The NCAA came down hard on Derrick Rose and the University of Memphis in its response to the university’s appeal of NCAA sanctions involving Rose.
“As for whether Rose himself ‘knew or had reason to know’ of the ineligibility, unfortunately we cannot be certain, but only because of Rose’s failure to cooperate in the investigation. Surely the university cannot insulate itself completely from the consequences of the conduct either. Even though the university’s efforts to get Rose to cooperate were commendable, his conduct still hindered the investigation considerably,” according to the NCAA Committee on Infractions report released this week by the university.
The response notes that the committee chose not to impose a ban on postseason play or a scholarship reduction, but stripped the 2008 men’s basketball team of its 38 wins and tournament revenues instead. If those penalties are set aside on appeal, the committee will request an opportunity “to reassess the penalties.”
In other words, if the UM wants to rumble, the committee on infractions is ready. Sheri Lipman, legal counsel for the university, said UM will have a response on Monday. It will be directed to Infractions Appeals Committee, which is different from the Committee on Infractions.
