Categories
Art Exhibit M

Become a Design Genius at the Memphis Public Library for Free

When I was fresh out of college and in search of gainful employment, I applied to a bunch of jobs that required me to know Adobe Photoshop without my actually having any idea how to use Photoshop. I figured that it couldn’t really be that hard, since various tween-age members of my family seemed adept at it. I figured I’d fake it until I made it. 

But when I got my first assignment that required me to know how to lasso pixels (what is this, really?) I panicked. I had about 24 hours to figure out what I was doing or else look dumb. So I got a subscription to Lynda, a website that has tons of very useful tutorials that teach you how to use everything from architectural design software to Adobe products. It is an extremely useful tool for both beginning and veteran designers who want to keep up with fast-changing software (note: this is not being paid for by Lynda. It is a great website.) It isn’t design focused, either; there are tutorials on business and coding as well. The downside is that at $25 per month, the site is relatively expensive for people on a limited budget. 

Which is why it rules that the Memphis Public Library announced recently that it will provide Lynda to library cardholders for free, thanks to support from the Memphis Library Foundation. 

From the Library’s blog post about the new development: 

“Customers can customize their own curricula with more than 122,000 individual tutorial videos, covering a range of topics from desktop and office software to photography, web development, graphic arts, recording and audio engineering, marketing, technical skills, business strategies, creative techniques, career development and more. Customers interested in computer programming, coding, computer-aided drafting, IT management, web design, music, 3-D animation, and other related areas of study will find courses to match their interests as well. Certificates of completion are available for customers who want to measure progress or build their resumes.

… ‘The Library’s mission has always been about providing customers access to the information they need and want, in whatever format works best – books, audio, video, or online,’ noted Collection Development Manager Alan Stewart. ‘We’re delighted to be able to extend and enhance our mission by offering these high-quality e-learning resources from Lynda.com.'” 

Time to learn all the Adobe products on the cheap. Thanks, MPL! 

Categories
News The Fly-By

How Prisoner Release Impacts Tennessee

In the first week of November, Tennessee saw the return of 150 federal drug offenders who were released from prison with shortened sentences, following action by the U.S. Sentencing Commission to reduce penalties for nonviolent drug offenders.

The former inmates, who are among 6,112 released nationally at the beginning of the month, are now on supervised release and will begin the often rocky search for jobs, housing, and stability.

“The majority of this particular population that is coming out of prison, they are going to lack a high school education,” said Donnie Couch, the CEO of D.C. Counseling and Consulting, a Hickory Hill-based drug and alcohol treatment center that works with the criminal justice population. Couch works with men and women on referrals from state and federal prisons, attorneys, and word-of-mouth.

“These people are going to lack marketable job skills and parenting skills,” Couch said. “They are going to be unemployed. They are going to have substance abuse issues as well as mental health issues, and the majority of them are going to be homeless.”

The release of these prisoners, a fraction of the 46,000 eligible for resentencing, follows a period of increased national scrutiny of the “mandatory minimum” penalties implemented during the war on drugs, policies that have come under criticism for unfairly targeting minorities.

Though Couch, who has worked with former state and federal inmates for 34 years, is supportive of the adjustment of federal drug penalties (“I think that there has been a disparity [in sentencing] all along, especially when it comes to powder and crack cocaine,” Couch said), he notes that the release of an increased number of offenders may strain Shelby County’s network of reentry and treatment programs.

These programs are funded by state and federal grants, such as the $61 million allocated to Tennessee in 2015 by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

“There is a rising need for resources,” Couch said. “I haven’t seen the trickle-down of federal dollars to the community-based organizations for the resources that are required to address the needs of this population.”

For felons, the margin of error while on supervised release is very small. Reentry programs include support for job training, temporary housing, and mental health treatment services. These programs are often invaluable in helping felons avoid homelessness, medical emergencies, or reoffending — conditions which can prove dire for felons and expensive for taxpayers.

Couch’s program, and others like it, use skill-based assessments to help offenders, who may have difficulty finding regular employment due to their status as felons, become entrepreneurs. Former inmates are encouraged, according to Couch, to gain a marketable job skill, get six months’ experience in that job skill, and turn that job skill into a small business.

Success stories do happen: Couch recently heard from a former client who has founded a successful small business selling hair-extensions. “If you were a drug dealer, you understand supply and demand,” Couch said.

“Just housing someone, just providing a roof, doesn’t mean anything,” Couch said. “We need programs that understand what drives behaviors and belief systems. The goal is to keep people from returning to the prison system or showing up in emergency rooms.”

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Indie Memphis 2015

One of the best things about Indie Memphis is the festival’s schedule of shorts from local, national, and international filmmakers. This year, the entries range from documentary shorts about young dancers in Memphis (Suzannah Herbert’s “What’s Inside the Cage”) to narrative works about living with an autoimmune disorder (Stacey Ashworth’s “No Breath Play”). Over 70 submissions, all under 25 minutes, will play throughout the week. We picked out a few of our favorites.

“The Department of Signs and Magical Intervention”

“The Department of Signs and Magical Intervention” – Melissa Anderson Sweazy

When Aidan (Sean McBride) gets hit by a fast-moving bus while skateboarding, he finds himself in the afterlife, a realm that — according to Memphis filmmaker Melissa Anderson Sweazy — looks a whole lot like the most boring parts of corporeal existence. Specifically, it looks like a bank. Except instead of dealing in dollars, this ethereal vault and its matter-of-fact employees dole out “signs and magical intervention” to unsuspecting humans.

“The Department of Signs and Magical Intervention,” shot in Downtown Memphis with a cast of familiar local faces, is perhaps this year’s most charming contender: lighthearted, very funny, and smartly framed by Sweazy. The lesson, as Aidan navigates an undead bureaucracy, is that magic, and second chances, just might exist.

“Alphabet” – Ben Siler

“Alphabet,” the latest from Memphis underground filmmaker Ben Siler, opens with a blonde woman wielding an axe in a suburban kitchen. Blood spatters on her shirt as she hacks at someone out-of-frame. You see her digging a hole in her garden and then shoving potato chips into her mouth and examining her nails. Later, she cries to a neighbor, who comforts her unsentimentally.

In two minutes and 37 seconds, we see two murders, an affair, and the long legacy of a secret. It’s funny and brilliant in Siler’s usual muted, dark way. Siler’s dialogue-less, low-definition shorts are as sharply edited as they are pointedly mundane. Despite frequently macabre and over-the-top plots, the filmmaker’s lens is always focused on unremarkable details, such as the glass of seltzer water on the table, or an unplugged power strip in the corner.

“To Cross”

“To Cross” – Suzannah Herbert

This documentary short from the Brooklyn-based and Memphis-born filmmaker Suzannah Herbert follows a high school student named Jared on his daily commute. At 3:30 a.m., Jared wakes up on the Mexican side of Tijuana, early enough that he is able to cross the border and attend high school in America. Twelve arduous hours later, he returns home to Mexico. “At the end of the day, we are really tired,” says Jared, who, we learn, is the only member of his family able to attend school in the U.S. After graduation, he hopes to be able to support his siblings by finding work in the States.

Herbert’s short shines light on the lengths Jared and his peers go to in order to obtain an education, despite the fact that their schooling is considered illegal since the students are not United States residents. “To Cross” gives viewers a sense of its subjects not only as young people, tasked with the care of their families, but as regular high school students. Herbert, who has worked for Martin Scorsese and Michael Moore in addition to making her own films, tells Jared’s story with a light touch and characteristic skill.

“One Hitta Quitta”

“One Hitta Quitta” – Ya’Ke Smith

“One Hitta Quitta” is a genre-bending narrative entry from newcomer Ya’Ke Smith, a Texas-based filmmaker. The film melds real footage of fights, shot on phones and posted online, with the story of a young man whose obsession with watching violent footage leads him to act out. We see Jason (Dariel Embry) challenge his algebra teacher, Mr. Kelly (Shelton Jolivette), while other students in the class surround with phones primed.

Smith shot entirely on mobile devices, which contributes to the film’s fast pace and realistic feel. In the height of the short’s drama, when Mr. Kelly returns Jason’s punch, the frame shifts from horizontal to vertical to horizontal again, referencing the crowd-sourced depictions of similar real events. Smith’s handling is seamless, and makes what might otherwise be a run-of-the-mill story into something new and on point.

Categories
Film/TV Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Horrortober: Silence Of The Lambs (1991)

Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter in Silence Of The Lambs

FILM TITLE: Silence of the Lambs (1991)

ELAPSED TIME: 100%

WHY DID I STOP WATCHING? Hannibal has an old friend for dinner.

I usually make a policy of not reading reviews of movies before I write my own, but after finishing (that’s right — I finished it. All of it.) Silence of the Lambs last night, I went on a minor googling tear about the movie’s creation and initial reception. Because as soon as you see a movie as good as Silence of the Lambs, the next thought is necessarily, “How the fuck did they do that?”

I found a Roger Ebert review, penned in 2001 following the release of Silence of the Lambs’ underwhelming follow-up, Hannibal. Ebert writes that though Silence of the Lambs is not slasher-film disturbing, it has several genuinely frightening moments: Clarice’s first meeting with the eerily still Hannibal, the Kafka-esque removal of the moth from a victim’s throat, the elevator scene after Hannibal escapes, the back-and-forth cuts between Buffalo Bill’s real house and the false one, and the extended sequence in Bill’s basement at the end. Ebert’s point is that these moments aren’t just gross or suspenseful, but psychologically unsettling in a way that makes them timeless. Because they take place within an airtight character drama, they feel necessary, rather than excessive.

Silence Of The Lambs would be a character drama, except this happens.

As a first-time viewer and someone with little-to-no horror watching experience, I have to say that Silence of the Lambs was revelatory for me. Imagine if you thought you hated comedy but the only comedy you’d ever seen was Joe Dirt 2: Beautiful Loser. You’d probably think comedy sucked, right? But then someone showed you Airplane! You’d realize you were wrong. I thought horror sucked because I’d never actually seen a horror movie before Horrortober, and of the handful of very good movies I’ve watched, Silence of the Lambs is the one that has felt the most worth it. The element of fear is engaging, not gratuitous, because it is presented a part of that old question: what, exactly, is evil?

Jodi Foster as Clarice Starling

I think the movie’s greatest accomplishment is that, despite the grandiosity of its subject matter, it manages to feel understated the whole way through. The scariest moment in the final sequence, when Clarice confronts Buffalo Bill, is not the scene where she sees his skin suits, but the scene where he contorts his face and asks of Clarice, faking ignorance of a previous victim, “Was she a very fat person?” It is scary because Ted Levine, as Buffalo Bill, perfectly captures the hairs-breadth difference between how that question would be posed by an innocent person, and by someone fucking crazy. It is way more unsettling than the half-decomposed body in the bathtub that we run into moments later.

Ted Lavine as Buffalo Bill, animal lover.

So, readers, I think I get it now. It is possible to make a great horror film if the point is not blood and guts, but if blood and guts are a necessary byproduct of a truly frightening inquiry of human darkness. Of course, it also helps if you have Anthony Hopkins and Jodie Foster leading your movie. But to make horror into art, you mostly just need to take Hannibal Lecter’s advice: “Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek?” 

Horrortober: Silence Of The Lambs (1991)

Categories
Cover Feature News

Julien Baker Arrives

It’s Saturday night at Otherlands Coffee Shop. The space looks about the same as it has for the past decade of weekend concerts. A small group of people drinking lattes or craft brews sits around the eclectically shellacked tables while Julien Baker takes the makeshift stage with her baby blue electric Fender. Behind Baker, plate-glass windows are beading with rain. Brake lights from passing vehicles roll over the room, the glare catching the metal plating of her guitar.

It has been a standard evening so far, as coffee-house singer-songwriter sessions go. A folk duo has played a few by-the-book ballads. People are talking quietly. But when Baker takes the mic — her guitar affixed to her tiny frame with a rainbow strap — the atmosphere of the place changes. It’s hard to say what exactly does it. Baker is five feet tall and looks, by her own admission, to be about 12 years old, though she turned 20 in September. She wears an unremarkable blue jacket and gray t-shirt, a look she has described in interviews as “level-one RuneScape clothes.” She’s up there alone.

Baker begins her set with a single guitar note, held for a long moment before she begins, in a quiet and urgent alto — “Do you think that there’s a way this could ever get too far?” — covering the question with reverb before abandoning it. “I know I saw your hand,” she continues, “when I went out and wrapped my car around the streetlamp.” She pronounces streetlamp sweetly, drawing it out, the way you’d fixate on something you loved.

The lyric is a reference to the time, when Baker was 17, that she drove her car off the road, shattering the windshield enough so that she was unable to see as a 25-foot-tall light pole crashed towards her. The concrete post split Baker’s car cleanly in two but somehow left her entirely untouched.

“Blacktop” — which will be the first track on her debut solo album, due out October 23rd — is a lonely song, maybe her loneliest, though it has some strong competition. When she asks, in the next verse, that some intervening divine, the same that saved her life, “come visit me in the back of an ambulance,” it is with the longing of something barely missed, rather than any certainty in her good fortune.

Andrea Morales

The feel at Otherlands, as Baker earnestly continues her set, gives definition to the phrase, “you could hear a pin drop.” If people were not paying attention before, they are now. Previously unremarkable environmental details — the rain outside and the hush of the room — seem pulled into Baker, collapsed into her intimate, pining music.

If VH1 ever makes a Behind the Music: Julien Baker, it will play out something like this: A small girl with a big voice grows up in the far suburbs of Memphis. She works a night shift through high school, spends her free time hanging out at the skatepark; she smokes cigarettes, plays hymns at her small church, and figures out an electric guitar in her dad’s living room. She forms a punk band with her friends. They call themselves “The Star Killers” and play all-ages shows in community centers and neighborhood pool houses. She gets a girlfriend, gets into drinking, gets some dumb tattoos. Starts touring when she isn’t in school. Applies herself. Makes it to state college, where she records a lonely record. The record is really good. People hear the record, share the record, and she gets signed. What’s next is history.

At least, it seems like that will be the case, if recent articles comparing Baker and her forthcoming solo album to Rilo Kiley or Natalie Prass and calling her music “equal parts agony and burgeoning wisdom” (NPR), “crushing” (Stereogum), “wise” (Vulture),”a study in contradiction, both fragile and steely at the same time” (Nylon) are on to anything.

Morgan Jon Fox, the Memphis filmmaker, describes hearing Baker’s music for the first time this way: “This very gentle young woman stepped up and started playing these songs, and it was one of these moments in life that genuinely felt golden, when you see something that is so special, and so fragile, that is just on the precipice of taking off.”

Fox went on to use selections from Baker’s forthcoming album throughout his most recent project, a miniseries called Feral, and cites it as perhaps his foremost influence for the project. “I got obsessed with it,” he says. “I listened to it while I was writing and in the car while I was finding locations. It’s lyrically just very wise beyond her years.”

It is easy to talk about the precocity of Baker’s music, since she is young, but just talking about the precocity makes it seem as if Baker is a 5-year-old playing sonatas to an auditorium. The image doesn’t convey how moving songs like “Blacktop” or “Go Home” (“The side of the road in a ditch when you find me,” sings Baker, “… more whiskey than blood in my veins”) are, and how Baker’s particular talents are as much emotional as they are technical.  

Andrea Morales

Downtown Murfreesboro, near Baker’s favorite record shop

“I’ve never really encountered somebody who has the ability to resonate so broadly with their songs,” says Sean Rhorer, whose label, 6131 Records, will release Baker’s debut. “I posted about it on Facebook, and my mom responded to it,” he laughs. “But then, dudes in punk bands who are associated with us are all about it as well. For me personally, it’s like I’ve listened to a song of hers 200 times and on the 200th time I am just in my car weeping. She has that ability.”

Pending the release of “Sprained Ankle” in the next week, Baker is doing what she usually does: going to class at Middle Tennessee State University, where she is studying to be an English teacher. She started school as a recording engineering major, but quit the program after a professor told her that if he was going to teach the class one thing, it would be to “take their passion and monetize it.”

“I guess I just believe in the lyceum model of education,” she told me when we met in Murfreesboro on a weekend in early September. “I think you should educate to build your intellect, not to make money.”

In the past few months, Baker has flown to Los Angeles to shoot a music video and to Richmond, Virginia, to record at Matthew E. White’s Spacebomb Studios, the same studio that produced Natalie Prass’ debut album.

She’s been on the radio, toured to New York, and played around 20 shows, both as Forrister and as Julien Baker. She’s currently keeping it together by drinking copious amounts of what she calls “AA-meeting coffee”, meaning the strong stuff (Baker is now sober by choice). When we met, I noticed that her hands were marked up with scribbled English assignments and Sharpied X’s for being underage from the two gigs she’d played in Memphis that week, driving the four hours back to MTSU in the early hours of the morning.

Andrea Morales

Baker in her room in Murfreesboro, where she studies literature

A year and a half ago, if you’d asked Baker whether she’d be trying to balance a burgeoning career and travel schedule with her schoolwork, she would have looked at you like you were crazy. The songs that make up her album were recorded as a one-off, a side project while she was away from her band. She illustrated the album cover and released it for free on Bandcamp. She didn’t think much of it. “Whatever happened with it, I was like, oh, cool,” Baker says.

People quickly started to share the album, including a video version of her song, “Something” — shot in a Memphis parking garage by local filmmaker Breezy Lucia — but it wasn’t until Rhorer and 6131 contacted her about a record deal that she realized what was happening. On her new label’s advice, she took the record down from Bandcamp until it could be mastered and formally released.

A favorite mantra of Baker’s comes from the high school days she spent around D.I.Y. house venue and record label, Smith7. “Let’s all fail together,” she repeated, as we drove around Murfreesboro. “At least we’ll have each other.”

The Smith7 shows were put on exclusively as benefits for charity; records produced without hope of material recompense. “We called it investing in people,” says Brian Vernon, the founder and backbone of the label, which has produced locally-familiar bands like Wicker, The Holiday, and Nights Like These.

It was a scene that taught Baker to be wary of the parts of the music industry that can, as she phrases it, “put best things to meanest use.” (A quote from Paradise Lost: “O little knows / Any, but God alone, to value right / The good before him, but perverts best things / to worst abuse, or to their meanest use.”)

But Baker is quick to acknowledge how fortunate she is at the moment; how, not that long ago, even this starter level of success seemed a distant hope. “Being able to support yourself with your art — that’s the dream, you know?” Baker mused. She sounds both hesitant and excited. “It sunk in for me when I was able to hand my roommate utility and rent [money]. I was like, ‘Wow, that’s real.'”

At Otherlands, Baker introduces herself this way: “I’m Julien, and I don’t mean to bum you out. That’s just the kind of songs I write.” She smiles and pushes back her messy blonde hair from her face, a tic. “You know, you sing about it, and you exorcise it.”

A guess at why the 20-year-old’s songs are so broadly resonant: They all take place at a familiar, perhaps universal moment of surrender. People connect with it. Her surrender is manifold — laid at the feet of the audience, an ex-girlfriend who left her in a parking lot (“I should have said something,” sings Baker, “but I couldn’t find something to say”), the friend who once picked her up as a teenager, drunk and lost, from the side of a highway, or an invisible God. She always starts slow, voice drawn out over echoey guitar. As the song builds, she allows for considerable tension, enough space left between verses that you think she might turn away or give up at any time.

But then there always is a moment, about halfway through, where it’s as if she makes an unannounced decision that this one is all or nothing, and suddenly she is pure energy. When you see her perform, I swear there is a point when she opens her mouth — I mean really opens it — and she appears to grow three sizes. “Like one of those little styrofoam things you put in water and then they get huge,” Morgan Jon Fox laughingly agrees. This shift is her simultaneous will-to-power and an invocation for the listeners to join her. She is no longer suffering alone.

The lyrical loneliness is variously romantic and existential, sometimes within the same breath. Baker, who says she “played the worship circuit” in high school, makes music about God, but is not a Christian musician, to the extent that Christian music is a well-defined and (in my heretical opinion) musically underwhelming genre. There are Christian music labels and Christian music festivals, and Baker is not a part of that scene, though she likes Underoath and Pedro the Lion and Manchester Orchestra — bands that have, more or less explicitly, copped to their love of Jesus. She was devastated when Mike Reynolds, the guitarist for Christian metalcore unit For Today, took to Twitter and declared, “There’s no such thing as a gay Christian.”

“Sometimes, I haven’t played that song,” she told me, referring to “Rejoice”, a tour-de-force and one of the best tracks on the forthcoming album, “because I felt I needed to hide a part of myself in order to not be made fun of.”

“Rejoice” begins with Baker wandering around her neighborhood: “Jumping the fence, veins all black. Sleep on a bench in the parking lot.” Her voice is low, almost gravelly. “Birthday,” she intones. “Call the blue lights. Curse your name when I find I’m still awake.” She continues, emphatic, underwhelmed: “choking on smoke, singing your praise” and, without much conviction, “but I think there’s a God, and he hears either way. I rejoice. And complain. I never know what to say.”

And then she backs up and basically shouts, as desperate as anything else: “I rejoice … But then why did you let them leave and then make me stay?” Her voice would break if it weren’t so strong.

The thing about it, the thing that gets me — despite the fact that I haven’t lifted up anybody’s holy name since I was in middle school and assigning sexier worship lyrics onto particularly handsome church camp counselors — is that, per Julien Baker, this shit is real as it gets. There is no pretense, no particular evangelism, just the barefaced results of a young woman who is searching. I don’t think you have to believe in anything, or come from any specific background, to respect the search, even to feel it deeply.

If there’s a mythos to suburban teens — especially punk kids from the suburbs, who, like Baker, grew up hanging out at indoor skateparks and smoking in big box parking lots — it is that they are bored. See: the Arcade Fire anthem “The Suburbs,” the chorus to which rejoinders, “We were already bored. We were already, already bored.” There’s an attendant feel — a beautiful and washed-out-in-a-basement-romance-while-smoking-weed-in-the-summertime sort of thing.

Baker does not seem bored or washed-out. Like her music, she comes off notably uncynical and deeply interested — in other people’s music, in workers’ justice (she uses her fluent Spanish to volunteer for an organization that assists immigrant laborers), in literature, in elementary education, in big questions.

“Why,” she asked me offhandedly in the middle of a conversation about Faust, a leaf-eared copy of which she keeps in her room next to a hot-pink record player, “were German writers so interested in water suicide?”

For Baker, making her music and trying to fix bad things in the world are inseparable ideas, though there is no particular proselytizing in her lyrics or sound. It is more about the hows and wheres and whos of the process. She’s a proud product of the Memphis grassroots, of the idea that you make things with your friends and do it for someone besides yourself.

And if she has a central fear about the recent attention her music has been getting, it is that she’ll have to change the way she makes music, that she won’t get to spend as much time writing with her band or crafting her own songs in basic anonymity.

“When you are in The Star Killers,” she says, “you have the liberty to do whatever you want, musically. The biggest fear is getting what you want and having it not be what you really want.”

But at Otherlands, surrounded by a crowd that the young musician has effortlessly transfixed, it’s clear that any apprehension on Baker’ s part won’t stop people from listening. Whatever she is putting out there, people who hear it are picking up on it.

As she finishes her set, Baker seems confident, ready, and, yes, somehow wise beyond her years. Most of all, it seems clear that she’s doing precisely what she was born to do.

“When I have these great opportunities,” she says, “I have to remember they are transient. But when it comes down to it, this is the only thing that makes sense to me.”

Categories
Art Art Feature

Is Loving Local the Wrong Approach?

Way back in 2013, there used to be a snarky Tumblr called “Commercially Unappealing” whose author (or authors) critiqued the Memphis art scene from behind the veil of anonymity. Though it is now defunct, the blog used to occasionally make some sharp judgments, among them, the thought that “there should be a moratorium on including the words ‘Memphis’ or ‘Southern’ in exhibition titles here.”

The post was a response to a reader-submitted question that queried, “What is the longest span of time that has elapsed in Memphis without there being an art show ABOUT HOW IT IS IN MEMPHIS? When you go to a city like, say, Denver, do you want to see a bunch of self-referential shit?”

“Memphis,” the harried reader concluded, must “find comfort in its regionalism.”

Regionalism. Ah, yes. The condition under which contemporary art made anywhere but New York, Los Angeles, London, and Paris must be qualified with some explanatory epithet. These qualifiers (he’s a Southern artist; that’s an Appalachian sculpture) serve a double purpose of both promoting a kind of exceptionalism (how folksy and real!) that protects the art from any actual contemporary critique and places it squarely beneath a kind of Mason-Dixon-y glass ceiling. Regionalism is the art world equivalent of introducing yourself as a “female writer” rather than just a “writer.” It’s a classic dilemma of people who have been treated as an underclass, who have had to craft their own narratives, failing an institutional embrace. And it’s not necessarily a bad thing. Southern arts are historically so identified not because they are lesser or greater, but because we offer something unique that is worth identifying at the outset.

It is good to acknowledge where you fit in history. But when — we female writers and Southern artists ask — does the label fail to serve?

In the case of Southern art, the answer is that we are overdue. Seventy years ago, there was ample reason for Memphis painters to identify first and foremost as “Memphis artists,” considering that they might rarely leave the tri-state area in their lifetimes, and most of what informed their art could be found in a 50-mile radius. Not so these days. We have Wi-Fi. Reddit exists. It’s not exactly breaking news that we live in a globalized world, a world from which so-called “regional” artists are inextricable.

So when you tell me that your art show is about “Southern arts,” I expect work with a narrowed gaze. It’s not that it is artistically wrong to paint cotton fields under a mottled blue sky. It’s just that there can no longer be any pretense that landscape painters in Memphis aren’t just as inspired by Instagram as they are by the Arkansas lowlands. It would be as telling to call your show “The Art of the South(ern Users of Google Image Search).”

Emily Ballew Neff, the new Brooks director, is all for opening up the conversation. Says Neff, “I’m a firm believer in cross-pollination, and Memphis has an ecosystem that I believe would benefit by greater exposure to international and national artists.” She maintains that a more international perspective, correctly executed, would “never be at the expense supporting our Memphis artists” but instead “will only elevate the art conversation in our city and lead to a more vibrant community artistically overall.”

Likewise, Urban Art Commission’s director Lauren Kennedy says, “I think there is a lot of room for Memphis to participate more broadly in the national arts scene. There are people making work, and big conversations are happening, but I don’t feel like we are as plugged into those conversations as we can be … I see that kind of interaction as an incredible growth opportunity for everybody.”

We can love our Memphis roots without limiting the reach of our arts. The best way to choose 901, as far as contemporary art is concerned, is to know that the sphere of creativity is not delimited by I-240.

Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

“Beholding and Being Held” at Crosstown Arts

This Sunday at Crosstown Arts, Joel Parsons will present a performance titled “Beholding and Being Held” that is part of the sculptor’s month-long exhibition “You are the Hole.” It involves “classical ballet, social dance, endurance, the surrogate performance or emotion, emergencies of feelings, and Celine Dion.” And holes, of course.

“You Are the Hole” — Parson’s collection of awkward, orifice-shaped sculptures paired with pale peach drawings and lovingly messy assemblages — is the artist’s first major solo effort in town, though Parsons teaches art at Rhodes and is a regular curator around town. He started the work that culminated in “You are the Hole” when he began seeing his partner, the Ballet Memphis dancer and choreographer Steven McMahon. “There was this language that [McMahon] spoke that I didn’t have access to,” Parsons says. “It became clear to me that this was a good way to talk about relationships.” Parson’s attempts at understanding are realized in improved pointe shoes (a halved and crumpled coke can bound by masking tape) and gauzy pink light fixtures.

‘You Are the Hole’ explores the theater of desire, abstracted.

Likewise, Parson’s performance, “Beholding and Being Held” will work some of the same themes as his precariously balanced artworks: vulnerability, messiness, trying to understand another person but failing time and again. Says Parsons, “Loving someone is about this attempt. This kind of blind groping in the dark toward them. Whether you really ever find them, I don’t know. But the attempt is important.”

Categories
Film/TV Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Horrotober: Rosemary’s Baby (1968)

FILM TITLE: Rosemary’s Baby (1968)

ELAPSED TIME: I watched it all.

WHY DID I STOP WATCHING? Rosemary cedes to Satan. Hail Satan!

Before we get started, I want to apologize. Apologize to myself because this isn’t a review of what I think may be my new favorite spooky movie, A Halloween Puppy, about a silly boy who accidentally magicks his mother’s boyfriend into an English Bulldog. D’oh! I’ve never actually seen A Halloween Puppy but if it is as good as A Talking Cat!?! — the other movie IMDB suggests for people who want to see A Halloween Puppy — it has to be great, right?

Or at least better, for my purposes, than The Exorcist, which I thought about watching last night but couldn’t because I think there’s someone living in my attic and/or my kitchen pantry. A bad, evil, possibly possessed person. I mean, I don’t know for sure, because if this person was living there, primed to kill me, they definitely wouldn’t reveal themselves until I decided to watch The Exorcist alone at midnight. It’s like a Schrodinger’s Cat thing. I’m sure you understand.

I don’t want to let you down (“I came here for CONTENT,” you are doubtless yelling now. “FILM WRITING CONTENT!”) so I watched Rosemary’s Baby. What a relief! Rosemary’s Baby isn’t scary, at least not like The Exorcist. There is a lot of portent, for sure. There is the telling murder of a young dope fiend who has been resuscitated and then possibly killed by a couple of weird old people, the Castevets, who live next door to Rosemary (Mia Farrow) and her husband, Guy Woodhouse (John Cassavetes.) And by the continued illusions to the death of children, all while the misty-eyed and dewy-skinned Rosemary avows her desire for a baby. There is that freaky half-lullaby theme that makes the first half of the movie (which, sans soundtrack, is exclusively about 1960s home design) into something foreboding.

But when the shit is actually going down, when Rosemary is raped by the Devil in a dream sequence (and to hide the truth her husband claims that he did it because he was “loaded” and “it was fun in a kind of necrophiliac way”?!?), the feeling isn’t so much fear is it is familiarity. The movie takes place on the very edge of the utterly normal, turning normal conversations about picture hangings into something slightly nefarious. Perhaps the scariest thing about Rosemary’s Baby is how, in the cumulative scene — when Rosemary discovers that everyone is, in fact, conspiring against her, and that she has, yes, birthed the son of the Satan — there is almost nothing, tonally, to differentiate it from a mundane cocktail party scene. Except that everyone is yelling “Hail Satan!” The movie ends with Rosemary learning she isn’t crazy, and then quietly realizing that she must accept her child and become crazy, because the world is crazy. Everyone she loves and knows is crazy.

It isn’t scary, but it is haunting. Especially considering Mia Farrow’s terrible real-life abusive marriage to Woody Allen, and the fact that director Roman Polanski eventually fled the country to avoid rape charges. And perhaps the most haunting thing about Rosemary’s Baby is not that it is about Satan, but that it is a hysterical rape myth (Satan, Polanski? Really?) constructed around a world that quietly condones the real deal.

On second thought, I’ll take The Exorcist

Horrotober: Rosemary’s Baby (1968)

Categories
Film/TV Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Horrortober: Night Of The Living Dead (1968)


OZ: Original Zombie


FILM TITLE:
Night of the Living Dead (1968)

ELAPSED TIME: 13:22

WHY DID I STOP WATCHING? Blonde lady discovered desiccated body

If there is one reigning moral in horror movies that I can really get behind, it is that a certain amount of forbearance when it comes scary shit will pay off in the end. See: the different between Barbra (Judith O’Dea) and her rube of a brother in the opening scene of Night of the Living Dead (1968.) Barbra and bro drive up to a rural cemetery in order to place a wreath on the grave of a dead relative. It’s a dreary scene, and Barbra’s hapless brother is all complaints: “A lot of good the extra daylight does us,” he says. “You think I want to blow Sunday on a scene like this?”

Judith O’Dea as Barbara.

Barbra, on the other hand, is reverent at the grave. Her brother teases her, recalling a time when they were kids and he scared her. Haha, he says when she winces, “You’re still scared.” Barbra demurs, but she easily could have responded, “No shit. There are fucking zombies in this cemetery, and they are about to kill you, you worthless scrub,” because that is the direction that everything goes. A big ole zombie, a sentient member of the 1960s undead (you can tell it’s the 60s because the zombie wears a suit and has nicely coiffed hair), emerges from over the hill and knocks out broseph. Barbra escapes the cemetery, at least for long enough to barricade herself in an old farmhouse.

The point here is that if you don’t tempt the undead by being a sarcastic jerk, you have a better chance of escaping when they come for you. So why — why?? — would I exercise anything but utmost caution and fear while reviewing a movie about zombies. “Ha ha, zombies are fake,” another critic might write, flaunting their critical thinking skills and rational brains. Not me. Memo to zombies: I think you’re very scary. Leave me alone, please.

So Barbra makes it to this half-lit farmhouse, where she grabs a knife from the kitchen. Nothing comforting about this place at all, except that it temporarily contains no zombies. (Aside about these zombies: they seem smarter, in general, than zombies do now. A little more expressive and mobile. The scariest contemporary zombie movie I’ve seen is Shaun of the Dead, but I can tell you that those zombies are dumber than 1960s zombies, which seems to bode ill for us as a culture. Even our nightmares are getting dumber.) Barbra makes her way around the farmhouse, climbs some stairs and sees a desiccated body, presumably of farmhouse owner. A body that is just eyes in a chewed out skull.

Our columnist did’t get this far into the movie.

For more information about this classic piece of cinema, I will refer you to the Rotten Tomatoes page, because I stopped watching at 13:22. “You’re so scared,” you might say, doing an impression of the guy who gets killed in the first 5 minutes of Night of the Living Dead. “I’m going to survive this horror movie we call life,” I say back to you as I stockpile peanut butter and duct tape in my cubicle. I’ll see you on the other side. 

Horrortober: Night Of The Living Dead (1968)

Categories
Film/TV Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Horrortober: Dracula (1931)

FILM TITLE: Dracula (1931)

ELAPSED TIME: 85 minutes (plus or minus a few in the middle)

WHY DID I STOP WATCHING? The Dracula was killed!

I’m not a fan of horror, but I find it hard to equate the mistily lit estates and silken gowns of Depression-era Dracula with “horror”. This movie is a horror as Miss Mina, Dracula’s would-be bride, pronounces it: “This horror,” she says, lifting pearly hand to porcelain face. The music swells. When Dracula’s three flapper brides leave their “earth boxes” and float eerily towards their caped husband, gruesome and Gatsby-ian, an undead convalescence seems almost attractive. I’m reminded of the essayist Leslie Jamison’s judgement that, in art, “The pain of women turns them into kittens and rabbits and sunsets and sordid red satin goddesses, pales them and bloodies them and starves them, delivers them to death camps and sends locks of their hair to the stars…. Violence turns them celestial.”

I watched an anniversary edition of this movie that was paired with a newish Philip Glass score, something I didn’t realize until halfway through the movie. I thought, “Wow, the 1931 version of Dracula sure does strike a lot of the same emotional notes as The Hours.” Glass’s score is quietly urgent and romantic, designed, as he put it, to fit the “libraries and drawing rooms and gardens” of the classic film. It lights on the mournful and disregards suspense. Even the freakiest of monologues (“Rats. Rats! Thousands! Millions of them! All red blood! All these will I give you if you will obey me!”), paired with Glass’s composition, feels more sad than scary.

Bela Lugosi is unlike anyone before or since as the sharp-toothed aristocrat from Eastern Europe. I found myself wondering whether my great grandfather’s generation actually had more corporeal stillness, or if Dracula’s unearthly composure was simply another facet of Lugosi’s mastery. His foil, the crazy-eyed Renfield (Dwight Frye), is as seething as Dracula is sadistically controlled. And then you have the strong-willed Van Helsing (Edward Van Sloan), a doctor whose strength of character allows him to embrace certain dark truths. “For one who has not lived even a single lifetime,” says Dracula, “You are a wise man, Van Helsing”

An uncle of mine, a fan of the vampiric, once made a point that has stayed with me— that Dracula is a sort of inverted Christ-figure. Instead of giving you his blood to drink, thus allowing for salvation, he drinks yours and keeps you away from heaven forever. So it is fair to see these characters eventual defiance of the Dracula as a heavenly allegory, as well as to accept the premise that to get to the light, you have to accept that real darkness exists. It’s an idea as transcendent as it is terrifying, which is probably why I made it through all 85 minutes of this one. I may not be as stolid with Dracula’s more recent incarnations. 

Horrortober: Dracula (1931)