Categories
Opinion The Last Word

Refugees and Us

On September 9th, Mayor Jim Strickland announced that a small number of Afghans — maybe 36 — would be welcome in Memphis; some would be resettled here under a special visa arrangement, eligible for federal funding. Others would have to apply for political asylum and appear, sometime in the future, before a federal immigration judge who will determine their eligibility/status under U.S. asylum laws.

The images this past August of tens of thousands fleeing Afghanistan for “anywhere in the world” were shocking. They reminded those of us of a certain age of the Fall of Saigon in 1975. Many Vietnamese were resettled in Memphis — leading to a small but thriving Vietnamese community at Cleveland and Madison here in Midtown. More robust Vietnamese communities developed in Los Angeles and New Orleans.

More recently, Haiti. The images last month of white men on horseback pushing back dark-skinned Haitian people as they tried to cross from Mexico to the United States were disturbing. But not any more disturbing than the images we “don’t” see of the many brown-skinned people who die of heat stroke, etc. in the Sonoran Desert while attempting to enter the USA. Last year, 113 people died trying to cross into the United States at the southern border. Between 2001 and 2017, 2,833 human remains were recovered in Southern Arizona — 40 percent of those persons have never been identified.

We have, it seems to us, a moral responsibility to help the people of Haiti. What we’ve done is deported 2,000 Haitians back to a Haiti they barely recognize. We’ve admitted about 12,000 into the U.S. to stay with relatives until their asylum petitions can be heard by a judge. The Biden administration has extended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians who arrived in the U.S. before July 29th of this year. TPS is offered to people from certain nations — nations that are too unstable or overwhelmed due to political or environmental catastrophe — to receive deportees.

Haiti has witnessed all of the above. First, there was the devastating 2010 earthquake that measured 7.0 on the Richter scale and struck 14 miles from the capital city, killing more than 100,000 and leveling a quarter of a million structures. Then, political instability leading to the assassination of the sitting president of Haiti this past spring, followed by hurricanes and another earthquake, measuring 7.2, on August 14th.

Haitian nationals have been living throughout South America and Mexico since 2010 (and earlier). Many were employed in Brazil, helping to build stadiums and infrastructure for the 2016 Summer Olympics; some headed to Chile where they were able to find work, but both countries’ economies contracted, and Haitians went from helpful labor force to non-citizen nuisance. Their only hope? The United States.

They assembled at Del Rio — a town about 150 miles west of San Antonio, Texas, and the reaction to so many people huddled under a bridge was hysterical and histrionic. Both the media and politicians stayed with the story — both hoping to gain viewership and political points.

Our nation can certainly absorb 12,000 Haitian nationals. Germany alone, with far less space than the USA, took in more than a million Syrian refugees during the past decade.

We can probably take in 1,000 here in Memphis. Why not try? It will cost some money to resettle, re-train, and set up housing, but remember, we spent about two trillion dollars during a 20-year war in Afghanistan that failed to achieve its stated objective. Even before the U.S. left the nation, the country slipped back into Taliban control.

We would spend far less than two trillion to support our Haitian brothers and sisters, and we have a responsibility to help this Caribbean nation plagued by natural catastrophe, venial and corrupt politicians, and a United States whose meddling often results in troubling consequences. Don’t forget the United States’ engineering of the exit of Haiti’s then-President Jean-Bertrand Aristide as a violent coup unfolded in 2004.

Memphis has a history of welcoming neighbors and successfully resettling refugees. Now is the time to act to welcome our brothers and sisters from Haiti; they need our help and our city can always embrace their talents and energy. Building human capacity — by investing in refugees — makes more sense than throwing trillions of dollars at unpleasant, unwinnable wars.

Bryce Ashby is a Memphis-based attorney and the board chair of Latino Memphis. Michael LaRosa teaches history at Rhodes College.

Categories
News News Blog

Harris Welcomes Afghan Refugees in Letter to Biden

The county is ready to welcome Afghan refugees, Shelby County Mayor Lee Harris said in a letter to President Joe Biden. 

Harris sent a letter to Biden Thursday affirming the county’s position to resettle those fleeing Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover last month, saying that he hopes the offer will be a lifeline for those who assisted U.S. troops. 

“As our country welcomes refugees from Afghanistan, I am writing to let you know the government of Shelby County, Tennessee, stands ready to provide support and stability to those fleeing violence and oppression,” Lee said. “I believe we have a moral duty to help those in dire circumstances who supported our troops.” 

Harris added that the county will welcome those who are likely to face discrimination and harassment in Afghanistan — women and girls seeking to further their education and LGBTQ+ individuals. 

“We know resettlement is often a last resort for those who cannot return home,” Lee wrote. “As they travel across the oceans and start to rebuild their lives, we offer our goodwill and support. In our community, we take pride in having grit.

“These refugees have proven to have that same spirit. We would be honored to have them join our community. For these reasons and more, Shelby County proudly stands with your administration in offering a beacon of hope to the Afghan refugees.”

Read the full letter below. 

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Nonprofit Prepares to Assist Afghan Families Arriving in Memphis

World Relief Memphis, a nonprofit that serves newly arrived refugees here, is gearing up to assist Afghan refugees resettling in Memphis.

As Afghan families flee their country following the Taliban takeover, PJ Moore, executive director of World Relief Memphis said he anticipates a number will be coming in Memphis. 

“As a community we have to be educated and able to receive these families well,” Moore said. “Memphis is a city known for Southern hospitality. We have a long history of welcoming people from all over the world and now we have an opportunity to make a difference in the lives of those who are fleeing horrific circumstances.”

World Relief Memphis is the only resettlement agency in the city and is a part of a larger global organization that operates in nine countries and 20 U.S. cities. 

World Relief officials are currently working with the U.S. State Department to process Afghan evacuees arriving in Virginia, Wisconsin, and Texas. 

Because of World Relief Memphis’ previously existing contract with the State Department to work with refugees, Moore said he anticipates the organization will facilitate the resettlement of a number of Afghan families with Special Immigrant Visas (SIV) here in the coming months. SIV holders are those whose lives are threatened as a result of their service to the U.S. military. 

Moore said there are currently two families confirmed to be coming, but he doesn’t know the exact number of additional families that will be coming or when they will arrive. 

But when they do, World Relief is preparing to offer families help integrating into the community, by assisting with finding housing and jobs, learning English, and navigating a new culture.

Housing will be a key need for arriving families. World Relief Memphis is currently looking for partners, such as apartment complex owners and private families to provide temporary and permanent housing.

Moore said the public can also help by advocating, donating money and household items, or volunteering. Volunteer opportunities range from doing office work to extending social and relational support to new families. 

The organization will hold a volunteer orientation Tuesday, August 24th, at 6:30 pm. More information about the orientation and how to sign up can be found here

“These are ordinary people like you and me that have undergone extraordinary circumstances,” Moore said. “They are incredibly resilient and they want the same things you and I want for their lives. They want peace, security, and hope for the future. These are the reasons they’ve fled the conflict and persecution.”

Categories
Opinion The Last Word

We Need to Save Afghans Who Helped Our Troops

A photograph of Sohail Pardis’ bloody, decapitated head is circulating on the internet. On May 12th of this year, Pardis, age 32, was stopped at a roadblock on the highway between Kabul, Afghanistan, and Khost Province. The roadblock was manned by Taliban fighters. Witnesses reported that the Taliban pulled Pardis from his vehicle and cut off his head. Sohail Pardis left behind a 9-year-old daughter.

So why should you care that much about the murder of Sohail Pardis? Most Americans quit thinking about Afghanistan years ago. The war has just been something in the background of our lives for some time. Here’s why you should care about the murder of Sohail Pardis. He was murdered because of what he did for our country. Almost a decade before his murder, Pardis served as an interpreter for 16 months with U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

In a story published by CNN on its website on July 23rd, Pardis’ friend Abdulhaq Ayoubi said Pardis had been receiving death threats from the Taliban: “They were telling him you are a spy for the Americans, you are the eyes of the Americans, and you are infidel, and we will kill you and your family.” This was not an idle threat for Pardis, and it is not an idle threat in general. Since 2014, No One Left Behind, an advocacy group for Afghan and Iraqi interpreters, estimates that approximately 300 Afghan interpreters and family members have been murdered by the Taliban.

In 2006, our government began a Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program for Afghan and Iraqi interpreters and their families. Congress intended that applications for SIVs were to be processed within months, but most applicants must wait at least three years for a decision on their applications. Many have been waiting for years longer. Successive administrations have allowed a great backlog of pending cases to pile up. When President Biden announced on April 15th that the U.S. would withdraw its forces from Afghanistan by September 11th, almost 18,000 Afghan interpreters and their families were waiting for a decision on their applications.

The president made no provisions for those Afghan interpreters and their families in his withdrawal announcement. The withdrawal has moved quickly, and Taliban has made significant advances since the president first spoke. Fearing for the lives of our comrades and their families, American veterans and other concerned Americans began to speak up. We talked to the media and we wrote opinion pieces. We emailed our congressmen and our senators, and we emailed the president. We demanded the evacuation of those Afghans who had served with us, for so long and so well.

We’ve been heard, to some extent. On July 8th, President Biden told those Afghans who served with us as interpreters, cooks, and drivers “[t]hat there is a home for you in the United States.” On July 14th, the Biden administration announced the launch of “Operation Allies Refuge,” a program of relocation flights for Afghans and their families who have pending Special Immigrant Visa applications. Evacuation would begin in the last week of July, and 2,500 interpreters and their families, whose visa applications were all but complete, would be flown to Fort Lee in Virginia for final processing. Talks were reportedly underway with third countries to temporarily house those Afghans and their families, whose visa applications are not as far along.

On July 22nd, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the bipartisan ALLIES Act, by a vote of 407-16. The legislation will increase the number of annual Special Immigrant Visas by 8,000 and will streamline the complicated SIV process. Congressman Steve Cohen was a co-sponsor of the ALLIES Act. Local Republican Congressman David Kustoff voted for the act.

Our Afghan comrades and their families are not out of jeopardy yet. Evacuation flights were to begin in this last week of July. As of today, July 27th, flights have yet to begin. The 2,500 interpreters and their families who will be flown to Fort Lee represent just a tiny percentage of the thousands of Afghans and their families who have pending SIV applications. The evacuation planes will fly out of the airport in Kabul; those Afghan interpreters and their families who live in Afghan cities and towns other than Kabul will have to run the gauntlet of Taliban roadblocks to get to Kabul.

Much remains to be done before our country makes good on its promises to those Afghans who stepped forward to serve shoulder to shoulder with U.S. forces in the war. It’s too late to save Sohail Pardis, but it’s not too late to deliver on that promise to thousands of other brave Afghans and their families. If you think our country’s word ought to mean something, then contact President Biden. Contact your senators and your representatives. Tell them it’s time to give those who helped us a chance to restart their lives in the United States of America. 

Kevin R. Rardin is a retired Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Reserve.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

No Domestic War Zones

My scariest moment in a war zone was only two weeks after getting to Afghanistan.

I was in a convoy of six vehicles going to pick up some new arrivals. On our way back to the base, the vehicle I was driving had a transmission failure. This happened in what was considered a particularly dangerous part of the city. We dismounted our vehicles and took our protective positions, as one of the senior soldiers more familiar with the vehicle did troubleshooting.  

Corey Strong

We were vulnerable and exposed, and I experienced real fear despite the training I had received. While on my knee with my long rifle at the ready, I saw families walking back and forth in their community. I can tell you with confidence that a dozen armed men in armed vehicles made them just as afraid of us as we were of them.

Black Americans know that fear all too well. The deaths of George Floyd and countless others have made the country come to grips with this tragic reality — the reality that police forces all over the country for over 30 years have purchased $6 billion worth of equipment with a specific military purpose from the federal government. Along with the equipment, police have incorporated militaristic tactics to enforce racist policies targeted at black communities, such as the failed War on Drugs.

With 17 years of experience with military equipment, I can tell you that most police departments don’t have the experience and level of training needed to operate this equipment properly, which is a waste of our public dollars.

More importantly, this military armament is not the right equipment for policing in our communities. A 2017 study in Research and Politics has shown purchase of military equipment through the DOD 1033 program leads to higher levels of violence by law enforcement agencies — as well as against them.

This is not surprising to me. Even with the most powerful and well-trained military in the world, General Petraeus knew we and our NATO allies could not restore faith in a country with force, but instead would have to go about “winning hearts and minds.” That is what I did during my two tours in Afghanistan, and that is what our elected leaders and police should focus on here. The first step in winning back trust in our communities is to stop buying this equipment and discontinue using military-style tactics on civilians.

The dollars we spend on that equipment can be used to fund a long list of data-based solutions that will reduce violent interactions with the police, increase trust in those public servants, and reduce crime overall. We could create a Mental Health First Responders corps as an alternative to police, when 911 is used. We can invest in nonprofits that focus on crime and community life. A 2017 study in the American Sociological Review shows that for every 10 nonprofits funded there is an appreciable drop in the murder, violent crime, and property crime rates. We could fund the Shelby County Crime Commission to perform predictive policing to predict and intervene with officers who have a high risk of violent encounters.

Finally, we could invest in job training programs and growing industries that offer higher paying jobs so that members of our community reach their full potential and never have to consider a life of crime. The $650,000 mine-resistant vehicle Memphis Police Department purchased in 2016 could have funded these solutions and many others.

So, when you hear the terms “defund” and “demilitarize” in reference to the police, instead of fearing some lawless world without police, embrace a real future where our public dollars are used effectively to keep our communities safe and serve all people safely.

Corey Strong is an educator, commander in the Naval Reserves, and congressional candidate.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Corker as Change Agent

As has been the case more often than not, Tennessee possesses political figures of great potential to influence national policy. A case in point is the state’s junior U.S. Senator, Bob Corker, who holds the pivotal position of chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Like many of his Senatorial colleagues, Corker often includes in his prepared remarks veritable rabbit-warrens of ambivalence that, in ordinary discourse, happily, he can discard in favor of plain talk.

A case of that occurred last week when the Senator was in Tennessee in the aftermath of President Trump‘s awkward rhetorical attempts to suggest a moral equivalence in the clash between white nationalists and counter-protestors in Charlottesville, Virginia.

In Knoxville on Wednesday, faced with a battery of reporters, Corker was asked about the president’s remarks and promptly began to equivocate.

He and the president had a “healthy relationship,” Corker said. “Each of us has our own style. We go about things in a different way.”

Pressed a little harder, he said, “I did not see them [Trump’s comments]. I don’t see a lot of television, I apologize … Look, I respond in my own way. My comments are the ones I focus on, and I think the media does a plenty good job and has plenty of panelists on and others giving editorial comment about other peoples’ comments and mine.”

Pressed still further later on, the senator said, “Look, I let the president’s comments speak for themselves. There are plenty of people who editorialize about those. I’m responsible for my comments and how I feel, and people editorialize about those, too … I mean I don’t know what ginned up the event in Charlottesville except that there was a lot of hate on display there. Again, certainly it needs to end.”

A final query came from a reporter in Knoxville who was still unsatisfied and asked Corker if it wasn’t time to take a stand rather than “walking in the middle of the line trying to make everybody happy.”

The senator’s response? “I just think everybody has to speak on these issues the way they feel best.”

Then came Thursday and another Q and A with reporters after Corker’s speech to the Rotary Club of home-town Chattanooga. Similar questions came the senator’s way, and he answered in slow, measured sentences that sounded less cautious than the product of serious overnight deliberation.

“I do think there needs to be some radical changes. The president has not yet been able to demonstrate the stability or the competence he needs to demonstrate. … He has not demonstrated that he understands what has made this nation great. … Without the things I just mentioned happening, the nation is going to go through great peril. … We should hope … that he does some self-reflection, does what is necessary to demonstrate some stability, to demonstrate some competence, to demonstrate that he understands the character of our nation. …”

Corker went on: “We’re at the point where there have to be radical changes at the White House itself. It has to happen. I think the president needs to take stock of the role he plays in our nation and move beyond himself.

“We need to speak to what’s good in our nation. Neo-Nazi groups, KKK groups … are not what’s good in our nation. I don’t think that the president has appropriately spoken to the nation on this issue, and sometimes he gets in a situation where he doubles down to try to make a wrong a right. I think he’s done that in this case. I would ask that he take stock of who he is as president of all the people in our nation.”

The world promptly took notice, with CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post in the van and all weighing in yuuge! History may demonstrate that it was Corker’s studied afterthought that stirred the pendulum of change into motion. Or not.

Just as history may yet demonstrate that it was the senator from Tennessee who, at some point in his tenure as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (or as ranking member if the Democrats are to take over the Senate after 2018) played a fundamental role in resolving the seemingly unending Afghanistan quagmire.

The senator issued a statement in a press release following Trump’s televised Monday night address in which the president vowed to keep on keeping on in Afghanistan.

Corker’s statement was as follows:

“I had the opportunity to talk with Secretary Tillerson in advance of this evening’s address, and while I look forward to receiving additional details, I support the direction President Trump laid out tonight for the U.S. role in Afghanistan.

“While there are certainly substantial questions about whether Afghanistan has the capacity over time to provide stable governance to its people, this more focused plan provides the U.S. military with the flexibility it needs to help the Afghan military regain momentum. It also utilizes a conditions-based approach for our military, which should lead to better diplomatic outcomes and ensures engagement with regional partners, especially Pakistan and India, giving us a better opportunity for success.”

I could not help but contrast that seemingly acquiescent statement with Senator Corker’s extended and thoughtful response on the Afghanistan — and Pakistan — matter when I talked with him about it in Washington in 2011. Here is a relevant portion of those remarks:

“I think we’ve known for a long time that Pakistan plays both sides. They’ve been able to get aid from America by being a bad actor. It’s a leverage they use. I just left a Foreign Relations Committee meeting where I talked about this. Whether they’re in cahoots or incompetent, this has been an embarrassment for their country, and it provides a relationship-changing opportunity.

“The fact is, if you travel through Afghanistan, as I’ve done many times, and you talk to our military leaders, they’re unbelievably frustrated, because they’re fighting a war in a country where our enemies are not. And on the other hand we’re providing aid to a country where our enemies are. To me, and this is what I really pressed hard in this last hearing on, this is where our focus needs to be.

“[Pakistan is] where all the Al Qaeda and Taliban leadership [is], their accounting network, they’re all there. … So to me this creates an opportunity for us to bear down on ridding that country of the enemies that we’re fighting in Afghanistan but happen to reside in Pakistan.

“I’ve been very skeptical about the efforts there for some time. … [O]ur men and women in uniform, I hold them in highest esteem in carrying out their mission, but much of what they’re fighting [in Afghanistan] is just criminality. … So much of what our soldiers are fighting there is criminality. Again, the head of the monster, if you will, exists in Pakistan. …”

Nothing said Monday night by Trump or by any of the many respondents to the president’s address, including Corker himself, equals the wisdom of perceptiveness of that 2011 analysis, and there is no reason to believe the senator’s views have changed appreciably.

Meanwhile, here is a fresh view of the matter from another Tennessean, 9th District Congressman Steve Cohen:

“… After 16 years of war, we have not made great progress because there have been issues of corruption in the Afghan government and the Afghan people are ambivalent toward their government and toward the eventual outcome of the war. … My thoughts are with the soldiers who were watching tonight’s speech and their fellow soldiers, some of whom will sacrifice their lives in what is a war without a likelihood of success. God bless our American troops.”

Rep. Cohen’s view is entirely consistent with what Senator Corker said lo, those six years ago, and may yet, in some way or another, have the opportunity to say again. Perhaps, it is often rumored, as a presidential candidate himself.

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot

Tina Fey in Whiskey Tango Foxtrot

Four years after the fall of Saigon, Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now attempted to come to terms with the Vietnam War. Notice I did not say “make sense of,” because Coppola’s goal was to show that very little about Vietnam “made sense.”

As the era of post-9/11 war (hopefully) winds down, we find ourselves again needing to come to terms with insanity. There have been some excellent documentaries about the Bush wars, such as 2007’s No End in Sight, but the treatment of the Iraq war is limited to Clint Eastwood’s militaristic hagiography American Sniper. Afghanistan was the forgotten war, as far as Hollywood is concerned.

Tina Fey is the first to tackle the absurdity of yet another empire trying and failing to impose its will on Afghanistan. In Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, she portrays Kim Baker, a war correspondent based on the real-life Kim Barker, whose book The Taliban Shuffle: Strange Days in Afghanistan and Pakistan served as the jumping-off point for the script, penned by 30 Rock showrunner Robert Carlock. Fey’s Baker is chosen to cover the Afghanistan war, and she leaves her cushy desk job in New York for Kabul.

It’s undeniably fun to ride along with Fey as she dives into what the international press and military types call “The Kabubble.” Whiskey Tango Foxtrot taught me that the Afghanistan war was covered primarily by people with constant, grinding hangovers. The capital is a whirlwind of Champagne-sipping consulate parties, internet porn, and hookahs full of hashish in the media room. The Westerner’s desperate decadence is in sharp contrast to the lives of the locals.

Kim’s confidence is constantly being tested as she gets a ground-level tour of different international flavors of sexism, from the Westerners’ military bravado, to the lecherous Afghan government official played by Alfred Molina, to the conservative Muslim women who are the most fierce defenders of the religious patriarchy. Fey’s assured strength at the center of Whiskey Tango Foxtrot is a double-edged sword, and the episodes where she bears witness to the war’s surreal futility — including a take where a mostly silent Marine general (Billy Bob Thornton) digests the awkward answer to the mystery of why an American-dug village well keeps getting blown up — give way to a focus on her romanic misadventures with Iain and her struggle to advance her journalistic career while the war descends into a stalemate. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot feels like a missed opportunity to use humor to dig deeper into America’s twisted relationship with militarism; the great statement about the legacy of Bush’s bungled wars will have to wait for another day.

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Now playing
Multiple locations

Categories
Film/TV Film/TV/Etc. Blog

Korengal

Korengal (2014; dir. Sebastian Junger)—Here’s the second paragraph from author and former CIA man Ray McGovern’s article “How To Honor Memorial Day,” which was published a couple days ago on Antiwar.com: “First, let’s be clear on at least this much: the 4,500 U.S. troops killed in Iraq—so far—and the 2,350 killed in Afghanistan—so far—did not ‘fall.’ They were wasted on no-win battlefields by politicians and generals—cheered on by neocon pundits and mainstream ‘journalists’—almost none of whom gave a rat’s patootie about the real-life-and-death troops. They were throwaway soldiers.” And here’s what American combat veteran Brendan O’Byrne says to anyone who tells him he shouldn’t feel guilty about his Afghanistan tour because he did what he had to do when he was over there: “I didn’t have to do shit.” O’Byrne is just one of many soft-featured young men with thousand-yard stares and true war stories to tell who were interviewed in Junger’s remarkable sequel to his 2010 documentary Restrepo, which chronicled the daily lives of several soldiers stationed in a remote, hostile and unforgiving Afghan outpost named after a beloved medic killed in action. Restrepo trafficked in immediate, spontaneous, unpredictable wartime experience; Korengal is a more
meditative and complex work that asks for—and often receives—both truth and some measure of reconciliation from its subjects. By giving these men the time and space to articulate and explore their personal codes (“You have to respect the enemy”), their provisional joys (“What’s not to like about a giant machine gun?”) and their ever-present fears (“Damn! Life is getting weird up here…”) Korengal performs an invaluable public service. Their many and varied testimonials wind up saying the same thing all meaningful war memorials say: never forget. Grade: A