Categories
Politics Politics Feature

MAD AS HELL: Bush Quacks On As Democrats Turn Tail

George Bush is no lame duck. You aren’t lame when you’re
getting your way on everything. At a press conference this week, instead of
quacking like a duck, he was strutting like a peacock, and warning the world
of how relevant he still is. The Decider Guy is dancing with the stars. A 24%
approval rating, a (still mostly) lapdog press and Orwellian delusions
continue to assure him that he can do as he damn well pleases. In other
words, he has another18 months to take this country farther down a rat hole.
And the one thing he knows for sure is the gutless opposition has no serious
plans to stop him.

Yesterday, the president and his party succeeded in
denying millions of poor American children healthcare by vetoing a bill to
expand the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. Never mind that the
money spent on forty days in Iraq would have paid for at least ten million
poor kids to be insured for an entire year. We have the money for funding
perpetual wars, but not for our nation’s poor, sick children. This
administration, with the help of Congress, killed the bill.

Even more appalling, Bush and the Republicans fought to
get legal immunity for the telecommunications companies who helped this
government engage in spying and criminal phone tapping of innocent, private
citizens. Never mind that protecting the criminals who colluded with the
right-wingers will destroy the individual privacy and hitherto protected
freedoms of all Americans. So where did Congress line up on this despicable
piece of legislation? Right behind the Republicans, of course.

Most alarming, however, was another bizarre “Bring-It-On”
display when Bush seemed jacked up when alluding to a possible third world war
involving Iran. (Excuse me, “nukyuler armed Eye-ran.”) Jocularly chuckling at
questions regarding a potential engagement of war with another country in the
Middle East, he sounded more and more like a petulant, dangerous child.

While Bush was flipping off sick children, ripping up the
Constitution and rattling war sabers, where was the opposing party– the
majority party that was sent to Washington last year explicitly to stop Bush
from doing further damage? Pissing up the proverbial rope, as usual. Since
the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, declared impeachment of this president
to be off the table, it is the Democrats who are quickly making themselves
irrelevant. Bush and the Republicans control the agenda, determine the course
of action, and dictate the outcome. The Democrats continue to believe that
simply keeping their heads down will somehow propel them into an electoral
landslide in 2008! While Bush continues to gain relevancy by finding new and
novel ways to continue his campaign to expunge the planet of any life form
that disagrees with him, the congress merrily assumes the
earthworm-on-dry-pavement position.

In all this mess, it is the American people who seem to be
the least relevant to the politicians. Predictably, the president will continue
to carry on the Iraq war, but the one thing voters were counting on last year
when they elected a Democratic majority was having that majority use the
Constitutional powers available to them to stop the funding of the war.

And while Bush continues to destroy our Constitutional
freedoms, the Democrats astoundingly still cower in fear of being called
unpatriotic. This administration has flagrantly flouted the will of the people,
but the people figured out a long time ago not to expect anything different from
Bush. Congress, however, in its failure to confront the president, is also
ignoring the will of the people; so it is no surprise that they, not Bush, have
the lower approval rating.

-Make no mistake, Americans are sick and tired of Bush and
the Republicans, but they are more exasperated with and sickened by
Congressional Democrats who claim to be Bush’s adversaries, yet act like never
ending enablers. Like parents offering nothing more than repeated empty threats
to a destructive, out-of- control adolescent, the Democrats are the ones who are
becoming increasingly irrelevant and dare I say –lame? Perhaps they should heed
the words of the last Democratic President who said the American people would
rather support someone who is strong and wrong than someone who is right and
weak.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

MAD AS HELL: Let’s Taser Them, Bro!

In a time when
Washington is busy laying the groundwork for possible attacks on Iran, when
the nation is facing a housing market crisis with unprecedented foreclosures,
when the Senate cannot restore Habeas Corpus or give its military dwell time
to rest from war, when mercenaries hired by US private contractors are being
expelled by the Iraqi government for committing murder, and the quagmire gets
deeper by the day, the top story on all the major news networks this past week
has been the alleged botched robbery of some football memorabilia by a
washed-up ex-jock outcast.

Since this miserable
wretch didn’t even butcher anybody this time, he doesn’t deserve the favor of
our attention. But now that the news media has exhausted Britney’s custody
battle, Lindsay’s rehab, and Paris’s jail-time, they are attempting to
resurrect the Granddaddy of all media obsessions — the O. J. Simpson Trial.
CNN previewed a trial and possible conviction as “OJ –The Sequel,” while MSNBC
and other cable news channels prepared for Simpson’s arrival at his
arraignment on Wednesday by repeatedly cutting to shots of nothing but an
empty courtroom in Las Vegas. Like a rerun of a horror movie, another O. J.
circus is being conceived.

Since the last sordid
O. J. frenzy, America is worse off. The price we have paid for allowing the
so-called news industry to spend extraordinary amounts of our time on scandals
that have no impact, whatsoever, on our lives, has been the creation of a
society that is complacent, apathetic, and paranoid. Most of the problems our
country faces are not being solved because we, the people, cannot stop
distracting ourselves to death.

Wasting our lives on
nothingness has turned our nation into a collective “Chauncey Gardner” —
which was the mistaken identity conferred on one “Chance the gardener,” a
lovably befuddled TV addict who was mistaken for a seer in a memorable Peter
Sellers vehicle of the late ’70s. In a witless time, the half-wit passes for a
sage. Like Chance, we like to watch. We don’t do anything. We just watch.

Government snooping and
spying into our personal lives have become commonplace and we are now facing
an even greater danger to our personal freedoms: an enforcing of compliance.
The recent tasering of a heckler during a John Kerry appearance at The
University of Florida is a disturbing example.

Even more alarming,
however, is the symbolism of an audience that simply sat in that lecture hall
ignoring or nervously laughing while excessive police brutality was taking
place before their eyes. “Don’t taser me, bro!” the young man shrieked in
horror, as bystanders clucked, murmured, or even giggled, meanwhile remaining
motionless. They were passive voyeurs who simply watched and waited for what
was going to happen to happen.

The present
administration has enacted legislation, adopted policies, and threatened
procedures that would have been unthinkable in 1995, when the last O. J. trial
took place. On a daily basis, we are being censored, reprimanded, and
persecuted for our choice of words, our clothing, and other personal
expressions deemed unacceptable by those with power. Blind faith in bad
leadership is no longer a requirement for being considered patriotic. It is a
requirement, period. Freedom in America has been reduced to keeping our
mouths shut while looking the other way. And watching.

May we refuse to be
conned by these peddlers of folly who call themselves dispensers of “The
News!”. While they keep up with their obscene attempt to keep us deflected,
diverted, and uninformed with yet another stupid scandal, let’s taser them,
instead, bro, by getting – need I say it? – mad as hell about the things that really matter.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

MAD AS HELL: “…But to Do and Die.”

Bush has bought himself another year in Iraq. Mission
accomplished — again! Barring a miracle (doubtful) or impeachment proceedings
(inconceivable), our brave troops are guaranteed to be stuck in Iraq for the
next 16 months. Kick the can on down the road.

The buildup to this Crocker/Petraeus dog-and-pony show
has been coming for months, and arrived on the Hill like a big whoopee
cushion. General David Petraeus, Bush’s new poodle, threw out some stats,
flipped a few charts, and pointed to tables indicating the so-called surge is
working. Surge splurge. This rigged report, contradicted by a host of recent
independent reports, was total poppycock and to quote the immortal words of
Bob Dole, “You know it, I know it, and the American people know it.”

Petraeus, like the other cast members in this show, tried
to stick to script. There were a few shockers, however, when the general was
forced to extemporize.

Petraeus made the claim that the surge of 30,000
additional troops is working to improve the security of Iraq. However, he also
announced that the same number of troops will soon be leaving Iraq. If Iraq
is so safe as the result of the 30,000 troops, why would we suddenly
jeopardize the nation’s safety by pulling them out? It was a simple question
the general tap-danced around and, like the other lies Bush and his lackeys
have told, this boner brazenly defies all logic. It reminds us of their
continuing whopper that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11.

When Senator John Warner astutely asked the most
important question in the hearings, “Is the strategy this administration laid
out making us safer?”(a Howard Baker moment), Petraeus squirmed like a greased
pig until blurting out, “I don’t know.” Petraeus then volunteered stutteringly,
that in fact, he just could not say for sure if we are safer or not as a
result of being in Iraq. Imagine that! Almost a trillion dollars, over 3,500
casualties, and five years into a war – a war he is supposedly leading, this
general does not know if being there has made us any safer. Not one to suffer
fools, Warner’s insightful question led the general to admit, however
indirectly, that the entire war policy of this president has been a failure.
It was deja vu, as we suffered another “heck of a job, Brownie” moment.

The other revelation that should get everyone’s focus off
Britney Spears is the news that, as General Petraeus later strongly implied in
a news interview, it would soon be necessary to obtain authorization to take
action against Iran within its own borders, rather than just inside Iraq.
This is a confirmation of several reports made chiefly this year by the New
Yorker’s
Seymour Hirsch claiming we currently are, and have been, fighting
a proxy war with Iran within the borders of Iraq. Bush, lacking any clear
record of achievement in Iraq, is now wanting to drop bombs on Iran.

Let’s be clear about what is happening right before our
eyes: our government, of the people, by the people, and for the people is openly
stating, by way of its highest general, that it is of no consequence to this
administration whether the people of the United States or the people of Iraq
obtain their desire to stop this occupation. After years of being told that if
we fight them over there, we won’t have to fight them over here, we learn, by
the military’s reluctant admission, that we are no safer over here for having
invaded Iraq over there. Unfortunately, only a brave few in either the congress
or military have mustered the grit to call this form of governance and military
aggression by its real name—–tyranny.

General David Petraeus, ever the good soldier, has followed
the orders of his commander in chief. He seems to have adopted, literally, the
words of the poem “Charge of the Light Brigade” by Lord Tennyson:

Not tho’ the
soldier knew

Someone had
blunder’d,

Their’s not to make
reply

Their’s not to
reason why,

Their’s but to do
and die.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

MAD AS HELL: Ye Olde GOP Presidential Players

The hallmark of this president will undoubtably be the
Iraq war; however the influence of Karl Rove with his powerful Svengali job as
casting agent and director for the George W. Bush Show will loom large. Over
the last six years, America has been a willing participant in a reality show
created by Republicans called Let’s Pretend. Thematically, this is the
message: “I will pretend to tell you the truth, if you will pretend to believe
it.”

When it comes to acting, Dubya is a rookie, but you’ve
got to hand it to him —- the guy is one hell of a performer. After all, it
can’t be easy playing Goober Pyle, Howdy Doody, and Forrest Gump
simultaneously. Until now, the sunny performances by Ronald Reagan on the show
I’m Not a President but I Play One on TV
have ranked tops among
Republicans, but the acting skills of George the Forty-Third have put old
Ronnie to shame.

Cheney, Condi, and Rummy, the co-producers of this
mendacious melange, have a flair for the dramatic as well. Their formula has
been brilliant: Take Lost in Space, cross it with some Green Acres,
and lace it with just the right amounts of Combat and Rawhide
to create a new version of Groundhog Day. What a masterful stroke of genius it
was to make the media part of the cast. When it came to the thespian talents
of the working stiffs at the networks and 24 -hour cable channels, who knew?

Stage doors will soon be shutting for our Witless Wonder
but those amusement loving Republicans have nothing to fear – Fred Thompson is
waiting in the wings. Thompson, a bona fide B- lister in Hollywood rolled out
his candidacy this week by keeping all the razzle-dazzle so cherished by his
party. Not one to disappoint, Ready Freddy kicked off his campaign on The
Tonight Show
with Jay Leno.

The role of Candidate is a reprise of one of Thompson’s
earlier portrayals, but in case you missed it, this is the synopsis: Southern
Lawyer turned Washington Senator/actor/lobbyist drawls his way through America
using warmed-over Reagan anecdotes to tout Dixie-fried conservative values.
Folksy speeches that don’t really say anything but are punctuated with the
benefits of war, a devotion to God, and the love of freedom stir the crowds of
the saved and self-righteous. Winking and smiling, Thompson is assuring
nervous neo-cons that he’s their man and will continue on with the Bush
charade of pretending to tell us the truth, so we can continue to pretend to
believe it.

With rank hypocrisy, Republicans love to condemn the
mythical Hollywood life style and claim it to be the epitome of hedonism
represented only by Democrats. Yet Republicans are the ones with a penchant
for electing real actors — candidates whose multiple marriages, secret
lovers, and closeted sexcapades more accurately reflect Hollywood values. In
the days ahead, it will be interesting to see if Mr. Law-‘n-Order can cast his
actor’s spell over Republican voters.

On the other hand: Surely, the time has come for people
to consider electing a President who is genuinely more interested in winning
the Nobel Prize for Peace than the Academy Award for Acting.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

MAD AS HELL: I’m Back!

About a year ago, I decided it was time to chill. Time to
take a change. When it came to discussing or writing things political, it was
time to simply throw in the proverbial towel, and stop being mad as hell.

With all of the amusements and distractions on
television, not to mention the ever inept MSM (mainstream media), it would be
easy to tune out. With places to travel, plans to make, and life to live,
doing all of that in a constant state of pissiness was becoming a drag. From
now on, I told myself, when the subject of politics, the war, and Dubya came
up, I would declare myself to be SO over it. My garage door was officially
down. I would now simply be Resigned As Hell.

Last week, as I faithfully read the latest copy of The
Flyer,
I scanned Chris Herrington’s review of the movie No End
in Sight.
The movie, a documentary on the invasion and occupation of Iraq,
sounded interesting, but like something that would appeal to those who are
still venting and irked about the state of affairs. Superbad or The
Simpson’s Movie
would be a better choice for someone who is calm, cool,
and over with politics. After all, when you are Resigned As Hell, the last
thing you want to do is to get all hot and bothered about Bush, the war, etc.,
etc.

Labor Day, fall’s official entry, is marked by Americans
with a last swim, some school shopping, and a chance to see that blockbuster
you’ve missed all summer. Like many, I decided it was time to catch a flick.
Call it a change of season, or something in the air, but when I got to the
cinema, for some reason, my resignation started to crumble. I bought a ticket
to No End in Sight.

One critic of the movie said, “Even well-informed
audiences will find their jaws dropping.”

He was right. Comments made by former Bush political
advisors, strategists, and planners were so alarming, my jaws were dropping.
The many remarks made by the U.S. soldiers made my head jangle.

Hearing former Army Major General Paul Eaton, responsible
for training the New Iraqi Army, recount that George W. Bush, Commander in
Chief, had been, after the invasion of Baghdad, totally unaware that his
hand-picked official, L. Paul “Jerry” Bremer, was disbanding the Iraqi Army,
was infuriating.

Listening to the former official in charge of the
Baghdad occupation, Barbara Bodine, describe the office she was given at the
Pentagon and its lack of a computer, or even a telephone, brought back
memories of the unbelievable incompetence demonstrated by this administration
after Hurricane Katrina.

The comments regarding the inability of our officials to
communicate with the Iraqis because no one spoke Arabic was outrageous.
Finally, when discussing the occupation and the ensuing chaos that took place,
former Marine Lieutenant Seth Moulton, a Harvard graduate who led his infantry
platoon during a 2004 deadly attack by militias in Najaf, asks, “Are you
telling me that’s the best America can do? Don’t tell me that. That makes me
angry.”

Well, Seth, I’m feelin’ ya. I’m incensed! I’m livid!
I’m MAD AS HELL!!! And for the next 505 days, there’s no end in sight! Watch
this space!

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

MAD AS HELL: Chipping Away at Our Freedom

For all the FOX News-loving Freedom Fighters who continue
to bang their war drums insisting that Iraq was invaded to spread freedom
while defending the Bush regime’s calls for Americans to be wiretapped,
thumb-printed, filmed, wanded, searched, carded, frisked, and scanned  in the
name of “security” – how about this? Are you ready to be “chipped”? No, we’re
not talking computers, fingernails, or china.  “Tagged” – it’s not just for
Spot and Fluff anymore. And it may be coming to a workplace near you.

A company in Ohio recently embedded silicon-tracking
chips into a couple of its employees. The two workers complied with a request
to have their right arms implanted with a glass-encased radio transmitter that
can be read by a special monitor that tracks their every move at work. It’s a
human OnStar for employers. The private video surveillance company who was
hired to test the technology claims the devices are necessary for controlling
access to company security rooms.  The employer defends it by saying it is not
compulsory. Not yet, anyway. Of course, the device can also be used to track
the “wearer” any time of day and night without their knowledge.

In the name of protection and security, just how much
privacy can Americans be expected to surrender?  How many more freedoms are we
willing to give up? We should not forget the words to the old Janis Joplin
song, “Me and Bobby McGee”.  Freedom is just another word for nothing left to
lose.

Last week, I got a cold and needed to purchase some
over-the-counter decongestant. When I got to the colds-and-flu section of my
neighborhood drugstore, the shelves were bare. After I told a pharmacist on
duty what I was looking for, she brought the contraband to the pharmacy
window. Then things got crazy.  I was told that in order to make my purchase,
a government-issued ID would have to be produced as well as the disclosure of
my full name, home address and signature in a company record book. The
purchase could not exceed three boxes for the month. After hearing my rather
acerbic remarks of protest, the pharmacist dismissively replied, “This is for
your protection.” Treating a stuffy nose will now cost us dearly.

Like most, I am well aware of the tremendous problem the
country faces regarding the use and manufacture of methamphetamines. Tennessee
has one of the most difficult situations of any state. But requiring
pharmacists and other employees to become veritable police by tracking
purchases and recording personal data of the law abiding will not stop the
meth manufacturers from getting the stuff they need.  Ultimately, this sort of
violation of my privacy will only succeed in stripping each of us of our
remaining precious freedoms. Shockingly there are hundreds of millions of
“sheeple” who have either resigned themselves to these indignities or have
been deluded into thinking we are somehow safer and more protected by giving
up our personal and civil freedoms.

If the right to own and purchase a gun, which seems to be
the only freedom of concern these days, is our single remaining freedom, we
are not free. Embedded electronic tracking and monitored store purchases are
just more examples of the extreme policing that is being done under the guise
of,  and in the name of,  security and protection. So when right-wing idiots
start  their cacophony of twaddle about spreading our freedoms in Iraq, ask
them, in your best Janis Joplin voice, just where they would like their chip
planted.

Want
to respond? Send us an email here.

 

 

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

MAD AS HELL: Fabricators? Fabricators?!!





New Page 1

The two Americas of these Disunited States crashed in a
historical encounter this week at the funeral of Coretta Scott King. When the
two worlds collided, it was quite a spectacle. And the fact that it happened
at all will be the most momentous and lasting tribute to the first lady of the
Civil Rights Movement.

 

After her husband’s death, Mrs. King proved to the world
that she could move mountains of hatred with her rare combination of strength,
poise, beauty, and dignity. At her funeral, it was fitting to see the
mountains of fraud and lies of this administration moved for a brief moment so
that her memory could be celebrated with the same truth and righteousness that
she gave to all.

 

By attending this most public of events, George W. Bush
found himself right smack in the middle of the Other America – the one that
wasn’t pre-screened, monitored, and picked by his handlers. He became the
veritable Emperor sitting in a sanctuary of ten thousand people who refused to
reinforce neither his deluded version of reality nor his party’s revised
version of history.

 

Reverend Joseph Lowery’s reminding that there were no
weapons of mass destruction was the first salvo of truth that stripped the
Emperor, rendering him buck naked. When Senator Kennedy recalled that the
beatitudes of Jesus instructed us to be peacemakers, all of Bush’s religious
hypocrisy was laid bare. Jimmy Carter’s remembrance of the wiretapping of
Martin Luther King and his family by the government seemed to be a sword of
truth that was particularly sharp and difficult to take. 

 

As expected, the funeral had barely ended when the right
wing went into hyper mode replete with feigned outrage of the
inappropriateness of it all.  Listening to Kate O’Beirne of CNN calling Jimmy
Carter, “Our most graciousless ex-president” was both laughable and pathetic. 
The folks at FOX News were seething apoplectics.  That America had heard
the
truth, not just their truth really had their bowels in an
uproar.

 

Our ever amusing and always undecipherable Congressman
Harold Ford, Jr., a Democratic contender for the U. S. Senate, contributed
this remark about the funeral to the progressive blog,
thehuffingtonpost.com
: “Funerals should not be ceremonies to fabricate a
life’s works.” The resulting comments posted mostly by Democrats indicate the
congressman might be trying to explain his way out of this one for a while. At
the least, his choice of words was unfortunate, as the implication seems to be
that Mrs. King’s funeral was a contrivance used as a build up to commemorate
someone not truly deserving of the tributes.

 

However, his use of the word ‘fabrication’ is rather
interesting, as the real fabrication lies in the pretense of a candidate who,
while running as a Democrat, never misses an opportunity to suck up to and
weasel down for Republicans.  It is too bad for Tennessee and too bad for the
Other America that the congressman can only muster enough courage to criticize
those who had enough conviction to tell the truth.  Instead of fighting those
who personify everything Coretta Scott King stood against all her life, he
apparently wants to join them.

 

 




 

Want
to respond? Send us an email here.

 

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

MAD AS HELL: The New Look of “Freedom”






New Page 1

“I will never relent in defending America, whatever it
takes.”
  – George Bush

“Whatever It Takes”is the new Bush rule of law. Get used to
it.  It’s the only law in our Brave New World. No other laws are necessary. 
It’s short and simple:  I will do whatever I damn well please, and you damn well
better like it.  If you don’t, you are an unpatriotic obstructionist who is an
enemy of America and of course, an enemy of God.

Tuesday night, we watched the law get put into action.
Cindy Sheehan was invited to listen to the State of the Union address by a
member of Congress from her home state of California. She accepted the
invitation, showed her required ticket, and was escorted to her seat.  In the
Brave New World, getting familiar with the new law is sometimes confusing. When
it comes to attire, one must choose carefully and wisely.  Cindy had chosen
poorly. She was wearing a black T-shirt with the big white numbers, 2,242 that
reflected the number of the dead soldiers in Iraq on it. At that moment, our
country was so threatened and so under attack it had to be defended! So Cindy
got Whatever It Takes. She was removed by force, handcuffed, booked, and put in
jail.  If only someone had told her freedom is on the march.

In our Brave New World, we’re not scared, because we’re
free.

We’re free to have our phone conversations wiretapped.

We’re free to have our e-mails read and examined.

We’re free to have our library and book purchasing records
tracked.

We’re free to have our bodies searched any time, any place,
for any reason.                    

We’re free to have our religious services monitored.

We’re free to be put in a cage indefinitely without a
trial.

We’re free to be locked up without being charged or being
able to confront witnesses against us.

We’re free to be tortured.

We’re free to have our homes searched and possessions
seized without probable cause.

We’re free to be watched and recorded by public
surveillance cameras  every second of every day.

And the
freedoms just keep on coming.  But in the Brave New World, with its singular
rule of law, unless  federal Storm Troopers knock down the doors of your home
and drag you off to the gulags, hell –  you’re free!  With liberty and justice
for all, George W. Bush and a Republican-controlled government will make sure
every  American will eventually get Whatever It Takes.

Categories
News News Feature

MAD AS HELL

‘W’ IS FOR ‘WHY’

It took 120 hours after the country’s most devastating natural disaster for the administration to finally get their spin in order. Back from her shoe-shopping spree came Condi ”Lyin’” Rice. Fresh from his “Who Knew?” tour, Donald Rumsfeld surfaced. We have yet to see Vice President Dick “Bunker” Cheney. However, Cheney’s Halliburton pals have already acquired the levee-repair contracts in New Orleans.

As the Gulf Coast became a hell on earth and thousands stood waist deep in fetid water watching their babies starve and their grandmothers drown, this “culture-of-life” president finally ended his five-week vacation only to prime his spin-machine pump before sending in the military, FEMA, and Homeland “security”.

The administration’s defenders, apologists, and surrogates were cued and ready to blame the Mayor of New Orleans, the governor of Louisiana, and the victims themselves.

Driving down Poplar Avenue here in Memphis, I noticed dozens of those black decals on cars with the initial “W” when it finally struck me — ‘W’ stands for ‘Why?’

Why do we tolerate a President who prizes thousands of days of vacation over solving the dire and urgent challenges facing the nation? Why do we demand so little of and willingly accept a leader who has an aversion to intellectual curiosity? Why have we ignored a Congress who values tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations over fiscal responsibility? Why have we supported a phony war in Iraq costing billions daily that more rightly should be used for our aging, crumbling infrastructure? Why have we cheered on anti-government politicians like Governor Haley Barbour who is dedicated to dismantling and defunding federal and state programs critical to the welfare of its citizens?

Why are we still listening to insensitive dimwits like Speaker Dennis Hastert who questioned rebuilding “because it makes no sense to me”? Why haven’t Republicans confronted the duplicity of George W. Bush, whose boners include the likes of “No one anticipated a breach of the levee system” along with “No one anticipated a hijacker using an airplane as a weapon” and “Iraq is 45 minutes away from firing nuclear weapons on America”? Why do we pump gas at almost $4 a gallon while Iraqis pay only 5 cents?

Our nation needlessly lost a treasure this week. New Orleans was a unique gumbo of race, music, commerce, and food . But for now the Sugar Bowl on New Year’s, Mardi Gras on Fat Tuesday , the jazz of Preservation Hall, the coffee and beignets at Jackson Square, even the hapless Saints are only magical memories to us all.

Those who continue to defend this President and his administration by trying to spin away such an immense, callous failure should continue to pridefully display their ‘W’ stickers like bogus badges of honor. For the rest of us, they will hauntingly prompt the question…. WHY?

Want to respond? Send us an email here.

Categories
Cover Feature News

A Crawford Diary:

Editor’s Note: Memphian Cheri DelBrocco, who writes the “Mad as Hell” column for the Flyer‘s Web site, spent several days last week at Camp Casey, the site adjoining President Bush’s Crawford, Texas, ranch, where a vigil is being kept by Cindy Sheehan, mother of one of the almost 2,000 Americans killed so far in Iraq. Joined by increasing numbers of sympathizers and members of the media, Sheehan continues her quest for a conversation with the president and for an answer to a question which reduces to a simple premise: Why are we in Iraq?

What follows is a distillation of DelBrocco’s notes on her journey, a somewhat different, raw version of which can be found elsewhere on the Flyer Web site, at Mad as Hell Blog.

Day One:

August 16th – As my friend and sidekick Deborah Brackstone and I roll down I-35 into Waco, Texas, in our rented Chevy Malibu, we pass the Texas Chainsaw Massacre Museum and wonder about the Texas sense of humor. A huge purple skull holding a sickle sticks out of a double-wide trailer. Deborah, who’s from Cordova, is coming to Crawford, Texas, seeking the truth about the war in Iraq, this administration, and Cindy Sheehan, the grieving mother of a dead soldier, who wants to meet with President Bush. And so am I.

Crawford is approximately 18 miles west of Waco. We remind ourselves to look for the David Koresh compound in Waco on our return from Crawford. There’s not much in Crawford except a couple of home-cooking restaurants, a few dozen homes with “I support the President” signs and banners in the yard, three or four churches, and, at the railroad tracks, a corner grocery. In front of the store is a flatbed truck loaded with a huge reproduction of the Liberty Bell flanked by concrete replicas of the Ten Commandments.

The nine-mile stretch to the Bush compound reminds us of rural Fayette County, only with cactus and wild sunflowers growing along the roadside. Goat farms and cattle ranches come one after another. We’re in the boonies. Only a few SUVs pass, going the other way. Suddenly, we see it: Camp Casey – named for Pvt. Casey Sheehan, 24, of California, who died in Iraq on April 4, 2004.

Before we approach the camp itself, which is literally in a ditch off the road, we spot the Crawford Peace House. It looks like a scene right out of a folk-art painting, complete with peace T-shirts and other paraphernalia.

Smiling volunteers are minding the store, so to speak, giving directions and offering food, water, and other basic amenities. Most are middle-aged; some appear to be throwbacks to the ’60s war-protest days with their gray braids, peasant skirts, and sandals. They ask where we are from and offer us a ride on the “Cindy Shuttle” for the short drive to the campsite.

As we near the campsite, a startling scene emerges. Small white crosses, each with a name of one of the approximately 1,900 soldiers who have died in Iraq, line the road. Someone has placed a fresh, red rosebud on each. Some have photos, teddy bears, or mementos propped up against them. A sense of sadness pervades.

The moment we enter, we spot Cindy. She is waiting serenely for the mics to be set up by a milling group of media types. Cindy is tall and tan with short, sun-streaked hair. She’s wearing khaki capris and a brown T-shirt with crosses, medallions, and beads hung around her neck. Her son’s name is tattooed on her left ankle.

To the crowd of 100 or more people gathered about her, she announces that some neighbors closer to the Bush ranch have just offered their property for her use and that the entire camp will be moving there over the next few days – down the road, closer to where she hopes she might finally get a visit or invitation from George and Laura Bush. One drawback to the new location, she advises: fewer trees to shade people from the brutal Texas sun.

Many people in today’s crowd are holding crosses, and there is talk of prayer and scripture. This is a middle-aged crowd, almost exclusively white. Some have names like “Joyous Rainbow.” Others look like soccer moms. There are military families who have lost members in Iraq. They treat Cindy like some sort of sage, a spiritual being like the Dalai Lama. Total strangers approach and touch her, hug her, give her flowers. Some break down emotionally.

As she sits in a lawn chair, with her sister at her side, I walk up and introduce myself. Cindy comments about how nice everyone around here has been so far, except for the neighbor who shot in the air. This, I learn, is one Larry Mattlage, a Crawford rancher whose land is across the road from the campsite. On the previous Sunday, he had come out of his house and fired a shotgun into the air while the campers were conducting a prayer service. He also put up a “No Parking” sign on his property. The local sheriff deputies and the Secret Service paid a visit to Mattlage but later acknowledged his actions were within the law in Texas.

Cindy tells me about Bush’s flippant attitude during their brief meeting in June 2004, a 10-minute affair when she and other members of her newly bereaved family had met the president in Tacoma, Washington. It was as if he didn’t care to know anything about her, she says.

I ask her about her religious faith. Cindy says that she has not attended mass for some time and that none of the fellow parish members or the priest at the church she has attended have contacted her. She has been conducting an interfaith prayer service every day at the camp, however. She tells me that no congressional Democrats who voted for the war have contacted her but that several who did not vote for it had called to offer sympathy. Congressman Walter Jones of North Carolina, she says, is the only Republican who has met with her to offer an apology for his vote in favor of the war.

I decide that I have asked enough questions of Cindy and get ready to leave. She asks me if she can have a hug. It is an emotionally overwhelming moment as I palpably get a tremendous sense of this mother’s grief. She tells Deborah and me that more than 1,000 candlelight vigils will be held across the U.S. the next day in support of the efforts at Camp Casey and as demonstrations of Americans’ desire for the troops to come home. Deborah and I plan to attend the vigil here tomorrow.

Day Two:

August 17 – Heading out Highway 185 to Crawford, we are reminded again of Tennessee. The flat land, greener than we had imagined, with winding country roads and barbed-wire fences running for miles, could be in any rural West Tennessee county. The searing morning sun also feels familiar. Stopping for film at a souvenir shop in Crawford, we see jars of pecans in heavy syrup and bottles of barbecue sauce.

At the Crawford Peace House, waiting for the shuttle to the camp site, I meet Diane Wagener, a 50-something homemaker married to a retired Army reservist and West Point graduate. They are native Texans who now make their home in Denton. Diane and a group of other women from military families have driven to Crawford to show solidarity with Cindy but also to talk about their activism regarding retired military personnel.

“Reservists are having to lobby to keep their benefits,” she says. Wryly, she tells me that among military families in Texas, President Bush and Vice President Cheney are known as “two good ole boys from the oil patch.”

On the road to the camp, we note again the little white crosses, with a Star of David or Islamic crescent here and there among them, symbols of the war dead. A day before, a Waco resident named Larry Northern had run over the crosses with his pickup truck. He was later arrested and charged with criminal mischief. A tremendous number of the names on the now restored crosses are Hispanic. Some journalists who are with us explain that many of the soldiers who died were illegal immigrants who volunteered in order to gain citizenship.

At the camp, Cindy is sitting in a lawn chair under an umbrella, sorting through her mail – hundreds of envelopes, it appears. Soon the media approach her and an impromptu press conference ensues:

Q: “What will you do when this is over?”

A: I will continue to fight so that not one other young person has to ever die again in an unjust war such as this one.

I plan to go to Italy next month to the U.N. delegation conference for youth. I have three other children and I will go on with my life, but we are all so aware of Casey’s loss and the lack of his presence when we are together. “How do you feel about the fact that your husband is divorcing you?”

I think it is awful the way some in the press such as Drudge, Bill O’Reilly, and Sean Hannity are depicting me and being so mean with such negativity, but I am willing to be the sacrificial lamb if that is what it takes to stop this war.

Around noon, we spot Anderson Cooper of CNN. A retired elementary school teacher from San Antonio is telling him that when she saw the reports about the crosses being run over, she realized that she had to make her way to Crawford to meet Cindy. “I was pissed off,” she says. “Actually, I’ve been pissed off about this war from the very beginning.”

Soon, Cooper turns to talk to a group of us standing by. Someone complains to him that the media badgered Clinton about his sex life but has been relatively soft in reporting Bush’s derelictions. I join in: “Mr. Cooper, you know the media has never asked tough questions of the Bush administration,” I say. “Why don’t you ask them why the story line for why we invaded Iraq has changed so many times?”

The cotton-haired media star defends his objectivity but grows defensive. “Do you want objective reporting or biased reporting from the left?” he asks. I tell him all we want is truly fair reporting and challenge him to tell me one example of a TV network whose “left-wing bias” might match the notorious right-wing slant of Fox News.

He chuckles. “I don’t know. All I can tell you is what I do at CNN and that I try to do the best and fairest job I can do.”

As we get ready to leave, a member of the group tells Cooper that the movement supporting Cindy Sheehan could be called “the revenge of the 50-year-old middle-class woman.” He smiles politely.

Day Three:

August 18th – The Texas sun is unrelenting. It is over 85 degrees at 9 a.m. We stop again at the souvenir shop in Crawford. The owner, behind the counter, recognizes us and is cordial. He tells us the land for the Bush ranch, with more than 1,600 acres and a 16-acre lake, was purchased in 1999 for $2.9 million. The locals call it the “Western White House.” He adds that the media is not allowed on the ranch and that George and Laura Bush are said to be getting ready to add an addition to the property, a $1 million guest home for their daughters.

At the campsite there is a larger media presence than the day before. I meet an ecologist, Glen Barry, from Green Bay, Wisconsin, who heads up a group called Greens Against the War. “This war is devastating our earth,” he says. I talk to several other newcomers: John Graborn, of Philadelphia, is representing Veterans for Peace. I discuss with him and others a new letter-writing campaign to Laura Bush to persuade her to visit the campsite. The consensus of those I talk to is that Laura Bush didn’t make this war and that for President Bush to try to “make nice” by using his wife to reach out to Cindy would be an insult to the cause, though several think it might be helpful for Laura Bush to embrace Cindy Sheehan as one mother to another.

We go back to the row of crosses and notice again the preponderance of Hispanic names. Our hearts grow heavy as we read “Jesus Angel Gonzalez,” “Genaro Acusta,” and “Rablito Pena Briones, Jr.” on the pieces of paper attached with rubber bands to the crosses. A Hispanic group, who identify themselves as members of the Flores family, arrives to place their own cross among the others. Their fallen Marine is Lance Corporal Jonathan R. Flores, who died in Ramadi, Iraq, on June 15th.

Rubin Flores, 43, had traveled from San Antonio with his niece, Ebony Castro, 15, nephew Aaron Ramos, 12, son Jason Flores, 15, and the late Marine’s fiancée, Alexandra Aragon, 18. Jason’s twin brother could not make the four-hour drive. Family members, having seen Cindy Sheehan on the news, say they felt compelled to come and meet her so they could be with someone who could understand their pain. As we talk, there is a good deal of crying and hugging all around. Alexandra looks young. Her black hair is highlighted with magenta streaks. She is still wearing her fiancé’s Marine Corps insignia ring. She turned 18 last year, she says, and cast her first presidential vote for John Kerry because she did not agree with the war in Iraq. Still, she had supported Jonathan in his military mission because she loved him and knew how deeply he had wanted to be a Marine.

Through tears, Jason tells me how proud he was of his brother and how they had corresponded every four days or so. In his letters, Corporal Flores had confided how “horrible” the war was but related how pleased he was to be teaching the Iraqi kids to play American sports. Maybe we should stay in Iraq until we are “finished,” the family members agree. When will that be? I ask. When we have built back the country that we have torn apart, they say.

Rubin Flores is, like the others, wearing a T-shirt with a photo of Jonathan on the front. He looks tired and slightly dazed. He tells us he feels like a “lost” man and says, “What they are doing is a suicide mission.” After a long, emotional silence, he continues: “I just wish Bush had a plan.”

At that moment, Cindy approaches the Flores family. As they embrace, everyone weeps and huddles together. It was the most powerful moment of my time in Crawford.

The 200 or so supporters of Cindy are getting prepared to move to the new site, closer to the Bush residence. At some point, a counter-protester shows up. Gary Arnett, who says he is from Pottsboro, Texas, has brought his toddler daughter with him. He walks around complaining about Cindy Sheehan. “I have been a Texan since 1839,” Arnett says, “and as a seventh-generation Texan, I believe this is exploitation.” He adds that the people who have come from California, New York, Massachusetts, and indeed all over are unwanted. As he talks, his daughter swelters, unprotected from the sun. Someone in the group of Sheehan supporters asks if a hat or other covering can be found for the child. Eventually, one of the protesters takes her up gently and puts her into her father’s arms, just as he is about to yell that Camp Casey is an exploitation of Texas that will do nothing to end the war in Iraq. He concludes his harangue, child tucked in his arms, by telling Cindy to leave Texas.

He gets his wish – temporarily, at least. By the end of the day, news comes that Cindy’s mother has suffered a stroke, and she is on her way to California to see her. She will, however, return, or so she vows.

Epilogue:

Deborah and I went to Crawford to confirm our gut suspicions about Cindy Sheehan, President Bush, this war, and the growing unrest of the American people. As usual, gut feelings don’t lie. Cindy’s description of her encounter with Bush in Tacoma in 2004, the one that prompted her ultimately to begin her vigil, was unsettling. As she told about that meeting, it was easy to envision the Bush strut she described – entering the room as though he were entering a party.

Cindy’s description of her meeting with Bush reminded me of the stage-managed “Mission Accomplished” performance on an aircraft carrier on May 29, 2003. Even the Bush ranch struck me as a contrivance that perpetuates the sham. The then Texas governor had purchased the property only a few months before his election to the presidency, and it comes off as a gigantic movie prop. What you see on television is a stage set of old barns, equipment, and fencing nearly 10 miles away from the actual ranch.

The idea that everyone who lives in Texas loves and supports ol’ Dubya may also be a sham – or at least an overstatement. We met many Texans who see the president as an arrogant son who used his daddy’s name and connections to get ahead.

It seems to me that what Cindy Sheehan and the others mourning their war dead at Camp Casey are doing is bringing a visible accountability to bear on this administration’s policies in Iraq. Their testimony is clear: America has gained nothing of value and lost much from this war. We have gained no security, no freedom, no fortune, no land, and no allies. Instead, we’ve gained death, dismemberment, increased national debt, more enemies, and more restrictions on our freedoms.

President Bush could have defused this story on the first day Cindy arrived in Crawford. He could have embraced her, looked her in the eye, and honestly answered her question: “What was the noble cause you keep claiming my son died for?”

But perhaps he didn’t because he didn’t know himself.