bob Corker Fraud Watch” emails have varied
only slightly, if at all, from Day One to Day 76. In fact, they seem to be
identical, word for word, day after day after day.

Always subheaded: “…
What did Bob Corker know?  When did he know it? 

What did he do about it?”
 

The same email, 76 days in a row and counting.

 

Lawdy.

Ironically, the mild-mannered
Bryant on the stump comes off almost as vanilla-flavored as Corker  — or, for
that matter, Democrat Ford, who no doubt hopes, a la Blackburn in 2002, to be
the beneficiary later on of the ongoing mayhem in Republican ranks. The nearest
thing to a flame-thrower in the Senate race is Hilleary, though even his stump
rhetoric has been just a cut above the intensity of two sticks being rubbed
together by a determined Boy Scout.

But oh, them emails!

Art Imitates
Life-and-Death
: Difficult as it is to be in two different places at the same
time, Tennessee governor Phil Bredesen managed to pull off just such a
trick last Thursday night.

Naifeh and Bredesen at Coon Supper

One place where the governor
could be seen, was the Covington Country Club, site of the annual “Coon Supper”
hosted by Jimmy Naifeh, Speaker of the state House of Representatives.
The well-attended event (which serves up a wide variety of hors d-oeuvres and
conventional grilled meats, as well as the featured item) is held toward the end
of each year’s legislative session and, especially during election years, draws
a large crowd of politicians and their attendants, both statewide and local.

(An apparent non-attendee this
year was Rep. Ford, who was criticized in some circles for being at last year’s
event rather than in Washington for a close vote on President Bush‘s
budget.)

The second and simultaneous place for a Bredesen sighting
was at Rhodes College, where a spirited troupe of actors – the
“Rock-‘n-Rollers,” they call themselves – put on another in a series of annual
(sometimes twice annual) dramatic productions.

All of these players are
affiliated with the Center for Independent Living, a non-profit agency which, in
its online self-description, “[p]rovides resource information, personal
and technical support, independent living skills training, peer support and
advocacy to persons with disabilities who want to improve the quality of their
lives. Serves people with all types of disabilities.”     

‘Barker’ and ‘Bredesen’ at Rhodes

The “Rock-‘n-Rollers” are indeed
“people with all types of disabilities,” some of them severe, ranging from
post-traumatic to congenital, but they still summon up an astonishing degree of
versatility, skill, and – not least – passion on stage, in the productions that
are written and directed by the troupe’s talented advisor, Mary Claire Giffin.

Two disclosures are in order:
First, my Flyer colleagues Chris amd Charlotte Davis were the original dramatists
and directors for the first several of these productions, roughly a decade ago.
Second, and more to the immediate point, my oldest son, Marcus Baker, is a
“Rock-‘n-Roller,” who this year played TV host Bob Barker in a production
entitled Survivor Memphis: Mud Island.
           

The play focused on the
difficulties faced by already challenged persons — including several of the
cast members — who were among those purged from the TennCare rolls last year
and now must find other ways of coping with their often prodigious medical and
financial needs.

The plot — based, of course, on
the current TV series Survivor – posited a situation whereby Governor
Bredesen finds himself among a group of disabled “contestants” trying literally
to survive. The play takes several genuinely comic turns, after one of which the
governor finds himself suddenly afflicted with a “fourth world” disease, one
requiring medication available only through TennCare.

Many of the lines, spoken with
gusto by cast members, possess satirical bite and are not at all flattering
toward the governor nor his policy of TennCare cuts.  The key statement comes
from a cured and repentant  “Bredesen,” who, toward the end, comments, “I guess
I never really thought about it because it never affected me. I did not realize
what it would be like, to, well, know you were going to die because you are not
able to get your medical needs taken care of like you once could.”

Pretty nitty gritty. The fact
is, however, that the TennCare cuts, eliminating many uninsurables, are still in
effect. It should be said that the governor has proposed a revised state
insurance plan, Cover Tennessee, that he suggests would re-incorporate many of
the currently uninsurable under as a high-risk pool plan.

Meanwhile, we can be sure that
the Rock-‘n-Rollers will be there to keep the issue center stage.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

Speaking Truth

An astonishing dialogue took place last weekend during a North Memphis forum featuring candidates for the 9th District congressional seat. The forum, third in a series organized by the Rev. LaSimba Gray, was undertaken (like the first two) in a self-professed effort to select a “consensus” black candidate — on the ground that only one such could represent the district’s African-American majority.

Rev. Gray’s effort was patently aimed at the candidacy of state

senator Steve Cohen — one of several hopefuls in a rather talented field who could do the 9th District proud. Cohen, however, happens to be white — though he has been a consistent champion of civil rights (and of black candidates for office) over the years.

Having failed to get the senator’s goat by applying overtly racial criteria to the series of debates, Gray must have thought he’d hit the mother lode when, in responding to a forum question two weeks ago about the readiness of candidates to take an FBI background test and a drug test, Cohen answered perfunctorily in the affirmative and then pointed out that, in our democracy, it is the FBI — the same FBI that once plotted against Dr. Martin Luther King — that should pass our, the citizens’, test.

The same question was asked a second time in last weekend’s debate, and this time the good reverend accompanied it with a bogus set of facts about congressional high crimes and misdemeanors, using an Internet fable that was demonstrated to be a fiction way back in 1999.

Cohen is Cohen, and he speaks what he thinks. Answering the original question much as he had the first time, he then told Gray that “with all respect,” the statistics he’d given out weren’t genuine. That gave Gray the opportunity to step out of his moderator’s role and call Cohen “paternalistic and arrogant,” accusing him of insulting the predominantly black audience.

Mission accomplished, Gray must have thought, a la G.W. Bush.

Cohen and several of the other candidates have vowed to speak truth to power. Given the fact that Gray possesses at least a modicum of power in ministerial affairs and in the African-American community, we regret that other candidates did not follow Cohen’s lead and contradict “information” that must have seemed patently spurious to many of them as well. In fairness, the program had, by that time, almost run its course, and not many of them had the opportunity to object.

Whoever goes to Congress from the 9th District must represent all of the residents of District 9 — black or white, Republican, Democrat, or independent — and the best way to get started on such a noble mission is to acknowledge that all of the residents of District 9 are eligible to serve as well as to be served.

Under the circumstances, it would be speaking truth to power to say so out loud. At the very least, what a self-respecting candidate should do when he hears outright balderdash is to speak simple truth.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

An Affront to Jews

Charley Reese’s Viewpoint in the Memphis Flyer (April 20th issue) is an affront not only to American Jews but to all Americans of good faith and most especially those of us who love and believe in democracy.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran has made it eminently clear that his goal in developing a nuclear arsenal is to annihilate the state of Israel. When dictators speak, it is wise to listen. Had the world taken Mein Kampf more seriously and not written it off as the benign musings of a little Austrian house painter, perhaps the millions of casualties of World War II might have met a different fate. Moreover, when anyone, be he a despot or a local skinhead, advocates the annihilation of the state of Israel, he is ipso facto attacking all Jews and Judaism itself. The Jewish state came into being not just to establish a new political entity but to create a haven for Jews. At no time since the Holocaust have there been more calls for the genocide of the Jews. To threaten the existence of the state is to question the right of Jews to exist at all.

The use of the word “roach” by Reese, i.e. cockroach, is particularly horrendous, having been used not long ago in Rwanda to incite the slaughter of the Tutsis there. In March 1993, an article appeared in an extremist Hutu newspaper titled “The Cockroach Cannot Give Birth to a Butterfly.” By dehumanizing the enemy and suggesting that future generations will be no better, the article rallied the forces of hatred just as the Nazis did in Der Sturmer. The implication that now Israel is the roach in the American salad carries heinous undertones.

The American alliance with the state of Israel is based on kindred political beliefs, primarily in democracy and the sanctity of human life. The “roach” in the salad, if that terminology is to be utilized at all, is the radical dictator who leads citizens into poverty, unwanted wars, and misery.

There is no historical evidence to the claim that populations support their dictators when those despots come under attack. Quite the opposite is true. The tributes to Lenin and Stalin could not crumble fast enough in the former Soviet Union. When Idi Amin came under attack in Uganda in 1979, his people forced him into exile and subsequently labeled him a war criminal. Democracies do not go to war against other democracies because their elected leaders are driven by the will of the people. And dictatorships lose wars when they fight democracies because their people are not fighting to save a way of life that they have chosen and cherish.

Reese’s view of the Middle East is so distorted that it would be futile to undertake a rational and comprehensive response. However, where his language and claims are most insidious lie in his accusations regarding a so-called Israeli lobby. In truth, people of all faiths in this country who support Israel do so for its strategic value, its friendship with the United States and the free world, and a host of other reasons. No country on earth has willingly relinquished territory for the sake of peace when there is no partner with whom to negotiate, and yet Prime Minister Ariel Sharon did just that when he withdrew Israeli troops and citizens from Gaza in the summer of 2005. Americans of all religious pursuits recognize such efforts for the sake of peace and applaud them.

Finally, in recalling the anti-Semitic slur of the French ambassador to London, M. Bernard, who labeled Israel “a (expletive deleted) little country,” Reese exposes himself as a man of questionable values and an obvious lack of good judgment. That same French diplomat was chastised by his government for his indiscretion. Recently, under the guise of criticism of Israeli politics, anti-Semites have comfortably spewed Jew hatred publicly in the media with no misgivings. Since the end of World War II and the Gentleman’s Agreement era, never have anti-Semites been so comfortable taking their egregious slander out of the back rooms and bringing it into the heart of “genteel company.”

Perhaps in a democratic society (unlike those with whom Reese would have us align ourselves), the press must engage the likes of a Charley Reese to express his opinion. However, it is appalling that the Memphis Flyer would carry such a column without a disclaimer advising its readership that the editorial staff does not agree, nay, that it unequivocally abhors, the hateful venom espoused therein.

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

Parsing Jerry West

Grizzlies president of basketball operations met the media today for a post-mortem on the team’s season. West had plenty of interesting things to say, but most notable by far was the way he hung current head coach Mike Fratello out to dry.

Asked about the upside of little-used (by Fratello) rookies Hakim Warrick and Lawrence Roberts, whom West selected in last summer’s draft, The Logo said, “I think Hakim Warrick could be a great player if he played. Maybe I’m wrong. I didn’t coach him. I think Lawrence Roberts would rebound the ball, if he played.” Ouch!

Later, West was asked about former Grizzly Bonzi Wells, who is playing brilliantly for the Sacramento Kings in the playoffs but whom Fratello dismissed from the Grizzlies during last year’s playoffs. The question was, “Why couldn’t [Wells] play for this team?” West’s pointed response: “I’m not the one to answer that.”

For more on what West said today and what it might mean, see our Grizzlies blog here.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Q&A: Dean Deyo, co-convener, Coalition for a Better Memphis

With the
largest ballot Shelby County
has ever seen arriving in voting booths this August, the Coalition for a Better
Memphis wanted to help local citizens choose highly qualified candidates. The
coalition devised a ranking system for candidates and released its first set of
results — evaluating those running for County Commission
seats — just a few weeks ago. The results have caused perhaps an expected stir
among candidates: The winners think the system works; the losers see it as
flawed. The Flyer
recently spoke with Dean Deyo, one of the coalition’s organizers and the
chairman of the Leadership Academy.
By Ben
Popper

Flyer: How did you
get the idea?

Deyo: We
would have to give credit to the Regional Chamber [of Commerce] in Memphis. They
do something called Best Practices, where they travel to other cities and try to
exchange ideas and steal whatever they do best. They looked at what they were
doing in Atlanta and said this would be fabulous for us.

How were the
criteria for the rankings developed?

In order to expedite the process we
hired the same consultant who was hired by Atlanta, a group called Civic
Strategies. They came to Memphis, interviewed our community leaders, and read
everything they could in the archives of
The Commercial Appeal

and the
Memphis Flyer
.
They went and pulled copies of the Shelby County five-year plan. From that
research, they developed a list of qualities a County Commission candidate
should have and the issues they should know about.

We have also created a “transparent” system. You as
a voter may appreciate what we’re doing but feel that at the end of the day the
only issue that matters to you is ethics. That is why we posted the candidates’
individual scores on the Web site, as well as their written responses to each
question.

Who is in the
coalition?

We knew from the beginning that we needed a
diverse coalition. If you look at the enrollment online you will see we have
everything from AutoZone to neighborhood associations like the 35th Ward Civic
Club to 100 Black Men, the Urban League, and Memphis Tomorrow. So we had over
110 people with nothing in common, white and black, young and old, Democrat and
Republican.

Politicians have
always been elected on rhetoric. What’s wrong with that?

One example I used at our first meeting that
seemed to ring true to people is the District 29 election: Ophelia Ford and
Terry Roland. Ford won by 13 votes. Because it came off-cycle, we didn’t know
much about either of them. But perhaps a more important point is that there was
a third candidate in that election: Robert Hodges, better known as Prince Mongo.
He got 89 votes. Now there might have been some people who voted for him because
his name appears on nearly every ballot, and they assumed he was a credible
candidate. If information had been out there, maybe this election could have
been different from the beginning.

Categories
News

It’s Hard Out Here for a Pimpfant

If there’s any further evidence needed that Three 6 Mafia is well on its way to world domination, here it is: Pimp clothes for kids. Yep, “baby-beater” tank tops, “Jr. Pimp Squad” jerseys, and “My Mom is a MILF” T-shirts. Just the thing to get your little ones into thug culture at the earliest possible age. Next up: Baby Grills. Yo, check it here.