BY
JACKSON BAKER |
MAY 9, 2007
This will come as real news to most Memphians: Our city has
a bona fide declared presidential candidate – David F. Diamond (ne Fentress) –
who has just been attacked by another presidential candidate, Colorado
Republican congressman Tom Tancredo, as something of a mad scientist. By our
reckoning, it’s Tancredo (pictured) who sounds more like a mad scientist. But judge for
yourself.
In last week’s televised MSNBC debate featuring 10 GOP
contenders, each of the candidates got at least one question emailed in by a
viewer of the program. Tancredo’s came from independent Diamond, a former radio
personality and conservative activist whose chief campaign plank is a concern
for facilitating organ transplants.
Jim VanderHei, executive editor of Politico.com, read the
question this way: “David Diamond of Memphis writes in: ‘Do you have a plan to
solve the shortage of organs donated for transplant?'”
Here, in its entirely, is the response from Tancredo,
hitherto best known for his adamant opposition to amnesty for illegal
immigrants, whom he wants treated as felons:
“”Well, I don’t believe that the goal of the United
States..that the president of the United States should be putting forth a plan
to do such a thing. The reality is that technology and the advent of technology
in a variety of areas is going at a pace where, I believe, we can look
forward…we can look forward to a variety of things that will allow us to cure
diseases that we do not have a cure for….”
Tancredo then went on something of a bender.
“But the idea that I take is inherent in this question –
that we should somehow be growing these things, that we should somehow be
cloning people for the purpose of using these kinds of, uh, attitudes is
ridiculous. I absolutely would not support it.”
Growing these things? Using these kinds of, uh,
attitudes?
Okay, David, the debate’s on. You have 30 seconds (or more
if you need it) for a rebuttal.