Categories
Music Music Features

AFTER THE GOLD RUSH

I fell in love with Ryan Adams the moment I first heard his voice. It was in the early fall of ’97 and I was driving down Highway 61, 50 miles south of Memphis.

I popped in a mix tape someone had mailed me, and Adams’ voice suddenly filled my car: “I try not to think/’Cause if I sit and drink/Then I’ll go crazy.” I cranked up the volume, wanting more: “In the daytime I’m lonesome/In the nighttime I’m sad.”

Pulling off the highway, I scanned the homemade tape cover — the song was called “Desperate Ain’t Lonely,” and the name of the band was Whiskeytown. I listened, rewound the tape, listened again. And when I quit crying enough that I could see the road through my windshield, I headed to the nearest liquor store.

Two musician friends of mine had died that summer, and I was alone, drifting from my many friends who couldn’t possibly — in my mind — comprehend what I had lost. This band, and the boy who led it, Ryan Adams, a man-child really — he was 20 when he cut Whiskeytown’s Faithless Street, which included “Desperate Ain’t Lonely” — knew what I felt. They knew it and he sang it, for me and for all the brokenhearted souls.

When I sobered up, I did some research on Whiskeytown. They had two albums out, Faithless Street and the brooding Stranger’s Almanac, both refreshing additions to the then-burgeoning alt-country scene. Ryan Adams — who alleged that Whiskeytown was his second choice for a band name; he preferred Sin City — was the frontman and the group’s centrifugal force. World-weary beyond his years, Adams’ lyrics, sung in an achingly tender drawl, brought admirers by the truckload. Meanwhile, his offstage antics — many of which included a whiskey bottle and provided fodder for new material — drove his bandmates away.

I have a soft spot for self-medicated, despairing guitar players. My record collection boasts albums by the best of them — Townes Van Zandt, Alex Chilton, Gram Parsons. But I’d never heard someone so young who could reach me so easily. Adams’ voice was a lifesaver tossed from a raft just as I thought I was going under. He rescued me.

So I stayed in Memphis and wrote and drank and listened to music, and Adams eventually quit Whiskeytown (the band’s final album, Pneumonia, was recorded in 1999 but wasn’t released until this year) and embarked on a very successful solo career. He left his native North Carolina for Nashville, then New York, then Los Angeles, a series of travails beautifully documented on Heartbreaker, his 2000 solo debut. “I miss my family,” he sings on “Oh My Sweet Carolina,” “All the sweetest winds/They blow across the South.” Pop songs and power ballads have replaced the alt-country twang as Adams has matured, yet he remembers what it’s like to be young and alone — songs like “To Be Young (Is to Be Sad, Is to Be High)” and “To Be the One” make it painstakingly clear.

Despite being recorded in Nashville with a bevy of special guests — Gillian Welch and Emmylou Harris among them — Heartbreaker is known as “the New York album” because it deals with a love lost on the streets of that city.

Gold, Adams’ latest release, is called “the Los Angeles album,” the title a reference to “what the buildings and streets look like in L.A. when the sun goes down.”Lyrically, most things haven’t changed. Adams is still putting his heart on the line — and oftentimes getting it busted in the process. The eloquent “La Cienega Just Smiled” conjures up a lovelorn boy who awakens when the sun goes down, only to spend his nights in a bar nursing his broken heart. “Feels so good but damn it makes me hurt,” a familiar refrain in a foreign landscape: Musically, Adams has gone Hollywood.

Heartbreaker laid the path for Gold, so it’s hardly a surprise when the first notes of ’70s-inspired pop come blasting through the speakers. Adams’ ebullience is infectious, particularly on tunes like “Firecracker,” where he moans, “I just wanna burn up hard and bright/I just wanna be your firecracker/And maybe be your baby tonight.” But his style changes as often as the fashions on Rodeo Drive — and his influences are a little too obvious.

On “Answering Bell,” Adams is, well, a dead ringer for Van Morrison, while shades of Elton John, the Rolling Stones, and Neil Young shine through on Gold as well. With Gold, he’s gotten complete freedom, including a major-label deal where he calls the shots. It’s like giving a child a key to the candy store — Adams is so busy tasting everything that he can’t focus on any one variety. Nevertheless, he has the talent — and tenacity — to pull it off, and he will probably even gain fans. There is something for everyone on Gold.

All that aside, Gold is an ambitious and passionate record. And with the album’s closer, “Goodnight Hollywood Blvd.,” Adams ultimately redeems himself. On paper, the lyrics don’t add up to much. But his contemptuous delivery, sparsely backed with piano and strings, evokes a cynicism that belies his fascination with the City of Angels.

According to Adams, the 16 tracks that eventually became Gold display his newfound self-acceptance. “The songs aren’t self-loathing or self-destructive. This record is about making amends with things and really facing them. And it’s more upbeat because I think I’m giving myself some air to breathe,” he revealed in a New York Times interview. “I do think the process of forgiving myself is really evident on this one.”

Adams and I have each traveled a lot of physical — and spiritual — miles since 1997. We’ve both become more comfortable in our respective skins, and our hangovers are fewer and less desperate. Life is good. Oh, I still listen to Townes and Gram — and Whiskeytown, too. But I’ve made amends as well — and like Ryan Adams, I plan to stay Gold.

Categories
News News Feature

KEEPING THE FAITH

The Shelby Baptist Association recently joined a growing number of autonomous Baptist associations and state conventions who feel the need to adopt the Southern Baptist Convention Baptist Faith and Message.

For nearly a quarter of a century Baptists have been in the news fighting about the Bible. Women in ministry, homosexuality and other issues have often been at the forefront of news coverage. But our battle has been over how we read, understand and apply the Bible.

Baptists have consistently maintained “no creed but Christ, no authority but the Bible” until now.

Baptists cherish and defend religious liberty, and deny the right of any secular or religious authority to impose a confession of faith upon a church or body of churches. We honor the principles of soul competency and the priesthood of believers, affirming together both our liberty in Christ and our accountability to each other under the Word of God.

The real issue is whether or not the individual Baptist or local congregation is free to study the Bible. A local pastor was quoted by the Commercial Appeal as saying “There is only one interpretation of scripture with various applications.” Truth, properly understood, has a primary focus. A proposition and its denial cannot both be equally true. In other words, there may be only one fully intended meaning to a passage of Scripture.

The problem comes when we associate our interpretation with the correct interpretation of a passage. No conscientious believer would knowingly and willingly espouse heresy. But because of our fallen condition we can never assume that we have full and final understanding of the truth. This does not mean we should be silent but rather that we should be humble — realizing that we are capable of being wrong and misunderstand the meaning or intent of a passage of Scripture.

From an historic Baptist perspective, the various creeds and confessions of the larger Christian community (and even various Baptist confessions of faith) are valuable not as an end in themselves but as continuing witness to the Church’s understanding of what the core of the “faith once for all delivered unto the saints” really is.

Creeds and confession are imperfect and fallible documents and therefore should never be given final authority over conscience or belief. These documents are “approximations” of spiritual truth. They are culturally and historically conditioned. “God has much truth and light yet to shine forth from his word.” according to Baptist forefather John Hewlys.

It is because we are not able to know with absolute certainty that our interpretation of biblical doctrine is in every detail fully in conformity with the mind and will of God that we are cautious in clamming too much for our confessions of faith. Baptists would rather hold imperfectly to the final truth and authority of the Bible than to hold perfectly to an imperfect human summary of Divine truth.

Those who want every thing in black and white with easy answers to all questions will not be comfortable with this. A pastor friend told me that we couldn’t just depend on the Bible as our standard because there are so many different interpretations of the Bible out there. So the BFM keeps us from the myriad of interpretative voices and removes the wiggle room from our doctrinal expression.

Unfortunately it also removes the mystery. Biblical interpretation is messy. The Bible is a dangerous word. It doesn’t always comfort. Nor does it readily conform to our agendas, needs and selfish interpretations. The question is not do we have the message of the Bible, the question is does the biblical message have us.

The Bible must be allowed to be a living word that will confront, challenge, provoke and change us. When we think we’ve got it down in a simple confessional statement we are deceiving ourselves. Baptists have historically had too much appreciation for the Bible to allow any human confession or creed to come between us and the Word of God. The temptation to do so is a danger in Baptist life and polity we should avoid.

(Dr. L. Joseph Rojas is pastor of Union Avenue Baptist Church.This article has been abridged for the lay reader.)

Categories
Music Music Features

After the Gold Rush

I fell in love with Ryan Adams the moment I first heard his voice. It was in the early fall of ’97 and I was driving down Highway 61, 50 miles south of Memphis. I popped in a mix tape someone had mailed me, and Adams’ voice suddenly filled my car: “I try not to think/’Cause if I sit and drink/Then I’ll go crazy.” I cranked up the volume, wanting more: “In the daytime I’m lonesome/In the nighttime I’m sad.”

Pulling off the highway, I scanned the homemade tape cover — the song was called “Desperate Ain’t Lonely,” and the name of the band was Whiskeytown. I listened, rewound the tape, listened again. And when I quit crying enough that I could see the road through my windshield, I headed to the nearest liquor store.

Two musician friends of mine had died that summer, and I was alone, drifting from my many friends who couldn’t possibly — in my mind — comprehend what I had lost. This band, and the boy who led it, Ryan Adams, a man-child really — he was 20 when he cut Whiskeytown’s Faithless Street, which included “Desperate Ain’t Lonely” — knew what I felt. They knew it and he sang it, for me and for all the brokenhearted souls.

When I sobered up, I did some research on Whiskeytown. They had two albums out, Faithless Street and the brooding Stranger’s Almanac, both refreshing additions to the then-burgeoning alt-country scene. Ryan Adams — who alleged that Whiskeytown was his second choice for a band name; he preferred Sin City — was the frontman and the group’s centrifugal force. World-weary beyond his years, Adams’ lyrics, sung in an achingly tender drawl, brought admirers by the truckload. Meanwhile, his offstage antics — many of which included a whiskey bottle and provided fodder for new material — drove his bandmates away.

I have a soft spot for self-medicated, despairing guitar players. My record collection boasts albums by the best of them — Townes Van Zandt, Alex Chilton, Gram Parsons. But I’d never heard someone so young who could reach me so easily. Adams’ voice was a lifesaver tossed from a raft just as I thought I was going under. He rescued me.

So I stayed in Memphis and wrote and drank and listened to music, and Adams eventually quit Whiskeytown (the band’s final album, Pneumonia, was recorded in 1999 but wasn’t released until this year) and embarked on a very successful solo career. He left his native North Carolina for Nashville, then New York, then Los Angeles, a series of travails beautifully documented on Heartbreaker, his 2000 solo debut. “I miss my family,” he sings on “Oh My Sweet Carolina,” “All the sweetest winds/They blow across the South.” Pop songs and power ballads have replaced the alt-country twang as Adams has matured, yet he remembers what it’s like to be young and alone — songs like “To Be Young (Is to Be Sad, Is to Be High)” and “To Be the One” make it painstakingly clear.

Despite being recorded in Nashville with a bevy of special guests — Gillian Welch and Emmylou Harris among them — Heartbreaker is known as “the New York album” because it deals with a love lost on the streets of that city. Gold, Adams’ latest release, is called “the Los Angeles album,” the title a reference to “what the buildings and streets look like in L.A. when the sun goes down.”

Lyrically, most things haven’t changed. Adams is still putting his heart on the line — and oftentimes getting it busted in the process. The eloquent “La Cienega Just Smiled” conjures up a lovelorn boy who awakens when the sun goes down, only to spend his nights in a bar nursing his broken heart. “Feels so good but damn it makes me hurt,” a familiar refrain in a foreign landscape: Musically, Adams has gone Hollywood.

Heartbreaker laid the path for Gold, so it’s hardly a surprise when the first notes of ’70s-inspired pop come blasting through the speakers. Adams’ ebullience is infectious, particularly on tunes like “Firecracker,” where he moans, “I just wanna burn up hard and bright/I just wanna be your firecracker/And maybe be your baby tonight.” But his style changes as often as the fashions on Rodeo Drive — and his influences are a little too obvious.

On “Answering Bell,” Adams is, well, a dead ringer for Van Morrison, while shades of Elton John, the Rolling Stones, and Neil Young shine through on Gold as well. With Gold, he’s gotten complete freedom, including a major-label deal where he calls the shots. It’s like giving a child a key to the candy store — Adams is so busy tasting everything that he can’t focus on any one variety. Nevertheless, he has the talent — and tenacity — to pull it off, and he will probably even gain fans. There is something for everyone on Gold.

All that aside, Gold is an ambitious and passionate record. And with the album’s closer, “Goodnight Hollywood Blvd.,” Adams ultimately redeems himself. On paper, the lyrics don’t add up to much. But his contemptuous delivery, sparsely backed with piano and strings, evokes a cynicism that belies his fascination with the City of Angels.

According to Adams, the 16 tracks that eventually became Gold display his newfound self-acceptance. “The songs aren’t self-loathing or self-destructive. This record is about making amends with things and really facing them. And it’s more upbeat because I think I’m giving myself some air to breathe,” he revealed in a New York Times interview. “I do think the process of forgiving myself is really evident on this one.”

Adams and I have each traveled a lot of physical — and spiritual — miles since 1997. We’ve both become more comfortable in our respective skins, and our hangovers are fewer and less desperate. Life is good. Oh, I still listen to Townes and Gram — and Whiskeytown, too. But I’ve made amends as well — and like Ryan Adams, I plan to stay Gold.

You can contact Andria Lisle at letters@memphisflyer.com.

Ryan Adams

Young Avenue Deli

Wednesday, November 7th

Categories
News News Feature

KEEPING THE FAITH

The Shelby Baptist Association recently joined a growing number of autonomous Baptist associations and state conventions who feel the need to adopt the Southern Baptist Convenion Baptist Faith and Message.

Baptists don’t believe in evolution. But we appear to be practicing it. For nearly a quarter of a century Baptists have been in the news fighting about the Bible. Women in ministry, homosexuality and other issues have often been at the forefront of news coverage. But our battle has been over how we read, understand and apply the Bible.

Most Baptists are culturally conservative. Even the moderate Cooperative Baptist Fellowship has issued a formal statement stating that “the foundation of a Christian sexual ethic is faithfulness in marriage between a man and a woman and celibacy in singleness. We also believe in the love and grace of God for all people, both for those who live by this understanding of the biblical standard and those who do not.”

In other words, homosexual behavior, divorce, adultery and any other relationship that falls short of the “one man, one woman for life” ideal involves sin. Many Baptist churches are welcoming of homosexuals — in the sense that the church welcomes all sinners, but few would be affirming of homosexual behavior as compatible with a Christian lifestyle.

Moderate Baptists have made much more noise about openness to women in ministry but actually have very few women serving as senior pastors (which is the actual focus of the Baptist Faith and Message statement limiting the office of pastor to men, as qualified by scripture.) The debate among Baptists is more over whether or not this is merely a local church issue. Southern Baptist leadership has said clearly it is not.

Many might question then what’s the issue? Aren’t two very conservative groups in the Baptist family simply quibbling over theological technicalities that have all the appeal of the medieval argument over how many angels can fit on the head of a pin.

Baptists have consistently maintained “no creed but Christ, no authority but the Bible” until now.

Baptists cherish and defend religious liberty, and deny the right of any secular or religious authority to impose a confession of faith upon a church or body of churches. We honor the principles of soul competency and the priesthood of believers, affirming together both our liberty in Christ and our accountability to each other under the Word of God.

The real issue is whether or not the individual Baptist or local congregation is free to study the Bible. A local pastor was quoted by the Commercial Appeal as saying “There is only one interpretation of scripture with various applications.” Truth, properly understood, has a primary focus. A proposition and its denial cannot both be equally true. In other words, there may be only one fully intended meaning to a passage of Scripture.

The problem comes when we associate our interpretation with the correct interpretation of a passage. No conscientious believer would knowingly and willingly espouse heresy. But because of our fallen condition we can never assume that we have full and final understanding of the truth. This does not mean we should be silent but rather that we should be humble — realizing that we are capable of being wrong and misunderstand the meaning or intent of a passage of Scripture.

From an historic Baptist perspective, the various creeds and confessions of the larger Christian community (and even various Baptist confessions of faith) are valuable not as an end in themselves but as continuing witness to the Church’s understanding of what the core of the “faith once for all delivered unto the saints” really is.

Creeds and confession are imperfect and fallible documents and therefore should never be given final authority over conscience or belief. These documents are “approximations” of spiritual truth. They are culturally and historically conditioned. “God has much truth and light yet to shine forth from his word.” according to Baptist forefather John Hewlys.

It is because we are not able to know with absolute certainty that our interpretation of biblical doctrine is in every detail fully in conformity with the mind and will of God that we are cautious in clamming too much for our confessions of faith. Baptists would rather hold imperfectly to the final truth and authority of the Bible than to hold perfectly to an imperfect human summary of Divine truth.

Those who want every thing in black and white with easy answers to all questions will not be comfortable with this. A pastor friend told me that we couldn’t just depend on the Bible as our standard because there are so many different interpretations of the Bible out there. So the BFM keeps us from the myriad of interpretative voices and removes the wiggle room from our doctrinal expression.

Unfortunately it also removes the mystery. Biblical interpretation is messy. The Bible is a dangerous word. It doesn’t always comfort. Nor does it readily conform to our agendas, needs and selfish interpretations. The question is not do we have the message of the Bible, the question is does the biblical message have us.

The Bible must be allowed to be a living word that will confront, challenge, provoke and change us. When we think we’ve got it down in a simple confessional statement we are deceiving ourselves. Baptists have historically had too much appreciation for the Bible to allow any human confession or creed to come between us and the Word of God. The temptation to do so is a danger in Baptist life and polity we should avoid.

(Dr. L. Joseph Rojas is pastor of Union Avenue Baptist Church.This article has been abridged for the lay reader.)

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

MEMPHIS LOSES TO UAB, 17-14

Disappointing.

Heart-breaking.

Typical.

In a losing effort against the University of Alabama-Birmingham, Memphis watched its 2001 bowl hopes slip away as Ryan White’s 41 yard field goal attempt was blocked.

The play highlighted an afternoon of lost opportunities and inspired UAB defensive efforts as the Tigers lost to the Blazers, 17-14. “This hurts,” Memphis coach Tommy West said after the game. “This hurts bad. We put everything we had into this.”

But that just wasn’t enough. “There comes a time in any game, especially the big ones, when you have to make some plays and we made some plays down the stretch. You couldn’t have scripted a better fourth quarter, but we couldn’t knock it in and get the touchdown offensively,” West said. “We didn’t do things at the end that we had to do to win the ballgame.”

Memphis’ offense just had no gas this day with running back Dante Brown struggling against UAB’s rush defense. Brown compiled only 55 yards on 20 carries. He would run in a Memphis touchdown in the first half.

Passing, Memphis’ first and second options at quarterback, Danny Wimprine and Travis Anglin, fared worse. Wimprine threw 19 times with only 7 completions and 2 interceptions. Anglin did not complete a pass, and ran for Ð2 yards. However, the poor performance by the first and second strings allowed fifth year senior quarterback Neil Suber to take center stage. Suber put together an impressive 11-18 passing performance, accumulating 93 yards and a touchdown in the fourth quarter to Memphis tight end Jeff Cameron. The effort at least gave the Memphis offense a chance for the last minute field goal.

“I’ve been saying that Neil would get his shot,” West said. “I think he did a nice job of looking off their defenders. If you stare down their defenders, then they’re going that way. He stared them down and turned on his back side to find receivers and just delivered the ball.”

Amassing a hundred yards less in offense, UAB relied on the running and passing of quarterback Thomas Cox. Cox, a second stringer starting in the place of injured UAB starter Jeff Aaron threw the ball 19 times for six completions and 50 yards but also ran the ball for a total of 43 yards and a touchdown from two yards out. Also rushing the ball for UAB was running back Jegil Dugger who ran 19 times for 61 yards. UAB running back Kendal Gibson ran for only 10 yards for the game. But two of those yards were enough for UAB’s other rushing touchdown. UAB’s field goal came from kicker Neil Hayes from 48 yards out.

The loss puts Memphis at 4-4 overall and 2-3 in C-USA standings. Next week is a bye for the Tigers before they travel to the University of Tennessee, Knoxville on November 10. “We need it,” West said of the bye. “I don’t know if physically we are all that banged up, but emotionally we need the time off.”

Categories
News News Feature

HARSH REALITY TV

You will be at your breakfast table, and you will not be able to turn away from the images. An American, impossibly young and healthy, will be looking back at you. The lighting will be bad. but you will see the bruises on his face, the redness in his eyes. Sweat glistening on the shaven head. A soldier, he will be in his government issued brown undershirt. Stripped of his flack-jacket and tunic. Stripped of his bluster and bravado, you will see his fear.

He will speak words that are not his own. His statement will sound bizarre delivered with his Midwestern dialect. The word order askew. The eyes darting and the delivery halting as if coached along from outside the frame.

When he is finished with his confession the video image will shake and then come to rest on another man. An Afghan wearing the dark wrappings and headdress of the Taliban. Speaking excitedly in his own language for a moment. And when he is through with his address he will move across the drab room towards the American, who will be seated and bound. The Afghan will be holding a long, curved knife.

And the image before you at your breakfast table will change to the female on the sofa at the network. She will be visibly shaken, aided by several minutes of discussions with her producer on just the right tone to portray when the video ends. The male on the sofa will explain that for reasons of “sensitivity” the network decided to edit the video and he will confirm that the young Ranger was indeed executed slowly and painfully on camera. His eyes will moisten. Fade to commercial.

A car company will tell you that in this time of national difficulty they are here to help with 0.0 percent financing.

None of the networks will show the throat cutting itself. For that, one will have to go to any of a number of websites that will let you download it, stream it, or access video capture still images.

Don’t think this will happen? DonÕt be so sure.

The Afghanistan Mujahadin that fought the Russian Army in the 1980’s turned on their video cameras and slit the throats of many a young Russian soldier, sending the tapes to the enemy. They did it to demoralize, to horrify. The Taliban seems to prefer the hanging of it’s victims from cranes and towers, or big, outdoor, public executions and punitve amputations, but that might be a tough stage direction inside an underground bunker.

Sheik Mullah Mohammed Umar, the leader of the Taliban (to call him “spiritual leader” as many do is to marginalize his importance), is fixated on what he feels is the lack of American will to accept losses. Time and again he has brought up Somalia, where a dead American Army Ranger was dragged through the streets of Mogadishu and American viewers got to see the bound, broken body piped into their living rooms. The U.S. pulled out of the country soon after. Umar and his ilk are now awaiting their chance to provide the American viewing audience with an even more graphic postcard from abroad.

One imagines Sheik Umar and Osama bin Ladin must be amazed by the bully pulpit they have at their disposal. Either must know that any statement they make will be broadcast to the American people soon after, without any checking of the verity of the allegations or censoring of the threats or indictments of the U.S. government or it’s military. When the U.S. National Security Advisor spoke with the network heads and asked them to police themselves and use restraint when broadcasting across the country unedited footage from the leaders of our enemies, as it is clear there exist unknown numbers of their followers hidden among us, it was portrayed by many in the media as an attack on the freedom of the press and heavy-handed White House bullying. Do you think that a tape of the President of the United States rushed to the news channels would be put on the air without any review or editing? Not a chance.

Score one for the bad guys.

So, let’s accept that the Taliban will execute a military prisoner on camera. Who is to say the media will air it?

Anyone who saw the footage of the dead Ranger in his under shorts being pulled behind the truck in Somalia, which is to say anyone who owned a television set in October of 1993, knows the American media has no overwhelming aversion to airing American military casualties, no matter how brutally displayed.

Anyone who saw the footage of the American and British aircrews captured by the Iraqis in the Gulf War, which is to say anyone who owned a television in February of 1991, knows the American media has no moral difficulties broadcasting enemy propaganda spewed from the mouths of injured and threatened captives.

Put these events together in one video and what do you have?

Must see TV.

To call the American media accessory to whatever crime they put on their news programs is, admittedly, overstating it a bit. The Taliban will execute whomever they choose to execute whether or not we get to watch it over a bowl of corn flakes. But a public outcry against any airing of prisoner videos, no matter what the situation, before the fact would send a message to the networks that the public will not allow themselves to be subjected to a propaganda war at the expense of a young man’s life or a family’s unimaginable horror. And a solitary voice from the U.S. television networks to Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based “all Taliban, all the time” news station that has the most contact with Umar and his minions would tell the powers that are soon not to be in Kabul that any Rangers they have in their cells may have to die alone in the dark but will not be used as publicity shills to promote the myriad dangers of messing with Afghan warriors.

Afghanistan must be a miserable place to die. Rudyard Kipling wrote of the perils of fighting there in the early 1840’s, in a war that claimed 12,000 British fighters.

“When you’re wounded and left, On Afghanistan’s plains, And the women come out, To cut up your remains, Just roll on your rifle, And blow out your brains, And go to your Gawd, Like a soldier.” Kipling’s soldier surely could not appreciate how lucky he was, as 160 years later a condemned young man may well be used as an unwitting pawn in the powerful war of propaganda and thus have his last terrible moments documented for sick posterity under the justification of reporting the news.

(Mark Greaney is an international-account manager at Sofamor Danek).

Categories
News News Feature

HARSH REALITY TV

You will be at your breakfast table, and you will not be able to turn away from the images. An American, impossibly young and healthy, will be looking back at you. The lighting will be bad. but you will see the bruises on his face, the redness in his eyes. Sweat glistening on the shaven head. A soldier, he will be in his government issued brown undershirt. Stripped of his flack-jacket and tunic. Stripped of his bluster and bravado, you will see his fear.

He will speak words that are not his own. His statement will sound bizarre delivered with his Midwestern dialect. The word order askew. The eyes darting and the delivery halting as if coached along from outside the frame.

When he is finished with his confession the video image will shake and then come to rest on another man. An Afghan wearing the dark wrappings and headdress of the Taliban. Speaking excitedly in his own language for a moment. And when he is through with his address he will move across the drab room towards the American, who will be seated and bound. The Afghan will be holding a long, curved knife.

And the image before you at your breakfast table will change to the female on the sofa at the network. She will be visibly shaken, aided by several minutes of discussions with her producer on just the right tone to portray when the video ends. The male on the sofa will explain that for reasons of “sensitivity” the network decided to edit the video and he will confirm that the young Ranger was indeed executed slowly and painfully on camera. His eyes will moisten. Fade to commercial.

A car company will tell you that in this time of national difficulty they are here to help with 0.0 percent financing.

None of the networks will show the throat cutting itself. For that, one will have to go to any of a number of websites that will let you download it, stream it, or access video capture still images.

Don’t think this will happen? DonÕt be so sure.

The Afghanistan Mujahadin that fought the Russian Army in the 1980’s turned on their video cameras and slit the throats of many a young Russian soldier, sending the tapes to the enemy. They did it to demoralize, to horrify. The Taliban seems to prefer the hanging of it’s victims from cranes and towers, or big, outdoor, public executions and punitve amputations, but that might be a tough stage direction inside an underground bunker.

Sheik Mullah Mohammed Umar, the leader of the Taliban (to call him “spiritual leader” as many do is to marginalize his importance), is fixated on what he feels is the lack of American will to accept losses. Time and again he has brought up Somalia, where a dead American Army Ranger was dragged through the streets of Mogadishu and American viewers got to see the bound, broken body piped into their living rooms. The U.S. pulled out of the country soon after. Umar and his ilk are now awaiting their chance to provide the American viewing audience with an even more graphic postcard from abroad.

One imagines Sheik Umar and Osama bin Ladin must be amazed by the bully pulpit they have at their disposal. Either must know that any statement they make will be broadcast to the American people soon after, without any checking of the verity of the allegations or censoring of the threats or indictments of the U.S. government or it’s military. When the U.S. National Security Advisor spoke with the network heads and asked them to police themselves and use restraint when broadcasting across the country unedited footage from the leaders of our enemies, as it is clear there exist unknown numbers of their followers hidden among us, it was portrayed by many in the media as an attack on the freedom of the press and heavy-handed White House bullying. Do you think that a tape of the President of the United States rushed to the news channels would be put on the air without any review or editing? Not a chance.

Score one for the bad guys.

So, let’s accept that the Taliban will execute a military prisoner on camera. Who is to say the media will air it?

Anyone who saw the footage of the dead Ranger in his under shorts being pulled behind the truck in Somalia, which is to say anyone who owned a television set in October of 1993, knows the American media has no overwhelming aversion to airing American military casualties, no matter how brutally displayed.

Anyone who saw the footage of the American and British aircrews captured by the Iraqis in the Gulf War, which is to say anyone who owned a television in February of 1991, knows the American media has no moral difficulties broadcasting enemy propaganda spewed from the mouths of injured and threatened captives.

Put these events together in one video and what do you have?

Must see TV.

To call the American media accessory to whatever crime they put on their news programs is, admittedly, overstating it a bit. The Taliban will execute whomever they choose to execute whether or not we get to watch it over a bowl of corn flakes. But a public outcry against any airing of prisoner videos, no matter what the situation, before the fact would send a message to the networks that the public will not allow themselves to be subjected to a propaganda war at the expense of a young man’s life or a family’s unimaginable horror. And a solitary voice from the U.S. television networks to Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based “all Taliban, all the time” news station that has the most contact with Umar and his minions would tell the powers that are soon not to be in Kabul that any Rangers they have in their cells may have to die alone in the dark but will not be used as publicity shills to promote the myriad dangers of messing with Afghan warriors.

Afghanistan must be a miserable place to die. Rudyard Kipling wrote of the perils of fighting there in the early 1840’s, in a war that claimed 12,000 British fighters.

“When you’re wounded and left, On Afghanistan’s plains, And the women come out, To cut up your remains, Just roll on your rifle, And blow out your brains, And go to your Gawd, Like a soldier.” Kipling’s soldier surely could not appreciate how lucky he was, as 160 years later a condemned young man may well be used as an unwitting pawn in the powerful war of propaganda and thus have his last terrible moments documented for sick posterity under the justification of reporting the news.

(Mark Greaney is an international-account manager at Sofamor Danek).

Categories
News News Feature

HOW IT LOOKS

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

GRIZZLIES DROP EXHIBITION FINALE

PORTLAND, Oregon (CNNSI Ticker) — Ruben Patterson collected 25 points and 10 rebounds and Derek Anderson added 23 points as the Portland Trail Blazers rallied for a 101-88 victory over the Memphis Grizzlies in the exhibition finale for both teams.

Memphis (4-4) took a 74-67 lead into the fourth quarter before a three-point play by Rasheed Wallace triggered a 9-0 run for a 76-74 lead with 8:52 to go.

A basket by Grant Long gave the Grizzlies their final lead at 82-80 with just under seven minutes to play. But Patterson and rookie Ruben Boumjte Boumjte each had four points in a 15-0 run that gave the Trail Blazers (4-3) a 95-82 lead and sent them to their third straight preseason victory.

Wallace scored 19 points and made all six foul shots but Scottie Pippen did not score and grabbed only one rebound in 25 minutes. Erick Barkley and Rick Brunson combined for 10 points and 10 assists off the bench.

Lorenzen Wright scored 19 points and Nick Anderson chipped in 15 as the Grizzlies placed all five starters in double figures. Jason Williams finished with 14 points and 13 assists despite 5-of-15 shooting.

Rookie Pau Gasol had 12 points and seven rebounds in 37 minutes for Memphis, which ended the preseason with four straight losses. Shane Battier, the sixth pick in the draft, played virtually the entire game and made 4-of-13 shots for 14 points and grabbed four rebounds.

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

MEMPHIS LOSES TO UAB, 17-14

Disappointing.

Heart-breaking.

Typical.

In a losing effort against the University of Alabama-Birmingham, Memphis watched its 2001 bowl hopes slip away as Ryan White’s 41 yard field goal attempt was blocked.

The play highlighted an afternoon of lost opportunities and inspired UAB defensive efforts as the Tigers lost to the Blazers, 17-14. “This hurts,” Memphis coach Tommy West said after the game. “This hurts bad. We put everything we had into this.”

But that just wasn’t enough. “There comes a time in any game, especially the big ones, when you have to make some plays and we made some plays down the stretch. You couldn’t have scripted a better fourth quarter, but we couldn’t knock it in and get the touchdown offensively,” West said. “We didn’t do things at the end that we had to do to win the ballgame.”

Memphis’ offense just had no gas this day with running back Dante Brown struggling against UAB’s rush defense. Brown compiled only 55 yards on 20 carries. He would run in a Memphis touchdown in the first half.

Passing, Memphis’ first and second options at quarterback, Danny Wimprine and Travis Anglin, fared worse. Wimprine threw 19 times with only 7 completions and 2 interceptions. Anglin did not complete a pass, and ran for Ð2 yards. However, the poor performance by the first and second strings allowed fifth year senior quarterback Neil Suber to take center stage. Suber put together an impressive 11-18 passing performance, accumulating 93 yards and a touchdown in the fourth quarter to Memphis tight end Jeff Cameron. The effort at least gave the Memphis offense a chance for the last minute field goal.

“I’ve been saying that Neil would get his shot,” West said. “I think he did a nice job of looking off their defenders. If you stare down their defenders, then they’re going that way. He stared them down and turned on his back side to find receivers and just delivered the ball.”

Amassing a hundred yards less in offense, UAB relied on the running and passing of quarterback Thomas Cox. Cox, a second stringer starting in the place of injured UAB starter Jeff Aaron threw the ball 19 times for six completions and 50 yards but also ran the ball for a total of 43 yards and a touchdown from two yards out. Also rushing the ball for UAB was running back Jegil Dugger who ran 19 times for 61 yards. UAB running back Kendal Gibson ran for only 10 yards for the game. But two of those yards were enough for UAB’s other rushing touchdown. UAB’s field goal came from kicker Neil Hayes from 48 yards out.

The loss puts Memphis at 4-4 overall and 2-3 in C-USA standings. Next week is a bye for the Tigers before they travel to the University of Tennessee, Knoxville on November 10. “We need it,” West said of the bye. “I don’t know if physically we are all that banged up, but emotionally we need the time off.”