Categories
Food & Drink Hungry Memphis

Residents Share Concerns and Support at Truck Stop Community Meeting

Restaurateur Taylor Berger and attorney Michael Tauer, the duo behind the Truck Stop restaurant concept planned for the corner of Central and Cooper, held a standing-room-only community meeting tonight at First Congregational Church to discuss their plans and answer questions.

The latest design for the Truck Stops exterior

  • The latest design for the Truck Stop’s exterior

The Truck Stop is a hybrid concept that combines a restaurant serving small plates, adult beverages, and desserts with parking space for a rotating cast of three food trucks. Diners place their order for any menu item at the restaurant or from the food trucks’ menus at one counter so no one has to stand in line at a food truck. The trucks will stay on the lot for several hours at a time, and when they leave, other food trucks will take their place.

The indoor dining area

  • The indoor dining area

There are plans for an indoor dining area and a patio seating area in the back facing the existing rail line. The restaurant will be created using 12 to 16 metal shipping containers that will be cut up to create open spaces and areas for natural lighting. Customer parking on the small lot will be kept to a minimum (only 16 parking spaces) to allow for a more pedestrian-friendly design.

While many in attendance expressed support for the concept, concerns were raised about the industrial look of the shipping containers. Tauer and Berger are currently seeking a zoning variance to use the containers on the property. Although the space is currently zoned for industrial use and does allow shipping containers for such uses, a variance must be sought to use shipping containers for commercial use.

Others expressed concern that the Truck Stop would increase traffic at the already busy intersection of Cooper and Central. Currently, the Truck Stop’s design has one entrance (on Central) and one exit (on Cooper) for cars. But many residents said the exits and entrances should be switched so that cars exit on Central instead because the lane under the exiting railroad trestle on Cooper becomes clogged during rush hours.

Currently, that property is occupied by Midtown Nursery, and owner Michael Earnest was out of town when Loeb Properties, who owns the property, allowed Tauer and Berger to sign their 10-year lease for the Truck Stop. Earnest’s lease was up for renewal, and he claims he had a verbal agreement to renew. Tauer and Berger said they were not made aware that Earnest was being forced out of the property until after they’d signed the lease.

Several residents spoke up about that situation, asking if the Truck Stop could move to another location and allow Midtown Nursery to stay where it is. But Tauer said they have a legal obligation to stay at Central and Cooper now that the lease has been signed.

An especially tense moment came when Earnest, who was at tonight’s meeting, and Bob Loeb, owner of Loeb Properties, had a conversation in front of the meeting’s audience about the situation. Loeb offered to meet with Earnest in private to discuss the matter further. But Earnest’s daughter Whitney Taylor directed her concerns at Tauer and Berger.

“Why would you see an established business there [on Central and Cooper] and think you’d like be there?” Taylor asked.

“We would love to stay. We would love to be there,” Earnest told the room.

But despite the situation between Loeb and Midtown Nursery, Tauer said the Truck Stop was committed to the location. He said they were still open to tweaking the design, especially in ways that would ease the traffic congestion concerns.

Tauer and Berger plan to take their zoning variance request to the Board of Adjustment meeting in January.

Categories
News News Blog

AutoZone Park Purchase Deal Delayed by Memphis City Council

These new seats and more are are promised in upgrades to AutoZone Park as a part of a new purchase agreement with the city of Memphis.

  • These new seats and more are are promised in upgrades to AutoZone Park as a part of a new purchase agreement with the city of Memphis.

No deal to buy AutoZone Park was done by the Memphis City Council Tuesday night even after a long debate on the issue but the council will take up the issue again on Monday.

The council moved the purchase decision to the end of Tuesday’s full council meeting and recessed the meeting until Monday. Council members said they needed more time to make a decision on the deal.

Representatives of the St. Louis Cardinals and the city administration laid out a tight timeline for council members to get the deal approved. They said they needed the council approval Tuesday night to make necessary arrangement to close the deal by December 31.

Many council members complained they only received the large packet of purchase information Saturday night and that they did not have enough time to review the information and make a decision by Tuesday evening.

Cardinals and city officials openly referred to the deal as an “11th-hour” arrangement. Approval of the deal by the council would have set off a series of events to rush bonds on the stadium to the investment market. Many of those firms would begin to close their books on the year as the Christmas holiday approached.

Council member Janis Fullilove was frustrated by the timeline and unloaded a tirade when she was told the deal must be done Tuesday night.

“You waited until the 11th hour and now the pressure is placed on us,” Fullilove said. “Now, you say we have to approve this or it will flitter away and they’ll sell off the stadium piece by piece with the scoreboard going first.”

A plan that included the city’s purchase of the park became public last month. However, the $20 million price tag for the park was not known publicly until council members received their information packets over the weekend. City leaders said price would be paid without dipping directly into the Memphis city coffers.

The park would instead be paid for with a mix of tax credits, tax rebates, and lease payments from the Memphis Redbirds baseball team. The ballpark purchase is part of a larger deal that also includes the purchase of the Redbirds by the St. Louis Cardinals baseball team.

John Mozeliak, the general manager of the St. Louis Cardinals, told city council members Tuesday, the deal is “a unique opportunity for everyone involved.”

“It allows for input from all the stakeholders involved,” Mozeliak said. “No one has complete control and that’s a unique deal, frankly.”

Mozeliak said he wanted to “re-brand” baseball in Memphis and wants to “make sure Memphis has an asset moving forward and not a liability in that ballpark.”

On the city side, the deal has been shepherded by Robert Lipscomb, the director of the city’s Housing and Community Development division. Lipscomb said the purchase has been a “complicated deal” with some “11th-hour negotiations” but said it was a good deal for Memphis. Taking control of the park ensures the city won’t lose a major asset or let it deteriorate. Also, the deal won’t use any local taxpayer dollars, he said.

“If the Redbirds leave and the stadium does not have a tenant, it’s not an asset,” Lipscomb said. “Right now we have an asset and a redevelopment (plan) with none of it paid with city taxpayer dollars.”

The deal would come with about $20 million new investments in the ballpark. The city would pay for $5 million and the Cardinals paying for $15 million of them.

The improvements include new general admission seating on grassy hills (much like the existing Bluff section) on the left and right field corners of the park. A new concession stand and bar are planned for the new seating section in the left field corner. The photos also show a new LED board against the left field wall and updates to club-level bars and seating.

The park is now valued at $31 million, according to documents given to council members Tuesday. The $20 million price tag will be paid for mainly with an existing tax rebate program that directs all taxes collected at the park from tickets, concessions, and other items (about $25 million) back into the park. The Redbirds will also pay an annual lease of about $5 million annually.

The city will not operate nor manage the park. Those jobs will be left up to the Cardinals, according to the outline of the contract disclosed Tuesday.

If the city cannot reach a purchase deal on the park, Mozeliak said the Redbirds would fulfill their contract and play in Memphis next year. But after that, the team would likely be auctioned off and the stadium would likely go into forcelosure.

Categories
News

Dorsey Hopson Responds to Audit Finding $48 Million in Missing Equipment

The Shelby County Schools superintendent explains how the school system will deal with the results of an audit that says the school system is missing 54,000 pieces of equipment. Louis Goggans has the story.

Categories
News

City Council Approves Crosstown Funding

The Memphis City Council voted tonight to provide $15 million to the $175 million Sears Crosstown redevelopment project. Toby Sells has the story.

Categories
News News Blog

Crosstown Funding Approved by Memphis City Council

The Memphis City Council will invest $15 million in the Crosstown Development Project, laying the final piece of the funding puzzle for the $175 million project.

Housing and Community Development director Robert Lipscomb provided the council with a funding outline for the $15 million and claimed none of that money will come from the city’s general fund but rather federal dollars captured by the city.

The project was approved unanimously by those council members casting votes. Council members Harold Collins and Wanda Halbert abstained from the vote. Council member Kemp Conrad recused himself from the vote as his real estate firm provides some services for the project.

But the vote came only after a lengthy debate on the issue Tuesday. Council members supporting the project said it was crucial to the development of Memphis’ inner city. Those against it said Crosstown redevelopment is a “great project,” but argued too many questions lingered over the deal’s details.

“I understand the late day and the communication problems but those are ongoing issues and we should not let them get in the way of this opportunity,” council member Shea Flinn said. “At some point, we have to side with our dreams and ambitions instead of siding with our fears.”

Still, some said too much information was given too close to the vote and they lobbied to delay the decision for two weeks. Council members were given a presentation on the Crosstown project in March. But the final details of the project’s funding were only given to them Tuesday afternoon during the council’s executive session.

Council member Harold Collins said asking the council to make the decision with so little time and information was “disrespectful.” But a formal motion to delay the matter for two weeks was voted down by a majority of council members during the full council meeting Tuesday evening.

“I don’t think it is fair to ask this board for a vote on a $15 million project when you only gave us (the details) to us right after you presented it,” Collins said.

Dozens of Crosstown supporters clad in red “Crosstown Collaborative” T-shirts crowded the council chambers Tuesday evening, and they erupted in applause after the vote was recorded.

The city’s $15 million will fund infrastructure needs and site cleanup at the old Sears Crosstown building in the midst of the Evergreen, Vollinitine-Evergreen and Speedway Terrace neighborhoods.

In October, the Shelby County Land Use Control Board approved the redevelopment of the 1.5 million square-foot building into a “vertical urban village” that could become the home to healthcare clinics, a school, and more.

The total project cost is estimated to be $175 million, with the majority of that money coming from the building’s founding partners — Church Health Center, Methodist Healthcare, Gestalt Community Schools, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, ALSAC, Memphis Teacher Residency, Rhodes College, and Crosstown Arts.

Categories
News News Blog

SCS Superintendent Talks $48.4 Million In Missing Equipment

More than $48 million worth of school equipment is missing from Shelby County Schools.

The jaw-dropping amount was discovered after ProBar, a Maryland-based company, conducted an audit on both Memphis City Schools and Shelby County Schools prior to the merger. The company was unable to account for more than 54,000 pieces of equipment, which retails for $48.4 million of taxpayers’ money.

SCS district superintendent Dorsey Hopson held a media briefing on Tuesday, December 3rd to discuss the results of the inventory audit. During the briefing, Hopson said one of the SCS board’s primary objectives is finding out whether or not there is a particular school, warehouse, or building that has an extraordinarily high amount of equipment missing.

“We’ve got to do a deep-dive,” Hopson said. “There are still unanswered questions. There’s still inventory that’s missing. We’re directing staff to go back and keep looking, to see if there’s other stuff that they can find. Once we get a handle on what we have and what we don’t have, we’re going to look and see if there are hotspots. Are there places where there’s an extraordinary amount of things missing? And then we’re going to see if there is someone even still here that’s responsible.”

According to ProBar’s audit information, MCS suffered a 23 percent (more than 44,000 items) equipment loss over a 30-year period. SCS suffered a 18 percent (more than 10,000 items) loss over the same time frame.

Hopson said he thinks the missing equipment could be attributed to theft and poor inventory record keeping. He said if it’s determined that a person has taken equipment or “grossly mismanaged” items, job termination could be a potential disciplinary action taken as a result.

“We want to find what we know we have, but that does not veer away from the fact that we need to work on our internal control and make sure we are using our best efforts to safeguard what is essentially a taxpayers’ problem,” Hopson said.

Categories
News

Shangri-La Turns 25

Memphis’ iconic independent record store, Shangri-La, celebrated 25 years last weekend. Joe Boone has the story.

Categories
Calling the Bluff Music

Jason Da Hater Drops Visual To “Who Am I”

jasondahater.jpg

Memphis-bred emcee Jason Da Hater recently unleashed his EP, Like Vegetables, to the world. The nine-track installment is filled with original and somewhat comical wordplay over raw beats that will more than likely satisfy any fan of true hip-hop.

In support of the EP, Jason Da Hater has laced fans with a visual to the project’s track “Who Am I.” He uses the song to spew bars that explain who he is as a person over a beat crafted by Paragon (who also produced the entire EP). Filmed in Memphis, the visual displays clips of Da Hater during a performance as well as entertaining cameos by various friends as he raps downtown. The FedExForum even makes an appearance in the video.

Visit my website: ahumblesoul.com
Follow me on Twitter: @Lou4President
Friend me on Facebook: Louis Goggans

Categories
News

Gut-Check in Griz-Town

Kevin Lipe lays out four possible scenarios for the rest of the Grizzlies’ season. Two of them are not pretty.

Categories
Beyond the Arc Sports

Grizzlies Gut-Check: The Four Outcomes

Mike Miller came here to win a championship. How likely is that outcome for the Grizzlies?

  • Larry Kuzniewski
  • Mike Miller came here to win a championship. How likely is that outcome for the Grizzlies?

I think it’s time to have a little chat about the Grizzlies, this season, and expectations. There are four possible outcomes for this season for Grizzlies—four potential ways for the season to end. I’d like to take you through them and then talk about what we’re watching and what we’re likely to see when it’s all said and done for 2013-14.

Outcome #1: The Grizzlies have home court in the playoffs, return to the Western Conference Finals.

To my mind, this is the expectation of most Grizzlies fans going into training camp and preseason, even given the change from Lionel Hollins to Dave Joerger as head coach and the shuffling of deck chairs small roster moves made in the offseason. The Grizzlies seemed like a team that was one or two shooters and a less-tired Gasol/Randolph tandem away from making a serious run at an NBA title.

If I’m honest, though, I’m not sure this is ever a reasonable expectation. The Western Conference is even tougher this year than it was last year. There are 15 teams in the Eastern Conference and 15 teams in the West. As of right now, the West has 12 teams at or above .500 (and one more, Minnesota, at .474) and the East has 3. Yes, three. Rudy Gay’s Toronto Raptors are currently leading the Atlantic Division, and they have a 6-10 record.

My point is this: when the whole Western Conference is as good as it is, and all of these teams are competing at this high level, every single game counts. Rightly or wrongly—and believe me, I do not want to get into that debate here, regardless of how I feel about it, because it’s a done deal—the Grizzlies were coming into this season with a new head coach, and with a new head coach, it’s reasonable to expect an adjustment period. “Adjustment period” is a euphemism for “losing games.” Losing games means a worse seed, and in this year’s West, matching last year’s 56-win total was going to be a hard challenge even without changes at the top.

[jump]

Regardless of whether this was a reasonable expectation or not—and, I want to make clear that I do think it was a reasonable expectation, even though it’s not one I necessarily agreed with going into the season—I think we can safely say, now that the Grizzlies have gotten of to an 8-8 start and Marc Gasol is out “indefinitely” (but maybe 4 weeks, maybe 6), that this outcome is not the most likely one.

Is it possible for the Grizzlies to rally, play out the rest of the year going 48-18, lock up the third or the fourth seed, and make it back to the Western Conference Finals? Yes. It’s absolutely possible. Does it feel like this Grizzlies team is going to do that? If I’m being honest with myself—and thus with you, reader—no. Not to me.

Outcome #2: The Grizzlies make the playoffs, but they’re seeded somewhere from 5th to 8th.

The NBA season is almost exactly 20% of the way over, and we’re roughly 4-5 weeks into it. The Grizzlies are .500, with 8 wins and 8 losses. They played exceedingly badly at first, and then started to get it going on the road (which is where they’ve played all of their good games this year… so maybe we should go on and preemptively have someone cleanse the evil spirits that apparently came with Fly Lounge), but then Marc Gasol went down. If Marc Gasol only misses 4 weeks with his injury, and if (and it seems to be the best-case scenario) the Grizzlies go .500 while he’s out, the Grizzlies will be .500 40% of the way through the season, which would put them somewhere around 16-16.

In the West this year, I think 48-50 wins could potentially be the threshold for making the playoffs. Certainly no lower than 45. Let’s split the difference and say they finish 47-35. That would require the Grizzlies, who are theoretically 16-16 when Marc Gasol returns, to play the rest of the season out 31-19.

I think that’s probably reasonable. And that’s probably a 7th or 8th seed. To me, this is the most likely outcome for this year at this point, barring any further injuries or any earth-shaking personnel moves. I think the Grizzlies have too good of a roster no to play at a high level when everyone is on the same page—as we saw on their 4-0 West Coast road trip, where the competition may not have been great but the Grizzlies played their style of basketball and put together a nice string of wins to solidify themselves as a team.

Going into the season, I don’t think most Grizzlies fans would have said this was an acceptable outcome; I think the fanbase was mostly set on contending for a title this year again before the window theoretically closes on the Z-Bo/Tony Allen era in Memphis. I don’t think a low playoff seed this year necessarily means the end of that era—I just think it means the Grizzlies had a new coach and had injuries to deal with.

But there are two more possible outcomes of this season.

Outcome #3: The Grizzlies barely miss the playoffs and end up in the late lottery.

How long will it take to get Marc Gasol back in this form?

  • How long will it take to get Marc Gasol back in this form?

This is probably the (1) least interesting and (2) least helpful way for the season to end for the Grizzlies. If for some reason the Grizzlies can’t manage to stay at .500 with Marc Gasol out, or for some reason they can’t manage to do better than .500 with Gasol after he returns from his injury, this is probably what the Grizzlies will be looking at, though. It’s probably unfair that simply finishing .500 looks like it’ll be enough to guarantee home court advantage in the Eastern Conference and miss the playoffs in the Western Conference, but it is what it is. I don’t anticipate many of the teams above the Grizzlies to drop off dramatically—Dallas, maybe, and it does seem unusual for Portland to be in first place—and if they do, there are going to be more teams than just the Grizzlies waiting around to take advantage of it. The Lakers, Pelicans, and Suns may have their eyes on the future, but they all have good records right now (better than the Grizzlies) and the Timberwolves were picked to make the playoffs, too.

This outcome is the “nothing broke our way” outcome for the Grizzlies. If they suffer another major injury—if (and I can’t believe I’m even saying this out loud) Mike Conley tweaks his ankle and misses a week here, Z-Bo tweaks his ankle (again) and misses two weeks there—it’s not out of the realm of possibility that outcome #3 will be where the Grizzlies end up.

For some reason, the Grizzlies, under the previous management regime, managed not to trade their 2014 first round pick—though the 2nd rounder apparently got traded to the Cavaliers with Jeremy Pargo in return for D.J. Kennedy. The 2014 Draft is loaded, but is it loaded at the 10-15 spots, which is where the Grizzlies would be picking if they just barely miss the playoffs? I’m not enough of a draft expert to say. But, given the NBA’s race to the bottom this season to tank for Andrew Wiggins, Jabari Parker, and all of these other great college players that are supposedly coming in the 2014 draft class, if the Grizzlies get to the All Star break (or the trade deadline) and they’re dramatically below .500 for some reason, with no expectations of getting any better (or, especially, “better” enough to make the playoffs), there’s and outside chance for the fourth and final outcome…

Outcome #4: Blow the whole thing up and tank like crazy to get a good draft pick to add to the Marc Gasol/Mike Conley core.

If you’d told me in August that this would even be leaving my fingers and appearing on a computer screen in the first week of December, I’d ask if I’d somehow started writing for Liberty Ballers about the 76ers. But hear me out before you start cussing me out on Twitter and in the comments.

Obviously Zach Randolph’s contract situation is still Zach Randolph’s contract situation. With Marc Gasol out, Randolph’s importance to the Grizzlies’ ability to play well—or even keep up with the rest of the West while Gasol is on the mend—has increased substantially, and that has put a bit of a damper on the talk about “the Grizzlies might get rid of Z-Bo so he doesn’t pick up his player option.” But make no mistake: there are ways to make the numbers work, financially, to keep Zach Randolph in a Grizzlies uniform going forward, and there are certainly sound basketball reasons to keep Randolph in a Grizzlies uniform going forward, but that is by no means a done deal yet.

If the Grizzlies are, you know, ten games out of the 8th playoff spot and it’s close to the trade deadline, I wouldn’t be surpised to see all sorts of shakeups going on with the Grizzlies’ roster, whether that’s a move involving Randolph, flipping a young asset like Ed Davis (provided he can play well enough to become more of a trade asset) for another promising young player, or something else nuts that we haven’t even thought of yet, like the Grizzlies being the third or fourth team in some crazy deal by a tanking team looking to shed a good player who doesn’t help them get worse and/or younger in the short term (looking at you, Thad Young).

Right now this is crazy talk—this is all hypothetical—but do not kid yourself and say that there’s no way this fourth outcome could happen. There’s no guarantee that the Grizzlies are going to make the playoffs, especially before we know (1) exactly when Marc Gasol will return and (2) how long it’s going to take him to return to top form once he comes back. He wasn’t exactly playing at 100% Marc Gasol level before he injured his knee, remember? His conditioning was tenuous at best, “the paella and sangria on the beach diet” at worst.

It’s the crazy question that’s been nagging at the back of my head for a while now, a question that I asked Chris Herrington via Twitter message while watching the Grizzlies/Lakers game a while back:

What if this is who the Grizzlies are this year—a team that has to grind it out and fight with everything they’ve got to beat a mediocre Lakers team?

If that nagging voice is right, and things do go south in a hurry for the Grizzlies this year, outcome #4 is out there for the taking.

Conclusions

What do I think is most likely to happen with the Grizzlies season right now, 20% of the way through it? Outcome #2. Play .500 ball until Gasol returns, get everything together, scrap it out, end up a sixth or seventh seed.

What do I want for Memphis, my city, who loves this team like a little brother looks up to the big brother who beats everyone who picks on us to a pulp? I want an NBA title banner hanging in FedExForum. This year, and every year. I want to see “Randolph #50” and “Allen #9” and “Gasol #33” and “Conley #11” hanging from the rafters after a Spurs-like run of four titles in eight years.

But, Memphis, I just don’t see that outcome, no matter how hard I try to wish it into existence. I don’t think this year’s team is that team. And I don’t think last year’s team was that team, either, if I’m honest. Last year’s team might have been our ’96 Sonics or our ’98 Jazz or our 2010 Suns, a great team that just didn’t make it to the promised land. Those teams live forever, too, but not in the way that Memphis wants this Grizzlies team to. But I think we might be up against it a little bit here.

This is gut-check time for Grizzlies fans. What are you here for? If the Tigers get good again, which it looks like they might, are you still going to be at those Tuesday night games against crappy East teams with your Growl Towel, or will you hold off until April and buy your playoff tickets? Is Outcome #2 going to scare you away? What about Outcome #3? What about Outcome #4? These questions need to be asked and answered.

No matter which of these four things happens, there is one certain fact: there’s a lot of basketball left to play, and it’s going to be life-or-death some nights for the Grizzlies, and they’d better play like it.