Categories
Opinion The Last Word

On Christian Nationalists

As keynote speaker at the Notre Dame Religious Liberty Summit conference in Rome last July, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said that “religious liberty is under attack.”

Speaking at an earlier Notre Dame event, former U.S. Attorney William Barr claimed there is an “assault on religion … not decay. This is organized destruction.” When Barr and Alito — Roman Catholics — say religion, their concern is Christianity. They, along with evangelical ministers, regularly claim that their beliefs are under attack, that our modern society is decadent, and the cause of our moral decay is a decline in religiosity.

Were this claim valid, one would see moral decay paired with increased crime rates. But the data shows something very different. As religious belief has declined, so, too, have crime rates. And Denmark, Sweden, and other Western democracies that are far more secular than the U.S. have much lower crime rates. The correlation may be coincidental, but the statistics imply that crime and religious belief go hand in hand.

Few would think that, but Freakonomics economists Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner make the compelling case for an indirect relationship. They show that the fall in crime rate is a consequence of Roe v. Wade, which reduced the number of unwanted children who would have been more likely to go astray. Levitt and Dubner’s conclusion is controversial, but if they are correct, future generations will see a rise in crime, due to the Christian crusade, which overturned Roe.

But an even more compelling question is: Who is attacking Christianity? Though neither Barr nor Alito provides an answer, hate-crime statistics offer some insight. Fifty-eight percent of all hate-crime victims were targeted because of racial prejudice, 20.1 percent because of bias against religion, and 16.7 because of discrimination against sexual orientation.

In the religion category, bias against Jews was most significant at 60 percent, followed by anti-Muslim at 13 percent. Christian groups, including Catholic, Protestant, and other Christian branches, comprise 9 percent. So, of all hate crimes in America, crimes against Christians represent less than 2 percent. That is a serious matter, but while Jews are nearly seven times more likely to be the victims of hate crime, it is the Christians who complain. Shakespeare would think, “Christians doth protest too much.”

Yet as Christians portray themselves as victims, they have steadily gained power and influence. Six of the nine presiding Supreme Court justices are Christian. There was also a majority of Christian fundamentalists in the Trump administration. Christians have never been more influential than they were in the Trump administration, just two short years ago. And Christians still dominate the Republican party. Christianity is certainly not in any immediate danger.

On the other hand, the number of people who identify as Christian is declining. Christianity, especially fundamentalism, is threatened, not by a group of elitist liberals or some organized conspiracy. Religion is threatened by progress, the advance of civilization and science, especially the advance of secular humanism. Each generation in the U.S. is less religious than the previous.

From the Revolution onward, personal freedom and human rights have been steadily expanded, ending slavery, securing women’s voting rights, guaranteeing civil rights, permitting interracial and gay marriage, and securing rights for gay and transgender people. Rather than a moral decline, secular humanism has generated a more just society, one that is inclusive, that recognizes that people are simply what nature’s god wants them to be.

Thinking Christians understand that while Christ’s teaching of love thy neighbor is central to a meaningful life, the fundamentalist world views are no longer relevant. People haven’t lost their way; they have found better ways to understand and cope with the complexities of modern society. Reason and fact have proven more effective than myth and mysticism. Prayer may offer hope and comfort, but modern medicine cures.

The success of secular humanism is further reflected in our increased understanding of the physical world and the advanced technology. Whatever one believes God to be, it is certain that humankind has developed, or was given, superior intelligence and the ability to reason, which we appear obligated to use.

Christian fundamentalism may inhibit progress but cannot stop it. Banning books, concealing historical facts that make children uncomfortable, or requiring that creationism be taught along with evolution are wrongheaded and futile. The facts supporting evolution and the facts that led to the Civil War will always exist. Germany sets the right example. There, teaching of the Holocaust is mandatory. Teaching the history of slavery and our treatment of Native Americans should be required here as well. Americans can rightfully be proud of our heritage and aware of our achievements and our failings.

Christianity has impacted our culture in positive ways. Martin Luther King Jr., for example, awakened our collective conscience to the atrocities of Jim Crow. But if Christianity is to be a force for good in modern society, it must reconcile itself with reality and our reasoned understanding of the modern world.

That may be wishful thinking. Today white Christian nationalists would rather fight, openly opposing humanism. Despite having a secular Constitution, they falsely claim that America was founded as a Christian nation. They criticize Jefferson’s ideas of separating church and state, say that our laws should conform to Christian teaching, and work to restrict voting rights and personal freedoms. But then, freedom, equality, and democracy have never been the goals of Christianity.

By opposing secular humanism, Christian fundamentalists oppose the very thing that inspired the founding fathers and the foundation of America. With their confused and mistaken view of American history, white Christian nationalists attack what they claim to be saving. They are on the wrong side of history, and there is no stopping progress.

Bob Topper is a retired engineer and is syndicated by PeaceVoice.

Categories
Food & Wine Food & Drink

Avenue Coffee Serving Coffee for a Cause

It all started with a college assignment in 2010. Freshmen at Mid-South Christian College were placed in groups and told to come up with an idea for an outreach in Memphis. Group number 10 envisioned a coffee shop where people could have open conversations and form lasting relationships while fighting for social justice locally and globally.

Thanks to help from friends and several local churches, the team’s philanthropy has found its roots at the corner of Echles Street and Douglass Avenue, a half-mile south of the University of Memphis.

Avenue Coffee opened to the public on April 25th, serving loose-leaf tea and locally roasted Reverb Coffee alongside freshly baked cookies, muffins, and cupcakes.

Justin Fox Burks

Jaron Weidner, and Rebecca Skaggs

The team that established and is running Avenue Coffee comprises five students from Mid-South — Rebecca Skaggs, Nicolas Griffin, Elizabeth Bliffen, Adiel Estrada, and Jordan Miller — and one Visible School alumnus, Jaron Weidner.

The coffee shop is a non-profit, and the team plans to focus on one social justice theme each month, donating money to a related charitable organization and raising awareness of the month’s cause with art and live music by local artists.

But they also hope to make a more personal impact in the community by encouraging college students and others to invest in each others’ lives through good, old-fashioned face time.

“We want to reach out to Memphis; we want to help create a better community; and we want to get involved in people’s lives and give them quality conversation,” Skaggs says. “We’re all Christians, and this isn’t some covert operation to get into people’s lives and make them convert. But we really just want to introduce them to Christ’s love, and we want to do that by forming lasting relationships and giving them a quality service.”

Avenue’s handmade drink menu includes: Reverb’s medium roast Costa Rican coffee blend, prepared pour-over style ($2/$2.50), espresso ($1), lattes ($3.25/$3.75), loose-leaf tea ($3), and tea lattes ($4). The strawberry milkshake latte ($4) is a perfect, not-too sweet blend of strawberry rooibos tea with steamed milk and vanilla flavoring.

Debbie’s Heavenly Morsels, an assortment of treats from local baker Debbie Stephens, are also baked and sold at Avenue Coffee, giving customers the chance to savor cookies, muffins, or cupcakes ($2 each) with their freshly brewed cup o’ Joe.

Each morning, Stephens bakes at least three different types of muffins, three kinds of cupcakes, and four varieties of cookies to be sold at Avenue. She uses organic ingredients when available.

She says some customer favorites are the lemon-poppy muffins, sour-cream coffee-cake muffins, oatmeal-raisin cookies, and heavenly morsels cookies, which feature oatmeal, chocolate chips, butterscotch, and toffee.

“We’ve been kind of experimenting every day, but there are some we’ll have every day,” Stephens says. “We have the heavenly morsels and peanut-butter Oreo cookies. Every now and then I’ll feature the pecan pie cookie. A new one I introduced yesterday was an apple-walnut-raisin muffin that was my great aunt’s recipe.”

Baking is in Stephens’ blood. “My great grandfather was a baker in Brooklyn,” Stephens says. “He came over from Russia, and my grandmother and all of her siblings used to work in that bakery, so I’ve gotten some recipes from her over the years. I’ve been baking since I was probably 8 years old.”

After retiring from FedEx last May, Stephens connected with the Avenue team through her church, East Win Christian Church.

“I had decided that I either wanted to open up a bakery or work in a bakery, and because this was mission-minded, it was the perfect fit for me,” Stephens says.

Stephens sells her goodies by the dozen, and she also accepts special orders for mini muffins, pies, cookie cakes, and decorated cakes.

Avenue has a typical coffee-shop vibe with tables, Wi-Fi, and plenty of outlets for people trying to be productive. But the split-level building also has couches in an alcove on the upper level for customers who want to hang out and chat.

When the team was discussing what to name the shop, team member Elizabeth Bliffen suggested the name Avenue Coffee.

“It works because we’re on an avenue [Douglass], and we want this to be an avenue into people’s lives and an avenue to find the truth of Jesus Christ,” Skaggs says.

They are looking for people willing to volunteer a few hours working at the shop. If interested, call the store or send an email to avenuecoffee@gmail.com.

Avenue Coffee is open Monday through Saturday from 7 a.m. to midnight.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

It’s Secular

The office of the president is a secular office in a secular government. There is not a word in the Constitution that authorizes the president or anyone else in the federal government to make a religious decision.

Why then are both voters and candidates wasting their time talking about religion? The personal religious beliefs of the candidates should be considered irrelevant. Furthermore, people should not forget that there are a lot more professors of religion than practitioners. What a person claims to believe and how that person leads his or her life are often quite different.

Laws are, in the final analysis, words on paper. They cannot and do not control human behavior. If they could, there would be no crimes. Americans, especially politicians, have developed the bad habit of thinking that there ought to be a law to cover every conceivable human action. Consequently, there are so many laws today that no human being can possibly know what they all are. This defeats one of the useful purposes of laws, which is to educate the public.

As for religion, people should recognize that all the world’s religions have failed to eliminate sin, and therefore no one should expect the government to do that. Christianity in particular is based on the twin concepts of sin and forgiveness. Governments are better at finding sin than at forgiving.

Religion has a legitimate role in our society. George Washington said religion is the best way known to instill virtue in masses of people. That is job enough for religion, and religion should stay out of politics as an organization. Religious individuals, of course, have the same rights and duties as any other citizen.

Religion itself has enough problems to solve. Christian Zionists, for example, are a heretical cult without any biblical foundation and with a political agenda. Other Christians have perverted the religion into a weekly course on how to be rich and happy. Christianity, in fact, teaches that it is easier to pass a camel through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. Militant Christianity is a contradiction in terms.

If you are trying to find someone actually practicing Christianity, whom would you choose — a preacher with a six-figure salary, a limousine, and a private jet or, say, an actor like Brad Pitt, who has committed $5 million of his own money to build homes for people in New Orleans’ 9th Ward?

In judging human affairs, always look for actions, not words. What a person says tells you nothing reliable; what a person does gives you a better clue as to what kind of a person he or she is. At the same time, don’t forget the dual nature of human beings.

One can find faults with all religions. One should not forget, however, that the same can be said of all secular philosophies, ideologies, and institutions. Nothing human is or ever will be perfect.

As for the presidential candidates, people should be asking not what these people claim to believe about God, but what have they actually done? How do their lives measure up to their speeches? Do they demonstrate a belief in and a concern for the Constitution? Do they have a wide knowledge of the world as it truly is? Are they catering to special interests? Are they independent thinkers or followers?

The presidential race is, after all, a search for a secular leader, not for a pope or ayatollah. The United States is in deep trouble politically, financially, and economically. It will take a smart, sane, and courageous person to get us out. Opportunists and people who sell their souls for campaign contributions may well preside over our national collapse.

Charley Reese has been a journalist for 50 years.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

The Preacher in Chief?

As we all know, the president of the United States is elected by and swears to serve all citizens of this nation by protecting and defending the Constitution, not the Bible or any other religious text. America — founded by men who in some instances proclaimed Jesus as their God — was created to assure the freedoms of religion and conscience without regard to an individual’s personal beliefs, creed, or worship practices.

The Republican Party appears to have abandoned any commitment to this tenet of the Constitution and is positioned to nominate a preacher in chief, whose first loyalty will be to the dogmas of Christian fundamentalism.

And they have a constituency. Across the country, sprawling corporate religious “lifestyle centers,” serving more as Christian country clubs than as houses of worship, have produced congregations who foster a blend of ostentatious piety, self-righteous intolerance, and unyielding arrogance. For these churchgoers, voting Republican is de rigueur.

Unprecedented amounts of wealth have been amassed in many of these churches, not in small part as a result of the wealth-redistribution policy of the Republican administrations’ faith-based government programs. The threat of losing this power and money may in fact be looming large in the selection of the party’s nominee and in the desperately pious tone, manner, and attitude of the Republican presidential acolytes.

Not to be outdone, the media, particularly cable television punditry and radio talk-show hosts, are reliably helping to advance the idea of establishing a religious “test” for candidates. Although the most recent Republican debate fielded questions created by viewers of YouTube, those questions were vetted and selected by officials at CNN. Thus, all Republican presidential candidates were asked by Wolf Blitzer if they believed in the inerrancy of the Bible. (Any guesses as to how the pack of them answered?)

Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, a proud member of God’s Own Party and an ordained Baptist minister, may be the most flagrant offender against the Constitution. Huckabee recently told a group of students at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University that his astonishing rise in the Iowa polls is an “act of God.” He has also received letters of endorsement from Tim LaHaye, author of the “Left Behind” series of novels which extol the Rapture as an imminent end-of-the-world phenomenon.

Huckabee has stated on the record that he does not believe in evolution and lists among the most urgent issues facing the country the perils of abortion and gay marriage, as well as threats to the unlimited rights of gun-owners. His frequent statements of religiosity are delivered with a jocular smile and a sense of humor — designed, apparently, to seem non-threatening to anyone who is not a believer.

And, as if this country hasn’t suffered enough division, enough religious hypocrisy, and enough self-righteous intolerance in the last seven years, now we have former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, an ex-moderate of sorts, hastening to join the ranks of Christian soldiers in the Republican Party and seeking like the rest to impose a religious obligation on political service. His immediate motivation, amplified by concern about rival Huckabee, is to gain the White House at any cost, but the ultimate result of his apostasy from reason is to further erode the wall separating church and state in this country — something most Christian fundamentalists believe is a myth concocted by God-hating secular liberals.

Prompted by Huckabee’s surge, Mormon Romney has ramped up his attempt to sway the fundamentalist crowds and seems determined to try to one-up Preacher Huckabee. He may indeed have trumped Huckabee with this mind-bending assertion: “Freedom requires religion, just as religion requires freedom. … Freedom and religion endure together, or perish alone.” Can Romney really not know of the suppression, torture, and murder of heretics and infidels by Christians (and members of virtually every other religion) throughout history?

When candidates such as Romney and Huckabee ratchet up their efforts to destroy the separation of church and state established by this country’s founders, it requires those of us in the electorate to ratchet right back. After all, it is an election that will be held in America next November, not an altar call.

Cheri DelBrocco writes the “Mad As Hell” column for MemphisFlyer.com.