Categories
Editorial Opinion

“Fixing” Elections

It seems clear enough that several of the City Council races just run were determined by such obvious factors as name recognition and big-money advertising. On the latter score, so numerous and ubiquitous were one successful candidate’s yard signs that his campaign manager was able to say, only half-jokingly, that some of the signs probably needed to be recycled. That candidate, who campaigned in lieu of attendance at the several candidate forums held at frequent intervals and at a variety of locations, won. Yes, he probably was supported by what could be called “special interests,” but so were several other candidates — well-regarded incumbents and newcomers alike.

Giving all these worthies the benefit of the doubt (and yes, there was a definite correlation between financial support and victory), we have the right to hope that they will act in office with integrity and independence.

Another feature of this and other recent political campaigns was the prevalence of attack ads on TV. Results in this sphere were hit-and-miss, though there was little doubt that the persona of Jerry Springer, television shlockmeister nonpareil, was a downer for any candidate his name was coupled with — whether a candidate was bragging of a connection, as in one case, or imputing an unsavory relationship, as in another.

Then there were the polls. Heated controversies erupted between the camps of competing mayoral candidates, both as to the reliability of these supposedly scientific surveys and to their sponsorship, acknowledged or unacknowledged. We are not in a position to judge the latter question — nor, for that matter, the former. All we can say with certainty is that the results on election day were somewhat out of kilter with any and all of the published surveys.

Today’s financial-disclosure laws exist to provide curbs on overt special-interest support. The public media are similarly required to make space and time available on a non-discriminatory, first-come/first-served basis. As far as attack ads and polls are concerned, there is very little remedy, except for voters to outfit themselves with abundant supplies of those proverbial grains of salt.

In the end, it is the people themselves — not hucksters, not pollsters, not technicians, and not even the ever-burgeoning class of campaign professionals — who are charged with the duty of electing our public officials. There have been several intriguing proposals made of late for re-charging our electoral process — ranging from a guaranteed-instant-runoff formula (dependent on multiple-choice ballots for voters) to proposals for mandating majority turnouts.

But the remedy we continue to take most seriously is the one we hear the most about but which rarely gets acted upon anywhere — and in Memphis and Shelby County, never. That is the idea of publicly financed elections. Chances are, unfortunately, that the newly elected crop of City Council members will lend an open ear to the idea of continuing PILOT (payment-in-lieu-of-taxes) subsidies for new industry. Even a small fraction of the money thereby given away would pay for publicly financed elections.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

POLITICS: Something for Everybody

Let’s be optimistic. The new city council may turn out to
be ideally balanced between Memphis’ disparate races, social groups, and special
interests.

Among the outright winners last Thursday night were:

District 4: Wanda Halbert, an African
American and a seasoned school board member whose inner-city concerns will be
balanced with knowledge of mainstream issues;

District 5: Jim Strickland, a lawyer whose
whopping 73 percent total over five opponents gave some indication of the
widespread appeal enjoyed by this white former Democratic chairman (whose law
partner is U.S. attorney David Kustoff, a former GOP chairman).

District 7: Barbara Swearengen Holt-Ware, a
black veteran and firm ally of Mayor Willie Herenton who easily turned
aside an energetic challenge from four opponents.

Super District 8, Position 1: Whether he’s profiting
from the cachet of the former Criminal Court judge and current TV jurist who has
the same name as himself or, alternatively, is just well liked for his stout
attention to inner-city neighborhood concerns, Joe Brown made it back
easily over two opponents.

Super District 8, Position 2: More moderate than her
reputation in some quarters, Janis Fullilove has been a fixture on the
airwaves for almost two decades, and her name ID by itself was enough to
overpower seven well-qualified opponents, including interim incumbent Henry
Hooper
.

Super District 8, Position 3: Myron Lowery, a
hard-working fixture on the council for a generation and a pillar of both
mainstream and minority concerns, had no problem with his two opponents.

Super District 9, Position 1: Scott McCormick,
the likely new chairman, outpolled all other council candidates and prevailed
easily in a battle in which his ex-military opponent made few public
appearances.

Super District 9, Position 2: Shea Flinn,
Democratic son of a Republican county commissioner, outpointed runner-up Kemp
Conrad
, who had GOP support, thanks to his big-bucks campaign, his own
appeal, and an impressive run from “Memphis Watchdog” Joe Saino, who
harvested liberally from Conrad’s conservative base.

Super District 9, Position 3: The winner here was
developer Reid Hedgepeth, whose campaign spent bigtime and had so many
yard signs that Hedgepeth’s campaign manager, retiring councilman Jack
Sammons
, wryly suggested recycling some of them at a late fundraiser.

Though he may have lost some votes to challenger Lester
Lit
, Hedgepeth saw his main competitor, lawyer Desi Franklin, sharing
enough crucial votes with fellow Democrat Mary Wilder to have to
settle for runner-up status.

Still to be determined:

There will be runoffs on November 8 in four district races.

District 1: School board member Stefanie Gatewood,
an M.O.R. black, vies with teacher Bill Morrison in a northern-suburb
district whose demographics now tilt African American. Educators won’t lose
either way.

District 2: The survivors from a multi-candidate
field in this eastern-edge district are, as expected, former assessor and
veteran civic figure Bill Boyd and hard-charging well-supported lawyer
Brian Stephens
, who had the early head start. A tossup.

District 3: Though still youthful, Harold Collins
is a veteran of public service and has much influential support, while teacher
Ike Griffith has some grass-roots strength of his own. Collins is
considered the favorite.

District 6: Another teacher, Edmund Ford
Jr.,
now a graduate student, had a sizeable election-day lead over runner-up
James O. Catchings, himself a well-known educator. It remains to be seen
whether the current legal predicament of Ford pere, who is leaving the
seat, will be a help or a hindrance in the runoff.

  • Wasting no time: Three of the newly elected
    council members – Strickland, Hedgepeth, and Flinn – met Monday for a working
    lunch at The Little Tea Shop, a downtown restaurant.

    The trio compared notes on the campaign and discussed
    issues, agreeing that crime control would be the dominant issue for the newly
    configured council.

    Hedgepeth, a 30-year-old developer and political newcomer,
    took criticism during the campaign for avoiding all the scheduled candidate
    forums. He acknowledged he had relied heavily on the advice of Sammons and
    co-campaign manager Nathan Green. But he quipped, “I’ll be at all the forums
    from now on!”

    Those, he was
    reminded, will be scheduled on Tuesday at regular two-week intervals.

  • Categories
    News

    Memphis NetWorx: Confusion Still Reigns

    Tuesday morning, Councilwoman Barbara Swearengen-Ware offered a resolution (unanimously passed) asking the Tennessee Regulatory Authority not to approve the sale of Memphis Networx, MLGW’s $28-million telecom disaster. The sale is, “premature and not in the public’s interest,” she said.

    On Thursday afternoon, as she solicited votes in front of the Greenlaw Community Center, Ware admitted that she didn’t fully understand everything that has transpired regarding Networx’ $11.5-million sale to Communication Infrastructure Investments (CII), a heavily financed holding company based in Boulder, Colorado.

    “I’ve never heard of them,” Ware said, when asked what she knew about Zayo Bandwith, a Denver/Louisville-based commercial bandwith company founded by a group of telecom executives including CII founders Dan Caruso and John Scarano. Zayo has recently issued a series of press releases touting its recent acquisition of Memphis Networx.

    Earlier this summer, Scarano appeared bewildered when councilwoman Carol Chumney asked if his company was willing to discuss forming a partnership with the city of Memphis. After a few one-liners about never having conducted business in public, he allowed that, if Memphis was ready to take on the financial risks of a venture-capital firm, maybe they could talk.

    Chumney looked silly, and a portion of the audience — the middle-aged white guys in suits portion — chuckled at the blond crusader’s naivete. Didn’t she know the city had dragged the private investors into the partnership then bailed when Networx needed more dough? Couldn’t she understand that business is business no matter who the partners are? And it’s not like CII — a company created to manage risk — was a commercial bandwith company like the newly minted Zayo.

    Ware says she’s “offended” that CII refuses to cooperate with the City Council by answering questions pertaining to the management and private ownership of Memphis Networx prior to the company’s sale.

    Unquestionably, the sale of Networx to CII was a deliberate and successful end-run around the City Council, but the council couldn’t enforce transparency even when MLGW was the majority investor in Networx, so it’s unlikely to gin up any leverage at this late date. And it’s hard to know if Ware’s resolution was anything more than political theatrics on an election eve. At best, it’s an idea that has arrived years late and millions of dollars short.

    Zayo is heavily capitalized, with a quarter-billion in venture capital and the full attention of industry analysts, who are beginning to cite Zayo’s immense capitalization as further proof that the great telecom revival has arrived. And Zayo’s “we-got-it-come-and-get-it” attitude suggests that attorneys will be unleashed if any roadblocks are thrown up by the council or the TRA. The company’s press materials state that while some of the company’s fiber acquisitions are still pending regulatory approval, Networx is owned outright by Zayo.

    It’s a big pill to swallow, but Networx is probably gone. And all suggestions of a public fleecing aside, if there wasn’t a question of partial public ownership, the company’s sale would have been covered in its entirety in a two-inch column on page three of The Commercial Appeal‘s business section. It would be over and forgotten by now because, all value judgments aside, in business these things happen every day.

    When asked if a bidding process that even MLGW’s board of governors described as “flawed” could be considered relative to approving the sale of Memphis Networx, a TRA spokesperson was vague to the point of being unquotable.

    And what would happen if Networx’ sale to CII/Zayo was somehow reversed? Even in the midst of what appears to be a telecom comeback, its unlikely that the city will find a buyer actually willing to fork out more money for some holding company’s sloppy seconds.

    And if Memphis decided to go it alone in the telecom biz, ratepayers and/or taxpayers would be called on once again to pony up millions (if not tens of millions) to effectively reboot the entire system and get new and necessary building projects underway.

    Two weeks prior to his third-place finish in Memphis’ mayoral race, former MLGW president Herman Morris admitted he was too ambitious in his decision to create Memphis Networx as a public/private partnership.

    “It’s not that it can’t work,” he said. “But it didn’t work here.”

    Even with a new City Council on the horizon, there’s still no reason to believe that it can work here. If Networx executives and private investors have been secretive, our civic leaders have shown a bizarre and counterproductive unwillingness to understand the telecom industry they waded into. Now, like an orphaned baby, they curl up next to the sock monkey of their resolutions, unable to understand that they are alone and adrift, with no easy excuses or answers.

    Should the council continue to seek closure and gain a better understanding of what went wrong with Memphis Networx? Absolutely. And an investigation into MLGW might be a good place to start. But its probably delusional to think that reclaiming Memphis Networx would be anything short of disastrous. The only thing dumber than starting the telecom was selling it. Taking it back would be a trifecta of what the insane Captain Queeg called geometric logic.

    On Tuesday, City Council attorney Allan Wade pointed out that Networx owes the City nearly $500,000 in unpaid fees. That bill should probably be sent, not to Networx or CII but to Zayo, along with a note asking about leveraging the old debt against a tiny piece of the action.

    — Chris Davis

    Read more about Networx.

    Categories
    News

    Libertyland, Part 1,287

    Libertyland advocates had another reason to say, “pip, pip hooray,” after Tuesday’s City Council meeting.

    The parks committee voted in favor of a resolution preserving and protecting both the Grand Carousel and the Zippin Pippin pending further study.

    “Basically, [this will] save it for the time being,” said resolution sponsor Myron Lowery.

    Committee chair Scott McCormick questioned whether the resolution might mean unforeseen expenditures.

    “This could go on for another two years. The Pippin is a wooden structure. What if the wood starts to rot?” he asked. “Are we going to have to rebuild it?”

    Lowery said the intent was to keep the roller coaster in its current state: “Let’s save the Pippin.”

    Categories
    Politics Politics Feature

    Early Voting Ends — and So Does the Early-Voting Reality Show

    Phase One of the 2007 Memphis municipal election – early
    voting – is over, as of Saturday. The final head-count of voters at the
    Election Commission and at 14 satellite locations was nearly 75,000 – a huge
    number — despite an alarm sounded week before last by incumbent mayor Willie
    Herenton that the Diebold machines being employed for the vote were unreliable.

    The mayor’s reaction was interpreted by his main
    adversaries – councilwoman Carol Chumney and former MLGW head Herman Morris – as
    a red herring and as what Morris called a “desperate” act. Whatever the case,
    the record volume of responses during this year’s early voting attests to the
    widespread public interest in both the mayor’s race and the 13 races for city
    council.

    And so crucial was the two-week period regarded that some
    candidates – notably Reid Hedgepeth, running for the District 9, Position 3
    seat; and Cecil Hale, vying for the District 9, Position 1 seat – devoted almost
    all their time and energies to long stints of greeting voters at early-voting
    sites (Hale taking pains always, both verbally and with signs, to remind
    arriving voters that he was “U.S. Army, Retired”).

    Even those hopefuls who varied their campaign activities to
    include attendance at other events, including candidate forums, made a point of
    logging considerable time at several of the early-site locations.

    One of the East Memphis locations that was especially
    favored was at White Station Church of Christ on Colonial Rd. There so many of
    the District 9, District 5, and District 2 candidates gathered on a daily basis
    that they often developed relationships transcending their rivalry for this or
    that position.

    That wasn’t inevitably the case, though. A distinct
    coolness governed encounters between Hedgepeth and his supporters (prominent
    among whom was his close friend Richard Smith, son of FedEx founder Fred Smith)
    on one side and opponent Lester Lit, who had been critical of the political
    newcomer — early, often, and explicitly — on the other. (It should be said that the Hedgepeth
    crew, which also at various times and various locations included the candidate’s
    mother and mother-in-law, were generally patient and gracious to an extreme.)

    And, once in a while, cool turned into hot, as it did at
    the Bert Ferguson Community Center location in Cordova, where competing District
    2 candidates Brian Stephens and Todd Gilreath got into each other’s space one
    too many times, leading to a heated verbal exchange between the two.

    But mostly all was sweetness and light. Opponents stood
    shoulder to shoulder with each other as they handed out literature to voters,
    asked about each others’ families, and traded jokes and gossip in the manner of
    ad hoc comrades in arms.

    Entirely good-natured was the teasing that District 9,
    Position 2 candidate Kemp Conrad took from his rivals for his habit of running
    after new arrivals to be the first candidate they encountered. And, in the wake
    of a now famous Commercial Appeal article outlining various
    office-seekers’ financial and legal misfortunes, those who, like District 2
    candidate Scott Pearce, took bigger-than-usual hits, got friendly (and maybe
    even sincere) commiseration from other candidates.

    Rarely, it should be said, was discussion of issues the
    dominant leitmotif of exchanges between candidates and their respective
    entourages – or, for that matter, in their conversations with prospective
    voters.

    Overall, as indicated, the atmosphere at White Station and
    at other heavily frequented sites begat a kind of apolitical camaraderie among the
    various competing hopefuls that one might associate with TV reality shows like
    American Idol.

    It remains to be seen what that might portend, for
    better and for worse, in election years yet to come. But there is no
    doubting that early voting is now a permanent part of the election culture in
    these parts.

    Categories
    Politics Politics Feature

    Council Candidate Lit Blasts Absent Opponent Hedgepeth

    There have been many, many forums so far, involving
    candidates for mayor and the various city council positions.

    Almost all of them follow the same formula: opening
    statements, policy positions stated in response to generalized questions in
    specific subject areas like crime, education, economic development, than a
    standard vote-for-me close.

    Retired businessman Lester Lit broke new ground at a League
    of Women Voters forum for District 9 candidates Monday night. Not only did Lit,
    a candidate for District 9, Position 3, criticize an opponent at length and by
    name, he used the entirety of his opening and closing statement time to do so.

    Lit devoted his one-minute opening time to an attack on
    Reid Hedgepeth as lacking qualifications to serve. Then, flanked by fellow 9, 3
    candidates Mary Wilder, Desi Franklin, and Boris Combest, Lit used the
    two-minute period allotted him for a closing statement to say this:

    “…There really is an 800-pound gorilla in this room, and
    he’s not here tonight. His name is Reid Hedgepeth, and I’m going to tell you
    right now, with the backing that young man has, he could very well win this
    election, and that upsets me. I’m mad as hell to think that he could, because we
    have four very qualified candidates on this panel here tonight, and I’d feel
    very good if any of the four could serve as your representative on the next city
    council. I would not feel too happy if Reid Hedgepeth serves as my representative
    on the City Council.

    “He has been to no forums. He has been to no neighborhood
    associations. He is maintaining his campaign strictly with a hundred-thousand
    dollar budget on TV and slick mailers that he sends out, such as this one right
    here [brandishing a mailout flyer], which is — this is not even a picture
    of Memphis — this is Detroit that they’re using pictures of to mislead you…. Y’all
    were nice enough to come out this evening to try to learn about the candidates.
    I think you need to go one step further and educate yourself about the missing
    candidate, the one that I’m afraid could steal this election because of
    financial backing that he has.

    “I forgot to mention in my opening that not only has he
    never voted in a city council race in his life, he also made two separate
    donations to Rickey Peete two years after the last city election. So you do
    your homework. If you want to vote for one of us, you’ll get a good council
    person. Let’s not make any more mistakes. We’ve had enough mistakes. Let’s not go down that road anymore.”

    Categories
    Cover Feature News

    A New Direction

    There is a reason why you have to get out and about to see how things are going with this or that City Council candidate in the 2007 city election. Looking at financial disclosures is one thing, getting good word-of-mouth is another, checking out endorsement lists and the helpful voter guide prepared by the Coalition for a Better Memphis is yet a third. These are helpful indicators to the analyst, in a way that, say, position papers (which any self-respecting undergraduate can cook up) aren’t.

    But the best tool of all is the eyeball. Two cases in point: The race for District 9, Position 2, seemed at first a classic showdown between two seasoned but youngish candidates — Kemp Conrad and Shea Flinn — but all it took was one look-see at a mid-city meet-and-greet for the even more youthful political newcomer Frank Langston (a packed wall-to-wall affair transcending various political and civic lines) to understand that he, too, had to be considered a player.

    Yard signs can tell a tale, too. When retired businessman Lester Lit, who warmed up for his District 8 council bid with an unsuccessful County Commission race last year, told me he’d gone door to door and had located a yard sign at the home of someone I knew on Kirby Parkway, I drove by the next day to take a look. To my astonishment, every other yard on that well-traveled, posh thoroughfare seemed to bear a Lit sign.

    Clearly, Lit has learned a lot about campaigning, is working hard (he’s dropped 40 pounds in the process of running!), and must be ranked among the most serious candidates this year.

    Indeed, the makers of yard signs and vendors of billboard space seem to be thriving this year, as several candidates in an unusually wide-open election year are unbuttoning their pocketbooks and visibly rolling the dice. Another sign of their avidity will be the deluge of mailed materials Memphians can expect at their houses in this post-Labor Day stretch-drive period — with scarcely two weeks to go before the start of early voting on September 14th and less than a month until Election Day itself on October 4th.

    And, though most of the television advertising you’ll see will be by mayoral candidates, not a few council candidates — particularly in the six “super district” races — are taking to the airwaves, too.

    What’s at stake for council candidates is the opportunity to be on the ground floor of a new era in city government, with a majority of council incumbents eschewing a race for reelection and others in jeopardy. Whoever ends up being elected mayor will be faced with a virtually recast council, steeped in voter outrage over incidences of corruption, fiscal strains, and a panoply of vexing urban problems.

    On the plus side, this year’s crop seems for the most part to have done its homework, and most are realistic and ready to go to work on issues like de facto consolidation, charter change, and what to do about the Fairgrounds, the riverfront, and other problem areas.

    Here’s a thumbnail look at the races as of now. And don’t worry too much about possible oversights and premature judgments: The outlook in these contests will be continually chronicled, amended, and accounted for in weekly coverage, on the Flyer Web site, and in a final pre-election issue.

    District 1: For decades this district, spanning the city’s far-northern wards from Frayser to Cordova, has been the bailiwick of white, independent-minded working-class types — the retiring E.C. Jones, a hound for constituent service, being a case in point. Demographics, though, have evolved, and two of the three leading candidates are African-American.

    The early leader has been Stephanie Gatewood, who is well financed and supported and has represented the district for two terms on the school board. She faces fairly stout challenges from firefighter Antonio “2 Shay” Parkinson, a former Music Commission chairman who has a reasonably diverse base of support, and from Bill Morrison, a teacher who was the Democratic nominee last year against Republican incumbent Marsha Blackburn.

    As a measure of the demographic sea-change, Morrison is the only white candidate.

    Among other candidates, Jesse Jeff and Riesel Sandridge have some name identification from prior efforts, and W.B. Bates II, Rudolph Daniels II, and Keith Ferguson have all mounted efforts. Ferguson in particular generated some early e-mail activity but seems to have flagged of late.

    Gatewood hopes to hit the magic figure of 51 percent to avoid a runoff.

    District 2: Comprising the city’s ever-expanding eastern edge, this district is white-dominated and suburban in outlook. Though there are several impressive African-American candidates running, the race is generally considered a two-man affair between political veteran Bill Boyd and relative newcomer Brian Stephens, both white.

    Businessman Stephens got off to an early start, a fact which helped him stabilize after Boyd, a former assessor and longtime political activist, drew on his numerous connections to get the Republican Party’s endorsement, a coveted commodity in this district.

    Of the black candidates in the race, Ivon Faulkner is an impressive campaigner with name identification from previous races; Georgia Cannon is well known and well regarded as a result of a banking career and her many civic involvements; and Karen Camper, a military veteran, has run a poised campaign.

    Other candidates are Daryl Benson, Daniel Price, Todd Gilreath, and Scott Pearce, the latter of whom has generated a fair amount of yard-sign activity in the eastern precincts.

    District 3: This is one of two districts in which low-profile incumbents face stiff challenges from opponents who may be better known.

    The officeholder here is Madeleine Cooper Taylor, who had enough community standing — mainly from her work in medical auxiliary circles and with the NAACP — to earn an interim appointment last year to succeed TaJuan Stout Mitchell. But she has hardly been active enough since to become a household name, while Harold Collins, a seasoned local-government hand employed now in the district attorney’s office, has long association with both Memphis mayor Willie Herenton and Shelby County mayor A C Wharton, the latter of whom has gone public with his support of Collins.

    Two other candidates — Memphis city schools video maven Ike Griffith and education entrepreneur Coleman Thompson — have a fair degree of name identification from previous races and could contend. Others running are Albert Banks III, Davida Cruthird, Jerome Payne, and Ronald Peterson.

    District 4: Longtime school-board stalwart Wanda Halbert was overmatched in her Democratic primary race for Juvenile Court clerk last year against Shep Wilbun, but her name recognition and degree of support are far greater than those of opponent Johnny Hatcher, who has run for various offices before but never as a true contender.

    District 5: This Midtown-East Memphis district has been the province for the last four years of mayoral contender Carol Chumney, and one of Chumney’s opponents from the 2003 race, lawyer and former local Democratic chairman Jim Strickland, has basically been running for the seat ever since, amassing a generous war chest and across-the-board political support while easily establishing himself as the odds-on favorite.

    Of his five opponents, two — Jeff Bailey and Kerry Rogers — have been fairly inactive, though Bailey made a serious effort to introduce himself, at least to media outlets, early on. By general consent, Strickland’s chief challenger is environmental activist Bob Schreiber, who — largely using his own money — has made a genuine effort to be competitive with yard signs (riskily identifying him merely as “Bob”) and other campaign paraphernalia.

    Though widely respected, Schreiber has so far seemed uncomfortable in the spotlight — something that can’t be said about another activist candidate, Denise Parkinson, who has been a leading figure in the citizen effort to save Libertyland and who is as outgoing as Schreiber is (or seems to be) private and withdrawn. Unlike Strickland and Schreiber, however, Parkinson seems financially limited in her ability to mount a visible campaign.

    Though he has generated relatively little attention so far, lawyer Richard Parks, who ran unsuccessfully last year for a judgeship, seemed relaxed and forthcoming at the lone District 5 forum to date, as did Parkinson and Strickland. As indicated, Schreiber hasn’t yet gotten his legs in that kind of environment.

    For what it’s worth, there would seem to be a healthy streak of public-sector populism running throughout the District 5 candidate field. With a cumulative score of 92, Strickland had the second-highest ranking overall in scoring by the Coalition for a Better Memphis.

    District 6: Several of the district races seem destined for runoffs, but none more so than this one, held by an incumbent, Edmund Ford, who went in roughly a year’s time from being a fairly nondescript council member to being one of the most controversial, if not disliked, members of all time. Indicted twice and observed by the public in a bug-eyed apoplectic state several times during that time frame, Ford is bowing out — but only from his reelection race.

    The incumbent’s son, candidate Edmund Ford Jr., is a more soft-spoken, even eloquent specimen, but his father’s notoriety makes it unlikely that he’ll win outright. A host of other candidates, several of them impressive, are contesting the issue.

    There is former school board member Ed Vaughn, hopeful of mounting a political comeback. There are impressive newcomers like educator James O. Catchings and South Memphis Alliance president Reginald Milton. There are former candidates with still uncooked seeds, like Clifford Lewis and Perry Bond and Alicia Howard. And there are relative unknowns, like Charles Etta Chavez (that’s a she!), Jesse Chism, Philmore Epps Jr., and Willie H. Justice III.

    District 7: Incumbent Barbara Swearengen Holt-Ware may have changed her name in the last year (by marriage), but she hasn’t changed her nose-to-the-grindstone profile on the council — one that will doubtless assure a fairly easy reelection.

    For the record, though, she has three opponents: Veronica Sherfield Castillo, Preston T. Poindexter, and Derek D. Richardson. Castillo has managed to impress several observers, Poindexter has something of a following in Frayser, and Richardson is virtually unknown. All of them face long, long odds.

    Super Districts 8 and 9: When the late U.S. district judge Jerome Turner was faced years ago with resolving a series of racial-discrimination suits, he worked in Solomonic mode, often splitting the difference between plaintiffs and defendants in unexpected ways. His way of resolving a suit regarding council districts was typical. Abolishing six city-wide at-large districts, he created in their place District 8, a majority-black “super district,” and District 9, which was majority-white. Each of the two new super-districts elected three representatives.

    A proviso of the new arrangement was that, unlike the case of the seven regular districts, which employed runoffs when no candidate owned a simple majority, outcomes in the six super-district races would be winner-take-all. That same “no-runoff” provision also applies to citywide voting for mayor and city clerk.

    The irony is that a methodology that was meant to buttress the rights of the original African-American plaintiffs has, with the passage of time and demographic change, come to offer the same advantages to what is now a city-wide white — not black — minority.

    That’s sort of what outgoing councilman Dedrick Brittenum was driving at recently, when he suggested that the terms “majority” and “minority” be eliminated as descriptive phrases for legal purposes.

    For the time being, anyhow, the system holds.

    District 8, Position 1: This position, currently held by Joe Brown, is likely to stay that way, despite the incumbent’s penchant for over-the-edge public discourse (sometimes rivaling that of colleague Ford). Brown kicked up an international furor in 2004 when, serving as council chairman, he denied a visiting Iraqi government delegation entrance to City Hall on grounds that they might be a security threat.

    A street populist of sorts, with roots in neighborhood organizations, sanitation entrepreneur Brown is, perhaps appropriately, chairman of the council’s committee on public services and neighborhoods. Though he has a following of his own, he no doubt profits from having the same name as the former Memphis Criminal Court judge who now reigns over the airwaves as a TV jurist. And, for that or whatever other reason, he has eschewed appearing in public forums with his opponents or other council candidates.

    The two other candidates for Position 1 are Tiffany Lowe and Ian Randolph. Lowe, a family service counselor, has made virtue of necessity, boasting of her redemption from gang associations of her past that included several arrests and convictions, while Randolph, a financial adviser and former president of the Annesdale-Snowden neighborhood association, has demonstrated a penchant at public forums for arranging his responses to issues in orderly capsule form — or “bullets,” as he calls them.

    Each is making a strong effort with hopes, probably remote, of catching up with Brown.

    District 8, Position 2: When longtime incumbent Rickey Peete resigned his council seat to focus on his defense on a second bribery and extortion charge (he was convicted of such a charge during a previous council stint in 1988), his council mates appointed in his stead Henry Hooper, an insurance executive with a serious mien and a past as a secret service agent. As council chairman Tom Marshall wished out loud at the time, Hooper might strike the public as Peete’s opposite, image-wise.

    Hooper has proved, as advertised, a dignified presence — maybe, in his slow, deliberate way of speaking, too much of one. But he promptly suffered an embarrassment of his own when it was revealed he was the subject of an IRS lien of nearly half a million dollars.

    In any case, his incumbency has not been conspicuous enough to forestall a host of opponents, the best known of whom is Janis Fullilove, currently a Charter Commission member and a radio talk-show host of some years’ standing. Fullilove, who may be regarded as a slight favorite in the race, was for better and for worse the personal choice of the disgraced but popular Peete.

    Another hopeful, expected to vie for the lead with Hooper and Fullilove, is Trennie Williams, a poised ex-Marine who runs the family-owned newspaper Silver Star News. Williams, whose voter base is Orange Mound, has performed well in public forums so far.

    Another candidate who has been much in the news is 18-year-old George Monger, a precociously informed college freshman at Southwest Tennessee Community College whose extreme youth has been his major calling card. Other candidates are Matthew Jordan, Derrick Lanois, Brian L. Saulsberry, and David W. Vinciarelli, the latter being the lone white candidate in the race.

    On the evaluation scale of the Coalition for a Better Memphis, Williams leads Fullilove and Hooper in that order, though these and three other candidates — Lanois, Monger, and Vinciarelli — are closely clustered.

    District 8, Position 3: Poor Del Gill. You can’t fault the well-known maverick Democrat and perennial candidate for trying, but this time he’s up against an even more formidable opponent than usual — longtime incumbent Myron Lowery, who chairs three council committees and is a member of the Charter Commission besides. Well-known and highly respected, Lowery has as good a chance of any council candidate of leading this year’s election ticket. (City clerk Thomas Long, who gets to run citywide, will probably end up the top vote-getter, though.)

    It is sometimes said of Gill, who is bright but highly abrasive, that he might not win even if his name was the only one on the ballot for a given position. The predicament of Lowery’s other opponent, Toni Strong, is quite different. Though president of the South Memphis Neighborhood Association and a good performer in the candidate forums so far, she is still relatively little known district-wide. In any case, Lowery, whose campaign organization is well-funded and well-oiled, is in little danger of being bested.

    District 9, Position 1: Businessman Scott McCormick, an activist member of an activist family and chairman of the council’s parks committee, has been one of the council’s pivotal members in his two terms so far. He has often proved to be a consensus builder and, more than most council members, has been willing to line up with maverick colleague Chumney, as when the two of them took the lead in repealing the city’s easy-exit pension formula requiring only 12 years of service.

    Even with a name opponent, McCormick’s prospects for easy reelection would be good, but Cecil Hale, a former private contractor in Iraq who ran for Congress last year in the Republican primary, has been largely AWOL from public events and has engaged in little visible campaigning.

    Expect a slam dunk for the incumbent.

     

    District 9, Position 2: At the outset, this race looked, as mentioned above, like a showdown between two youngish politicians — former Republican chairman Kemp Conrad and former interim state senator Shea Flinn, a Democrat. Both are well-connected in local political and business circles and have varying degrees of bipartisan support. Conrad, who, as the GOP’s helmsman, seemed serious about outreach to African Americans, has enjoyed close ties in the past with Mayor Herenton and with the mayor’s son Rodney. He is the Republican Party’s endorsee but can also boast support from such centrist Democrats as power lawyer John Farris and Shelby County commissioner J.W. Gibson.

    When Conrad wondered of someone recently what kind of equivalent support Flinn had across party lines, the answer he got was short and succinct: George Flinn, the candidate’s father and a GOP member of the county commission. The senior Flinn, a well-heeled radiologist and broadcast magnate, is no passive onlooker. And the junior Flinn, for that matter, proved during his brief service in the legislature this year that he could build bridges to his counterparts across the aisle.

    From the beginning, as now, it has seemed obvious that Memphis Watchdog blogger Joe Saino, an inveterate scourge of corruption and politics as usual, would be a figure to reckon with, bringing his prodigious research on public issues into the balance.

    What nobody seemed to conjure with at first was the impact of the 23-year-old Frank Langston, member of a local entrepreneurial family and an activist in a variety of causes who has generated some impressive across-the-board support of his own. Starting out almost unnoticed, he has become a bona fide contender and his very presence in the race has blunted the others’ expectations to some degree — opinions differing as to whether Conrad or Flinn will be more affected.

    Joe Baier, a disafffected scourge in his own right, has support among conservative voters, as does Saino. Though listed on the ballot, James Lochbihler, a firefighter, is not actively campaigning. Ranking by the Coalition for a Better Memphis shows Conrad, Langston, and Flinn in that fairly clustered order.

    District 9, Position3: This race had, very early on, looked like a free ride for newcomer Reid Hedgepeth, who had avowed support from the outgoing councilman, Jack Sammons, as well as from FedEx founder Fred Smith. When developer Hedgepeth won the endorsement of the Shelby County Republican Party on top of that, his way home seemed even clearer — especially since the partisan facts of life suggested that Democratic activist Desi Franklin would be his major opponent.

    And Franklin, as it happened, was having to deal with competition from two other established Democrats — Vollintine-Evergreen activist Mary Wilder, who just completed an interim term as state House representative, and Boris Combest, a party executive committee member with roots in the African-American community.

    But that preliminary reckoning yielded to several other realities — among them, the vigorous and well-funded campaign efforts of both Franklin and, as indicated above, the aforementioned Lester Lit, whose Poplar corridor and East Memphis inroads are much more likely to come at the expense of Hedgepeth than of anyone else.

    Franklin still has much to worry about from Wilder, whose neighborhood clout will be buttressed and extended by the grunt work of the indefatigable David Upton, spinmaster and G.O.T.V. guru par excellence and Franklin’s dedicated rival among Democratic power brokers. The hard-working Combest is more of an unknown quantity, and both he and Wilder will be hurting for funds in comparison with Franklin, who can number Republican patriarch Lewis Donelson, the venerable senior member of her law firm, among her adherents.

    And not to be ignored is Lit. Like Langston in the Position 2 race, he has graduated from spoiler to contender.

    Franklin, by the way, boasts the highest rating of all candidates, a cumulative 93, in evaluations by the Coalition for a Better Memphis.

    Categories
    News The Fly-By

    Painting the Town

    Sometimes the writing is on the wall — literally. And it’s that writing the Memphis City Council is trying to abolish. This week, the City Council’s public safety and homeland security committee continued to talk about a proposed graffiti ordinance based on a strict New York City anti-graffiti law.

    Outgoing councilman Jack Sammons raised the question of graffiti at a committee meeting earlier this month after noticing an explosion of graffiti on his weekend bicycle rides around town.

    “It’s a never-ending problem, but if you believe in the broken windows theory … it’s something we cannot allow to go unabated,” he said.

    The broken windows theory — from a 1982 magazine article and later a 1996 book about reducing urban crime — says that unkempt neighborhoods contribute to crime.

    Sammons saw his “broken window” at a car wash on Southern Avenue that had been tagged. When he rode by it again, the building was awash in more graffiti.

    Memphis Police Department (MPD) director Larry Godwin wasn’t surprised. “If one gang puts something up, that’s disrespecting another gang. So they come and put something on it,” Godwin said. “Before you know it, you have a whole wall of graffiti.”

    Currently, MPD charges graffiti writers with vandalism, but officers have to catch them in the act. The New York City law bars minors from owning “graffiti instruments” and bans the possession of those same instruments in any public place with the intent to “make graffiti.”

    Godwin told council members that several things concern him about the New York law: Proving intent could be problematic and limiting spray paint sales to people old enough to vote would also be difficult.

    Godwin also noted that the New York police department has an entire division devoted to dealing with graffiti. Within the MPD, enforcing a graffiti ordinance would fall to patrol officers.

    Additionally, Memphis officials would need to be cautious in creating an ordinance. A federal appellate court struck down New York’s anti-graffiti law in the spring, saying it was overly broad. The most recent version of the law — signed earlier this month — includes the same general provisions, but includes exemptions for owning and using those darned graffiti instruments in an effort to make it constitutionally sound.

    In addition to defensive measures, council members also discussed ways to clean up graffiti. Carol Chumney suggested a citizen task force, and it appears that Operation Take Back, a faith-based initiative, is already on the walls.

    The program is led by Dwight Montgomery, head of the local Southern Christian Leadership Conference chapter and pastor of Annesdale Cherokee Missionary Baptist Church.

    Montgomery proposed several ideas to council members, including requiring guilty parties to clean up graffiti rather than serve jail time, a citizen hotline to report graffiti, and groups of cleaners to remove neighborhood graffiti.

    “We talked to Memphis City Beautiful about having paint and water-pressure machines,” Montgomery said. “We would have congregations participate in their own neighborhoods.”

    Memphis City Beautiful already has a tool bank that loans rakes, brooms, and shovels to neighborhood residents wanting to clean up their streets, but the organization doesn’t have any equipment for removing graffiti.

    Not that it has to stay that way. Councilman Scott McCormick, a former Memphis City Beautiful board member, said it would be great to get the group involved.

    “They do the same projects each year,” he told committee members. “You could utilize the board and give it new energy, but you will have to give it more funds. We have a resource sitting right there, but we don’t utilize it.”

    I’m not necessarily against graffiti. Regardless of the broken windows theory, I think some graffiti can inspire. But gang signs and territorial markings leave visual evidence of violence, almost in the same way bullet-ridden windows and police tape do.

    Despite the talk of a new ordinance, it seems to me that eliminating graffiti will fall to area residents. Look at littering. Like graffiti, it happens in the public realm. Unlike graffiti, I think I can safely say that littering doesn’t have any redeeming value. And though it’s illegal to litter — violators can get a $500 fine and 40 hours of community service for their first conviction — I see enough litter to know that the promise of an empty wallet and an orange vest isn’t enough to stop people.

    And if the city’s crime rates are any indication, police officers have more important criminals to catch.

    “The city is filthy,” Sammons said. “It’s dirtier than I’ve ever seen it. … It’s going to take more than a village. It’s going to take a battalion to clean up this city.”

    Categories
    Opinion Viewpoint

    Why Run for the Council?

    This is the last week to file papers to run for the Memphis City Council, where all 13 seats are up for grabs and seven of those positions are wide open. So what does the job offer, aside from the usual clichés about public service?

    Well, the council-mayor form of government in Memphis has only been around since 1968; in fact, some of its original members, including J.O. Patterson Jr., Fred Davis, and Lewis Donelson, are still active in professional and civic affairs. So it’s possible to make a few generalizations and predictions based on its history.

    First, a couple of things the council is not: a path to temptation and ruin or an easy road to the mayor’s office. Events of the day make it seem like the council is a sewer, and in the game of politics the scent of corruption is often in the air. But actual convictions for corruption in the line of duty are rare. Rickey Peete was convicted of bribery twice, most recently in 2007. John Ford was also convicted of bribery but for something he did long after his service on the council 25 years ago. Ditto Michael Hooks. All things considered, the Hall of Shame is a pretty elite club.

    And while several current and former council members have run for city or county mayor — Patterson, Ford, Mike Cody, Pat VanderSchaaf, Jack Owens, Bill Gibbons, Jack Sammons, Joe Ford, Shep Wilbun, and Carol Chumney, among others — they all lost. The exception was the late Wyeth Chandler in 1975. Mayor Willie Herenton is a former school superintendent. His predecessor, Dick Hackett, was county clerk before moving to City Hall. Henry Loeb, the mayor when Martin Luther King Jr. was killed, came from the old City Commission.

    More common is the City Council member who gains some name recognition and connections and either wins or is appointed to a full-time government job or something close to it. The ranks include Gibbons, John Ford, Owens, Wilbun, and, more recently, Herenton appointees Janet Hooks and TaJuan Stout Mitchell. Jeff Sanford, a councilman in the Chandler era, is head of the Center City Commission, which pays more and has fewer employees than the sheriff, district attorney, or clerk’s offices.

    Some council members move over to the Shelby County Commission, where the pay is the same but the hours are lighter and so is the public scrutiny. That group includes James Ford, Gibbons, Wilbun, Joe Ford, and Michael Hooks.

    Council members get to vote on some big deals, but they don’t originate them. High-profile building projects such as The Pyramid and FedExForum were ideas whose time had come, and their champions were outsiders. The same is true of big ideas like consolidation, term limits, selling MLGW, and freezing taxes, which are often discussed but have not come to a vote in the city of Memphis in nearly four decades. The standard brawls and debates are over such mundane matters as setting the tax rate, approving the budget, putting in or cutting out favored items, and haggling with the mayor over his nominations for the jobs of division directors and head of MLGW.

    The coolest thing about being on the council is that people suddenly pay attention to you whether or not you have anything interesting to say simply because you have a title. Council members get lots of face time on television, especially if they are as accessible and quotable as Sammons, Chumney, and Peete. This is the real 15 minutes of fame, although in the case of Sammons and Peete it was more like 15 years. And they get very nice pensions (about $9,000 a year) after 12 years, thanks to an ordinance passed by, you guessed it, the City Council.

    For more than a decade, the council has been divided racially with either six whites and seven blacks or seven whites and six blacks. This is likely to change next year because the city of Memphis is now approximately 63 percent black. Women, who had only token representation on the council until the 1980s, are also likely to increase their representation. Six of the seven members not running for reelection are men.

    All in all, it is no ordinary job, not the best and not the worst, and apparently nice work if you can get it, which plenty of people seem to want to do judging by the filings at the Shelby County Election Commission.
    John Branston, a Flyer senior editor, writes the City Beat column.

    Categories
    Politics Politics Feature

    A C, in D.C., Says No

    As Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, in Memphis on Monday night for a stop on his “Road to One America” tour, prepared to make his remarks at the MIFA Thrift Store on Vance, mayoral candidate Herman Morris, smiling and pressing the flesh, was working his way through the largely white and youngish crowd of some 300 — most presumably registered to vote in this year’s Memphis city election.

    Morris, accompanied by his wife Brenda, couldn’t have seemed more carefree, and when someone said to him, “You must be the happiest man in Memphis right now,” Morris grinned. “Maybe the second happiest,” he corrected. “I’d have to see what A C looks like!”

    Morris’ campaign had not exactly turned into duck soup as a result of Shelby County mayor A C Wharton‘s decision, revealed earlier Monday, not to seek the Memphis mayoralty. But Wharton’s abrupt rejection of a blue-ribbon “Draft A C” committee’s appeals had certainly kept Morris, and rival candidate Carol Chumney, for that matter, out of the dead-duck category.

    And, as Morris’ quip indicated, it may also have relieved reluctant warrior Wharton of anxieties which, several reports had it, were abundant. Some of them concerned the prospect of a brutal, mauling mano-a-mano with his old friend and ally, Mayor Willie Herenton, an ex-pugilist never slow to throw campaign haymakers. Others had to do with intra-family matters.

    And, finally, Horatio at the Gate was not exactly the right game for the laid-back county mayor — whose dapper, reassuring nature was one of his main attractions for those, including many influential members of the city’s business community, who had beseeched him to run against a once-popular city mayor whose ability to inspire confidence in the community at large may have run its course.

    It had to be remembered, after all, that Wharton had been courted to run for this or that office many times over the years, but only once — in 2002, faced with an open county mayor’s seat and promised, then as now, with ample support from the Memphis business establishment — had he answered the call. A reelection race in 2006, against a largely nominal challenge by then county commissioner John Willingham, was a given.

    Wharton’s native reticence was touched upon Monday by an admittedly “disheartened” Rev. Bill Adkins, who, along with the Rev. LaSimba Gray, had been one of two co-founders of the “Draft A C” movement. Repeating his confidence — and that of most observers, seemingly confirmed by a new poll — that Wharton would have been elected, Adkins acknowledged, “But he was always aggravated by having to make the decision. That’s how he is. He called us up when he first heard about the committee and said, ‘What are y’all doing?'”

    The county mayor, still attending a mayors’ conference in Washington, D.C., released a lengthy, characteristically gracious statement later Monday. Noting that he had his reasons for demurring, Wharton said in part: “Some of these factors included family considerations, timing, and the impact on the community, but in the end, there was one factor that I simply could not ignore: I am in the right job at the right time to help Memphis the most.”

    He went on: “The county mayor is the highest elected office in our region, representing the hopes and dreams of 912,000 people. Shelby County Government is one of the largest local governments in the entire country, and it is in the role as its mayor that I can have the most profound and lasting impact on Memphis. … Perhaps, it is the nature of county government that it operates quietly and often below the radar. But that fact of life makes it no less important.”

    And so the dream harbored for so long by so many of an A C candidacy died — neither with a whimper nor with a bang. Rather, with a smile and a shrug.

    • Meanwhile, the mayoral field appeared set. The same Commercial Appeal poll (done by Steve Ethridge, who had prepared all of the others so far, in whole or in part) that had showed the county mayor an easy winner had City Council member Chumney deadlocked with Herenton in a Wharton-less field, with Morris running third and Willingham (making his second race for city mayor) and former FedEx executive James Perkins well behind in the lower single digits.

    Both Morris, who has enough of a bankroll to enlarge his beachhead with the voters as the campaign wears on, and Chumney took comfort from Monday’s news, and both released dutiful statements commending Wharton as they resolved to continue pressing their own efforts.

    In any case, as Thursday’s filing deadline approached, much voter attention had turned to the rapidly growing roster of City Council candidates. The long-rumored decision by council mainstay Jack Sammons not to seek reelection was confirmed during the week by a Sammons announcement, and his Super-District 9, Position 3, seat was rapidly attracting comers — amomg them, prominent Democratic activist Desi Franklin and former interim legislators Shea Flinn and Mary Wilder.

    The departure of incumbent Sammons, along with those previously announced, ensured that the post-election City Council will, like the County Commission that was elected in 2006, contain a majority of newly elected members.

    With that prospect, the appetite among hopefuls was growing (see also Viewpoint, p. 17), and all 13 seats were likely to see some animated contests. Check the Flyer Web site for updates, and watch this space for continued analysis of the races.

    • By the time this column is read, a winner will have been declared in Tuesday’s special election for state House District 89. After a post-primary period in which the race was largely absent from political radar screens, it began to blip again — mainly through the efforts of teacher/restaurateur Steve Edmundson, who had launched an independent write-in campaign as a challenge both to highly favored Democrat Jeannie Richardson and to Republican nominee Dave Wicker, still largely an unknown quantity.

    Mindful that only 250 or so voters had taken advantage of early voting, Richadson’s cadres quickly ginned up some campaign events and a GOTV effort to counter both Edmundson and what they suspected might be a sandbagging, late-breaking Republican effort on Wicker’s behalf.

    • Unless former Memphis school board member Michael Hooks Jr. holds to his resolve and stands trial for his role in the Tennessee Waltz saga and somehow overcomes, the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office will shortly end up with a perfect record of convictions for the several defendants who have been indicted in the sting since May 2005.

    That was the situation this week after Chattanooga state senator Ward Crutchfield pleaded guilty in federal court here last Thursday to accepting a “gratuity” (i.e., a bribe), and former Memphis state senator Kathryn Bowers followed suit on Monday.

    Both Crutchfield and Bowers made an effort to appear at peace with the situation, having both reached the “acceptance” stage of Elisabeth Kubler-Ross‘ famous death cycle, and the diminutive Bowers, who freely acknowledged having done wrong in taking some $11,500 in inducements from undercover “E-Cycle” agents, was more successful.

    On the way to her rendezvous with the media outside the federal building, Bowers limped a little. “It’s the shoe,” she said, pointing to a pair of new taupe-colored open-weave high-heeled shoes. She had dropped something on her foot on the 4th of July, “and it still hurts,” she said. “I’m only 4 feet 10, and when you’re that short, you’ve got to do something to help you stand tall.”

    But the glummer and more taciturn Crutchfield had his moment of poise, too. Asked by a reporter what words he would have for his wife of some 50 years when he returned home to Chattanooga with his once lofty reputation in shreds, Crutchfield replied: “Hon, I’m home.”

    Crutchfield will be sentenced on November 28th, Bowers on October 24th, both by trial judge Daniel Breen.