Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

How aromas get into wine

I kill a tree every year. Despite my environmental inclinations, I buy a real Christmas tree to celebrate the holiday. I just can’t get excited about a fake one with no pine smell. I suppose a fir-scented candle might impart some realness to the plastic-and-metal imposter, but my psyche would invariably suffer.

Ever since I was a kid, I’ve had a freakishly perceptive sense of smell. I loathed onions growing up and could smell them sautéing a block away. I’d come galloping into the kitchen, bitching about the bulbous offender, and insist that Mom cease her noxious cooking. But my once-troublesome nose serves me well as a wine writer as I thrust it into wide-mouthed glasses, breathe deeply, and wax philosophic.

Oddly fragrant smells flood from my childhood memories, like cat pee, soft leather couch, and even caramelized onions. But you don’t need an overly sensitive schnoz to analyze aromas. You can start your own memory-driven smell vocabulary — be it bong water, sweaty socks, or overcooked asparagus — or innovate using the conventional catalog of wine descriptors as your springboard.

Traditionally, aromatics originate from three places: the grape variety, the place where it was grown, and the oak with which it comes into contact. Hidden in the grape skins are the fruitiness, tannins, and color needed to coax character into the sweet juice. Aromas such as black cherry and spearmint in Cabernet Sauvignon, raspberry and blueberry in Pinot Noir, and grapefruit or peaches in Sauvignon Blanc all emerge from this soft, succulent casing.

You can also sniff ripe red cherry instead of black cherry in Merlot and earthy black pepper in Syrahs, Zinfandel, and Cabernet Franc. But move the Syrah vine to Australia (where it magically gets renamed Shiraz), and a new slew of indigenous scents emerge, like eucalyptus and bright minerality. Or who can forget the funky, wet-earth smell reminiscent of dog crap in wines from South Africa? This difference stems from terroir.

Originating from French, the untranslatable word terroir (tair-WAHR) encompasses all the natural factors involved in grape growing — sun, rain, altitude, and soil characteristics. Soil variation derives from millennia of climatic changes, volcanic activity, and limestone settlements that seep flavor into the vine’s roots growing through the layers of sediment. The other factors — sun, rain, and altitude — contribute ripeness and character, depending on location. This concept of terroir is why the French parceled their land into quality-designated plots, or appellations, realizing that fruit from one vineyard bears a personality different from the grapes grown 50 yards away. In the United States, we call these plots American Viticultural Areas, or AVAs.

Other aromas are introduced with a natural yet manipulated instrument. Oak, used during the fermenting process as well as for aging, is a tool winemakers spend careers perfecting. Those vanilla, butterscotch, and caramel flavors in your Chardonnay? French or Hungarian oak. American oak, used almost exclusively for red wines since it can kick the shit out of white, imparts dill, scotch, and tobacco flavors.

But it’s important to note that not every nose or mouth will smell or taste the same thing. I’m particularly sensitive to certain aromas — green pepper, pine, wet slate, black cherries, black pepper, vanilla, and, yes, cat pee — because my memory relates to them, but each person carries their own smell baggage. Using standards but also noticing what you whiff in a wine, you can develop your own descriptive vocabulary — even if it’s sautéed onions in butter.

Recommended Wine

Lockwood 2005 Merlot Monterey (California) — The smell alone will attract wine lovers from miles around, like a tomcat to a desirous female. Elegant, soft, and sexy with jammy raspberries, blueberries, and mellow tannins. $12

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

The Wines That Bind Us.

Far from today’s romance-infused experience, weddings, up through the Middle Ages, were about politics and survival. Families united in economics and power, love be damned. But in this modern age, amorous couples, after the maudlin ceremony and the raucous party, fend for themselves after exchanging vows. This month, I will be entering into this social and legal rite, binding myself to a man for, hopefully, life.

Organizing the wedding ritual, we’ve rejected many silly traditions like the ridiculous garter toss and deflected numerous parental supplications, but to be honest, the hardest thing hasn’t been juggling the guest list or the family — it’s been choosing the wines. Many curious folk have inquired what this wine critic will serve at her own wedding, and, naturally, the pressure to deliver is quite palpable. Then that minor issue of budget hangs in the air. I’m, ahem, an older bride, so my parents aren’t exactly shelling out like I’m a 22-year-old. Satisfying the wallet and the palate has been a soul search.

The bubbly is perhaps the most important decision. In celebration, people will be swilling it all night, and serving a better one helps avoid hangovers. Caterers and halls normally offer limited (and quite average) wine selections, so inquire about outside purchasing like I did. Buying in bulk without a huge markup offers a significant cost savings. Although you might incur a dreaded “corkage fee,” weigh the cost difference as well as the enjoyment factor. Don’t bitch about this. Corkage fees (ranging from $3 to $20 per bottle) cover the overhead costs a caterer incurs for the wine service. But fees are, however, highly negotiable.

If budget wasn’t an issue for me, I’d pour Schramsberg Vineyards, a fantastic Sonoma Valley sparkling wine house. But at about $35 a bottle, this 38-year-old balked. I finally decided on Domaine Carneros Brut, the delicious California outpost of France’s Taittinger, which hurts less at $20 — before retail markup. If you need something even less expensive, there are excellent alternatives around $10 — Italian Prosecco (Mionetto) or Spanish Cava (Segura Viudas Aria).

Since my betrothed and I are both wine geeks, our reception is a three-course wine dinner. A hefty food base cushions the evening’s drinking agenda. And we love to eat, as do our friends and family. On the menu is lemony and dry Altanuta 2006 Pinot Grigio ($17), fruity yet robust Bonny Doon 2004 Syrah le Pousseur ($15), minerally and soft Joseph Drouhin 2005 Chablis Domaine de Vaudon ($22), earthy and bold Marchesi di Barolo 2003 Barolo ($45 — our splurge wine — second mortgage?), and a slightly sweet and fizzy Beni di Batasiolo 2005 Moscato d’Asti ($14) for the wedding cake.

For the infamous cake toast, serve a sweeter sparkling wine rather than a dry brut. The sugary smack of the cake will turn a brut pungent and flat. Look for bubblies that say “Extra Dry” or “Demi Sec” on the label. Ideal choices (if budget isn’t an issue): Iron Horse Wedding Cuvée ($34), Moët et Chandon White Star ($30), or Banfi Rosa Regale ($17).

Sit-downs for more normal couples can be much simpler. Two wines: one white, one red. Choose a lighter, more acidic Sauvignon Blanc over Chardonnay, since it generally melds better with food. For reds, the widely appealing and lighter Merlot fits both lightweight Aunt Mae and alcoholic Uncle John. Same goes for stand-up receptions and buffets, but add more variety — at least two reds and two whites.

When determining how much to buy, remember there are about five glasses in each wine bottle and about six in a sparkling. With dinner, count on one glass of wine per person, per hour (but this certainly depends on the crowd’s party-heartiness). During a reception, calculate two glasses if it’s wine and beer only, one less if you’re serving other alcoholic beverages. However, these estimates depend on how much activity you have going on — bored people will probably drink more to dull the pain. And you really don’t want to have that kind of wedding.

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

The Supertaster Unveiled

Ask 100 people if they’d want to be “supertasters” and probably 99 of them would say yes. We have Superman, Superwoman, Supergirl (well, she was killed off, but she was still cool), so you’d think supertasters would have superpowers, right? It sounds so appealing, like living in a delicious, taste-enhanced world, and I, of course, fancied myself a super-mega-taster, able to describe a wine in a single bound. But as the theory came to light, I quickly realized a wine critic doesn’t exactly want to brag about this.

The term originated in the mid-1990s, when research revealed that some people possess a powerful sensitivity to bitterness. The study estimated 25 percent of the entire world’s population are supertasters (mostly female), 50 percent are normal tasters, and the remaining 25 percent fall into the nontaster category. The three slots divide along gender and racial lines, with 35 percent of Caucasian women fitting the super bill, but Asians, Africans, and South Americans also heavily weigh into the super class.

Despite the name, to be a supertaster isn’t so super — it’s actually a prison sentence to a uniquely overintense experience. We’re not talking about an ecstasylike, feel-good intense but a gag-reflex intense. One out of four people has more fungiform papillae on their tongue — the little bumps on the surface that house your taste buds — rendering them intolerant to many foods. Basically, they taste too much. Anything bitter, such as black coffee, Scotch, grapefruit juice, or most vegetables, supertasters avoid. And really sweet items, such as artificial sugars or spicy foods also taste too powerful. Sooo … basically, the foodstuffs that please my palate, they can’t stomach.

The reasoning could lie in the bumps. Back in Paleolithic times, we needed more sensitive receptors on our tongues to determine if scavenged food was edible. As we evolved, the increased number of receptors became less and less useful, so, apparently, we’re phasing them out — 75 percent of us already have.

To determine if your annoying “sauce on the side, no broccoli in my sautéed vegetables, can you make sure that’s not Thai hot” habits could actually be the result of your super tongue (and not, as your mom said, your “pickiness”), there are ways to test yourself. One way is applying an apparently nasty medicine (which treats hyperactive thyroid), propylthiouracil, to your tongue and analyzing your perceptions. Most people can’t perceive any flavor at all, but supertasters shudder from the terribly bitter substance. A much easier way is to apply a small dab of blue food coloring on the tip of your tongue and count the pink bumps. The denser the bumps, the higher likelihood you are a supertaster — 64 per square centimeter is the average taster.

If I were a supertaster, which I am thankfully not — I have a career-saving, generic tongue — I probably wouldn’t be a proficient wine critic. (“Way too much fruit, offensive acids, and tannins. Where’s my favorite boring, tasteless Chardonnay?”) Plagued with too many buds, I’d be overwhelmed by all my favorite foods: green tea, fruits, vegetables, and, of course, wines of all flavors — alcohol tastes quite bitter and irritating to a supertaster. They lean toward the bland (light beer, anyone?), and their sensitivity to acidity keeps them far away from astringent Sauvignon Blanc, Spanish Albarino, or Pinot Noir. Even the sensation of alcohol sets off their touchy tongues — so don’t expect to find Listerine in their medicine cabinets.

Recommended Wine

Pewsey Vale 2006 Riesling Eden Valley (Australia) — Rieslings in Australia almost always taste clean and bright, with complex petrol flavors. Pewsey Vale is no exception. Vibrant, tart lemon-lime and elegant tropical fruit with soft, even acidity. $16

taylor.eason@cln.com

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

Rosé Rising

‘Tis time again for my annual pimping of pink. I’ve been on the proverbial wine box about rosés for several years, throwing my body up against a wall that only now is beginning to budge. This year, rosés decorated a one-page spread in The New York Times food section as well as the cover of Wine Spectator, and even burly men are deigning to drink this blushing wine worthy of respect.

And by rosé I don’t mean white Zinfandel, the culprit that caused Americans to shun pink for years while men and women in Europe guzzled it like Budweiser at a Memorial Day picnic. Today’s rosés are dry to off-dry (a tiny bit of sweetness), tart, and filled with watermelon, strawberry, and raspberry aromas and flavors. What’s not to like? Food-friendly, acidic, and fruity, they pair perfectly with summer meals and outdoor gatherings. Throw a couple of bottles in a cooler (many are screwtop, avoiding the clumsy corkscrew) and head to wherever the summer breeze blows you.

Rosés come about their color in a very natural way. Most winemakers create tint by allowing the juice from red grapes to sit with its skins for a few hours. All grape juice, no matter if the fruit appears white or red, starts out clear. Rosé wine attains a darker shade when the red grape skins stew with the juice for days or weeks, imparting a pink to reddish color. Darker rosés indicate the winemaker kept the juice sitting longer with the skins, coaxing more tannins into the wine to give it more oomph and structure. Not that you have to scrutinize these wines. Rosés are meant to be enjoyed without thought or analysis.

You can pretty much make rosé from any red grape, with my favorites coming from Syrah, Grenache, and Zinfandel (wineries fearing the “White Zin” moniker call theirs “Zinfandel Rosé”). Cabernet Sauvignon is also on the rise as a winemaker’s grape of choice. The most famous pinks come from the Provence and Languedoc regions of France, where carafes filled with blushing wine dot outdoor café tables. And, unlike many French selections, high-quality rosés come pretty cheap. Most run between 10 and 15 bucks, depending on the label and a store’s price markup.

Rosés are meant to be consumed fresh, within a year of bottling, so don’t put them on the rack and forget about them. Look for the astounding 2006 vintage when shopping and drink them cold like you would white wine.

White Zinfandel remains one of the top-selling wines in the U.S., so there’s still plenty of sweet pink. This flavor comes from adding sugar or stopping fermentation before the sugar has been transformed into alcohol. Dry rosés’ sugar gets eliminated through complete fermentation, yielding higher alcohol content. One reliable, yet not infallible, method of determining whether a pink packs a sugar wallop is looking at the alcohol content, usually located on the front label. Those with higher alcohol content, normally between 12.5 and 14.5 percent, are dry, and sweeter wines come in at 10 to 12 percent.

New York and San Francisco, two trendsetting cities for wine consumption, have been enjoying the pink stuff lately. Sell-out crowds at events featuring solely rosé wines indicate its growing popularity. Rosé is finally hip — join the party and drink pink.

I recommend trying a variety of rosés. You’re pretty much safe quaffing any from France, where all is dry. A few American gems to look for: Hamacher Pinot Noir Rosé (Oregon, $14); Vina Robles Roseum (Paso Robles, $13); Falcor Rosé (California, $15); Solo Rosa Rosé (California, $13); Pedroncelli Zinfandel Rosé (Sonoma, $13).

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

Bag It

When dining out at a nice restaurant, those of us who don’t make six figures sometimes have a painful decision to make:

Buy a woefully inadequate bottle of $8 retail wine outrageously hiked up to $30 or splurge and suck up the $50 cost of a decent bottle.

Though not all restaurants add 300 to 400 percent to a wine’s retail cost, the steep markup is a pretty common practice in our capitalistic country. It pisses me off regularly, but restaurants do have staff, insurance, and utilities to pay.

There are, however, solutions to our suffering: Bring your own wine.

Say there’s a special bottle you’ve been aching to drink and you want to pop it at a restaurant, or maybe your local Thai joint doesn’t exactly carry a stellar wine selection of Rieslings (or anything, for that matter). A carefully chosen brown bag can be your meal savior. Not all restaurants embrace bring-your-own (and I’ve rarely seen it publicized), but increasing numbers are okay with it, provided you pay a small service charge called a “corkage fee.”

Corkage fees vary from restaurant to restaurant, with average costs ranging from $5 to $20. The fee helps cover costs, not to mention the loss of profit. It’s a fair deal all around.

There is, however, strict etiquette to follow. If you practice good corkage, the server or sommelier may decide to waive the corkage fee and let you off with a freebie.

Do’s and don’ts for BYOW

• Call ahead to the restaurant to make sure it allows you to bring wine. Ask up front what the corkage fee is. If it tops $20, rethink the decision or at least bring in a wine worth more than that. Chances are the staff will oblige since you didn’t assume it was okay. And remember, they don’t have to allow it — consider it a favor.

• Don’t bring in something that’s already on their wine list. The point is to bring something they don’t offer.

• And since you’re reaching into their pockets a bit, don’t be obnoxious by toting in something cheap. The general rule is to bring a wine that costs at least as much as the corkage fee.

• Offer your server or sommelier a taste of your wine. This is the number-one way to suck up.

• Tip the server respectably for the wine you brought, since they did open and serve it for you. Bear in mind, you don’t need to drop 20 percent if you brought a $500 bottle of Bordeaux.

• If you drink a second bottle, make sure you buy it off their wine list. This shows you’re not a cheap ass.

With proper etiquette, BYOW is a beautiful budget balm. Drink better, splurge on that filet in wild mushroom sauce, but tip your server well.

Recommended Wines

Chateau Souverain 2005 Chardonnay Sonoma Valley — Although a tad expensive, hardcore oaky-buttery Chard fans will love this. Loaded with peaches and a lemony aftertaste. $17

J Lohr 2005 Seven Oaks Cabernet Sauvignon Paso Robles — Incredible value for a sophisticated, hearty wine with blackberry, baked cherries, and leather. $13

corkscrew@creativeloafing.com

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

Taste the Passion

Gifting expensive wines can make you a hero, but are they worth the money?

Although I’d love to enthusiastically proclaim, “Always!” I couldn’t do it without laughing. In some cases, gobs of money are poured into creating a wet-dreamy winery to produce a $100 wine.

They blow millions of dollars hiring the “best” winemaker, cultivating or buying the “best” fruit from the “best” vineyards, building an opulent winery with the “best” view and buying the “best,” most “advanced” equipment to impress the foolish rich people who pull strings to secure “appointments” to purchase the wine.

The whole thing is contrived, like those atrocious “planned communities” that dot our once-pastoral suburban landscapes.

But then there’s the genuine way to create wine: a lone, determined guy slaving over a fermentation tank in a nondescript Napa warehouse park who crafts a toe-curling, kick-ass Cabernet, labels it “Joe’s Cabernet,” and sells it for $60 (of course, once the rich folks get wind, as in the case of Screaming Eagle winery, the price skyrockets the following year). It completes the scene if his kids help with the project and his wife runs the winery. In both scenarios, the wines are expensive, but one just tastes more authentic to me. Can’t imagine why.

Although a bottle of Opus One, Silver Oak, or [insert fancy California winery here] would work as a gift, it’s the passion I seek, not the glitz. I give wines that reflect the anxious pride in every drop, delivering layers of flavor the winemaker lovingly coaxed into the juice. Not all of them are smaller wineries; some just might be larger wineries that wish to keep their toes in the craft wine pool, mostly out of their undying enthusiasm for the grape.

To show this, they might bottle a limited wine made from their estate grapes or buy fruit from the better vineyards, possibly exceptional single-vineyard sites. And these things cost money.

Let’s face it — if you’re sourcing more expensive fruit, grown on increasingly expensive land, with rising labor costs, the wine is going to cost more. So, sometimes, it is worth the money — and that means reaching deep into the crevasses of your wallet.

Here is a list of wines I recommend for all of the above reasons: love, love, and love.

Recommended Wines

Frank Family Vineyards 2002 Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley — Frank Family Vineyards has won my heart. I haven’t had a disappointing bottle yet. Their Cab is elegance embodied. Tootsie Roll flavors, laced with caramel, vanilla, and honeysuckle … backed up with white pepper, blackberry, and a slight smokiness. $55

Bodegas Roda 2001 Rioja Reserva — A family-run winery in Spain. The fun begins with a bubblegum aroma. Then it’s loaded with sweet black cherry, soothing vanilla, aromatic bittersweet chocolate, and soft, elegant tannins. $45

Boudreaux 2003 Cabernet Sauvignon Columbia Valley — Some of the best values in wine these days come from Washington State. But keep this one a secret. This Cab is a bit shy at first, but it opens up like a warm hug. Some supple tannins penetrate a base of bright, vibrant cherry and raspberry, tinged with plum and blackberries. $60

Bookwalter 2004 Merlot Columbia Valley — Family-owned winery in Washington State. Lush and rich with fully ripe blackberry, bitter coffee, and sweet chocolate. Definitely a big Merlot that will surprise you. $38

Pax 2004 Syrah Griffin’s Lair Sonoma Coast — This Syrah is gutsy, beefy, and in your face. Offers up blueberry, cherry, chocolate, and peppermint. Also try the Cuvée Christine. $50

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

Pegging Consumers

When I recently stumbled across a wine-consumer study called Project Genome, in my head I heard Project Runway‘s Tim Gunn cry, “Designers!”

The study came out last fall, but I didn’t read it then since the puzzling name sounded more like genetics than wine. Like Project Runway, with its stereotypically catty cast of characters ripping out each other’s souls, Project Genome typecasts the souls of wine buyers.

The study, sponsored by corporate wine behemoth Constellation Brands, reported the results of an online survey of 3,500 people, asking more than 100 questions about their recent wine-buying behavior and lifestyle choices. The findings placed people into six neat stereotypical segments.

Here are the Project Genome definitions: Enthusiasts (12 percent), who are obsessed and wallow in wine-ness; Image Seekers (20 percent), who buy both for sophistication as well as for trendiness; Savvy Shoppers (15 percent), who seek out great wines with great value; Traditionalists (16 percent), who want wine from an established winery; Satisfied Sippers (14 percent), who desire a sensible wine to serve to family and friends; and Overwhelmed (23 percent), those consumers who find shopping for wine frustrating.

Cutesy names aside, there is some validity to these segments, and they remind me that typecasting works sometimes. In this spirit, I defined each myself, hoping to cut through the bull.

• Enthusiasts: These exploring people try everything and rarely drink the same wine twice. They read anything “wine” and tend to think independently, so you can’t peg them. I hang with a bunch of Enthusiasts.

• Image Seekers: Personally, these people make me nauseous and are the main reason why wine is viewed as a stuck-up beverage. They drop $140 on Silver Oak Cabernet or Cristal just to look cool, no matter how many better wines are on the wine list. I’m depressed the percentage is so high.

• Savvy Shoppers: They want to expand but are nervous about it. These folks frequent wine tastings and buy the best values that night. They aren’t scared of more expensive wines as long as they’ve tried them. I love these people — they listen and make my ego swell.

• Traditionalists: These people don’t necessarily care about the price but also don’t want to be surprised. They buy the same Chardonnay each time they go to the wine shop or grocery store, like Mer Soleil (higher end) or Clos du Bois (lower end). Boring people, but hey, they support the industry and keep me working.

• Satisfied Sippers: They lack the explorer gene, probably have consumed the same crappy wine for years, like Schmitt Sohne’s Piersporter or Beringer White Zinfandel. They don’t care about where it comes from. They just want to catch a buzz.

• Overwhelmed: They struggle at the store and seek out creative designs on labels for their purchases. Animals hook them every time, and they fall prey to marketing efforts. Advice: Look for reliable Australian brands like Jacob’s Creek and Penfold’s. No animals, but they are consistent.

Why segment wine consumers? To make money, of course. The industry wants to market its wines more effectively, as well as graduate people through the levels to higher-priced brands. But there’s nothing wrong with being on any level — make it work (as Gunn would say) with your taste, wine drinkers.

Recommended Wines

Covey Run 2002 Cabernet Sauvignon Columbia Valley (Washington) — Smoky flavor like charred meat, laced with roasted cherries and ripe blackberries. A bit of oak tannin gives it some heft. $13

Banrock Station 2005 Semillon-Chardonnay SE Australia — Sexy aroma of sweet honey, mango, and pineapple. Zingy acidity with a smooth red-apple flavor. $6

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

Zin Is In

I’m an admitted Zin Bitch. I even have the T-shirt to prove it. This means I hoard my red Zinfandels, only bringing out the best ones when people “worthy” enough are around and on special occasions, like the season opener of Grey’s Anatomy. When I’m alone, I savor every drop, growling like a dog with its favorite chew toy if anyone comes near and licking the sides of glass if any drops deign to spill. Yes, it’s pathetic, but, hey, passion is passion. It’s the gutsy, berry-jammy thing that grabs me and holds on. I gladly surrender.

Zins still don’t get the respect they’re due. Austere Cabernets may be king, but since red Zins have the peppery personality and zingy zip, they deserve to at least be the prince. However, many people might think it should be the queen, since red Zin is often associated with its sweet cousin, white Zin. But I thank this blushing relative every day since, without it, I probably wouldn’t have Zin in my glass right now. In the ’70s and ’80s, grape growers were yanking out the Zin vines because they couldn’t sell the stuff. Then Sutter Home accidentally created a fruity blush wine from this hearty grape, and consumers went wild for it. Some 100-year-old vines were saved from death by their ability to be sweet on people. Versatile and delicious — just what I love in a grape.

The 1990s saw a resurgence in the love for dry, gutsy red Zinfandel, and pioneers such as the five “Rs” (Ravenswood, Renwood, Ridge, Rombauer, Rosenblum) began releasing these full-bodied beauties. At first, snooty Cabernet lovers shunned them, calling them brash and untamed (many hit a head-spinning 16 percent alcohol), but Zin, with its wafting fruit and irresistible charm, won many over. It’s now kinda hip to like Zin — like you’re “in the know” or something.

The regions that are churning out the best these days are the warmer areas, since Zinfandel takes a lot of heat to get ripe: Paso Robles, Dry Creek Valley, Lodi, and some from a cooler area, Russian River.

Zin’s versatility allows winemakers to get creative, crafting lighter styles as well as late-harvest dessert wines and ports. By definition, Zinfandels are heavier than Merlots but not as tannic as Cabernet Sauvignon. Many “bigger” (heavy tannins and high-acid) Zins are amenable to aging, capable of growing smoother and more complex with a few years of lying on their side. But most of them are fine for guzzling as soon as you hit the door.

And guzzle you should. Try a couple of these wines and tell me they aren’t beautiful.

Recommended Wines

Ottimino 2002 Rancho Bello Zinfandel Russian River — Elegance defined, with flowery scents of violets and roses, and ripe blackberry, blueberry, and earthy tobacco follow. $29

Clos La Chance 2003 Buff Bellied Zinfandel Central Coast — Named after a hummingbird found in Northern California, this wine is rich, hearty, and fruit-forward. It impresses with its luscious black cherry/blackberry combo. Subtle hints of herbs and white pepper too. Multi-layered wine that keeps giving the whole sip. $15

Artezin 2004 Zinfandel Mendocino/Amador/Sonoma Counties — Funky aroma when you first pour it, like stinky socks, but wait it out. Silky raspberry, wild cherry, and vanilla introduce a soft texture on the tongue. $15

Meeker 2003 FroZin Mendocino — A dessert Zin for those who love them. Liquid sugar, laced with orange peel, strawberry, and raspberry. Delicious. $27 for half-bottle, but it’s all you’ll need.

Hayman and Hill 2003 Reserve Selection Zinfandel Dry Creek — Bright and lighter than the others I tried. Bright cherry, eucalyptus, and fresh sage take the stage. The Zin to try if you like them more acidic and less sweet. $15

corkscrew@creativeloafing.com

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

Popular wines, up and down the dial

Churning out pithy wine descriptors for a regular column is no easy task. Some critics don’t even do them since fashioning creative imageries becomes overwhelming. But it’s got to be the same for other critics, especially music critics. How does one describe something that can only be heard? At least I have three senses to play with: sight, smell, and taste. So I thought, just for giggles, I could match up wine and music and see what happens:

Cabernet Sauvignon comes in many shapes and sizes, but it is often bold, tannic, and chewy. Its fruit arrives slowly, erupting in your mouth like a chocolate-covered cherry or … a surprise guitar solo. Van Halen comes to mind — the classic stuff, back when Eddie rocked, rough and steady. Like a Cabernet, VH’s music is relentless, strong, and hedonistic. Rapper Missy Elliott, with her commendable I-don’t-give-a-shit attitude, also gets in there.

Chardonnay, one of America’s favorite grapes, has been oaked up, buttered up, and twisted to fit into a chic consumer package for so long, I can’t remember its unadulterated flavor. Like music, the Chard trends change each year to please the fickle masses. Over the years, U2 has had the ability to morph its sound to change with the times. From acidic, corrosive guitar sounds to a smooth, elegant groove, the band’s music makes a statement the way a good California Chardonnay should.

Pinot Grigio/Gris, a somewhat bland grape that — in the right hands — has moments of glory, tastes clean, citrus-y, and a bit sharp. And it’s often better with food. Dinner-party, piano-based music, like Norah Jones or George Winston, works here.

Pinot Noir wallows in feminine sensuality. Sometimes coy, sometimes stylish, but always unpredictable. It changes dramatically as it ages, mellowing from a fruity personality into a more austere, darker flavor. Pinot is Sade, whose graceful, soulful music is timeless and embodies the elegance of a Pinot Noir. Erykah Badu with her smoky, funky neo-soul, comes in a close second.

Riesling, the oft-underrated grape of soft, sweet, peachy wines, is one of the “noble” varieties that people frequently drink surreptitiously, fearful of admitting their affection. People also won’t admit they love the cute, syrupy lyrics of country music, but if you investigate their car radios, you’ll inevitably uncover at least one button tuned to a Dixie Chicks-friendly station.

Sauvignon Blanc, acidic and tart, rubs people the right way or the wrong way. Some people just hate the bracing grapefruit, citrus scent, and flavor, but others, like myself, love this stuff. I throw the entire rap and hip-hop genre into this category — it generates the same ire or adoration.

Syrah/Shiraz is mysterious since you never know what you’re gonna get from the bottle — some Aussie Shiraz is light and fruity, and some California Syrahs taste spicy and full-bodied. The spicy ones reflect Johnny Cash, with his gruff, smoky vocals. Fruity Shiraz, delicate and sweeter, is more like John Mayer — uncomplicated and appealing to everybody, every day.

Zinfandel tastes gutsy, fruity, and sometimes garish with alcohol. It wants everyone to know it’s in the room, with its strong scent and peppery personality. Who does bold better than Cher? Or perhaps KISS, back in their youthful days, of course.

Recommended Wines

Fattoria Le Terrazze 2004 Rosso Conero (Italy) — $10. Bright, fun cherry with some tart acids that zing. Old-school Michael Jackson dance music. Delicious and cheap.

Bogle 2002 Phantom (California) — $22. Port-like in flavor, with hearty raisins and prunes, dark black cherries, and blackberries inching in. Big, beefy, and not for the faint of heart. Let breathe before drinking. A Nine Inch Nails kind of wine.

corkscrew@creativeloafing.com

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

Timing Is Everything

The year I was born, 1969, every region in the world made sucky wine. This meant the weather didn’t cooperate in over 20 wine regions across the globe. I thought it would be cool to own a bottle from my birth year — back in the Dark Ages — but, alas, I couldn’t fulfill my wish. In the year 2006, most people don’t even think about the vintage year listed on the label since most of the time it doesn’t matter. But there are times it does.

A vintage-dated wine is designated so when at least 95 percent of the grapes used were harvested in that year. A wine’s taste, complexity, and quality can change from one vintage to the next, mainly influenced by weather, especially in areas with varying climates and severe watering restrictions — like France. For instance, their 2003 vintage, when all of Europe succumbed to 100-plus-degree heat during the summer, produced completely uncharacteristic wines. They were higher in alcohol, with in-your-face ripe fruit — a far cry from their normal austerity. That’s why it behooves you to pay attention to the vintage in French wines.

France has watering restrictions for two reasons: It keeps production down and quality up. Lack of water stresses a vine so it produces less fruit with stronger, more concentrated flavor and, thus, higher quality. Higher quality means more cash for the vineyard owner and, as a result, more tax revenue for France. Spain and Italy have also practiced irrigation limitations over the years, although they’re not as draconian.

Does that mean you need to keep a vintage chart in your wallet for $10, everyday purchases? Not exactly.

In warm, sunny regions like California and Australia, where the weather is fairly consistent and there are few government restrictions on vineyard management, vintage dates don’t matter so much. Due to the lack of weather extremes during harvest, wineries can produce more consistent product year after year. Unless some kind of natural disaster occurred during a particular harvest — hail storms, fire, or floods — the wine in the bottle is probably pretty close to last year’s version. Of course, there are better years — like the 1997 vintage in California — but all in all, you’re safe.

But there are times when knowledge of the good vintages will come in handy. Let’s say you want to celebrate with a bottle of Bordeaux or Burgundy: Before you go popping a Franklin or more on this special bottle, it’s good to know if the wine will pay you back.

Thankfully, there are some “no-brainer” regions when it comes to choosing good vintages. In France’s Champagne region and Portugal’s Oporto region (where Port originates), a vintage is only declared in outstanding years. If the wines for a particular year don’t meet high standards, they use them in nonvintage blends instead. So vintage Champagne from France or a vintage Port from Portugal are safe investments.

Here are some recent French vintages that “people who know” have gushed over:

• Bordeaux: 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004

• Burgundy: 2000, 2002, 2003

• Rhône Valley: 2001, 2003, 2004

To find out more about vintage years, including which years these wines should be consumed for maximum pleasure, check out www.vintage-charts.com. But none of this stuff is an exact science. A talented winemaker can make good wine even in bad years, and vice versa.

To test all this out, see if you can find a “vertical” of the same wine — a series of vintages from the same maker. Compare them. Even if you can’t taste the difference, at least you’ll have an excuse to drink three bottles at once.

RECOMMENDED WINE

Chateau St. Jean 2005 Gewürztraminer Sonoma County — This is a grape that everyone loves but finds hard to pronounce (Guh-VERTS-tra-MEE-ner). This rendition is wildly floral, with fragrant peaches, ripe mango, and sweet honey. $15