Categories
Opinion

“A New Perspective”

Ask Tomeka Hart about her career aspirations and

she’s quick to point out that she’s not a politician. She says that two terms on the Memphis City Schools board will probably be the extent of her public

service. If she’s lucky.

Her political future depends on the voters of District 7, who for 17 years

have been represented on the school board by the Rev. Hubon Sandridge. If Hart

wins, the 33-year-old lawyer will represent a district that includes five of this year’s

No Child Left Behind failing schools. She says she is ready for the challenge.

“My main issue is and always will be the children,” says Hart. “Every

decision the board makes should be determined by the question, Does it benefit the

students? If it doesn’t, I will vote against it. We have to somehow get everyone

involved in the education process, especially parents. If they won’t come to

the schools, we’ve got to go to them.”

After graduating from Trezevant High School and the University of

Tennessee, Hart moved to Georgia and taught junior high and high school business

courses in Cobb County. When she decided to go to law school, her mother

convinced her to return home and apply to the University of Memphis. “I was so

surprised when I moved back and heard all the negative news about the

school board,” says Hart. “Our kids deserve

so much better than what they are getting, which is a lot of grandstanding.”

Cardell Orrin, Hart’s campaign manager, says his candidate offers a “new

perspective.” Hart and Orrin plan to meet with community organizations,

parents, and students during a door-to-door introduction campaign. Orrin says

he wants to raise $25,000 for his candidate. Hart

is also backed by a young professional organization called New Path, and

Orrin has organized volunteers from that group and is meeting with potential

contributors. Last week, there was a fund-raiser

for Hart in the South Main district.

Although Hart has not talked with Sandridge, she knows his platform

and his board history. “I don’t see this as

old versus young, but you have to have a change in ideas,” she says.

The platforms of Hart and Sandridge, 54, are almost completely

opposite. Sandridge supports corporal punishment; Hart opposes it. Sandridge

vehemently opposes closing underpopulated schools, specifically Manassas High; if closing

a school is in the best interest of students, Hart would support it.

“I do not think [this position]

should be a lifetime appointment,” she says.

“If you haven’t made a difference and empowered somebody else in that time, then

it’s time to move on.”

But being in politics is a lifetime

appointment, says Sandridge. “They’re [Hart and other opponents] just

campaigning. You don’t just run a race to get out

there. You have to be on the field every day,”

he says. “Don’t get me wrong. I’m delighted to see the interest in these young

people, but I don’t ever intend to get out of the political arena, because it patrols our

lives 24 hours a day, seven days a week.”

Sandridge has been criticized for his tumultuous relationships with other

board members. His antics, including yelling, finger-pointing, and stormy walkouts,

have all been chronicled by local television.

Still, Sandridge doesn’t seem worried about his reelection chances. “My

constituency knows me. The record is what you run

on,” he says. “The arguing within the board

is not always fighting, but what you call political debate. All you see on TV is me

arguing, but I’m just a passionate leader. And at the

end of the day [the media] does not show what happens

positively.”

Hart is single, has no children, and works for the law firm of Young and

Perl as a labor and employment attorney. “What shocks me the most is

when people ask why I care, since I don’t have any children in the school system,”

she says. “Do we have to have kids in the system to care? We have to care

because we will pay for not caring about these

students, one way or another.”