Categories
Calling the Bluff Music

Throwback Thursday: DJ Zirk’s “Lock ‘Em N Da Trunk”

Screen_Shot_2014-10-30_at_11.05.57_AM.png

Hailing from Orange Mound, one of Memphis’ most historic and culturally rich communities, DJ Zirk took the city by storm when he dropped the bass-ridden track “Lock ’Em N Da Trunk.”

Although it was released to the masses nearly two decades ago, the Memphis classic continues to get played in whips, nightclubs, and at Jookin’ events.

Zirk recently collaborated with former rivals Three 6 Mafia Da Mafia 6ix to create “Lock’m N Da Trunk V.2.” The alternate version is on Da Mafia 6ix’s new Hear Sum Evil mixtape.

Peep Zirk’s original version of “Lock ’Em N Da Trunk” below.

Check out my website: ahumblesoul.com
Follow me on Twitter and friend me on Facebook

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

Ben Jones Chapter Says ‘No’ to Amendment 2

Constitutional Amendment 2 on the November 4 ballot, which deals with the process of appointing state appellate judge, is potentially as transformational as either Amendment 1 (regarding the abortion issue) or Amendment 3 (prohibiting a state income tax),  and it has received a good deal of attention, especially of late.

But most of the organized activity has been on the “yes” side of the issue, with numerous public officials and organizations, across the political spectrum, endorsing the amendment and campaigning for it publicly. In brief, Amednment 2 allows for gubernatorial appointment of appellate judges, as at present, but eliminates the current Tennessee Plan’s front-end advisory commission while adding a de facto legislative veto power.

Organized campaign activity against the amendment has been rare, but on Thursday at least one legal body came forth in opposition to Amendment 2.

This was the Ben F. Jones chapter of the National Bar Association, a predominantly African-American group, which expressed itself this way in a public release:

The Ben F. Jones Chapter of the National Bar Association believes that Tennesseans should vote “NO” on Amendment 2, which is on the November 4th, 2014 ballot. The amendment, titled “Tennessee Judicial Selection, Amendment 2” empowers the General Assembly to confirm or reject the governor’s nominations to fill vacancies on the state’s appellate benches, without any input from the public. This is a major change from the utilization of the Judicial Nominating Commission or the current Governor’s Commission for Judicial Appointments, which both allowed and welcomed public input. On its face, the measure appears to be a relatively harmless procedural codification of the arguably ambiguous introductory language of Section 3, Article VI of the Constitution of the State of Tennessee that currently reads, “The judges of the Supreme Court shall be elected by the qualified voters of the state.” It is anything but. This amendment usurps the power of the people of the state to select our judiciary and bestows it entirely upon the Governor and the General Assembly, narrowing the fundamental concept of democracy and eroding the separation of powers.

Although some have compared the proposed judicial process to the federal model, there is a big distinction. The plain language of the Tennessee amendment requires confirmation by both houses of the General Assembly, not just the Senate as is required for federal judicial confirmation. And even with the required approval of one body, the federal process is far from flawless. Judicial appointments in the federal government have reached an historic level of inefficiency according to the National Women’s Law Center. Arming both chambers of the state legislature with veto power over the Governor’s judicial appointment authority could have an even more dramatic effect on judicial efficiency here in Tennessee.

Although proponents of Amendment 2 assert that it keeps politics and big money out of the judicial selection process, it is doubtful that this will be the overall outcome. Delegating the power of appointment to politicians hardly cleanses the process of politics, and political spending will simply be redirected.

It is our view that relinquishing elective power to a partisan legislature does not expand democracy, but contracts it. Without a compelling rationale as to why such radical change is necessary, it is difficult to justify support of the amendment. It is for these reasons that the Ben F. Jones Chapter of the National Bar Association urges Tennesseans to Vote “No” on Amendment 2. 

Categories
Beyond the Arc Sports

Next Day Notes: Grizzlies 105, Timberwolves 101

Larry Kuzniewski

This happened often last night, and it rarely ended well for Thaddeus Young.

Last night, the improbable happened: the Grizzlies won their season opener for the first time since the franchise moved to Memphis. No one with the team who wasn’t in Vancouver has ever seen them win on the first night of the season. That unlikeliest of streaks was broken last night.

And, of course, it was broken in true Grizzlies fashion: behind a huge night from Marc Gasol (32 points and 9 rebounds) and a dominant performance from Zach Randolph (25 points and 13 rebounds). Gasol shot 70% from the floor, and Randolph shot 75%. No one on the Wolves (with the exception of maybe Gorgui Dieng) could do anything to stop either one of the Grizzlies’ bigs, not even this:

The dominance of Gasol and Randolph overshadowed some negative things (which, of course, I’ll get into below) but overall, a win is a win, and this one set a tone. In the locker room after the game, the players seemed to know they were lucky to close out the game, given how poorly the bench unit played and how badly they were out-rebounded. One got a sense that they were more relieved they didn’t lose than happy that they won, and that’s as it should be—there was a lot to work on. I’m sure the next film session will involve some curse words.

[jump]

The Timberwolves are in an odd spot this season, too. Without Kevin Love, and having added Thaddeus Young, Andrew Wiggins, and Anthony Bennett, they’ve got a group of very talented young(ish) players and a new coach (Flip Saunders, not Dave Joerger, thought that was apparently this close to becoming a reality) from which they can rebuild into a better team, one that can get over the playoff hump in the ever-competitive West the way a Love-led team never could. They may not be good this year, but they have all the pieces they need. It’s up to them.

Last night was also 1st overall pick Andrew Wiggins’ first real NBA game. Wiggins, who is from Toronto, had to play against Vince Carter, who he’s publicly cited as an inspiration to him growing up. That had to have been weird. Carter made it a point to introduce himself to Wiggins before the game, saying he spoke to Wiggins before Wiggins spoke to him because “I wanted it to be a little awkward for him” before telling Wiggins to call him if he needed any advice (which, I thought, says a lot about Carter). The other thing that was probably a little awkward for Wiggins was going 2–5 from the field for 6 points in 18 minutes, but… he’ll get better. Playing starter minutes in his first-ever real NBA game isn’t exactly the easiest adjustment to make.

Three Things I Liked

Gasol and Z-Bo’s dominant performance. Like I said, the Wolves had no answer for the new-look Marc Gasol and the old-look Zach Randolph. Early on, Randolph was matched up against Thad Young, and neither one of them could guard the other, both guys trading buckets. Gasol, on the other hand, had an easier time with the ever-intimidating Nikola Pekovic, who is generally a good player, but just didn’t have the moves to make anything happen against Gasol on either end. Gorgui Dieng was able to slow down the Grizzlies’ interior scoring while he was in the game, but he hurt his thumb and didn’t play too much after that, and so the onslaught continued.

Gasol playing the way he played opens the game up so much for Randolph. When defenses can’t spend all night packing the paint against Randolph, he’s more effective, and when they do collapse on him—like that picture above of Randolph being quadruple-teamed—there’s always an open shot available somewhere, either from Gasol at the elbow, someone (Mike Conley in this case) at the 3-point line, or somewhere. Having two big men scoring like that makes the Grizzlies a different, much more dangerous team.

Mike Conley looks good. Conley’s stat line wasn’t anything more impressive than normal—16 points, 6 assists, only one rebound—but he looked like Mike Conley, getting into the lane and making things happen, taking open shots, hounding on defense, doing the Mike Conley things that got him so close to being an All Star last season. As Conley goes, so go the Grizzlies, so… this is good.

Vince Carter in crunch time. He may not be able to run yet, and he may have only been out there for a few seconds, but it was long enough for him to get a superstar call when he wasn’t really fouled, something that rarely (if ever) happens to any other Griz player. As Carter heals up (knock on wood) and starts to integrate into the offense better, Crunch Time Carter™ will only become more effective, and that’s a good thing for the Griz. A guy like that—basically a release valve for the offense in case whatever is happening breaks down—is priceless in close game situations.

Three Things I Didn’t Like

Rebounding There wasn’t any. Gasol and Randolph did their part, but no one else did much of anything on the glass against the Wolves. The Grizzlies got out-rebounded 47–33, and that makes it seem closer than it was… Minnesota got 19 offensive rebounds (45.2% offensive rebounding rate, meaning they grabbed an estimated 45% of the available offensive rebounds) to the Grizzlies’ 10 (for an ORB% of 26.3, which is… significantly less than 45).

If the Grizzlies’ players who aren’t Gasol and Z-Bo can’t figure out how to rebound better than that, the Griz will lose some games to teams better than Minnesota. It was the first game of the year, so we have no reason to believe they won’t improve, so I’m not particularly worried about it. Yet.

The bench without Calathes. I know Beno Udrih is great on Twitter, and I know he sank some jumpers in the playoffs that really helped the Griz out, but let’s be real for a second: Nick Calathes is a better point guard. Calathes is a better passer, a much better defender, and has a much better feel for running an offense than Udrih, and it shows. Besides that, the bench guys—Koufos, Leuer, et al—are used to playing with him, used to his passes, used to his probing, drive-and-kick style. With Beno Udrih as the backup point while Calathes is serving his suspension, the bench unit couldn’t play as cohesively, and that’s just something that’s going to happen until Calathes returns. 12 more games.

Jon Leuer. Leuer seemed like he was playing well overall last night, but he ended up going 0–4 on some great looks at the basket, only grabbed 3 rebounds, and generally just didn’t contribute very much. Some of that is the aforementioned comfort level with Calathes, some of that was probably first-game jitters, but… Leuer has to contribute if he’s going to hang on to that backup power forward spot. Jarnell Stokes is gunning for him, and Tayshaun Prince is hungry for minutes too, and if Leuer doesn’t work out, there’s definitely going to be someone else who will play in his place. I don’t think it’s a big deal yet—again, Game 1—but it’s worth keeping an eye on Leuer to see if he can really hang in there and contribute.

Tweet of the Night

Y’all should be following @mattyp90. Apparently he’s making Marc Gasol GIFs this season.

Up Next

A road back-to-back Friday and Saturday against the Pacers and HornBobNetCats, and then back home on Monday to face off against Anthony Davis and the (frankly pretty scary) New Orleans Pelicans.

Categories
Sports Tiger Blue

“American” Football Picks: Week 10

Last Week: 4-0
Season: 47-13

AAC_logo.jpg

FRIDAY
Tulsa at Memphis
Cincinnati at Tulane

SATURDAY
UCF at UConn
Houston at USF
East Carolina at Temple

Categories
Letter From The Editor Opinion

The Ebola “Crisis” Isn’t.

“He sounds kinda gay,” I said to my art director.

It was 1985. I was a young magazine editor living in Pittsburgh. I’d just gotten off the phone with a freelance writer who I’d agreed to meet for lunch. I was a liberal-thinking sort of fellow. I had no problem with gay people, though I didn’t know many back then.

“Lewis” and I had agreed to meet at a small restaurant near my office. It was a quiet place, perfect for conversation. I got there first.

Five minutes later, the front door burst open and a tall, thin, animated man came in and surveyed the room. He was wearing a beret and a long black coat. Around his neck was a six-foot-long scarf of many colors. He spotted me across the room and began to work his way through tables of diners, tossing his scarf over his shoulder as he approached. “THERE YOU ARE!” he boomed. “I’m SORRY I’m late! I’ve been running NIPPLES TO THE WIND all day, and I just can’t seem to catch up.” Heads turned, eyes rolled.

It was a hell of an entrance, and it led to a great friendship. I thought about Lewis again this week, as I read the latest fear-mongering news reports about the Ebola “epidemic.” Through my friendship with Lewis, I saw the horrific effects — second-hand, admittedly — of a real epidemic: AIDS. And there is no comparison.

In the 1980s, getting AIDS was a death sentence. And we had a president who didn’t even utter the name of the disease until five years after it had killed tens of thousands of Americans. I watched Lewis undergo the terrifying ritual of getting “the test,” going to the doctor to find out if he would live or die. He was negative, thankfully, but many of his friends were not. Most of them didn’t live more than a year or so. It was a dark and scary time.

Children who were HIV positive were turned away from school. Doctors who treated AIDS patients were shunned. Gay men were treated as pariahs. It took years for Americans to learn to deal with the epidemic in a rational manner. In the U.S. alone, 636,000 people have died from AIDS. World-wide, the death toll is 37 million, and the disease continues to kill. That’s an epidemic.

Ebola is a horrific disease with a 30 percent survival rate. It is ravaging three African countries with sub-standard medical and health facilities. We should be doing all we can to help stop the spread of the disease. But medical experts in the U.S. have assured us repeatedly that we are in no danger of an epidemic here. There have been four cases in the U.S. One person has died. Can we stop with the absurd over-reaction, please?

And can we please stop using the Ebola “crisis” for political gain? (Actually, I suspect much of the furor about Ebola will subside after the November 4th election. Which is a sad commentary, indeed, on the state of our electoral process.)

Yes, Ebola is scary, but we need to get a grip. Those of us of a certain age can remember what a real epidemic looks like. And this ain’t it. Not even close.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Election Year 2015 is Upon Us

Even as time was running out on the elections of 2014, with early voting ending this week in the election process that ends Tuesday, November 4th, the stirrings of Election Year 2015 were at hand. 

Among those in attendance at a Monday morning rally for Democratic candidates at the IBEW building on Madison were Kenneth Whalum and his wife Sheila. And while neither was quite ready to commit to a candidacy for Memphis mayor by the New Olivet Baptist Church pastor and former school board member, both seemed to relish the thought of a follow-up race to the Rev. Whalum’s surprisingly close second-place finish to Deidre Malone in last May’s Democratic primary for Shelby County mayor.

“Maybe it’s time for another tour of India,” joked the reverend, who had been absent on that East Asian sub-continent for a prolonged period just before election day but who finished strong, a fact indicating either that 1) absence made the hearts of voters grow fonder; or that 2) a more vigorous late effort on Shelby County soil might have put him over.

Either scenario, coupled with the fact that his appeal of a 2012 school board race narrowly lost to Kevin Woods had been finally disallowed by the courts, clearly left the irrepressible Whalum available for combat.

Who else is thinking about it? The proper question might be: Who isn’t?

Also present at the IBEW rally was former Shelby County Commission Chairman James Harvey, who is already committed to a race for Memphis mayor to the point of passing out calling cards advertising the fact.

“Changing parties again?” a passer-by jested to Harvey, a nominal Democrat who, in the past year or so on the commission, often made common cause with the body’s Republicans.

“I need ’em now!” responded Harvey, good-naturedly, about his attendance with other Democrats at the IBEW rally, which featured Gordon Ball, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senator, at the climax of his statewide “No Show Lamar” bus tour; District 30 state Senate candidate Sara Kyle; and District 96 state House of Representatives candidate Dwayne Thompson.

Not so sunny was another attendee, Memphis City Councilman Myron Lowery, who, when asked if he was considering another mayoral race (he ran unsuccessfully in the special election of 2009 while serving as interim city mayor) answered calmly, “No,” but became non-committal, to the point of truculence, at the follow-up question, “So, are you closing the door?”

Lowery has confided to acquaintances, however, that he is indeed once again measuring the prospect of a mayoral race, while simultaneously contemplating a race by his son, management consultant Mickell Lowery, for his council seat should he choose to vacate it.

Another council member, Harold Collins, has formed an exploratory committee and is contemplating a mayoral race based largely on the theme that the current administration of Mayor A C Wharton is acting insufficiently in a number of spheres, including those of dealing with employee benefits and coping with recent outbreaks of mob violence.

Another councilman considered likely to make a bid for mayor is current council Chairman Jim Strickland, who has built up a decently sized following over the years by dint of his highly public crusades for budgetary reform. He, too, has often been critical of the incumbent mayor.

In accordance with assurances, public and private, he has made over the past year, Wharton himself is still considered to be a candidate for reelection, though there are those who speculate he may have second thoughts, given his advancing years and the increasing gravity of fiscal and social problems confronting the city.

The mayor’s supporters tend to pooh-pooh such speculation and suggest that only Wharton is capable of achieving across-the-boards support from the city’s various demographic components.

Others known or thought to be considering a mayoral race are former state legislator and ex-councilmember Carol Chumney (who has run twice previously); current county Commissioner Steve Basar; and Memphis Police Association President Mike Williams.

The list of potential mayoral candidates is a roster that may grow larger quickly.

• In introducing Ball at the IBEW rally, state Democratic Chairman Roy Herron contended that incumbent Republican Senator Lamar Alexander‘s poll numbers were “going down and down and down and Gordon Ball’s are going up and up and up, and those lines are going to intersect.”

In his own remarks, Ball charged that “my opponent has spent millions of dollars trying to smear and discredit us” and cited that as evidence of how seriously Alexander was taking the threat to his reelection.

The Democratic nominee spent considerable time addressing the recent publicity about a suit brought against him by one Barry Kraselsky, an Alabama resident who recently purchased a Florida condo from Ball and is accusing Ball and his wife, Happy, of having “duped” him by removing items from the property.

Ball said he was being sued for $5,300, even though he had posted an escrow account of $5,000, which was available to Kraselsky, whom he said was a “charlatan” and a major Republican donor. “We’re going to take care of him after November 4th.”

In remarks to reporters after his formal speech, Ball, who opposes the proposed Common Core educational standards, contended that Alexander, who has mainly been opaque on the subject, was a supporter of Common Core, which is opposed by many classroom teachers. Ball noted that Alexander had bragged on well-known teachers’ advocate Diane Ravitch, who is now a Common Core opponent, in Lamar Alexander’s Little Plaid Book, which the senator published years ago.

“He doesn’t mention her anymore,” said Ball. “He and [state Education Commissioner] Kevin Huffman and [educational reformer and Common Core supporter] Michelle Rhee are in this together.”

Also taking part in the IBEW rally were Whalum and Ashley Coffield, CEO of Memphis Planned Parenthood, who passed out to all the candidates T-shirts opposing Constitutional Amendment 1 on the November 4th ballot. Amendment 1 would in effect nullify a 2000 decision by the state Supreme Court that granted more protection to abortion rights than have the federal courts, as well as empower the General Assembly to legislate on a variety of potential new restrictions to abortion.

• The Shelby County Commission, which was unable on Monday to come to a decision on proposed changes in County Mayor Mark Luttrell‘s amended health-care plan for county employees (see this week’s Editorial) also was somewhat riven on another – more explicitly political – issue.

This was a suit filed by seven commissioners in Chancery Court against current Chairman Justin Ford challenging his right to arbitrarily keep items off the body’s agenda.

The plaintiffs are the commission’s six Democrats and one Republican, former vice Chairman Steve Basar, who previously voted with the Democrats to stall the committee appointments by Ford, who was elected in this fall’s first organizational session by a combination of his own vote with that of the commission’s five Republicans. As the GOP’s Heidi Shafer explained at the time, the outnumbered Republicans had a choice between Ford, who has fairly consistently voted their way in previous years, and Bailey, who rarely has.

Basar was aggrieved by having been denied votes for the chairmanship, which he believed himself to be in line for, by most of his Republican colleagues.

Subsequent attempts to place items on the commission agenda proposing rules changes that would threaten Ford’s authority have been arbitrarily removed by the chairman.

Categories
News The Fly-By

Fly on the Wall 1340

(F)art Jokes

This new mural painted on the side of Brian’s Grocery in Uptown was created with a grant from Wells Fargo. It celebrates the astonishing level of diversity that exists in Memphis by depicting an adorable one-legged alien couple from the Monopodia Star System. They are happy together inside the glow of their protective force-field, safe from natural terrors of the urban core, like giant interdimensional beings from Planet Yellow.

Neverending Elvis

It seems unlikely that Elvis Presley will ever reclaim his position atop the dead celebrity money-making charts. According to Reuters, the zombie King of Rock remains in second place, earning just under $55 million, well behind undead Pop King Michael Jackson who took in a posthumous $140 million.

Savage Lovers

Memphis playwright/filmmaker Morgan Jon Fox received some exposure in Seattle last week when Savage Love sex columnist/media personality Dan Savage linked a video of Fox’s play Ann Coulter and Dan Savage In an Elevator On Its Way to Hell on his Slog Blog under the headline “Offered Without Comment.” Savage did have one criticism though: “I don’t wear collared shirts on CNN. Or anywhere else.” Except for on MSNBC, apparently.

Categories
News The Fly-By

U of M May Raise Minimum Wage to $10.10 Per Hour

After working as a custodian at the University of Memphis for eight years, 61-year-old Thelma Rimmer only makes $8.94 an hour.

“I can hardly make it,” Rimmer said. “I’ve been up there eight years. I guess they’ve given me a dollar a year. When I first started, I was making $7.25. There are people who’ve been there 20 years that are not even making $10 an hour. Most people there have to work two or three jobs [to maintain a living].”

Rimmer is one of approximately 110 workers at the U of M who could receive a pay raise if the Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR) approves the university’s proposal to raise its hourly wage to $10.10 for regular, benefits-eligible employees.

The proposal will be considered at TBR’s December board meeting. If approved, the increase would be implemented in January 2015. It would mainly impact custodial workers, grounds workers, parking assistants, and clerks.

Thelma Rimmer

According to the U of M, the lowest minimum wage for employees in benefits-eligible positions is $8.75 per hour. Currently, the lowest wage paid for that position at the university is $8.88 per hour.

U of M president M. David Rudd said he’s been determined to raise salaries for the university’s lowest paid workers since being appointed in May.

“We value our employees and believe that raising the salaries of our lowest paid employees is the right thing to do,” Rudd said. “We have been working towards this for several years, and our human resources department identified initiatives that created sufficient savings to make this increase possible. It’s a critical issue for the University of Memphis and certainly one of our priorities.”

The fight to raise minimum wages for employees in benefits-eligible positions at the U of M has been ongoing since 2010. The United Campus Workers (UCW), of which Rimmer is vice president, has been on the frontline in the fight. The organization has been pushing to secure better wages for benefits-eligible employees at all state-based institutions.

The UCW has had moderate success with its movement. In 2013, the University of Tennessee at Knoxville raised minimum wages for campus workers to $9.50 in response to the UCW’s campaign.

Tom Anderson, president of the UCW, said although the ultimate goal is a living wage of $15 per hour for all low-paid campus workers, increasing minimum wages to $10.10 is a great start in compensating employees fairly for their labor.

Anderson said the increase could “mean an economic boom for Memphis.”

“Even when you get beyond the initial impact of taking home more money, it means increased stability for people [and] increased buying power,” Anderson said. “And all the people this would affect spend money in the community, so it supports local businesses [and] the city of Memphis, whether it’s house payments or rent or just groceries or getting your car fixed.”

Rimmer said she and her colleagues would appreciate a raise to $10.10 an hour, but they still desire an income that allows them to avoid living paycheck-to-paycheck.

“People have families. They want to be able to have a house, a car, take their kids out and let them go do things,” Rimmer said. “What do you think the common laborer should make? I think $15 per hour would be just fine. For a person to work 22 years, you don’t think they deserve at least $15 to retire? There are a lot of folks at the university that have retired on minimum wage.”

Categories
News The Fly-By

New Fund Established to Help Test City’s Rape Kits

Testing the thousands of backlogged rape kits that surfaced in Memphis last year is estimated to cost more than $6.5 million, and officials said this month that more than $3.7 million is still needed to reach that goal. 

The Memphis Police Department (MPD) and the Shelby County Sheriff’s Office (SCSO) have funded the effort so far through direct support from the Memphis City Council, grants from the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and a $750,000 challenge grant from the Plough Foundation that will be issued once the funding gap is closed.

But a curious new source of funds has emerged. A private, anonymous donor gave $10,000 to the effort this month. The anonymous donor parked those funds at the Community Foundation of Greater Memphis (CFGM). In doing so, the donor established the Sexual Assault Resource Fund, which is now open to anyone looking to help clear the rape kit backlog. 

“I think it’s really going to fill the gap,” said Sutton Mora Hayes, vice president of the CFGM. “It will help get additional testing that needs to be done, but it will also help the organizations that work with victims. It will help [the organizations] with training and capacity building.”

Hayes said, for example, the fund could be used to support hiring more victims’ counselors at the Shelby County Rape Crisis Center. Or it could be used, she said, for technical assistance, policy work, training law enforcement, or just processing more rape kits. The final decision on how the funds are used is up to a panel comprised of members from the Cross-Functional Team, which oversees the rape kit testing project.

Funds like this are not unusual to the CFGM, Hayes said. The foundation has worked with the city and county on several projects in the past, including the purchase of the land for the Shelby Farms Greenline. 

In related news, construction is set to begin next month on a new building to store rape kits and all DNA evidence for the MPD and the SCSO. 

Rape kits have been moved over the years from the old MPD headquarters at 128 Adams, to 201 Poplar, and then to the MPD’s property and evidence storage facility in the old International Harvester building. These moves were part of the confusion that led to the rape kit backlog.

The new space will be built at the Harvester location with the capacity to store about 60,000 kits. The facility will be climate-controlled and come with a price tag of about $1 million. Construction is estimated to take about four months.

Progress is being made in the situation with 222 investigations launched since the untested rape kits surfaced in May 2013. But fixing the problem will be anything but quick or cheap in the long run.  

Testing all of the kits could take up to five years, according to a report from the Cross-Functional Team. The one-time glut of cases into the system has created a glut of work for law enforcement and prosecutors. Both will need more employees (and more money to pay them) to conclude the project.

Rape kit backlog by the numbers:

• 12,374 total rape kits discovered 

• 6,722 not yet tested

• Nearly 5,000 of those kits collected before DNA testing existed

• 2,495 now being tested, majority at a private lab

• 222 investigations initiated based on testing

• 90 investigations remain active

• 132 investigations have been closed

• 20 individuals identified as being previously convicted

• 34 indictments issued

• 14 of those are suspects based on hits from the FBI’s Combined DNA Index (CODIS) System

• 20 suspects remain as John Doe, not identified

• 18 cases closed because victim or suspect has died

• 21 cases closed because victims have been contacted but did not want to participate in a further investigation

• 27 cases not caught before the statute of limitations expired

• 3 cases investigated did not meet the statute definitions of a crime

Categories
News The Fly-By

Sierra Club Proposed Alternatives to Shelby Farms Parkway

Each weekday, rush hour traffic backs up along Walnut Grove and Farm Road inside Shelby Farms Park, turning part of the city’s largest urban green space into a busy and congested thoroughfare.

The proposed $38 million Shelby Farms Parkway, which is currently under review by the Federal Highway Administration, would divert that traffic around the western edge of the park. But members of the local Sierra Club Chickasaw Group say they have a simpler solution that would save the city millions of dollars and solve traffic problems sooner.

The Sierra Club opposes the Shelby Farms Parkway plan because they believe it takes away too much park land and feels too much like an interstate.

Last week, the Sierra Club held a series of public rallies near Shelby Farms to bring some awareness to the alternatives, which were first proposed by national traffic engineering consultant Walter Kulash of the Center for Humans and Nature in Chicago. Kulash was invited to Memphis last year by the Sierra Club to study alternatives to Shelby Farms Parkway.

Courtesy of Sierra Club

Right: Farm Road with right turn lane added

Those alternatives include: 1) building a longer left turning lane onto Farm Road from eastbound Walnut Grove, 2) building a longer left turning lane for southbound Farm Road traffic turning onto Mullins Station or adding a right turning lane, 3) creating a westbound auxiliary lane from Farm Road to Humphries, 4) extending the northbound merging lane from Farm Road to Walnut Grove, and 5) making adjustments to signal timing.

“When you are headed east on Walnut Grove and you get to Farm Road, that left turn lane is not long enough. It doesn’t hold enough cars, so cars end up waiting to turn left in a lane that should be a travel lane,” said Dennis Lynch, transportation chair for the state and local Sierra Club.

City engineer John Cameron said the Sierra Club’s proposals may provide some short-term relief but that they would only be a “Band-Aid for the situation.” He says traffic counts through the area will rise in the future and that the larger Shelby Farms Parkway project will be needed.

“If the parkway project moves forward, we don’t want to put a whole lot of money into Farm Road. What the Sierra Club is proposing would cost between a half-million and a million dollars just to turn around three to five years later and take it all out,” Cameron said.

Under the Shelby Farms Parkway plan, Farm Road, will be closed to through traffic and used as a pedestrian route. The Memphis City Council delayed a funding match for the parkway plan earlier this year, but Cameron said they’ll be seeking funding from the council again next year. Cameron said the parkway could be fully constructed in three to five years.

Laura Morris, executive director for the Shelby Farms Park Conservancy, said the conservancy is backing the most recent parkway design, which wraps the new road around the western edge of the park. Morris says it does not “damage the park and also relieves traffic.” Morris said she doesn’t oppose the Sierra Club’s ideas, but she doesn’t believe they’ll solve congestion in the future.

“We don’t disagree that temporary fixes like this could relieve some of the pressure right now, but we know that won’t be enough,” Morris said. “It might fix today’s problems but only by a small measure.”

Lynch doesn’t agree.

“We don’t think the parkway is needed and anything that can be done to keep it from being built is a good thing,” Lynch said. “I calculated that the cost to the people stuck in congestion. The value of their time plus the extra gasoline they’re using over five to six years comes to $32 million to $58 million. But it would only cost the city $1 million to make the improvements.”