Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

FROM MY SEAT

ROUNDBALL RESET

With the NBA All-Star break behind us, it’s time for some mid-season musings on Pau, Yao, the Mavs, the Cavs, and what’s in store for the season’s second half and beyond.

  • The Grizzlies are a fun team to watch. They’re still bad, folks, but they’re young, versatile, and genuinely exciting. The addition of Drew Gooden, Gordan Giricek, and Wesley Person has transformed a plodding, predictable team with maybe three scoring options to a club that might be led in the scoring column by any of seven different players. Pau Gasol is the real deal and will serve as the measuring stick for how close the Griz are getting to playoff contention. He’s a classic “second star.” Think about what Boston’s Kevin McHale was to Larry Bird. Or L.A.’s James Worthy to Magic Johnson. More recently, how about San Antonio’s David Robinson to the brilliant Tim Duncan? When the Grizzlies find a player who will shift Gasol into a supporting role Ñ and as long as Gasol accepts such a transition Ñ Jerry West’s creation will be on its way to May basketball. Where do you find such a gem? That’s why Mr. Logo is a Memphian.

  • The fans have “spoken” . . . and should be ignored. Yao Ming an All-Star starter ahead of, ahem, Shaq Daddy? Come on, people. With all due respect to the biggie-sized story that is Yao, and with a tip of the cap to the Chinese fans who took advantage of on-line voting, this was an atrocity and made the over-hyped exhibition game that much more of a joke. I was as stoked as the next guy to see the 7’5” Rocket slap O’Neal field goal attempts hither and yon in the first Houston Laker game of the season. It’s hope for the future, to say the least. So let Yao start an All-Star game . . . in the future. Shaquille O’Neal remains this generation’s most significant force in the NBA. And he shouldn’t sit behind anyone.

    My proposal? Turn the All-Star selection process on its head. Instead of letting fans choose the starters (with head coaches filling the roster), allow fans to pick all twelve players for each conference. Sure, it’s a popularity contest. So what? (You might allow a single “wild card” selection for a diamond-in-the-rough on each team.) Once the roster is established, allow the coach to name his own starters. Give the honor some credibility.

  • Speaking of diamonds in the rough, when do you think we’ll next see a nationally televised Cleveland Cavalier game? What an awful collection of rim-denters surrounding rookie Dajuan Wagner. I’ve been excited to see the undersized Wagner’s scoring acumen prove as dynamic on the NBA hardcourt as it was at the University of Memphis. I’m just afraid his game will remain one-dimensional as long as he’s stuck in the latest incarnation of the “mistake by the lake.”

  • The Dallas Mavericks will not win the NBA title. Or even reach the Finals, for that matter. So long the league’s laughingstock, Dallas may be the most fun team to watch since Jordan’s Bulls. That is, when they’re playing their game and against the right competition (read: not the Kings, Lakers, or Spurs). They pass, they run, they score, they even block shots (a frontcourt of Shawn Bradley, Raef LaFrentz, and Dirk Nowitzki is more than 21 feet of swat). But the Mavericks continue to lack a toughness, a grit, a fire that every NBA champion has had. They blew a 27-point lead in the fourth quarter(!) against the Lakers. Portland beat them up inside in erasing a 12-point halftime lead on Super Bowl Sunday. They may win 65 games, but . . .

  • If they can get healthy by April, the Sacramento Kings will be your 2003 NBA champs. I’m convinced the Lakers will rise, and may even edge San Antonio for a spot in the Western Conference finals (the de facto championship series, based on the Eastern Conference’s vast inferiority). But Sacramento is so good that their second unit would make the playoffs (and might just win the East!). Most importantly, Chris Webber has turned himself into an unselfish player. The Kings start a unit of five players every bit as willing to pass the ball as shoot. Their backup point guard Ñ Bobby Jackson Ñ would start for about 20 other clubs. They have a center in Vlade Divac who doesn’t know he’s outmanned by O’Neal or Duncan. And that’s important come June. Webber is the requisite superstar . . . he’ll be your Finals MVP.

  • My mid-season All-NBA team: Jason Kidd (New Jersey) and Paul Pierce (Boston) at guard, Tracy McGrady (Orlando) and Kevin Garnett (Minnesota) at forward, and Duncan in the middle.

  • Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    KRAUTROCK, BITTE?

    Morvern Callar

    Various Artists

    (Warp)

    Well, what do you know? It’s our old friend, the soundtrack as aesthetic defining point and semi-pop marketing device. In the case of the disc accompanying director Lynne Ramsay’s acclaimed Morvern Callar, there’s something of a twist to the usual soundtrack CPR: The disc serves to reposition Can, the early-’70s German prog-rock group, as a pop band. By including Can’s two most immediately memorable songs (1972’s “Spoon” and 1976’s “I Want More,” the latter an actual hit record in England) and two similarly hooky cuts by bassist/producer Holger Czukay (“Cool in the Pool” and “Fragrance”), it offers Krautrock at its friendliest. For record geeks who’ve been attempting to foist this stuff on people for years, it’ll serve as a godsend.

    It’s helped along by a bunch of other hipster-friendly selections. As befits a Warp records release, there’s plenty of that Sheffield label’s avant-electronica, with smart selections from Aphex Twin, Boards of Canada, and Broadcast. We also get a welcome edit of Stereolab’s endless “Blue Milk,” some dub from Lee Perry, some gamelan, and a pair of country parodies, one good (Ween), one stupid (Nancy Sinatra and Lee Hazlewood). But considering what mishmashes soundtracks tend to be, one that keeps its focus as straight as this one is a blessing, even when it stumbles.

    Grade: A-

    Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    POLITICS

    NO DEAL

    Momentous things occurred during the committee meetings held Wednesday by the Shelby County Commission — notably a vote to rescind the litigation fees recently ruled unconstitutional by the state Attorney General — but one of the potentially most dramatic events had a life-span of only a minute or two.

    That was when Commission chairman Walter Bailey, making a late entry into a mid-morning meeting of an ad hoc staff-reorganization committee chaired by Joe Ford, pulled the pin on a grenade from a box his mates thought had been tucked away after the traumatic Calvin Williams episode, then carefully replaced the pin when there was general alarm.

    The commissioners had been engaging in an extended and somewhat desultory colloquy over such issues as: (a) whether acting commission administrator Grace Hutchinson should be permanently so employed or whether there should be an open search for the job; (b) how many staff members there should be and what their pay and functions should be. The discussion — based on some thoughtful recommendations by Ford, a veteran of a similar reorganization as a city council member a decade ago — was necessitated by the resignation under pressure last month of former commission administrator Williams.

    Williams, it will be remembered, had been the subject of some blaring publicity about — inter alia — conflicts of interest concerning his temporary employment agency, his browbeating of County Assessor Rita Clark, and his reported involvement as a middle-man in paying off a female employee of the Juvenile Clerk’s office who had a sexual harassment case against Williams’ pal Darrell Catron.

    Catron, now apparently a cooperative witness in a case against others involved in dubious county transactions, had numerous other legal problems. Williams’ problems, too, had been mounting to the point that he had to go. Hutchinson, his deputy and a long-term county employee of impeccable reputation and nose-to-the-grindstone reputation, succeeded him on an interim basis.

    One of the points that had not been debated at the point that Bailey entered the committee room and took his seat was the revised nature of the administrator’s duties. Williams had been a wheeler-dealer and broker on the grand scale; not only did he cut his own deals, he helped various commissioners cut theirs. Hutchinson is much more the civil-servant type, at the opposite end of the job description, and the discussion ante Bailey had assumed that kind of profile for the position.

    That’s when Bailey pulled his pin. Let’s face it, he reminded his mates, “we’re all politicians.” Accordingly, the commission administrator should be gifted at politics, too, a “political person” able to “help us out” when bargains needed to be struck and impasses unblocked, or when a consensus needed to be reached. Therefore, there should be two chief administrative positions — one, charged with budgetary and general administrative backup, to be held by Hutchinson or someone like her and another for — a broker type.

    There was, it is fair to say, general consternation at this, and there were no takers — or none, in any case, willing to publicly second Bailey’s remarks. The chairman had not alluded to Williams, other than to note that his own potential vote against retaining him had been based on the deposed administrator’s ultimate inability, under fire, to be a “consensus” maker. But Bailey seemed to have had the Williams mold in mind.

    Speaking of “consensus,” Michael Hooks spoke for what was clearly one Wednesday morning. “We should never ever get a person as ‘political’ as our last administrator,” he said. And, as far as simple consensus-building was concerned, the low-key, unobtrusive Hutchinson “has proved her political savvy…but — he underlined the point — “she’s not a 14th commissioner.” Moreover, Hooks noted realistically, “We would never be able to decide on another Ôpolitical’ person.”

    The amens around the table were a crescendo. With that, Bailey withdrew his proposal as quickly as he’d introduced it and conceded the point. That had to be bad news for the experienced political types — among them, former city council members Kenneth Whalum Sr. and Jerome Rubin and veteran pol Joe Cooper — who’ve put their names in the hat to succeed Williams.

    In the end the commissioners voted for a 90-day open search and stated their preference for a chief administrator who would function , basically, as a budgetary aide and office administrator, and who would be paid in the neighborhood of $90,000 (as against Williams’ $101,000). There would be an add-on deputy, making two such in all. The county’s personnel office would be invited to assist in — but not dominate — the search process.

    In the end, acknowledged several commissioners privately, it was likely that Hutchinson would get the job. But in the meantime there would be a fair and open search. No deals. And no deal-makers, either.

    Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    Bully Pulpits

    U.S. Rep. Harold Ford Jr., whose bid to become House minority leader fell short back in November, continues to find avenues for his governmental ideas — styled “moderate” or “centrist” by most pundits but generally called “results-oriented” and “pragmatic” by the congressman and his spokespersons.

    Democrat Ford was co-featured with Arizona Republican Senator John McCain at this week’s annual dinner of the Washington Press Club, one of several venues — the National Press Club and White House Correspondents dinners being others — that are considered prime showcase opportunities inside the Beltway.

    For the occasion, Ford availed himself of speechwriting help from Al Franken, the well-known comedian and Saturday Night Live grad. But, besides conforming with the tongue-in-cheek aspects of the occasion, which will be emceed by club president Adam Clymer of The New York Times, Ford is likely also to spell out some of his views on budgetary matters, according to his chief of staff, Mark Schuermann.

    The Memphis congressman has just been named to the House Budget Committee, where, said Schuermann, he will have the opportunity to serve three terms before returning to his former base on the Education Committee.

    “He’ll obviously get to lobby for his education ideas on the Budget Committee,” says Schuermann. Equally obvious is that Ford will have a new — and conspicuous — platform to vent his ideas in general. The congressman, who last year lost to current minority leader Nancy Pelosi of California, has not closed the door on future leadership bids if Democrats continue to fail to achieve a House majority.

    Ford was tapped for the Budget Committee by ranking Democrat John Spratt of South Carolina, well known as a moderate on fiscal matters.

    · Meanwhile, Tennessee’s new governor, Democrat Phil Bredesen, continues to signal a moderate, cost-cutting approach — one that has caused some to recall a Vietnam-era joke, in which a citizen who voted for Republican Barry Goldwater in 1964 instead of Democrat Lyndon Johnson, the landslide winner, said: “People told me if I voted for Goldwater I’d see this country involved in an interminable military quagmire. Well, they were right!”

    In the contemporary Tennessee version, the lament is from a voter for Bredesen’s defeated GOP opponent, self-described fiscal conservative Van Hilleary. “They told me if I voted for Hilleary, I’d see state government programs cut to the bone! Well, they were right” goes the refrain.

    In fact, Bredesen has used his weekly cabinet meetings — three of which have been held so far — to advertise a series of forthcoming cutbacks. This week, he floated trial balloons for shifting state road funds to education and perhaps holding back portions of the state-shared tax proceeds upon which Tennessee’s local governments have depended.

    Bredesen’s picks for his cabinet, incidentally, have earned good reviews for being chosen more on merit than on patronage considerations. The three Memphians named so far are less well-known in political circles than has usually been the case with gubernatorial appointees.

    The three are: Kenneth S. Robinson, named this week as state health commissioner; Gina Betts, commissioner for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities; and John A. Keys, commissioner of Veterans Affairs. Rev. Robinson, a minister of St. Andrew A.M.E. Church here, has an extensive background in community health initiatives. Betts, the former president of the American Nurses Association, had been serving as director for health policy at UT-Memphis after a previous stint as senior adviser on nursing and policy in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Keys had been for many years the director of veterans’ affairs for Shelby County.

    · The Public Issues Forum of Memphis, a public-affairs organization founded in 1994, will inaugurate its 2003 calendar with a forum on TennCare, the state’s ever-beleaguered health-insurance system, to be held at 3 p.m. Sunday at First Congregational Church on South Cooper.

    A panel will examine TennCare, which faces renewed cuts under state budgetary restraints, from a Memphis and Shelby County perspective. Panel members include: Dr. Cyril Chang, professor of economics at the University of Memphis; Dr. David Mirvis, director of the Center for Health Services Research at UT-Memphis; and Don Voth, director of the Memphis and Shelby County Mental Health Summit. Happy Jones will serve as facilitator.

    · Although two other candidates — Jerry Cobb and Arnold Weiner — are contesting the issue, Kemp Conrad is considered the odds-on favorite to be named the next chairman of the Shelby County Republican Party at the party’s forthcoming convention, to be held at White Station High School on Sunday, February 23rd.

    Conrad’s troops were in great evidence two weeks ago during the local GOP’s reorganizational caucuses. A transplanted Georgian, Conrad headed up the local party’s minority outreach program during the past year.

    Outreach will be an implicit theme of the GOP’s annual Lincoln Day Dinner at the Adam’s Mark Hotel this Saturday. Featured speaker will be U.S. Education Secretary Rod Paige, one of several prominent African Americans (two others being Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice) in the Bush administration. ·

    Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    A SEPARATE PEACE

    Two heavyweights came to Memphis to talk about war with Iraq last week, and the reception they got says something about the task facing President George W. Bush as he tries to lead the country into war.

    On Sunday, William Sloane Coffin, a liberal anti-war voice in the 1960s, spoke at a “service for peace” at Idlewild Presbyterian Church. Idlewild senior pastor Stephen Montgomery, part of an ecumenical group of organizers that also included Kenneth Corr of First Baptist Church, Frank Thomas of Mississippi Boulevard Christian Church, CB Baker of St. Mary’s Cathedral, and Scott Morris of the Church Health Center, had optimistically predicted a crowd of 300 or maybe 500.

    Instead, 1,100 people packed the sanctuary.

    What was as notable as the size of the crowd was its constituency. This was a slice of the Memphis establishment, and its average age seemed to be well over 50. The service began with such anthems of the Sixties as “Where Have All the Flowers Gone?,” “Blowin’ in the Wind,” and “If I Had a Hammer,” but that was about where the similarities to the anti-war movement in the Vietnam era ended.

    There was a lot more tweed than denim, far more neckties than T-shirts. Whatever the political leanings of those who attended and it’s a safe guess there were as many Republicans as Democrats they stood and applauded vigorously after Coffin made his staunchly anti-war remarks. At 78, the former Yale chaplain and CIA operative’s voice is still strong, although he seemed to struggle a little at the end of his speech.

    The loudest ovations of the evening, however, went to the Spirit of Soulsville Singers from the new Stax Music Academy and the LeMoyne-Owen College Choir and soloist Tanisha Mack. Music, now as then, is the thing that bonds a movement and gives it its character.

    Three nights earlier, journalist and author Robin Wright talked about Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden to about 300 people at Rhodes college. It was a lecture, not a rally, and Wright was careful to say she was nonpartisan. But Wright, who covers the Middle East and Colin Powell for the Los Angeles Times, left no doubt she thinks the country is headed for war, probably within seven weeks.

    She stuck to her promise of neutrality, but her catalog of the atrocities of Saddam and the political and cultural conditions in Iraq and Iran suggested she thinks Bush and Powell are on the proper course.

    Again, I was struck by the composition of the crowd mostly middle-aged, as many or more faculty and friends as students. As Wright noted, this is not the way it was when the country was agonizing over Vietnam.

    She is a 1971 graduate of the University of Michigan, as I am. She wrote a feminist vanguard sports column called “Broadside” for the campus paper.

    The war dominated campus politics, dominated everything, for that matter. We went to freshman orientation in the summer of 1967 as the riots raged and the fires burned in nearby Detroit. We got our dorm assignments, meal plans, football tickets ($14 for the season), and a you-guys-don’t-know-squat welcoming speech from a member of Students for Democratic Society (SDS), the radical anti-war group founded a few years earlier by Michigan student Tom Hayden.

    By 1970, when universities all across America were shut down by student strikes, you could go to an anti-war rally every month or even every week if you were so inclined. On a national level, Coffin was one of the organizers. But at Ann Arbor, I don’t remember many older people, other than professors, being involved in them. I think it had a lot to do with the draft.

    It’s different this time. There’s no draft. We slid gradually into Vietnam. We’re leaping, or not leaping possibly, into Iraq. But where are the Tom Haydens and William Sloane Coffins of today?

    And if you can get 1,100 people to come on fairly short notice to a service at one of the most establishment churches in Memphis and stand to applaud William Sloane Coffin, can President Bush and his advisers not be having some very serious doubts about the willingness of the United States to go to war in Iraq at this time?

    Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    Short Bread

    Even as the president and Congress hunker down in Washington this week to take on questions of war and peace, so are newly inaugurated Governor Phil Bredesen and members of the state legislature constrained to address some intractable problems at the state level.

    Just as George W. Bush made his annual report to the nation this week via his State of the Union address, so will Bredesen be obliged to clarify Tennessee issues in a State of the State address, probably next week.

    Although perspectives necessarily differ, what the two executives and their respective legislatures have in common is a situation of multiplying demands and diminishing fiscal base.

    It was only last year that former Governor Don Sundquist, who had fought unsuccessfully for a tax-reform package based on a state income tax, reluctantly signed into law a mammoth $933 million sales-tax increase — the largest tax increase in Tennessee history. Now comes word from Bredesen that the state is still short by more than half a billion dollars — and the shortage is especially pronounced in the case of the state’s revamped (but still costly) TennCare insurance program.

    Meeting with his cabinet for the first time last week in Nashville, Bredesen announced that the state looked to have a $511 million shortfall. Meeting with cabinet members again this week, the governor said he’d identified an additional shortfall which could be attributed directly to TennCare.

    “We’ve found two flat errors,” Bredesen said. TennCare is the problem — with an anticipated shortfall of $259 million for this year and a larger one for next year. As the governor explained, the state has begun paying $100 million to hospitals bearing a disproportionate load of TennCare patients. Moreover, the state miscalculated the reduction in federal payments resulting from the terms of the latest federal waiver under which the Tennessee program — a substitute for Medicaid — operates. That could mean another $80 million in unforeseen costs.

    Accordingly, former healthcare entrepreneur Bredesen seems inclined to follow through on his campaign promise — businesslike but hardly inspirational — to apply his “management” skills to the state’s fiscal problem. In the short run, that means downsizing.

    The new governor promised in his inaugural address of two weekends ago — relatively brief and delivered to a shivering, undersized crowd of auditors in War Memorial Plaza — to find some practical middle between the state’s needs and what it can afford. He now says he wants to cut the number of state employees — excluding educational employees — to about 37,200, a figure equivalent to the number on the state payroll three years ago.

    Sweetening the pill with a promise to forgo his own $89,000 annual salary, mega-millionaire Bredesen also instructed his department heads to reduce their budget requests for the new year by some 7.5 percent. He foresaw, however, that several departments — TennCare, Corrections, Children’s Services, and Mental Health and Mental Retardation — might not be able to toe that line.

    The state financial crunch is likely to cut quite close to home, of course. Or so believes Rufus Jones, the able city lobbyist who served more than a decade in the state House of Representatives before leaving to make an unsuccessful run for Congress in 1996.

    “If we don’t heal this split, we’re going to be losing dollars. Every which way,” said Jones at a Tuesday lunch at the University of Memphis, which followed a meeting of the Shelby County delegation with various government officials.

    The “split,” as Jones defined it, is the widening gap in opinion between spokespersons for the city of Memphis on one hand and various county entities on the other over the issue of education — specifically, how to amend relations between the Memphis school system and the Shelby County system.

    Both Memphis mayor Willie Herenton and county mayor A C Wharton were heard from by the legislators, as were various suburban mayors, speaking more or less as a body. Neither the twain nor the triad met, and that is more or less what Jones had in mind. Disunity over the school-reorganization issue — Herenton proposes consolidation, the suburban mayors are adamant against it, and Wharton splits the difference — is an impediment to agreements on a variety of other issues for which the city and county need state aid.

    The newly elected chair of the legislative delegation, Rep. Carol Chumney of Midtown, is still hopeful that the various conflicts can evolve into a regional consensus, however. To this end she has proposed broadening delegation contacts in Nashville with those of adjoining Tennessee counties and in Memphis with those of counties in adjoining states.

    “We need more people sitting at the table. From all around,” Chumney said this week. “We need a combined urban-suburban consensus on the school issue.” Though she ran for county mayor last year on a platform which emphasized city/county consolidation, she is leery of solutions — like that proposed by Herenton — which emphasize a sudden dissolution of divisions into one unitary school system.

    “It’s always a good idea to get the facts out before rushing forward with something,” said Chumney, who noted that Herenton had proposed many dramatic initiatives in the past, only to “drop them like a hot potato.” Of the Memphis mayor’s current proposal to unify the schools by abolishing the Memphis school board by referendum, legislative action, or whatever other means proves necessary — Chumney observed skeptically, “Is this a serious thing? Or just the idea of the week.?”

    Economic ideas like the desirability of impact or development fees should get a fair hearing before consolidation, lest the city and county property tax be counted on to pay for increased short-term costs, Chumney said.

    Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    POLITICS

    BOMBSHELL OR DUD?

    If the current scramble to reconfigure the school systems of Shelby County were a board game, then the card played Tuesday afternoon by Memphis city council attorney Allen Wade would have been marked “Bombshell” in big letters on its backside.

    The fine print on the other side, as Wade outlined it to a rapt audience of council members and onlookers at the council’s “retreat” at the Oaksedge complex, was that the Memphis school board, which city mayor Willie Herenton wants to abolish, has no legal right to exist in the first place.

    Wade passed out copies of his legal opinion that two conditions — the failure to renew a 99-year charter creating the school board in 1869 and state laws distinguishing between “special school districts” so chartered and municipal systems — made the currently constituted city school board null and void.

    Though some partisans of Herenton’s proposal to dissolve the board in favor of county control of all schools were delighted (notably council member TaJuan Stout-Mitchell), members of the Memphis school board itself seemed unfazed.

    Deni Hirsch, who attended the retreat as a spectator, merely noted, “We’re here. It’s a fact,” while her colleague Lora Jobe responded later, “Wade needs to research a little longer. Obviously we exist.”

    And even Wade seemed to acknowledge that , just as certain published rules of thermodynamics preclude a bumblebee’s ability to fly but did not prevent such a thing occuring, the council lawyer’s mere statement would not by and of itself cause the school board — which this week ratified a rival reorganization plan proposed by Shelby County mayor A C Wharton — to up and go away. Just as one still encounters bumblebees in the air, so one can find school board members meeting, drawing their modest pay, running for election — and making policy on the wing.

    Herenton, who made a pitch for his single-district proposal to the council members — similar to one he had made previously to Shelby County legislators — scoffed at the action of the school board, which he had castigated for a solid month before formally proposing its dissolution last week.

    “In its wisdom,” the board had approved the Wharton plan, Herenton noted sarcastically , pointedly adding, “and I use that term advisedly.” In the county mayor’s plan, the city board would enable the construction of new school facilities in Shelby county by waiving its right to its share of capital construction funding, according to the state Average Daily Attendance (ADA) formula which allocates such finds to the city and county on a 3:1 ratio.

    Both the mayor and city finance director Joseph Lee made the case to council members that costs of maintaining a unitary school system in place of separate city and county systems would be more economical in the long run. They acknowledged, as did Wade, that the means to achieving a unitary system would involve a “transfer” of authority from the city board to the Shelby County school board, not an arbitrary surrender of the city board’s charter, achieved presumably by popular referendum.

    A presentation in favor of the Herenton proposal by public relations executive Becky West was greeted skeptically by several council members, who saw its polled conclusions seemingly favoring the plan to be based on what council members Janet Hooks and Tom Marshall called “skewed” — or leading — questions.

    PREVIOUSLY POSTED

    SHORT BREAD

    The state’s financial crunch, warned about by a cost-cutting Governor Phil Bredesen last week, is likely to cut quite close to home. Or so believes Rufus Jones, the able city lobbyist who served more than a decade in the state House of Representatives before leaving to make an unsuccessful run

    for Congress in 1996.

    “If we don’t heal this split, we’re going to be losing dollars. Every which way,” said Jones at a Tuesday lunch at

    the University of Memphis, which followed a meeting of the Shelby County delegation with various government officials.

    The “split,” as Jones defined it, is the widening gap in opinion between spokespersons for the city of Memphis on one hand and variouscounty entities on the other over the issue of education specifically, how to amend relations between the Memphis school system and the Shelby County system.

    Both Memphis mayor Willie Herenton and county mayor A C Wharton were heard from by the legislators, as were various suburban mayors, speaking more or less as a body. Neither the twain nor the triad met, and that is more or less what Jones had in mind.

    Disunity over the school-reorganization issue — Herenton proposes consolidation, the suburban mayors are adamant against it, and Wharton splits the difference — is an impediment to agreements on a variety of other issues for which the city and county need state aid.

    The newly elected chair of the legislative delegation, Rep. Carol Chumney of Midtown, is still hopeful that the various conflicts can evolve into a regional consensus, however. To this end she has proposed broadening delegation contacts in Nashville with those of adjoining Tennessee counties and in Memphis with those of counties in adjoining states.

    “We need more people sitting at the table. From all around,” Chumney said this week. “We need a combined urban-suburban consensus on the school issue.” Though she ran for county mayor last year on a platform which emphasized city/county consolidation, she is leery of solutions like that proposed by Herenton which emphasize a sudden dissolution of divisions into one unitary school system.

    “It’s always a good idea to get the facts out before rushing forward with something,”said Chumney, who noted that Herenton had proposed many dramatic initiatives in the past, only to “drop them like a hot potato.” Of the Memphis mayor’s current proposal to unify the schools by abolishing the Memphis school board by referendum, legislative action, or whatever other means proves necessary Chumney observed skeptically, “Is this a serious thing? Or just the idea of the week.?”

    Economic ideas like the desirability of impact or development fees should get a fair hearing before consolidation, lest the city and county property tax be counted on to pay for increased short-term costs, Chumney said.

    Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    WAR ON IRAQ WILL COST TENNESSEE $1.3 BILLION

    Now more than ever, the Tennessee State Legislature face great challenges in addressing the wounded economy, budget shortfalls, growing needs of working families, and the new costs of heightened security and the threat of war. As President of WAND, the parent organization of the national multi-partisan network The Women Legislators’ Lobby, we are very concerned about the cuts in the Federal Budget to provide money for a war in Iraq and the wrong message that is being sent to our children. WiLL helps provide the big picture on federal policies and programs affecting our state, and offers creative solutions and fresh ideas necessary for effective leadership.

    We face one of the worst fiscal crises in years. States have at least a collective $17.5 billion budget gap to fill before fiscal year 2003 ends, and this is after the vast majority of states have imposed significant cuts to balance their budgets in addition to imposing taxes to increase revenue. Tennessee is no exception, with an $400 million budget gap this past fiscal year and a 1cent increase in sales tax for this year. More hard times lay ahead as we debate or finalize additional budget cuts for the next fiscal year. At the same time, the unemployment rate in Tennessee continues to grow with an increase from 4.2% to 5.6% over the past year.

    In Tennessee, the federal government contributes 33% to our state budget. This money pays for schools, public assistance, roads, health care and other programs important to Tennessee residents. While Tennessee struggle through our fiscal crises and budget cuts, the federal government’s spending cuts threaten to make it even more difficult for Tennessee to meet its people’s needs. Under a White House budget plan that Congress will take up in the next month, spending for domestic programs other than homeland security would be held at $316 billion in the current fiscal year, the same as last year. Overall the total amount in federal formula grant programs to states would be cut by $2.4 billion (accounting for inflation), resulting in serious losses to local communities. It is expected that this frugal approach will continue in the FY2004 budget that Mr. Bush will propose next month.

    Under The propose federal budget for FY 2003 Tennessee will lose:

  • Highway Planning and Construction——– $177,927,780

    Airport Improvement Program $ 760,600

    Workforce Investment Act $ 6,423,140

    Low-Income Energy Assistance Program $ 4,617,040

    Elementary & Secondary Education $ 19,689.820

    Clean Water Revolving Fund $ 22,100,700

    Drinking water Revolving Fund $ 687,180

    Additionally, many programs important to families such as the child Care and Development Block Grants have been level-funded. In other words, once inflation is taken into account, those programs will have less money and provide fewer services.

    As a member of the Tennessee General Assembly, I understand that federal grants and payments to public schools, local law enforcement agencies, universities, research laboratories, our state highway department are all crucial to the state budget, and that this virtual freeze on domestic spending hurts our communities.

    During the past year, Congress and the White House neglected welfare re-authorization, an extension of unemployment benefits, and an extension for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which is incorporated into TennCare in Tennessee. The total increase cost in military spending to the state of Tennessee will be $612 million. Just with nuclear weapons alone, costing $16.5 billion and Tennessee’s burden of this cost is $219 million. This amount would buy:

  • Head Start for 32,047 Tennessee Children

  • Health Care coverage for 137,509 Tennessee youth

  • Affordable housing units for 3,123 Tennessee families

  • Teachers for 5,101 Tennessee elementary classrooms

    In addition to the $80 to $100 billion cost for the war on Iraq, experts have weighed in on the reconstruction efforts during the recent hearings on Iraq. According to Samuel Berger, Senior Policy Advisor during the Clinton Administration, the re-building of Iraqi economy would range from $50-$150 billion. Scott R. Fell, retired colonel and expert on post-conflict reconstruction, argued that significant material and personnel resources would be required for reconstruction. He stated, that security, humanitarian and emergency aid, transitional administration, civil service and other components or reconstruction would cost from $15 to $25 billion over the next decade. The U. S. had much international support during the Gulf War. Allies picked up almost 90% of its cost. However, this war does not have international support. Many allies have made it clear that they are not in favor of a preemptive strike. Germany and Saudi Arabia, among the largest cash and in-kind contributors of the Gulf War, have indicated their complete opposition to in invasion. The people in Tennessee and across this nation should expect to pay for most of the war as well as reconstruction. The federal budget decisions directly impact our constituent’s daily lives and that when cuts are made our state programs for women and children disproportionately bear the budget ax. We have been taught down through the years to defend ourselves should some one strike us. Is a preemptive strike against Iraq setting the right kind of example for our children?

  • Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    SONICS SOAR PAST GRIZ, 95-83

    Vladimir Radmanovic scored 19 of his career-high 29 points in the second half to lead the Seattle SuperSonics to a 95-83 victory over the Memphis Grizzlies.

    Radmanovic also established career bests by making six three-pointers on 11 attempts. He scored nine points in the third quarter, helping Seattle erase a five-point halftime deficit and win for just the third time in 11 games. “Everybody knows who can shoot and who cannot shoot,” Radmanovic said. “They probably wanted to stop something else, but when you stop something else, then something else is going to be open. I think that’s what happened.”

    Rashard Lewis also scored nine points in the third quarter and finished with 22. Lewis, who grabbed 10 rebounds, converted a three-point play with 8:10 left in the period to cap an 11-1 run and give the Sonics a 57-52 lead.

    “They’ve got to do that more often,” Seattle guard Gary Payton said of Radmanovic and Lewis. “They’re up and down. They had a good game tonight, and they see when they have good games it takes a lot of pressure off a lot of guys.” Payton had 18 points, six assists and five rebounds for the Sonics, who defeated the Grizzlies for the 26th time in 30 meetings.

    Payton became the fourth player in NBA history to record 18,000 points and 7,000 assists when he made a fast-break layup with 4:55 left in the first quarter. Payton joined John Stockton, Oscar Robertson and Isiah Thomas in the elite group. Payton and Stockton are the only ones who also have 2,000 steals. Memphis stormed to the halftime lead after trailing 31-23 at the end of one quarter.

    Pau Gasol scored 13 of his 25 points in the second period and made 7-of-8 shots over the opening 24 minutes. But he shot just 4-of-8 after halftime. In the third quarter, the Grizzlies shot 26 percent (5-of-19) and were outscored, 28-15. They shot 54 percent (19-of-35) in the first half.

    “We are in the upper echelon in field goal percentage,” Memphis coach Hubie Brown said. “Now all of a sudden we … can’t make a shot.”

    Lorenzen Wright had 14 points and 12 rebounds for the Grizzlies, who have lost five of their last six games. “It’s very frustrating,” Wright said. “It seems like we’re constantly taking steps back and we’re not improving. We didn’t play our game tonight. We didn’t play together and didn’t play defense.”

    Categories
    Politics Politics Beat Blog

    BREDESEN BLOWS FRESH AIR INTO CABINET MEETING

    NASHVILLE — Gov. Phil Bredesen is a walking, talking microprocessor: feed him information, he’ll process it and give you a solution. That’s the impression the Harvard-educated physics major and successful businessman gave Tuesday during his first Cabinet meeting.

    After eight years of Don Sundquist, who gamely tried to pass an income tax in his turbulent last two years in office, Bredesen and his new team are a breath of fresh air.

    In fact, they’re so fresh that Bredesen turned to his chief lobbyist to explain some simple facts of legislative life.

    Lawmakers come to Nashville on Mondays for a 5 p.m. session. They gather in committee meetings on Tuesdays.

    On Wednesdays, legislators hold committees throughout the morning and hold floor sessions in the afternoon.

    For at least the first couple of months, lawmakers head for the hills after 9 a.m. floor sessions, Anna Windrow told Bredesen’s Cabinet.

    Of course, this was not news to some in the Cabinet. Agriculture Commissioner Ken Givens and Economic and Community Development Commissioner Matt Kisber left the Legislature just two months ago, knowing they likely could not win re-election after supporting an income tax.

    Finance Commissioner Dave Goetz and Labor and Workforce Development Commissioner Jim Neeley have been around. Goetz is a former business trade association lobbyist and radio and television reporter who covered Capitol Hill. Neeley was labor commissioner for Gov. Ray Blanton, 1975-79, in one of the most forgettable administrations in Tennessee history.

    But for most of the remaining 17 Cabinet members, Tuesday’s meeting was the first step in their on-the-job training.

    For his part, Bredesen is rearing to go.

    “In a way, it’s kind of invigorating,” he said.

    Bredesen said he’s ready to tackle Tennessee’s worst problems, a budget shortfall and the yawning TennCare monster that needs at least $259 million more this budget year and about twice that amount for the new fiscal year that begins July 1.

    Cabinet members are working on their budget requests for the new fiscal year. Bredesen warned them they cannot expect more money than their departments received this year. And, he instructed them to come up with ways to cut spending by 2.5 percent and 5 percent.

    In addition to the TennCare expenses, the state has to come up with $45 million to cover increases in state employee health care premiums. In the frantic final days of last year’s legislative session — it happened in the previous two years as well — legislators and Sundquist failed to appropriate the money.

    That won’t happen on his watch, Bredesen said.

    “I don’t want to wait until 11:59” to deal with problems that must be settled before lawmakers go home for the year, he said. “This $45 million health care problem has that flavor.”

    How about an ethics policy? Bredesen and his legal counsel, respected Nashville lawyer Bob Cooper, are working on that as well.

    Cabinet members should receive a draft ethics policy, focusing on financial disclosures and conflicts of interest, any day now.

    “We have a state in which lobbyists are a very powerful force,” Bredesen said. That’s an understatement. Lobbyists are responsible for most of the legislation that is approved every year. They draft bills, take them to prospective sponsors, line up co-sponsors, testify before legislative committees and then count votes to ensure passage. Sometimes, they all but punch the voting buttons for lawmakers.

    “I just want you to keep a friendly arm’s length,” Bredesen told his Cabinet.

    Speaking of legislators, Bredesen reminded his group that the Legislature is a separate branch of government. “Don’t let them chase you around the table,” he said.

    Still, Cabinet members need to get to know legislators. Bredesen noted that he called on Lt. Gov. John Wilder, the Senate speaker, and House Speaker on Tuesday morning, his first official day in office.

    Meantime, Bredesen said he wants information from his managers. He wants them to offer ideas that he can absorb, process and use to solve the mammoth problems facing Tennessee.

    “I don’t want to leave problems for the future,” he said.