Categories
News

Memphis in May to Keep Riverside Drive Open Longer

Memphis in May will keep Riverside Drive open longer as it prepares for the annual month-long Festival. Work on the Festival in Tom Lee Park began today, but Memphis in May officials plan to work in and around Tom Lee Park and keep Riverside Drive open to traffic as much as possible.

Jim Holt, President & CEO of Memphis in May said, “Keeping Riverside Drive open while work is underway in Tom Lee Park will benefit those who rely on this major thoroughfare to access their homes and their jobs. While our work schedule is critical to the success of the month-long Festival, being a good neighbor and keeping the inconvenience of the Festival to a minimum is a real responsibility of the Festival.”

During the Festival’s stay in Tom Lee Park, traffic on Riverside Drive will be diverted to two-way traffic with access to one lane northbound and one lane southbound beginning Saturday, April 28. The street will close completely beginning at 12:01 a.m on Thursday, May 3rd in preparation for the Beale Street Music Festival, May 4-6. The street will close from Georgia St. to Union Avenue. The street will re-open on Tuesday, May 8th at 12:01 a.m.

Riverside Drive will close again for the World Championship Barbecue Cooking Contest on Wednesday, May 16th at 12:01 A.M. through Monday, May 21st at 12:01am, and again for Memphis in May’s finale, the Regions Sunset Symphony, at 12:01a.m. on Friday, May 25th and reopen at 12:01a.m. on Monday, May 28th.

Categories
News

Hot Panda Sex … Or Not

Once the San Diego Zoo traded its distant, brooding male panda Shi Shi for panda playboy Gao Gao, their female panda, Bai Yun, has given birth twice. They didn’t even have to artificially inseminate her, as Gao Gao was reportedly up to the task time and time again. And now, after a third mating, another baby panda is on its way this summer.

It’s widely known that the Memphis Zoo’s pandas have had trouble in bed this year. The female, Le Le, sent the right scent signals and the zoo even turned on some porn, but her male companion Ya Ya just wasn’t interested. He seemed to prefer munching bamboo bars and napping to making the beast with two backs. The cad. (He obviously has issues.)

After Le Le retired to her room, desolate, Memphis zookeepers tried artificial insemination. We’re not sure if that’s worked yet, but we do think the San Diego Zoo is on to something. The Memphis zoo should just trade in the ambivalently male Ya Ya for the studly Gao Gao and let him do his stuff. We’re betting he could make Le Le go go.

-Cherie Heiberg

Categories
News

Ford Trial: Overdoing the Obvious


BY
JOHN BRANSTON
 
|
APR 24, 2007

Every writer needs a good editor. And so does every prosecutor.

Assistant U.S. attorney Tim DiScenza closed out the government’s case against former state senator John Ford Tuesday with a two-hour-and-twenty-minute closing argument. Coming at the end of a long day, the performance may not have helped the government’s already powerful case. In fact, it may have struck some jurors as being exactly what the defense team has been saying about the pursuit of Ford: overzealous.

Defense attorney Michael Scholl will make his closing argument Wednesday. It’s a good bet that it will be shorter than DiScenza’s if he wants to score points with the jury.

DiScenza played snippets of a dozen or so tapes the jury had already seen and heard two or three times. The tapes clearly showed Ford doing favors for E-Cycle Management in exchange for payments.

But they were no longer new. As U.S. District Judge Daniel Breen told jurors, closing arguments are just that – argument, not evidence. The government had already summarized its case with a summary witness, FBI agent Mark Jackson, and a time line.

And on Tuesday, jurors had already sat through a three hour and thirty minute lunch break while the judge and attorneys worked out some undisclosed procedural matters apparently involving a juror who was excused.

DiScenza, a veteran career prosecutor who has already won two convictions in Tennessee Waltz trials, started off well enough with a legal maxim that goes something like this: “If you have the facts, argue the heck out of the facts. If you have the law, argue the heck out of the law. If you don’t have the facts or the law, then accuse the government of misconduct and argue entrapment.

That is what Scholl has been doing for two weeks. He called only three defense witnesses, and John Ford was not among them. Unlike his brother, Harold Ford Sr., who made a memorable stand against prosecutors in his 1993 corruption trial, John Ford decided not to testify.

DiScenza finished strong, too.

“Who’s got the power?” he said, voice rising. “Only twelve people have the power to stop this. And that is the twelve of you who go back into that jury room.”

But the ending may have come roughly two hours too late. Closing argument is a last chance to persuade the jury with personality, charm, and rhetorical skills. But every speaker and every writer knows that attention flags after 30 minutes for even the great ones. And a story you have heard three times already is not a great one, no matter who is telling it.

Possibly making matters worse, earlier in the day assistant prosecutor Lorraine Craig drew the assignment of cross-examining Ford’s twenty-something girlfriend, a perky young woman who suggested undercover FBI agent L.C. McNeil may have done some unauthorized undercover work under the covers with a girlfriend in Miami after partying with Ford and friends one night. McNeil had denied the suggestion last week, but Craig bored in so hard on the witness, Mina Knox, that Breen interjected at one point.

In short, if there was a ray of hope for the defense after the proof was in, it was that one or more jurors would hang the panel. After Tuesday, that seemed like less of a Hail Mary than it had a day earlier.

Categories
Book Features Books

Memphis Magazine Fiction Contest

Can you write a compelling short story? A thousand bucks could be in it for you— not to mention publication of your grand prize entry. So sit yourself down at that ole keyboard and get to work. But first, check out the rules of the annual fiction contest sponsored by our sister publication, Memphis magazine.

Cosponsors are Burke’s Book Store and Davis-Kidd Booksellers. Go to www.memphismagazine.com and click on Fiction Contest 2007.

Categories
News

Barack Snake Moan

Memphis director Craig Brewer’s Black Snake Moan may have fizzled at the box office, but the Memphis filmmaker has left us with some lingering iconography.

Really, how long did you think it would take before somebody suggested that Barack Obama should chain Hillary Clinton to a radiator?

Until about now?

Categories
News

Timberlake to Bring Sexy Back to Golf

A Website called Londonnet reports the following: “Justin Timberlake wants to become a professional golfer.

“The 26-year-old singer is getting so good on the greens he is hoping to land a place on the Professional Golf Association (PGA) circuit.

“A source said: ‘Justin is a very keen golfer and he’s playing to a very high standard now.'”

Golf fanatic Justin – who plays off a six handicap and is a member of Los Angeles’ exclusive Sherwood Country Club – is determined to fulfil his ambition before he is 30 and is practicing as much as possible.”

And, we might add, we’re quite “keen” on the idea of ol’ JT getting a sponsor’s exemption to the St. Jude tournament in Memphis this year. Hell, he could probably beat John Daly these days.

More?

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

FROM MY SEAT: In Through the Out Door

With a nod to Led Zeppelin, there are transition years,
and then there’s 2007 for the Memphis Grizzlies. It’s hard to imagine a
professional sports franchise being in more flux than the local NBA outfit,
particularly when you consider that the face on all four levels of operations —
ownership, front office, head coach, star player — may well be different when
the next season opens in November. Even more compelling is the fact that the
tipping point for the entire transformation happens to be as small and light as
a ping-pong ball.

Whether you interpret this on a literal or metaphorical level,
the Grizzlies’ position in June’s draft is going to make all the difference in
the world for all four levels mentioned above. Should Memphis land either the
first or second pick — and with it a franchise-player-to-be in either Greg Oden
or Kevin Durant — there will be new life for a franchise still looking for its
first playoff win.

On the other hand, should their preponderance of ping-pong
balls in the lottery hopper get the Grizzlies no better than third — Al Horford
anyone? How many season tickets will Joakim Noah sell? — shoulders will slump
as if Bryant Reeves’ latest paycheck just came due.

Here’s a look at what we can expect, from the owner’s
box to the court, as the Grizzlies’ Summer of Change unfolds:

OWNERSHIP — Here’s the beautiful, cold truth
about capitalism: you can sell your product, service, or talent for precisely
what the market will pay. Not a penny more. (There are thousands of home-sellers
across the country who would be happy to advise Grizzlies owner Michael Heisley
about the reality of moving inventory in a sagging, war-weary economy.) Heisley
may want $252 million for his 70-percent share of the franchise. To this point,
not a solitary buyer has stepped forward with a check near that amount. And
considering the draft lottery is May 22nd, Heisley’s recently established
deadline of May 1st for any offers appears to be at least three weeks premature.

With the image of Brian Davis and Christian Laettner holding up uniforms at a
press conference — their shabby bid being the best Heisley has seen to this
point — we armchair economists have to believe the franchise is overpriced. But
imagine what Oden or Durant might do for the lowest average attendance (14,654)
in the NBA. May 1st is no deadline, Mr. Heisley. Come May 22nd, you can either
name your price, or determine how much it should be lowered.

MANAGEMENT — Based on his comments last Tuesday
— “I’m not a youngster anymore” — the legendary Jerry West will ride off into
the Memphis sunset come July 1st. West says he’ll remain with the team long
enough to find the new coach and, presumably, a replacement (or two?) for
himself. Before West’s arrival in 2002, the Grizzlies employed a pair of
front-office decision-makers in Dick Versace and Billy Knight. Among the
dynamics to consider is just how much impact on personnel decisions the new head
coach will be allowed. Even with West’s hinted departure, though, that ping-pong
ball would seem to carry some weight. How could Mr. Logo pass up the chance to
help build a team around Oden or Durant?

COACH — Until now, Marc Iavaroni’s claim to fame
was being the fifth starter for the 1982-83 world champion Philadelphia 76ers, a
team that featured All-Stars Julius Erving, Moses Malone, Andrew Toney, and
Maurice Cheeks. This offseason, Iavaroni’s will be the hottest name among
head-coach candidates. (And that Italian surname fits perfectly into the recent
trend of basketball bosses in the Bluff City: Calipari, Fratello, Barone.) What,
precisely, can Iavaroni bring a franchise significantly shy of the firepower he
currently enjoys as an assistant with Phoenix? Once again, it all depends on
that ping-pong ball. With Oden or Durant at FedExForum, the idea of “pushing”
offensively is a lot more palatable than it was in 2006-07. Whether or not the
Suns are still playing beyond May 22nd, Iavaroni would be wise to see how the
lottery shakes out before making a decision on his future.

STAR — Pau Gasol may not have burned a bridge
with his trade request last winter, but he sure lit a match. Having watched
Gasol for six years now, Memphis fans understand he’s what might be called a
“complementary All-Star” (see Scottie Pippen, James Worthy, or Kevin McHale).
With Gasol as lead-bear — both on the floor and in the press — the Grizzlies
plateaued with three winless playoff appearances. If Memphis lands one of the
prize draft picks this June, Gasol may be able to step back and merely excel as
Robin to a rookie Batman in 2007-08. If Memphis falls to third in the draft, the
franchise should seriously consider finding a deal that brings more youth and
financial flexibility. After all, without Oden or Durant, the rebuilding is
going to take some time.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Ford Trial: Whose Timing is Off?


BY
JACKSON BAKER
 |
APR 23, 2007

As testimony in the Ford trial resumed Monday, FBI witness Mark Jackson presented a “timeline” of the events which, inexorably by the government’s account, led former state Senator Ford into criminal conduct on behalf of the bogus electronics firm E-Cycle.

Not so, countered defense attorney Mike Scholl, whose cross-examination seemed designed to show suspicious gaps in the timeline between April and July of 2004.

In between, as Scholl led Jackson to acknowledge, were conversations between Ford and government agents on matters unrelated to E-Cycle, as well as conversations between the FBI principals themselves concerning the desirability of making contact with Ford.

Specifically, undercover informant Tim Willis was asked by FBI agent Joe Carroll to attend Ford’s birthday party in May, and agent “L.C. McNeil” (the name is a pseudonym) later implored Ford to attend a Black Film Festival in July ’04 that segued into an E-Cycle-sponsored leisure event.

Scholl noted some dialogue that he suggested amounted to efforts to rope Ford into illegal complicity with E-Cycle (Jackson maintained, as the government had before, that the comments were harmless and unrelated to the sting)

Neiher point of view on the matter — the government’s nor the defense’s — was new, since the difference of opinion (or of interpretation) had received ample attention earlier in the trial.

What was new in the trial was the presentation in court of a much-discussed $50,000 Rolex watch that the government insists was given to Ford by developer Rusty Hyneman in return for specific legislative favors. It has been brought into evidence in this trial to buttress the government’s claim that it had properly “predicated” Ford as a suspect — i.e., demonstrated his disposition to illegal activity.

When the watch was presented in a preliminary hearing earlier this year, it had somehow lost proper time from the point that it was taken off Ford’s wrist in May 2005 when he was arrested in Nashville. That made it a handy trope of sorts for the argument between the two sides Monday over the timing and meaning of conversation and events.

When court adjourned for lunch, presiding judge Daniel Breen noted that the expensive watch should be secured.

As part of the aftermath to that statement, members of the two teams began engaging in light-hearted banter. For what was almost surely the first time since the trial began two weeks ago, Ford took part in such conversation, trading jokes back and forth with FBI agents Jackson and Brian Burns, evidently about the watch.

That bit of activity may or may not indicate something about subdued levels of tension on Ford’s part. When Jackson leaves the stand, the defense will begin presenting its own case, presumably Monday afternoon.

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

Grizzlies Desperately Seeking a Winner

This week, just after the Grizzlies’ have finished their season — will officially mark shopping season for our favorite NBA franchise.

SI.com’s Chris Ekstrand breaks down which names will headline this year’s free-agent market, and which players will be seeking greener pastures.

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

Brentwood vs. TSAA Goes to Supreme Court Again

A 10-year-old case that originated in Tennessee was heard in the U.S. Supreme Court last week. It all began in 1997 when football coach Carlton Flatt of Brentwood Academy — a private school south of Nashville — sent letters to a dozen eighth-graders inviting them to attend Brentwood’s summer football camp.

The Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (TSSAA) argued that the gesture violated their athlete recruitment policy. Brentwood countered that said policy restricts freedom of speech.

Back in 2001 the high court ruled in favor of Brentwood, saying that the TSSAA behaved in a quasi-governmental fashion. An appeals court also ruled in favor of the school, saying that the First Amendment protected the recruiting letters as an act of free speech.

The Court decided to reopen the case, however, and hopes to have the matter resolved by late June.

Hooray tax dollars!