Categories
Cover Feature News

White on White

Mahaffey White speaks like a painter, sprinkling names such as
Pollock, Cezanne, Monet, and a few you’ve never heard of into the conversation
and talking about learning how to look.

“To see is itself a creative act,” she says with the
practiced authority of a school teacher. There are maybe a dozen black-and-
white photographs of landscapes spread across a table in front of her and she
pauses before continuing.

“I thought for a while that I wrote that quote. It was
rather embarrassing to find out I did not.”

A month shy of her 90th birthday, the diminutive woman laughs. It
is the sort of afternoon she loves: The sunlight sneaks into the Cooper-Young
Gallery’s back room in glittering streams. If she were not here she would
probably be out traipsing through the woods with her camera, hiking over hills
and sometimes crawling under things to get the shot she wants.

“In taking a picture, I’m thinking of composition. I try
very hard to think of it in terms of a finished piece.”

With her embroidered cardigan sweater and snowy white hair, White
could be mistaken for just another grandmother. But the spry and energetic
nonagenarian is probably one of Memphis’ best-kept secrets.

Unlike some of her contemporaries, White has never really sought
out gallery representation.

“She’s one of those people that most folks don’t know
about,” says David Hinkse, co-owner of the Cooper-Young Gallery.
“She really is a Memphis treasure.”

Once a jewelry designer and an associate art professor at Shelby
State, White has shown her work, mostly metal, throughout the region and in
New York for over 30 years. Then, about 10 years ago, she decided to take an
introductory photography class taught by a friend. Photography has been her
primary medium ever since.

Over the years, her work has been shown as part of the Memphis
College of Art’s 1996 alumni show, in solo shows at Christian Brothers
University, and as part of Mayor Rout’s permanent collection. This week an
exhibit of her work opens at the Cooper-Young Gallery for a special 90th
birthday show.

Just don’t ask her to take your picture.

“When I tell people I’m a photographer, I apologize almost
immediately,” White says. “I’m not a real photographer. I couldn’t
do your portrait.”

The Long and Winding Path

One Christmas when White was young, an aunt and uncle gave her
and her sister a dollar.

The day was warm, with just a light dusting of snow on the
ground.

“We immediately walked to the corner of Peabody and Cooper.
There’s something new there now, a photography studio, but it was a drugstore
for many years,” she recalls. With the money, White and her sister bought
a Brownie camera.

“You didn’t call it a box camera then. We called it a Kodak.
We wanted a Kodak,” she says.

“I was very interested in taking snapshots.” Even
though many of the pictures in her photo albums from that era were taken with
the Brownie, photography wasn’t a medium she pursued.

Born in Corinth, Mississippi, in 1911, White moved to Memphis a
couple years later with her family. She attended art classes at one of the few
city schools that had them at the time and struck up a friendship with her art
teacher, a local painter.

Spending extra hours in art class on the weekdays and in classes
on the weekends, she always knew she wanted to be involved in art.

“I designed and made my own clothes before I was out of
grammar school,” she says. “I intended to become a dress
designer.”

After graduating high school, she was accepted at the Art
Institute of Chicago and spent 1929 taking first-year courses. Then the Great
Depression hit.

“I had little knowledge of the stock market before that. The
South had always been somewhat depressed,” she explains.

Like many students at the time, she didn’t want to be a financial
drain on her family. She left school, came back home to Memphis, and got a job
selling Victrola records. It didn’t last long — not only was the Depression
still going strong, but radio was coming in and the Victrola records were
going out.

At the time, her younger sister was working as a dental assistant
and she got White a job at the office. She worked as a dental assistant for
four years before she decided it was time for a change.

“I liked my work. I liked my life, but I decided that this
is not what I’m about. I decided to go to New York.”

It started as a vacation plan with a friend. But when the friend
backed out and the trip fell apart, the independent young woman decided that
she would move to the city instead.

PHOTOS COURTESY OF
MAHAFFEY WHITE
Mahaffey
White: designing a dress in her New York apartment in the
Thirties.

“I always dreamed of going to big cities. When I was growing
up, I thought, Oh, Memphis is just a country town.” She didn’t expect to
come back.

White arrived in New York on her 24th birthday and presented a
letter of introduction to Mary Barry, a former Memphian and a friend of a
friend.

“Mary had made an arrangement with a friend to get rid of me
if she found me too boring. Luckily that didn’t happen.” Instead, the two
women spent the afternoon seeing the city from atop a double-decker bus and
finding White a place to live. In the process, they became fast friends.

Once settled at a residence run by the Salvation Army, White
supported herself with temporary jobs with the WPA program and as a shop girl
for the Arnold Constable department store. She didn’t have a regular schedule
at Constable; the management would wait until after the store opened, and if
there were enough customers, they would call White in to work a table of
merchandise on the main floor. From that vantage point, she could see the
lions outside the New York Public Library.

“I held on by my fingernails,” she says of the time.
“I went to New York with $100 borrowed from my mother. Designing clothes
was still my real ambition.”

Then, in 1936, she got a seasonal job at Henri Bendel, a Parisian
clothing atelier. Customers would pick out the dresses they wanted from models
and then White and her cohorts, sitting at long tables, would custom-make the
dress to the customer’s measurements.

“I was like Berthe, the sewing-machine girl,” White
says.

She also met her husband, an organist, that same year through a
mutual friend still living in Memphis.

“He kept insisting that I call Richard White. He also
insisted to Richard that he call me. … If I had known that, I would never
have been the first to call.”

The pair found they had much in common. And, 63 years of marriage
later, they still do. “Those were wonderful years,” says White.
“Meeting him had a lot to do with me enjoying New York.” The couple
went to concerts and museums; there wasn’t a lot of money so most of the
things they did were free.

White worked at Henri Bendel for three seasons, returning to
Memphis during the summers to save money.

“There was nothing creative about [the work], but it was a
great experience to learn dress-making the way it would be done in a Paris
salon.”

White then got a job with the Butterick Company.

“Between the two jobs, this was the better one in a lot of
ways. It wasn’t quite as manual,” says White. She would be given a sketch
and then would do a rough draping: developing the designer’s ideas by laying
muslin on a figure and making a pattern.

“I was an assistant designer in a sense, but they didn’t
call it that back then.”

“Strangely, all the jobs I’ve had in my life have been jobs
I’ve never had any particular specific experience for. They were all new
avenues; I guess I rather liked it that way.”

It was around this time that White found herself thinking more
about art.

“I really began to appreciate modern art in a true
sense,” she says, “when I met Harriet Fitzgerald.”

Fitzgerald founded the Abingdon Square Painters and taught a
small group of people in her studio. White took classes and still exhibits her
work with the group every year.

Meanwhile, White resigned from Butterick when World War II began;
her husband was drafted and they had a young son and she began working from
home. She taught dressmaking classes and tried to realize her lifelong dream
of owning a dress design business.

“From the art standpoint, my business was successful,”
says White. “It was highly unsuccessful from a financial point of
view.”

Around 1950, White and her husband moved back to Memphis with
their children. (They turned their apartment over to the Abingdon Square
Painters for studio space; the group still uses the location for its shows.)
Back in Memphis, White, instead of pursuing art or clothing design, became
very involved in civic issues, especially education.

With John Spence, White helped found the Memphis Better Schools
Committee. The group, which included Francis Coe and Dr. Hollis Price, worked
for higher teacher salaries, smaller classes, and a fairer distribution of
county tax dollars. White ended up with her picture in Life
magazine.

“Oh, yes,” she says. “It was quite accidental. In
those days, you didn’t go to a school board meeting and think you might have
the chance to say something. You had to be on your feet before the gavel came
down and just start talking.”

“This day a number of people from Better Schools were there
and I was chosen to read our statement. Some photographer was taking pictures,
but I didn’t know he was working for Life.” The magazine was doing
a photographic spread about people across the country working for changes in
education.

“Someone in my household kindly penciled in a mustache and a
goatee. I never asked who did it; raising children is hard enough without
knowing who drew a mustache on your face.”

Unfortunately, White says she also ended up spending most of her
time driving back and forth from Nashville for committee meetings. There was
little time for art or anything else.

“For the second time in my life, I said, ‘This is not what
I’m about.’ I had forgotten who I was as an artist.”

In her mid-50s, she went back to school full-time, majoring in
metals at the Memphis Art Academy (now the Memphis College of Art).

“The clothes I was making before, they weren’t just to adorn
people. I was interested in the people,” she says, sounding wistful.
Taking what she had learned from Henri Bendel, the clothes were beautifully
made, but the only people who could afford them weren’t the people she was
making them for. To her, jewelry solved that problem. She could create a work,
and the people she had in mind when she created it could afford to buy it.

After two full years of classes and almost 40 years after she had
first gone to college, White had her bachelor’s degree.

“It wasn’t enough. I wanted to work again.” She
thought, perhaps for practical reasons, perhaps because of her work with
education, of teaching.

She got her master’s from Memphis State (now the University of
Memphis) and began teaching at the then-fledgling Shelby State. There, she
taught jewelry making, drawing, anything; if the students wanted to learn it,
White says the department would accommodate them.

“My seven years at Shelby State were the most meaningful of
my career. It was the highlight of my life,” she says.

She retired from the school in 1981. About 10 years later, she
was back … as a freshman.

White and Black-and-White

Photography

Patti Lechman met White while both of them were teaching at
Shelby State. The two, along with another professor, would eat lunch together
every day and have been friends ever since.

“After she retired, Mahaffey started doing pottery. I was
teaching a ceramics class and she enrolled,” says Lechman. But because
the medium was waning in popularity, Lechman began teaching a beginner’s
photography class instead. White enrolled in that, too.

“Mahaffey always wants to be doing art,” Lechman says.
“Photography has really become her medium.”

David Hinske agrees. “She has an artist’s eye. Any one of us
could be walking by a streambed and not see the art in it.”

White’s birthday show is composed of photographic prints from a
recent trip to Scotland; most of her prints are a study in the contrasts
between light and dark.

“There’s a feeling of openness in her work,” says
Lechman, “tunnels or passages, light streaming through doorways. When you
see her body of work, there is a consistent vision. It’s very
powerful.”

In one of Lechman’s favorite series, White used double exposures
to show places she used to live in Memphis. Superimposed on those images are
what is on those sites now, whether it’s empty lots, other houses, or
convenience stores.

Many of the Scotland photos, however, are of ruins.

“I like ruins,” White explains. “I may be near to
being one myself.”

In the darkroom, though, White is a relentless perfectionist,
often working on the same print for an entire class at a time, trying to get
everything just so. She knows exactly what she wants and will work with the
print until she gets it.

“She’s made me a better photographer,” says Carolyn
Hinske, co-owner of the Cooper-Young Gallery. “In knowing her,
particularly in the last year, I’ve become more critical of my own
work.”

Lechman says her beginning art students get two teachers for the
price of one with White taking her class.

“Having the students see how she approaches what she does,
the kinds of standards she sets for herself,” says Lechman, “she’s a
real inspiration.”

“I always say, ‘I want to be like Mahaffey when I grow
up,'” says Lechman. “She’s a priceless, priceless
treasure.”

Carolyn Hinske says she expected White to act the way Georgia
O’Keefe is rumored to have: crotchety, self-important, and mean. But that’s
just not the case.

“She is one of the most lovely ladies,” says Carolyn
Hinske. “Part of it is that she exudes such a positive energy. She gets
so tickled and so excited over things. She doesn’t really focus on the past.
She’ll talk about it if you ask, but she doesn’t dwell on it. She’s always
talking about what she’s going to do next.”

White says she’s interested in going back to other media;
photography has fueled her imagination. But there’s only so much time in a
day.

“I was brought up close by,” she says, gesturing toward
Young Avenue. “This area is well known to me. It makes me feel like I’ve
gone full circle, but I hope not.

“I have things ahead I still want to do.”

Categories
Cover Feature News

Endpapers – Part III

Chance in the House of Fate: A Natural History of Heredity

By Jennifer Ackerman

Houghton Mifflin; 249 pp.; $25

In Chance in the House of Fate, Jennifer Ackerman’s exploration of molecular biology is nearly as intricate as her subject. She probes the mysterious world of cells, sperm, and bacteria with textbook precision and with a whole-hearted admiration for the human connection to the natural world. It is this genuine admiration that makes Ackerman’s book a joy to read, an insightful and self-reflective study that is both scientific and lyrical.

The book is divided into 18 sections, each a close examination of the microscopic world that links all forms of life, from microbes to mice, cephalopods to human beings. Ackerman, a contributing writer and editor for National Geographic magazine and The New York Times, engages in a detailed explanation of genetics that, despite its specificity, is accessible and enjoyable. She approaches the subject of heredity from a personal desire to understand her sister’s genetic disorder and from her awe of the beauty of childbirth, of the symmetry and perfection of her own infant’s face. This curiosity about her own genetic makeup is manifested in a “pilgrimage to the heart of heredity.”

Each living entity, each individual cell, becomes a world of wonder for Ackerman, whose unique philosophy relishes nature and reminds us that “any dividing of life, however useful, is also artificial, reflecting the particular needs of the human mind rather than the realities of nature.” From Ackerman’s intriguing perspective the genome of a fruit fly is connected to Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, and the response of our immune system to Salmonella is a complicated play, like Shakespeare’s Othello. Her fascination with all living organisms, with heredity, and with motherhood is a reminder of both the mystery and the realities of our existence. — Virginia Benitez

A Pitcher’s Story: Innings with David Cone

By Roger Angell

Warner Books; 290 pp.; $24.95

A longtime editor with The New Yorker, Roger Angell has built a reputation as somewhat of a baseball scholar, with six books on the national pastime to his credit. His latest, A Pitcher’s Story, is a collaboration with veteran big-league hurler David Cone, best known recently for his work with the latest New York Yankees dynasty. Before he pitched in five World Series and before he won the Cy Young Award as his league’s best pitcher, Cone toiled on the mound as a Memphis Chick. He went 8-12 for the 1984 club and — Rick Ankiel fans, take note — led the Southern League with 27 wild pitches. Almost two decades later, Cone is approaching 200 major-league wins, now as a member of the Boston Red Sox.

Angell spent the entire 2000 season with Cone, a campaign that proved to be a bittersweet coda for the pitcher in Yankee pinstripes. Cone suffered through the worst year of his career, accumulating an ugly record of 4-14 (and separating his shoulder to boot) for a club that would win its third straight World Series. What was begun as a project to examine the craft of pitching at the hand of one who did it best became an attempt to convey what Angell describes as baseball’s principle of connection: writer to subject, fan to player, past to present. Less an examination of the art of pitching, Angell’s book became a study of the psyche of a professional athlete who finds his skills eroding … in front of millions.

Reading about Yankee success is like reading about Kennedy fame. It’s the bumps in the road that catch our attention. So it is with David Cone’s story. Angell mentions the highs — the 1999 perfect game at Yankee Stadium, Cone’s gutsy win over Atlanta in the ’96 Series — but he grips his reader with the lows. Cone suffered a career-, even life-threatening aneurysm in his arm during the 1996 season. He was a member of the raucous New York Mets of the late ’80s and early ’90s and became fodder for the Big Apple tabloids when his nightlife somehow managed to outshine his stellar pitching. All along, though, Cone remained as cerebral a ballplayer as one can expect. His enormous role as a representative for the players union during the 1994-95 strike makes for the most provocative reading in the book. These are the chisel marks that have come to shape Cone the ballplayer and Cone the man. “His defeats and his stubborn energy and courage had become the story,” writes Angell.

As with nearly every baseball writer, Angell’s chief weakness is a tone that too often screams, “FAN.” While he aims to provide insight into the atmosphere of baseball life, he does so from the perspective of someone who sees it from behind a notebook and maybe envies it a little. He goes so far as to write, “The more I saw Cone in confusion and pain, the better I liked him.” While a little skewed, the comment says a lot about a book that describes an aspect of major-league baseball we examine far too little: its humanity. — Frank Murtaugh

The Circus Fire: A True Story of an American Tragedy

By Stewart O’Nan

Doubleday; 384 pp.; $14 (paper)

To this day, survivors recall that the worst part of it was the shrieking of the animals trapped in the terrible fire.

But no animals died that day — what everyone heard was the agonized screams of more than 200 men, women, and children who perished when the Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus tent caught fire in Hartford, Connecticut, on July 6, 1944.

No one ever discovered what caused the blaze, whether it was intentionally set by a disgruntled circus employee or whether it started from a cigarette, carelessly tossed into the straw below the stands. But in a matter of minutes, the canvas “big top” became a raging inferno, trapping more than 7,000 people inside during an afternoon performance.

I’ve read many history books over the years, and perhaps I have a morbid streak, since quite a few of them have involved disasters, but The Circus Fire, fully illustrated with photos taken during the blaze, is one of the best stories I’ve encountered in a long time. Stewart O’Nan makes us feel we are there in Hartford on that awful day and takes us minute-by-minute through the events of July 6th. We meet many of the families who decided to spend the day at the circus, we experience the horror of the fire almost first-hand, and we learn how those who survived coped with the memory of that day for the rest of their lives.

Among other things, we learn that the tent blazed so fiercely because it had been waterproofed with a mixture of paraffin and gasoline — good at repelling water, but strike a match to it and it becomes, in effect, a giant torch. We learn that most of the exits were blocked by tent poles, guy wires, and bleachers — forming an obstacle course as the tent filled with smoke.

We also learn the pathetic story of the dead girl who came to be known nationwide as “Little Miss 1565.” That was the number they tagged on her at the makeshift morgue after the fire, and that became the inscription on her tombstone. Though she wasn’t disfigured by the flames (many bodies were totally consumed by the intense heat), no one ever came forward to claim her, even when newspapers and Life magazine ran her photo. Today, she remains one of the mysteries of the tragedy that came to be called simply the Circus Fire and just one of the compelling stories of that day in Hartford that O’Nan tells so well. — Michael Finger

In Cuba I Was a German Shepherd

By Ana Menéndez

Grove Press; 229 pp.; $23

In the realm of literary fiction, first story collections by younger authors have a tendency to come out pretty uneven — such revered works as Barry Hannah’s Airships and Kurt Vonnegut’s Welcome To the Monkey House are examples — in that some of the stories are so faultless as to make you shake your head in envy, while others miss their mark by a wide margin. This is only natural, a common criticism. Rarely do you find an artist, even a master, who pulls off what appears to be perfection regularly.

This is what strikes me as so impressive in Ana Menéndez’s debut collection, In Cuba I Was a German Shepherd. It’s pretty damn even. Granted, some tales shine, other sparkle, and some are merely polished, but the book is a fine, coherent rumination on the hearts and minds of Cuban exiles growing old in Miami.

The stories are surreptitiously linked; you’ll follow a new protagonist around for five pages before you realize he or she appeared two stories back as a secondary character. This is telling. Menéndez’s Miami is populated by the fainter doppelgangers of those native Cubans who fled Castro’s revolution 40 years before. Some seem but ghosts of their former selves. And as we follow them or they skirt the perimeters of these stories, their pain almost imperceptible, an appropriate impression of otherworldliness descends upon the reader — every bit of dialogue becomes weighted with memory and remorse, characters breathe and dream. And you are convinced that, of course, they are in another world, unable to shake off the ache of being torn from their families’ homes (whose corridors they still walk).

This quasi-novelistic approach is a wonderful way to flesh out a community so colored by the past. The connections between these characters are tenuous, yet their comfortable familiarity recalls their common ailment: They are Adams and Eves who fled a crumbling Eden. Paradise is lost, and they can never return, but every day they hope to wake to the dissolution of Castro’s Cuba, the rebirth of theirs.

Menéndez has given us a sensitive, humorous, and sad look at ourselves, and rarely does she miss her mark. — Jeremy Spencer

Simone Weil

By Francine du Plessix Gray

Viking; 246 pp.; $19.95

Leslie Fiedler once called Simone Weil, in this, the age of alienation, “our kind of saint.” Flannery O’Connor, who pretty much knew sainthood when she saw it — foolishness, too — countered by once calling the life of Simone Weil “comical.” (No telling what O’Connor would have made of Fiedler’s insinuating “our.”)

Francine du Plessix Gray in her fine new book, Simone Weil, the latest in Viking’s very fine Penguin Lives series, stays out of the sainthood business and mounts the simpler, well-put argument that Weil the intellectual powerhouse, Weil the Marxist-turned-anti-Soviet socialist, Weil the non-Catholic Catholic mystic, and Weil the undereating champion of the economic underdog was in actuality a classic case of anorexia nervosa complicated by crippling bouts with massive migraine.

The diagnosis isn’t du Plessix Gray’s and it isn’t new, but it does help make sense of a life often shorn of sense. The same diagnosis had occurred to Weil’s friend Dr. Louis Bercher as early as 1950, seven years after a coroner’s report described Weil’s death in England, age 34, as “Cardiac failure due to … starvation and pulmonary tuberculosis.” But it did not appear in Bercher’s memoir till after the death of Weil’s devoted (and doctor) father, who categorically denied any such ailment in his daughter and had all references to it struck from the literature surrounding her.

So what is it with Simone Weil? Is she saint or clown? Intellectual or mystic? Martyr or neurotic? The correct answer is seven: all six.

Simone Adolphine Weil was born in Paris in 1909 and grew up in a household it seems only the French can come up with. Her father — “kind, loving, and thoroughly enlightened, but taciturn and easily overwhelmed by his forceful spouse” — practiced medicine. Her mother — “as scrupulous about her children’s physical well-being as she was about their education” — practiced a dreaded fear of germs to go with her absolute faith in learning. Neither practiced the former family faith, Judaism. A son, André, was born in 1906, and in addition to being a mathematical prodigy, taught himself classical Greek and Sanskrit by the age of 12, when he was not on his way to becoming an accomplished violinist. Du Plessix Gray calls this household “a hermetic, rarified world,” but when you read that the youngsters André and Simone “often communicated with each other in spontaneously rhymed couplets, or in ancient Greek,” or that “[w]hen reciting scenes from Corneille or Racine they corrected each other with a slap in the face when one of them made a mistake or missed a beat,” you might want to call it closer to science-fictional. Whatever. This is the world Simone Weil was born into, a world she never felt herself entirely smart enough to be member of (what came naturally to André came, through sheer hard work, to Simone) and a world she never entirely outgrew. Not even after she developed a take-no-prisoners style of argument at the Ecole Normale Supérieure. Not even after various teaching appointments in the secondary schools of ’30s France took her from Paris but not from her attending parents.

As du Plessix Gray describes it, the career Weil followed and the leftist politics Weil professed were only broadly typical of her time and intelligence. Dressed head-to-toe in the most belligerently unbecoming get-ups possible, Weil smoked too much, ate little, then less than little (according, always, to the insufficient diet of those with whom she wished to identify), and so positively felt for the working class that, unlike her political soulmates, she felt it necessary to submit to physically punishing and mind-killing factory work so as not to think herself above and outside it. This, despite an in-built inability to perform safely the most routine manual tasks, and this, despite developing and highly idiosyncratic ideas on the nature of beauty, power, affliction, and the Cross.

The civil war in Spain got Weil wounded when she clumsily stepped into a line of friendly fire (a pot of boiling cooking oil), and the Second World War saw her proposing ideas to the Free French when the Free French had little time for either her or her brand of unrealism. Same with the priests from whom Weil sought counsel on doctrinal issues so as to permit her, conscience clean, to be baptized in the Catholic faith. True, Weil found comfort here. Also true, Weil found Logic, true faith of the French, opposed to the one, true Church, Rome.

The whole, final scenes described in this book make for sad reading, because we in hindsight know that this impossible figure, Simone Weil, was acting in and outside her time as witness or fool. But what of this hold Weil continues to have on the imagination, especially the imagination of those who grant her uncommon intelligence but who cannot grant her humility and charity as anything more than an eating disorder or super-headache? O’Connor may be right, but since when is “comical” necessarily not to be confused with saintliness? — Leonard Gill

Categories
Cover Feature News

Endpapers – Part II

Unacknowledged Legislation

By Christopher Hitchens

Verso; 320 pp.; $25

Over the years, Christopher Hitchens has earned a reputation as a sharp-edged polemicist who cannot resist savaging the powerful — Reagan and half his administration; Bill Clinton, whom Hitchens attacks with almost as much gusto as he did Reagan; even Mother Teresa, for goodness’ sake. He has charged Henry Kissinger with war crimes and Sydney Blumenthal with perjury.

Like his intellectual comrades-in-arms Noam Chomsky, Lewis Lapham, and Gore Vidal, Hitchens enjoys exposing what he would call the hypocrisy of political discourse. He is always appalled by the imperfections of public men and women and plays the role of gadfly, as Bill Buckley did of yore, though from a different perspective, to be sure.

Unacknowledged Legislation, a collection of Hitchens’ essays on writers, reveals a more nuanced man than the angry radical offered up periodically on news talk shows. Hitchens trains his critical eye on, among others, Oscar Wilde, George Orwell, Salman Rushdie, Vidal, Saul Bellow, Anthony Powell, and Tom Wolfe. He defends T.S. Eliot against cheap charges of anti-Semitism and almost comes to terms with the idea that Whittaker Chambers was telling the truth. He rips Norman Podhoretz and disputes Raymond Williams, a Marxist historian who unfairly maligned Orwell and who was less than fully forthcoming about the failures of Stalinism.

Hitchens is a rare breed: a leftist who has been refreshingly candid about the failures of socialism as practiced in the Soviet sphere. We sense that he was led to this once rarely trod ground by Eastern Europeans such as Milan Kundera, Vaclav Havel, and Czeslaw Milosz, though none of these writers is discussed in much depth in this book.

Unfortunately, Hitchens does not provide a unifying theme to these disparate essays. One anticipates, given the title, a deeper exploration of the relationship between literature and power. If that relationship is explored, it is only by implication. For example, students of Orwell might recall that he once penned an essay called “Inside the Whale,” in which he argued that writers living amid the tumult of the 1930s and ’40s (communism unleashed, fascism on the rampage, a world at war) should withdraw from the chaos so as to avoid being co-opted by the particular “ism” of the day. In 1984, Rushdie responded to Orwell in “Outside the Whale” by arguing that in the nuclear age writers don’t have the luxury of retreating from the public square. As if to prove the point, a few years later, the Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwah condemning Rushdie to death for his alleged blasphemy in Satanic Verses. Given his knowledge of both writers, Hitchens surely is aware of this exchange, but inexplicably he does not join the debate even though it centers on one of the fundamental issues facing writers as “unacknowledged legislators.” (Hitchens, though, does stand by Rushdie in the face of Khomeini’s edict.)

These essays do have value, however, if only because of Hitchens’ wit and style. He applauds Phillip Larkin’s poetry, despite Larkin’s alleged bigotry, and he writes movingly of Kipling, who, for all his chest-beating over World War I, was so devastated by the loss of his son in that war that he began to chisel away at his once-carved-in-stone assumptions. (A more detailed account of Kipling’s impact on British-American foreign policy can be found in an earlier Hitchens book, Blood, Class and Nostalgia — precisely the kind of exploration of writers I expected here.)

A theme or two does however emerge in these pages. Specifically, sexual intolerance is the one thing Hitchens cannot abide (other than poor writing, perhaps). Homosexuality is discussed repeatedly — how it drove Oscar Wilde to destruction, how Alan Bloom never publicly acknowledged his own, how Phillip Larkin refrained from attacking the intolerance surrounding it, how Gore Vidal flaunted it, how W.H. Auden and Christopher Isherwood lived it. The issue is raised so often that it begs the complaint of politically correct overkill (and Hitchens is rarely politically correct). Hitchens even argues that antihomosexual hysteria is “the moral concrete” that holds conservatism together. I would have thought lower taxes and the call for small government, but Hitchens is not above caricaturing the views of the opposition.

The familiar journalistic pyrotechnics are also on display. Princess Diana is “a gold-digging air-head.” Tom Clancy’s writing “is to prose what military music is to music.” Norman Podhoretz possesses “the soul of a cultural commissar.” Conor Cruise O’Brien “made the mistake of confusing the condition of the cosmos with the state of his own liver.” Hitchens opens himself up to parody, too. In praising a particular piece of writing by H.L. Mencken, he observes: “This is finely written. It shows something of the feeling for the religious pulse that Marx evinced in his critique of Hegel, and it does so without making any concessions to illusion.”

I, for one, will take his word on it.

Hitchens clearly loves literature, and he keeps his political saber at least partially sheathed in order to celebrate some of this century’s finest writers, even a few whose politics he finds offensive. (Though certainly his sharpest arrows are aimed at conservatives.) He even praises The Great Gatsby and Arthur Conan Doyle — hardly standard fare in the good radical’s library. The generosity shown many of the writers analyzed in this collection would surely be coveted by politicians and government officials who have too often felt Hitchens’ point. But they wait in vain until they put down the sword and pick up the pen. — George Shadroui

The Copenhagen Papers: An Intrigue

By Michael Frayn and David Burke

Metropolitan Books; 144 pp.; $20

Michael Frayn is the British playwright (Noises Off ) who penned the witty Booker Prize finalist Headlong in 1999, a madcap story of a lunatic art appraiser who thinks he has found a missing Brueghel in a neighbor’s fireplace. It was the sort of balancing act of comedy and erudition that one might expect from Peter DeVries or early J.P. Donleavy. Frayn also authored a play called Copenhagen, which ran in London and then New York, where it received three Tony Awards, including Best Play of 2000. One of the actors in that play was David Burke.

Now, together they have written The Copenhagen Papers: An Intrigue, based supposedly on some papers sent to them during production of the play, papers which shed new light on the history of the German nuclear physicist Werner Heisenberg and the scientist Niels Bohr, about whom Frayn wrote Copenhagen. The book is a head-spinning mix of fact and fiction.

This much is known: Michael Frayn did write a play about the true-life mysterious meeting of these two scientists in Copenhagen at a time when Heisenberg was working for the Nazis. What was discussed and how close the Nazis were to having a nuclear bomb remains a puzzle to this day. According to Frayn, England, after the war, brought the Nazis’ entire team of scientists to a clandestine location, a place called Farm Hall, and held them, secretly taping their conversations to determine how much they knew. The British government was also intent on preventing the Russians from kidnapping the scientists to do much the same thing. You with me so far?

During the production of Copenhagen came a packet of papers supposedly from a family now living in Farm Hall, papers that, when translated, turned out to be instructions for the construction of a Ping-Pong table.

All this Frayn explains in the introduction to The Copenhagen Papers. What follows is the correspondence between Frayn and Burke concerning this disturbing turn of events. Are they on the verge of rewriting history? Are they privy to secrets the government would be interested in?

The first question becomes, Is this all a put-on? Is Frayn inventing or recording? And does he indeed have new news about the covert collaboration of the two scientists? Anyone who read Headlong knows that this is just the sort of mystery mixed with history Frayn loves to play with. It is also the clay with which he models this witty novella, if a novella it is. “One of the themes of my play, after all,” Frayn writes, “was the baffling irreconcilability of so much of the story to the end.”

Without giving away too much, what ensues is a battle of wits between Frayn and Burke along the lines of Anthony Shaffer’s play Sleuth. It’s one-upmanship, and the reader is involved, and just how the reader is involved is half the fun.

But the question soon shifts. Are the Frayn and Burke of The Copenhagen Papers just characters created by Michael Frayn? The real Frayn (or is it the character?) says, “I realized that I was in almost exactly the same situation as the central character in the novel I had just finished writing, Headlong. There is great pleasure in inventing frustrations and humiliations for one’s characters; this pleasure turns rather sour, however, when one finds one is being subjected to those same frustrations and humiliations oneself. The biter bit has more to endure than the pain of the teeth marks.”

Frayn doesn’t just pull the rug out from under your feet; he takes your feet. The game played, if indeed it is a game — everything is in doubt, the reader is purposely kept off-balance — is swift-moving and presents one precipitous transition after another. “Once the ground has shaken beneath your feet,” the author warns, “you feel it go on shaking for a long time afterwards.”

The wild ride that is The Copenhagen Papers is that kind of gambol. Frayn has fashioned another compelling comedy, built of forgeries, fakes, false fronts, disguises, pranks, and mysteries — a quick sleight-of-hand which leaves you without your wallet.

In the end, is the whole book a ruse? Could be. Is there really an author named Michael Frayn? No doubt. — Corey Mesler

Was This Man a Genius?

Talks with Andy Kaufman

By Julie Hecht

Random House; 170 pp.; $23.95

The title is a hedge or, rather, a bet cast in full assurance that you already know the answer. Was Andy Kaufman a genius? Of course he was. Otherwise you wouldn’t be bothering with this thin volume by author Julie Hecht. Unfortunately, Hecht never answers the question because she never provides tangible proof that she can. She chooses instead to present the facts as she sees them and weighs in only on slightly less lofty concerns.

True, the late comedian’s brand of entertainment was never easy to figure out, whether during its apex in the late 1970s via skits on Saturday Night Live or now, as the posthumous accolades fall down on this odd, perplexing man whose humor still conjures bewilderment. Hollywood may have sent in the big guns via box-office sure-thing Jim Carrey, yet the poor faring of the 1999 biopic Man On the Moon says plenty about mainstream America’s continuing reluctance to embrace Kaufman’s performances in post-modern Dada, despite the celebrity achieved during his stint with the sitcom Taxi as immigrant mechanic Latka Gravas.

Was This Man a Genius? is the quintessential after-death book in that it simply wouldn’t exist had its subject not expired, which Kaufman did in 1984. It’s a chronicle of the year Hecht spent in search of an interview with Kaufman for a piece assigned by Harper’s magazine. She spent time with him when he came to New York for work or pleasure, and like a passenger duct-taped to a roller coaster, she rode the Wacky World of Andy Kaufman long enough to finally get the interview and write the story, only to have it rejected by Harper’s as being too long and “too strange to be published.”

For that, you can thank the subject himself. Love him or loathe him, Andy Kaufman was arguably the strangest, most unsettling presence to greet you from your television since … well, maybe since the big box settled into the living rooms of America. Whether going to the wrestling mat with women or performing myriad acts of madness on Saturday Night Live — the bongo skit, the Mighty Mouse skit, the unnervingly brilliant Tony Clifton lounge act, or the sincerely loving Elvis impersonation — Kaufman was a guerrilla comic on a warpath no one had even thought to blaze.

Hecht held on as best she could, tolerating his late-night culinary whims, subjecting herself to the often brutal chicanery of Kaufman and his agent cum co-conspirator Bob Zmuda, enduring her subject’s penchant for self-mythology and outright horseshit, doggedly pursuing what she knew was a good story. And finally, she got it, possibly the most confessional, if brief, interview Kaufman ever gave a reporter. It was all there: the domestic and adolescent complexities that prompted a young Andy to gaze vacantly from a window at an age when he should’ve been slobbering over Lincoln Logs; his decidedly skewed perception of romantic relationships; the roots of what seemed all the world like the most bizarre acts ever executed in the name of comedy; even the revelation that he really wasn’t even trying to be funny.

Everything of worth in Was This Man a Genius? arrives in one nice, tidy package at the end of an otherwise superfluous, mildly entertaining journey through the mind of a comedian who either was or wasn’t a genius. (“They could call me an absurdist and a surrealist,” Kaufman tells Hecht at some point early in their year together.) The problem with Hecht’s book is that she doesn’t take control, harness the story, put her own damn opinion into the thing. And if you care about Andy Kaufman, that makes for an infuriating read, because she got closer to him than just about anyone in her professional capacity.

So you’re left, ultimately, with a question unanswered, hanging like a half-broken branch. And somehow you can’t help but believe that Kaufman — if nothing else, a master of manipulation — would enjoy the hell out of Hecht’s disappointing, hardly revealing book. The baffling bastard. — John Floyd

The Money and the Power: The Making of Las Vegas and its Hold on America, 1947-2000

By Sally Denton and Roger Morris

Knopf; 479 pp.; $26.95

In The Money and the Power, the wife-and-husband team of Sally Denton and Roger Morris, veteran investigative reporters, use organized crime and Las Vegas as the prism through which to view a large chunk of America’s social and political history of the last half-century.

Real mobsters and politicians generally don’t sit down with authors for candid discussions of their mutual dependence and enrichment. To tell this story of the Kennedys, Lyndon Johnson, Ronald Reagan, and other politicians with mob connections, the authors relied on numerous books and published articles, testimony gathered by various crime commissions, as well as stacks of FBI files obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and interviews with confidential sources. This is a business, the text reminds us, where mobsters don’t just scare or snub snoops and snitches. They kill them. The book is complex, ambitious, not beach reading by any means, and heavy-going under any circumstances. I consider myself, professionally speaking, a casino junkie because of the Tunica story, but after reading this book, I felt overwhelmed as much as informed.

One problem: the subject itself. We’re used to fictional treatments of the Mafia that focus on a single mob figure or family such as, notably, the novel The Godfather and the movies made from it. If you had trouble keeping the Corleones and Tattalias and the rest of the families straight, you’ll have your hands full with The Money and the Power.

Another problem: the book’s prose. Denton and Morris don’t write many short sentences like this one. Instead, they pile name upon name, subordinate clause upon subordinate clause, insert parenthetical material within parenthetical material (not that the material isn’t sometimes helpful when introducing unfamiliar names, since some of them are not identified until the notes at the end of the book) until sentences become as turgid as this one. Where were the editors?

The book also falls short of its promise (and its title) in one key respect. There is little here about the present state of gambling and the publicly owned corporations that run it. Mississippi, which specifically modeled its casino licensing and taxes after Las Vegas, is almost totally ignored, including, curiously, the Gulf Coast and its connections to organized crime. There is a chapter on the late Benny Binion but nothing on his son Jack, who is arguably the main man or “the juice,” as the authors say, in Tunica. Nor is there much about the demand side of the casino equation, the millions of ordinary Americans who play the slots and low-dollar blackjack and enjoy it. Tying together gambling’s venal past and populist present would make a nice book. The Money and the Power is not it.

What you will learn, however, is a lot about Las Vegas and gambling’s sleaziest financiers, hit men, whores, and entrepreneurs, and more than you probably want to know about former Tennessee senator Estes Kefaufer and his crime hearings in the Fifties.

Having said all that, this is an important study, and the authors deserve high marks for guts, thorough reporting and research, and connecting an awful lot of dots. The notes alone fill 47 pages; the bibliography, 18 more. The Money and the Power is an antidote to simplified, fictionalized, historical treatments like the summer blockbuster Pearl Harbor. The truth, the authors note, is complicated. This book tries to tell it. — John Branston

Categories
Cover Feature News

Endpapers

Yonder Stands Your Orphan

By Barry Hannah

Atlantic Monthly Press; 336 pp.; $24

There’s a rumor about Barry Hannah bringing a gun to a class he was teaching at Ole Miss and firing it in front of his students. There’s another about him sharpening a knife during a reading at a bookstore, only to thrust it into the podium midsentence. There’s also one about him arriving drunk to a booksigning and attempting to scandalize every woman there. And there’s a particularly nice story about him playing trumpet with Mississippi roots-rock band Blue Mountain.

Legends like these abound about Hannah. Probably most of these stories — and the multitude of others that float around — aren’t true, and probably a few of them are. That’s not really the issue, though; what’s more important than the veracity of such gossip is the simple fact that such legends are being told. What other living Southern author has such a widespread and mythic legend surrounding him?

As famous as he is for his intimidation, drunkenness, and unpredictable behavior, Hannah is also renowned for his talent — his sentences sear the reader — and for his maddening inconsistency. A common perception of his work is that he is a far better short story writer than novelist. He excels in creating highly focused stories that seem to explode with action and meaning, while his longer pieces can often prove looser and more digressive.

Perhaps his latest book, Yonder Stands Your Orphan, will change this perception: It is an aggressively strange novel of stories and ideas sewn together like a Frankenstein’s monster and told by a writer whose own legends suggest he knows of which he speaks. Episodic and often elegant, it is composed of stories “of men gone mad with religion and vicious with regret, mass conflagrations, graves.”

Hannah focuses on a large group of crazies and eccentrics who live and work around Eagle Lake near Vicksburg, Mississippi, a remote locale frequented by hardcore fishermen and lunatics alike. His characters are creatures of the casinos and the backwoods, old men lamenting a South that never existed, unladylike ladies both very young and very old. They are the same kinds of people who populate Hannah’s previous fictions, hardscrabble hoodlums and middle-age losers this close to snapping; he has even revived one of them name and all — Sidney Farte, the entertainingly sinister old coot who first appeared in “Water Liars,” from his classic first story collection, Airships.

At the center of all the commotion are a few who might be considered main characters: Melanie Wooten, a 73-year-old widow who has “an elegance on loan from the cinema” and who is sleeping with a sheriff half her age; Max Raymond, a brooding saxophone player married to and jealous of a salsa-singing Cuban nicknamed the Coyote; and Man Mortimer, a small-time criminal who dabbles in teen pornography and prostitution, not to mention murder and mutilation, and who seems to embody evil in its purest form.

Mortimer is the most interesting in the community, if only because he’s the most unpredictable and the most ambiguous. At a drive-in restaurant, still nursing a humiliating wound to his testicles from the previous night, he slices the waiter’s arm with a concealed knife, then speeds away. In general, evil is more interesting than good, and Mortimer’s evil is so intense and shadowy that he lends the novel a perverse energy. Hannah infuses him with a great deal of symbolism and meaning: Mortimer acts as the culmination of more than a century of deconstruction rather than Reconstruction, and he is a creation more than strong enough to carry such monumental literary weight.

As Mortimer terrorizes the residents of Lake Eagle, the characters’ various interactions — romantic and adversarial, violent and lustful — create a labyrinthine story with a gloriously tossed-off feel to it, a ratty improvisation that perfectly captures the dying South that serves as both setting and theme. For Hannah, the South has become a cheap tourist wasteland, shackling its past and parading its dubious culture about for a quick buck.

Throughout a dozen books in nearly 30 years, Hannah’s prose has been legendarily graceful, inventive, voracious, and startlingly direct. In Yonder Stands Your Orphan, the sentences still retain their almost supernatural ability to bend, warp, and angle, while his characterization — running the gamut from young boys to aging beauties to old farts fishing from the docks — is sly yet sharp. The plot takes its own sweet time, meandering occasionally but always into intriguing territory. Hannah remains in constant control of the seemingly haphazard events, developing his ideas thoughtfully and infusing the novel with a sad-eyed melancholy. Yonder Stands Your Orphan erupts in a sharp finale of blood and fire and death, the account of which the author delivers secondhand so as not to reveal too much. The effect is creepy and concussive, if only because so much is left to the imagination.

Known to brandish a knife or gun as much as he is to wield a pen, Hannah has written an intricate novel that should completely overshadow his own extraliterary legend. Ultimately, Yonder Stands Your Orphan proves so original and so amazingly well wrought as to be absolutely unforgettable. — Stephen Deusner

Empire Falls

By Richard Russo

Knopf; 483 pp.; $25.95

If the title of Richard Russo’s latest novel, Empire Falls, strikes you as a possible allusion to Gibbon’s treatise on the fall of the Roman empire, you’ve got the right idea. The notions conjured up by the title — fallen empires, the inevitability of any human glory, no matter how magnificent and ostensibly controlled, succumbing at last to entropy — are within the first 20 pages revealed to be accurate implications of what the reader might expect from this hulking novel.

The fictional town of Empire Falls, Maine, is home to the skeletal remnant of the once-mighty Whiting clan’s textile empire and those left behind, willingly or not, after the unemployment-fueled diaspora that took place when that empire collapsed. Central to this imbroglio is Miles Roby, our crestfallen protagonist and manager of the Empire Grill, who seems to be losing a slow war of attrition. But in this war, the metaphorical shrapnel embedded in Miles’ body are shards of his own shattered dreams. Dreams of academia.

Miles’ place at the grill was both portended and pursued. While he was in high school, the girl of his dreams worked there (as she still does), so it was only natural that he be inexorably drawn to this unattainable beauty’s lair. Yet when he finally escaped high school (and the vortex that his teenage desire made of the Empire Grill), his happy, hopeful days far away at an excellent college were cut short by the dreadful pull of his mother’s cancer. Miles came home to comfort her, though all Grace Roby wanted was for her son to flee Empire Falls without looking back. During the slow months of his mother’s demise, Miles worked long and hard back at the Empire Grill, covering for its terminally ill manager. The manager would never return. Miles would never leave.

So this is where we find Miles as the novel begins. His teen daughter, Tick, is his life. He’s losing Janine, his wife, to the owner of her health club, Walt. An older man who fancies himself a “Silver Fox,” Walt loves visiting Miles at the Empire Grill to either rub it in or make sure there aren’t any hard feelings regarding Miles and Janine’s impending divorce and his part in it. Miles’ right-hand man at the grill is his younger brother, David, whose burden is a self-inflicted ruined hand. David’s injury is the result of a spectacular drunk-driving accident and its harrowing aftermath, the description of which itself is worth the price of the novel, but he’s since cleaned up, except for the occasional toke. David and Miles’ father, Max Roby, is the prototypical ne’er-do-well. During their childhood, the brothers’ father could be counted on to either be sitting at a nearby bar drinking on credit or sojourning the East Coast for work incompetently painting houses. Observing all this local color from across the Knox River’s Empire Falls is the probably malevolent Francine Whiting, widow of C.B. Whiting, the third generation to man the helm of the Whiting textile empire.

Mrs. Whiting also happens to be the owner of the Empire Grill. It was she who fetched Miles home 20 years ago when his mother’s illness took its fatal turn. Grace Roby had years before been offered a position as Mrs. Whiting’s personal assistant when her job at the Whiting shirt factory was eliminated under new ownership. She accepted the position with some misgivings yet remained on until her death. It was only after the devastating blow of burying his mother that Miles buried himself in the tedium of the grill. Mrs. Whiting soon informed him that since he had kept it financially afloat for her in a tough time it would pass on to him at the time of her death.

In the years since Miles took this fateful offer his dreams have been reduced to little more than making his retirement off the sale of the Empire Grill, if and when it passes on to him, and thenceforth leading a pleasurable, blasé, blue-collar existence on some spot of land on Martha’s Vineyard.

But capricious fate will have none of this and will make sure everything changes drastically. A little life-altering tragedy creeps in before Empire Falls ends. For a man who considers himself first and foremost a comic novelist — and there’s plenty of laughs in this book — Richard Russo has ingeniously crafted a terribly real and at times macabre tale of lives tangled up and rent apart that spans nearly a century. But that’s not to say it’s a downer. The resolution, though dark, is strangely uplifting.

The ambition of this work is a bit boggling, and the circuitous manner in which all the narrative elements reconnect at unforeseeable junctures with startling clarity is nigh miraculous, not to mention hair-raising. And certainly beautiful is the author’s unquestionable command of voice. With characters this fully realized, you never hesitate to believe. I can recall only once or twice encountering a snippet of dialogue that came across as histrionic, but these were characters on the far periphery. Highly recommended.

Make sure you also check out Russo’s magnificent first novel, Mohawk, originally published in paperback by Vintage in 1986. It’s now available for the first time in hardback, courtesy of Knopf. Also highly recommended. — Jeremy Spencer

Visible Spirits

By Steve Yarbrough

Knopf; 273 pp.; $23

The dark, persistent spirits explored in Steve Yarbrough’s second novel, Visible Spirits, hold the characters captive to their violent and embarrassing pasts. The period and place is the Reconstruction South. The year is 1902. And the town is Loring, Mississippi.

Similarities to Howard Bahr’s The Year of Jubilo are obvious. In Bahr’s novel, Civil War soldiers return from battle and confront the reality of their new loss — the loss of almost every aspect of their previous existence. In Visible Spirits, Yarbrough’s central characters, the “entitled” Payne brothers, Leighton and Tandy, bungle through their distaste for each other as their home town faces turmoil: The African-American postmistress, Loda Jackson, is threatened into resigning, and President Theodore Roosevelt personally intervenes. There will be no mail delivery to Loring until the postmistress regains her position.

Yarbrough’s Payne brothers, and the unyielding memories of their deceased father, the powerful Sam Payne, are skillfully rendered. Even potentially positive characters, such as Leighton, Loring’s mayor and newspaper editor, whose struggles are real and worthy, never quite rises above the moral miasma of Loring’s citizenry. When Leighton recalls his participation in some of Sam Payne’s horrific acts against their servants — Sam at one time forces them into a vat of “dipping” solution to rid his plantation of ticks — the son seems to take on the sins of his father, justly or not. Tandy Payne’s return to Loring from New Orleans is anything but triumphant. Tandy is a survivor in the worst sense of the word. His gambling escapades have ruined him and almost gotten him killed. (He saves himself once by lighting a horse on fire.) Tandy’s acts of violence are coupled incongruously with his cowardice and bizarre good-ole-boy mentality. And the more the Payne brothers battle each other and the town, the more they evoke the terrifying specter of their father.

In contrast to Yarbrough’s confident handling of his male characters, Leighton’s wife, Sarah, is awkwardly portrayed. Her cold, dismissive manner is never adequately explained beyond her dissatisfaction with Leighton and their marriage.

Yarbrough scores, however, when he employs his knowledge of the Reconstruction South. The resistance to change in Loring resonates. When President Roosevelt focuses on the citizens’ misbehavior and applies his “federal” power, they once again feel conquered, but sympathetic readers will be few. Loring’s old guard is hardly worthy of concern. Interaction between blacks and whites is laced with bitterness. In fact, the only power the black community seems to possess is their control of spirits. When they threaten a haunting, even Sam Payne is unnerved.

That the Reconstruction South labored under a haunted past is highlighted by Yarbrough’s sometimes excessively elliptical style. Chapters flow back and forth, past to present, making Loring’s disconcerting history more so. The novel’s violent episodes and irredeemable characters hold little hope. Still, Visible Spirits concludes on a note of optimism. Leighton Payne visits an elderly Loda Jackson in the hospital and realizes the uncertainty of “his position and the space he’d taken up for so long.” — Lisa C. Hickman

Back When We Were Grownups

By Anne Tyler

Knopf; 274 pp.; $25

Pulitzer Prize-winner Anne Tyler, author of Breathing Lessons, The Accidental Tourist, and Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant, has created in this her 15th novel a stunning depiction of an average life — a life so remarkably normal that when subtle changes occur it is with resonating force.

At 53, Rebecca Davitch wakes up one morning to realize what a difference one decision can make. Overnight this grandmother and widow realizes that she no longer recognizes herself and wonders what her life might have been had she chosen a different path.

In a dream Rebecca imagines that she has a teenage son, a fair-complected, light-haired boy completely unlike her daughter or step-daughters. The dream sets Rebecca to wondering what life might have been like had she married her high school sweetheart, as she had planned, and not Joe, an older, abandoned husband and father of three young daughters and the eventual father of Rebecca’s daughter.

Rebecca remembers the 20-year-old college student she was before she met Joe. She has long since left this serious, solemn, intellectual girl behind. Painfully shy earlier in life, Rebecca marvels at the person she has become. She cannot reconcile the somber, idealistic girl with the dowdy, silly woman she is, and she certainly cannot see how Rebecca the wallflower became Rebecca the planner of other people’s parties.

With this in mind, Rebecca retraces her life. She calls her old beau, and she picks up a research project she dropped more than 30 years earlier. She tries to reinvent the girl she was.

Beautifully written and at times quite witty, in Back When We Were Grownups Tyler has created an utterly believable woman grappling with that most problematic of notions: self-identity. The book’s other female characters — Rebecca’s grown daughter and step-daughters — are as thought-provoking as they are hilarious: By turns strong, defiant adults and bratty, little girls, Tyler’s women will instantly remind every female reader of herself and every woman she knows.

Back When We Were Grownups also reminds us, whether we be women or men, that there is no skin as comfortable as our own. In the end Rebecca realizes this, but her adventure has been in discovering which skin is, in fact, hers. Therein lies the beauty of this wry, intelligent character study and lesson in personal epiphanies. — Rebekah Gleaves

How To Be Good

By Nick Hornby

Riverhead Books; 304 pp.; $23.95

Nick Hornby has never had a problem writing realistic characters. His protagonists may be flawed, but they are honest about their flaws and their voices are self-aware enough to provide a truthful, compelling narrative. But Hornby’s latest is quite a departure from his usual style and substance. In How To Be Good, the main character is a North London doctor whose sense of morality dictates her self-esteem. She wants to, and has to, be Good.

When we first meet Katie Carr she has just told her husband — via her cell phone, no less — that she wants a divorce. In reaction, her husband David, a newspaper columnist who dubs himself the “Angriest Man in North London,” quickly does a 180: He quits his job, becomes sweet and sensitive, and takes up with a spiritual healer. All of which annoys our not-so-long-ago-saintly protagonist.

Suddenly she is not the Good partner in the marriage. While her husband is handing their lunches and computers to the poor and taking in the homeless, all Katie’s doing is administering to her patients and having an affair. Unfortunately, our narrator/martyr is not so honest with the reader. Katie doesn’t believe it herself, but she goes on and on about how truly Good a person she is. The paradox: She is a Good person. But this not only limits Katie’s fullness as a character (she cares only about this one distinction), it is annoying. For someone as short on moral fiber as myself, it grew quite tedious reading about Katie’s obsession with being Good. Chuck it, I found myself thinking. So you’re annoyed at your kids or your husband and his live-in guru. That’s understandable.

But while Katie could use a smack in the face, How To Be Good nevertheless shows that Hornby is becoming a more mature writer. He’s still dealing with the delicate ties that bind, but this is a novel that revolves around a marriage on its last legs. The question is, Does this couple want to put this marriage out of its misery or let it limp on indefinitely?

Perhaps portrayed more honestly than any of the characters in the novel, the relationship is an evolving beast nourished on years of gradual mistrust and subliminal warfare. It is this “character,” not Katie the Good, not hubby the Angriest Man in North London, that Hornby really understands and defines.

Hornby may be going deeper in this latest book, but he loses some of the humor and hipness that readers delighted in in his previous work. He still intersperses pop-culture references aplenty, but there’s a more serious edge. And I suspect no one will ever see this as a glimpse into women’s psyches the way High Fidelity was said by some to be a glimpse into men’s. Hornby’s Katie is believable as a woman but certainly not astonishing as one.

This opinion is based on the author’s previous work. On its own merits, How To Be Good is enjoyable enough, engaging and all that. Even if it isn’t Hornby at his realistic best. — Mary Cashiola

Nick Hornby will be signing copies of How To Be Good at Davis-Kidd Booksellers on Sunday, July 15th, at 6 p.m.

John Henry Days

By Colson Whitehead

Doubleday; 389 pp.; $24.95

Colson Whitehead’s breakthrough novel The Intuitionist garnered an impressive number of critical accolades, including words such as “brilliant,” “dazzling,” and “bold.” Comparisons to the great (and aware of it) Thomas Pynchon arrived in noisy clusters like detoxifying winos at an all-night soup kitchen. It was, in the opinion of hack and flack alike, abundantly clear that this young African-American writer was going places.

Conceptually, Whitehead’s second novel, John Henry Days, lives up to and perhaps even eclipses the potential shown in his first outing. But it is marred, almost irreparably so, by too many ornamental words, too many modifiers sans action, too many passages which dazzle only by painstaking design. It’s the kind of elegant-by-the-numbers prose where trees reach to heaven like “outstretched fingers.” But if you can tolerate this kind of literary mugging, Whitehead’s John Henry Days is bursting with enlightened, thoroughly devastating commentary on the most semiologically urgent sound byte in the history of American folklore.

As we move beyond automation into this digital age of virtual experience and as the battle between man and machine shifts toward endgame, tales of John Henry’s race against the steam drill become more and more appealing. Hope is the attraction. Whitehead, however, looks beyond the obvious and discovers in its shadows that which should have been equally obvious. He then asks the hard question: Who won the race? Who really won? According to song and story, Henry emerged victorious from his battle with automation and progress, and for the better part of two centuries his dubious victory, fictional or otherwise, has provided the children of post-industrial America with the hope that humanity has not been rendered obsolete by its own cleverness. We have somehow glossed over — even glorified — the fact that, in the end, the winner drops dead from exhaustion. Hooray.

The protagonist of John Henry Days, J. Sutter, is neither hero nor anti-hero. He’s just another journalist in his milieu. Set squarely in the present, a time when every bum on the street has a press agent, Sutter and his fellow scribes, self-aware and generally self-loathing hacks all, have become professional freeloaders, far more concerned with the complimentary liquor and cheese that is part and parcel of the events they are dispatched to cover than they are with the events themselves.

The not-so-newsworthy activity du jour is the release of a new U.S. postage stamp honoring John Henry in the tiny West Virginia town where the steel driver supposedly met with his demise. The backward burg depends on the trickle of tourists who come to have their pictures made next to the steel driver’s statue — a statue that owes its existence to a well-known liquor company — and to take home a souvenir or two. It is an artificial environment both on the rise and in bad decline. This diorama as literary device, pioneered and perfected by George Saunders, is no less effective in Whitehead’s more overtly political hands, and the statue of John Henry quickly becomes a tragic clown. Birds abuse it. Henry’s bare, bronze chest is pockmarked because drunken rednecks use him for target practice. Once, presumably for shits and giggles, someone tied a rope to the statue and drug it through the streets behind a car, then abandoned it. It’s a potent and pertinent image, which, if too precious, is never heavy-handed and always rendered with a sufficiently dark but riotous humor.

Though his tone, even when describing atrocious labor conditions, is too nostalgic, Whitehead’s best writing occurs when he takes on John Henry the myth and makes the folk hero all too human. As if channeling the dreaming minds of a terrified nation aghast at the destructive, all-consuming forces set in motion at their behest, Whitehead writes of John Henry, “He looked at his hands, the big dumb mules at the end of his arms. They did what they wanted. Palms like territories. It was stupid.” And so it was. — Chris Davis

Choke

By Chuck Palahniuk

Doubleday; 256 pp.; $24.95

Victor Mancini, sex addict, is the narrator of Chuck Palahniuk’s Choke. Victor is obsessed with the idea of an ideal world where no one grows old or dies. But in real-world terms, Victor works a job in a historical reenactment society where all things are as they were in 1734. He also helps care for his mother, a former feminist revolutionary, who is lying in a private hospital and starving because she has forgotten how to eat. Victor is struggling to keep his mother alive so he can continue to care for her. Sounds confusing and is.

Private wards cost money, so Victor makes some extra scratch by causing himself to choke at various expensive restaurants. He knows that someone will rush to his aid and hopes that this same savior will take pity on him and send him money. Victor is only too happy to be their victim, but Victor is running out of restaurants, so he needs to think up something fast.

Enter Dr. Paige Marshall on his mother’s private ward. Marshall has a solution to save Victor’s mom. All Victor the sex addict has to do is impregnate the good doctor so she can abort the child and use its brain tissue to restore his mother.

It gets worse. The book begins and ends twisted, and the question remains: Does the author of Fight Club know what he’s doing? In the same way that Victor cannot get past his ideal universe, Palahniuk cannot take these bizarre circumstances and create a coherent story. Victor and Choke don’t make it much further than pop psychology.

At least the book reads well. Palahniuk writes in an easy-going, straight-forward manner only occasionally marred by carelessness or all-out jumble. Clarity is the book’s chief strength, and the description of action — from small to grand gestures — can be heart-rendingly real. The first scene in which Victor “chokes,” I submit, is one of the most terrifying, most graphic you’ll ever read.

But there are limits. Palahniuk slaps down words that sound awfully arty and slaps down some spectacularly grotesque scenes that are awfully unnecessary. In the end, Victor Mancini is left pretty inconsequential. And as is the case for many first-person storylines, if the narrator goes, so does the narrative. — Chris Przybyszewski

Ignatius Rising: The Life of John Kennedy Toole

By René Pol Nevils and

Deborah George Hardy

LSU Press; 234 pp.; $24.95

Eleven years after John Kennedy Toole killed himself, his novel A Confederacy of Dunces was published. The next year, 1981, the work received the Pulitzer Prize for fiction. The story of how the novel came to be published is legendary: Toole’s mother, Thelma, forced the work on author Walker Percy when he was teaching at Loyola University in New Orleans. The book finally met the public, and the public has since made it something of a cult classic.

But who was Toole? What sort of mind was it that created the righteously anti-heroic Ignatius J. Reilly, unemployable and obese, a man who left chaos and a cloud of flatulence in his wake? What was it about Toole that led him to brilliantly define New Orleans through a handful of outrageous characters? And why did he commit suicide?

The biography Ignatius Rising, by René Pol Nevils and Deborah George Hardy, sets out to answer these questions. But because the principal parties in Toole’s story have died, Nevils and Hardy have had to comb through old documents and track down surviving friends and acquaintances. They have pieced together a boyhood overwhelmed by a theatrical mother (she taught piano and elocution), a woman who lived through her son yet gave him little praise. They follow him through school and doctoral work at Columbia University. They follow him to the all-women colleges where he taught and into the army and his assignment in Puerto Rico, where he taught English to the native recruits and wrote the bulk of A Confederacy of Dunces. They follow him back to New Orleans, where he finished his novel. And though he worked hard to clean up the book, it was finally declared unpublishable. Toole grew paranoid, disappeared, and reappeared slumped over in his car, dead from carbon-monoxide poisoning.

That’s the who and the what. Now what about the why? These answers don’t come so easily to the biographers. The book is filled with “must haves” and “might haves.” The letters from Toole, for example, which the biographers showed to psychologists on the possibility that Toole was gay (he didn’t have a girlfriend, though he didn’t have a boyfriend either), are given a lot of attention.

The focus on Toole’s sexuality leads to this incredible passage: “John was obese, unkempt, and very attractive,” says one source, who accompanied Toole to a cottage where he realized his host was running a rooming house for male prostitutes in exchange for sex, a rooming house that just happened to be in the backyard of Toole’s uncle’s house. That this was nearly 40 years ago and that the source was an admitted alcoholic and profoundly depressed at the time don’t seem to concern the authors one bit. Their proof of the accusation? According to this source, someone drove him by the property after A Confederacy of Dunces was published, and he identified the rooming house as such.

The writers, who met in a journal-writing class, first pitched the idea of writing about the efforts to transfer A Confederacy of Dunces to the screen (since delayed). Their editor at LSU Press (the same press that published A Confederacy of Dunces) suggested the women do a biography instead. Nevils and Hardy prove adept at doing the legwork but less grounded in doing the mindwork. Rumors are recorded and half-formed theories are given too much credit, making Ignatius Rising shaky with speculation. — Susan Ellis

Categories
Cover Feature News

the Big Empty

Quick: If Aerosmith came to town, where would they play?

If you said The Pyramid, you’re right. When the band comes to Memphis in September, that’s where they’ll be rocking.

In the next few years, though, that question might not be so easy to answer. Not only will the new downtown arena provide a home for the NBA Grizzlies, it will also serve as another concert and event facility. Larger touring acts like Aerosmith will probably want to play there, continuing Memphis’ merry-go-round trend of trading one venue for another.

Back in the 1960s and 1970s, concert-goers packed the Mid-South Coliseum to see their favorite bands. As time went by, many concerts left the Coliseum for the greener grass of the Mud Island Amphitheater. A few years later, it was The Pyramid, and then the glittering stages of the Tunica casinos.

In sports the phenomenon is the same. The Liberty Bowl took over where Crump Stadium left off. The Redbirds left Tim McCarver Stadium for AutoZone Park. And RiverKings hockey deserted the Coliseum for the DeSoto County Civic Center.

While the Coliseum seems the hardest hit, many of Memphis’ venues are dark for much of the year. While sports teams come and go, two national trends have made the chances of getting a particular concert slimmer than before. Event promoters nationwide have consolidated into a few key companies, meaning less competition between shows. Along with that, tours have gotten shorter. An artist who at one time might have played 100 tour dates will now do about 30 or 40. And unfortunately, Memphis isn’t always a city they have to play.

“Memphis is on the cusp of whether or not it will be included in those 30 or 40 shows,” says Alan Freeman, general manager of The Pyramid.

Memphis does have an advantage because of its location — it’s on the way to and from other, larger cities — and its rich music history. Even so, this summer Memphis’ concert calendar looks weak. With the exception of a few shows — Aerosmith and 3 Doors Down among them — there’s not much going on.

Though the city may lack for concerts, it doesn’t lack for concert venues. Larger “name” acts can play The Pyramid, the Coliseum, or Mud Island, while smaller acts can take the stage at The Orpheum or the Bartlett and Germantown performing arts centers. When Lyle Lovett rides into town in August, he’ll be performing as part of the Memphis Botanic Garden’s new summer concert series. Memphis’ most popular music event, the Beale Street Music Fest, is at Tom Lee Park every year. Last month’s Christian music One Festival was at Shelby Farms. And bars all around town highlight bands still trying to make a name for themselves.

And then there is what Charlie Ryan, the general manager for Ticketmaster in the Mid-South, calls the single most important factor in Memphis’ concert market: Tunica.

According to Susan Hart, the entertainment manager for Sam’s Town Tunica, the casino hosts about 70 concerts a year. Just in the last couple of months, Wynonna, the Wallflowers, and Jerry Lee Lewis have all performed there. In comparison, The Pyramid does about 12 to 20 concerts a year.

“Tunica completely changed the dynamics of this market,” says Ryan. “What happened in Las Vegas is happening here.”

So do we have too many venues?

Jerry Schilling, president and CEO of the Memphis Shelby County Music Commission, says no.

“I don’t think so. I was actually concerned we were going to eliminate one or two with the no-compete clause.”

During early negotiations about the proposed downtown arena, a no-compete clause said large acts couldn’t play at another venue the same night as a Grizzlies game. That clause was eliminated, although the NBA arena retained first right of refusal for touring acts.

“More than likely,” Schilling says, “acts will probably want to go to the new arena anyway.”

Some even say Memphis doesn’t have enough venues.

Chris Taylor, operations manager of KISS FM, laments Memphis’ lack of a true “shed,” an outdoor venue with a 5,000-seat pavilion and a 5,000- to 10,000-seat lawn area. Sheds snag most of the summer concert traffic, especially festivals like the H.O.R.D.E. Tour or Lilith Fair.

“In a roundabout way,” Taylor says, “that’s what the Memphis Botanic Garden is doing with their newest thing.”

Schilling also applauds the Botanic Garden for hosting events such as Bluestock and the Isaac Hayes show earlier this month.

“We needed a venue in East Memphis that could do 5,000 to 7,000 people,” says Schilling. “The first one sold out. That shows it’s not about how many buildings you have. You’ve got to get the right acts playing at the right venue.”

But while having a facility in every corner of the city is good for consumers, it might not be great for the venues.

“The public can never have too many venues,” says Benny Lendermon, president of the Riverfront Development Corporation (RDC). “But if you’re looking at economic success, absolutely, you can have too many venues.”

The RDC assumes management responsibility for Mud Island on July 1st. “Because of competition, [the amphitheater] is either too big or too small,” Lendermon says.

Built over 20 years ago, the amphitheater seats about 5,000 and has long been a favorite concert site for many Memphians. Unfortunately, there just are not many shows there anymore. In its heyday, the Mud Island Amphitheater hosted about 35 significant events a year. Last year, it might have seen seven or eight.

“Mud Island found a niche a number of years ago in up-and-coming acts and oldie groups. When Tunica came around, it really hurt that opportunity,” says Lendermon.

The amphitheater, which isn’t compatible with some newer sound and lighting equipment, just couldn’t compete with the newer casino theaters.

And for many Memphis venues, it may be just a matter of time before something similar happens.

KISS FM’s annual Tango show used to be held at the Mid-South Coliseum. But this year the event was held at the DeSoto County Civic Center. Taylor says that the move came for a number of reasons.

“The backstage was perfect for our needs. It’s difficult to do a show with multiple bands. You need dressing rooms for all of them,” says Taylor.

“Some venues are not equipped for that. The Civic Center was,” he adds.

The station also wanted to have a special VIP area, something the Coliseum just doesn’t have the space for.

The Coliseum, which had a budget surplus only a few years ago, now operates at a loss. The question arises: Will the same thing happen to The Pyramid?

“We’ll probably be able to keep some events,” Freeman says. “Some events will probably move permanently.” He cites the Harlem Globetrotters game as one annual event that will probably make the switch.

Freeman, whose company also manages the Coliseum, estimates that the facility is probably in use 100 days a year; The Pyramid is in use about 80 or 90.

“If you’re looking at date availability, you could easily put everything in one venue,” says Freeman. It wouldn’t be a sell-out crowd every time, and it wouldn’t be a perfect fit for every event, he says, but it could be done.

Memphis Venues

Compiled by Mary Cashiola, Chris Przybyszewski, and Hannah Walton

PHOTO DAN BALL

AutoZone Park

Age: Babe in the woods

Seating: 14,000

Main Event: Redbirds games

The Usual Spectators: Young urbanites looking for a place to start their evenings,

families looking for a place to end theirs

High Point: Opened to sell-out crowds and a dream season for the ‘Birds

Low Point: None so far

Cost to Build: Including land and engineering, $80 million

In the Crystal Ball: If the park is kept up and service and entertainment levels

stay high, should remain the jewel of downtown

Bartlett Performing Arts Center

Age: Toddler

Seating: 350

Main Event: A September to June season of B- and C-list acts

The Usual Spectators: Suburbanites

High Point: Art Garfunkel, Judy Collins

Low Point: Nothing obvious

Cost to Build: $3.1 million

In the Crystal Ball: May have a difficult time competing with both GPAC

and the new Cannon Center for the Performing Arts

Cannon Center for the Performing Arts

(Cook Convention Center)

Age: Still in the womb; due date is August 2002

Seating: Just over 2,000

Main Event: Will be home to the Memphis Symphony Orchestra

The Usual Spectators: Society crowd, convention-goers

High Point: Remains to be seen

Low Point: Already a year behind schedule; both county and city, as well as

contractors, expected to bring lawsuits over the delays

Cost to Build: About $79 million for the entire expansion project

In the Crystal Ball: Poised to steal some of the Orpheum’s thunder

PHOTO DAN BALL

Crump Stadium

Age: Old-timer

Seating: 10,000

Main Events: High school football games

The Usual Spectators: High school

parents, students

High Point: Was once the site of legendary football games between Memphis State, Ole Miss, and Mississippi State

Low Point: No college ball in 40 years

Cost to Build: $35,000

In the Crystal Ball: Historic status or wrecking ball?

DeSoto County Civic Center

Age: Baby

Seating: 8,000-10,000

Main Event: RiverKings Hockey

The Usual Spectators: Memphians willing to make the drive for minor-league hockey

High Point: 2001 CHL playoffs

Low Point: Houn’Dawgs or Explorers games with 100 fans or less

In the Crystal Ball: Attendance at hockey games is already lagging. The Houn’Dawgs only lasted one season before league was disbanded. Look for a steady stream of conventions, private events, and high school proms.

Germantown Performing Arts Centre

Age: Just a kid

Seating: 824

Main Event: IRIS, as well as Broadway, dance, and family series

The Usual Spectators: East Memphians looking for a little class, families looking for a little culture

High Point: Last year IRIS season sold out

Low Point: In 1996, allegations of mismanagement and sexual harassment rocked the venue.

Cost to Build: $4.35 million

In the Crystal Ball: GPAC lures a variety of top-notch acts; should continue to be able to fill the house.

Liberty Bowl Memorial Stadium

Age: Getting up there

Seating: 62,380

Main Events: U of M football, The Liberty Bowl, Southern Heritage Classic

The Usual Spectators: Football fans

High Point: Probably the U of M’s victory over UT in 1996

Low Point: Short-lived CFL Mad Dogs experiment

Cost to Build: $3.7 million

In the Crystal Ball: Still no sign of the NFL

PHOTO DAN BALL

Mid-South Coliseum

Age: Approaching mid-life crisis

Seating: 11,555

Main Events: Occasional events such as last month’s “Clash of the Legends” wrestling match or April’s Al Chymia Shrine Circus but more often home to mundane matters such as jury selection

The Usual Spectators: Varies by event

High Points: 1980s U of M basketball games; 1960s Beatles concert

Low Point: Lost the RiverKings to the DeSoto County Civic Center in 1999; appears to be in free-fall

Cost to Build: $4.9 million

In the Crystal Ball: Without reliable long-term tenant, outlook is bleak, despite “Historic Building” designation.

Mud Island Amphitheater

Age: Going to keggers and taking mid-terms

Seating: 5,064

Main Events: Once home to thriving summer concert series, now occasionally hosting the likes of Laff Yo Azz Off and the All-Access Hip Hop Tour with Da Brat

The Usual Spectators: Hip, young urbanites

High Point: Jimmy Buffet concerts

Low Point: Now

Cost to Build: Part of $63 million Mud Island Park project

In the Crystal Ball: The RDC says it’s going to change marketing tactics next year. If new strategy works, great. If not, name could be mud.

The Orpheum

Age: Active senior

Seating: 2,500

Main Events: Ballet Memphis, Opera Memphis, traveling Broadway shows

The Usual Spectators: Culture Club

High Point: Many, including Cats, Phantom of the Opera, and appearances by Cary Grant, Gregory Peck, Jay Leno, Jerry Seinfeld, Burt Reynolds, former President Carter, and Gladys Knight, to name a few

Low Point: Sally Struthers starring in Grease

In the Crystal Ball: Stands to lose two of its major tenants — Ballet Memphis and Opera Memphis — once the Cannon Center for the Performing Arts opens

PHOTO DAN BALL

The Pyramid

Age: Teenybopper

Seating: 22,000

Main Events: Wonders Exhibit, U of M basketball, big-time concerts

The Usual Spectators: Tiger basketball fans; those who don’t mind shelling out the bucks to see Elton John and Billy Joel

High Point: Probably this year, with high U of M attendance, Billy Joel et al.

Low Point: Sidney Schlenker

Cost to Build: Over $60 million

In the Crystal Ball: New arena will be a tough competitor for concerts, especially if sightlines and acoustics are better.

Tim McCarver Stadium

Age: Old and in the way

Main Events: None

The Usual Spectators: None

High Point: Bo Jackson and Michael Jordan roaming the outfield

Low Point: Now

In the Crystal Ball: Ashes to ashes and dust to dust

USA Baseball Stadium in Millington

Age: Learning to drive

Seating: 5,000

Main Events: High school baseball

The Usual Spectators: Parents, college scouts

High Point: Training field for U.S. Olympic baseball teams in 1988, 1992, and 1996

Low Point: Lost the Olympic gig after 1996

In the Crystal Ball: Field is nicer than many minor-league parks; unfortunately Memphis just built nicest minor-league park in America

Tunica — The Wild Card

In November, the Isle of Capri opened a $14 million, 1,500-seat, two-theater entertainment center for Vegas-type shows. Gold Strike, Hollywood Casino, Horseshoe, and Sam’s Town all have built similar state-of-the-art venues.

The casinos host acts almost every night, many of the caliber that used to come to Mud Island Amphitheater. Entertainment runs the gamut: from Willie Nelson to Carrot Top to the Go-Gos. The future: Looks bright.

Categories
Cover Feature News

Drive On!

Tom Lehman

It’s a week before the FedEx St. Jude Classic at the Tournament Players Club at Southwind, and it’s raining. As Phil Cannon mounts the stairs to the viewing stand overlooking the 18th green, his foot slips. Cannon’s on his walkie-talkie faster than a downhill putt on ice.

“Hey,” he says, calling maintenance, “these steps on 18 are slick.”

“Yeah, they are pretty slick, aren’t they?” comes the proud response.

“No, I don’t mean they’re good slick,” Cannon says. “I mean they’re slippery! We almost fell on our butts coming up here.”

“Oh … uh, well, we’ll come see what we can do.”

It’s crunch time for the director of Memphis’ annual PGA TOUR stop and after 33 years of working the tournament, Cannon has learned to sweat the small stuff. Slick steps during the tournament could mean trouble, and trouble is what he needs to stay one step ahead of. Cannon has seen it all through the years: horrible weather, great weather, miraculous comebacks, temper tantrums, meltdowns, tears of joy. He’s been around some of the giants of the game — Player, Trevino, Norman, Price — and seen obscure journeymen take home an unexpected victory.

But Cannon doesn’t talk about that much. If you look up “modest” in your Webster’s Unabridged you’ll see Cannon’s picture. He prefers to pass along the credit to his staff and volunteers. He prefers to talk about what it feels like to hand a big check over to St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital each year. He prefers, in short, to remain well outside the beam of the spotlight. “The story,” he says firmly, “is not about me.”

Phil Mickelson

And he’s right, of course. The stories during this tournament week should be about the game and its players. Can Phil Mickelson, the second-ranked golfer in the world, shake his recent putting yips? Will John Daly play well, or fling a putter into a lake? Can Nick Price win in Memphis yet again? Will home cooking help Germantown’s young phenom David Gossett find his game? Will Jesper Parnevik wear those fabulous pink pants?

Or maybe one of the PGA’s young guns will use Memphis to step forward, like last year when Notah Begay snared the trophy with a brilliantly precise 6-iron over water to the 18th green. And what about the other relative newcomers — David Toms, Frank Lickliter, and Chris DiMarco — all of whom have played well this year?

The field is rich, perhaps the best ever. Tom Lehman, Lee Janzen, Steve Elkington, Bernhard Langer, and Nick Faldo, who have all won Majors, will lend their luminance to the tourney.

So who will emerge? Who will kiss the trophy? That’s the story.

Still, a little more about Phil Cannon couldn’t hurt.

“When I was a sophomore at White Station,” Cannon says, “I became a volunteer at what was then the Memphis Open. I went to college as a journalism major at Memphis State and worked in the sports information office with SID James Bugbee, who also worked for the tournament. He got me even more involved.”

After “cramming four years of college into eight,” Cannon stayed in the sports event business, eventually working for the Mid-South Coliseum for a number of years in the 1980s. In 1990 he went to work for the tournament full-time.

So what does a tournament director do the other 11 months and three weeks of the year?

“My old boss used to joke, ‘We wake up, play 18 with Arnie and Jack, then go to the office and answer a few phone calls,'” Cannon laughs. “But that’s hardly the case. Much of what we do is raise money to fund the purse and our operations.”

Bernhard Langer

Cannon manages a full-time staff of four, plus nine part-time workers and 1,500 volunteers. “Our volunteer Committee of 100 raised $1 million this year,” he says. “That’s a big story.” The money comes from sponsors, the sale of $35,000 “hospitality chalets,” ticket sales, and various other revenue sources. The tournament’s biggest sponsor is, of course, FedEx, which contributes “something well into seven figures,” according to Cannon. “Basically, it takes us 11 months to raise the money,” he says, “and one month to spend it. We’re a 501.C3 nonprofit charity, so what’s left over goes to St. Jude.”

And there has been more than a little left over. Since 1970 the tournament has donated more than $11 million to the children’s hospital.

Cannon, who doesn’t play golf, compares his job to running Memphis in May or an outdoor festival. “It’s event management and all that that entails,” he says. It’s crowd control and logistics and food and beverage service — and keeping the steps from being too slippery.

But the best part of his job, Cannon says, is working with the volunteers. “I always say to the media, ‘You want a story? Write about our volunteers. What they do is incredible.’ It doesn’t hit home until you see it. We had a father and daughter who buried their wife and mother the Tuesday before the tournament started last year. On Wednesday they were here working. It’s an amazing group of people.”

What’s the worst part of his job? Cannon likes it all. Except for one thing. “Every year I’m surprised by the number of people who come out to the tournament and get mad because they have to walk. I’m not sure what they expected, but I would tell Flyer readers, ‘Be prepared to walk.'” ·

The Local Angle

Want to root for a hometown hero? There are plenty to choose from at this year’s tourney.

Loren Roberts

Loren Roberts

The Germantown-based Roberts had the best year of his long career in 2000, with one victory and nine top-10 finishes. Known as the “Boss of the Moss” because of his pure putting stroke, Roberts’ victory at the Greater Milwaukee Open made him the oldest winner on tour (at 45) since Tom Watson won at age 48 in 1998. He ranks 87th in 2001 money earnings ($288,937), with his best finish being a tie for fifth at the Sony Open. He is a former member of the USA President’s Cup and Ryder Cup teams.

Doug Barron

The 31-year-old Barron won nearly $200,000 his rookie year (1997) and finished 108th on the money list for 2000. He currently ranks 181st in earnings, with $52,449 for 2001. His three top-10 finishes in 2000 were a career best.

Shaun Micheel

Playing out of Ridgeway Country Club, Micheel, 31, had his best year on tour in 2000, with three top-10 finishes and four top-25 finishes. His best tournament this year was the BellSouth Classic, where he tied for 11th. He ranks 119th on the money list in 2001, with $193,608 in earnings.

John Daly

David Gossett

Gossett is ranked 20th on the Buy.Com tour this year, with $45,217 in earnings. After failing to earn his PGA card last year in the seven tournaments he entered, Gossett received a sponsor’s exemption to play in this year’s FedEx St. Jude Classic. He has finished fifth twice on the Buy.Com tour in 2001. Gossett, who is from Germantown, has played the FedEx classic twice, making the cut as an amateur in 1998 (after shooting a first-round score of 66) and missing the cut as a pro in 1999.

John Daly

Though now playing out of Philadelphia, Mississippi, Daly, 35, remains a local favorite. The long-hitting, mullet-headed blond won two majors before he was 30, but well-publicized troubles with alcohol, gambling, and his marriage have eclipsed his early promise. He has only won two other times in his career. This year he leads the tour in driving distance (301.4 yds.) and ranks 100th in earnings with $254,260. · — BV

FedEx St. Jude Classic Facts and Figures

· 44th Annual Tournament

· Title Sponsor: FedEx Corporation (since 1986)

· Beneficiary: St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital ($11,498,416 since 1970)

· Economic Impact: According to a recent study, FESJC annually impacts the Memphis-area economy by more than $15 million; 88 percent of attendees are college-educated; 63 percent are at executive-level jobs.

· More than 1,500 volunteers contribute 20,000 hours.

· Attendance: Estimated at 150,000 annually

· Site: Tournament Players Club at Southwind

· The Course: Par 71; 7,030 yards. Eight lakes and three streams affect play on 11 holes.

· Field: 156 golfers. After 36 holes, field will be cut to lowest 70 scorers and ties.

· Purse: $3,500,000; winner’s share, $630,000

· Television Coverage:

Thursday, June 7th — ESPN, 2-5 p.m.

Friday, June 8th — ESPN, noon-2 p.m.

Saturday, June 9th — ABC, 3-5 p.m.

Sunday, June 10th — ABC, 2-5 p.m.

A Reporter’s Memories

bobby Hall covered the Memphis stop on the PGA tour for The Commercial Appeal from the late 1960s until last year. He retired from the CA in February and does some part-time work editing the tournament’s publications. We asked him to talk about some of his favorite tournament memories.

First on Hall’s list was Al Geiberger’s 59 in 1977: “In those days,” Hall recalls, “we had only a couple of staffers covering the tournament. There weren’t any high-tech scoreboards so we didn’t have a real idea of what was happening out on the course. I remember the day well because several cars caught on fire out in the parking lot and I had to go out and cover that. By the time I got back, the word was out that Geiberger was doing something marvelous. I was lucky enough to see him play the last hole.

“A million people will tell you now that they saw the whole round, but they didn’t because it was only the second day of the tournament and no one knew what he was doing.

“I do remember that he wasn’t a flamboyant guy. He made the putt on 18 and kind of threw up his hands and walked off. There really weren’t a whole lot of people there.”

Hall also witnessed tourney winner Jerry Pate jumping in the lake in 1981. “He pretty much told people as a joke,” Hall recalls. “He said, ‘If I win it I’ll jump in the lake.’ As it turned out, of course, he did win and people held him to it. He didn’t even hesitate.”

Through the years weather has wreaked havoc on the tournament, including torrential rains, blistering heat and humidity, and even tornadoes. “During a tournament in the 1960s,” Hall says, “there was a tornado warning. Everybody — spectators, players, caddies, officials — swarmed into the lower clubhouse. They were packed in like sardines, Arnold Palmer and everybody else. I remember there were some little old men — club members — coming out of the shower wrapped in towels. They walked out of the shower with no clue what was going on and here was this huge throng of people in their locker room.”

Two-time winner Nick Price also has a spot reserved in Hall’s memory bank. In 1993 the personable South African was on the leader-board every day of the tournament but didn’t know if he’d be able to stick around long enough to finish since his wife was in Florida expecting a child.

“Each day,” Hall recalls, “at the end of the round Price would say, ‘I may get a call and I won’t be here tomorrow. If I get a call from Florida, I’m out of here.’ But he was kind and cooperative enough to let me call him each night where he was staying and let me know if he was going to be around the next day. He was really a likable guy and very popular here. He had a caddy named Squeaky who died of cancer.”

Memorable shots? Hall’s seen a few in his time. He followed Greg Norman as he made his three-consecutive-birdies charge to victory in 1997. He saw Notah Begay‘s pin-point chip shot on the 17th hole last year. But the one that sticks with him the most came in 1990, and it also came on the 17th.

Tom Kite was stuck behind a tree about 190 yards out. He had to hit a huge banana slice around it to get to the green — a nearly impossible shot. He hit it to within a couple feet of the hole and made the birdie putt. Kite said at the time it was the best shot he’d ever hit in competition.”

How has all the new high-tech equipment affected the game? “How to judge that, I don’t know,” Hall says. “Sure it’s affected the game. People say, ‘What if Hogan had this new equipment, how would he play?’ But what if these [current players] had to play on the courses he played? Back then they weren’t manicured like they are today. Basically, I think a good pro could take a set of clubs off the shelf from Wal-Mart and play scratch golf, but I know everybody, including the pros, wants the top-of-the-line stuff.

“Of course, with my swing it doesn’t matter.” — BV

The FESJC –A Brief History

The tournament was founded in 1958 as the Memphis Open with an initial purse of $20,000. It was held at the Colonial Country Club, which was then in East Memphis. Billy Maxwell won the first event and collected $2,800.

In 1960 the name was changed to the Memphis Invitational Open. In 1969 entertainer Danny Thomas agreed to lend his name and influence to the event, which was renamed the Danny Thomas Memphis Classic (DTMC). In that event’s first year, 1970, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital became the event’s sole charity. Dave Hill won the first DTMC and collected $30,000 from the $150,000 purse.

In 1972 the event was moved to the new Colonial Country Club in Cordova. Lee Trevino won the first tournament at the new layout.

In 1977 the tournament saw two notable events. President Gerald Ford shot a hole in one on the 5th hole during the celebrity pro-am. And just two days later tour veteran Al Geiberger pulled off what Sports Illustrated called “one of the most significant athletic achievements of the 20th century” by shooting a 59. No small feat when you consider that the Colonial course was at that time the longest on the tour. Geiberger’s 13-under-par 18 holes still stands (though it has been tied twice since then) as a PGA tour one-round record.

In 1985 the tournament’s name was changed yet again — this time to the St. Jude Memphis Classic. One year later the Federal Express Corporation became the tournament’s title sponsor.

In 1989 the tournament moved to its current location at Southwind. · — BV

Categories
Cover Feature News

The Man Behind the News

Reporters and editors, newspapers and newsmakers, judges and bad guys, politicians and prosecutors — they come and go in Memphis. Richard Fields endures.

For three decades, most of it as a civil rights lawyer, Fields has influenced the way Memphians hold elections, treat jail inmates, educate children, allocate property taxes, build public housing, sell cars, promote firemen, and run day-care centers.

Memphians like to talk about bridging the gap between the black and white communities. Ladies and gents, behold the human bridge.

He’s a 53-year-old, California-born-and-bred, Stanford-educated sole practitioner who lives alone (unless you count the pet rooster) in the historic Wright Carriage House in Victorian Village. His father was a winemaker. He’s partial to jeans, cowboy boots, and loud open-necked shirts. He sports a gray beard and a ponytail. He can speed-dial most of the important politicians, judges, civil rights figures, and reporters in Memphis. His fingerprints, not to mention his quotes, both attributed and unattributed, are all over scores of front-page stories. He was one of the first white men in Memphis to be legally married to a black woman. The marriage didn’t take. Neither did the next three.

In other words, about as typically Memphis as your average purple snow-capped mountain.

Shown a partial list of his cases over the years, Fields studies it for a moment, nods, and then puts it down with a shrug: “I know a lot of people in Memphis.”

Fields came here in 1969 to work for the Teacher Corps at Georgia Avenue Elementary, an inner-city school. It was the year after Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated. Not a good time, for sure, but a time of opportunity just the same, with liberals, blacks, Jews, and women coming to the fore and making their marks (Fields was raised Lutheran).

“I never thought I’d be doing this when I graduated from college,” he says.

Two events were formative.

He married a black woman at St. Thomas Catholic Church, something taboo and even illegal in parts of the Old South. The marriage, he says, “gave me a different perspective than a lot of people.”

In the fall of 1969, to press their demands for representation on the all-white school board, black leaders organized “Black Mondays” demonstrations. More than 60,000 students and 600 teachers skipped school. The only white teacher was Richard Fields. The only principal was Willie Herenton.

It proved to be a good career move for both of them. Herenton rose through the ranks to become superintendent, with the support of the Memphis NAACP. Fields left teaching for law school at the University of Tennessee, then returned to Memphis in 1976 to work in an integrated civil rights law firm with the late Marvin Ratner and Russell Sugarmon. He immediately went to work on high-profile school desegregation cases, one of which involved Shelby County and is still very much alive today.

Jimmy Carter was elected president that year. One of the things he did was appoint more black judges than his predecessors had. Blacks were still in the minority in Memphis, but by 1980 they had won some judgeships, school board seats, and the superintendent’s job. It was a good time and place for a young civil rights lawyer to start his career.

Through thick and thin, Fields hitched his wagon to Herenton’s star. They did not always agree. Fields was the unbending idealist. Herenton was the embattled pragmatist. One thing they split on was busing.

“When I was superintendent, I did not want segregated schools, but we reached a point where in my opinion busing had run its course,” recalls Herenton. “My position was, ‘Gentlemen, let’s call a truce. Busing has not worked.’ Richard was adamant that I was trying to return the public schools to segregation.”

Fields stood by him as friend and personal attorney when Herenton weathered a scandal involving a relationship with a former teacher, Mahnaz Bahrmand. When Herenton ran for mayor in 1991, Fields and Dr. Harry Moore, a liberal preacher, were the only two prominent whites to publicly support him. Herenton’s 142-vote margin and 49 percent of the vote would have thrown him into a runoff but for a landmark federal court lawsuit pressed by Fields, the NAACP, and others and resolved that year.

“Dr. Herenton,” he says, “has been absolutely a godsend to Memphis.”

And to Richard Fields. Backing Willie Herenton in 1991 was a little like buying stock in AOL at $10 a share. Herenton has been mayor for 10 years and counting and shows no signs of giving up the job. Fields has been there to hold his coat. He has been, at various times, the mayor’s personal lawyer, political adviser, schools liason, and spin-master on issues ranging from the 1999 mayoral election to the controversial firing of a police lieutenant to the proposed NBA arena.

“I give him advice when he seeks it,” says Fields.

Fields’ law practice, meanwhile, has ranged far and wide.

“My theory of law,” he says, “is do as many cases as you can that involve the broadest impact.”

What sets him apart from other busy lawyers is not only the nature of his cases but also his media connections, particularly with The Commercial Appeal and this newspaper. It would be nearly impossible to have been a beat reporter in Memphis over the past 25 years without crossing paths with Fields in the state or federal courts or at the city or county school board. Approachable and savvy, he is often a source for newspaper reporters and helps “spin” or influence their stories. What appears to be reportorial research is sometimes, on closer inspection, a repackaging of Fields’ research, briefs, depositions, or the comments of his clients or associates.

In newspaper terminology, he can set the agenda, often by merely filing a lawsuit. For example, “Fired officer sues for $6 million” was the headline for a front-page story in The Commercial Appeal on Harold Hays and the sheriff’s department in 1996. Typically, the party being sued, the sheriff’s department in this case, declined comment. The attention-grabbing $6 million figure, as is often the case in such lawsuits, was mainly window dressing; the lawsuit was settled for $650,000.

“I certainly don’t control the media,” says Fields. “I think I have credibility with the media, but that is partly the nature of the cases.”

A computer search of stories about Richard Fields turned up over 200 articles from The Commercial Appeal over the last decade, which is as far back as such searches go for that newspaper. The majority of them ran on the front page or the front of the Metro page. Some led to whole series. A partial list (see “Richard Fields’ Greatest Hits,” page 19): sales practices at Covington Pike Toyota, Cherokee Day Care, the Shelby County Jail, school desegregation, and corruption in the sheriff’s department. Some of the reporters who used to write about him are now the editors who make the decisions about where the stories run, including the CA’s Metro editor Charles Bernsen and deputy managing editor Otis Sanford.

In The Memphis Flyer, in the last year alone, Fields has been a key source for cover stories about the jail, foster children, and public housing.

A publicist who got a fraction of that attention for a client would be hailed as a genius. With local news increasingly displacing national and international news in newspapers and television newscasts, Fields highlights the uneasy working relationship between lawyers, who are hired advocates, and reporters, who are supposed to be objective. Each side gets something. Publicity can help a lawyer get business, especially if class-action status is sought, or pressure the other side to make a settlement, as in Fields’ lawsuit this year against Bud Davis Cadillac. The reporter gets a story with a crusading bent, news appeal, and gritty details that might have been mined by the reporter or might have been handed over by the lawyer.

Editors at The Commercial Appeal declined to comment for this story.

Sometimes Fields is on the side of the angels. He handled a case for low-income homeowners against former assessor Michael Hooks and won more than $3 million but took no fee. Other cases, however, have a distinct political angle, often against members of the Ford family, who happen to be the main rivals of Mayor Herenton.

In the Cherokee Day Care case, Fields said state senator John Ford conspired with operators to steer state funds to Cherokee. The case was hobbled by an unfavorable ruling in federal court, but there is a separate grand jury probe on similar issues. Fields himself was going to become a day-care broker consultant for Herenton, who had plans for the city to become the state’s day-care broker in Shelby County. The broker system was scrapped instead. As a lawyer, campaign adviser, and media contact, Fields did all he could to keep the story alive during the 1999 mayoral election when Herenton ran against Joe Ford.

Also during that campaign, Fields was wearing his “campaign attorney” hat when, in the words of The Commercial Appeal, he “drafted an official complaint” to the Shelby County Election Commission about certain actions of campaign workers for candidate Joe Ford. Sounds mighty serious. In plain language, Fields didn’t do squat. But this dog-bites-man fluff got prominent coverage that helped keep Ford on the defensive.

Fields’ favorite whipping boy is Sheriff A.C. Gilless and the Shelby County Jail. Since 1993 he has won seven settlements and judgments against the department totaling $2.43 million. He (and co-counsel in five of the cases) got about 30 percent of that. Another jail inmate suit seeking $20 million is pending. Gilless did not return calls seeking comment.

“I’m not a self-promoter, but certain exposure helps the public understand what kind of issues I deal with and what solutions I hope for,” Fields says. “I give the reporters facts and expect them to investigate fully.”

Not everyone does. This newspaper was burned recently when it failed to distinguish between monetary amounts sought and amounts actually paid in jail cases.

And not everyone likes what they see either. Even Herenton says, “A lot of my friends don’t understand my friendship with Richard because he irritates the hell out of them.” WREG-TV Channel 3 reporter Mike Matthews, a tough questioner of Herenton, is one reporter Fields won’t talk to because he thinks Matthews tries to embarrass the mayor.

Fields used Black Monday-style tactics against automobile dealers Bud Davis Cadillac and Covington Pike Toyota on behalf of black employees, or “our guys,” as he calls them. Kent Ritchey, general manager of Covington Pike Toyota, told The Commercial Appeal the picketing was aimed at “maximizing settlement opportunities.” Contacted by the Flyer, Ritchey declined to comment about Fields. Bud Davis also declined comment.

Fields says fair is fair. The car dealers, he says, launched their own “preemptive publicity” aimed at polishing their image. He does not plan to let up.

Last week Fields got a phone call as he posed for a picture for this story. The Covington Pike Toyota story had attracted some national interest. It seems Memphis might be getting a visit from Jesse Jackson. Fields tucked his cell phone back in his pocket and grinned.

You can e-mail John Branston at branston@memphismagazine.com.


Richard Fields’ Greatest Hits

Michael Hooks Sr.

Inequities in residential reappraisal, 1992-2001. “It was difficult because I had to sue Michael Hooks as assessor and I was friends with him. My clients were the poorest of the poor. Michael should have done it himself.”

Memphis Housing Authority, 1992-2001: “If there was ever a plantation system, MHA was it. They’re on the right track now, but basically they need to tear down all public housing and create mixed middle-income housing like what’s planned for Greenlaw and LeMoyne Gardens.”

Harold Hays (whistleblower in sheriff’s department), 1996-1999: “The best client I ever had and, ironically, the most establishment. His ethics were unquestionable.”

Mayoral election, 1991: “I was one of Dr. Herenton’s original white supporters and encouraged him to run. His comment was, ‘But I’m not a politician.’ I said, ‘That’s good.'”

Mayoral election, 1999: “I made sure the day-care issue got emphasized as a real scandal for this city.”

W.W. Herenton

Mahnaz Bahrmand, (former MCS teacher who sued then-Superintendent Herenton over a love affair), 1989: “Dr. Herenton came out of that with a true understanding of who his friends were and weren’t. Beyond that, it was private, and that’s all I’m going to say.”

Cherokee Day Care, 1999-2001: “An unbelievable scandal involving black entrepreneurs engaged in a corrupt scheme to the disadvantage of poor children and their parents.”

Tennessee foster children, 2000-2001: “One of the finest consent decrees I have seen in my life. It affects children most in need.”

School desegregation, 1976-2001: “As a former teacher with a master’s degree in education, I had to do those cases. Education is the most important issue in the city right now. Along with the Legal Defense Fund, I will continue to pursue the Shelby County school desegregation case which dates back to 1961.”

Memphis elections and local and state redistricting, 1991-1997: “I was the lawyer for the NAACP on the runoff provision in city elections. You know, I had forgotten about that one.”

John Ford

McKinney Truse (a low-income East Memphis neighborhood leveled for a Home Depot), 1987-1997: “A crowning moment in my career. We had to find 300 people all over the world and keep them together for 10 years. We won $9 million from Home Depot. Our fee was 9 percent over 10 years. We didn’t even make our hourly rate.”

Shelby County Jail, 1991-2001: “One of the true scandals of the Eighties and Nineties. Until Judge McCalla came along, no one was willing to deal with it in a systematic fashion, and nobody but Harold Hays was willing to speak out against the corruption in the sheriff’s department.”

Sales practices at Covington Pike Toyota, 2001: “It took guts for The Commercial Appeal to run that story about an advertiser.”

Categories
Cover Feature News

Good News, Bad News

They are anonymous. They are chosen at random. They are each responsible for roughly $8.8 million of someone else’s money. They are the 5,000 Nielsen households whose television viewing habits determine which television shows flop or fly and which broadcasting companies will get the biggest slices of a $44 billion pie. As Nielsen puts it, their media research information is “the currency in all the transactions between [television] buyers and sellers.” Though larger media markets, Memphis included, receive ratings information daily, the majority of Nielsen’s research information is gathered during four one-month periods known as “sweeps”: November, February, May, and July. During these periods viewers can expect to witness splashy premieres, take in an overhyped miniseries or two, thrill to dozens of cliff-hanging season finales, and experience countless pumped-up, often bizarre regional newscasts chock full of late-breaking weather updates. Take a drink every time you hear the word Doppler used during sweeps and you’ll never play “Hi, Bob” again.

If Nielsen information is currency, viewers are the standard. Advertising rates for television newscasts are determined by cost per thousand viewers and naturally, the larger the viewing audience, the higher the rates. But competition is stiff and getting stiffer by the hour. With the continued growth of cable and the convenience of the Internet, not to mention the glut of radio stations, newspapers, and magazines, television news programs have to fight harder than ever to attract and maintain people’s attention. They have to entertain and stimulate as well as inform. In recent years sweeps periods have seen some news programs turned into garish, fear-mongering game shows offering sensationalized crime stories, wads of cash, and oodles of other fabulous prizes in lieu of solid reporting. Items teased as serious news turn out to be little more than promotions for network programming. And while the trend toward tabloid television continues to hang on in certain corners, it appears that, in Memphis at any rate, a backlash is underway.

“A few years ago we gave away new Toyotas [during sweeps],” says Bob Eoff, general manager for WREG Channel 3. “We received a million postcards from viewers and we saw a definite spike in the [ratings] meter. It scared us. We said, ‘It’s time to get back to business.'” WPTY Channel 24 director of operations Marshall Hart notes that you see a number of things in broadcast journalism today that would have been frowned upon in previous decades, and he likewise denounces big sweeps period giveaways.

“So you are giving away new cars,” Hart says with vague disdain. “You see the [ratings] meters go up. Then [sweeps] are over, the car giveaways stop, and things go back to normal. But because of this stunt advertisers have to pay a premium, and they aren’t getting their money’s worth.” While WPTY doesn’t do big giveaways during sweeps periods, Hart is not entirely opposed to dispensing occasional freebies. “Everyone does it,” he says. “We do it to attract attention and create sampling. It’s like if the Flyer went and dropped a copy of the paper into everybody’s mailbox. Some people who have never seen the Flyer before might say, ‘Hey this is great’ and start picking it up. For people who don’t like the Flyer already, it would confirm why they don’t like it.”

There was a time, not so long ago, when stations might hold big stories and special investigative reports for sweeps periods, but everyone seems to be in agreement that that time has long gone. “Between the newspapers and the other stations the market is so competitive now,” Eoff says, “we can’t hold stories for sweeps.” What stations can do, however, is tailor their sweeps stories to appeal to the broadest audience base possible. Stephanie Croswait, news director for WPTY, explains the conundrum, saying, “You want to break the important stories, but you also want to run stories that people are interested in. And what people are interested in aren’t always the big stories. Sometimes you have to run the more interesting stories first to bring [viewers] into the tent for the important stories.”

In a perfectly spun statement, WMC Channel 5’s general manager, Howard Meagle, says, “Here at WMC-TV we work hard to deliver high performance standards every day whether we are in sweeps or not. We think ratings confirm that fact.” After all, the top-rated news program is the best news program, no? Well, not necessarily. Though you’ll never hear it from news stations touting their performance rating, Nielsen makes it perfectly clear in its literature that its ratings system in no way reflects the quality or standards of a given program. When considering issues of popularity versus merit it’s hard to ignore the words of William Shakespeare who, in a deft and still-accurate description of mass consumption, wrote, “[People who] won’t give a doit to relieve a lame beggar will lazy out ten to see a dead Indian.”

In an attempt to help viewers determine who is dispensing quality programming and who is putting on a three-ring circus, Flyer staffers (editor Bruce VanWyngarden and staff writers Chris Herrington, Mary Cashiola, and Rebekah Gleaves) got together to provide “team coverage” of four local television news outlets’ performances last week. Their reports follow. — Chris Davis

WMC Channel 5 (NBC)

Joe Birch and Donna Davis, anchors; Dave Brown, weather; Jarvis Greer, sports.

Joe Birch

Whew! How about that crime spree last week? Scary, huh? You missed it? You must not have been watching Channel 5. WMC’s 10 o’clock newscasts last week exemplified “crime-time” television. In fact, if you watched WMC all week you might still be locked in your house quivering with fear. On Monday night the lead story was about “bold and brazen criminals on the loose in the Mid-South.” The “crime spree” story loosely connected a series of house break-ins and a man who was picking up people at bus-stops and robbing them. The reporter summarized thusly: “The situation is leading police to say, ‘Criminals are just plain crazy!” Which police officer, if any, actually uttered these immortal words we never learned.

One officer was quoted as saying: “These days when you get kidnapped you don’t come back.” Never mind that the bus-stop robber released all five of his victims. Reporter Joyce Peterson capped the two-minute segment on the “mean, mean season” by adding helpfully, “Crooks, thieves, and killers are doing the crime but not doing the time.” The basis for this statement? Who knows? Channel 5’s reporting was long on histrionics and fear-mongering and woefully short on content.

The other “Top Story” of the week was continuing “coverage” of actor Robert Blake and his murdered wife. The Blake story was heavily promoted at the top of all five newscasts but at no time during the week was much fresh news on the story presented. On Monday, however, after a one-minute rehash of various rumors and speculations about the case, there was a delicious moment of unconscious irony as we were taken “live” to Channel 5’s “Satellite Center” to hear reporter Keith Daniels tell us that police had asked the media to “stop circulating rumors and speculation.” Other highlights of the week’s coverage included a videoclip of O.J. Simpson offering advice to Blake: “Robert, man, this kind of situation can make you so frustrated that you want to go out and hit somebody.” So can this kind of news.

Another crime story was “Protecting Your Privacy,” in which we were breathlessly informed that “anyone can now link your phone number to your address. Stalkers and child molesters can use the Internet to find where you are! Parents are worried!” The story detailed how so-called reverse directories could be used to get an address by cross-referencing it with a phone number. Of course, if they have your name, stalkers and child molesters could also use the phonebook! But that’s another story.

Other stories covered during the week were updates on “Hoop Dreams,” WMC’s handle for all stories about the NBA and Memphis. There was good footage of Mayor Jim Rout at the County Commission meeting one night; also interviews with the Grizzlies’ coach and general manager while they were in town. Sending a reporter down to the barbecue fest to interview employees of FedEx was an interesting idea but not particularly informative.

There was a moving three-minute feature on Thursday night about the recovery of a man who had been hideously deformed in a plant explosion. Part of a series called “Miracles at the Med,” the story was effectively told without over-the-top dramatics.

Channel 5’s weatherman, Dave Brown, did his usual yeoman work explaining the various radar maps and presenting the five-day forecast in “Pinpoint Weather.” He also promoted the “Birthday Bash” segment, WMC’s most overt bow to sweeps month. (If your birthday is read on the air, you can call in and win $1,000 or more.)

Another curious part of Channel 5’s newscast is the “Family Healthcast,” a one-minute segment which seems to exist mainly to separate two long commercial breaks. Family Healthcast stories last week included such oddities as the news that you and your family could take advantage of reduced first-class fares on Northwest Airlines and a plug for NBC’s The West Wing under the guise of Martin Sheen’s character’s admission that he had multiple sclerosis.

It was a fairly slow week for sports, with Jarvis Greer doing a competent, low-key job covering high school and college baseball tournaments, the Grizzlies, and the Redbirds.

But when it comes to the news, it seems that the legacy of departed station manager Bill Applegate — the man who juiced up WMC’s news coverage to its current hyperbolic level — lives on. It’s a shame, because anchors Birch and Davis are a good team, as professional in appearance and delivery as their peers in any major market station. They deserve better. — Bruce VanWyngarden

WREG Channel 3 (CBS)

Pam McKelvy and Jerry Tate anchors; Tim Simpson, weather; Glenn Carver, sports.

Pam McKelvy

Watching WREG you hardly would have known last week was sweeps week. But listening to the reporters and anchors read the news, you might have had some idea that everyone there was working overtime to make the normal news a little more interesting. Though the new stories on WREG were business as usual, they tended to be peppered with amusing delivery styles.

Channel 3’s mix of general news, human-interest stories, weather (and weather, and weather), sports, and the occasional obscure investigative series was impressive and impressively not sensationalized. In fact, not only did the 6 p.m. and 10 p.m. newscasts avoid the attention-grabbing news stories typical of sweeps months, WREG rarely deviated from the exact same stories — told over and over again.

On WREG this past week, viewers got double and triple doses of weather (sometimes six minutes during a single newscast) and lots and lots of sports, particularly anything related to the Vancouver Grizzlies or Memphis Redbirds.

One of last week’s oft-repeated stories was about the arsons at Goodlett Elementary School, with each airing showing the same maudlin footage of charred playground equipment and upset parents. At one point reporter Stephanie Scurlock even employed Dr. Evil-esque dramatic delivery, saying, “Playground equipment doesn’t come cheap. It costs … [suspense] 10 … thousand … dollars.” Unfortunately, the station did not show Scurlock on screen, so we’ll never know if she held her pinkie finger to the corner of her mouth while saying that.

Other segments, again if not overly sensational, were equally amusing. During coverage of the murder of Codes Inspector Mickey Wright, WREG repeatedly aired a lengthy interview with the suspect’s young male roommate. Filmed at home and sans shirt, during one laugh-out-loud moment, the camera even zoomed in on the man’s presumably homemade tattoo of a bucking horse with the caption “The Legend” emblazoned across his arm. Had it not been network news, it could have passed for a segment on The Daily Show.

Meanwhile, in his report on shigellosis, a bacterial disease affecting Forrest City, Arkansas, reporter Omari Fleming kept things interesting by slipping in phrasing that would have left Johnnie Cochran green with envy.

“Washing your hands is all you need to do — to keep shigella from infecting you”

was how Fleming opted to end his not-so-hard-hitting news segment. Moreover, the same story featured a “man on the street” interview with an Arkansas woman who thought her daughter might have had shigellosis but later learned that her daughter was healthy.

Like the shigellosis piece, many of the other WREG news packages that ran last week had “man on the street” interviews showing citizens saying things like “I want my NBA Now” while waving to the camera. Likewise, several days last week WREG aired an interview with a mustachioed and shower-capped female in a story about a good Samaritan who was shot while trying to help a fleeing victim escape a downtown neighborhood.

But the most amusing moment seemed to be unintentional. During a story about the NBA pursuit team’s efforts, anchor McKelvy punted to “Elliot Cohen, standing outside the NBA offices.” However, the next image showed Cohen standing in the WREG newsroom. For his part, Cohen recovered well, ending his segment with “Elliot Cohen, reporting live from the newsroom.” At least he was alive.

This being the week of Memphis in May’s barbecue cooking contest at Tom Lee Park, Channel 3 began its barbecue fest coverage on Monday, a full two days before the event started. The barbecue fixation continued throughout the week, peaking with reporter Mike Matthews’ (arguably the hardest working man in Memphis television news) vexing report on Friday night. Matthews, in between visually interesting images of pig decorations and searing meat, would say things like “Viva Pork Vegas” and “I’m getting out of here before someone tries to baste me.”

While the station did not employ sensational techniques, WREG did use lots of computer graphics. A full-screen “BIG STORY” banner graphic appeared before each evening’s top news story, and a segment titled “You Choose the News” allowed viewers to vote on the station’s Web site for the story they most wanted to see.

WREG did grant itself a few guilty sweeps pleasures, namely a segment where anchor Jerry Tate teased repeatedly with the question, “Which costs more: sending your kids to school — or to prison?”

Likewise, a story on Invisalign, a company that manufactures clear dental braces, aired incessantly at the end of the week, each time with slightly different footage. On Friday night this story was advertised during the 6 o’clock newscast to be on “right after Batman and Robin airs on CBS tonight.” Similarly, consumer reporter Andy Wise’s popular Thursday night “Does It Work?” series featured an interesting, if outright advertorial, piece on flame-retardant paint. During the almost five-minute segment, Wise even told viewers about a link to the manufacturer’s Web site on WREG’s own Web site.

Certain gaffes and dramatic excesses aside, last week WREG presented mostly responsible newscasts, with mostly informative and responsible stories, the only drawback being that they presented them over and over again. — Rebekah Gleaves

WPTY Channel 24 (ABC)

Renee Malone and Bill Lunn, anchors; Brian Teigland, weather; Greg Gaston, sports.

Renee Malone and Bill Lunn

In an age when the absolute worst is expected of local news coverage, particularly during a sweeps period, WPTY delivered a relatively honorable newscast last week. During the 10 p.m. nightly newscast on Channel 24, some of the undesirable elements that have become ubiquitous features of the local television news industry were noticeably absent. There were no cash giveaways. There were no promotional pieces for network programming masquerading as “news.” There were no false “breaking news” stories and very little in the way of flashy video of no local news value (footage on Tuesday night’s newscast of an unoccupied runaway train in Ohio was, admittedly, pretty spectacular).

But does the Memphis that WPTY’s newscast presented actually jibe with reality? Channel 24 may well be less rabid in this regard than their competitors, but at a time when violent-crime rates are falling, WPTY still presents a Memphis overrun with young black and Hispanic men committing mayhem and spends a disproportionate amount of news time following the exploits of what one piece labeled “Mid-South predator[s].”

In the Memphis presented on WPTY’s newscast, the state budget crisis and subsequent tax battle and the debate over public funding for an NBA arena are on equal footing with a teenager accused of robbery being freed by a possibly faulty East High School security video (described as “an accused robber’s best friend”) and the arrest of a criminal captured on an ATM surveillance video as stories that demand nightly updates.

Local violent crime accounted for roughly 40 percent of WPTY’s lead segments last week, but the reliance on the police blotter for news coverage was rather inconsistent. Tuesday night’s news actually led with the state’s tax debate and federal interest-rate cuts before moving on to the ATM surveillance footage of the captured criminal. On Wednesday night, the station led with five straight local violent-crime stories, with story number six about the conviction of the Florida teenager charged with murdering his teacher.

The station’s most sensationalistic reporting occurred on Friday night’s newscast when the lead story about break-ins in a Hickory Hill neighborhood was introduced with the following voice-over: “For days families across the Mid-South have been taking extra care to lock their doors and look over their shoulders.” Anchor Bill Lunn then moved into the report with this: “Dangerous robbers have been forcing their way into Hickory Hill homes threatening to kill residents right in their own houses .”

But that kind of hyped crime reporting was balanced by a responsibly reported week-long “24 Investigates” series on problems with the Tennessee Department of Human Services. In terms of screen time, this series was given more space than all of the violent-crime coverage combined.

As far as fluff/human-interest coverage, Channel 24 mostly ignored the kind of national celebrity tidbits that local news typically indulges in, though on Thursday night the station did spend more time teasing the audience with footage of formerPresident Clinton getting egged than it did on the story itself. Instead, Channel 24 stuck to local human-interest features — on Thursday night a local man who calls himself “Captain Fireball” befriended by a South Memphis fire station and a goose with a fish hook stuck in its leg on Friday night.

Truthfully, with over-the-top crime reporting de rigueur on local television news, the most offensive thing on Channel 24’s newscasts last week was probably the incredibly treacly theme music for Wednesday night’s “A Waiting Child” feature. — Chris Herrington

WHBQ Channel 13 (Fox)

Claudia Barr and Steve Dawson, anchors; Jim Jaggers, weather; David Lee, sports.

Claudia Barr

Miss a juicy story? Don’t worry, Fox 13 might run it twice.

The station ran a story about the effectiveness of new diet drug Body Solutions titled “Fact or Fat?” during the Monday night broadcast. The story, which included interviews with a radio disc jockey paid to take the drug, someone who used it for a month, and a doctor, ran again the following Sunday.

Both times “Fact or Fat?” ran it was followed by another segment on physical appearance: Monday it was cheap makeup tips; on Sunday, the station explored the growing popularity of teeth-whitening.

Then, during 13’s Thursday night broadcast live from the Memphis in May World Championship Barbecue Cooking Contest at Tom Lee Park, the exact same story about the Miss Piggy Contest ran near the beginning and at the end of the broadcast. Same video footage, same voice-over. Just in case you missed it the first time.

As the official station of the barbecue contest, Fox 13 broadcast live from the park for much of the week, covering everything from all-female barbecue teams to barbecue ice cream, barbecue-sauce wrestling, and the world’s only barbecue magazine.

During the rest of the week, though, it was business as usual for Fox 13. The station stayed away from large-scale sensationalism while playing up big stories and big names, as well as running its own news segments alongside network television shows.

The nightly broadcasts started with 10 minutes of top stories before cutting to the first commercial; even live from barbecue fest, those stories stuck to the theme of crime and punishment. Stories of Memphis shoot-outs, kidnappings, arson, and home invasions topped the news, as well as arrests of wanted criminals, and trials for crimes already committed.

The May 6th kidnapping of a woman who was stuffed in the trunk of her car and then pushed into a lake was a top story for several days, first as news, then with tips from the victim on how viewers could protect themselves from being kidnapped, and then when police had a suspect.

Another segment told viewers that car break-ins were on the rise downtown — although no study or numbers were cited — and, after giving a list of tips on protecting your property, members of the news team took to the streets to see if they could find any cars with valuables in plain sight. They triumphantly reported they found a lady’s purse in an SUV in just 30 seconds.

The station routinely teased items from its “World Minute,” including Clinton’s egging, President Bush’s daughter’s arrest, and a woman who kidnapped her cats after her divorce. Because “World Minute” is a 60-second news broadcast covering several stories, each teaser was only seconds shorter than the full story.

On Wednesday, the station ran “The [Real] Boot Camp,” its weekly tie-in with the network’s reality show Boot Camp, and “Mid-South’s Most Wanted,” a smaller, newsified version of America’s Most Wanted.

Perhaps the most telling of all Fox 13 coverage was a segment on Robert Blake’s wife. The story focused on a statement from the Los Angeles police department asking the media to stop disseminating rumors and misinformation about the case. The station then ran footage of one of Blake’s friends talking about Blake having a bullet with Bakely’s name on it. The segment ended by saying the man’s statements were “just the comments the LAPD wants to keep out of the limelight.” — Mary Cashiola

Categories
Cover Feature News

The Heat Is On

Barbecue judging is great, so long as you’re hungry, but get full and it becomes a task, torture even. Another rib to eat, some more shoulder to sample, the sight of a whole hog — gutted, boned, and splayed out, legs akimbo on an elaborately garnished grill — all become enough to make your stomach turn.

Parking at festivals is always scarce. Sunburns are de rigueur. Sunglasses on, sunglasses off, repetition, monotony. The judges’ days are spent under the wedge of shade provided by a sun visor or the bill of a giveaway hat from a prior event. It’s an existence of dusty gravel roads, shoddy carnival rides, marginally talented boy bands, and state fair-ish sibling gospel groups. Judges grow to expect the crunchy sound of public-address systems, bad weather, tummy aches, and screaming babies.

And they love it.

Committed barbecue judges live lives of comfortable shoes and farmer tans, Rolaids and palate cleansers. Different towns, different events, sometimes (though not usually) even different teams. Judges move from one weekend to the next, from contest to contest. And this weekend they’re here in Memphis for the “Superbowl of Swine,” the biggest event of them all — the Memphis in May World Championship Barbecue Cooking Contest.

Bar-B-Crazy

They’ve gathered here in Tom Lee Park, over 500 judges and 236 teams, drawn like polar-opposite magnets. On Wednesday, the teams started setting up their tents and assembling their gear. They’ve come from all over Z–e nation. Using word-of-mouth, mailer updates, and a plethora of Web sites to learn of upcoming competitions, they pack up and go — embarking on the never-ending quest for a more perfect rub, a tangier sauce, and meat that will pull — but not shake — off the bone. Despite all the beer and late-T–ght parties, the teams know this is serious business.

Even the teams’ tents are impressive. Ranging from ramshackle afterthoughts to elaborate, two-story, lattice-trimmed and wrought-iron-fenced mini-homes, the tents will be the primary residences for many of the team members for the next four days. Come Sunday, they’ll tear everything down, pack it up, and start planning for the next event. But make no mistake, this one is the biggie, truly the Superbowl of Swine — the largest pork barbecue contest in the world and a testament to all the good a hog can do.

“Barbecue fest is one of the best weeks to be in Memphis,” says Dan Fain, a motorcycle cop by day and a 20-year veteran judge for the event. “Everyone comes together to eat, drink, and have a good time.”

On Wednesday night the park is open only to team members, but on Thursday non-cooking friends can come in, and that’s when the party really begins. It’s not uncommon for 200 people to be in a single tent at a time, and some of the barbecue teams don’t even enter the contest. Rather, some of these “patio teams” just pull low-budget grills out of their garages and drag them riverside so they can be a part of the party. (There is a whole category just for patio teams, though.) There’s live music, experimental barbecue, and beer — lots and lots of beer. Team members feed their friends, listen to Southern rock, and enjoy the last few days of pleasant spring weather before Memphis morphs into the outdoor sauna of summer.

It’s said that the Thursday night party tradition began because at least one person would have to stay up all night to watch the meat. Now, some 24 years after the barbecue festival began, Thursday night is a second- and third-winded college party, a chance to stay in the park until 4 a.m., drinking and carousing with several thousand strangers who will soon feel like close friends.

By Friday night, the event is in full swing, but for the teams it’s time to get serious. While Thursday was an all-night keg party, Friday is crunch time. Judging begins Saturday morning, and these teams don’t spend an average of $2,000 per contest — even more for Memphis’ big-league event — to lose.

To many Memphians, the barbecue fest is Memphis in May. Forget the adolescent-patchouli-street-mosh of Music Fest; barbecue fest is the pinnacle of the month. But if you don’t know the right people — that is, people on a barbecue team — it can be no fun at all.

And at times, it’s no fun for the judges. They must adhere to somewhat Draconian rules.

“Q”-ing Up To Judge

“The teams want to see your eyes,” an event organizer tells the judges at their organizing briefing. “So take off your sunglasses when you go in their tent. You all know the rules: no guests, no cameras, no briefcases, no smoking, no cell phones, no beepers, and no alcohol. Alcohol will kill your taste buds and your attention span. Most of the complaints we get from teams is that one of their judges was drunk.”

Under the massive tent, this disjointed fraternity of like-minded souls gathers like flies at a Fourth of July picnic, swarming and buzzing morning greetings to each other. They help themselves to doughnuts and too-hot coffee with no apparent concern that a jelly-filled or chocolate-glazed breakfast might seem like a bad idea when that last plate piled high with steaming shoulder is set before them in a few hours. They’re a mixed bag, these judges, and though Monday through Friday their lives are very different, this Saturday they are united in their passion for perfect barbecue.

“I usually fast the night before judging a contest,” says Fain. “If you don’t eat a lot when you’re judging, the teams think you don’t like their food.”

Not surprisingly, most (though not Fain) seem to be carrying about 40 extra pounds, and a disproportionate number are wearing T-shirts that bear the images of various cartoon pigs. These people don’t just eat pork, they live it.

At the briefing the judges are instructed to go over the list of teams they’ll be judging to look for potential conflicts of interest.

“Conflicts are not if you partied with the team last night,” the judges are instructed, “but if a team member fired you last week. Then you’d have a conflict. Also, if a team offers you a gift, you can’t accept it until after the contest.”

Most of the judges are white, most are over 40. There’s a pretty fair mix of both sexes, and all — absolutely all of them — love barbecue with a zeal normally reserved for religious deities. Even so, compared to the zeal shown by the teams they judge, the judges seem positively lukewarm.

For the “On-Site” judging competition, where the judges see the grills and score the teams on presentation, the competitors pull out all the stops. The judges can expect royal treatment. Some teams will bring in window-unit air conditioners just to cool them off. They often will be invited to sit at tables covered in white linens and set with fine china. Some teams even hire professional servers who will offer the judges a choice of wines to accompany their barbecue, though the judges are instructed to shun alcohol while judging.

Each judge arrives at each tent with an “ambassador,” another volunteer who will time the judge to ensure that 12 to 15 minutes are spent in each tent. The ambassadors usually won’t go in with the judge, and, sticklers that they are, many go out of their way to avoid influencing the judges.

“If Ann [a judge] had even asked me to hold her clipboard or something so that she could finish filling out her form, I’d have to tell her, No, because it could appear that I was trying to influence her,” says Mike Case, an ambassador. (Case used to be a judge until his doctor recommended that he quit eating pork due to health problems.)

The head cook will give a separate presentation to each of the three on-site judges. He’ll (head cooks are almost exclusively male) tell them about his grill, charcoal, rubs, cuts of meat, cooking times, and sauce. He’ll show them the meat still on the grill, typically surrounded by garnish so colorful it looks like a salad bar. Other team members, usually in matching outfits, will hang back, sometimes staying completely out of sight.

“It’s fun to listen to their spiels,” says Fain, “because none of it has to be true and these people are real enthusiastic. One year, I judged 25 contests — that’s a lot of road trips. Some of the judges are retired or are teachers who don’t have to work in the summertime — they’re almost professional.”

But judging 25 events in a year is hardly typical. Most judges will go to five to 10 contests a year. However, many of the teams will compete in 25. Twenty-five weekends a year means that these team members devote roughly four of every 10 days to barbecue. And, with the big, corporate-sponsored teams, it’s a safe bet that the head cook will spend even his days off experimenting with rubs, sauces, temperatures, and cooking times. For some, barbecue actually is their full-time, year-round job. Contests take place throughout the year, and in some places you’ll see the cookers spitting out smoke while surrounded by snow.

The teams’ rigs are equally staggering. One competing team has a simple grill made from a converted Memphis Light, Gas and Water oil pipe; another has a $300,000 mobile cooking unit the size of an efficiency apartment. But the amount of money spent on the equipment tends to have no effect on the taste of the meat. Besides, no matter how much gear they have, they haul it all from contest to contest, and when there’s no contest to go to, they take their rigs to auto races and tailgate parties. In their customized RVs, towing elaborate cooking rigs from fairground to fairground, the teams live a vagrant life of chemical toilets, keg beer, and 10-years-since-their-last-hit bands. And they wouldn’t have it any other way.

With the teams taking “Q” so seriously, it can only be expected that the judges would be equally somber (and sober) during the judging itself. For the privilege of judging the Memphis in May World Championship the judges actually have to pay, plus they have to have graduated from “Barbecue School” and must have already judged three smaller events before they are considered worthy of tackling the Superbowl of Swine.

Getting Schooled

“Barbecue School” is a one-day seminar on all things pork. Participants are given an anatomy course on pigs: Each cut of meat is laboriously explained, each bone dissected, each classification detailed. They are taught the difference between Spare Ribs, St. Louis-style Ribs, Loin (Baby Back) Ribs, and Country-style Ribs. And that’s just the rib-grouping.

The judges are taught how to evaluate each team’s entry using six criteria: Area and Personal Appearance of the team; Presentation of the Entry; Appearance of the Entry; the Tenderness of the Entry; Flavor of the Entry; and the judge’s Overall Impression of the entry. Likewise, the team gets to score the judge’s knowledge, attentiveness, and time spent with them. Each judge must write their Social Security number on their judging ballot and on the ballot the team completes. All of the judges’ scores are tallied and recorded. Using specially created software, MIM officials log every score and use the Social Security numbers to track an individual judge’s record. If a judge is thought to be “playing God” by scoring one team really high and scoring all the others really low, it’s likely that judge won’t be invited back.

“Blind Judging” — judging several numbered entries without knowing which teams prepared them — influences a team’s score more than on-site judging does. The judges know this and take their blind-judging duties even more seriously. No one speaks during blind-judging, and any who do are apt to be shushed. The judges are given paper plates divided into several pie-shaped sections. Each team’s entry is placed in a different section and judged using the aforementioned categories. If an entry is served with a sauce or rub, the entry is judged as a whole. No additional points are awarded for serving a sauce or rub.

According to one judge, “If they give you a rub and a sauce then you judge the rub alone, then the rub with the meat, then the meat with the sauce, then just the sauce, then just the meat, then the sauce, the rub, and meat all together.”

Judges for the final round have it the best, or the worst, depending on how full they are. These four judges must sample each of the nine finalists: three in the shoulder competition, three in ribs, three in whole hog. They travel from tent to tent by golf cart on Saturday afternoon and have the final word on which teams produce the best barbecued pork in the world.

Of all the barbecue contests sanctioned nationwide by the Memphis in May organization, the one in the Bluff City is the only one where the judges have to pay. But the $30 fee is pretty reasonable considering they’ll be munching on the world’s best barbecue. With all the time, effort, grade of meat, spices, and sauces the teams put into their product, a single rack of these contest-caliber ribs would cost upwards of $50 in a restaurant.

Besides, the $30 buys an invite to the judges’ dinner and it gets them an apron, and in barbecue circles aprons equal credibility. The teams and the judges like to brag about how many aprons they have and from which festivals. Aprons are what separate the amateurs from the pros, and for some of the judges, the apron alone is worth $30.

Likewise, a stroll down “Rib Row” at Memphis’ event illustrates that for the teams aprons are more than just silk-screened cloths. They are trophies — proof that they came, sweated, and sometimes even conquered.

Tom Jenkins, the organizer of Lakeland’s Fun Fest and a veteran Memphis in May-sanctioned judge, says that when he first began his Lakeland festival 21 years ago, the primary draw was a 10K “Fun Run.”

“But runners don’t drink,” Jenkins says, laughing. “Runners don’t eat the Pronto Pups, and they don’t party. They just run and then they leave. We wanted to find something that would draw and keep the crowd and get everyone partying, so we brought in barbecue.”

Now with other sanctioning groups springing up all over the country to compete with Memphis in May, people everywhere are coming to Jenkins’ realization. There are now sanctioning groups based in Kansas City, Seattle, Texas, and Boston. And each of these regions boasts its own unique events. In Boston, they grill shellfish. In Kansas City, they judge chicken, beef, and pork. And in Texas — you guessed it — it’s beef. Even here in Memphis, the proverbial sow of all contests, teams can be judged in the “Everything But” category. This often includes exotic meats like ostrich, emu, or as Fain recalls from one year, “a perfectly cooked road-kill possum that no one would eat but everyone agreed should win — and it did.”

Still, despite the competition from other competitions, the Memphis in May trophy is still the most coveted. You might keep that in mind this year when you’re walking down Rib Row drinking keg beer courtesy of one team and eating ribs from another. Know that there are people there charged with picking a winner. It’s a messy, messy job — but somebody’s got to do it.

Naming Names

Some people can’t leave it at putting a pig on the grill. Long before the first flank sizzles, some participants get busy cooking up an outrageous team name. Some of those names are listed below (in alphabetical order). Please note the ingenious use of the double meaning of “pork.” Subtly delicious! — RG

Adribbers

Any Pork in a Storm

Backseat Porkers

Barefoot in the Pork

Betchurazz Barbeque

The Beverly Pigbillies

Cherry Porkers

Eighteen Squealers

Eller Swign’s Natural Born Grillers

Highway Ribbery

M.E.M.P.H.I.S.

(Makin’ Easy Money

Pimpin Hogs In Style)

Notorious P.I.G.

P-Funk and the Fat Back Allstars

Pigs in Zen

Pigs-O-War

The Pit & Pigulum II

Pork Authority

Pork Crastinators

Pork Fiction

Pork Me Tender

Pork, Sweat & Beers

Snoop Hoggy Hog

South Pork

Squealer Dealers

Sweet Swine O’ Mine

Swinefeld

The Ten That Grilled Elvis

Transporkers

Uniporkers

Wolves in Pig’s Clothing

You Be the Judge

Memphis in May offers several barbecue judging seminars (BBQ School) each year. For more information on Memphis in May-sanctioned events and to learn how to become a judge yourself, go to the Memphis in May Web site, www.memphisinmay.org, or call Pam Hetsel at (901) 525-4611.

RG

KNOW YOUR MEAT

Definitions used in Memphis in May-sanctioned events:

Whole Hog — an entire hog, whose dressed weight is 85 pounds or more prior to the removal of the head, feet, and skin, which must be cooked as one unit on one grill surface. No portion or portions of the whole hog may be separated prior to or during the cooking process.

Shoulder — the portion containing the arm bone, shank bone, and a portion of the blade bone. The pork ham, considered a shoulder entry, contains the hind-leg bone. Boston butts or picnic shoulders are not valid entries.

Ribs — that portion containing the ribs and further classified as a spare rib or a loin-rib portion. Country-style ribs are not a valid entry. See below.

Spare Ribs — the rib section from the belly, with or without the brisket.

St. Louis-style Ribs — spare ribs with brisket and skirt meat removed.

Loin Ribs (Baby Back Ribs) — prepared from blade and center sections of the loin.

Country-style Ribs — prepared from the blade end of the loin. — RG

Categories
Cover Feature News

Me and Bill and Hillary

Hickman Ewing does a pretty dead-on impression of Bill Clinton. But
then he’s had more practice than most people.

One of the highlights of Ewing’s six-year tenure with the Office
of the Independent Counsel was playing Clinton in moot court on three
occasions. With his Southern drawl, rambling speaking style, and Memphis
roots, the former federal prosecutor was an easy choice for Ken Starr and his
staff.

When the lawyers in moot court asked their polite questions about
Monica Lewinsky, Ewing as Clinton hemmed and hawed and filibustered so well
that the prosecutors eventually sharpened their questions enough to elicit the
famous sordid details of the Lewinsky affair that led to Clinton’s
impeachment.

That was Ewing’s singular footnote to history but only one of
several important contributions he made to the Whitewater investigation. He
interviewed Bill and Hillary Clinton several times at the White House and ran
the Arkansas phase of Whitewater that convicted Webster Hubbell, Jim and Susan
McDougal, and former governor Jim Guy Tucker.

Ewing talked at length with the Flyer at his Germantown
home (and for the first time in the Memphis media) about the Clintons,
Lewinsky, the McDougals, Starr, and Linda Tripp.

In his study there are pictures of his father, a legendary high
school football coach, as well as Ken Starr and various politicians, including
Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, Howard Baker, and, yes, Bill Clinton. The
Clinton picture, he is quick to point out, was a gag gift, while the Nixon and
Johnson shots are there because they are standing alongside a member of his
wife’s family.

The bookcase is full of religious books. Ewing is a lay minister,
and opponents occasionally accused him of religious zealotry during trials.
There is one full shelf of books about Whitewater and the Clintons, including
three of Ewing’s personal favorites — First in His Class by David
Maraniss, Blood Sport by James Stewart, and The Truth at Any
Cost
by Susan Schmidt and Michael Wiesskopf — and several others he
considers biased from either the left or the right.

Ewing is mentioned in most of them, often at length. He has also
been profiled in a front-page story in The Wall Street Journal, dubbed
“slowpoke prosecutor administering water torture” by columnist
William Safire of The New York Times, picked (incorrectly) as Starr’s
successor by Newsweek, and called “Clinton’s Other Pursuer”
in a long article in The New Yorker by Jeffrey Toobin. His picture
graced the front page of The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette when he was one
of five speakers to eulogize Jim McDougal. The stocky, white-haired Ewing was
also seen on network television several times, walking grimly along at Starr’s
side or uttering a clipped “no comment.”

This was a case of the rest of the country coming to know a man
that Memphians have known quite well since Ewing was a star athlete at
Whitehaven High School in the 1960s. After graduating from Vanderbilt and
serving in the Navy, Ewing came back to Memphis and made his mark as the
prosecutor who convicted Ray Blanton, Dana Kirk, and Rickey Peete, and
unsuccessfully prosecuted Harold Ford Sr. He had just finished playing himself
as prosecutor in a television mock trial of James Earl Ray when he was hired
by the Office of the Independent Counsel in 1994. Curiously, although he was
something of a star in the Republican-controlled Justice Department in the
Eighties, he had been to the White House only twice before 1995 and never met
a U.S. president until he met Clinton.

Ewing’s enforced silence for much of the last seven years was
somewhat unusual for him. He was always good for a quote or two outside the
courthouse during his Memphis trials, and he tells a story in a rambling,
colloquial style that left no doubt that anyone but him would play Bill
Clinton in the OIC’s moot court.

He has another notable attribute, as his adversaries can
attest.

“I remember stuff,” he drawls.

In fact that could be his epitaph. He has a remarkable memory for
sports, local trivia, history, and especially legal matters, which served him
well as a prosecutor. He has no plans, however, to write his own Whitewater
book. At 59, he is taking it easy, unsure when or how he will resume his law
practice, and reliving his childhood. He plans to compete in the Senior
Olympics, where he has previously won as many as five events, including the
50-meter dash, baseball throw, 400-meter walk, and even the Scrabble
event.

Following are excerpts of his comments about the famous people he
met and the events he helped shape over the last six years.

The Whitewater Investigation

Whitewater is a real misnomer. The real investigation is called
“In Re Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan.” Did [the Clintons] commit
any crimes in the 1982 to 1986 period? We didn’t have sufficient evidence to
prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they committed crimes. A much more
serious question related to whether there was obstruction of justice and
perjury relative to the investigation. That was a much closer question. Let me
give the Clintons the benefit of the doubt. Jim and Susan McDougal controlled
two banks. The question is: Did the Clintons have guilty knowledge? They
certainly had knowledge of some of the transactions, but I’d say it was
questionable whether they had criminal intent.

April 22, 1995: First Meeting With the Clintons

At the White House

Bob Fiske, the independent counsel before Ken Starr, was doing a
great job. Bob had already subpoenaed records from the Clintons. It wasn’t
like Ken made up a new game plan. He adopted a game plan from Fiske, which he
inherited from the Justice Department. We were the fourth prosecutor on the
investigation. So we had a number of different subjects to ask about. My part
was primarily about Mrs. Clinton’s work at the Rose Law Firm. There was an
allegation by James McDougal that he gave business to Hillary at the behest of
the Clintons.

We had two hours with the president and two hours with the first
lady. It was four days after the Oklahoma City bombing. The lawyers for
Clinton were telling us, “You have two hours with the president because
he is really busy. He has got to make a speech. He just met with some kids
from Oklahoma City.” It was a pretty somber occasion. Clinton is very
personable. He comes in and shakes everybody’s hand. He gave us a little tour
of the Treaty Room. Then he leaves and after 15 minutes she comes in. I am the
main questioner on her. After 10 minutes, there is a knock on the door. A Navy
steward’s mate comes in and says something I couldn’t hear. Mrs. Clinton
doesn’t look very happy. In my opinion she looks perturbed at the situation.
The guy walks over to the closet and comes out carrying the president’s golf
clubs. It turned out he was playing golf that afternoon. It was almost like,
“Bill, we’re trying to be serious here and give them two hours each, and
now they know you’re going out to play golf.” It was kind of
humorous.

The Clintons

He is a master of the “aw shucks” personality. He
claimed to have a better memory than [Hillary]. And I will say that the
subject matter I was asking him about wasn’t that critical to him. Although he
answered one question in a way that he said he didn’t recall, and I thought he
probably did recall. My impression when I got through that day was they’re
not telling us exactly like it is.

Hillary was, in my opinion, more reserved, maybe a little
friendlier than she’s painted to be. I think they’re both very professional,
but I found over this investigation, when you’re dealing with really high-
powered lawyers, they tell their clients not to volunteer anything. I don’t
say I wouldn’t give somebody the same advice — “Answer the question,
don’t start rambling.” And some lawyers will tell their clients that if
they aren’t 100 percent sure to just say they don’t remember. In my opinion,
their claims of “I don’t remember” on certain things were very
dubious. I didn’t fully appreciate it the first time. Let’s put it this way. I
wasn’t satisfied they told everything exactly straight. As time went on some
of the answers they gave [in that interview] were some of the most
troubling.

Centipedes and Elvis

The second time we were at the White House was July 22, 1995. As
soon as the president comes in he shakes everybody’s hand, calls everyone by
name. The court reporter took about five minutes to set up, so he’s just
talking. And he’s talking about Elvis. How Elvis was his favorite singer
growing up. Then he points to his lawyer, David Kendall, and says, “Who
is yours?” And Kendall says Little Richard. Then he’s talking about
critters: “I remember cutting grass in Hot Springs, we had black widow
spiders; we had brown recluse spiders and snakes; we even used to get
centipedes and break ’em in half and watch ’em go in different directions.
Y’all probably did that too.” And he looks around and nobody’s looking at
him and they’re thinking, What are you talking about? I’m kind of standing
across the table and he says, “Well, Hick, I bet y’all used to do that in
Memphis, didn’t you?” I said, “No, Mr. President, we didn’t do that
in Memphis.”

Jim and Susan McDougal

I dealt with Jim at length after he was convicted. If everything
Jim said was true, then the Clintons violated the law in several respects.
Obviously you don’t take the word of a convicted felon who’s got problems
unless there is lots of documentation and paperwork to back it up. So we tried
to find paperwork and chase out leads. We found some, but we had not reached a
final decision on both Clintons at the time of his death. So it hurt us in a
way, but you couldn’t charge either one of them based on just Jim
McDougal.

Susan said on Geraldo one night that I murdered her
husband. [She said] Jim McDougal was in federal prison and the only one he
would talk to was Hickman Ewing. And he had called Mr. Ewing and said ‘You
need to help me because they’re not giving me my medicine,’ and Ewing said, ‘I
don’t care,’ and he died that night.

And of course that is a total lie. I’m really at that point the
closest person to Jim McDougal that there is. I spent a lot of time with Jim,
and I’d say most of his friends had deserted him. When he went to prison, I
was really his contact with the outside world. Not only was he a valuable
witness for us but, you know, you develop a relationship. I had been down to
Texas to see him in prison about 10 days before he died. I had just written a
lengthy letter to the Parole Commission on his behalf. So when he dies, I get
the call and I’m just sick. So when Susan says he was calling me, saying,
They’re not giving me my medicine. I don’t know where she gets that, but it’s
just not true.

Kenneth Starr

Part of Ken’s problem toward the end was he had such negative
ratings because he was being demonized. They — and I mean the Clintons, James
Carville, Sidney Blumenthal, Geraldo — did a very good job of spinning things
to demonize Ken Starr. They had a lot invested in that. I think they probably
had a lot invested in me too.

Starr is a prince of a guy. He reminds me in ways of Mike Cody.
Ideologically they are from different briar patches, if you will, but I know
Mike actually met with Ken when he was considering hiring me. Ken is one of
the most personable guys you will ever meet — a gentleman, brilliant guy,
smartest guy I’ve ever met as far as intellect and law. I’ve always said that
when you’re investigating someone who holds political office, if you don’t
have the law, you argue the facts. If you don’t have the facts, you argue the
law. And if you don’t have the law or the facts you attack the prosecutor. I
told Ken, The people that are attacking us, that gives you a clue that maybe
they don’t have the law or the facts. I told Ken I had been through this many
times with Rickey Peete, Harold Ford, Dana Kirk, Governor Blanton. But it was
difficult for him.

Monica Lewinsky

That’s what’s ironic about this whole Lewinsky thing. We’re down
here doing a white-collar crime and corruption investigation and we had a
number of delays because of privilege claims that were not meritorious. If
Susan McDougal had come in in September 1996 and answered all the questions,
we would have made decisions on the president and first lady some time in 1997
and we’d have been through. We wouldn’t have even been working on this when
the Monica stuff came up.

The Linda Tripp Tapes

We were trying to decide where the appropriate place was to
charge Webb Hubbell. Ken tells me to come into his office. So we go in his
office and we get on a conference call with Jackie Bennett and that is the
first I hear about it. I didn’t even know [Monica Lewinsky’s] name. Tripp
tapes Lewinsky that day. They send the tapes to Little Rock to be transcribed.
They hand-deliver them. FBI agents brought them down. So the next day my
personal secretary and another secretary transcribe that 4-hour tape. Of
course my secretary is typing this and she’s got on earphones and she says,
You won’t believe this stuff! This girl’s mother ought to be shot! Because
Monica says, “Well, Linda says, I can’t go in there and lie because I’m
under oath, and I’ve taken an oath before God.” Then Monica says,
“Well, you know, God is good, and God doesn’t want anybody to be hurt,
and so if [telling the truth] would hurt anybody then you’re not supposed to
tell the truth.” And my secretary is saying, Can you believe this
stuff?

Did Monica “Save” Hillary?

Our grand jury in Little Rock was going to end in May. So the
next morning after we transcribe the tape, Bob Bittman of our office has come
to Little Rock to help me get to the finish line in making the final decision
on the president and first lady. When that transcript of Linda Tripp’s tape is
finished, Bob goes to Washington and never comes back. As I like to say in
biblical terms, Bob got raptured. Instead of us having 10 people, we are down
to about six. I’ve said this facetiously to some extent, Monica saved
Hillary.

The Blue Dress

I’m there the day they bring the blue dress in. You can see the
spot on there. You don’t know for sure it’s semen, but it could be. You talk
about keeping something under wraps. Well, we sent it to the lab. I didn’t
know the results when we did the moot court. Then the morning our people went
over to question Clinton, Ken called Jackie Bennet, Sol Wisenberg, and me and
says, “Bob [Bittman] and I are the only ones who know this. Two weeks ago
the FBI reported to Bob in our office that in fact it was semen.” So Bob
called David Kendall and says we want to take the president’s blood sample.
Kendall says, “You said you wouldn’t do that unless you have some basis
to believe.” And Bob says, “We’ve got some basis to believe.”
Bob and a female FBI agent go to the White House. They call the president out
of a dinner party and Bob tells me Clinton was red in the face and so mad
because he has got to give his blood sample. Look — he knows. He
knows.

Playing Bill Clinton

In Moot Court

The first time, we had about 30 people in the room and Bob
Bittman is asking questions like, “Mr. President, did you ever touch
Monica Lewinsky?” And I say, “Well, Mr. Bittman, down South we hug
people; we hug people at weddings and funerals. That’s just cultural where I
come from. I hug lots of people. That doesn’t mean anything.” It takes me
about four minutes to answer the question. Then he asks, “Did you give
her any gifts?” And I say, “Mr. Bittman, we give hundreds of gifts
at the White House. Growing up, we used to keep extra gifts on the washing
machine in the kitchen, and if somebody came by and brought us a gift then
we’d have a gift to give them. Did I give her a gift? Yeah, I could have, but
I don’t remember.” We finally get through and a couple of young lawyers
watching us say, “Man, you’re better than the president.” Of course,
I said, “No, I’m not.”

By the next time, we had talked to Monica. I was up there
studying this stuff. It was very interesting going through it. I had
constructed this long chronology of the main events and facts. So I go in and
add the main Lewinsky events to my chronology. It was to me quite significant
that she detailed nine incidents where they actually did something. And about
seven or eight of them, there was some significant event going on in the other
part of the investigation. For example, the billing records [for the Rose law
firm] are, quote, “discovered” at the White House and produced for
us on January 5th, 1996. The next day the media goes crazy. And the next day,
the seventh, she comes over and they go back in the hallway and do their
thing. And they hadn’t done this in a while. Two weeks later on the 21st, a
Sunday, the lawyers for the Clintons are meeting in our office and I’m on the
speaker phone from Memphis. They’re asking our people, “Please don’t make
Mrs. Clinton come to the grand jury. This will be bad,” and so forth. At
the exact same time Monica and Clinton are in the hallway at the White House.
The nine times when she said she performed oral sex on him, something’s going
on. I mean, the day before David Hale testifies. I mean, I’m not saying when
you get under stress that’s an excuse, but with just about every one of those
[incidents], something is happening.

In the second moot court, Paul Rosenzweig, who’s on our staff, is
playing the part of David Kendall, Clinton’s lawyer. So he and I are kind of
off by ourselves. And everybody else in the whole office is trying to get
prepared. So when they go through and do this four-hour thing, clearly it’s
like I’m getting the best of them. And I’m running out the clock, too. I’m
going into the four-corner offense.

The guys who are reviewing this say, “You need to get more
aggressive, you need to not let him ramble. You need to do that with respect,
but you need to sharpen the questions. You spent too much time asking him
about the ties that Monica gave him.” They actually show me an Internet
picture of Clinton and the tie, and they say, “That’s the tie she gave
you, isn’t it?” And I say, “Well, you know, y’all may be trying to
make something out of it but I’ve got about four ties like that, and in fact
Hillary gave me a tie like that, and that’s one of my favorites because I love
my wife.”

It made our guys have to go back and sharpen up their questions.
You can’t let him filibuster like that. It’s kind of like a football game.
You’re scouting the other team’s best player. The first time I’m denying. The
third time, though, they’re getting very precise. And I say, “Wait a
minute. Let me tell you something. They didn’t ask me in the civil deposition,
‘Did Monica Lewinsky perform oral sex on you?’ If they had, I’d have had to
say yes because I wasn’t gonna lie. But they didn’t ask me that.” And I
also said I wasn’t going to go into the details because it was too
embarrassing to my wife and daughter and I love them and so forth.

So what he in fact did, as everybody knows now, he reads a
statement at the start of the deposition and says he had an inappropriate
relationship but he was not going to go into the details.

Leaving the Office Of the Independent Counsel

The judges asked if I would stay to the end. I said, no, don’t
appoint me. The end meant reports, and unlike a regular prosecutor where you
either indict or you don’t, you have to do this detailed report with
footnotes, notify everybody who is named, give them an opportunity to look at
it and comment. Then it’s up to the special division whether they want to make
it public. We had about 4,000 boxes of records, including 2,500 boxes in
Little Rock. I had gone on in September of 1994. When they asked in September
of 1999 if I could stay on until the end, I said, no, I just couldn’t do it.
I’d had my fun.

You can e-mail John Branston at branston@memphismagazine.com.