Categories
Editorial Opinion

Silver Lining

Ordinarily, we don’t address the same subject in this space for two weeks running, but there are exceptions, once in a while. Last week, you may recall, we wrote about the Memphis Zoo board’s economic impact study, vis-a-vis Greensward parking at Overton Park. We dealt briefly (and by no means definitively) with both the study and the reaction of critics who distrusted its conclusions that Greensward parking was not necessarily a bad thing.

The subject (which shows no signs of going away, in any case) reared itself again this week in remarks to a Rotary Club of Memphis luncheon at the University Club by former city councilman Shea Flinn, now senior vice president of the Greater Memphis Area Chamber of Commerce and, as described by chamber chair Carolyn Hardy, the man who “moves the needle” on economic opportunity incentives pushed by the chamber.

Flinn oversees the Chairman’s Circle, a public outreach group operated by the chamber, as well as a series of innovative projects he refers to as “moon missions.”

His approach to the Greensward question was somewhat inadvertent and came his way during the post-address question-and-answer period, via an audience query regarding one of the aforesaid moon missions, this one designated as “Advancing Green Space.” Flinn was asked to comment on that mission in light of the current Greensward controversy.

Flinn made it clear that a) he was not advancing an official chamber position; and b) he was not bursting at the seams with an urge to speak on the matter as a private citizen. In keeping with that caution, Flinn’s first response was to express optimism that, as a result of ongoing mediation efforts initiated by Mayor Jim Strickland, there would soon be found “an adequate solution” to the controversy. He then went further, suggesting that there was an obvious silver lining to the whole wrangle, “if we could step back from the passion and Facebook of it all.”

Flinn reminded his audience that, “20 years ago we actually celebrated the fact of zoo parking.” It was because, he added, at that time the Memphis Zoo and Overton Park had each lost much of their luster and were not attracting nearly as many local citizens and tourists.

What he was saying, in effect, was that there is a problem today only because both the zoo and the park have been upgraded to the point that there is green space worth fighting over.

Well, that’s one way to look at it.

We were struck by several of Flinn’s observations, including his warning that “the best intentions” do not necessarily lead to “the best process.” In any case, said Flinn, it would be “a mistake to see ‘green space’ as meaning only Overton Park.”

Regrettably, however, that is the one green space that most clearly needs to be protected, however the process unfolds.

Categories
Opinion The Last Word

You Can’t Gift Me; I’m Already Gifted.

There’s an episode of 30 Rock where Jack talks about how his product integration sets a new standard in upward revenue-stream dynamics. It’s word salad, but yet somehow you get the drift, don’t you? It’s a saddle of charred corporate buzzword garnished with a foam of pretentiousness and a coulis of self-importance. We all know someone who talks like this. Usually it’s someone who makes a big deal of telling you he went to the Wharton School and that he works hard to play hard. He’s also been known to pound a few Bud Heavies because he is That Guy. He’s Buzzword Guy.

Every few years, I like to take stock of some of the stupidest corporate buzzwords. Wait. I say that like there are some buzzwords that aren’t stupid. Ahem. Every few years I like to sit back and make fun of some of the stupidest of the stupid buzzwords out there. I try not to do it any more than that because then all this column would become is me ranting about why you can’t just call someone. Why do you have to “reach out”? Are you a member of the Four Tops? Doubtful. My husband already hears me complain about people “gifting” each other, and I don’t think he wants to read about it too.

Alec Baldwin, 30 Rock’s Jack

One of my several side gigs is as a researcher. I get a lot of really interesting questions, but I’ve noticed recently I’ve gotten a lot of questions involving “industry disruption.” What are disruptive trends in software as a service? Who are the top merchant services aggregator disrupters? How is the pet industry being disrupted?

I want to start every answer with, dude. First? Just because you have some innovation or some startup with a stupid name doesn’t mean you’re disruptive. Or, wait, maybe it does because I’m not entirely sure what it means to be disruptive anymore. I thought it meant an innovation that changes an industry. Netflix was a disrupter to the video-rental industry even though it wasn’t immediately successful. Now it’s being used for any new rowdy startup wanting to change the game. Uber isn’t disrupting the taxi industry, according to Clayton Christensen, who coined “disruption” in 1995, and he’s a mite pissed off that you youngsters are corrupting his buzzword. Get off his lawn!

I’ve been gnashing my teeth over “ecosystem” applied to business for a few years. It replaced “global,” I think. A company can have an ecosystem when it comes to culture, but Apple has an ecosystem when it comes to devices. If you ask me to “circle back,” I will. But only long enough to pop your jaw. Are you a “wantrepreneur” interested in amplifying insight-as-a-service or “recrutainment”? Well, then you totally need OTTS (over the top service) because you have to look at your ROR (return on relationship) to really max your influencer marketing.

Normal people do this crap too. It isn’t just media mavens. I was talking to my very dear friend of 30 years about underwear. I bought TEN NEW PAIRS OF DRAWERS ALL AT ONCE! I was so excited. I mean, I’m in my 40s, so I’ve already been through the excitement of discovering a new band or finding out you won’t need antibiotics for that thing. New underwear is a Very. Big. Deal. So I said to her, why is it we ever thought getting underwear was the worst gift ever? It’s awesome! And she, lovely woman she is, replied with, “Who gifted you underwear?”

We were on the phone, so she couldn’t see the look I was giving her, but she heard it. Oh, she heard it. She knows how I feel about being gifted. Being gifted means you can play a piece of music after hearing it only one time or that you can do long division in your head without using your fingers. Gifting makes it all about you. It takes the giver out of the equation. Plus it just sounds stupid.

Mommy bloggers in Utah are always talking about being gifted. They’re usually gifted an old chair and some PVC pipe that they turn into a 16-piece “Anthro knockoff” dinner set. I’m not sure what it is ladies in Utah see in Anthropologie that the rest of the country doesn’t. I mean, here in Tennessee, we love a good wacky Anthropologie cardboard deer head as much as they do in Atlanta, but dang. Utah lady bloggers devote entire websites to knocking off the “Anthro look.” But I digress.

Core competency, swim lane, buy-in, deep dive, downstream, and what I might hate even more than disruption: biased algorithms. Incentivize your team! Future-proof your alpha deployment! Grow your playing field organically! Want to dialog your consumer space? Do it without me, because I have no idea what that means.

Susan Wilson writes for yeahandanotherthing.com and likethedew.com. She and her husband Chuck have lived here long enough to know that Midtown does not start at Highland.

Categories
Memphis Gaydar News

Tennessee Suing Obama Administration Over Transgender School Guidance

Herbert Slatery

Tennessee will join 10 other states in a lawsuit suing President Barack Obama’s administration over its directive regarding transgender student bathroom access in public schools.

Earlier this month, Obama issued guidance to public schools suggesting that transgender students should be allowed to use the restroom and locker rooms that match their gender identity. Governor Bill Haslam has criticized the directive and accused Obama of “over-reaching.” 

On Wednesday, 11 states — Tennessee, Texas, Oklahoma, Alabama, Wisconsin, West Virginia, Maine, Arizona, Louisiana, Utah, and Georgia — filed a lawsuit in a North Texas federal court declaring the directive to be unlawful.

The suit states that Obama has “conspired to turn workplace and educational settings across the country into laboratories for a massive social experiment, flouting the democratic process, and running roughshod over commonsense policies protecting children and basic privacy rights.”

Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery released the following statement on Wednesday afternoon:

The Executive Branch has taken what should be a state and local issue [under the Tenth Amendment] and made it a federal issue. Schools that do not conform under the new rules risk losing their federal funding. This is yet another instance of the Executive Branch changing law on a grand scale, which is not its constitutional role. Congress legislates, not the Executive Branch. Our Office has consistently opposed efforts like this to take away states’ rights and exclude the people’s representatives from making these decisions, or at a minimum being able to engage in a notice and comment period under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). As the complaint describes, it is a social experiment implemented by federal departments denying basic privacy rights and placing the burden largely on our children, not adults. Sitting on the sidelines on this issue was not an option.

Meanwhile, Shelby County Schools has said they’re carefully reviewing the information Obama sent to school districts, and they’ll continue to work with families of transgender students on a case-by-case basis.

Categories
News News Blog

Holt on Camera Traffic Tickets: ‘Burn Them’

Andy Holt

“My suggestion is this right here.”

Then, during a Facebook Live video Wednesday afternoon, Tennessee state Rep. Andy Holt produced a cigarette lighter and burned a traffic citation produced from a traffic camera.

The Dresden Republican has long been at odds with cities that issue traffic citations from traffic cameras and also the companies that make the products.

Holt sought to ban the cameras in the 2015 legislative session, though that bill was defeated. In 2016, he passed a law that camera companies must now state on their tickets that non-payment cannot effect a driver’s credit score, insurance rates, or driver’s license.

With that, Holt took to Facebook Wednesday to give his suggestion of what Tennessee drivers should do if they get those traffic tickets — burn them (or throw them away).

“That’s kind of what I think about theses items and what I think everyone should do when you receive one,” Holt said during the video as he held a flaming traffic citation, noting that the action is “my personal opinion.”

Holt said the citations aren’t real and they aren’t enforceable. Real tickets, he said, are given “by an officer of the law” and a “criminal penalty.

In a long news release, issued Wednesday Holt said cities that issue the camera citations are violating state law.  In many cases, he said, the camera companies (not police) determine if a law has been broken. He notes, though, that the companies will say they get final approval of their citations from law enforcement, “however, that’s not happening.”

With that and his new law in hand, Holt said the tickets are un-enforceable.

“The only power these camera companies have are their coercive words and things they want to intimidate you with,” Holt said. 

Categories
News News Blog

Pets of the Week

Each week, the Flyer will feature adoptable dogs and cats from Memphis Animal Services. All photos are credited to Memphis Pets Alive. More pictures can be found on the Memphis Pets Alive Facebook page.


[slideshow-1]

Categories
Film/TV Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Inside Videodrome

So, you ask, what’s all this internetting doing to me, anyway? You’re not alone in questioning the effects of advanced communications tech on the human brain that evolved basically to find food and a mate and create strategies to the get the food and have sex. But you may be surprised to learn that one of the most potent explorations of the question of our relationship to technology was made in 1983. 

James Woods gets personal with his new device in Videodrome.

When he created VIdeodrome, director David Cronenberg was coming off his first big hit in Scanners, a horror film about killer telepaths that was sold with the image of a man’s head exploding. 

The money shot from Scanners.

Videodrome combined the body and sexual horror themes of Cronenberg’s earlier, low-budget indies with his musings about the evolving media landscape that was increasingly saturated with an expanding cable TV landscape and the home video revolution brought on by the spread of the videocassette players. Cronenberg’s nightmare was a population desensitized to horror and violence and imbued with a desire to merge with the machines delivering the images. 

Debbie Harry in VIdeodrome

Starring TV actor James Woods and punk goddess Debbie Harry, the film lost money on release, but became a cult classic when teenage horror addicts seeking cheap thrills found it on video store shelves in the late 80s. Cronenberg moved on to big budget horror pictures in Hollywood, such as his classic remake of The Fly, and later outré literary adaptation such as Naked Lunch and Crash.  But for many fans, Videodrome remains his masterpiece. 

Tonight at 7 PM, Indie Memphis is screening Videodrome as part of the Memphis in May salute to Canadian cinema. Afterwards, yours truly will participate in a panel discussion with Commercial Appeal  film critic John Beifuss, Black Lodge Video proprietor Matt Martin, and University of Memphis Communications professor Marina Levina. 

Inside Videodrome

Categories
News News Blog

Urban Child Gives $2M to U of M Project

Justin Fox Burkes

The Urban Child Institue headquarters on Jefferson.

The Urban Child Institute (TUCI) has given $2 million to the University of Memphis for a project focused on the health of at-risk children.

Earlier this year, the Memphis nonprofit organization announced a new gifting strategy that would give $8 million in 2016 to organizations supporting children’s needs. The new strategy increased the amount of money TUCI will give annually to children’s causes.

The U of M’s $2 million grant was outlined in April as a part of that gifting strategy. The money will support a project with the university, the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, and Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital.

The Adverse Childhood Experiences Prevention Project (ACE). aims to “create a culture of health for vulnerable children in Memphis,” according to a Wednesday news release from the U of M, and will focus on areas such as child neglect and abuse, housing, asthma, and breastfeeding.

The university’s contributions to the Adverse Childhood Experiences Prevention Project will help to ensure the implementation of holistic, integrated approaches to enhancing the health and educational environments of the most needy infants and toddlers in the area.” said U of M Provost Karen Weddle-West. 

Categories
Music Music Blog

“Memphis Does Prince” Tribute Concert Announced

Graham Winchester, the man who brought you the David Bowie benefit earlier this year, is back with another tribute show to a fallen music idol. On Friday, June 10th,  a dozen Memphis musicians will perform Prince classics at the 1884 Lounge in Minglewood Hall, with the proceeds benefitting St. Jude. 

Steve Selvidge, Hope Clayburn, Winchester & The Amunition, The Incredible Hook, Southern Avenue, Clay Otis and the Addults, Chinese Connection Dub Embassy, Lightajo, The Candy Company, Marcella Simien, Another Green World, and Kitty Dearing will all be performing Prince classics, and the list of sponsors and vendors has yet to be announced. The show is all ages, starts at 7 p.m., and tickets range from $15-$17 dollars. Check out a classic prince track below, and make plans to catch some of Memphis’ most known musicians put their spin on one of the greatest artists of all time. 

‘Memphis Does Prince’ Tribute Concert Announced

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

Will the Real Keith Williams Please Stand Up?

JB

Rep. Johnnie Turner addressing attendees at a Diversity Memphis forum last week

Name confusion has played a significant role in many a past election in Memphis and Shelby County.
Just ask Roderick Ford, a sometime candidate who has never been elected to anything, although he has netted a few extra votes in a race or two from people who (mistakenly) assumed him to be a member of the long-established Ford political clan.

Or, even better, ask William Chism, a novice candidate whose 2014 win in the Democratic primary for Probate Court Clerk, no doubt owed much to his last name, identical to that of non-relative Sidney Chism, well-known political broker, former state Senator and, at the time, a prominent member of the Shelby County Commission.

But those were, in the end, minor distractions that came to nothing much, bumps in the road compared to the more serious misunderstanding that could confront Democratic voters in state House District 85, where veteran state Representative Johnnie Turner has two primary opponents, one of whom bears a name long familiar within the councils of local public education.

This

from left: the pro-vouchers Keith Williams who is Rep. Turner’s opponent; Keith O. Williams, the anti-voucher executive director of the MSCEA and a Turner supporter

 would be Keith Williams, whose candidacy is indeed focused on education. Sort of. This Keith Williams — identified as a pastor, Memphis parent, and senior adviser for the “Tennessee Black Alliance for Educational Options” — testified to the General Assembly this past year in favor of state vouchers for use in private school.

That’s something that is pure anathema to another and much better known Keith Williams (Keith O. Williams, more fully) who has served as both chairman and executive director of the Memphis/Shelby County Education Association and who is a vehement and vocal opponent of school vouchers.

To compound the potential confusion, Keith Williams of the MSCEA ran unsuccessfully last year for the Memphis City Council, and the presence on this year’s election ballot of someone with the same name could be a real voter snag.

Rep. Turner, a former teacher and a decided opponent of school vouchers herself, says that Keith Williams of the MSCEA has pledged his support to her and will do what he can to clear up such voter confusion as might be. 

Categories
Book Features Books

City on Fire: a long, slow burn.

Are you trying to set a record for the longest time to read a book?” My wife asked me this question one night recently as I turned to page 745.

I began reading City on Fire (Knopf) by Garth Risk Hallberg when it first came out. That was back in October of last year, and I’ve only just finished. I’m a notoriously slow reader, and this tome is 944 pages. Still, I should have finished it earlier. Why didn’t I? Things got in the way: Work. Kids. I clicked around on Facebook, made a tweet or two. I binge-watched House of Cards and Daredevil. We started and finished every season of Black Sails in the time it’s taken me to read this book.

These are the things that go into making us who we are, the DNA of our personalities. Okay, maybe not marathon viewings of Netflix, but certainly real-life interactions and the discussion of television over beers at a local taproom.

Just as these are the ingredients that go into making us the gumbo of who we are, writers cobble such details together to create characters and plot lines. Many times, reams of paper are used, flash drives filled, whole novellas written in creating the backstory for characters. Most of the time, these are pages for a drawer or the trash. But sometimes all of that backstory makes it into print — necessary for the reader’s understanding or not — to flesh out a 944-page novel.

A long book isn’t necessarily a bad thing, unless the story drowns in the undulating waves of exposition, digression, and flashback, and I’m afraid that’s what’s happened with City on Fire. Hallberg is a gifted writer and builds a dramatic and detailed backdrop of 1970s New York, which unfortunately loses its focus as the action drags. In the final section, there is a sense of urgency that propels us toward the climax, but it feels like an afterthought to all that’s come before.

The storylines in Hallberg’s debut novel are compelling. The characters are fully formed. The voice is strong. The gumbo is delicious. My issue is with the editor who left the directions for the sausage-making right there on the wrapper for us all to see — every character’s backstory, every sub-subplot’s arc.

But perhaps it’s not solely a problem of editing. It’s the same issue I ran into with The Goldfinch (Little, Brown). Donna Tart’s 773-page novel had a buzz, more even than City on Fire and its reported $2 million advance for Hallberg (did I mention this is his first novel?), and I read both books expectantly, the way my kids eagerly anticipate a vacation to the beach. What they don’t anticipate is the long, seemingly endless road trip it takes to get to that destination. Indeed, the reading of Goldfinch and City both elicited more than one “How much longer?” and “Are we almost there?” from me.

More than editing, though, I think it’s a problem with publishing. Every so often one of the big five houses, in a snit over the media’s fascination for Amazon’s attempts to conquer their world, feels the need to say, “Look at us! We’re still relevant! Look what we can do!” And in those moments, they woo agents and they create bidding wars and they manufacture hype for a novel the size of a toaster oven and a writer yet to prove his worth. That novel becomes the binge-watching of the publishing world.

But then again, I’m probably just bitter. Because in the months it took me to read City on Fire, along with work and television, I also finished writing my own novel. That 243-page manuscript is currently treading in the query-and-rejection pool of publication. So if publishers can pay $2 million for a book, then good for them. And good for us, too, because we need more compelling stories, well-formed characters, and strong voices such that City on Fire and The Goldfinch offer, regardless of the road it takes to get there.

Once I (finally) finished City on Fire, I had to give this book, which had lived on my nightstand for so long, a home. To do so, I displaced much slimmer volumes of Camus, Morrison, and Fitzgerald. Is it worthy? Does its heft make it a better book than these? I’m afraid it’s not even in their weight class.