Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

Ballet Memphis’ “I Am”

Ballet Memphis choreographer Steven McMahon remembers struggling to strike the right tone with his assignment. He was tasked with developing the title work for I Am, a collection of four short identity-focused dance pieces all loosely inspired by an important piece of civil rights iconography. “Obviously, the ‘I am a man’ statement is particularly important to our city,” he says.

Reggie Wilson’s “I Am a Man: Grace and Dignity” uses a dozen dancers and repetitive abstract gesture to reflect on the Memphis sanitation workers strike, how movements grow, and how messages struggle to be understood. Other works like Gabrielle Lamb’s “I Am a Woman,” used “I Am” as a springboard to essay the male gaze and how women dress for themself vs. how they dress for others. Julia Adams’ “I Am a Child,” was inspired by artist Cornelia Parker’s suspended sculpture Anti-Mass, which is built entirely from the charred remains of a Baptist Church destroyed by arsonists.

“I think Julia tried to put herself in the position of someone who lost a child in the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing in Birmingham, Alabama, and to take us through the five stages of grief,” McMahon says. “It’s heavy, but it’s special. And now it’s maybe more relevant now than ever.

“It’s difficult to sum up an evening of heavy material,” McMahon says. He finally found his inspiration for his concluding work in Mahalia Jackson’s live recording of “You’ll Never Walk Alone” and the African humanist philosophy, ubuntu.

“It roughly translates, ‘I am because we are,'” McMahon says. “I thought that was a pretty powerful and succinct way to bring together all these other things we’re trying to share.”

Categories
Editorial Opinion

FedEx and the NRA

Proud as we have often been of being home base to FedEx, a company notable for its leadership in business affairs and consumer needs, we now confess to being embarrassed by the company’s refusal, in the wake of the latest gun massacre, to consider ending the favorable discounts it offers members of the National Rifle Association.

Even Donald Trump has addressed the point. The president, speaking to the nation’s governors on Monday, advised them to remember that, for all the “great people” who make up the NRA, it might be neceseary “to fight ’em” on gun-control issues. As a statement indicating intentionality, of course, that one is right up there with his quickly withdrawn pledge to a bipartisan group of Senators back in January that he would support whatever pro-Dreamer immigration bill they might come up with — hopefully an honest-to-God “bill of love.”

On matters relating to promises of action, Trump has a tendency, in Jonathan Swift’s phrase, to “say the thing that is not.” A somewhat surreal version of that came this week when the president, in the course of vilifying a security officer’s apparent inaction at the site of the Parkland High School slaughter, swore that had he been on the scene, he himself, armed or unarmed, would have rushed into the school building to confront the crazed shooter.

Right. Nothing quite so heroic is required, of course. All that Trump needs to do is follow through on his vow to contradict Wayne LaPierre and the NRA gun lobby by actually pushing for some of the serious legislative measures he has championed in his verbal bravado — a raised age limit for firearms purchase, a ban on bump stocks, stiffer and more universal background checks, etc.

The task incumbent on FedEx is even less demanding. All the giant shipping corporation needs to do is follow the example of Hertz, Delta, Symantec, MertLife, United Airlines, and a growing number of other large companies that have ended their discount offers for NRA members in the past week or so. Surely the powers-that-be at FedEx, now threatened with an organized national boycott, realize that the small profit margin forsworn by ending its NRA discounts could easily be absorbed, and that the moral example of taking a stand against gun fetishism would likely translate into a bounty of new-customer approval from the population at large.

Instead, FedEx has vowed to continue with its program for NRA members on the disingenuous grounds that it “does not or will not deny service or discriminate against any legal entity regardless of their policy positions or political views.”

Nobody has asked FedEx to deny service to anyone or to suppress anybody’s views or to practice any form of customer discrimination. It is a matter, rather, of putting the NRA on notice for its decades-long policy of undermining any and all common-sense gun reforms.

And, as far as the politics of the matter, it is clearly the NRA itself, not those who resist it, which maintains a political stranglehold on the nation and its lawmakers. In this hour of decision, FedEx absolutely, positively should take a stand.

Categories
Cover Feature News

Five Reasons to Keep Watching the Grizzlies

Grizzlies fans have had it pretty easy since the 2009-10 season: Since acquiring Zach Randolph, the team has been in the playoffs every season but his first one, and in that one, they were only eliminated after Marc Gasol went down with an injury. For seven seasons in a row, the Grizzlies have been playing well into April, and sometimes well into May, and even in the years where it was clear they wouldn’t advance — such as 2016’s injury-gutted roster or last year’s hopeless matchup against the Spurs that somehow went six games — getting there felt like enough for the fanbase. They just wanted the Grizzlies to be competitive.

This year, the Grizzlies are not competitive. They’re not even close to competitive; at the time of this writing, they’re the fourth-worst team in the Western Conference (only because Phoenix, Dallas, and Sacramento have more losses; all four teams have only 18 wins). This is the worst Grizzlies season since 2008-09, when they won 24 games. They fired David Fizdale, only 18 months after hiring him. Mike Conley has only played in 12 games. Chandler Parsons has only played in 27. Just about everything that could go wrong for them has gone wrong, and now it’s clear that they’re far more interested in developing young players and trying to maintain a good draft pick than actually winning games.

It’s not a pretty picture. Judging from Internet ire, many people don’t understand why the Grizzlies are “tanking” the season away — losing on purpose — but regardless, they certainly didn’t enter the season expecting to be this bad. As fans of a plucky underdog franchise that has no pluck and is certainly dogging it, why does it matter what happens the rest of the season? Why even watch these games? Why not just do something else, like watch the Tigers or drink on a patio somewhere or take up cross-stitching? Here are five reasons:

Photographs by Larry Kuzniewski

JB Bickerstaff

1. They’re More Fun Than They Should Be

There is not a column in the NBA standings for “moral victories,” but if there were, the Grizzlies would have racked up quite a few already. They may not be winning games, but they’re certainly not getting blown out with the regularity one might expect from a team no longer interested in playing basketball. This is not as true after the All Star Break as it was before; they lost the first two games back by a combined total of 49 points. But that doesn’t mean interesting things aren’t happening.

If you listen to what interim head coach JB Bickerstaff says after losses this year, he’s very consistently delivering one message: We are trying to build a culture of players who play a certain way, and that takes years. Little glimpses of that culture are available in every game: the ball movement is sometimes phenomenal. The defense sometimes holds when normally it wouldn’t. The young players — especially Jarell Martin and James Ennis III before he was traded to Detroit at the deadline — are getting better at transition play-making, and occasionally that leads to monster dunks.

Watching a bad NBA team is all about finding things to enjoy at the micro level, because the macro level is garbage. Fans who only want the Grizzlies to win probably stopped watching some time around Thanksgiving. Those of us who are left have to take solace in little plays, in neat developments, in solid comeback attempts that fizzle out before the Grizzlies get over the hump. There are fun moments in most of these games; you just have to watch for small victories instead of, well, victories that actually count.

Jarell Martin

2. Dillon Brooks and Ivan Rabb

The Grizzlies’ two rookies, both drafted in the second round last offseason, have both been surprisingly good, and both look like major wins for the Griz front office staff.

Brooks has proven himself to be scrappy, unafraid of the big moment, a cerebral player who sometimes makes things happen through sheer … shall we say “fortitude.” He’s played more minutes than any Griz rookie in recent memory with the possible exception of Andrew Harrison (more on him farther down the list): 1,634 minutes spread across a team-leading 58 games, 50 of which he’s started. Brooks’ development has been fun to watch, and the whole league has taken notice. A native of the Toronto area, he was selected to play on Team World in the Rising Stars Challenge at All Star Weekend, the new-fangled version of the old Rookie/Sophomore Game. Not many second-round guys get to play in that game. The Grizzlies struck paydirt with Brooks.

Ivan Rabb is a bit farther away from having the kind of NBA impact that Brooks has had so far, but he’s shown considerable promise. Rabb is undersized, but he makes up for it (mostly) with his skill, and while it’s a little hard to tell whether he’s a center or a power forward, it’s clear that he has the tools to become a rotation player if he can get stronger. Rabb was projected to be a lottery pick before returning to Cal for an ill-advised second season, and it’s clear that he (and Brooks alike) have outsized talent for their humble draft positions.

Both of these guys will be NBA players, and they’re both growing in small ways every time the Grizzlies take the floor. Guys only learn now to be NBA players by playing minutes in NBA games — something previous Griz coaches haven’t always seemed to understand — and it’s fascinating to watch guys like Rabb and Brooks add new weapons and new strategies to their respective toolkits each time they touch the ball.

Dillon Brooks

3. Which Young Guys Will Make It?

Brooks and Rabb aren’t the only young Grizzlies players worth watching, but for the rest of the younger players (Cubs? Can we call them Grizzly Cubs?) the question of what they’ll learn is a bit more existential. Jarell Martin, Andrew Harrison, and Deyonta Davis each need to prove that they can be NBA players next year, and they each only have 20-odd games left in which to do so.

Harrison has made the strongest case, so far. He and Martin were both consensus picks to be waived during training camp, but played their way on to the final 15-man roster. Since then, Harrison has shown himself to be a better shooter than last year, and a smarter and somewhat faster decision-maker. He’s still slow, but he’s a very good defender and a very heady player, seeing things no other Grizzly Cubs see and capitalizing on them. If he can raise his shooting percentages just a bit more — he’s now 42.3 percent from the field, and 35.3 percent from three-point range — both improvements over last year — I think Harrison could have a very long career as a useful third point guard on a good team. He’s this close to being there now, especially since setting a new career high of 28 points just before the All Star Break.

Martin and Davis are harder nuts to crack. Martin has developed into a very good transition finisher, and has used his uncommon athleticism to good end on offense and defense. He’s become a much more aware and skilled player on offense, but he still doesn’t have a good handle on what to do when the game slows down into half-court sets (which is often). “Good in transition” isn’t good enough to stick in the NBA past a rookie contract, and Martin’s getting short on runway to prove he’s more than that.

Davis has more upside than Martin and probably more than Ivan Rabb, also. At his natural position, he’s an intinctively good defender, and he’s developing a bit of a touch farther away from the basket, but the issue with Davis is his focus and his motor. He often seems distant or lost on the court, especially if he’s not involved in the offense early after taking the floor. By any objective measure, Davis should be farther along in his development than he is, and if the Grizzlies are going to continue to invest time and money into his NBA education, he’s got to start showing signs of learning some of these lessons. Whether that happens or not is one of the things worth watching for the rest of the year.

Andrew Harrison

4. The 2018 Draft

There’s a reason the Grizzlies aren’t very interested in winning, and that so many other teams are trying to race them to the bottom of the standings: The 2018 draft class seems very promising at the top, and after trading last year’s pick to dump Marreese Speights’ salary and trading next year’s pick for Jeff Green, the Griz actually control their own pick in this year’s draft.

There are intriguing prospects all over the floor in the top of the lottery: Luka Doncic is probably the best Euro prospect (other than Giannis Antetokounmpo, who appeared out of nowhere) since Pau Gasol. Mohamed Bamba promises to be a fearsome rim protector, but his offense is a work in progress. Arizona’s Deandre Ayton and Marvin Bagley are great scoring and rebounding bigs. Michael Porter Jr. has a very promising skill set but hasn’t played all year because of injuries (making him a natural choice for the Grizzlies to pick, and I hope you can visualize how hard I’m rolling my eyes while typing that) so he’s a bit of a risk. Trae Young could be an elite scorer or he could be fool’s gold, a college Steph Curry who might be too small to make it work at the pro level. It’s anybody’s guess as to which of the two it’ll be.

Watching the Grizzlies means you’re watching to see how bad they’ll be — and which of these coveted young talents they’ll be able to add to the roster. Doncic is probably my favorite at the moment, but I don’t think the Grizzlies will actually be bad enough to draft him, because I think he’ll probably be the number one or two pick. But miracles happen to the Grizzlies all the time, if not in the draft, so who knows. It’s a race to the bottom because adding one of these guys to a team that (hypothetically) also returns a healthy Gasol and Conley with a core of “young vet” players who have all come up together could make things very interesting next year. I have to think that’s the Grizzlies’ plan.

5. Ownership: The Most Known Unknown

As has been discussed in these pages before, there’s a big open question hanging over this season like a dark cloud that may or may not rain: Who’s going to own the team next year? Any ownership change would likely mean a change in the basketball leadership as well, which means making decisions about coaches and players is also hampered by the sense of uncertainty around what’s going to happen going forward. The last I heard, the ownership situation might not be settled until after the regular season (which ends on April 11th), and until it’s all settled, none of the other decisions explored in this piece may be finalized.

Whether Robert Pera or Steve Kaplan is the controlling owner of the Grizzlies after this season, just having that closure will be clarifying for the long-term course charted by the franchise, and that charting will have to start this offseason. They won’t be in the Conley/Gasol era for much longer, and now is the time to lay the groundwork for the next phase of Grizzlies basketball, and that can’t truly be done until there’s someone in charge who knows he or she (it’s the pro sports business, so it’ll probably “he”) will be there for longer than one more year.

There are players whose development is worth watching, losses to pile up so the Griz have a better shot at taking a great player in the draft, and there’s still a great deal of fight in this team, given that this group knows that many games will be a hopeless struggle.

The Grizzlies will not be continuing their playoff streak this year — that much seems obvious — but if fans can embrace pulling for a bad team trying to learn its place, there’s plenty worth watching for the rest of the season. Bad basketball can be just as interesting as good basketball, just in different ways. That’s a lesson Grizzlies fans will have to re-learn, because it’s been many years since they’ve had to endure anything quite like this season.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Two Approaches to Political Advertising

Anybody who’s been raised since the advent of television (which is everybody now alive) knows the importance of TV ads in political races. The advertising phase of several campaigns is just now coming into prominence. In the case of Shelby County political races, there are but two months to go before the May 1st election day in the Republican and Democratic primaries. Statewide races, which culminate in August, have a bit more lead time.  

Two new ads that are just now getting to be seen by the public indicate wholly different strategies. One is on behalf of Shelby County Trustee and GOP county mayor candidate David Lenoir. The other is for gubernatorial candidate Randy Boyd of Knoxville, the former state Commissioner of Economic Development.

Though Lenoir is well known in local government circles, he is not exactly a household name. Accordingly, his new 30-second TV spot attempts to fill a name-ID gap between himself and primary opponent Shelby County Commissioner Terry Roland, a firebrand who is adept at gathering free media coverage for himself.

Lenoir’s spot begins with an image of a football helmet, which fades into a shot of the candidate as a young man, wearing the crimson uniform of the University of Alabama, and clearly game-ready. A voice-over then explains, “When an injury ended his dreams to play in the NFL, David Lenoir refused to stand on the sidelines.”

In fact, Lenoir, whose athletic career ended prematurely due to injury, was once a highly touted defensive end for the fearsome Crimson Tide. The duration of the ad shows images of Lenoir at work and on the campaign stump, looking both accessible and able, while the voice-over speaks of his “reduc[ing] county debt and saving taxpayers millions.” The ad promises that Lanier will “fight to protect our neighborhoods and strengthen our schools” and contends that Shelby Countians “need a mayor with drive and determination.” 

Lenoir has ample funding and will be able to play that ad, and subsequent ones, abundantly in the face of Roland’s newsmaking skills and hot-button pushing, and his other GOP opponent, Joy Touliatos, whose pleasant countenance is displayed on several well-placed billboards on county roadways. No doubt each of them has a TV campaign in mind as well.

Meanwhile, Boyd, a pleasant, mild-mannered man who was a highly successful businessman (Invisible Fences) before his service in state government, where he was known as a moderate, is up against a primary opponent in U.S. Rep. Diane Black who is as well-funded as he is and has a strong hold on her party’s ultra-right constituency.

So Boyd, who has run a couple of TV ads already, stressing his business success, his grit as a distance runner, and his ambitions on behalf of economic development and education, has belatedly decided to contest Black (one of whose ads boasts her readiness to “stand up to the weak-kneed people in my own party”) on her own ground.

Accordingly, while the images in Boyd’s new ad are similar to those in his previous ones, a voice-over intones that the candidate “believes that the right to life comes from God, not the government,” and that people “who can work should work and not permanently live on welfare,” while a subscript on the screen blasts the notion of sanctuary cities. The ad concludes, “What really matters is faith, families, and a good-paying job. A conservative businessman, not a politician.”

Asked about the ad over the weekend in Memphis, where he attended the GOP’s Lincoln Day banquet, Boyd said, “If I’m asking Republicans for their votes, I need to assure them that I share their values.”

The ad, an effort to co-opt an opponent’s issues, is clearly a gamble, and it remains to be seen whether it serves the candidate’s purposes or, alternatively, could backfire with GOP voters looking for a moderate candidate.

Categories
Book Features Books

Lorenzo Marone’s The Temptation to Be Happy

“Everything Happens to Me” is a jazz standard first recorded by the Tommy Dorsey Orchestra and Frank Sinatra in 1940. Around that same time is when Cesare Annunziata, the antihero of Lorenzo Marone’s striking novel (translated from the Italian by Shaun Whiteside), The Temptation to Be Happy, would have been born, and Cesare might have taken that song as his life’s anthem.

When we meet Cesare he is 77 years old, and to say he’s curmudgeonly would be an understatement. I’d say he’s a loveable curmudgeon but, honestly, there’s not much to love about Cesare as a person.

A widower, he lives alone in a building of mostly elderly people in Naples, Italy. He actively avoids those who live around him, lingering at the lobby mailbox if someone else is waiting for the elevator and avoiding standing in lines at the market. “Christ, there’s nothing worse than a sociable person,” Cesare thinks. “What’s so great about meeting a new individual? We’re all the same anyway, more or less, a collection of shortcomings walking along the street and trying to avoid similar collections.”

He rightly refers to these avoidances as “my sociopathic urges.” Come to think of it, sociopath might be a better description of Cesare than curmudgeon.

He inhabits his dismal building as comfortably as he does his own mind, to which the reader is given free access. When a young couple moves in across the hall, it’s as if the modern world beyond his front stoop has crashed his very consciousness. Cesare thinks, “At their age they still haven’t worked out that yes, it’s important to reach your target, but there’s no record to beat. It’s better to reach the finishing line slowly, enjoy the landscape, maintain a measured pace and regular breathing for the whole journey, finishing the race as late as possible.”

On the surface, it seems as though Cesare’s concern is with the urgency with which they conduct their affairs and that roses might go un-smelled. But remember, everything happens to Cesare, and what truly worries him is the noise that is sure to invade his quiet hovel.

And noise does accompany the young couple, though it’s not that of cocktail parties, but of furniture breaking and a woman’s cries. His neighbor is being abused and even sociopathic Cesare can’t stand for that. Begrudgingly, he enlists the help of neighbors — the crazy cat lady next door and the shut-in a floor below. Together, this unlikely justice league takes on the task of rescue.

This is about all the concern Cesare can muster because, as he’s striving to help a stranger, his relationship with his two grown children continues to capsize. Righting it is seemingly beyond Cesare’s capacity because its sunken state is, conveniently, not his fault. He says of his late wife, Caterina, “Because of her pregnancy I was forced to abandon forever my rebellious impulse — it was my wife’s fault that I would lead a life I didn’t want. That was when I began to hate her.”

Ever the victim, he’s burdened his son and daughter with his regret, saying, “He became homosexual; she egocentric and neurotic.” That quote says a lot about Cesare, and his thoughts on homosexuality and women. He goes on to say aloud to his dead wife, “If you were here, we could swap roles now. Perhaps that way we could compensate a little bit for the damage done!” As if being gay and headstrong were damages to be repaired.

In the end, it is Cesare who is damaged. What’s more, he realizes it and names it before we ever can. He is not completely alone in that apartment — he lives with ghosts and regrets as he laments, “I’m not capable of giving love to those who have a right to it.”

When tragedy strikes, it strikes hard, and Marone’s writing shines brightest as he pulls the reader into the scene, into the very room where life is slipping away and Cesare alone fights to save it. But still, there’s the old Cesare and his thoughts on it all — “Life is giving me a second chance” — as he makes it about himself.