Author: Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout

Tennesseans Seeking Food Aid Stuck in Months-Long Backlogs

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date December 19, 2023

Jasmine Bryant was caught by surprise at the grocery store in September, when a state-issued debit card to buy food for her three kids was rejected at the checkout counter.

Her SNAP benefits — formerly referred to as food stamps — had been cut off without notice, despite no change in the circumstances that allow her family of four to access the nutritional help.

Bryant made multiple calls to the Tennessee Department of Human Services helpline, where hold times stretch to four hours and hang-ups are a frequent occurrence. An online application system was often down. And at a nearby local Knoxville benefits office, where many of the electronic kiosks were out of order and in-person windows were closed, there were hours-long waits, rude staff and security guards, and few answers.

It would be another three months before the Bryant family was restored to the program that allows the single mom to buy fresh fruits, vegetables and protein for her active, sports-playing kids — ages 13, 11 and 8.

“I did everything I could to make sure the kids didn’t know what was going on,” said Bryant, 35. “But they noticed. They’re used to me cooking home-cooked meals and fresh food that you can’t really get from food banks. It made me feel like a failure.” Jasmine Bryant, 35, lost access to state food benefits for three months due to backlogs at the Tennessee Department of Human Services.

The family’s benefits, Bryant would learn, had been cut off in error.

As the holiday season approaches, thousands of Tennessee families who qualify for food assistance have been cut off from food benefits they rely on; families recently out of a job or falling on hard times haven’t been able to successfully access first-time aid.

State officials blame the rollout of a new computer system in June and an ongoing staffing shortage.

“This year, the Tennessee Department of Human Services experienced its largest technology transition since 1992,” Danielle Cotton, department spokesperson, said. “As we transition from the old system to the new one, there has been a temporary increase in our processing times that we are actively working to mitigate.”

Advocates for Tennessee children and families question why the computer rollout was so poorly launched and note frustrations for families are compounded by widespread reports of mistreatment by state employees.

“It’s really hard. The reason why people are turning to SNAP is because they’re having a hard time feeding themselves or their families. It’s a lifeline,” said Signe Anderson, senior director of nutrition advocacy for the Tennessee Justice Center.

Anderson said last week that the problems identified months ago haven’t gotten any better for families, who have turned to community organizations like hers for assistance. Applicants have reported chaos inside DHS offices, she said: Senior citizens have waited in lines of 150 or more that stretch outside offices into the cold; security guards, at times, have called police about applicants who expressed frustrations; state employees have refused to use translations services for non-English speaking individuals.

“DHS calls individuals applying for SNAP their ‘customers,’ but we’ve seen none of the respect and dignity in treating people here,” Anderson said.

Cotton said the agency is also working to recruit and retain staff, offering accelerated training to new hires who work on the SNAP program. Cotton did not immediately respond to a request last week for vacancy numbers in its SNAP program.

Six months after the the agency installed the new computer system, thousands of low-income Tennesseans remain in limbo. As of November 30, there were 48,690 SNAP applications pending, according to DHS.

Approximately 40 percent of the applications have been stuck in the system for more than a month, despite a federal rules that require states to process applications within 30 days. Cotton noted that not all pending applications are from people who will ultimately qualify for SNAP: one in five applications are denied, she said.

The backlog in processing applications spiked in June, when the state replaced and modernized computer systems. By July, more than 73,000 individuals — mostly children — lost access to food benefits in a single month, a notable drop in a program that sees routine fluctuations in the numbers of individuals receiving benefits.

The department also changed its once-yearly benefits review of people currently receiving SNAP to once every six months, adding further stressors to the system, Anderson said.

In many cases, families that applied for the benefit without getting an answer simply reapplied, adding to the volume of cases for agency review. Between June and November, more than 40 percent of applications were duplicates, according to DHS.

For those like Bryant, who already have SNAP that are now subject to a new six-month review, upwards of 500 people have been waiting more than a month to get their benefits reviewed, agency data shows.

“If it hadn’t been for two food banks and people in my community looking out for me, I don’t know what I would have done,” said Bryant.

Bryant is also enrolled in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, taking required workforce training classes — a chance at a future career that would be lost should she take a job now.

“I’m doing everything I can to try and make a better way,” she said. “DHS has always been bad, but never this bad. I know the staff has to feel overwhelmed, but I don’t understand why they had to make this so hard.”

Tennessee Lookout is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Tennessee Lookout maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Holly McCall for questions: info@tennesseelookout.com. Follow Tennessee Lookout on Facebook and Twitter.

Tags food bank, food insecurity, Memphis, SNAP, Tennessee Department of Human Services

News News Blog News Feature

Tennessee Prison Population Grows As Violent Crime Drops Steeply

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date December 5, 2023

After years of steady declines, Tennessee’s prison population climbed by nearly eight percent last year, a bump in the rate of incarceration that surpassed all but three other states during a period of time that also saw steep drops in the most serious crimes.

Tennessee added 1,615 more men and 125 more women to its roster of state prisoners in 2022, according to newly released data from the U.S. Department of Justice. Only Mississippi, Colorado, and Montana experienced greater gains.

By the end of 2022, there were 23,735 state inmates in Tennessee; the data does not include the population in county jails, which hold individuals for misdemeanor offenses and those awaiting trial.

Criminal justice reform advocates said they were disheartened but unsurprised by the data.

“Everything that we said was going to come true has come true,” said Dawn Harrington, executive director of Free Hearts, a nonprofit that advocates for incarcerated and formerly incarcerated individuals.

Among the drivers, Harrington believes, is Tennessee’s so-called truth-in-sentencing law, which took effect midway through 2022. The law requires heightened minimum sentences for a host of offenses.

The COVID epidemic also ushered in a series of social and economic challenges — among them unemployment, limited access to mental health resources and widening disparities in education and healthcare. All are “predetermining factors” that may also explain why more men and women wound up behind bars, she said.

The Tennessee Department of Correction did not respond Friday to questions about factors state officials believe are driving the growth in Tennessee’s prison population.

Tennessee incarcerated more people in 2022 despite a drop in crime. The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation reported incidents of murder, rape, and kidnapping decreased by double digits last year.

2022 Tennessee crime rates. Source: Tennessee Bureau of Investigation

Data that could shed light on the number of imprisoned people who received lengthier sentences as a result of last year’s truth-in-sentencing law was not immediately available last week.

The law was enacted over the objections of Gov. Bill Lee, who said he was concerned about “unintended consequences.”

“Widespread evidence suggests that this policy will result in more victims, higher recidivism, increased crime and prison overcrowding, all with an increased cost to taxpayers,” Lee said in a letter to House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Lt. Gov. Randy McNally before the legislation was enacted.

“If we need to build more prisons, we can,” Sexton responded at the time.

Lee, nevertheless, declined to veto the law, allowing it to take effect without his signature.

Tags Bill Lee, Cameron Sexton, Memphis, Prison Population, Tennessee, violent crime

News News Blog News Feature

Tennessee AG Leads Fight Against Federal Protections for LGBTQ Foster Youth

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date December 1, 2023

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti. (Photo: John Partipilo)

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti is leading a coalition of 17 states in fighting a proposed federal rule intended to give LGBTQ kids greater protections in foster care.

The proposed rule reflects misguided federal policy, illegally intrudes on state authority and risks violating the free speech and religion rights of foster parents and organizations that provide care to kids in state custody, a letter sent Monday U.S. Department of Health & Human Services from Skrmetti and 16 of his counterparts in other states said.

“It also hampers the ability of the states to protect kids by forcing children’s services agencies to police pronoun usage with the same urgency they address physical abuse,” Skrmetti said in a statement released Wednesday.

Announced in September by the Biden Administration, the proposed new rule would require state child welfare agencies to ensure LGBTQ+ kids in state custody are “protected from mistreatment related to their sexual orientation or gender identity, where their caregivers have received special training on how to meet their needs, and where they can access the services they need to thrive.”

LGBTQ kids are disproportionately represented in foster care across the nation, with some studies suggesting that up to a third of all foster youth identify as LBGTQ — often winding up in state custody as result of mistreatment or rejection based on their gender identity, according to DHHS.

The proposed “placement rule” would require child welfare agencies like the Tennessee Department of Children’s Services to place kids in foster homes, residential treatment centers or group homes that are “free of hostility, mistreatment, or abuse based on the child’s LGBTQI+ status” and with caregivers who have the appropriate knowledge and skills to provide for the needs of a child related to the child’s sexual orientation.

“For example, to be considered a safe and appropriate placement, a provider is expected to utilize the child’s identified pronouns, chosen name, and allow the child to dress in an age-appropriate manner that the child believes reflects their self-identified gender identity and expression,” the rules say.

It would also require caregivers to provide access to “clinically appropriate mental and behavioral health care supportive of their sexual orientation and gender identity and expression as needed.”

That requirement is “particularly problematic,” the letter from attorneys general said.

(A proposed federal rule) also hampers the ability of the states to protect kids by forcing children’s services agencies to police pronoun usage with the same urgency they address physical abuse.

– Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti in a statement

A recently enacted Tennessee law, currently facing a legal challenge in federal court, prohibits a variety of gender-affirming medical care for minors. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block the law during the legal challenge, issuing a ruling that expressed deep reservations about such medical treatments for youth.

“The Placement Rule nonetheless appears to condition … Tennessee’s continued funding on foster parents’ providing certain gender-affirming treatments that it and other States have permissibly banned. Or perhaps HHS would require foster parents to take children on costly out-of-state trips for medical visits and surgeries to avoid designation as “unsafe” foster providers,” the letter said.

The attorneys general also expressed concern the new rules, potentially holding foster parents and state agencies legally liable for failing to follow them, and required new training, could deter people from becoming foster parents, or prompt existing foster parents to leave, adding to an already acute shortage in foster homes. Ultimately, that would harm kids not help them, the letter said.

A Department of Children’s Services spokesperson did not respond to request for information, but published agency guidelines maintained by the federal government show that the agency is one of approximately 39 states that provide explicit protections from harassment and discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Tennessee’s guidelines, however, do not go as far as the proposed federal government’s rules.

“Flexibility is needed for youth participating in activities that would create safe spaces for LGBTQ in foster care,” Tennessee’s guidelines state. “Caregivers should seek assistance and information on resources and opportunities for these youth if not aware of them and seek consultation with the youth’s worker, when needed.”

Skrmetti rule

Tags Foster Care, Jonathan Skrmetti, LGBTQ, Memphis, Tennessee, youth

News News Blog News Feature

Body Cams Mandated for Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Officers

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date November 24, 2023

A Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency vehicle. (Photo: John Partipilo)

Officers with the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency will be required to wear body-worn cameras, joining an increasing number of state and federal law enforcement agencies who police hunting, fishing, and boating laws across the nation that are now required to wear the devices.

Roughly 250 Tennessee officers who routinely interact with the public will be required to wear body cameras, spokesperson Emily Buck said.

The goal of adding cameras is to “promote perceived legitimacy, sense of fairness, and procedural justice the citizens of Tennessee have about TWRA,” read the agency’s grant application to the U.S. Department of Justice, which provided $340,000 start-up funding.

Body-worn cameras have been adopted by numerous traditional law enforcement agencies over the past decade, but only in recent years put into use by sworn officers with the U.S. Department of Interior, Forest Service, and TWRA counterparts in other states who patrol natural areas.

These officers possess the same authority to question, detain, arrest, search and seize as local police and sheriff’s departments, but they have received far less scrutiny in their interactions with the public, which often take place in rural, forested and other natural areas — including waterways — away from public view.

In Tennessee, allegations about TWRA officer misconduct and abuse of power have surfaced in two recent lawsuits.

State wildlife agency sued over secret surveillance on private land

In April, a panel of state judges, ruling in a lawsuit brought by two Benton County property owners, struck down a state law giving TWRA officers the right to search and surveil private property without a warrant —and without notice to property residents or owners.

The panel called TWRA’s practice of conducting warrantless searches and surveillance “unconstitutional, unlawful, and unenforceable” and giving rise to an “intolerable risk of abusive searches.” No other Tennessee state or local agency is explicitly granted the same powers. TWRA is appealing the decision.

In July, a master falconer filed a federal lawsuit against three TWRA law enforcement officers, alleging her constitutional rights were violated when they unlawfully seized 13 birds of prey, phone, computer, video, and other records from her Nashville home in 2022 — an action a Nashville criminal court judge later called “egregious,” “an abuse of the law” and “malicious prosecution.” TWRA officials have denied their officers violated the law.

TWRA is still in the process of implementing body camera usage. Officers have received training and are currently being outfitted with the video and audio capturing devices, Buck said. The DOJ grant covers less than half the initial three-year startup costs of cameras, she said.

All full-time wildlife officers, sergeants, and lieutenants will be issued cameras, which must be activated to record all vehicle and vessel stops, pursuits, calls for service, “detentions, investigations pursuant to an arrest, arrests, suspect interviews,” searches of individuals and during the execution of search warrants — among other circumstances detailed in protocol provided by TWRA.

The protocol provides for exceptions to the requirement to record, including in restrooms or other areas where the public has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Among other exceptions: audio may be muted at an officers discretion while conferring with other law enforcement during a law enforcement action or in other circumstances “based on clearly articulable reasons.”

TWRA’s adoption of body worn cameras comes after numerous state and federal wildlife law enforcement agency have begun requiring them.

In 2019, the United States Forest Service began requiring its officers to wear the cameras. In 2022, the U.S. Department of Interior began requiring its officers to use them, a policy that extends to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service.

Tags body cameras, Memphis, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency

News News Blog News Feature

TN AG Moves to Close NAACP Suit On Voting Rights

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date October 23, 2023

A lingering legal battle that was poised to be settled this summer, leading to a clearer pathway for tens of thousands of Tennesseans to restore their voting rights, has instead reignited into a contentious court fight with no certain outcome ahead of the next presidential election.

One in five Black voting-age Tennesseans lacks the right to vote due to a past criminal conviction — likely the highest rate of African-American disenfranchisement in the nation, according to the Sentencing Project. Overall, nearly 10 percent of the Tennessee electorate — 470,000 people — have lost their right to vote due to convictions.

In a lawsuit filed in December 2020, the Tennessee Conference of the NAACP and five residents denied the right to vote alleged Tennessee officials failed to follow state laws that allow individuals to legally restore their voting rights after serving their sentences and completing parole. Instead, the state implemented inaccessible and opaque processes that impede legal pathways for restoring rights, the lawsuit claimed.

Close to settling key claims in the case over the summer — potentially ahead of high profile local elections in Nashville, Memphis, and for state office — attorneys for the state abruptly broke off talks in late July, catching lawyers for the NAACP by surprise, legal filings show. Then, on August 2nd, lawyers for the Tennessee Attorney General filed motions asking a judge to reject the claims entirely.

Tennessee Supreme Court rules in felony voting rights case
Tennessee Lookout

“The Elections Division, TDOC, and Governor’s office had the opportunity this summer to create accessible, transparent, and uniform procedures to allow the over 470,000 disenfranchised Tennesseans a fair shot at getting their voting rights restored and rejoining their communities as full citizens,” Blair Bowie, an attorney representing the NAACP with the DC-based Campaign Legal Center, said Friday.

“Instead, they blew up the voting rights restoration system entirely and imposed effectively permanent disenfranchisement on July 21st,” she said.

A spokesperson for the Tennessee Attorney General did not respond to emailed questions on Friday.

The breakdown in the federal case came shortly after a June 29th ruling by the Tennessee Supreme Court against Ernest Falls, who was denied the right to vote in Tennessee in 2020 after receiving clemency in Virginia for a decades-old crime.

The Supreme Court ruled that Falls, also represented by the Campaign Legal Center, was required to show he had paid all outstanding court costs, restitution and child support obligations in Virginia to establish his voting rights — in addition to proof of the Virginia clemency.

Secretary of State Mark Goins then issued a memo that incorporated expanded requirements for all state residents seeking to restore their voting rights — regardless of where their conviction took place. In addition to the process of demonstrating they, too, had paid court costs and other financial obligations related to their crime, in-state residents must now show they also “have been pardoned by a Governor, U.S. President, or other appropriate authority of a state or have had their full rights of citizenship restored as prescribed by law.”

The memo wasn’t shared with attorneys for the NAACP who had been involved with them in settlement negotiations for months, legal filings said.

“Plaintiffs learned from public reporting that Defendant Goins had that day issued guidance to county election officials changing his interpretation of the State’s requirements for individuals with felony convictions to restore their voting rights,” court records said.

In seeking a ruling dismissing major elements of the case, state lawyers have argued in motions for summary judgment that the five individuals names in the suit lack standing in court.

Tennessee does have a process in place for restoration of rights, one that provides a pathway to restoring rights while preserving election integrity, they argued.

“Tennessee does not reject all voter registration forms on which the applicant affirmed that they have a felony conviction,” the state’s filings said. “Moreover, Tennessee’s practice is rationally related to its legitimate interest in combatting voter fraud, safeguarding voter confidence, and ensuring accurate record keeping.”

The Sentencing Project’s national voting rights study found that that 3,415 Tennessee voting-age citizens have been granted Certificates of Restoration since 2016 — fewer than 1 percent of those with prior felony convictions estimated to be eligible to vote under Tennessee law.

The NAACP lawsuit argues that the current administration of voting rights restoration certificates violate the U.S. Constitution’s due process and the equal protection rights.

Tags Jonathan Skrmetti, Memphis, NAACP, Tennessee Lookout, voting rights

News News Blog News Feature

Tennessee Leads Nation in Arresting and Punishing Pregnant Women

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date September 21, 2023

Tennessee, Alabama, and South Carolina lead the nation in arresting and criminally punishing women for allegedly posing a danger to their fetuses, according to a report released by advocacy group Pregnancy Justice.

Nationwide, nearly 1,400 people were arrested or subject to disparate bail, sentencing, and probation for conduct related to their pregnancies between 2005 and the U.S. Supreme Court decision in June 2022 dismantling abortion rights, the report found. The vast majority were poor, white women, though poor Black women were disproportionately represented.

Tennessee accounted for 131 of those cases.

“Pregnant people have been criminalized at an accelerating rate for actions that would not be illegal but for a person’s pregnancy,” Lourdes Rivera, president of Pregnancy Justice, told reporters on Tuesday.

The report shows a substantial increase in the number of people being charged for crimes tied to pregnancy. In 2013, Pregnancy Justice released a report that found that law enforcement had targeted 413 pregnant people between 1973 — which marked the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion — and 2005. The new findings show those instances have tripled.

When we talk about back alley or secret abortions, that’s not the real risk to people’s lives.

– Nina Gurek, Healthy and Free Tennessee

Advocates pointed to two key drivers in criminalizing pregnancy: the expansion of so-called fetal rights or “personhood” laws and a more punitive approach to substance use among pregnant women — even as many states move to decriminalize drug abuse in line with evolving approaches to addiction. The majority of criminal cases documented by Pregnancy Justice related to substance use, including marijuana, cocaine, or methamphetamines. In about one-quarter of these cases, the substance was legal: such as nicotine, alcohol, or prescription opiates.

In Tennessee, both factors hold true. Tennessee law says that “life begins at conception.”

In 2014, Tennessee also became the first state in the nation to enact a “fetal assault law.” It allowed women to be prosecuted for drug use during pregnancy. The measure was criticized by state and national health and advocacy groups and was allowed to expire in 2016. Several efforts to reimplement the law have been introduced in the Tennessee Legislature since.

Nina Gurek, policy director for Healthy and Free Tennessee, said that despite the law’s expiration her organization continues to hear of prosecutions involving pregnant women on child abuse or neglect charges involving legal and illegal substance use allegations.

“We know it’s still happening,” she said.

The Pregnancy Justice report warns that more people could face criminal charges or increased bonds or sentencing as states have enacted abortion bans and restrictions.

Tennessee’s strict abortion ban explicitly exempts pregnant women from prosecution for seeking abortions. But Gurek said she places no trust in the law’s protections. “When we talk about back alley or secret abortions, that’s not the real risk to people’s lives, it’s handcuffs.”

Tags abortion, Memphis, pregnancy, Pregnancy Justice, Tennessee General Assembly

News News Blog News Feature

TN AG, ACLU Drop Suit Over House Sign Ban

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date September 14, 2023

State Capitol (Photo: Tennessee State Government)

In a coda to a bruising special session of the Tennessee Legislature that wrapped up last month, lawyers representing three women who silently defied a House ban on signs and attorneys for the state have agreed to bring a First Amendment legal challenge to a close.

The challenge to new House rules that barred protest signs was filed on the third day of Tennessee’s specially called session on public safety — after state troopers removed three women quietly holding pieces of paper that read “1 KID > ALL THE GUNS” from a legislative committee room.

As contentious gatherings and frustrated protestors crowded the legislative session, inside a Nashville courthouse Chancellor Anne Martin immediately granted a temporary restraining order preventing the ban on signs from being enforced. Five days later, Martin ruled again, finding that the sign ban would likely be found unconstitutional at trial. House leaders were unable to enforce the ban for five of the seven days of the special session.

House Republicans lose decision on sign bans

Attorneys for the Tennessee Attorney General, representing House Speaker Cameron Sexton, the Tennessee Highway Patrol and other enforcers of the ban have now asked for the case to be dismissed as moot.

“The special session has now adjourned,” the state’s legal filings said. “And the procedural rules adopted by the House for the special session — including the Sign Regulation that the (women) asked this court to declare unconstitutional and enjoin — are no longer in effect.”

Attorneys for the ACLU of Tennessee, who represented the three women — Allison Polidor, Erica Bowton, and Maryam Abolfazli — do not oppose dismissing the case, but expect to file a motion seeking attorney fees and costs from the state, legal filings said.

The House rule banning signs during the special session originated in a private meeting in Sexton’s office that took place without public notice on the first day of the special session, the Tennessean reported. The 31 pages outlining the special session’s rules relied largely on a template for the House’s permanent rules of order, but added this sentence:

“No voice or noise amplification devices, flags, signs, or banners shall be permitted in the galleries of the House of Representatives.”

The House’s permanent rules of order for the 113th Assembly, which reconvenes in January for the second year of its two-year cycle, do not contain the same sentence.

Tags ACLU-TN, Memphis, special session, Tennessee General Assembly

News News Blog News Feature

Court Promises Swift Ruling on Tennessee Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date September 5, 2023

A federal appeals court has promised a swift decision in a legal challenge to Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming healthcare for minors.

At issue during Friday’s oral arguments, held before a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: whether to set aside a lower court’s temporary block of the law.

The appeals court has already intervened once, on an emergency basis, allowing Tennessee’s law to take effect until they could hear arguments in the case. The intervention, in July, marked the the first time a federal court allowed a ban on gender-affirming care to take effect in the country. Other federal courts have blocked such bans, finding they violated the Equal Protection Clause, Due Process Clause, and First Amendment.

Addressing the court on Friday, Chase Strangio, deputy director for transgender justice at the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Project, argued the law discriminates on the basis of sex. The U.S. government has also intervened in the case on behalf of the Tennessee plaintiffs, who include children receiving gender-affirming care and their parents.

Federal court temporarily halts Tennessee ban on transgender care for minors

Clark L. Hildabrand. deputy chief of staff and senior counsel for the Tennessee Attorney General argued the courts should defer to the legislature.

The court on Friday heard a nearly-identical challenge to a ban on gender-affirming care for minors in Kentucky.

Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, acknowledged he struggled with both cases. Sutton authored the July decision allowing Tennessee’s ban to go into effect.

“I think we have to come to grips with the larger picture — at age 18, this all goes away,” he said. Sutton said he was struck by arguments that withholding treatment for minors can subject them to harm.

“I think this is your strongest argument,” he said, adding that compassion is also needed for those who may later regret receiving care. “I feel like there’s compassion in both directions.”

Tags ACLU, gender affirming care for minors, Memphis

News News Blog News Feature

Report: Firearms Are Leading Cause of Death in Tennessee Kids

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date August 14, 2023

A day after the March 27th mass shooting at The Covenant School, a woman is overcome with emotion in front of an impromptu memorial. (Photo: John Partipilo)

Children are dying at higher rates from gun violence in Tennessee than in the rest of the nation, an ongoing geographic disparity that has only widened in recent years, and one that most gravely impacts the state’s Black families, whose children and teens are being killed by firearms at twice the rate as white kids.

The data tracking child deaths in Tennessee between 2017 and 2021 was released as part of an annual report compiled by the Tennessee Department of Health with the assistance of district attorneys, child welfare advocates, elected officials, and other experts who regularly meet in teams to review the deaths of Tennessee kids year-round.

The report this year was released just ahead of a special legislative session called to address public safety after a lone assailant fired 152 rounds inside a Nashville Christian school, killing three nine-year-old children and three adults in less than 15 minutes, according to police.

The report focuses on all causes of child deaths among kids 17 and younger, finding that the overall mortality rate from all causes — accidents, suicides, premature births, other medical conditions and murder — in Tennessee is nearly twice the national average.

Gun deaths among children, however, have increased by significant rates; by 2021, Tennessee’s rates of firearm deaths among children were more than 36 percent more than the national average.

In 2021, the latest year analyzed, 67 Tennessee children died by homicide. Fifty-three of the victims were Black, a rate four times as high as white children.

“Child health is a critical indicator of a society’s well-being,” the report noted. The burdens of homicide among Tennessee children is higher among Blacks, males, and children aged 15 to 17, with firearms being the leading means of lethality.

The racial disparity is reversed when it comes to children and teens who died by suicide, with white children six times as likely to take their own lives. Suicides accounted for the deaths of 32 white children and five Black children between 2017 and 2021. More than half of all suicide deaths among Tennessee children (54 percent) were a result of firearms.

The report does not make specific recommendations, instead noting two “prevention opportunities”: promoting safer firearms handling and storage and programs encouraging parental supervision.

The prevention opportunities mirror the current GOP-driven legislative agenda for the special session, set to begin August 21st. While advocates for gun safety laws, among them parents of children who attend The Covenant School, have called for stricter background checks and other gun regulations, Gov. Bill Lee has set an agenda that includes unspecified recommendations for firearm staff storage.

The governor’s agenda, set forth in a proclamation also makes mention of protective orders, but other elected GOP leaders have made clear they will not consider any measures that would remove guns from any individuals.

2023 CFR Annual Report with Promulgation Statement

Tags Bill Lee, children, guns, Homicide, Memphis, Tennessee Lookout

News News Blog News Feature

Tennessee AG Asserts Right to Out-Of-State Abortion, Transgender Care Medical Records

Post author By Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout
Post date July 18, 2023

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti has joined Republican counterparts in 18 states in an effort to prevent the federal government from shielding the medical records of those who cross state lines to obtain legal abortion or gender-affirming care from investigations in their home state.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has proposed a new privacy rule for certain medical records in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s overturning of abortion rights last year.

The rule would prohibit disclosure of medical records of individuals who seek reproductive health care in a state in which the care is legal to officials or litigants in a home state in which it is not.

Under the proposed rule, the records would be shielded from law enforcement, court subpoenas and in civil lawsuits and family court proceedings.

“The proposed rule here continues the administration’s efforts to override state abortion law,” a June 16th letter from the attorneys general to HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra said.

The letter called the move to amend HIPAA — the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act — unconstitutional, a result of “political pressure from the White House” that would interfere with states’ abilities to protect the health and safety of their citizens and to pursue evidence of criminal activity.

The existence of the letter was first reported Friday by the Mississippi Free Press.

A spokesperson for Skrmetti on Monday reiterated the letter’s assertion that the federal agency was overstepping its authority in contemplating the new privacy rule.

“HHS does not have authority to change the law in contradiction of the statute passed by Congress,” Elizabeth Lane Johnson, a spokesperson for Skrmetti, said in a statement Monday.

The rule was first proposed in April after President Joe Biden issued an executive order directing HHS to “consider ways to strengthen the protection of sensitive information related to reproductive health care services and bolster patient-provider confidentiality.”

In unveiling the proposed rule — which is winding its way through the federal government’s rule-making process — HHS Office of Civil Rights Director Melanie Fontes Rainer said it came in response to the concerns of doctors and patients who feared adverse actions against those seeking care in another state that is illegal or restricted in their own.

“Today’s proposed rule is about safeguarding this trust in the patient-provider relationship, and ensuring that when you go to the doctor, your private medical records will not be disclosed and used against you for seeking lawful care,” Fontes Rainer said. “This is a real problem we are hearing and seeing, and we developed today’s proposed rule to help address this gap and provide clarity to our health care providers and patients.”

In their letter, attorneys general pushed back against the notion that they would seek to prosecute those seeking care outside their home state, calling such a claim “fear-mongering.”

Today’s proposed rule is about safeguarding this trust in the patient-provider relationship, and ensuring that when you go to the doctor, your private medical records will not be disclosed and used against you for seeking lawful care.

– Melanie Fontes Rainer, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

The letter notes that state laws criminalizing abortion consistently provide an exception for women seeking the procedure. While the HHS proposed rule does not explicitly mention transgender care, the attorneys general conclude in their letter that such care would fall under the umbrella of the plan.

Their letter outlined a hypothetical: Should officials believe an abortion provider in their home state provided an illegal abortion, falsified medical records then sent their patient for additional care out of state to cover it up, the HHS rule would bar their investigation, the letter said.

The letter also suggests the rule would bar a complete investigation into misconduct against a doctor licensed in multiple states and “could inhibit state’s investigation of child abuse and other serious crimes.”

While the letter does not specify the circumstances in which child abuse investigations would warrant out-of-state reproductive health care records, it criticizes the federal government’s “radical approach to transgender issues” and says the “administration may intend to use the proposed rule to obstruct state laws concerning experimental gender-transition procedures for minors.”

Download the letter here.

Tags abortion, Jonathan Skrmetti, Memphis, transgender