Categories
CannaBeat Cover Feature News

Getting Real … Real High

Cannabis is real in Tennessee.

Real business people have real dollars at stake. Real consumers are facing real consequences (like jail time) running afoul of real laws. Real law enforcement officials do real work to simultaneously follow state and federal rules that often conflict. All of it, for now, runs easily into real gray territory as all of the players navigate a foggy system for a product once only the punch line of bad Willie Nelson jokes. 

Foggy? Take this statement, for example: Ice is legal in Tennessee; water is illegal. 

This confusing analogy was the simplest way the director of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation (TBI) could describe a serious cannabis law-and-evidence situation back in August. That situation may have the realest consequences.   

Some in Tennessee have been wrongly thrown into a tangled thorn bush of law and science, state’s rights versus federal law. Customers here bought a cannabis product made legal by the legislature in 2023. But the product became illegal (chemically speaking) while in the customer’s possession or after it was taken by police. But neither questions of science nor jurisdiction were likely on that cannabis customer’s mind as they sat in a dingy jail cell for following what they thought was Tennessee law.  

This real-world scenario has proven one of the hardest turns in Tennessee’s zigzag efforts to create and nurture a safe and legal cannabis marketplace here since 2018. With its hard-line refusal to make cannabis legal for recreational use (as 24 states have done with more likely to come) or to create a legal marketplace for medical use (as 38 states have done), Tennessee finds itself in that legal/scientific thorn bush, splitting hairs with customers’ freedom in the balance.  

But Tennessee is certainly not alone as it tangles with hemp-derived THC products or their marketplace. The U.S. Congress created these — and their many issues — when it made hemp legal on the federal level. Some have said the intent was the plant itself, not the many “intoxicating” substances scientists have been able to pull from the .3 percent of THC hidden inside legal hemp plants. 

To some lawmakers, these products and their marketplace were “unintentional” and they’re working to close the “loophole.” Other states, like Georgia, have moved to allow the products but ban big product categories, like smokeable flower and THCA. Of course, other states, like Colorado, have made all marijuana products legal but closely regulated and richly taxed. All of these things are happening while the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) is working through the process to remove cannabis from its list of the worst drugs. 

That move would likely change things dramatically in Tennessee, from consideration of a medical cannabis program to outright recreational use across the state. Until then, Tennessee lawmakers, consumers, businesses, and law enforcement officials operate in gray areas that could go quickly black and white, depending on who’s asking. 

That’s just what happened to George Worden in Middle Tennessee in 2019. 

Unapologetic about “unreliability” 

Worden, of Gallatin, bought nine grams of a hemp product (a plant material, likely flower) at a local cannabis store. Stopped by police, they tested his purchase. One test was negative, the other inconclusive. The local district attorney general sent Worden’s stuff off to the TBI. 

Worden refused to admit wrongdoing or take a plea deal. He took the charge to court. There, the TBI’s report said his hemp contained more than 1 percent of delta-9 THC, and a TBI chemist testified in court that it was “marijuana.” In 2020, Worden was convicted, fined $1,500, and sentenced to 60 days in jail. He paid up and served his time. Still, the blemish on his criminal record remained. 

In February of this year, Worden’s attorney got a shocking phone call from the Sumner County District Attorney General’s office. The TBI admitted its testing method may have raised the levels of THC in Worden’s legally purchased hemp. The DA there wanted to reverse Worden’s conviction.  

“Considering this new information about the potential for unreliability in the TBI’s THC testing process at the time of the investigation, combined with the doubts raised in the trial proof regarding inconclusive field test results, the evidence in this case does not support the defendant’s conviction beyond a reasonable doubt,” wrote Sumner County Criminal Court Judge Dee David Gay in the order vacating Worden’s conviction. 

Later in 2024, the TBI told the Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference about changes in their cannabis testing methods. The changes could overturn some convictions, like Worden’s, and suggested the DAs review some recent cannabis cases. With that, Worden’s conviction may have been the first case overturned with the new information. But it likely won’t be the last. 

Yet you won’t hear TBI Director David Rausch admitting problems with his agency’s testing. Nor will you hear him give an apology to anyone — like Worden — who may have spent time behind bars because of TBI tests. 

“I have no apologies because I don’t have anything that I need to apologize for,” Rausch told reporters in August as word about THC testing issues began to surface. “We owe no apologies based on what we do because there is no flaw in the effort that we have put forward.” 

In fact, Rausch said, “I take offense” to some of the “inflammatory statements made” about his agency and its testing. He said, “Our testing is solid.” However, in that same news conference Mike Lyttle, the assistant director for the TBI’s Forensic Services Division, admitted, “We don’t have instruments in place right now to tell the difference between THCA and THC.” While the TBI is now spending around $600,000 for equipment to do the tests, they send about 1,000 THCA samples off to the Tennessee Department of Agriculture (TDA) for testing in those cases.

Rausch said his team only provides results and data. Anything beyond that — possession charges in Worden’s case — are completely up to DAs. Further, when the Tennessee General Assembly changed hemp laws last year, his office interpreted them in-house. With that, they changed from reporting the amounts of delta-9 and began reporting it all as total THC. Then in the news conference, Rausch sort of threw up his hands at the minutiae.

“Remember, federally, this plant is still illegal, right?” Rausch said. “It doesn’t matter if you call it hemp. You call it whatever you want to call it. Federally, it’s still an illegal product.”

It was clear Rausch wants that simple, hard line on cannabis back in Tennessee. He said the bureau’s position is that all cannabis should be illegal once more here, and said confidently that there’s a “legislative fix” for it. However, he said he does not lobby the legislature but would work with them to “clarify” the situation, noting that “making it illegal again would also be clarifying.”

“Not totally wiped out” 

But making it illegal again would also wipe out a hemp-derived cannabis market in Tennessee roughly valued at more than $208 million over the last 12 months. In that time, the 6-percent tax on hemp-derived retail products has yielded $12.5 million in Tennessee tax revenues, according to Kelley Mathis Hess, CEO of the Tennessee Grower’s Coalition (TGC). 

New rules from the TDA wouldn’t go that far. But they would ban THCA products, mostly smokeable, raw, hemp flower products. If those rules are implemented, “that segment of the industry is over,” Hess said, noting that the segment can count as much as 70 to 80 percent of an individual retailer’s sales.   

“If the state does implement these rules, the people that lose are small businesses, consumers, and the state itself with the generated tax revenues,” she said. “Because it’s federally legal, I can still go online and order it from Florida, Texas, Oregon, New York — wherever it’s legal — and ship it here. A lot of people will probably just go back to the black market, get back on opioids, or something else.” 

State lawmakers passed regulations on cannabis last year and put the TDA in charge of managing the program. This meant that agriculture officials — not lawmakers — have made decisions about the future of the cannabis market here, including the one that could possibly ban smokeable THCA products. 

For now, TGC has filed its major grievances with the state on the new rules, hoping for some flexibility, some relief. If the state won’t budge and bans smokeable THCA, the group has two months to file a lawsuit. 

However, Hess said she hopes it doesn’t come to that. The industry has been flexible, following three different sets of rules in a matter of eight months. But right now, the industry is “in limbo.”

“It’s new and we expect it to get bigger,” Hess said. “We just want the opportunity to mature, and continue, and not be totally wiped out.”  

Dmitry Tishchenko | Dreamstime.com

The Georgia experience

Georgia’s cannabis industry was dealt a massive blow from state lawmakers this year and, yes, it could be a sign of what’s to come in Tennessee. 

The two states look similar when it comes to cannabis laws and approaches to the industry. Full recreational cannabis use is illegal in Georgia, like it is here. A limited number of patients can use medical cannabis oils there as here. However, state lawmakers in Georgia have allowed for certain cities — like Atlanta, Savannah, and Athens — to decriminalize cannabis possession for personal use. Meanwhile, Tennessee lawmakers overrode a Memphis City Council move to do the same here back in 2016.   

Both states began to wrangle with a burgeoning cannabis industry that arose after the signing of the 2018 Farm Bill, which legalized hemp that contained small amounts of psychoactive substances. Industries in both states grew to see the familiar, green cannabis leaf appear in myriad shop windows. Industry groups arose in both, too, to lobby lawmakers and protect the business interests of cannabis growers and retailers. 

Tennessee and Georgia also both decided to put cannabis regulation under the control of their departments of agriculture. The move has left some seemingly minute details in the hands of bureaucrats instead of lawmakers. In Tennessee, this is done even though those details can, maybe, make or break the bottom lines of businesses in a state that loves to say how business-friendly it is. 

At the beginning of the year, Georgia lawmakers sought to regulate the state’s cannabis industry. The House, Senate, and governor approved the Georgia Hemp Farming Act, a set of regulations for age restrictions, labeling guidelines, testing protocols, licensing, and more everyday matters for so many industries. 

But the Georgia law outright banned smokeable products and THCA. The legal reasons for that go back to the idea of THC amounts rising when these products are heated. The real reason, though, is likely because it gets you high and Jesus doesn’t like that very much (nor does the liquor lobby, conspiracy theories say). But that’s not how lawmakers said it. 

“Here in Georgia, the safety of our residents is top priority, especially that of our children and young people,” said Governor Brian Kemp in a statement. “Consumable hemp products are dangerous to minors and unregulated hemp products are a danger to all Georgians.”   

So the state enacted some commonsense regulations and then completely removed two whole product categories — not just products — from store shelves. Imagine the state government telling a bookstore they couldn’t carry nonfiction or magazines anymore. Why? Well, we just don’t like them and we’re protecting our community. That ban began on October 1st.

State officials said they’d give retailers a 90-day grace period to sell their remaining stock of now-illegal products. In the beginning, officials said they’d focus on educating the public. But a September statement from Georgia Agriculture Commissioner Tyler Harper gave a different vibe.

“The laws regarding under 21 sales and the sale of raw flower products are very straightforward and will be strictly enforced by our Law Enforcement and Hemp Program Divisions as well as other state and local law enforcement starting October 1st,” Harper said in a statement. 

The Georgia Medical Cannabis Society said the new law was passed with “legislative sleight of hand” away from public comment and transparency. It’s also just bad for business. 

“At its core, [the new law] presents a labyrinth of compliance hurdles that threaten to ensnare the unassuming farmer, processor, retailer, and consumer alike,” reads a LinkedIn post from Yolanda Bennett, operations manager for the society. “From fields of uncertainty for our farmers, ensnared by increased compliance costs and regulatory burdens, to processors caught in the crossfire of heightened testing and licensing expenses, the bill casts a long shadow of operational and financial strain.

“Retailers and dispensaries, once bustling hubs of community and healing, now face a constricted market, hemmed in by zoning restrictions and naming conventions that stifle their identity and outreach. At the end of this domino effect stand the consumers, bearing the brunt of increased product costs and reduced accessibility, their hands tied by the invisible chains of regulatory excess.”

The news had some Georgians scrambling. A number of Reddit posts in recent weeks have some saying they stocked up on their favorite flower or pre-rolls. Others said they planned to buy THCA products from online retailers in other states and have them drop-shipped through a Georgia retailer — a move that is totally legal, they said. 

Some were going to just quit cannabis but would miss it. Some suggested other hemp-derived cannabinoids like delta-8 or delta-9. Others suggested getting a medical cannabis card, which could grant them access to buy low THC oil. These products contain less than 5 percent THC. Some were just going to call up their trusty illegal weed mane. 

Again, this scenario could be a look into Tennessee’s crystal ball. Legalizing any intoxicating cannabis substance has been a bitter pill for state GOP lawmakers, no matter if cannabis supports agriculture and commerce, Tennessee’s official state motto. 

But should it, like Georgia, ban these perception-altering products, it will hardly be alone. New laws in Virginia had some retailers saying they could wipe out 90 percent of the products on their shelves. In August, Missouri Gov. Mike Parson signed an executive order outlawing all intoxicating hemp products. But the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services had to walk that one back, saying it would once again allow the sale of “psychoactive cannabis products” and instead it would focus on “misbranded” cannabis products. 

Fed moves 

Tennessee’s hard line on cannabis could end if the feds reclassify it, which would decriminalize it. That move is underway. While many here celebrate the light at the end of what’s has been a very long tunnel, GOP lawmakers are trying to dim those hopes. 

The DEA announced this year would begin the process to remove cannabis from its list of the worst drugs. The public comment period in this move ended this summer. In those comments is a letter of opposition from several members of Congress, including U.S. Rep. David Kustoff  (TN-8) and Tennessee Sen. Bill Hagerty. Among other things, the letter says the DEA was “not properly consulted” on the move, which suggests they were pushed into the change (allegedly by the Biden administration, though it’s never mentioned directly).

The letter says not enough is yet known about marijuana to loosen its laws. The lawmakers point to several studies claiming to prove that the drug raises rates of schizophrenia in young men, psychosis, anxiety, cognitive failures, adverse respiratory events, cancer, cardiovascular outcomes, and gastrointestinal disorders.

Sexual dysfunction was twice as high in men who used marijuana, they said of another study. They said marijuana use is responsible for more car crashes, violent behavior, alcohol use among veterans suffering PTSD, and a spike in emergency room visits, especially by young Black men. 

“It is clear that this proposed rule was not properly researched, circumvented the DEA, and is merely responding to the popularity of marijuana and not the actual science,” reads the letter. 

Yet another GOP-led move would ban all hemp-derived products — all of them — from the current Farm Bill, not waiting on any move from the DEA. This move would close the “loophole” that was “unintentionally” created in the 2018 Farm Bill that allowed hemp to be legalized, said U.S. Rep. John Rose (TN-6).

“Hemp is a product that requires and demands the correct guidelines, and if we do not provide these guidelines, we are threatening the safety of Americans,” Rose said during a House Committee on Agriculture meeting in May. “This amendment draws the much-needed line between the naturally occurring plant and adjacent particles, and the enhancing synthetic additives combined with the plant and placed on store shelves.”  

Not all Republicans want to ban the products, however. During that same meeting, U.S. Rep. Jim Baird (IN-4) said he’d vote no on the measure because “farmers around the country have invested their time and treasure over the last six years to develop a domestic supply chain of hemp and hemp products.”

The Senate version of the Farm Bill has not yet been released, though Democrats and Republicans alike have floated ideas to regulate the “intoxicating” hemp market, estimated to be worth around $30 billion in the U.S. last year. 


So, what’s a Tennessee cannabis consumer to do?

“Be smart consumers,” said TBI director David Rausch. But also, “If you want marijuana, go buy it.” As far as legal hemp products purchased legally, Rausch advised consumers to:

1. Keep your receipt from the store. That will go a long way to convince a cop during a pullover stop that the cannabis flower you bought is supposed to be legal. 

2. As you drive or transport it home, keep your product in its original packaging, unopened. If you’re carrying legal stuff in a baggie in which police are used to seeing illegal stuff, you could run into a legal challenge.

3. As you’re driving, keep everything in your front seat, in plain view of an officer. This way it doesn’t look like you’re hiding anything.    

4. Remember there is a chance of buying a product marked legal by a store, that may turn out to be illegal. You might not know until the police, the TBI, or the TDA test it.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature Uncategorized

TN Democrats Launch State Transportation Reform Push

State Democrats called for statewide transportation reforms Tuesday to address Tennessee’s ”growing traffic crisis,” and the state’s “crumbling transportation infrastructure,” laying blame at the feet of the Republican supermajority. 

In a Nashville news conference, lawmakers launched the “Rocky Top, Not Rocky Roads” campaign, highlighting road conditions and traffic congestion. They pointed to an annual state infrastructure audit that said the state now faces a $34 billion backlog in transportation projects. 

Billboards carrying the “Rocky Top, Not Rocky Roads” message will be placed in areas of the state where Democrats said commuters feel frustrated — Rutherford (Murfreesboro), Davidson (Nashville), and Montgomery County (Clarksville).  

”Potholes and congestions aren’t just inconvenience, they’re symbols of neglect plaguing our state’s infrastructure under Republican control,” said Rep. Ronnie Glynn (D-Clarksville). “I want to co-sponsor this transportation legislation because instead of relying on the pie-in-the-sky [ideas], like toll lanes, we need intelligent, sustainable solutions.”

Last year, the Republican-controlled House and Senate passed Republican Governor Bill Lee’s Transportation Modernization Act. Central to the new law are “choice lanes.” These will be lanes added to existing interstates (like I-40 and I-24) by private companies. Drivers can only use the lanes if they pay extra. 

Rep. John Ray Clemmons (D-Nashville) mocked the idea as “the only solution that the Republican supermajority and Governor Bill Lee could come up with.” Meanwhile, he said, congested drives cost urban commuters $989 per year and rural drivers $670. The issue, for Clemmons, was one of rising costs for working Tennessee families. 

“Since Republicans took over in 2011, they have doubled our state budget,” Clemmons said. “Have your roads gotten any better?  No. Have you seen less traffic on interstates? Have you seen safer bridges and less potholes? No. So, where’s the money going?” 

Here, Clemmons criticized the GOP’s $1.6 billion tax refund to what he called a “secret list of corporations, 53 percent of which were out-of-state corporations.” 

”Without leadership and courage, we’re not going to be able to lower the cost of living that directly impacts every family that we represent,” Clemmons said. “Again, the question working Tennesseans should be asking themselves is, ‘Where’s all my money?’”  

Tennessee roads are dangerous. The state ranked 9th for the highest rate of traffic deaths last year, according to data from the National Highway Safety Administration. Traffic deaths rose almost 9 percent in the state from 2022-2023, from 607 deaths to 661.   

Substantively, Rep. Aftyn Behn (D-Nashville) announced intentions Tuesday to file legislation in next year’s session of the Tennessee General Assembly to reform the state’s financing process for road projects. She and other Democrats called Tennessee’s current financing method for big transit projects — such as road construction — “outdated.” 

“One such way to fix our roads is to end the pay-as-you-go funding mechanism,” she said. “It will allow us — once we end it — to leverage our AAA bond rating and take out debt in order to lock in the cost, which means more bang for our buck.” 

For clarity, Aftyn was asked why the debt method is better than the current, GOP, pay-as-you-go method.

“… because you are paying the most amount of money for the least amount of product,” she said. “You are locking in inflationary percentages every time you buy product and you take out money. Whereas, if we take out debt, we lock in that amount and we’re able to pay it off over time, we will pay less in the long run.”

Issuing debt rather than relying on in-hand revenues increases the state’s ability to invest in large-scale infrastructure programs, the lawmakers say.  

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Expert on TN States’ Rights Panel: “FEMA Is Unconstitutional”

Subverting the federal government was on the minds of state lawmakers Thursday in an hours-long civics lesson from far-right speakers. 

As promised in the 2023 session of the Tennessee General Assembly, the idea of nullification was heard during a summer study session in Nashville. The idea is, basically, for Tennessee to be able to nullify rules from the federal government that it does not like. 

(Read our cover story — “Who’s Got the Power?” — from March to get more details on Tennessee, state sovereignty, and nullification.)

Bills to outline a nullification process in Tennessee go back to at least to 1995. A similar resolution passed in 2021 but it was specific to Covid. It condemned the federal government for mandating vaccinations, restrictions, or requirements. 

Another came last year when state Rep. Bud Hulsey (R-Kingsport) and state Sen. Janice Bowling (R-Tullahoma) filed the ”Restoring State Sovereignty Through Nullification Act.” 

In it, the legislature could decide what federal rules they wanted to follow or not. Also, if a voter scraped together 2,000 signatures, they could submit a petition for a nullification to the Speaker of the Tennessee House.  

The bill gained very little traction, if any at all. Neither bill even got enough support to place it on the calendar for a full committee hearing. The idea was slated for a summer study review in 2023. However, that study was interrupted with a special session on school safety, in the wake of the Covenant School shooting that left six dead.  

But Bulsey and Bowling’s idea did finally get that summer study review, even if it was actually in the fall of 2024. True to form on these sessions, Thursday’s hearing yielded no votes or promise of any course of action. It was purely for review. 

The session was not a town hall. State Sen. Richard Briggs (R-Knoxville), the committee chairman, said he knew the idea was “controversial” but did not allow members of the public to speak, or clap, or boo. That right to speak came only for the experts called upon by the legislature. Those selected for this duty Thursday were roundly (and soundly) conservative. 

Jeff Cobble is an attorney and member of the conservative Federalist Society. Joe Wolverton is the inaugural constitutional law scholar for the ultra-conservative John Birch Society. Mark Pulliam is an attorney and writer who, in an August blog post, prayed “… a single juror would vote for President Trump’s acquittal in the circus-like show trial …” in Manhattan. 

The hours of their testimony ranged back to the Declaration of Independence, through the 1781 Articles of Confederation, and to 1787 when the U.S. Constitution was proposed. Lots of it dove deep into definitions of the words of the constitution, like “all,” for example. 

“I’m going to take you like elementary school students through this so this is plain,” said Wolverton in a detailed section of the Constitution to elected lawmakers. “We’re going to go through it phrase by phrase.”  

As for the meat of the separation of powers (and therefore what power Tennessee really does have in nullification), Wolverton presented his ideas wrapped like a click-bait-y YouTube video. “In an hour,” he began, “I can show you how the 14th Amendment is taught wrong.”  

“State — capitalized — has a specific meaning,” he said. “It’s got to do with the sovereign. Nations today are nation states. They are sovereign. 

“I’m suggesting to you something radical, something I did not learn in [constitutional] law. The states are sovereign over the federal government. Now, take that and chew on it. That’s what this bill’s about.” 

Some spice in the meeting came late as state Sen. Jeff Yarbro (D-Nashville) began asking questions of the panel. He asked if the work of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) helping out now in East Tennessee was an example of what they were taking about.

Yes, Cobble said, “It’s usurpation, whether it’s used for good or bad,” adding that communities come together in times of tragedy, noting specifically that “the Amish, they build their own barns. They raise their owns houses.”

“You know, good things can happen without a government,” he said. “So, my answer is yes, FEMA is clearly unconstitutional.”

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Project Would Replace Racist Statue at Capitol with David Crockett

The statue of a historic West Tennessean is planned to rise at the Tennessee State Capitol where the statue of another historic but controversial West Tennessean recently fell. 

State lawmakers agreed to erect a statue of David Crockett on the capitol grounds in 2021. Public efforts to do this go back as early as 2012. The idea caught on but was tabled by the legislature in the 2020 session.   

Since the approval of the legislation in 2021, the process has moved along slowly and quietly. The State Building Commission approved the project during its meeting earlier this month. Even that vote was wrapped in a procedure that needed no debate, only the approval of the commission’s staff, which it had. That vote, however, only allowed for the commission of an artist to design, fabricate, and install the monument.

Legislation in 2012 created the David Crockett Commission. That board’s job was to find the ways and means necessary to create a statue of Crockett on the capitol grounds. Commission members were not to be paid nor reimbursed for travel. 

The group was also supposed to find private backers. The law reads, “No state funds shall [be] expended for such project.” That changed with the 2021 bill. Taxpayers will now foot the $1 million bill for the Crockett statue.

Another notable difference between the commission law and the new law is the location of the statue. Back in 2012, lawmakers just wanted it on the grounds of the capitol. But that changed in 2018, lawmakers had a more specific site for the statue: the pedestal above the Motlow Tunnel on Charlotte Avenue on the south steps of the Capitol Building. 

There was only one problem. When that legislation was introduced, another statue already sat at the location — the statue of racist, segregationist newspaper editor and politician Edward Carmack. The 2018 bill detailed the fact the Crockett statue was to be “in lieu of the Senator Edward Carmack statue” — that is, removing it and replacing it.

In his 1800s attire, curly, windswept hair and broad mustache, many who wandered by Carmack’s statue wondered aloud, “Why is there a statue of Mark Twain at the Tennessee capitol?” 

But Carmack could not have been more different from Twain. For example, Carmack, as editor of the Memphis Commercial newspaper at the time, incited a mob against anti-lynching activist, journalist, editor, and business woman Ida B. Wells. The mob destroyed her newspaper office. She was away and stayed away, all according to the Tennessee State Museum. 

Carmack was shot and killed by political rivals in Nashville, near where his statue was erected in 1927. It was installed, however, by a prohibition group (Carmack was also a staunch prohibitionist) that thought his big-profile death could further their cause. 

With this, the GOP-led legislature must have faced a quandary in 2020 and 2021. How could they remove a huge historical marker from the capitol as they were fighting to keep so many others (like a bust of Nathan Bedford Forrest)? 

History, it seems, took care of that. Protestors tore down Carmack’s statue in 2020 during the turmoil following the police killing of George Floyd. 

Photo: Natalie Allison

State officials said at the time the statue had been removed to another location. State law said it had to be replaced. But it’s unclear if it ever was. 

But the suggestion that the statue had to be replaced by state law drew the (10-tweet) ire of pop star Taylor Swift. 

Photo: Taylor Swift via X

“FYI, [Carmack] was a white supremacist newspaper editor who published pro-lynching editorials and incited the arson of the office of Ida B. Wells (who actually deserves a hero’s statue for her pioneering work in journalism and civil rights),” Swift tweeted at the time. “Replacing his statue is a waste of state funds and a waste of an opportunity to do the right thing.”

One of the 2021 bill’s sponsor, Sen. Steve Southerland (R-Morristown), even told The Chattanooga Times Free Press at the time, he “didn’t think it would be possible to remove Carmack.”

The newspaper story said, Southerland “then smiled and then added: ‘Someone removed it for us, so they did us a favor.’”

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

TN AG Supports Warning Labels on Social Media, But Do Labels Work?

The Tennessee Attorney General has joined a bipartisan group last week to urge the U.S. Surgeon General to slap a warning label on social media platforms to protect young people’s mental health. 

Surgeon General Dr. Vivek H. Murthy called for such labels in June with an op-ed piece in The New York Times. In it, Murthy said, ”the mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor.” Risks of depression and anxiety are nearly doubled for adolescents who spend more than three hours per week on social media, Murthy said. 

Murthy rang the alarm bell on social media use last year in a detailed advisory on youth and social media. Parts of it went broad, what you’d expect in a scientific paper from the government. For example, it reads “scientific evidence suggests that harmful content exposure as well as excessive and problematic social media use are primary areas for concern.” But the report also gets into the nitty-gritty of real harms.   

”Despite social media providing a sense of community for some, a systematic review of more than two dozen studies found that some social media platforms show live depictions of self-harm acts like partial asphyxiation, leading to seizures, and cutting, leading to significant bleeding,” reads the advisory. “Further, these studies found that discussing or showing this content can normalize such behaviors, including through the formation of suicide pacts and posting of self-harm models for others to follow.”

Twenty other studies reviewed by the Surgeon General found social media could “perpetuate body dissatisfaction, disordered eating behaviors, social comparison, and low self-esteem, especially among adolescent girls.” 

Last week, Tennessee AG Jonathan Skrmetti added his voice to this effort. He joined a letter with some unlikely allies — liberal havens like California, Massachusetts, and more. It also had red-state support from typical allies like Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, and others.

“Algorithmic social media platforms have had a devastating effect on kids’ mental health,” Skrmetti said in a statement. “The evidence of the damage done by these platforms continues to mount. My office is in litigation against several social media corporations and remains committed to ensuring that this entire industry does right by our kids.”

But do government warning labels work? That is, if these platforms come with a new box on the screen telling kids they are harmful, will they change their behaviors? A couple of historical examples say no, or not really, or it’s hard to say.  

The most-famous warning labels came after a similar Surgeon General’s advisory on cigarettes in 1964. By 1965 cigarette packs carried those warnings that say “smoking may be hazardous to your health.” 

Do they work? One recent study says no. 

“Placing graphic warning labels on U.S. cigarette packs did not have an effect on smoking behavior; however, these findings suggest that they may enhance other tobacco control strategies to reduce cigarette smoking,” reads the summary of a 2021 report in the journal Substance Abuse and Addiction. 

For the study, 357 smokers were given different packs — some with the warning label, the others were blank. After three months, there was no difference in smoking behaviors.  

Another famous government warning label may have induced children to consume even more of the product that label deemed harmful. Any 90s kid is familiar with the black-and-white label on some CDs that read “Parental Advisory Explicit Lyrics.” 

The idea for those stickers came not from a doctor nor a child behavioral professional but from a group of four women married to lawmakers. The “Washington Wives” famously included Tipper Gore, married to Al Gore from Tennessee. Together, they convinced Congress the stickers would shield kids from the sexually explicit lines in Prince’s “Darling Nikki” or AC/DC’s “Let me Put My Love Into You.”

Did those stickers work? Hard to say. Just as there was little data to prove the music was actually harmful, little data seems to exist of the sticker’s effect on protecting children. Frank Zappa told a congressional panel that the legislation for the stickers was “an ill-conceived piece of nonsense that fails to deliver any real benefits to children…” 

As for any word from any government agency, a curious (and probably old) memo from the Washington State Attorney General says ”most experts and critics alike, feel the label is too vague and that it doesn’t offer any information at all.” 

”Critics also say that ratings can cause a ’boomerang’ or ’forbidden-fruit effect’ and may actually attract children,” reads the memo.  

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Dems Urge AG to Join USDA Task Force on Food Price Gouging

The rate of food price increases is expected to slow in the remainder of the 2024 through 2025 after several turbulent years that have left some wondering if consumers have been gouged. 

The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) latest Consumer Price Index report predicts all food costs will rise by 2.3 percent this year. Those costs are expected to rise by 2 percent next year. However, food-at-home prices (think grocery store prices) are expected to only rise by 1.2 percent while food-away-from home prices (think restaurants) are expect to rise 4.1 percent.   

Food prices surged in the onset of the Covid pandemic, raising all food prices by a bit more than 3 percent in 2020. This increased to nearly 4 percent in 2021. 

But food prices leapt up by nearly 10 percent in 2022, the highest increase in food prices since 1979, according to the USDA. Some of this can be explained by a bird flu outbreak that affected egg and poultry prices, and the war in Ukraine, which the feds say compounded other economy-wide inflationary pressures like high energy costs. This trend slowed last year, with food prices rising by nearly 6 percent.

So, prices have gone up. But is it price gouging? That’s what the USDA wants to know and is empowering states to help root out it out. 

In July 2023, the USDA and a bipartisan group of attorneys general in 31 states and the District of Columbia formed a task force to find price gouging and other anti-consumer business behavior and end it. 

To get there, the Agricultural Competition Partnership (ACP) combined experts, state and local officials, and market research. Also, the USDA will funnel money and other resources to state attorneys general so they can keep a close eye on activities in their states.

“By placing necessary resources where they are needed most and helping states identify and address anticompetitive and anti-consumer behavior, in partnership with federal authorities, through these cooperative agreements we can ensure a more robust and competitive agricultural sector,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said at the time. 

So far, Tennessee has not joined this group. However, two Nashville Democrats — Sen. Charlane Oliver and Rep. Aftyn Behn — urged Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti to do so last month. 

“High prices at the grocery store have weighed heavily on Tennessee families, and they deserve to know that their state government is taking every possible step to ensure fairness in the marketplace,” Oliver said in a statement. “Joining this task force would demonstrate our commitment to protecting consumers and promoting economic fairness for all Tennesseans.”

Oliver and Behn worked this past legislative session to eliminate Tennessee’s sales tax on groceries. The effort was thwarted and the two said, “Republicans in the state legislature opted to pass a $5.5 billion tax handout for large corporations instead.” 

However, they think joining the USDA task force on price gouging is one way that could help control costs of everyday goods for Tennesseans.  

“Corporate consolidation and anti-competitive practices in food and agricultural markets have had a detrimental impact on the U.S. economy, leading to unfair competition and increased prices for families,” reads their letter to Skrmetti last month. “By joining the Agricultural Competition Partnership, your office would play a crucial role in addressing these issues and working towards solutions that can bring down the cost of groceries for Tennessee families.

“Additionally, this partnership can help find ways to boost wages for family farmers and small agricultural businesses, which are vital components of our state’s economy.” 

Skrmetti’s office has not commented publicly about the request. But during National Ag Day in March, his office tweet-thanked the state’s “farmers for feeding our state and the nation!” They also tweeted photos of Skrmetii in a chore vest, work gloves, and rolled-up sleeves holding a baby goat and a bale of hay. 

Categories
News News Blog News Feature Uncategorized

Study: Tennessee Ranks Near the Top for Cannabis Arrests

The Last Prisoner Project

Tennessee is near the top for arresting people for cannabis and near the bottom for cannabis justice. 

Those are the conclusions from Denver-based The Last Prisoner Project (LPP). The group is “dedicated to releasing every last cannabis prisoner and helping them rebuild their lives.” It works on drug policy and criminal justice reform to “redress the harms of the federal government’s so-called ‘War on Drugs.’”

The group said 14,426 people were arrested for cannabis in Tennessee in 2022, using the latest available data. The figure gives the state an arrest rate of .2 percent per the population. Cannabis arrests comprised 39 percent of all drug arrests in the state that year. 

The Last Prisoner Project

This puts Tennessee near the top in two of these rankings. Only Texas arrested more people for cannabis that year (24,941). (But given that state’s huge population, the arrests rate was only .08 percent of its population.) Only Wisconsin had a higher arrest rate for cannabis (.22 percent). In Louisiana, 60 percent — more than half — of all drug arrests were for cannabis.   

But LPP admits that any real figure to determine exactly how many people are locked up on cannabis charges will be “an educated guess” at best. 

The Last Prisoner Project

“Unfortunately, thanks to our complex and oftentimes impenetrable hodgepodge of local, state, and federal criminal justice databases nobody — not even the federal government — is privy to that exact number,” reads a blog post from the group. 

However, the group’s figures (and Tennessee’s cannabis arrest rates) aren’t plucked form the air. LPP relied on two separate Bureau of Justice Statistics reports reviewing incarcerated populations by drug-specific offenses. That is, the report counted all those behind bars for drugs and what drugs brought them there. 

But the figure has to be low. Those reports don’t count those in local and county jails, juvenile detention facilities, and those held for pre-trial and pre-sentencing. Also, some facilities just don’t report to the feds like they should. 

“Nearly 40 percent of law enforcement agencies around the country did not submit any data in 2021 to a newly revised FBI crime statistics collection program,” according to a study from The Marshall Project. Neither New York City nor Los Angeles reported to the FBI that year, for example. 

The Last Prisoner Project

But the LPP can measure how well states help those previously incarcerated to find justice in the wake of either cannabis legalization or service of their time. 

Don’t worry. Tennessee does terrible there, too. Its June report gave Tennessee a D- after earning 3 points. (California earned 25 points for scale.) 

The Last Prisoner Project

“With no full legalization, no pardon policy, no avenues for resentencing, and extremely limited avenues for record clearance, Tennessee falls behind and offers virtually no relief for individuals impacted by past cannabis prohibition,” reads the report.     

The Last Prisoner Project

The LPP gave Tennessee two points for a law passed in 2022 that allowed for some criminal records to be expunged. However, it wasn’t written specifically for cannabis and the LPP said, “this unfortunately means that cannabis offense are not expedited nor guaranteed.” 

The state’s other point in the report came as the law does include broad eligibility for different levels of offenses. Tennessee scored points only in two of the report’s 16 categories. 

Don’t worry. Mississippi and Arkansas scored a D-, too. However, both states got an extra point over Tennessee for having some sort of legalization and/or decriminalization process. Tennessee has neither. 

Categories
News News Blog News Feature Uncategorized

CannaBeat: Cannabis Group Follows Through on Promise to Sue State

As promised, the Tennessee Growers Coalition (TGC), the state’s advocate for the cannabis industry, sued the state over new rules it says are “void” and threaten the industry. 

State lawmakers passed new laws last year to regulate the burgeoning cannabis industry in Tennessee. Among many other things, the new law made the Tennessee Department of Agriculture (TDA) responsible for regulating the cannabis industry in the state. Late last year, the department issued a draft of new rules for cannabis producers and products. 

The department updated those rules in July after a public comment period. However, TGC said state officials did not include ideas from the nearly 19,000 public comments in the new rules.

Instead of blending those ideas into a set of final rules, the TGC said agriculture officials issued emergency rules. The timing and procedure of issuing these new rules form the basis of the cannabis industry’s lawsuit filed Friday. The process, TGC said, “imposed an immediate and irreparable threat of harm” to the businesses of its members.

“TGC members’ businesses and livelihoods are at stake by being forced to adapt their business practices to regulations, change the type of products they sell, and how they manage compliance while paying a license fee under regulations that are void as a matter of law,” reads a statement from the group. “The (TDA) has nothing to lose while TGC Members risk losing everything.”

The new rules still include new THC standards for THCA and CBD flowers. New limits could see those products removed completely. The new rules would also allow police to arrest manufacturers, retailers, and consumers for selling or possessing these smokable products, according to Cultivate Tennessee, another hemp advocacy group.

The new state rules redefine THC to include a product’s total THC. This includes a lot of THCA — the cannabinoid that produces a “high” — smokeable products.

“They’re trying to redefine it by combining two different cannabinoids,” TGC executive director Kelley Mathis Hess told us last month, “two different things, when it should just be Delta 9, and Delta 9 only. They’re trying to put a limit on [THCA] but the limit would, basically, ban a lot of it.” 

Hess said these products are probably the most popular products on the market right now. Many small businesses have built their business around sales of these products, she said. Removing them could prove fatal to them. 

TGC promised to fight the rules in court last month. A court date for the lawsuit has been set for next Thursday, September 19th. 

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Re-MEMernet: Alfredo Sauce, Painted Raccoon, and #buttholegate

Let’s have a look back at some huge (and hilarious) MEMernet anniversaries. 

Posted to Facebook by WMC-TV

“Saucy Situation”

The MEMernet was obsessed this time two years ago with a truck accident that spilled enough Bertolli alfredo sauce to temporarily close I-55. 

Coverage quotes from FOX13’s Kate Bieri went viral, including one used in a tweet from The New York Times that read: “Unfortunately this is Memphis, and we had some pretty intense sun beating down on that alfredo sauce, and also humidity. It was just not a great recipe for a highway full of alfredo sauce.” 

#notmyjob

Posted to Facebook by Richie Esquivel

Richie Esquivel’s sad/hilarious Facebook post went around the world this time last year, picked up by WMC-TV, The Guardian, and The New York Post.

His photo showed a dead raccoon painted over by a road crew laying new traffic stripes along Getwell. It raises so many questions, but one thing was clear to Esquivel. It was “#notmyjob,” he wrote. “Memphis, Tennessee, baby. But Getwell Road looked real nice, tho.”

Neverending #buttholegate

Posted to Facebook by Imagine Butthole Cafe

The Imagine Butthole Cafe Facebook page always remembers.

The scandal was born seven years ago last month and internet scientists have yet to calculate the cumulative hours sunk into the hilarious, Memphis-only rabbit hole. Even researching this brief post, I was sucked into it. 

Here’s our brief reporting of it when it happened in 2017. 

But the wild story and the reaction to it went all over the world (and that’s not hyperbole). Here are some stories from Eater and Vice.  

Susan Ellis, our food writer and managing editor at the time, listed ButtholeGate as one of the top food scandals in Memphis. 

In the Best of Memphis issue of 2017, I picked ButholeGate as the year’s “Best Butthole Buzz.”

“The only butthole-related scandal that mattered this year was ButtholeGate, of course. This mighty beast of social-media hilarity and hurt feelings rose in July from a Google review (yes, a Google review) of Imagine Vegan Cafe in Cooper-Young. ButtholeGate paralyzed Memphis Facebook and Twitter for nearly two days, and the story finally spread as far as The Washington Post (yes, that Washington Post). Before it was all over, the humor harvest yielded “Butthole McYodelTown,” a puckered logo for “Hole Foods Memphis,” and #buttholesoutforchelsea. — TS”

ButtholegGate (SEE?! I can’t even stop writing about the thing now!) surged again on Reddit around its anniversary last month with some curious folks just wanting to know what the heck was going on. Delicious hilarity ensued. Check it out: 

Comment
byu/Fit-Possession9012 from discussion
inmemphis
Comment
byu/Fit-Possession9012 from discussion
inmemphis
Comment
byu/Fit-Possession9012 from discussion
inmemphis
Comment
byu/Fit-Possession9012 from discussion
inmemphis
Comment
byu/Fit-Possession9012 from discussion
inmemphis
Comment
byu/Fit-Possession9012 from discussion
inmemphis
Categories
News News Blog News Feature

New TVA Rate Hike Will Raise Bills Here in October

Environmental groups blasted a rate increase for electricity from the Tennessee Valley Authority, (TVA) Thursday. 

The TVA board approved a 5.25 percent rate hike during its meeting Thursday in Florence, Alabama. The move is expected to raise nearly $500 million for TVA. The agency said the average residential bill in its coverage area last year was about $138. The new increase will translate to about an additional $4.35 each month.

“We recognize that people don’t pay rates, they pay bills, and that matters,” said Jeff Lyash, president and chief executive officer of TVA. “We know this is a kitchen table issue for many families across our region. At TVA, we don’t like price increases any more than you do, and that’s why we continually work to reduce expenses by hundreds of millions of dollars each year.

“We have done everything possible to absorb costs as we invest in the reliability of our existing plants, construct new generation to keep up with growth and maximize solar to produce more carbon-free energy,” Lyash added. 

The increase came almost exactly one year after the TVA board approved a 4.5 percent rate increase. That increase was expected to add $3.50 to customers’ monthly bills and was needed to improve efficiency and add 30 percent of new power load to the grid, TVA said at the time. 

However, the total 9.75 percent rate increase figure was by design, environmental groups said Thursday. If the agency raised rates by 10 percent in a five-year span, that would have triggered re-negotiations with local power suppliers, like Memphis Light, Gas & Water (MLGW). 

Knoxville-based Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE) officials said they were frustrated by the lack of public information and input on the rate increase. 

”Only in an Orwellian world of misinformation do we see our nation’s largest ’public’ power utility pass a massive rate increase while providing the public the least amount of information compared to ‘private’ utilities,” said SACE executive director Stephen Smith. “It’s highly unusual for a utility the size of TVA to issue a rate increase with zero independent review. This is a broken process, and every ratepayer in the Tennessee Valley is literally paying the price.” 

SACE said it could “only guess” at what is driving “TVA’s current financial woes.” And it had a guess: “the largest buildout of fossil gas in the country in a decade,” pointing to new projects for fossil gas pipelines and power plants. 

This also drew the ire of Gaby Sarri-Tobar, energy justice campaigner at the Arizona-based Center for Biological Diversity.

 “It’s outrageous that TVA is raising rates again to pay for more dirty fossil-fuel plants and pipelines,” Sarri-Tobar said in a statement. “The country’s largest public utility is planning to build more methane gas capacity this decade than any other utility, defying its duty to be a clean-energy role model.

“By approving this rate hike, the TVA board is responsible for making life-saving power more unaffordable for millions of people, as our climate spins out of control.”

A 4 percent electric rate increase from MLGW began in January. It was the first of three annual increases to “fund continuing infrastructure improvements which will enhance the reliability and resiliency of the local electric grid.” Customers can expect their bills to — at least — increase each year for 2025 and 2026. It was not immediately clear how TVA’s new rate hike would impact MLGW’s scheduled increases.