Categories
Politics Politics Feature

POLITICS: Something for Everybody

Let’s be optimistic. The new city council may turn out to
be ideally balanced between Memphis’ disparate races, social groups, and special
interests.

Among the outright winners last Thursday night were:

District 4: Wanda Halbert, an African
American and a seasoned school board member whose inner-city concerns will be
balanced with knowledge of mainstream issues;

District 5: Jim Strickland, a lawyer whose
whopping 73 percent total over five opponents gave some indication of the
widespread appeal enjoyed by this white former Democratic chairman (whose law
partner is U.S. attorney David Kustoff, a former GOP chairman).

District 7: Barbara Swearengen Holt-Ware, a
black veteran and firm ally of Mayor Willie Herenton who easily turned
aside an energetic challenge from four opponents.

Super District 8, Position 1: Whether he’s profiting
from the cachet of the former Criminal Court judge and current TV jurist who has
the same name as himself or, alternatively, is just well liked for his stout
attention to inner-city neighborhood concerns, Joe Brown made it back
easily over two opponents.

Super District 8, Position 2: More moderate than her
reputation in some quarters, Janis Fullilove has been a fixture on the
airwaves for almost two decades, and her name ID by itself was enough to
overpower seven well-qualified opponents, including interim incumbent Henry
Hooper
.

Super District 8, Position 3: Myron Lowery, a
hard-working fixture on the council for a generation and a pillar of both
mainstream and minority concerns, had no problem with his two opponents.

Super District 9, Position 1: Scott McCormick,
the likely new chairman, outpolled all other council candidates and prevailed
easily in a battle in which his ex-military opponent made few public
appearances.

Super District 9, Position 2: Shea Flinn,
Democratic son of a Republican county commissioner, outpointed runner-up Kemp
Conrad
, who had GOP support, thanks to his big-bucks campaign, his own
appeal, and an impressive run from “Memphis Watchdog” Joe Saino, who
harvested liberally from Conrad’s conservative base.

Super District 9, Position 3: The winner here was
developer Reid Hedgepeth, whose campaign spent bigtime and had so many
yard signs that Hedgepeth’s campaign manager, retiring councilman Jack
Sammons
, wryly suggested recycling some of them at a late fundraiser.

Though he may have lost some votes to challenger Lester
Lit
, Hedgepeth saw his main competitor, lawyer Desi Franklin, sharing
enough crucial votes with fellow Democrat Mary Wilder to have to
settle for runner-up status.

Still to be determined:

There will be runoffs on November 8 in four district races.

District 1: School board member Stefanie Gatewood,
an M.O.R. black, vies with teacher Bill Morrison in a northern-suburb
district whose demographics now tilt African American. Educators won’t lose
either way.

District 2: The survivors from a multi-candidate
field in this eastern-edge district are, as expected, former assessor and
veteran civic figure Bill Boyd and hard-charging well-supported lawyer
Brian Stephens
, who had the early head start. A tossup.

District 3: Though still youthful, Harold Collins
is a veteran of public service and has much influential support, while teacher
Ike Griffith has some grass-roots strength of his own. Collins is
considered the favorite.

District 6: Another teacher, Edmund Ford
Jr.,
now a graduate student, had a sizeable election-day lead over runner-up
James O. Catchings, himself a well-known educator. It remains to be seen
whether the current legal predicament of Ford pere, who is leaving the
seat, will be a help or a hindrance in the runoff.

  • Wasting no time: Three of the newly elected
    council members – Strickland, Hedgepeth, and Flinn – met Monday for a working
    lunch at The Little Tea Shop, a downtown restaurant.

    The trio compared notes on the campaign and discussed
    issues, agreeing that crime control would be the dominant issue for the newly
    configured council.

    Hedgepeth, a 30-year-old developer and political newcomer,
    took criticism during the campaign for avoiding all the scheduled candidate
    forums. He acknowledged he had relied heavily on the advice of Sammons and
    co-campaign manager Nathan Green. But he quipped, “I’ll be at all the forums
    from now on!”

    Those, he was
    reminded, will be scheduled on Tuesday at regular two-week intervals.

  • Categories
    News The Fly-By

    Fly on the Wall

    Big Heads

    Since the mayoral election is upon us, this seemed like the perfect time to take a walk down memory lane and look at some perfectly ridiculous images of our leading candidates.

    First, there’s Mayor Willie Herenton: Champ or egomaniac, take your pick.

    Herman Morris was serving as president of MLGW when somebody thought it would be a good idea to make a bunch of bobbleheads in his likeness. In retrospect, it probably wasn’t.

    FOXFunnies, the online creation of former Fox newsman Darrell Phillips, gave Memphians this rather boring likeness of Carol Chumney. If you visit the Web site, however, you can control Chumney’s “blink rate,” a truly satisfying endeavor.

    And then there’s John Willingham, who appeared shirtless in the Flyer shortly after auctioning his pacemaker on eBay. This time, we’ll spare you.

    So there you have it: big head, bobblehead, blinking head, and John Willingham. This really could have been Prince Mongo’s year.

    Skirting the Issue

    On Sunday, September 23rd, The Commercial Appeal ran a media column considering the potentially bleak outlook for women’s magazines. “Are women’s magazines obsolete?” McClatchy reporter Rachel Leibrock asked in “Whither the Women’s Mag,” a eulogy to Jane, a glossy girlcentric periodical that called it quits in July. In related news, the CA officially launches Skirt, a women’s magazine, later this week.

    Categories
    Politics Politics Feature

    Council Candidate Lit Blasts Absent Opponent Hedgepeth

    There have been many, many forums so far, involving
    candidates for mayor and the various city council positions.

    Almost all of them follow the same formula: opening
    statements, policy positions stated in response to generalized questions in
    specific subject areas like crime, education, economic development, than a
    standard vote-for-me close.

    Retired businessman Lester Lit broke new ground at a League
    of Women Voters forum for District 9 candidates Monday night. Not only did Lit,
    a candidate for District 9, Position 3, criticize an opponent at length and by
    name, he used the entirety of his opening and closing statement time to do so.

    Lit devoted his one-minute opening time to an attack on
    Reid Hedgepeth as lacking qualifications to serve. Then, flanked by fellow 9, 3
    candidates Mary Wilder, Desi Franklin, and Boris Combest, Lit used the
    two-minute period allotted him for a closing statement to say this:

    “…There really is an 800-pound gorilla in this room, and
    he’s not here tonight. His name is Reid Hedgepeth, and I’m going to tell you
    right now, with the backing that young man has, he could very well win this
    election, and that upsets me. I’m mad as hell to think that he could, because we
    have four very qualified candidates on this panel here tonight, and I’d feel
    very good if any of the four could serve as your representative on the next city
    council. I would not feel too happy if Reid Hedgepeth serves as my representative
    on the City Council.

    “He has been to no forums. He has been to no neighborhood
    associations. He is maintaining his campaign strictly with a hundred-thousand
    dollar budget on TV and slick mailers that he sends out, such as this one right
    here [brandishing a mailout flyer], which is — this is not even a picture
    of Memphis — this is Detroit that they’re using pictures of to mislead you…. Y’all
    were nice enough to come out this evening to try to learn about the candidates.
    I think you need to go one step further and educate yourself about the missing
    candidate, the one that I’m afraid could steal this election because of
    financial backing that he has.

    “I forgot to mention in my opening that not only has he
    never voted in a city council race in his life, he also made two separate
    donations to Rickey Peete two years after the last city election. So you do
    your homework. If you want to vote for one of us, you’ll get a good council
    person. Let’s not make any more mistakes. We’ve had enough mistakes. Let’s not go down that road anymore.”

    Categories
    Politics Politics Feature

    No-Shows

    By now, with early voting under way and scarcely two weeks to go before Election Day itself, it is apparent — even to the extreme Pollyanna types among us — that Mayor Willie Herenton will not be aiding the voters (or his opponents) by participating in any multi-candidate forums.

    That’s unless you count the two times he has appeared in series with his three major adversaries — City Council member Carol Chumney, former MLGW head Herman Morris, and former Shelby County commissioner John Willingham.

    The first of those occasions occurred several weeks back when the mayor deigned to appear — separately, as did the others — before a public evaluation session of the Coalition for a Better Memphis, answering the same set of policy questions as his opponents. He was third in line for that event and, coincidentally or not, also finished third in the coalition’s ultimate numerical evaluations (behind Morris and Chumney, in that order).

    Only last week, Herenton made another partial concession to the forum concept when, at Homebuilders on Germantown Parkway, he deigned, albeit briefly, to sit on the same stage as his three main contenders at an event put on by the Cordova Neighborhood Association. Speaking first, he itemized his dogs and ponies and then left, leaving Chumney to chastise him for not staying to “answer questions” and Morris and Willingham to do similar tut-tutting.

    Actually, the format of the evening, which also featured candidates in several council districts, did not permit questions, nor, ipso facto, did it allow for answers.

    Herenton next had an opportunity for some joint Q&A action on Sunday, when he, the other mayoral candidates, and aspirants for various council seats were invited to appear at an event sponsored by the Central Gardens Neighborhood Association at Idlewild School.

    His Honor had accepted the association’s invite, but he opted out when he learned he would not be able, as at the two prior events, to speak his two-cents’ worth and then depart but would be expected to stick around with the others to field questions — including some from the audience and from children at three neighborhood schools and, potentially at least, from his opponents.

    As it happened, the Central Gardens folks excluded several candidates who had not completed the association’s fairly extensive questionnaire on issues before a deadline had passed. As a result, both Chumney and Willingham, along with various council candidates, found themselves on the outside looking in, having to settle for passing out their campaign literature to arriving attendees.

    Among mayoral contenders, only Morris and the inimitable Laura Davis Aaron were empanelled. Morris, who — buoyed by a fresh endorsement from The Commercial Appeal — seems to be enjoying something of a late rise, performed well, and Aaron, whose persona has sometimes seemed to be an SNL improvisation, outdid herself with a dire warning — Grim Reaper-like, given the presence of the student corps — that children educated in the public schools, unlike their home-schooled counterparts, would die.

    Jackson Baker

    A rare group sighting: the top four mayoral candidates in Cordova

    (It was some consolation that “Dr.” Aaron, who claims to receive visions from God, did not say when.)

    One of the questions directed at the field of candidates concerned their attitude toward those of their opponents who had spurned the opportunity to come forth. Predictably, the absent Herenton drew barbs from Morris and others — as did incumbent District 8, Position 1 councilman Joe Brown from opponent Ian Randolph, who has picked up some good late support in various quarters.

    Brown has indeed been a no-show at the campaign year’s public forums and other collective events, whether or not his reason is what Randolph alleges it is — to exploit voter confusion of himself with the other Joe Brown, the former Criminal Court judge who now holds court on syndicated national television.

    The other main target of complaints concerning his chronic abseentism from public scrutiny was Reid Hedgepeth, a political newcomer who is seeking election to the District 9, Position 3 seat being vacated by council veteran Jack Sammons and who has stout support from Sammons, FedEx founder Fred Smith, and other influential Memphians.

    Hedgepeth’s support group also includes the first-time candidate’s fellow developers, or so alleges opponent Lester Lit, a retired businessman who makes that charge in a radio ad now running and who verbally blistered Hedgepeth on Sunday for consistently making himself scarce.

    “Vote for me or Desi [Franklin] or Mary [Wilder]” was Lit’s generous advice to attendees at the Central Gardens forum. (Both Franklin and Wilder, who also seek the District 9, Position 3 seat, were present, as they, like Lit, have been for other candidate forums this year.)

    Hedgepeth is a special case. Unlike Brown, who maintains his own North Memphis community center for constituents, and unlike Herenton, who has been the cynosure at several mass rallies in the inner city and who has made selected drop-in appearances elsewhere, Hedgepeth has, by apparent design, been the subject of few public sightings.

    Sammons, who by general acknowledgement is directing the Hedgepeth campaign, pooh-poohs the necessity of his protégé’s making appearances at forums and other such events. “He needs to be out where the people are,” said the retiring councilman on the occasion of the recent opening of Hedgepeth’s Park Place campaign headquarters.

    And that, Sammons went on, passing his hand over a wall map, meant concentrating on door-to-door canvassing. It should be said that there are skeptics in other candidates’ camps who doubt that Hedgepeth is doing much door-to-door, either. What is incontestable is that Hedgepeth has beaucoup campaign signs — including what would seem to be scores of large wooden ones — all over District 9 and, for that matter, in adjoining areas, both inside and outside the city.

    And this week saw the appearance of a TV spot in which the 30-year-old former University of Memphis tight end appears both personable and focused and promises, once in office, to be the source of “straight talk” and “practical solutions.”

    Meanwhile, it would seem, voters will have to do without much of either. Hedgepeth’s highly packaged and well-financed campaign so far has distinct resemblances to the election efforts of Nikki Tinker, a repeat candidate for the 9th District congressional seat who, in both 2006 and in the campaign she has already launched for 2008, has eschewed much in the way of policy statements and whose public appearances are highly controlled. She too, like Hedgepeth, has relied heavily on direct mail, visible campaign paraphernalia, and expensively produced media.

    Whether coincidentally or not, both Hedgepeth and Tinker also reportedly have stout support in local corporate circles.

    None of that conclusively demonstrates anything, for better or worse, about the potential of either candidate in office, but it is the kind of outward, detached manifestation that Joe Saino, a candidate for District 9, Position 2, had in mind on Sunday at the Central Gardens forum when — almost in the manner of ’60s balladeer Joe South — he denounced the prevalence of “signs, signs, signs.”

    But even Saino, a retired businessman and public official best known these days for his muckraking blog efforts at memphiswatchdog.org, has his signs out. They all do. On the day after Election Day we’ll see which ones were omens and which just turned out to be litter.

    Next week: the Flyer‘s pre-election issue

    Categories
    Politics Politics Feature

    POLITICS: In the Spotlight

    There come times when you wonder why everyone isn’t a
    political junkie. Last year’s nail-biting U.S. Senate race between winner Bob
    Corker
    and (narrow) loser Harold Ford Jr. – climaxing with the now
    famous Battle of Wilson Air, when the GOP’s Corker deftly out dueled Democrat
    Ford at the latter’s ambush of a Corker press conference — was one such time.

    Another, believe it or not, is this year’s Memphis mayoral
    race, which — despite the opting out of one potential lead actor, Shelby
    County Mayor A C Wharton, and the refusal of another, incumbent Memphis
    mayor Willie Herenton, to play ensemble – has had its dramatic, as well
    as its comedic, moments.

    Much of the entertainment value has come, as expected, from
    the scramble involving the three major contenders to Herenton – city
    councilwoman Carol Chumney, former MLGW head Herman Morris, and
    former Shelby County Commissioner John Willingham. We’ll get to that core
    drama in a moment.

    But besides this main plot, which some have called by the
    shorthand initials A.B.H. (for “Anybody-but-Herenton”), there’s running
    mini-drama involving the several supporting players in the 14-member mayoral
    field. We can call that one A.G.H. – for “Ain’t Gonna Happen.”

    For, if there is real doubt as to whether Willingham, whom
    the polls have shown to be hovering in the low single digits, is delusional in
    his hopes of winning, it’s a dead-level cinch that these others are. None of
    them even blip the radar screen.

    Which is not to say that they haven’t made their
    contribution to the dialogue. Nor that they haven’t made for compelling theater
    on those rare occasions when they’ve been admitted to a forum involving the Big
    Three (as for the Big Unit himself, the incumbent mayor, fahgitaboutit!, he’s
    made it clear he’s not about to show in tandem with the others).

    Consider this piece of wisdom from Laura Davis Aaron,
    delivered at the League of Women Voters’ omnium gatherum affair at the
    Main Library on Poplar on Sunday:

    Knowing what she was about to unleash, Aaron first issued
    this full-disclosure caveat to the attending audience (fairly numerous, all
    things considered): “I want you close your eyes for a minute. I wanted to be a
    lawyer once, but they ran out of the courtroom.” Non sequitur or not, we got the
    drift of that. Then came the moment she was preparing us for:

    “God gave me a plan and a vison: “Dr. Aaron, you must put
    senior citizens in The Pyramid!'” (Pause.) “And I said: ‘To do what?'”

    Once again the voice of the Almighty: “‘Take what they’ve
    got in their homes to the Pyramid. and you’re gonna have them run a flea
    market
    in that Pyramid!'”

    And that, mind you, was only the first of two instances of
    divine intervention at Sunday’s forum. Aaron was followed minutes later by
    fellow candidate Dewayne A. Jones, who proclaimed more modestly, “God
    makes the leader. I am your David,” and promised at some point to bring
    forth his own “vision of empowerment.” He may even have had it ready on Sunday,
    but wisely decided to hold it in reserve after Aaron’s bombshell.

    There were contributions of a more secular sort from the
    candidate chorus on Sunday. Roosevelt Jamison, in particular, proved
    himself something of a phrasemaker. At one point, the youthful-appearing
    Jamison, a Desert Storm vet, said disarmingly to the crowd, “I know I don’t
    look
    old, but I am old.”

    And he certainly got his fellow also-rans on his side when
    he complained that “the media isn’t playing with a full deck” – meaning that he
    and the other unsung names on the mayoral ballot weren’t getting their proper
    share of attention.

    The line from Jamison that got the whole audience going,
    though, was this zinger, in response to the issue of gang activity and what to
    do about it: “”We need to stop the gangs on top!” — a clear reference to
    the rascals in charge of the governmental and business status quo.

    Jamison was not done. He went on to insist, “Our government
    has corrupted us in our city,” designating as particular problems “welfare” and
    “babies having babies.” He got murmurs of approval from the conservatives in the
    audience when he said, “We need mens [sic] to stand up to be mens. Stop leaving
    everything to our women!”

    Then there was Randy Cagle, who embraced past
    traditions as well, calling, among other things, for a return to corporal
    punishment in the schools. As he pointed out, “I got busted a lot of times at
    school, but I’m not dead.”

    Businessman Cagle, who has made every forum so far to which
    all mayoral candidates have been invited, obviously relished the attention.
    Often Cagle was gently corralled by a hint from LWV moderator Danielle
    Schonbaum
    that he was about to exceed his allotted time limit.

    On one such occasion, he said the obvious: “I could go on
    forever. I love it.”

    As candid and direct as that remark of Cagle’s was in its
    own right, it had the ancillary virtue of prompting a rare understatement from
    the famously voluble Willingham. “I’m like Cagle,” said the former commissioner.
    “I can talk to you for three hours.”

    Three hours was not quite what Willingham and fellow
    top-tier candidates Morris and Chumney enjoyed during Monday night’s prime-time
    broadcast forum on News Channel 3, WREG-TV, but the three of them managed a
    compelling hour.

    Observers’ opinions differed afterward as to who came out
    ahead in a format that culminated with direct exchanges between the candidates
    themselves.

    But there were several discoveries to be had by the
    viewers, who learned, among other things, that Chumney has been endorsed by the
    AFL-CIO (she mentioned the fact four, maybe five times) and that Willingham, who
    would seem to be about as white as white can be (ditto for his supporters),
    considers himself the exponent, first and foremost, of “my base in the black
    community,” which he helpfully enumerated as being in the vicinity of 13,000
    voters.

    Cynics may dispute it all they want, but the former
    commissioner made it clear several times in his opening statement and thereafter
    that he thinks of himself as the candidate of black Memphians. Willingham also
    made the claim that his commission race of 2002, which resulted in an upset
    victory over then incumbent Morris Fair, had been but a trial run for the
    two mayoral races he’s run since (three, counting one for county mayor last
    year).

    He had run back then, Willingham confided, “to get my name
    out.”

    Whatever.

    More to the point, he certainly got his name out Monday
    night, sparring with the other two candidates (and occasionally, lightly, with
    moderators Claudia Barr and Richard Ransom) and discoursing on
    several of his pet schemes, two of which – converting the Fairgrounds into a
    mini-Olympic village for international competitions and reserving desk jobs in
    the Memphis Police Department for returning vets of the Iraq war – were
    distinctly original.

    In WREG’s own post-debate viewer poll, Willingham was, in
    fact, running a strong second to Chumney.

    As for the councilwoman, she had boasted on air – as she
    has every right to – that such scientific polls as have been taken all position
    her at the lead of the mayoral pack or tied for it. That was the basis for her
    no-thank-you answer to commentator Norm Brewer‘s first question, asking
    all the candidates if they shouldn’t back out, making room for a single
    consensus contender to take on Herenton, who remains a not-quite-prohibitive
    favorite.

    (No one else volunteered for self-sacrifice, either.)

    Though occasionally lapsing into some repetitive-sounding
    spin, Chumney certainly managed to seize her share of the spotlight and to get
    out large chunks of her crime plan (also available on her Web site) and other
    proposals.

    Morris, too, had his moments, staking out his claim to be a
    racial uniter and unflappably fending off his opponents’ attacks on his record
    at MLGW (Chumney on the alleged V.I.P. list he’d kept while head of the utility
    and Willingham on what he – but not Morris, still a true believer – saw as the
    folly of investing in Memphis Networx).

    With some logic, Morris could claim afterwards that the
    others’ persistent questioning of him meant that they must have regarded him as
    “the frontrunner.” He wishes.

    The bottom line is that all three candidates handled
    themselves well and did themselves no damage, as each continued to vie for the
    right to be regarded as the main contender to Herenton.

    To Be Continued, you may be sure.

    Categories
    Politics Politics Feature

    MAD AS HELL: Ye Olde GOP Presidential Players

    The hallmark of this president will undoubtably be the
    Iraq war; however the influence of Karl Rove with his powerful Svengali job as
    casting agent and director for the George W. Bush Show will loom large. Over
    the last six years, America has been a willing participant in a reality show
    created by Republicans called Let’s Pretend. Thematically, this is the
    message: “I will pretend to tell you the truth, if you will pretend to believe
    it.”

    When it comes to acting, Dubya is a rookie, but you’ve
    got to hand it to him —- the guy is one hell of a performer. After all, it
    can’t be easy playing Goober Pyle, Howdy Doody, and Forrest Gump
    simultaneously. Until now, the sunny performances by Ronald Reagan on the show
    I’m Not a President but I Play One on TV
    have ranked tops among
    Republicans, but the acting skills of George the Forty-Third have put old
    Ronnie to shame.

    Cheney, Condi, and Rummy, the co-producers of this
    mendacious melange, have a flair for the dramatic as well. Their formula has
    been brilliant: Take Lost in Space, cross it with some Green Acres,
    and lace it with just the right amounts of Combat and Rawhide
    to create a new version of Groundhog Day. What a masterful stroke of genius it
    was to make the media part of the cast. When it came to the thespian talents
    of the working stiffs at the networks and 24 -hour cable channels, who knew?

    Stage doors will soon be shutting for our Witless Wonder
    but those amusement loving Republicans have nothing to fear – Fred Thompson is
    waiting in the wings. Thompson, a bona fide B- lister in Hollywood rolled out
    his candidacy this week by keeping all the razzle-dazzle so cherished by his
    party. Not one to disappoint, Ready Freddy kicked off his campaign on The
    Tonight Show
    with Jay Leno.

    The role of Candidate is a reprise of one of Thompson’s
    earlier portrayals, but in case you missed it, this is the synopsis: Southern
    Lawyer turned Washington Senator/actor/lobbyist drawls his way through America
    using warmed-over Reagan anecdotes to tout Dixie-fried conservative values.
    Folksy speeches that don’t really say anything but are punctuated with the
    benefits of war, a devotion to God, and the love of freedom stir the crowds of
    the saved and self-righteous. Winking and smiling, Thompson is assuring
    nervous neo-cons that he’s their man and will continue on with the Bush
    charade of pretending to tell us the truth, so we can continue to pretend to
    believe it.

    With rank hypocrisy, Republicans love to condemn the
    mythical Hollywood life style and claim it to be the epitome of hedonism
    represented only by Democrats. Yet Republicans are the ones with a penchant
    for electing real actors — candidates whose multiple marriages, secret
    lovers, and closeted sexcapades more accurately reflect Hollywood values. In
    the days ahead, it will be interesting to see if Mr. Law-‘n-Order can cast his
    actor’s spell over Republican voters.

    On the other hand: Surely, the time has come for people
    to consider electing a President who is genuinely more interested in winning
    the Nobel Prize for Peace than the Academy Award for Acting.

    Categories
    Cover Feature News

    A New Direction

    There is a reason why you have to get out and about to see how things are going with this or that City Council candidate in the 2007 city election. Looking at financial disclosures is one thing, getting good word-of-mouth is another, checking out endorsement lists and the helpful voter guide prepared by the Coalition for a Better Memphis is yet a third. These are helpful indicators to the analyst, in a way that, say, position papers (which any self-respecting undergraduate can cook up) aren’t.

    But the best tool of all is the eyeball. Two cases in point: The race for District 9, Position 2, seemed at first a classic showdown between two seasoned but youngish candidates — Kemp Conrad and Shea Flinn — but all it took was one look-see at a mid-city meet-and-greet for the even more youthful political newcomer Frank Langston (a packed wall-to-wall affair transcending various political and civic lines) to understand that he, too, had to be considered a player.

    Yard signs can tell a tale, too. When retired businessman Lester Lit, who warmed up for his District 8 council bid with an unsuccessful County Commission race last year, told me he’d gone door to door and had located a yard sign at the home of someone I knew on Kirby Parkway, I drove by the next day to take a look. To my astonishment, every other yard on that well-traveled, posh thoroughfare seemed to bear a Lit sign.

    Clearly, Lit has learned a lot about campaigning, is working hard (he’s dropped 40 pounds in the process of running!), and must be ranked among the most serious candidates this year.

    Indeed, the makers of yard signs and vendors of billboard space seem to be thriving this year, as several candidates in an unusually wide-open election year are unbuttoning their pocketbooks and visibly rolling the dice. Another sign of their avidity will be the deluge of mailed materials Memphians can expect at their houses in this post-Labor Day stretch-drive period — with scarcely two weeks to go before the start of early voting on September 14th and less than a month until Election Day itself on October 4th.

    And, though most of the television advertising you’ll see will be by mayoral candidates, not a few council candidates — particularly in the six “super district” races — are taking to the airwaves, too.

    What’s at stake for council candidates is the opportunity to be on the ground floor of a new era in city government, with a majority of council incumbents eschewing a race for reelection and others in jeopardy. Whoever ends up being elected mayor will be faced with a virtually recast council, steeped in voter outrage over incidences of corruption, fiscal strains, and a panoply of vexing urban problems.

    On the plus side, this year’s crop seems for the most part to have done its homework, and most are realistic and ready to go to work on issues like de facto consolidation, charter change, and what to do about the Fairgrounds, the riverfront, and other problem areas.

    Here’s a thumbnail look at the races as of now. And don’t worry too much about possible oversights and premature judgments: The outlook in these contests will be continually chronicled, amended, and accounted for in weekly coverage, on the Flyer Web site, and in a final pre-election issue.

    District 1: For decades this district, spanning the city’s far-northern wards from Frayser to Cordova, has been the bailiwick of white, independent-minded working-class types — the retiring E.C. Jones, a hound for constituent service, being a case in point. Demographics, though, have evolved, and two of the three leading candidates are African-American.

    The early leader has been Stephanie Gatewood, who is well financed and supported and has represented the district for two terms on the school board. She faces fairly stout challenges from firefighter Antonio “2 Shay” Parkinson, a former Music Commission chairman who has a reasonably diverse base of support, and from Bill Morrison, a teacher who was the Democratic nominee last year against Republican incumbent Marsha Blackburn.

    As a measure of the demographic sea-change, Morrison is the only white candidate.

    Among other candidates, Jesse Jeff and Riesel Sandridge have some name identification from prior efforts, and W.B. Bates II, Rudolph Daniels II, and Keith Ferguson have all mounted efforts. Ferguson in particular generated some early e-mail activity but seems to have flagged of late.

    Gatewood hopes to hit the magic figure of 51 percent to avoid a runoff.

    District 2: Comprising the city’s ever-expanding eastern edge, this district is white-dominated and suburban in outlook. Though there are several impressive African-American candidates running, the race is generally considered a two-man affair between political veteran Bill Boyd and relative newcomer Brian Stephens, both white.

    Businessman Stephens got off to an early start, a fact which helped him stabilize after Boyd, a former assessor and longtime political activist, drew on his numerous connections to get the Republican Party’s endorsement, a coveted commodity in this district.

    Of the black candidates in the race, Ivon Faulkner is an impressive campaigner with name identification from previous races; Georgia Cannon is well known and well regarded as a result of a banking career and her many civic involvements; and Karen Camper, a military veteran, has run a poised campaign.

    Other candidates are Daryl Benson, Daniel Price, Todd Gilreath, and Scott Pearce, the latter of whom has generated a fair amount of yard-sign activity in the eastern precincts.

    District 3: This is one of two districts in which low-profile incumbents face stiff challenges from opponents who may be better known.

    The officeholder here is Madeleine Cooper Taylor, who had enough community standing — mainly from her work in medical auxiliary circles and with the NAACP — to earn an interim appointment last year to succeed TaJuan Stout Mitchell. But she has hardly been active enough since to become a household name, while Harold Collins, a seasoned local-government hand employed now in the district attorney’s office, has long association with both Memphis mayor Willie Herenton and Shelby County mayor A C Wharton, the latter of whom has gone public with his support of Collins.

    Two other candidates — Memphis city schools video maven Ike Griffith and education entrepreneur Coleman Thompson — have a fair degree of name identification from previous races and could contend. Others running are Albert Banks III, Davida Cruthird, Jerome Payne, and Ronald Peterson.

    District 4: Longtime school-board stalwart Wanda Halbert was overmatched in her Democratic primary race for Juvenile Court clerk last year against Shep Wilbun, but her name recognition and degree of support are far greater than those of opponent Johnny Hatcher, who has run for various offices before but never as a true contender.

    District 5: This Midtown-East Memphis district has been the province for the last four years of mayoral contender Carol Chumney, and one of Chumney’s opponents from the 2003 race, lawyer and former local Democratic chairman Jim Strickland, has basically been running for the seat ever since, amassing a generous war chest and across-the-board political support while easily establishing himself as the odds-on favorite.

    Of his five opponents, two — Jeff Bailey and Kerry Rogers — have been fairly inactive, though Bailey made a serious effort to introduce himself, at least to media outlets, early on. By general consent, Strickland’s chief challenger is environmental activist Bob Schreiber, who — largely using his own money — has made a genuine effort to be competitive with yard signs (riskily identifying him merely as “Bob”) and other campaign paraphernalia.

    Though widely respected, Schreiber has so far seemed uncomfortable in the spotlight — something that can’t be said about another activist candidate, Denise Parkinson, who has been a leading figure in the citizen effort to save Libertyland and who is as outgoing as Schreiber is (or seems to be) private and withdrawn. Unlike Strickland and Schreiber, however, Parkinson seems financially limited in her ability to mount a visible campaign.

    Though he has generated relatively little attention so far, lawyer Richard Parks, who ran unsuccessfully last year for a judgeship, seemed relaxed and forthcoming at the lone District 5 forum to date, as did Parkinson and Strickland. As indicated, Schreiber hasn’t yet gotten his legs in that kind of environment.

    For what it’s worth, there would seem to be a healthy streak of public-sector populism running throughout the District 5 candidate field. With a cumulative score of 92, Strickland had the second-highest ranking overall in scoring by the Coalition for a Better Memphis.

    District 6: Several of the district races seem destined for runoffs, but none more so than this one, held by an incumbent, Edmund Ford, who went in roughly a year’s time from being a fairly nondescript council member to being one of the most controversial, if not disliked, members of all time. Indicted twice and observed by the public in a bug-eyed apoplectic state several times during that time frame, Ford is bowing out — but only from his reelection race.

    The incumbent’s son, candidate Edmund Ford Jr., is a more soft-spoken, even eloquent specimen, but his father’s notoriety makes it unlikely that he’ll win outright. A host of other candidates, several of them impressive, are contesting the issue.

    There is former school board member Ed Vaughn, hopeful of mounting a political comeback. There are impressive newcomers like educator James O. Catchings and South Memphis Alliance president Reginald Milton. There are former candidates with still uncooked seeds, like Clifford Lewis and Perry Bond and Alicia Howard. And there are relative unknowns, like Charles Etta Chavez (that’s a she!), Jesse Chism, Philmore Epps Jr., and Willie H. Justice III.

    District 7: Incumbent Barbara Swearengen Holt-Ware may have changed her name in the last year (by marriage), but she hasn’t changed her nose-to-the-grindstone profile on the council — one that will doubtless assure a fairly easy reelection.

    For the record, though, she has three opponents: Veronica Sherfield Castillo, Preston T. Poindexter, and Derek D. Richardson. Castillo has managed to impress several observers, Poindexter has something of a following in Frayser, and Richardson is virtually unknown. All of them face long, long odds.

    Super Districts 8 and 9: When the late U.S. district judge Jerome Turner was faced years ago with resolving a series of racial-discrimination suits, he worked in Solomonic mode, often splitting the difference between plaintiffs and defendants in unexpected ways. His way of resolving a suit regarding council districts was typical. Abolishing six city-wide at-large districts, he created in their place District 8, a majority-black “super district,” and District 9, which was majority-white. Each of the two new super-districts elected three representatives.

    A proviso of the new arrangement was that, unlike the case of the seven regular districts, which employed runoffs when no candidate owned a simple majority, outcomes in the six super-district races would be winner-take-all. That same “no-runoff” provision also applies to citywide voting for mayor and city clerk.

    The irony is that a methodology that was meant to buttress the rights of the original African-American plaintiffs has, with the passage of time and demographic change, come to offer the same advantages to what is now a city-wide white — not black — minority.

    That’s sort of what outgoing councilman Dedrick Brittenum was driving at recently, when he suggested that the terms “majority” and “minority” be eliminated as descriptive phrases for legal purposes.

    For the time being, anyhow, the system holds.

    District 8, Position 1: This position, currently held by Joe Brown, is likely to stay that way, despite the incumbent’s penchant for over-the-edge public discourse (sometimes rivaling that of colleague Ford). Brown kicked up an international furor in 2004 when, serving as council chairman, he denied a visiting Iraqi government delegation entrance to City Hall on grounds that they might be a security threat.

    A street populist of sorts, with roots in neighborhood organizations, sanitation entrepreneur Brown is, perhaps appropriately, chairman of the council’s committee on public services and neighborhoods. Though he has a following of his own, he no doubt profits from having the same name as the former Memphis Criminal Court judge who now reigns over the airwaves as a TV jurist. And, for that or whatever other reason, he has eschewed appearing in public forums with his opponents or other council candidates.

    The two other candidates for Position 1 are Tiffany Lowe and Ian Randolph. Lowe, a family service counselor, has made virtue of necessity, boasting of her redemption from gang associations of her past that included several arrests and convictions, while Randolph, a financial adviser and former president of the Annesdale-Snowden neighborhood association, has demonstrated a penchant at public forums for arranging his responses to issues in orderly capsule form — or “bullets,” as he calls them.

    Each is making a strong effort with hopes, probably remote, of catching up with Brown.

    District 8, Position 2: When longtime incumbent Rickey Peete resigned his council seat to focus on his defense on a second bribery and extortion charge (he was convicted of such a charge during a previous council stint in 1988), his council mates appointed in his stead Henry Hooper, an insurance executive with a serious mien and a past as a secret service agent. As council chairman Tom Marshall wished out loud at the time, Hooper might strike the public as Peete’s opposite, image-wise.

    Hooper has proved, as advertised, a dignified presence — maybe, in his slow, deliberate way of speaking, too much of one. But he promptly suffered an embarrassment of his own when it was revealed he was the subject of an IRS lien of nearly half a million dollars.

    In any case, his incumbency has not been conspicuous enough to forestall a host of opponents, the best known of whom is Janis Fullilove, currently a Charter Commission member and a radio talk-show host of some years’ standing. Fullilove, who may be regarded as a slight favorite in the race, was for better and for worse the personal choice of the disgraced but popular Peete.

    Another hopeful, expected to vie for the lead with Hooper and Fullilove, is Trennie Williams, a poised ex-Marine who runs the family-owned newspaper Silver Star News. Williams, whose voter base is Orange Mound, has performed well in public forums so far.

    Another candidate who has been much in the news is 18-year-old George Monger, a precociously informed college freshman at Southwest Tennessee Community College whose extreme youth has been his major calling card. Other candidates are Matthew Jordan, Derrick Lanois, Brian L. Saulsberry, and David W. Vinciarelli, the latter being the lone white candidate in the race.

    On the evaluation scale of the Coalition for a Better Memphis, Williams leads Fullilove and Hooper in that order, though these and three other candidates — Lanois, Monger, and Vinciarelli — are closely clustered.

    District 8, Position 3: Poor Del Gill. You can’t fault the well-known maverick Democrat and perennial candidate for trying, but this time he’s up against an even more formidable opponent than usual — longtime incumbent Myron Lowery, who chairs three council committees and is a member of the Charter Commission besides. Well-known and highly respected, Lowery has as good a chance of any council candidate of leading this year’s election ticket. (City clerk Thomas Long, who gets to run citywide, will probably end up the top vote-getter, though.)

    It is sometimes said of Gill, who is bright but highly abrasive, that he might not win even if his name was the only one on the ballot for a given position. The predicament of Lowery’s other opponent, Toni Strong, is quite different. Though president of the South Memphis Neighborhood Association and a good performer in the candidate forums so far, she is still relatively little known district-wide. In any case, Lowery, whose campaign organization is well-funded and well-oiled, is in little danger of being bested.

    District 9, Position 1: Businessman Scott McCormick, an activist member of an activist family and chairman of the council’s parks committee, has been one of the council’s pivotal members in his two terms so far. He has often proved to be a consensus builder and, more than most council members, has been willing to line up with maverick colleague Chumney, as when the two of them took the lead in repealing the city’s easy-exit pension formula requiring only 12 years of service.

    Even with a name opponent, McCormick’s prospects for easy reelection would be good, but Cecil Hale, a former private contractor in Iraq who ran for Congress last year in the Republican primary, has been largely AWOL from public events and has engaged in little visible campaigning.

    Expect a slam dunk for the incumbent.

     

    District 9, Position 2: At the outset, this race looked, as mentioned above, like a showdown between two youngish politicians — former Republican chairman Kemp Conrad and former interim state senator Shea Flinn, a Democrat. Both are well-connected in local political and business circles and have varying degrees of bipartisan support. Conrad, who, as the GOP’s helmsman, seemed serious about outreach to African Americans, has enjoyed close ties in the past with Mayor Herenton and with the mayor’s son Rodney. He is the Republican Party’s endorsee but can also boast support from such centrist Democrats as power lawyer John Farris and Shelby County commissioner J.W. Gibson.

    When Conrad wondered of someone recently what kind of equivalent support Flinn had across party lines, the answer he got was short and succinct: George Flinn, the candidate’s father and a GOP member of the county commission. The senior Flinn, a well-heeled radiologist and broadcast magnate, is no passive onlooker. And the junior Flinn, for that matter, proved during his brief service in the legislature this year that he could build bridges to his counterparts across the aisle.

    From the beginning, as now, it has seemed obvious that Memphis Watchdog blogger Joe Saino, an inveterate scourge of corruption and politics as usual, would be a figure to reckon with, bringing his prodigious research on public issues into the balance.

    What nobody seemed to conjure with at first was the impact of the 23-year-old Frank Langston, member of a local entrepreneurial family and an activist in a variety of causes who has generated some impressive across-the-board support of his own. Starting out almost unnoticed, he has become a bona fide contender and his very presence in the race has blunted the others’ expectations to some degree — opinions differing as to whether Conrad or Flinn will be more affected.

    Joe Baier, a disafffected scourge in his own right, has support among conservative voters, as does Saino. Though listed on the ballot, James Lochbihler, a firefighter, is not actively campaigning. Ranking by the Coalition for a Better Memphis shows Conrad, Langston, and Flinn in that fairly clustered order.

    District 9, Position3: This race had, very early on, looked like a free ride for newcomer Reid Hedgepeth, who had avowed support from the outgoing councilman, Jack Sammons, as well as from FedEx founder Fred Smith. When developer Hedgepeth won the endorsement of the Shelby County Republican Party on top of that, his way home seemed even clearer — especially since the partisan facts of life suggested that Democratic activist Desi Franklin would be his major opponent.

    And Franklin, as it happened, was having to deal with competition from two other established Democrats — Vollintine-Evergreen activist Mary Wilder, who just completed an interim term as state House representative, and Boris Combest, a party executive committee member with roots in the African-American community.

    But that preliminary reckoning yielded to several other realities — among them, the vigorous and well-funded campaign efforts of both Franklin and, as indicated above, the aforementioned Lester Lit, whose Poplar corridor and East Memphis inroads are much more likely to come at the expense of Hedgepeth than of anyone else.

    Franklin still has much to worry about from Wilder, whose neighborhood clout will be buttressed and extended by the grunt work of the indefatigable David Upton, spinmaster and G.O.T.V. guru par excellence and Franklin’s dedicated rival among Democratic power brokers. The hard-working Combest is more of an unknown quantity, and both he and Wilder will be hurting for funds in comparison with Franklin, who can number Republican patriarch Lewis Donelson, the venerable senior member of her law firm, among her adherents.

    And not to be ignored is Lit. Like Langston in the Position 2 race, he has graduated from spoiler to contender.

    Franklin, by the way, boasts the highest rating of all candidates, a cumulative 93, in evaluations by the Coalition for a Better Memphis.

    Categories
    Politics Politics Feature

    Forum Fever

    Forums are all the rage these days as Labor Day approaches — after which the crowded 2007 pre-election calendar starts to overflow big-time.

    Among the events to watch are two forthcoming candidate debates co-sponsored by the Flyer and the Memphis Rotary Club. On September 4th, candidates for the hotly contested District 9, Position 2 seat will square off, and one week later the major mayoral candidates will have at it. Both events are at noon at the Cook Convention Center.

    Having thus done my duty by our own events, I must next tip the hat to the Coalition for a Better Memphis, which actually succeeded in getting all four major mayoral hopefuls — including the debate-leery Mayor Willie Herenton — on the same stage, though only one after the other, answering the same series of across-the-board questions.

    The event last Thursday, at the Bridge Builders site downtown, wasn’t therefore a debate — as moderators Roby Williams and Bobbi Gillis stressed — but it may have been the next best thing.

    Standing in front of a climbing wall in a cavernous, well-filled room, the four hopefuls appeared in sequence before the same audience and answered the same questions from Williams and Gillis, while members of the coalition set about grading the answers according to a four-level scale.

    Based on what the candidates said, how they said it, and what others said about it later on, these are some broad conclusions:

    John Willingham, who was first up, clearly meant to demonstrate that he was no crank but a serious man with serious proposals. The former Shelby County commissioner was a beneficiary, as he always is from time-restrictive formats, of the two-minute-per-answer limits on the nine questions asked.

    Kept thereby from waxing prolix, Willingham was still able to offer a host of specific proposals. Some of them, e.g., drastically curtailing a mayor’s contractual authority and the number of his patronage positions, seemed good fits for the current debate on charter changes. Others, like his concept of turning the Fairgrounds into an Olympic training village that could generate 2,000 jobs and $2 billion in annual revenues, were of the sort that Willingham fans would consider visionary and non-fans might regard as fanciful.

    Even under the time and format constraints, Willingham put forth too many proposals and statistics to be easily summarized. All that was consistent with the suggestion that the mayor’s job was to be both an executive and an idea man. Conversation among attendees afterward indicated that those who tend to see him as a crank will continue to do so; those who regard him as farsighted and misunderstood, likewise. A point of general agreement concerned his limited base and the small likelihood of his being elected.

    Herman Morris was the second candidate to appear. He spoke briskly and without hesitation, letting general statements substitute for extended elaboration.

    Contrasting his up-from-poverty background with his quality education (Rhodes College, Vanderbilt law school), Morris characterized himself as an able executive with a proven track record, especially at MLGW, which he headed for seven years. He also noted such involvements as his former chairmanship of the Greater Memphis Chamber of Commerce, experience on industry-seeking missions, and 20 years’ membership on a state lawyers’ ethics panel, two years as chairman.

    In answer to a question about achieving diversity in government, Morris, an African American who emphasizes his potential appeal to both races, gave an answer that might resonate better with whites than with blacks.

    The standard for city employment, he said, should be “not just diversity, but … merit, experience, talent, skills, history, track record of success,” as it was at MLGW under his administration, he said. That was a head-scratcher, unless, as a Republican well-wisher opined, it was one means of distancing himself from recent publicity regarding his well-received remarks at gay/lesbian forums.

    Verdict: Morris, markedly less stiff than when he first announced, held his place in line. He’s viable if he can somehow generate better across-the-board traction than he’s managed so far. Among other things, he repeated his challenge for other candidates to follow his lead in taking a drug test. For all the trying, that one has not yet so much as blipped on the public radar screen.

    He may have a way to go before convincing a majority that he is something “new and different and better.”

    Willie Herenton was the third candidate to appear. Unsurprisingly, the mayor wanted to talk specifics — or at least those stats and achievements that suggested his first four terms had been a success.

    Herenton eschewed the “hating on me” rhetoric of an earlier speech to the Whitehaven Kiwanis Club. Appearing stately and dignified, he warned against “novices,” boasted of his “40 years in public service,” recapped his career as a school principal, school superintendent, and mayor, and repeated his series of rhetorical challenges to the Chamber of Commerce concerning which mayor had presided over the city’s best economic growth, per capital income, etc. “Of course, I already know the answer to that,” he said.

    Herenton declared, “We have virtually eliminated decayed public housing as we have known it in the past.” He also boasted a blameless personal record on ethics matters and claimed to have achieved the most diverse city workforce in Memphis history. Other professed achievements were more familiar — like downtown redevelopment in general and, in particular, the FedExForum and the NBA franchise that came with it.

    So far, so good, except that such accomplishments are no longer regarded as unalloyed benefits and are the subject these days of a critical second sight.

    All in all, the mayor may not have provided a fresh prospectus or a convincing rebuttal to his opponents’ insistence that it’s “time for a change.”

    Carol Chumney was the final speaker, and her reception was every bit as revealing as anything explicit she said at the event. Council member Chumney’s persona as a persistent scold of the administration and of government and politics as usual continues to serve as both medium and message.

    Unlike the other candidates, the former state legislator made few concrete proposals, couching her statements almost solely in terms of the shortcomings she perceives in the current city administration or in terms of general goals. Her very first sentence said it: “I’m running to bring about safe streets, safe schools, and safe neighborhoods and to clean this city up once and for all.”

    Though her Web site contains specific proposals, Chumney on the stump rarely deals in such specific terms. Her remedies at the forum were more broadly stated: e.g., “more accountability … a mayor more capable of inspiring the city … stronger on children and youth … neighborhood watch programs … stronger code enforcement … partnerships with all kinds of people,” and so forth.

    As during the nearly four years of her service on the council, Chumney proved most compelling when she presented herself as the avenger, as the dedicated scourge of everything that is wrong with city government. “You know, we have a lot of moonlighting going on at City Hall. People don’t talk about that,” she said at one point. And ears perked up.

    Overall, to judge by word-of-mouth afterward, Willingham’s presentation was discounted more than it might have been if his prospects were deemed brighter; Morris held his own; Herenton came off well (if somewhat out of answers on the freshness front); and Chumney, questions about her financial wherewithal notwithstanding, is still getting the benefit of the doubt.

    • Among the several other groups sponsoring candidate forums are Mid-South Democrats in Action (MSDIA) and One Hundred Black Men, who collaborated in an event last week at the University of Memphis Law School featuring candidates for the three council positions in Super-District 8.

    Turnout by the candidates was good — as, in the opinion of most observers, was the content of candidate responses. The major absentees for the forum were Position 1 incumbent Joe Brown and Position 2 challenger Janis Fullilove (who was apparently conducting a simultaneous campaign event).

    • Two District 9 races are attracting much attention. That for Position 2 is widely regarded as a showdown between lawyer/broadcast executive Shea Flinn and businessman Kemp Conrad — a Democrat and a Republican, respectively, though both have support across partisan lines. Newcomer Frank Langston also has good support. “Memphis Watchdog” blogger Joe Saino will have an impact, as may Joseph Baier.

    Contenders for Position 3 include another well-connected newcomer, Reid Hedgepeth, businessman Lester Lit, lawyer/activist Desi Franklin, neighborhood activist and former interim legislator Mary Wilder, and Democratic activist Boris Combest. The first three named have most of the sign action so far.

    A detailed version of these items is available in “Political Beat” at www.memphisflyer.com.