Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Houses Divided

Back in the days of the old Solid Democratic South (roughly, the 100-year period from the end of the Civil War to the civil rights revolution), such political disputes as existed below the Mason-Dixon line were either factional within Democratic ranks or were based on local or personal or occasionally ideological rivalries.

This was especially the case in border-state Tennessee, where the switch-over from Democratic to Republican control was later in coming than in the Deep South (though ultimately just as profound and sweeping).

In the Tennessee legislature, the most ferocious rivalries, even into the current century, were not between the two major parties. They involved power struggles between prominent Democrats — such as those between state senator Steve Cohen (D-Memphis) and foes like fellow Democratic senators Bob Rochelle (D-Lebanon) and Jim Kyle (D-Memphis).

(The ill feeling between Cohen and Kyle persists even to the present day, with the two antagonists in separate bodies — Cohen now serving as congressman from Memphis’ 9th District and Kyle holding on as leader of the rump group of Democrats in the state Senate.)

Republicans, whose foothold in East Tennessee grew slowly over time (until it began to expand geometrically and geographically in the last decade), were onlookers.

Famously and with unprecedented speed, that situation reversed itself with the statewide elections of 2008, 2010, and 2012. It is Republicans who now totally dominate state government and own what are referred to as “super-majorities” in the General Assembly. The roll call speaks for itself — 26 Republicans to seven Democrats in the state Senate; 71 Republicans to 27 Democrats and one independent in the House.

The roles are now reversed in the legislature, and it is the Democrats who are the onlookers, hoping to get a few crumbs from the table or to pass a few non-controversial measures with GOP indulgence.

There has to be some rejoicing in Democratic ranks, however, and some desperate, hopeful crossing of fingers regarding better days to come, after the contentious way in which Republicans fell out with each other in the waning days of the 2013 session of the General Assembly, which ended Friday.

Never mind that that’s probably wishful thinking. It had to be fun for Democratic legislators to hear Representative Bill Sanderson (R-Kenton) thunder his denunciation of SB 780/HB 636, prescribing a new formula for assigning judicial districts in Tennessee. This was a pet bill pushed relentlessly by Lieutenant Governor Ron Ramsey (R-Blountville), the Senate speaker and the driving force for most of the last three years of the Republican majority and of the legislature itself.

“This bill, friends and colleagues, came from the Senate. … We are just as equal as the other chamber across the hall. Believe it or not, you belong to a chamber that is autonomous. We are the people’s chamber. They have been dictating to us from the get-go. … This bill has been crammed down our throat. … Let’s draw the line today!”

See clip:

Get Microsoft Silverlight

The line was indeed drawn, dramatically and overwhelmingly. The Ramsey-backed bill failed in the House by a vote of 28 for and 66 against — a majority of GOP members choosing to overrule the Senate’s Republican master.

The result further widened the schism between the chambers, between the speakers, Ramsey and state representative Beth Harwell (R-Nashville) in the House, and between one set of Republicans and another.

Ramsey’s response to the rebuff was to pass the word to his membership of his resolve to keep off the floor a bill to strengthen the state’s authorizing authority over new charter schools (HB 702/SB 830) that had passed the House overwhelmingly the day before, and was dear to the heart of both Harwell and Nashville mayor Karl Dean. Realizing the futility of trying to bring the bill up for a vote, Senate sponsor Dolores Gresham (R-Somerville) allowed it to be referred to the calendar committee, meaning it won’t be considered again until next year.

Democrats in both chambers, who had opposed the bill, were overjoyed.

Harwell was furious. Asked after the session had ended how “disappointed” she was that the bill had not been brought to the Senate floor, she answered, “Very … the votes were there.”

It was telling, too, that, unlike last year, the two speakers did not participate in a joint press conference with each other or with Governor Bill Haslam.

Grabbed by reporters on his way out of the Senate chamber, Ramsey was candid. Asked if the fate of the charter authorizer bill was related to that of the judicial redistricting measure, he replied, “Somewhat.” Though, when asked, he declined to use the word “retaliation,” he acknowledged, “I thought the judicial redistricting bill should pass. It didn’t. That’s where we are. … It’s not holding bills hostage. It’s that one body doesn’t agree with the other body.”

Shortly thereafter, Haslam did have a brief meeting with reporters, in tandem with the two chambers’ majority leaders, state representative Gerald McCormick (R-Chattanooga) and state senator Mark Norris (R-Collierville).

The governor conceded that not only the charter authorizer bill, which he, too, had favored, but another measure he wanted as part of his educational package, the creation of a pilot voucher system for public schools, had failed — both (though he chose not to dwell on the fact) because of dissension in Republican ranks.

“The great charter schools … we’re trying to attract to Tennessee … won’t come unless they think they have a good chance of getting approved,” Haslam lamented.

He made do by emphasizing other matters he regarded as successes — a pruned-down budget, a cut in certain taxes, the augmenting of the state’s rainy-day fund, increases in K-12 funding, changes in workers’ compensation laws, etc.

About the fallout between the two chambers and their leaderships, McCormick shrugged: “If there’s not a little tension between the Senate and the House and the governor’s office, we’re probably not doing our jobs. That’s how government works. There ought to be some tension.”

Clearly, there is, and it remains to be seen how much of it remains and how divisive the effect of it on the GOP supermajority is in the next legislative session.

See clip of complete post-session press conferfence with Governor Haslam and majority leaders McCormick and Norris:

Categories
Letter From The Editor Opinion

Letter From the Editor: The Boston Bomber

The capture of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev sparked a debate about whether he should be charged as an American citizen (which he is) or as an “enemy combatant.” If it’s the latter, he presumably could be interrogated by whatever “enhanced” methods are deemed to be most effective — methods that could not be legally used on an American citizen charged with a crime, no matter how heinous.

Dzhokhar’s older brother, Tamerlan, was not an American citizen and had possible connections with radical Islamacists in Chechnya, so it appears that there was a political motive behind the bombings on his part.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev apparently shared those beliefs at some level, but as a teenager, it’s possible he was manipulated by his brother. He may have even been a minor when his indoctrination began. As an enemy combatant, he’d be subject to interrogation by federal agents behind closed doors. His only defense would be how well he could stand up to whatever physical and psychological techniques were used.

Timothy McVeigh, who bombed the Oklahoma City federal building and killed 168 people, in what was no doubt an act of terrorism, was tried as a U.S. citizen, though you could argue the case that he was an enemy combatant of the U.S. and was a member of an organization dedicated to bringing down the government. I’m sure federal agents and law enforcement officials would have been delighted to have been able to waterboard McVeigh into a confession without a pesky attorney around. But we did it the right way, and the system worked. McVeigh was tried, convicted, and executed. His accomplices were also caught and convicted.

Those who favored classifying Dzhokhar Tsanaev as an enemy combatant did so mainly because they thought we’d get better information on his possible terrorist group ties by using enhanced interrogation. But what if he had no terrorist ties, just a controlling big brother who did? Is it worth torturing an American citizen to find out, no matter how horrific his crime? I don’t think so, and thankfully, neither does this administration.

I believe the police and the FBI have done excellent work in solving this case and bringing the accused to face justice. Similarly, Dzhokhar’s terrorist connections, if any, will be thoroughly investigated. We should let the American justice system finish the job. If we stoop to torture and ignore the Constitution whenever it seems expedient, it jeopardizes every American’s right to a fair trial.

And if that happens, then, well, yeah, the terrorists win.

Bruce VanWyngarden

brucev@memphisflyer.com

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

A Boy’s Life

With his first two films — Shotgun Stories and Take Shelter — Little Rock-bred, Austin-based writer-director Jeff Nichols built a reputation for fruitfully filtering the poetic naturalism of Terrence Malick through pulpier genre prisms. With Shotgun Stories, it was a Southern “family feud” about opposed trios of half-brothers. With Take Shelter, it was one character’s zeitgeist-tapping, is-it-real-or-is-he-crazy hint at looming cataclysm.

With his third film, Mud, Nichols — younger brother of Lucero lead singer Ben Nichols, whose voice can be heard on the film’s soundtrack — weaves this Malickian influence with something probably closer to the roots of his film fandom: the boy’s-adventure format of ’80s Spielberg.

Matthew McConaughey plays the title character, a drifter hiding out on a river island in Arkansas (the film was shot in and around Dumas, Dewitt, and Stuttgart), and he adorns the film’s poster. But the protagonist is 14-year-old Ellis (Tye Sheridan, who made his debut in Malick’s The Tree of Life), who is first seen sneaking out of his family’s boathouse as his parents (Ray McKinnon and Sarah Paulson) argue.

Ellis and his pal Neckbone (Jacob Lofland) have heard about a boat that got lodged high in the branches of a tree after the latest floods and set out to find it. But after they scurry up into this God-given treehouse, they discover the signs — a half-eaten loaf of white bread, cans of Beanee Weenee, a fresh footprint with a cross in the heel — of another inhabitant. This turns out to be Mud, whom they see back on the sandbar, a pistol in his jeans and a snake tattoo looping around his shoulder.

Mud suggests danger but also romance, and the boys — especially Ellis — grow entranced by his story: He’s on the run from bounty hunters after killing a man who abused his true love, Juniper, and now he’s hiding out on the island, waiting for her to come.

As in kid-centric Spielberg films such as E.T. or The Goonies, the adventure here is also a mechanism for negotiating regular-life issues, and, for Ellis, adulthood is fast approaching. The larger-than-life Mud and his doomed love for the equally otherworldly Juniper (Reese Witherspoon, in a brief but effective turn) come across almost like a manifestation of Ellis’ own romantic confusion. Ellis is grappling with the impending separation of his embattled but well-meaning parents as well as the complicated interaction with an older teen he perceives as a first girlfriend. In the context of these life experiences, the escapade with Mud is part farewell to childhood and part expression of a romantic ideal.

But where those Spielberg films were aimed at children, Mud is an adult film likely to tap into viewers’ childhood memories. Mud is more contemplative than audiences drawn to a crime/adventure film starring McConaughey might expect or want. Nichols’ camera lingers on sunlight burrowing through tree branches, spiders trawling across tree bark, and a foreboding nest of cottonmouths in a muddy creek. The film does open up into a couple of action sequences, but this coming-of-age daydream stays grounded in an authentic sense of place and a sharp feel for small-town, working-class reality.

Mud

Opening Friday, April 26th

Cordova Towne Cinema and Ridgeway Four

Categories
Opinion

Gentrify My Historic Neighborhood, Please

There seem to be some concerns about gentrifying Midtown if the Sears Crosstown project is completed.

I say we should be so lucky. Gentrification, a fancy word for raising property values and the quality of neighborhoods, is a good thing, not a bad thing. If the Crosstown planners who want to turn the Sears building into a vertical urban village can’t understand that then I don’t know why they’re fooling with this monster.

My perspective on the Sears building comes, daily, from the front door of my house in the Evergreen Historic District three blocks from Sears, where the summer sun sets behind the tower. My wife and I bought our house in 1984, raised our children here, sent them to Snowden school down the street, and have welcomed and said good-bye to a succession of mostly exemplary neighbors. Friends who live in East Memphis or the suburbs or other cities say we live on a good street. We agree.

We paid $86,500 for the house. The county appraisal we got in March values it at $204,200, an average annual increase of 3 percent over 29 years in which we put on a few roofs and added a new garage, central air, and a bedroom-to-bathroom conversion. This compares to the nearly 9 percent annual return on the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the same period of time. If only . . .

Granted, I have taken pains to keep the county appraisal low because it means lower property taxes, and we don’t plan on moving any time soon. On the other hand, this is a big chunk of our retirement plan, and if we did decide to move we would want to get top dollar.

One reason appraisals are all over the place in this part of Midtown is because of the notoriously uneven quality of the houses. There are a bunch of relatively new houses built on the old expressway corridor in the 1990s, several classic bungalows and four-squares that are 100 years old, and quite a few blighted wrecks. Some of them are occupied, some are not. A stone’s throw from my place is a rental for college students. Some people would describe them as members of Richard Florida’s creative class. The owners of the house, since 1989, own a small business in Midtown. They get rental income. The students are able bodied. But for whatever reason, nobody believes in house or yard maintenance. Every year, the neighbors have to notify code enforcement, which does what it can.

This is the story of Midtown. For every dump, there are four or five houses that are well kept, sometimes at great cost. A couple of fix-ups on our street were featured in the HGTV television program “Best Bang For Your Buck.”
Bless ’em.

My friend Carol Coletta, a Memphian who studies and speaks about cities for a living, says “cheap cities are cheap for a reason.” Memphis is a cheap city. Nashville isn’t. We could use some Nashvillization in our neighborhoods. I am not at all sure that Midtown needs more housing on the scale the Crosstown planners envision. A case can be made that it needs less housing. There are good, 1999 houses with 1700 square feet of living space two blocks from Sears Crosstown on the market today for $118,000 and older houses selling for much less than that.

The neighborhoods around Sears Crosstown are affordable. They are not in any danger of becoming unaffordable due to gentrification. That is as wild an exaggeration as the fear-mongering stories about Kroger’s at Poplar and Cleveland where many of us shop. Granted, 28 years ago there was a bombing at the old Kroger’s across Poplar where Walgreen’s is now, but, hey, stuff happens.

Seriously, rising property values, blight reduction, and increased home ownership are good things for neighborhoods and for Memphis at large. If this is gentrification, bring it on.

Categories
Memphis Gaydar News

Dining Out for Life

Picture_4.png

On Thursday, April 25th, select Memphis restaurants will be giving a portion of their proceeds to local HIV/AIDS organization Friends for Life as part of the national Dining Out for Life event.

Friends for Life is a nonprofit that provides housing, wellness education, support services, and more to Memphians living with HIV/AIDS. They also provide free HIV tests and prevention services to the region.

Some restaurants are giving a portion of all sales, while others are only giving a portion of sales from one meal. Some are including alcohol sales, and others are not. And the percentage that restaurants choose to give varies. Here’s a breakdown of who is giving what:

Donating 50%
Andrew Michael Italian Kitchen — Dinner only

Imagine Vegan Cafe — Lunch and Dinner

Rizzos Diner — Dinner only

Stone Soup Cafe and Market — Breakfast only

Donating 25%

Alcenia’s — Lunch only

Alchemy — Dinner only

Bari Ristorante — Dinner only

Beauty Shop Restaurant — Dinner only

Blind Bear — Dinner only

Cafe Eclectic-Downtown — Lunch only

Cafe Eclectic-Midtown — Lunch only

Cafe’ Society — Lunch and Dinner

Celtic Crossing — Lunch and Dinner

Cooper St. 20/20 — Dinner only

Cortona Contemporary Italian Restaurant — Dinner only

Cozy Corner BBQ — Dinner only

DeJavu — Lunch only

eighty3 food and drink — Lunch and Dinner

Erling Jensen — Dinner only

Evelyn & Olive Restaurant — Lunch only

Felicia Suzanne’s — Dinner only

The Four Way Restaurant — Dinner only

Grawemeyer’s — Dinner only

The Green Beetle — Lunch only

Hog and Hominy — Lunch and Dinner

The Mad Earl — Lunch and Dinner

McEwen’s on Memphis — Dinner only

Memphis Pizza Cafe (Overton Square) — Dinner only

Mollie Fontaine Lounge — Dinner only

Mulan Asian Bistro — Lunch only

Napa Cafe — Lunch only

R.P. Tracks — Lunch and Dinner

Restaurant Iris — Dinner only

SkiMo’s — Dinner only

Sweet Grass — Dinner only

Table 613 — Lunch only

Donating 10%
Central BBQ (Central) — Dinner only

Central BBQ (Downtown) — Dinner only

Central BBQ (Summer) — Dinner only

Categories
Food & Drink Hungry Memphis

Memphis Brewfest Returns

beerfest_glass.jpg

  • Memphis Brewfest

The Memphis International Beer Festival, aka Memphis Brewfest, returns for its fourth year on Saturday, April 27th, 4-7:30 p.m., at AutoZone Park. The first year drew 1,800 — a near-capacity crowd — so getting folks to the event has never been an issue. What is? “The weather,” says organizer Martin Daniel, “is very important.”

No matter the forecast, the Memphis Brewfest happens rain or shine.

Daniel, who has a son with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, founded the festival as a fundraiser for the Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, with funds going to the Memphis Redbirds Foundation as well. The festival has raised $100,000 for the causes.

The festival offers 175 to 180 craft and international beers, ranging from Aech Schlenkeria Rauchbier to Yazoo Sue. Tickets are $41, with fest-goers getting a glass for sampling the beers and a map to guide them.

One thing new about this year’s Brewfest is that Budweiser of Memphis is on board as a sponsor. Budweiser of Memphis expanded its craft beer portfolio when it took over Southwestern’s craft beer division and now serves as the distributor for such beers as Ghost River and Yazoo. Beerfest’s other product sponsor is A.S. Barbaro, which distributes Coors products as well as Oatmeal Stout, Asahi, Schlafly, and many others.

Leading up to Brewfest is the first-ever Memphis Beer Week, a series of some 70 tastings, dinners, and other beer-related events being held across the city, put together by the folks overseeing the craft beers portfolio at Budweiser of Memphis.

Beer Week started Sunday and runs through April 27th. Events include the Yazoo Beer lunch on Friday, April 26th, at South of Beale. The lunch includes a selection of Yazoo beers paired with food. Yazoo beer will also be on special during the lunch, until 4 p.m. You can find a full schedule of Memphis Beer Week events on the excellent beer blog, fuzzybrew.com.