Categories
Art Art Feature

In the Picture

Memphis-born and Memphis College of Art-trained, artist Tommy Kha is fresh out of Yale with an MFA in photography and is making waves in the New York art world.

The past months for Kha have included group shows at Chelsea’s Aperture Gallery (“Shannon”) and Brooklyn’s Signal Gallery (“Blog, Re-Blog”). He is slated to be in the upcoming exhibition “Ego,” at Chicago’s Zhou B Art Center, as well as Miranda July’s project “We Think Alone.”

For “Blog, Re-Blog,” 100 photographers selected the work of another 100 photographers in order to invoke a sense of viral “sharing.” Kha was selected by up-and-coming photographer Bridget Collins, whose clean-hewn environmental work provides an interesting contrast to Kha’s dense portraiture.  

Collins chose Unity, a photograph of Kha’s in which a young, Asian woman, carefully made up, lies stomach down on a poster. The woman’s parted lips and glassy eyes exactly mirror those of the model on the poster. Both the model and her imitator gaze placidly at a point in the distance. This photo is from Kha’s most recent series, “A Real Imitation,” work that builds upon his previous collection, “This Graceland.”

As might be guessed from its “Graceland” title, Kha’s photography is largely set in Memphis. It takes place in the back rooms and storefronts of the city. Kha’s subjects pose amid flaking wallpaper and broken air-conditioning units. They wear maroon bathrobes in rooms full of packed boxes. These photographs seem drawn from a lost era, given that those “lost eras” never really existed but are the stuff of film and fiction. Kha’s scenes are cinematic: dramatically lit, pale, feathery, contrastive, or stark as needed.

But Kha is no nostalgia artist; he is a portrait photographer with a critical lens. His subjects seem to be in a lost world — an old Memphis — but they are not quite of it. Often, they gaze off into the distance, past their location and past the camera itself. They look into the source of the light.

Kha is well-versed in light. He cites William Eggleston as an influence, as well as German photographer Wolfgang Tillman, whose works include a retrospective simply called “Lighter.” When Kha moved from Memphis to go to Yale, he studied under Philip-Lorca diCorcia, the preeminent contemporary photographer and progenitor of the “staged” photograph. DiCorcia is a master of the scenographic photo, a feat that depends heavily on manipulated lighting.

Kha’s photographs show this education, as well as something of his own past growing up in a Memphis of neon lounge lights and white lace curtains. He says that even when making work outside of Memphis, he has been schooled in the South’s “visual cues.”

These cues have led him to make work that not only pays material tribute to Memphis (in the form of a wrought-iron window grate here or a canary-yellow chair there) but that heeds a Southern awareness of race, gender, class, and appearance. Kha’s early works, “Return to Sender,” “American Knees,” and “What’s My Line?” all directly address race.

For the “Return to Sender” series, Kha asked strangers to kiss him while he refused to kiss back. Besides being visually arresting photography, “Return to Sender” makes a clear point about perceptions of Asian men as passive sexually. For “American Knees,” Kha dresses up in yellow face. For “What’s My Line?,” he assumes costumes of different stereotypically appropriate careers for a young man of Asian heritage.

Kha credits photographer Diane Arbus with teaching him about “distinct levels of difference.” Where, in earlier work, Kha took up a more direct conversation about identity, his recent photography has a layering that is both visually literal and critically thorough. It is also mysterious, a quality that Kha uses to high effect.

Difference, in the “A Real Imitation” series, is played out through mirroring. Kha uses his adept sense of light to focus on one of light’s most salient effects: reflection. In the black of old TV screens, in aluminum foil, in windows and in mirrors, Kha’s subjects are subtly reflected. Or else they stand with someone else who is both a reflection and a grotesquerie of a reflection, as in one photo, where Kha (his own subject) stands half-naked next to a man several feet taller than him. They hold hands. They both wear black socks. They don’t look at each other.

The conversation on bodies, race, and sexuality is unavoidable in Kha’s work. The work is clearly about difference. But it is also about the subjects of difference. It is left for the viewer to ask what role the portrayed play in the world they inhabit.

tommykha.com

Categories
Letter From The Editor Opinion

Letter From the Editor: Highway 63 Revisited

I visited my hometown in central Missouri last weekend. Due to a confluence of family and high-school-related reunions and the annual Mexico (Missouri) Soybean Festival, I got to see a lot of folks I don’t see that often. Also, beer.

I’m happy to report my 93-year-old mama is doing well; my brothers and sister are doing fine; and all my old friends are good-looking and above average, despite someone’s smart-aleck comment about our reunion looking like the set from Cocoon.

One of my brothers returned to Memphis with me to spend a couple of days before flying back to his home in New Mexico. Rather than taking the usual I-70/I-55 route back, we decided to drive to the Bluff City via Highway 63, which wanders south from Jefferson City through the Missouri and Arkansas Ozarks like a string tossed on a rumpled blanket.

It was a beautiful Sunday morning in Missouri and we passed through (Play!) Freeburg, into the European section of Vienna and Vichy, then onto Licking, where we considered returning in a week’s time for the possibly interesting Licking Rodeo. Then came inexplicable Cabool and Koshkonong, followed by lisping Thayer and gorgeous Mammoth Springs. Next, it was into Arkansas, through touristy Hardy, south along the Spring River down to Black Rock, where the Ozarks end and the Delta begins and the road straightens out like a Pentecostal preacher on his way to Memphis.

My brother enjoyed his brief stay here, though he did almost spark an international incident when he tried to buy a six-pack of beer at a Midtown convenience store. Everything went fine until he was asked to show his ID.

After staring at it for a minute, the clerk said, “We can’t take this identification, sir.”

“What do you mean?” my brother said. “It’s a New Mexico driver’s license.”

“Sorry, sir, we can’t accept that ID here.”

“But it’s a state in the United States!

“I’ll have to check with my manager, sir.”

After checking with her apparently equally geographically challenged manager, my brother was not allowed to buy beer. Which raises a few questions: Foreigners are allowed to buy alcohol in the U.S., so even if these two morons thought my brother was from out of the country, why did it matter? Did they believe he was Mexican, meaning they routinely deny alcohol sales to Mexicans? And did they really think a 60-year-old white man with the last name “VanWyngarden” was Mexican?

It’s a puzzler. But we had a nice time, anyway, and my brother now has a great Memphis story to tell.

The next day, I drove my brother to Little Rock to catch a plane back to his home in New Mexico. It was a long drive, but necessary, I suppose, since Memphis no longer has international flights.

Bruce VanWyngarden

brucev@memphisflyer.com

Categories
Opinion The Last Word

The Rant

It’s worth noting that, in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision that took a wrecking ball to one of the pillars of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, new voter identification laws have spread throughout the South like kudzu. Certain states whose past actions indicated voter suppression, and were thus obliged to pre-clear any changes in election laws with the federal government, were freed to harness the old partisan mules and plow that rotted field. The surge in states voting to make major changes in voting laws looks like a map of the old Confederacy, including the recent additions of Alabama, Virginia, and North Carolina. 

Every week, another rebel state makes a symbolic secession from the union, in defiance of the federal government’s desire to uphold the right to vote. Only hours after the court’s decision. Governor Rick Perry of Texas announced that the strictest voter ID law in the country, which had been blocked by the government, would become effective “immediately.” In turn, last week the Justice Department filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas. Attorney General Eric Holder stated, “We will not allow the Supreme Court’s recent decision to be interpreted as open season for states to pursue measures that suppress voting rights.”

So, you may ask, “What’s the big deal? You need a photo ID to do everything from cashing a check to buying cigarettes. Besides, I’ve always presented my identification at the polls.” The facts are that before the 2006 mid-term elections, no state ever required a voter to produce a government-issued photo ID as a condition of voting. In the past, a driver’s license, a student ID, a utility bill, or any other proof of address was sufficient. The new voter ID laws sweeping the South require that voters obtain a special photo ID, given either for free or with a fee to recipients by the government to combat “voter fraud.” Critics say the laws disproportionately affect minorities, the elderly, and lower-income groups, because obtaining new, official state-approved voter ID cards can be a burden to those without transportation. Even free, state-issued IDs require a birth certificate, which costs $25 per copy and is often difficult for the elderly to locate. Many states eliminate the right of college students to vote on their own campuses, forcing a trip to their home state in order to exercise their franchise. For poor and minority voters, it’s the return of the poll tax, plain and simple.

A 2007 New York Times study found that in the previous five years, there were 86 convictions of voter fraud. The new laws are an antidote looking for an illness. Voter fraud today isn’t committed by some ward hack trying to register the dead; it’s done by voting machine irregularities and tampering by election officials. In presidential elections dating back to Clinton, there have been proven incidences of the miscounting of absentee ballots or the wholesale discarding of provisional votes, not to mention Bush v. Gore, the Super Bowl of vote tampering.

Do you remember the last election, when a state legislator in Pennsylvania bragged on camera that the commonwealth’s new voter ID law would deliver the state to what’s-his-name Romney? Minority voters turned out in droves. Out of the 30 states recently enacting changes in voter ID laws, all of them, with the exception of Rhode Island, have been introduced by Republican-led state legislatures. That includes the distinguished statesmen in the Tennessee House — the same ones who thought it was a good idea to allow guns in bars. If you don’t believe the intention of these laws is voter suppression, just watch the zeal of the GOP officials announcing the changes. And it’s not just voter ID laws: States under Republican control are reducing the number of early-voting days, reducing voting hours on Election Day, and eliminating Sunday voting, the day that many Southern African-American churchgoers traditionally have gone to the polls.

The Tea Party sticklers for fiscal responsibility conveniently discard that philosophy when it comes to disenfranchising black voters and resurrecting a new type of Jim Crow. Of course, a huge new government bureaucracy dealing with the creation and distribution of state-approved voter ID cards could certainly be a job creator and a stimulus of sorts. Of the estimated 21 million citizens without a government-issued ID, the great majority are Hispanics, African-Americans, and the poor. That’s enough to alter an election.

In 2012, a federal court found Texas’ voter ID law and redistricting plans to be discriminatory against particular racial and language groups — in other words, Democrats. After the recent Supreme Court decisions, the rulings of the federal court were thrown out. So, Texas Republicans are free at last. Recalling the long lines of people determined to cast their votes in the last election, regardless of restrictions, the foolish, Limbaugh-listening fundamentalists attempting to hold on to their dwindling political power by rigging the game will probably ignore the warnings of Colin Powell. The former defense secretary said, “These kind of procedures [which] make it likely that fewer Hispanics and African-Americans might vote … are going to backfire.”

There aren’t enough angry white men to go around anymore. Of course, the Supreme Court’s decision leaves it up to the legislative branch to determine which states are to be covered by the Voting Rights Act in the future. Considering the current, do-nothing Congress, any bets on who makes the list?

Randy Haspel writes the Born-Again Hippies blog, where a version of this essay first appeared.

Categories
News

The Fuente Era, Part Deux

Frank Murtaugh surveys the prospects for Coach Justin Fuente and his Memphis Tigers in the 2013 season in this week’s Flyer cover story.

Categories
Music Music Features

Reborn Trippy

For Memphis rap pioneers Three 6 Mafia, it was a long road to the top and a short stay. First formed in 1991, the group — led by the core duo of Juicy J and DJ Paul — built a regional empire the hard way, selling CDs out of proverbial car trunks before partnering with local indie distributor Select-O-Hits to branch out further.

By 2005, though, more than a decade of real-life hustle and flow finally paid off in a major way, with the Sony-released album Most Known Unknown topping both the rap and R&B album charts and a career-best single — the epic, nearly elegant “Stay Fly” — becoming the band’s most commercially and critically successful recording.

The following spring, the group found themselves the improbable owners, each, of a little gold statue named Oscar, winning Academy Awards for “It’s Hard Out Here for a Pimp,” from Memphis filmmaker Craig Brewer’s Hustle & Flow.

But what felt like a breakthrough at the time was soon revealed to be a culmination instead. The band swiftly traded in on their celebrity over their art, starring in the short-lived MTV reality series Adventures in HollyHood, and didn’t release a follow-up to Most Known Unknown until 2008’s Last 2 Walk, which, starting out quick but falling off just as quickly, broke a four-album streak of gold or platinum album sales. A long-rumored next album, Laws of Power, remains unreleased.

But a funny thing happened on the way back down: Co-founder Juicy J, who, like others in the group, had long moonlighted as a solo artist in mixtape and indie form, found himself with both a grassroots hit in the form of the strip-club anthem “Bandz a Make Her Dance” and a fruitful new collaborator in the form of younger breakout rapper Wiz Khalifa, who later made Juicy J a partner in his Taylor Gang imprint.

In the youth-oriented world of commercial hip-hop, artists aren’t supposed to reinvent themselves, win over new fans, and find new levels of popularity more than 20 years into a career. But Juicy J, whose major-label solo debut, Stay Trippy, was released via Columbia Records on August 27th, is living proof that it can happen.

“It’s a blessing, man,” Juicy J says of his journey, initial humility morphing into well-earned pride. “It’s hard to stay in this game. It’s one minute you’re hot, the next minute you’re not. To be an OG from then to now that’s still moving forward, almost like a brand-new artist, is huge. You can’t count many rappers that have done that.”

This solo reinvention was not by design.

“It wasn’t planned. I didn’t expect it. I was just doing mixtapes,” Juicy J says by phone from Pittsburgh, where he was airport-bound to make a Las Vegas show. “I just never gave up. I felt like I still had so many songs in me that people needed to hear, so I just kept working. Then, all of a sudden, my name started getting out. People started noticing and paying attention.”

Unlike most rappers who build an online following to attract label attention, Juicy J was already signed to Columbia, but being signed to a major and having them actually release an album are two very different things, as too many local rappers can attest.

“I already had a deal, but they weren’t really pushing the song at first,” Juicy J says. “I put it out online for free. Gave it to the fans.”

It was the groundswell success of the single that got Columbia to refocus on an artist already in their stable.

“It’s harder now. You have to have a little bit of buzz going on for yourself,” Juicy J says. “Columbia was watching me while I was making my mixtapes. It took a minute for them to call me, but they saw what I was doing. [They thought,] this guy has hustled his way back up and gotten his name back out there, and he’s still signed with us. So they were happy about that. Which is all good. It’s all business. They’re putting me in a lot of work right now and pushing my album, but nothing is ever going to be easy. I’m still grinding and still hustling.”

“Bandz” has been followed by singles “Show It,” “One of These Nights,” and the current “Bounce It,” which is smoother than “Bandz” and features a surer rap flow from Juicy J. Among the high-wattage guests on these songs and others on Stay Trippy are rappers Wale, Young Jeezy, and Lil Wayne, R&B stars Trey Songz and Chris Brown, and hometown pop superstar Justin Timberlake. While the album has an illicit vibe, the violence that laced Three 6 Mafia’s music has mostly been exchanged for more realistic and perhaps more widely relatable vices in the form of drugs and strippers, as the album’s title and its smash single suggest.

“I think my solo stuff is a little different but with the same feel,” Juicy J says of the contrast. “We’re not living in 2002 or 1998 anymore. Back then, it was a different kind of grind. But when you hear the album, you can still hear the Three 6 sound, but it’s more polished and mixed with the new. It’s relevant but still has a feel of back-in-the-day.”

The evolution has opened up Juicy J’s music to a whole new audience.

“I’ve still got the old fans, but I have new fans now that don’t know nothing about Three 6,” says Juicy J, who says he’s maintained a primary residence in Memphis. “Some of them have probably never even heard of [the group]. They don’t even know about my past.”

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

Detoxing Drug Laws

When Congress returns to session in September, we will have a full plate, but it’s past time for the drug policy debate to move to the forefront.

At a cost of billions of dollars and with few positive results to show for it, 40 years of the War on Drugs has overcrowded our jails, perpetuated and exacerbated racial disparities in our society, and created a generation of Americans with little education and few job prospects.

For decades, I have fought for a fairer and smarter approach, particularly for marijuana. Finally, after many years in the political wilderness, I’m buoyed by rising public support for a better approach.

For the first time, a majority of Americans now support the legalization of marijuana — 52 percent according to a recent Pew Research poll.

This month, Attorney General Holder garnered bipartisan support for an overhaul to the Department of Justice’s draconian prosecution policies that have resulted in overly harsh and lengthy sentences — particularly for people of color.

His announcement follows the Fair Sentencing Act, which reduced the unfair and racially biased 100-to-1 sentencing disparity for those arrested for crack offenses — often low-income minorities — and those arrested with essentially the same drug in powder form — cocaine — who are more likely to be white.

And, in recent weeks, many have joined my call for President Obama to use his commutation power to help those who were convicted before the Fair Sentencing Act became law and are now serving sentences that no longer align with American priorities.

Public sentiment is building to reform our drug laws. Congress must catch up.

I am proud of my long-standing record on reforming our drug laws, though my positions have not always been politically popular. For example, in 1992, I was the sole opponent to repealing Tennessee’s medical marijuana law in the state Senate, and I was the author of the Tennessee Medical Marijuana Act to restore that important provision.

We must stop punishing those who are prescribed marijuana by their doctors to help treat the pernicious effects of cancer and other medical conditions. We should finally accept the reality that marijuana has many positive effects on a wide variety of patients.

As chair of the state and local government committee in the Tennessee Senate, I also led the fight against privatizing prisons, because I recognized that for-profit prisons would have an incentive to keep as many people locked up for as long as possible — including minor, nonviolent drug offenders who are now often incarcerated far longer than necessary for public safety. 

I also fought to end the “cash register justice” system, which encourages law enforcement agencies to pursue the wrong priorities. And I repeatedly pressed the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation to focus on hard drugs like meth, crack, and heroin rather than wasting their resources on marijuana. Unfortunately, those pleas fell on deaf ears at the time.

Since arriving in Congress, I’ve continued to lead the fight for drug reform and worked to push the administration and my colleagues in the right direction. I’ve spoken with and written directly to both President Obama and Attorney General Holder to share my concern with the direction of their drug policies, particularly about the government’s continued targeting of individuals and businesses who fully comply with relevant marijuana laws in their states.

As Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis said, states are “the laboratories of democracy.” If those laboratories are to make any sort of breakthrough, the federal government must give them that chance.

As a member of the House judiciary committee, I have also spoken directly to drug policy leaders, including FBI director Robert Mueller and drug enforcement administrator Michele Leonhart when they testified before the committee.

My message has been clear: People who pose no risk to society should not be in prison longer than necessary — if at all. We must reform our laws, and the president should commute the sentences of those serving outdated terms so that our nation can make better use of its increasingly limited resources.

Advocating for drug policy reform has often been a lonely pursuit. But I entered public service so that I could speak up on important issues, whether they were popular or not, and give voice to the voiceless.

After decades of fighting against a policy I thought was hurting this country — by throwing away the lives of millions of people and wasting precious resources — I’m pleased to see that public support is growing for those seeking to change these unjust laws. I’ll continue to lead the charge in Congress to see that our laws better reflect the values of our society.

Steve Cohen, a Democrat, is in his fourth term as the representative for Tennessee’s 9th Congressional District.

Categories
News

Home and Away

Bruce VanWyngarden on going home, coming back, and the nation of New Mexico.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Tennessee’s Chief Legal Officer Lays It On the Line

JB

Attorney General Cooper at Rotary

State Attorney General Robert Cooper was in Memphis this week, and he had strong views about keeping legal advice separate from politics and why the initials “A.G.” should not mean “Aspiring Governor.” And we had some thoughts about that.

Categories
News The Fly-By

Lights, Camera, Bath Salts

Write what you know — it’s one of the first lessons in any creative writing class. And that’s what worked for Dr. Giri Swami, whose new web television series, Headshop, was inspired by patients in Memphis emergency rooms suffering from the ill effects of synthetic drug abuse.

After treating numerous patients who had taken the synthetic amphetamine known as bath salts as far back as 2009 but finding little information on bath salts in medical journals, Swami headed to local head shops to find out more.

The result is Swami’s directorial debut, which is equal parts Sopranos, Mad Men, and Weeds with plenty of nudity, violence, and, of course, drug use. The story line centers around nine characters whose lives intersect at a local head shop, where a fictional designer drug similar to bath salts is being sold.

After coming up with the initial idea for Headshop, Swami overcame a number of obstacles before seeing his series take form. In addition to meeting people who made promises but didn’t deliver, Swami said he was amazed at the lack of infrastructure in the local filmmaking community.

“Being a doctor is very professionalized. There are all these licenses, all these tests. In the film world, there’s nothing like that,” Swami said. “I met people who were like, ‘I’m a producer’ or ‘I’m a writer,’ but they ended up not being able to do anything for me. The first round of production was extremely difficult. There was a lot of trial by fire, and it was probably the hardest thing I’ve ever done.”

After a successful second round of production, Headshop finally began to take shape in 2011. Shot in a little under 40 days, Headshop doesn’t look like a first attempt at directing, mostly because of the $400,000 budget largely supplied by Swami. In addition to professional editing and production, Swami also enlisted local professional actors and had members of alt-country act Lucero write an original soundtrack.

Actress Sommers Kelly said working with first-time director Swami was a learning experience, mostly due to the improvisations that Swami expected.

“Giri didn’t have experience with actors. He had to learn how actors prepare,” Kelly said. “Sometimes he wanted something done in five minutes, and it takes actors longer than that to get ready for a scene. It was a giant learning experience for everyone.”

After a successful screening two weeks ago at the Five-in-One Social Club, Swami decided to abandon his initial plan of charging a fee to view the final two episodes of Headshop, allowing for the whole series to be viewed on YouTube or Vimeo for free.

“I wanted to follow the Netflix plan, where you can watch the whole thing as you want,” Swami said. “If you want to watch [Headshop] once a week, you can, but I’m giving you the option.”

Viewership for Headshop has been strong since its initial screening, with 45 percent of viewers who watched episode one going on to episode two and 90 percent of those viewers watching episode three. Swami said that although he enjoyed creating a series, his next project will be a horror film shot in Memphis.

All six episodes of Headshop can be found on YouTube, Vimeo, or at Swami’s studio website, shockcollarstudio.com.

Categories
News The Fly-By

What They Said

About “Re-Segregation Claim Apparently Still Alive in School Merger Case”:

“I’m starting to wonder about the real relationship between Hopson, Cash, and Aitken. Sure seems like Cash and Aitken may be getting the last laugh, at least when it comes to the BOE. They left Hopson in a no-win situation and I’m wondering if they both knew that he would fail. Not that the BOE hasn’t hogtied him also, but, man, is he stepping in it this week. Who needs the media with Hopson’s sound bites!” — homersimpson

About “Nice Day for a Gay Wedding”:

“I wish nothing but the best for these couples. The fact they are married doesn’t mean my wife and I are under attack or that we’ll be affected in any way. I will only say as an observation that when an aggrieved, gender-confused few try to redefine something as fundamental as marriage, and expect everyone else to bow to it, it all seems incredibly self-centered to me.” — Niles4334

About “The Struggles of the Black Race”:

“Thanks for lifting up the rug for a minute, Louis. It’s amazing how much crap is accumulating there.” — Scott Banbury

About “Psssssst!” and the concept of privacy:

“Maybe not you, but the entire Western media spends way too much time analyzing the messenger instead of the message which sometimes, I think, is an intentional ploy propagated by … psssst … you know who.” — poots

About “The Rant” and MLGW’s “smart meters”:

“The flap over the smart meters is just silly. I participated in the pilot program and it’s great. This is nothing more than technological advancement. The reality is that at some point the job of meter reader will become obsolete along with the bank teller and any number of other professions.” — detmem

About “Who’s Who in Memphis Twitter”:

“What the hell is Twitter?” — loudersoft

Greg Cravens

Comment of the Week:

About “Memphis Is Fourth Cheapest City To Live In”:

“Memphis is the Dollar General of cities.” — barf