FROM
Beyond the funhouse walls
Geov Parrish – workingforchange.com
03.26.03 – One of the most frequent requests or questions I receive is for suggestions as to where to go to get better or a broader spectrum of information than what America’s mainstream networks and big dailies specialize in.
As most readers of this site have already likely concluded, especially during time of war, what we get from our entertainment-driven media isn’t usually the whole story. In the past few weeks and especially since the invasion of Iraq began last week, even that characterization would be a kindness. American network TV’s emetic fare doesn’t just resemble government propaganda; it is propaganda, taking current events and burying them under a fact-free blizzard of emotionalism, jingoism, and generous use of the first person plural (“Which sites did we bomb today, General?”). Repeated in endless variations, the cumulative effect, and the intent, is to rally the home front. Predictably, it’s working — more effectively than anything on Iraqi state radio ever could, because even beyond the whiz-bang technology and psychographic refinement of the American networks, Iraqi audiences are under no illusions about the biases of their government-run media.
However, technology doesn’t just help the Pentagon build bigger bombs and enable TV “news” programs to glorify the notion of pain-free, cost-free, rationale-free military invasions. It also enables more inquisitive folks to escape the funhouse. Via the Internet, Americans (and anyone else) can sample media coverage virtually anywhere of fast moving events — from Iraqi deserts to the streets and conference rooms of the world’s capitals — in a
way never before possible during wartime.
As with last year’s Israeli Easter offensive and 2001’s Afghan invasion and 9/11, the news that audiences in Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America get — both of the invasion of Iraq itself and of global reaction to it — is very different than what we’re seeing here. The gulf, both in public perceptions and in the resulting policy decisions, seems to be widening; about that, more tomorrow.
In the meantime, here’s a short and necessarily incomplete list of sources I’ve found helpful for coverage of this invasion.
(eds. note: At publication time, not all links in this list were
operational. All URLs are believed to be correct.)
(listed in alphabetical order)
FROM THE ISLAMIC WORLD:
English language versions of Islamic newspapers:
www.ahram.org.eg/weekly
state-owned;
www.dailystar.com.lb
www.gulf-times.com
www.jang.com.pk/thenews
Pakistan, excellent reporting on Afghan war.
Other sources for regional news:
www.al-jazeera.net
www.allafrica.com
news coverage of Islamic Africa;
www.haaretzdaily.com
www.irna.com
www.islamonline.net/english
IslamOnline.net, an impressive pan-Islamic site (Arabic & English) of news,
opinion, and culture;
www.memri.org
EUROPEAN SOURCES:
Daily newspapers & TV:
www.bbc.co.uk
www.dailytelegraph.co.uk
www.guardian.co.uk
years ago, the Manchester Guardian), Britain’s leading left-leaning daily,
also publishes London Observer on Sundays;
www.independent.co.uk
www.dailymirror.co.uk
www.ireland.com
www.MondeDiplo.com
separate online magazine published by Le Monde, the prestigious Paris daily. It’s not the daily (that’s only available in French), but still a good source for European perspectives on international issues.
Other Western voices:
www.debka.com
affairs writer);
www.eurasianews.com
www.iwpr.net
www.mwaw.org
formed after 9/11 by disgruntled BBC and Guardian employees scrutinizing British media coverage of the Afghan invasion, has since morphed into
becoming, as well, a British anti-war.com, with news on much of the global anti-war movement;
www.estriples.com
Forces. Not just the military “line” — the Pentagon figured out ages ago that providing an honest reflection of what men (and now women) in uniform care about is in the long run far more useful than printing a house organ that refuses to acknowledge reality. This is war news stripped of the jingoism and feel-good fluff, and from military contractor scandals to battlefield (and, probably, occupation) difficulties, you’re far more likely to read about it here than stateside. Oh, and if you want to support the troops, you can find out what they actually care most about — like getting some toilet paper into Kuwait…
www.wombatnews.com
Wire Services: Try accessing wire service articles, such as Reuters or Associated Press, before they’ve been edited by their local or national newspaper editors. They’re posted on AOL, Yahoo, MSN, and a host of other commercial internet service providers. Because they’re originally written for a wide variety of media outlets (with the same article often running
internationally), the original wire service articles have been miles above
the versions eventually printed in the NY Times, Wash. Post, and other major
daily newspapers: they’re timely, they contain body counts, and they contain
“unofficial” quotes from US military men on the front lines that often
contradict the glowing quotes from Pentagon spokesmen.
ALTERNATIVE U.S. MEDIA:
www.alternet.org
newspapers, magazines, and web sites around the country, but also carries a
lot of great original content;
www.anti-war.com
priceless source of news and opinion on militarism and the resistance to it;
www.commondreams.com
www.fair.org
invaluable media watchdog group;
www.indymedia.org
activism-oriented, with links to over 90 local indymedia sites around the
world, including Israel & Palestine (a site which is very good). Can be
stunning in its on the spot coverage of protest, but the open publishing
policies of many of its affiliates can mean its quality varies wildly in
reliability;
www.inthesetimes.com
updated more frequently than the print publication;
www.motherjones.com
their daily site tends to be harder-edged and not as focused on long
investigative pieces as the monthly print version;
www.thenation.com
many features that don’t make it to print;
www.theonion.com
satirical newspaper that’s more painfully truthful than the garbage in your
local chain-owned daily;
www.theprogressive.com
magazine;
www.tompaine.com
www.utne.com
with little of the new agey lifestyle material the print monthly uses to
spice newsstand sales; www.workingforchange.com
you found it!;
www.yellowtimes.org
essentially a very good clipping service;
www.zmag.org
read European edition. Chomsky’s a close buddy, and ZNet tends to be more
focused on activism and radical alternatives than most of the above outlets.
As mentioned, this is necessarily incomplete, with no slight intended for a number of fine sites not listed here. I’ve run such lists in the past, I’m always looking for more suggestions — and the web generates good new ones far faster than any one person can keep track. Send ’em along and I’ll run a follow-up list as the opportunity allows.