Categories
Editorial Opinion

Hope and Change in Nashville?

Over the course of time — and quite a lot recently — we have had much to say about the Tennessee General Assembly’s annual legislative value judgments (if that’s not too oxymoronic a term). More than once, we have

characterized them in cartoons as hillbillies (and that was if we were feeling kindly.)

That kind of rude jesting on our part had actually begun well before the state’s voting population began its pell-mell rush to the flag of Tea Party Republicanism. Since that happened, beginning with the election of 2008, more or less, and proceeding geometrically in that direction ever since, we have often been stupefied — uncertain as to how much further we could go with such ad hominem characterizations without being considered either too rabid or, worse, guilty of gross understatement.

We’re still a little buffaloed, frankly, as to how and why the Tennessee GOP was able to expand so far beyond its East Tennessee hinterland, where a relatively genteel and moderate version of Republicanism had flourished since the Civil War, as a result of the region’s hill-country pro-Unionism, and how and why the party’s philosophy had shifted so far rightward.

Our puzzlement was amplified by the fact that those original advances into Middle and West Tennessee (in the direction of what was then called a “two-party system”) were facilitated by Memphis’ own Lewis Donelson, a genteel presence whose protégés — office-holders like Howard Baker and Winfield Dunn and the early version of Lamar Alexander — were thoughtful additions to a thriving political debate that for some gave Tennessee the reputation of a bellwether state, one that could go back and forth between the two major parties in tune with shifts in the regional and national mood.

All that began careening to an end in 2008, more or less simultaneously with the election and then the administration of an African-American president. Or maybe that was just a coincidence. In any case, Tennessee is now, like the rest of the South, and in some ways more so, resolutely red, with only trace amounts of Democrats, mainly in Nashville and Memphis.

But we have come to praise the General Assembly, not to bury it. Granted, in the last session, there was yet another gratuitous firearms bill, which our well-intentioned but, er, gun-shy governor signed into law after pointing out concisely its more dangerous attributes. And there was the expected bill adding new anti-abortion restrictions to state law. Worst of all, there was the refusal to accept a badly needed Medicaid-expansion bill, largely because the word “Obamacare” was attached to it by opponents.

On the plus side, this Republican super-majority legislature refused for the third year in a row to devalue public education with a school-voucher bill, approved a halfway decent educational-standards measure, rejected a Bible-as-state-book bill that would have trashed the barrier between church and state, gave the concept of medical marijuana a fair hearing, and, arguably best of all, came within a single vote — that of an absent Democrat — of approving in-state tuition allowances for children of undocumented aliens, with a bill that is said to be sure of passage next year (see Viewpoint).

All things considered, this is progress. Maybe something like a normal political spectrum has reasserted itself within the confines of our one-party state. We are entitled to hope.

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

What They Said (April 30, 2015) …

Greg Cravens

About Toby Sells’ cover story, “All About That Bass!” …

Nice article. I think the big miss is the absence of the trolley/street car to cart visitors from Bass Pro around downtown. Sorry, trolley buses (like Showboat buses) are just a sad and inexcusable replacement.

The street cars could have been a perfect device to get visitors out of the retail environment and into the city streets. I hope the Flyer will investigate what went wrong with the management of the trolley system.

BP

The lack of foresight in not having the trolleys operational by Bass Pro’s opening is borderline criminal. There is a trolley stop at the Pyramid I used to use to get back to my car after games.

Once Bass Pro opens, people in the parking lot should be seeing our trolleys go by every few minutes. They would pick up thousands of tourists who would get off on South Main or Beale Street and spend tourist dollars.

I give our city credit and generally ignore the naysayers, but the total mismanagement of the trolley shutdown makes me wonder about our leadership and vision. The trolleys are truly the glue and an incredible asset to the entire area. With Bass Pro opening, it’s just another huge missed opportunity as the trolleys sit idle.

Midtown Mark

The Bass Pro store on Sycamore View does a good business. Will its current clientele drive downtown to the new one?

Clyde

About Jackson Baker’s Politics column, “From Nashville to Memphis: A Venue Change” …

Brian Kelsey’s version of “liberty” is what you might expect from a person who grew up as a child of privilege in a wealthy family, was coddled even into adulthood, and has never had to worry about how to make a living, where he has to find the money to pay this month’s utility bill, or how he will go about getting a child educated on limited funds. He has nothing in common with regular people.

olemanrvr

About Bianca Phillips’ post, “Memphis Couple Will Travel to D.C. for Supreme Court Same-sex Marriage Case” …

Marriage, legally speaking (and we are talking about the law, not religious doctrines), is a contract between adults that, absent of another contract that says otherwise, joins them financially, makes them next of kin, and default reciprocal beneficiaries.

Under a system of gender equality, there is no good reason to deny that we must keep evolving until an adult — regardless of gender, sexual orientation, race, or religion — is free to share love, sex, residence, and marriage (and any of those without the others) with any and all consenting adults. Polyamory, polygamy, open relationships are not for everyone, but they are for some.

The limited same-gender freedom to marry is a great and historic step but is not full marriage equality, because equality “just for some” is not equality.

Keith Pullman

About Bianca Phillips’ post, “Bill Increasing Penalties for Animal Fighting Passes Tennessee Legislature” …

Amazing night vote: taking a tradition and cultural heritage such as cockfighting and putting such a penalty on it. Cockfighting has been an American tradition since it was founded, and no wonder we’re becoming a third-world country. Think back to the 1940s through the 1960s, when America was a great nation — and look what the government has done to it!

Papa Ritz

Totally agree, Papa. America’s decline is a direct result of our criminalization of such wholesome sporting activities as cockfighting. And night raids.

Jeff

Whenever I wonder what is the best course for this nation I ask myself, “What would a cockfighter do?” Then I head down to the slave auction and help the economy at the “Buy Two, Get One Free” sale.

crackoamerican

Categories
Editorial Opinion

Compromise Returns

Once in a while, even the most stiff-necked and tunnel-minded of people can somehow reach a compromise with people of another mind altogether. The phenomenon, which is increasingly rare in the political realm, actually

occurred twice in the past week — once in the United States Congress, and another time in the Tennessee legislature.

The first occasion was an agreement reached between Republicans in the U.S. Senate, now a majority in that body, and Senate Democrats, breaking a stalemate and clearing the way for a Senate confirmation vote on President Obama’s nomination of Loretta Lynch to be attorney general. There has not been, and is not now, any serious doubt as to Lynch’s qualifications. A deadlock between the two parties had threatened to turn into one of those endless GOP filibusters that have cursed the Congress ever since the voters of the United States dared to elect a Democratic president in 2008.

Ironically, it was the Republican takeover of the Senate in last fall’s election that may have created the preconditions for a deal. With Republicans now in charge of both legislative chambers in Washington and with an open-seated presidential election coming up in 2016, it behooves the GOP to demonstrate that it can accomplish things, not merely obstruct them.

What had impeded agreement on a nomination vote for Lynch was Republican insistence on adding anti-abortion language to another issue pending before the Senate, a measure to counter human trafficking — a noble and surely non-controversial goal in the pure sense, but one made complicated on the Republicans’ insistence on attaching the so-called Hyde amendment, forbidding use of federal funding for abortions, to the bill.

Their argument was that a component of the bill deals with medical care for victims of human trafficking, conceivably involving the abortion procedure and therefore subject calling for the Hyde restrictions.

Democrats objected that funding for the bill’s medical-care services was derived from private sources and hence inapplicable to the Hyde provisions. But until last week, the Republican leadership in the Senate was adamant: No Hyde amendment, no trafficking bill, and as a throw-in, no vote on Lynch’s confirmation. It was the sort of blackmail that has been routine for years. 

But lo and behold, the two parties agreed to some rthetorical tweaking of the bill — a bona fide compromise — that would change nothing substantial but allowed both sides to claim victory and, just as important, would allow both that bill and Lynch’s nomination to come to a vote.

What happened in the Tennessee legislature was in a way even more amazing, because the GOP super-majority there has no real incentive to compromise for the sake of a future-tense election. The issue there was legislation, approved by Governor Bill Haslam, which in theory would substitute home-grown Tennessee equivalents for the much-abused national Common Core educational standards that a substantial part of the General Assembly’s membership had sworn to throttle. The old standards have been tweaked, an “evaluation” committee has been appointed, and there’s a new name to it all. Voila! A unanimous agreement, allowing serious educational standards to continue to exist.

Ah, compromise! Welcome back.

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

What They Said (April 23, 2015) …

Greg Cravens

About Bruce VanWyngarden’s editor’s note, “NRA Foreplay in Nashville” …

Tennessee has far more vehicle deaths than firearm-related deaths. None of you want to outlaw texting/talking on the phone or enforce stricter DUI laws. Some people will have accidents with their firearms. Just like so many people have accidents in cars or playing sports. None of you pretend socialists actually care about saving lives – you are just anti-gun.

Jason

I’m hearing talk of a newly introduced bill designed for petting zoos, “Pistols for Peacocks.” I can hear the goats screaming in disgust already.

Dave Clancy

About the Flyer’s editorial on guns in parks legislation, “Veto It, Bill” …

Written like a true ingrained/naive civil rights bigot, and I never give the time of day to civil rights bigots. The real question that needs to be answered is just who at the Flyer anonymously wrote this slanted tripe? Someone needs to man/woman up.

Nightcrawler

Nightcrawler, someone using a pen-name and avatar is challenging someone else to man up?

CL Mullins

About Wendi C. Thomas’ story, “Cuba, Si!” …

I went to Cuba on a People to People trip in February. It was absolutely amazing! I want to go back to stay in some hotel particulares as opposed to the nationally owned hotels; although, the Hotel National in Havana was pretty amazing!

What really hit me is how the embargo has hurt not just Cubans, but Americans, too. Cuba has a pretty successful medical system. The country has its own biotech industry and has created a drug that is very successful in preventing amputations due to complications from diabetes. We have no such drug in the U.S. and won’t until the embargo ends.

CSH

About Jackson Baker’s post, “Haslam Remains Dubious About Bible Bill and Provisions of Gun Bill” …

I firmly believe that we should pass a constitutional amendment that anyone responsible for passing three laws that are later declared unconstitutional by the courts be removed from office. Call it the “Three Strikes for Dumbass Politicians” amendment.

Charley Eppes

Veto them both. I don’t think he will though, especially the gun bill. That would kill his chances of being chosen as a VP running mate this year since the Republicans are dependent upon the big gun manufacturers and their affiliate groups, mainly the NRA.

Olmanriver

About Bianca Phillips’ post, “Ultra-sound Bill Introduced” …

I grew up around many ultra-conservative Christians who were very anti-abortion … until they had a daughter get pregnant in high school. Then they were all about getting a convenience abortion so that little Sally didn’t have to put her life on hold. I knew a handful of girls at my high school whose parents made sure to get their daughter’s “issue” fixed, even though they were staunchly anti-abortion.

Personally, I don’t like abortion, but I do think it’s necessary, and I think it’s a better alternative to have it be legal than to have a bunch of coat hanger attempts and quack doctors performing these things.

GroveRebel84

About National Volunteer Week …

In celebration of National Volunteer Week, I am writing to recognize the residents of our community whose lives have been enriched through the feeling that comes from helping others. I encourage you to find a worthy cause with which to volunteer.

I give my time to the American Cancer Society because cancer has touched everyone in some way, including my family. To help others in their fight against cancer is truly humbling.

Volunteers have been the backbone of the American Cancer Society since its founding more than 100 years ago. They continue to provide the crusading spirit the society has needed to champion the fight against this terrible disease.

Latrice McLin

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

What They Said (April 16, 2015)

Greg Cravens

About Bianca Phillips’ post, “Tennessee Senate, House Committees Approve Bill to Make Bible Official State Book” …

I hope this is but the first step. Next we should have the State Bible Verse, the State Hymn, the State Church, the State Tongue in Which to Speak, and, finally, the State Serpent for Handling.

Jeff

I clicked on this headline fully expecting to see “Parody” tucked somewhere discreetly on the page. Seriously, is this real life?

NavyBlue

No, it’s not parody. Parody died in this Tennessee Legislature shortly after the right-wing clown car drove into Nashville. This is about pandering to the large segment of this state who couldn’t care less about such arcane concepts as, say, the First Amendment. They think the “establishment” clause is a liberal plot — if they’ve ever heard of it in the first place.

Kilgore Trout

I’m so glad that I live in a state with amazing education, no poverty, no unemployment, infrastructure in excellent condition, and a fully insured populace. It makes me feel better about paying our legislators to pass laws that do absolutely nothing.

csh

Bible today, Koran tomorrow. Thanks, rubes.

Crackoamerican

About Chris Davis’ cover story, “Godless in Memphis” …

Of all the headlines that were out there, all you could come up with was the “catchy” headline: “Godless in Memphis”?

With all the negative perceptions people from around the country might have of our city, here’s yet another one to add to their list: Memphis is Godless. Nice job keeping the Memphis reputation down.

What’s next on your headline list? “Hail to ISIS”?

Phil Grey

I want to publically thank the American Atheists for holding their national convention in Memphis. After recently reading with disgust Duck Dynasty‘s Phil Robertson fantasize about butchering an atheist family, I was a bit leery about the consequences for the many atheists left behind in Memphis. Would the convention manifest hostility and hatred toward atheists? 

The convention, however, went over without generating much controversy. And there were even a few positive articles about atheists, including the cover story, “Godless in Memphis,” in the Memphis Flyer. Thank you!

Jason Grosser

About the Flyer’s editorial “No to Vouchers” …

If vouchers are fair and good for Christian schools, why would atheist and/or Islamic schools not get vouchers paid for by public money?

Who will complain loudest when their tax dollars are vouchered away to the First Islamic High School? Or to the Midtown Free Thinkers Institute?

Claude Barnhart

About Bruce VanWyngarden’s Letter from the Editor, “NRA Foreplay in Nashville …

Public parks are not private property. If I have the right to carry a gun on the sidewalk, obviously I have the right to carry it in a park.

Jason

Thank you, Jason! It’s about time we did away with the unconstitutional tyranny of the Tennessee driving laws. If I want to do donuts in a playground in my SL550, then it is my right!

Ern

About Toby Sells’ post, “Sammons Approved as CAO” …

Wharton needed Sammons’ capabilities, which apparently far exceeded Little’s, and yet Little is so important to the administration that he will be working on what many consider to be the most challenging undertakings in the city. So what’s the real deal here?

Smitty1961

Categories
Editorial Opinion

The Firing Line

As we all surely know by now, there has been an outbreak of violence in the past couple of weeks, and the common denominator of it all was guns. There was the case, here in Memphis, of the two children — one sleeping “safely” in

bed, another engaging in harmless play — who were killed by gunfire unloosed by drive-by shooters going after God knows whom.  

What made the tragedy of those innocent deaths more unbearable was that they were arguably an instance of the law of averages at work. For there were numerous other instances of gunplay here last week, some cases of gang versus gang (it is likely that the two children who died were “collateral damage” of such a circumstance); others were instances of guns functioning as the favored show-and-tell instrument of holdup artists. With so much activity going on, it is increasingly difficult to stay out of the line of fire.

And there were several cases of guns going off inopportunely at the hands of law enforcement officers. In the case of the most universally seen one, Walter Scott, the errant driver in South Carolina who was stopped for having a defective rear light, was killed by Officer Michael Slager, who fired eight shots (eight shots!) from his firearm at the unarmed fleeing suspect. Scott, we subsequently learned, had no outstanding warrants against him; his crime was running from the arrest scene. In a horrific over-reaction, Slager killed him, and then tried to cover up his crime by framing his victim, dropping his taser on the spot and reporting that the dead man had tried to grab it.

And he’d have probably gotten away with it, if there hadn’t been a bystander to video it. If ever there was a cause for rejoicing at the ubiquity of cell-phone cameras, this was surely it.

Finally, there was the spectacle of last weekend’s convention of the National Rifle Association (NRA)in Nashville, where a dozen or so Republican pretenders to presidential status boasted of the glory of their personal weaponry (Lindsey Graham has an AK-47? For what?) and condemned President Obama for trying to place some sensible limits on gun use in the wake of the horrific 2013 Sandy Hook massacre.

Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, perhaps the most blatant political yahoo to appear in national life since the long-gone Joe McCarthy, went far beyond the others in toadying up to his NRA paymasters. He publicly defied Democratic presidential prospect Hillary Clinton to come pry his guns out of his — let us say, cold, closed mind.

Yes, Virginia, there is a Second Amendment. But just as, in all honesty, there was a time in American history when abusers gave the Fifth Amendment a bad name by using it to obstruct justice, the Second Amendment is now being perverted to the ignoble end of gun fetishism.

And that is what you call a clear and present danger.

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

What They Said (April 9, 2015) …

Greg Cravens

About the Flyer‘s cover story, “Godless in Memphis” …

I’m severely disappointed that the super cool Memphis Atheists knitting circle didn’t get mentioned! You’ll talk about the Dungeons & Dragons group but not the knitting circle? Misogyny!

Whitney Wood

There are a bunch of us out here that are humanist and do not have an external deity. I am getting bolder and bolder in telling people I am a humanist. It starts more positive conversations than describing myself as an atheist.

Carolyn Clemens

I totally agree with the Peabody. As long as they spend money in the city it is great to have them. Why even suggest that Memphis discriminate against them?

Shep Fargotstein

About Bryce W. Ashby and Michael J. LaRosa’s Viewpoint, “You Lose, Cruz” …

Ted Cruz was born in Canada. Thus, he can’t run for president in the USA.

Behrooz Sadeghi Naeini

If Ted Cruz was born in Canada, what difference does it make? The present occupant of the White House was born in Kenya! I’ll still vote for Cruz if he is the nominee.

Paul Gulley

Paul, I’m glad to see someone else making this point. As Senator Cruz correctly pointed out when this issue was brought up, as long as the mom is a citizen, her child is a citizen, no matter where the child was born.

Of course, Senator Cruz was talking about himself and his own mother. He (and many of his followers) once had and still have a very different opinion about the current president’s citizenship qualifications. But I’m glad to see that at least a few of the senator’s devotees have changed their minds and can finally let the old Birth Certificate issue drop.

It is illuminating, though, isn’t it? How many years have they pursued this non-issue? And how many millions of dollars have they generated by fund-raising on the question of the president’s birthplace? Enough, perhaps, to fund the presidential campaign of a man born in Canada?

Jeff

The hypocrisy that is Ted Cruz and the Republican Party. Senator Cruz kicked off his campaign to become the GOP presidential candidate in the 2016 election at a religious university. Talking about God and faith and, in the next breath, he tells the audience he will repeal the Affordable Care Act as president, leaving 16 million Americans without health-care coverage. Other Cruz pronouncements: Global warming is a conspiracy; he would abolish the IRS (what does the business community think about this?), and no more abortion rights for women.

Would a President Cruz represent you in any way, shape, or form?

Ron Lowe

About Chris Davis’ post, “Will the Tennessee Legislature Make it Illegal to Perform ‘Hamlet’ in Schools?” …

The only way to stop a bad person with a hoax device is a good person with a hoax device.

Oddly, the “Gun Free School Zones” act only covers people without a permit carrying guns to schools. If you’ve got a permit, you can carry the gun anywhere you damn well please.

Fancycwabs

I can take a gun to Marquette Park but can’t carry it on the sidewalk in front of Holy Rosary school on my way to the park?

Diversandsundry

Shouldn’t Dave Clancy have already said something about having seen Hoax Device open for Iron Butterfly back in the day?

Chris Davis

I saw the Imitation Firearm open for Guns N’ Parks at the Empty Chamber in Norman, 1989.

Dave Clancy

Categories
Opinion The BruceV Blog

Hockey Hair Forever

Though it doesn’t much matter down here in the land of hoops and SEC football, around much of the country, people are excited that the National Hockey League playoffs are about to start.

As a former denizen of Yankeeland and a diehard fan of the Pittsburgh Penguins, I post this photo, the ultimate example of what was known in the ’80s and ’90s as “hockey hair.” This is Jaromir Jagr, circa 1993.

And for comparison’s sake, I’m also posting this picture of my friend Herman’s dog. Mocha, circa 2015.

Who wore it better?

Categories
Editorial Opinion

Veto the Guns-in-Parks Bill, Governor

Little by little, Governor Bill Haslam is getting used to asserting himself vis-à-vis the Tennessee General Assembly. That’s the clear lesson of Haslam’s second term,

which began auspiciously at the turn of the year with a proposal to accept Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) — a consummation (worth some $1 billion in federal health-care funds annually) devoutly to be wished by the state’s hospital community, facing financial hard times and intolerable strains upon their emergency-room capacity. 

That proposal, called Insure Tennessee, was made the subject of a special session by the governor but was nipped in the bud by an adverse vote of an ad hoc Health and Welfare Committee of the state Senate, hand-picked by Lieutenant Governor Ron Ramsey, who had gotten used in Haslam’s first term to having his way with impunity. That did not deter Haslam from encouraging a bipartisan legislative coalition from bringing Insure Tennessee back up for another go-around. The proposal made it safely through two Senate committees but was next routed by Ramsey into a Commerce Committee known to contain sworn foes of the ACA (aka “Obamacare”), where it was killed again.  

When all else fails, though, the GOP’s ultras in Nashville put their energies behind whatever new bill they can find that extends even further the gun lobby’s efforts to shrink what remains of local governments’ effort to control unbridled firearms use within their jurisdictions. Here again, the governor is attempting to put the brakes on. 

The latest gun bill gathering steam in the General Assembly would not only strike down the prerogatives of local jurisdictions to restrict the presence of firearms in public areas — a clear assertion of the “less-government” party’s ongoing contempt for local authority — it would, as a result of a Senate amendment, allow gun-permit holders to strut around the state capitol grounds fully armed. Such is the reigning schizophrenia in Nashville that the shocking amendment was approved both by opponents of proliferating weaponry, who thought the amendment was so outrageous that it might sink the whole bill, and, at least in the Senate, by gun enthusiasts whose motto toward any extension of firearms seems to be the more, the merrier. 

To its credit, the state House of Representatives has thus far rejected the guns-on-capitol-grounds provision, and the bill is next due for a House-Senate conference committee, where an effort will be made to reconcile competitive versions. 

Once again, Haslam demurs. He has made explicit threats to veto the measure altogether and has said, sensibly enough, “This bill isn’t so much a Second Amendment issue. It’s a property issue,” and he has urged “mayors and county commissioners and park directors” to assert themselves regarding the pending measure. 

We’re all for this newly resolute version of our governor, and we hope he’s prepared to back up his words with the liberal use of his veto pen.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

County Sausage

In a somewhat surprising take on the nature of his job, Shelby County Mayor Mark Luttrell on Tuesday described his relationship with his legislative body, the Shelby County Commission, as an “adversary relationship.” In

an address to the members of the Rotary Club of Memphis at the University Club, Luttrell said he’d offered that description as an alternative way of looking at things to an observer who’d asked him about his “contentious relationship” with the commission. 

“We do get worked over,” the mayor acknowledged about the relationship between his administration and the commission (which, it must be said, has often nursed a fair number of feuds and internal divisions within itself). “But,” said the mayor, and it was a crucial “but,” that kind of relationship “is in concert with what the founding fathers devised.”

In other words, the system of checks and balances that was built into the Constitution seems to have carried over into the governing practices of our nation’s various subordinate institutions, as well. Everybody is everybody else’s watchdog.

A case in point was Monday’s commission meeting, when the bone of contention was a plan devised by the county administration, faced with forthcoming reductions of $1.9 million annually in state funding for the county’s incarceration here of state prisoners. The administration had presented a plan whereby it would recoup most of that expected deficit by outsourcing Corrections Center food services to the Aramark Corporation, which would endeavor “in good faith” to re-employ as many as possible of the current 31 workers employed in food services, while the administration would seek to relocate those who were not rehired in jobs elsewhere in county government.

The commission’s discussion of this plan was touch-and-go, especially since sincere and vociferous complaints were heard early on from some of the affected employees, and since the issue, by its nature, was the sort that would invite party-line differences on the commission, divided 7-6 between majority Democrats and minority Republicans. There was a tendency among the Republicans to mount stiff upper lips, sigh, and describe the situation as one of making the best of a bad situation. That was balanced by an outcry among several Democrats that the workers were being thrown under the bus. But there was a middle ground, made evident from the start by the fact that one Republican, Terry Roland, and two Democrats, Van Turner and Willie Brooks, headed in opposite rhetorical directions from those of their party-mates.

Not that there wasn’t some invective thrown about, along with charges of duplicity and deceit, along with intermittently serious tension between the two sides and between county CAO Harvey Kennedy and Democratic critic Eddie Jones. But in the end, with some amendments attached to the proposition that cemented the guarantees of continued employment for the food-services employees, the adversarial atmosphere had served to clarify and complete the proposed arrangement in the form of a legitimate compromise.

Critics of American government often make the comparison to law-making to the unpleasant process of sausage-making. But ideally that very process is what makes the end result digestible and, with any luck, easy on the system.