Categories
Film Features Film/TV

UNIVERSAL PLIGHTS

When Renee Zellweger was cast as the stumbly, bumbly title character in the film version of Helen Fielding s wildly successful Bridget Jones s Diary, there was some xenophobic grumbling that this American could not play such a resolutely English figure.

But this bit of thinking ignores the fact thatBridget Jones s Diary flew off the shelves in England and the U.S., for Bridget Jones plight is universal or if not universal, maddeningly common. Fielding zeroed in wickedly on poor Bridget, a lovely enough woman, albeit a smidge puffy from too much booze, cigarettes, and sweets, and drew her as one of the more pitied creatures of our time: the unmarried woman in her 30s. Sure, Bridget s got a good enough job doing P.R. for a publishing house; she s got friends; she s even got a decent relationship with her folks. But without a man well, as the smug marrieds say, tick tock.

This is where Zellweger comes in. If she s not a natural comedienne, then she s certainly game. The weight added to her bony frame doesn’t necessarily make her fat, but she does jiggle. And she trips. And she drunkenly sings. And she blurts out inappropriate notions only to garble some more until she mumbles to a red-faced silence. For Bridget, life is a series of humiliations punctuated by small triumphs followed by worse humiliations. In the novel, Bridget seeks a cure by thumbing through self-help books aimed at bringing inner-poise. For the paper Bridget, attaining that poise would be akin to her suddenly sprouting wings and flying. Yet, through some accident of DNA or perhaps a sunny upbringing, Zellweger oozes poise. Even as the sloshed Bridget falls face first out of a cab, Zellweger is the very picture of poise.

Perhaps the filmmakers first-time director Sharon Maguire and writers Fielding, Four Weddings and a Funeral s Andrew Davies, and Emma s Richard Curtis recognized this unfortunate trait in Zellweger and fairly excised the word. They streamlined the book, reducing Bridget s maniacal diary-entry list-making and omitting a complicated plot twist involving her mother. Instead, they focus to good effect on the follies of poor unmarried Bridget, on those tiny insults that are unfortunate though utterly amusing.

Bridget doesn’t wear her heart on her sleeve. She wears it in the form of a delicate charm dangling from a chain around her neck. The film opens on New Year s Day. Bridget, hungover, is attending her parents’ annual turkey curry buffet and is feeling chagrined at being cajoled by her mother into wearing a matronly, ruffle-collared outfit and being introduced to her neighbor s son, Mark Darcy (Colin Firth), a distinguished lawyer who greets her with disdain. No matter, for the next day she strolls into work wearing an impossibly short skirt that is met with flirty and dirty e-mails from her deliciously naughty boss, Daniel Cleaver (Hugh Grant). Emboldened and proactive, Bridget returns the next day in the same skirt and a see-through top. One thing leads to another, Daniel sees her girdle, and they jump into bed. The only things spoiling Bridget s coital bliss are the frequent run-ins with Mark Darcy, who seems to judge her with his tight lips, and the fact that her mother has left her father to take a job on a home-shopping program and to take up with an overly tan foreigner.

There s more, of course, since nothing can ever be easy for Bridget. She is a walking disaster with a self-effacing charm that we can t help but root for. Poise aside, Zellweger takes all the embarrassment, soldiering on, drink in one hand, cig in the other. Grant is well-cast as the devastating Daniel Cleaver, while Firth smartly takes on Mark Darcy as the alter-ego of Bridget, correct where she is off, reserved where she is bubbly, so that they click just so.

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

THE MEXICAN

The coupling of Julia Roberts and Brad Pitt in the romantic comedy The
Mexican
is right on the money — that is, bags and bags of money that this
casting decision will most certainly bring in. The film’s coupling of cutesy
and killing, however, is less of a sure thing. At the same time, being off-
kilter is probably its best asset, a definite detour from the unbearable mush
of this film’s ilk.

But boy is The Mexican wobbly, as wobbly as Roberts trying to high-tail
it in a series of wedge sandals her character is made to wear throughout the
film. And it begins without promise in Roberts and Pitt’s first full-fledge
scene together as they act entirely with their hands. Sam (Roberts) and Jerry
(Pitt) are fighting. Sam wants to go to Vegas; Jerry has one last assignment
for a mob boss. Sam screams that Jerry promised to go to Vegas (hands up).
Jerry pleads for reason (arms outstretched) that if he doesn’t go to Mexico
and fetch a certain pistol he’ll end up dead. More limbs fly and they part
ways: Sam to Vegas, Jerry to Mexico.

Separated, both Roberts and Pitt get to work their not-
altogether-different shticks. Sam is a mess of curls and a mess of ideas that
has her highlighting self-help books searching for the answer to Jerry, while
she doesn’t have a clue about herself. Jerry, on the other hand, knows where
he stands, but he keeps tripping alot. The world, it seems, is his banana
peel, filled with fender-benders, disobedient animals, and errant bullets.
Both Jerry and Sam are adorable.

What happens to them isn’t so sweet. As Jerry makes his way to
the pistol, Sam is followed into an outlet-mall bathroom (FYI, bathrooms
figure heavily in this film) by a man with a gun. This man, in turn, is
followed by a man with a gun. Man #2 shoots Man #1 and takes Sam as collateral
to get to Jerry. Meanwhile, Jerry retrieves the pistol, loses the pistol, gets
it again, gets thrown into jail, rides a donkey, etc.

As romantic comedies go, the comedy in The Mexican is
light, the romance even lighter. Regarding the latter, Roberts and Pitt spend
the bulk of the film apart. When together, their chemistry abounds with
chumminess but lacks a true spark.

The comedy is chiefly trite and sometimes offensive. A bit that
runs throughout the film mocks the overtherapized couple. In that first fight
mentioned above, Sam and Jerry throw out phrases like “blame-
shifting.” The gag continues as Leroy (James Gandolfini), Sam’s
kidnapper, analyzes her and she him. Even south of the border, Jerry and
coworker search deep for the meanings of their actions. The joke is that even
tough guys have feelings, or maybe it’s just an extended tribute to The
Sopranos
.

As Sam and Leroy grow closer, the light-hearted taking-it-as-it-
comes tone gets seriously strained. Before you can say Stockholm Syndrome, Sam
is resting her head on Leroy’s shoulder, wheedling out of him that he’s gay (a
gay hitman, what a hoot!) and encouraging him to love again. Sure, he’s a
cold-blooded killer, but besides that he’s not so bad. It’s around this time
of Sam and Leroy’s bonding that a bit about a rape is thrown in for comic
effect, proving that rape is never something to joke about.

And that’s about it for The Mexican — gentle laughs mixed
in with brutal situations with a few missteps here and there. As it happens,
the catchphrase of this film is the question, “When is enough
enough?” It refers to the screwed-up relationship of Jerry and Sam. But
in terms of this movie and the audience, The Mexican is just that —
enough.