Categories
Cover Feature News

Midtown’s Next Big Thing:

With suburban sprawl derailed by energy costs and subprimes and downtown sleeping off the condo hangover and arena fatigue, attention has shifted to some potentially big deals in Midtown.

One of them, proposed by Memphis developer Henry Turley, would redevelop the Mid-South Fairgrounds as a sports complex, Kroc Center, hotel, and shopping center. A second proposal by Miami-based WSG Development Company would put a 28-acre retail center in a blighted area near the intersection of Poplar and Cleveland. Both projects would cost several million dollars in public and private investment, rely on complicated tax schemes to attract national retailers such as Target or Wal-Mart, and won’t show tangible results for at least another year.

Big-store fever has also spread to downtrodden Overton Square, where there is some buzz but no firm proposal about a new grocery store and hotel.

That something needs to be done is obvious. Over half of the fairgrounds property is vacant, and someone driving on Cleveland from the abandoned Sears Building to Methodist Hospital on Union Avenue would think Midtowners mainly shop for auto parts and title loans. The question is what? Midtowners are a diverse, activist, and choosy bunch — fiercely loyal to what they like and fiercely critical of what they don’t like. And downtown’s Peabody Place is a reminder that multi-million-dollar mixed-use retail projects with the best planners that money can buy can fail.

by Justin Fox Burks

If any of this works, the developers will owe a debt to small businesses and neighborhoods that invested in Midtown without fanfare or tax benefits, relying on personal risk, sweat equity, customer loyalty, and creativity. They range in size from the residential redevelopment of the abandoned Interstate 40 expressway corridor to restaurants and small businesses in Cooper-Young and the Evergreen Historic District.

Big or small, successful projects filled an unmet need — new houses with historic architecture, a walking trail on an abandoned railroad line, a Home Depot in a building that had failed twice as a grocery store, a movie theater in Overton Square that outlived a much bigger competitor downtown, or a family-run neighborhood restaurant whose owner trained at Bennigan’s, the bankrupt national chain. They succeeded because people wanted them and liked them. They got little or no assistance from tax credits or quasi-government agencies like downtown’s Center City Commission. There were no debates about development fees or corporate logos. Collectively, they help make Midtown the unique group of neighborhoods that it is.

First, a little disclosure. I have beaten this horse before. Fifteen years ago I coined the slogan “Midtown Is Memphis.” The driving force was driving. Some Midtown parents were tired of hauling our children to Cordova and Germantown for shopping, movies, and sports, especially when two Midtown teams would play each other. Artist Tom Foster and I put the slogan on a bumper sticker that is still around, no thanks to me. Our design was full of graphic icons of happy little scenes. Midtowner Calvin Turley reduced it to its current white-on-red or green-on-white incarnations. Less was more. His son Rayner and daughter Lyda sold a ton of them.

by Justin Fox Burks

The campaign fizzled. The school board and Park Commission collaborated on a track, two baseball diamonds, and an alleged soccer field next to East High School, the sum of which is a sportsplex in name only. So the bumper sticker was overdesigned, and the sportsplex was underdesigned. There is probably a lesson in there somewhere.

Anyway, here are some Midtown projects with real staying power and comments from some of the people who got it right and made it work.

The Overton Park Expressway Corridor: A generation has grown up since Midtown just west of Overton Park was marked by a swath of weeds, vacant land, and broken foundations 400 yards wide and nearly a mile long. Even residents have a hard time telling where the old houses end and the new ones begin on some blocks. From 1992 until about 2003, more than 200 new bungalows and four-squares were built to historic guidelines on land bulldozed for an expressway 30 years earlier. (More recently, another Midtown residential infill project followed similar guidelines after the old main library was demolished at Peabody and McLean.)

by Justin Fox Burks

Neighborhood leaders obtained historic designation for the Evergreen Historic District. The city reacquired the land and sold lots through real estate agents to former owners, builders, and prospective homebuyers. Construction quality was uneven, but architectural guidelines were enforced, and within a decade most empty lots were gone.

“Three things were done well,” says Dexter Muller, former director of the city’s division of Planning and Development. “The first was working through issues of ownership and acquiring the land. At the state and federal level that was a challenge, and I really give credit to my assistant, Cindy Buchanan [currently director of Parks and Recreation]. The second thing was a plan that was realistic in the marketplace. There was so much demand you didn’t need government incentives. And third, the planners and local government set it up as a historic district and imposed guidelines to make it compatible with what was there. That was huge.”

by Justin Fox Burks

Corridor homeowners, like Shelby County commissioner Deidre Malone and her husband, made the planners look good. The Malones bought their lot in 1993, hired an architect, moved into the house in 1994, and have been there ever since.

“We went through the Landmarks Commission process and everything,” said Malone, who was working in Midtown at WMC-TV at the time. “They wouldn’t let me have shutters on the house. But I moved on. Our kids went to Snowden and Central, which are great neighborhood schools. We love the feel of Midtown. It’s a very diverse community, and the neighborhood association is fabulous.”

by Justin Fox Burks

Malco’s Studio on the Square: Opened in 2000, Malco’s boutique four-screen theater has been an unqualified success while Muvico’s Peabody Place megaplex, which was built at about the same time, has closed. The theater was developed by Memphis-bases Southland Capital, which planned to redevelop all of Overton Square but has sold its interest. The section south of Madison is still struggling, with several vacancies but a tantalizingly large parking lot that keeps the rumor mill grinding.

“I’m a Midtown proponent and convinced our people it would be a wise thing to do,” says Malco’s James Tashie. “Parking is critical for us. We wanted this theater to be bigger with more screens but parking prohibited it. Still, we’ve held our own very well with the big guns downtown.”

Tashie said the developers got some tax credits “but that didn’t tip the scales for us.” The original concept of an “art house” was discarded for more standard fare, but the theater is still very different from, say, Malco’s Paradiso in East Memphis.

“Our theater fit the niche of Midtown. We do a lot of film festivals and special events there, and we have a sitting area and a wine bar. I think it works for that reason. But if you don’t have movies people want to see, it doesn’t matter what you build.”

The V&E Greenline: An abandoned railroad line in the middle of a stable neighborhood was a challenge for the Vollentine-Evergreen community. Rhodes College professor Michael Kirby was one of the neighbors who bought the land in 1996 and turned a potential trouble spot into a walking and biking trail.

by Justin Fox Burks

The 1.7-mile Greenline is much shorter than a proposed railroad abandonment bike trail to Shelby Farms, making acquisition costs and construction much cheaper. Organizers got less than $10,000 from government sources to build a bridge and a storage building and develop a master plan. They raised many times that amount in donations from Keeler Iron Works and other businesses and in donated labor for the original clean-up and ongoing maintenance.

“We used to think the area between University and McLean was unsafe,” said Kirby. “People had a vision of a trail that was nicer than what we had, and the more it was improved, the more people started using it. I remember seeing a 75-year-old lady in the neighborhood walking her dog, and the fact that she felt safe enough was an indication of our success.”

Stewart Brothers Hardware: Stewart Brothers, at Madison and Cleveland, is the ultimate Midtown survivor, founded in Memphis in 1887 and occupying the same location since 1935. Like a sprawling old house, it has expanded several times as space became available, but it’s the antithesis of the big-box store. A sled, a child’s bike, tools, and the $1 bin are all on display a few steps from the cash register and entrance.

“Our specialty is customer service,” says Chris Dempsey, 36, one of five family members working in the store purchased by his father, Jim Dempsey, in 1975. “We’re able to greet customers when they come in the door, take them to the product they want, and answer any questions.”

Stewart Brothers has never received any tax breaks, unless you consider being next to MATA’s $60 million Madison Avenue trolley extension a break. Dempsey doesn’t. Construction was “a terribly negative process” that cut business 35 percent. He knows of no benefits and says “the road back up was a lot harder than the fall.” He would welcome the proposed development at Poplar and Cleveland and the demolition of blighted properties.

Fresh Slices Sidewalk Café & Deli: If you’re not looking for Fresh Slices and its neighbor, Diane’s Art Gift and Home Store, you won’t find them. Midtowner Diane Laurenzi, a respiratory therapist at the time, opened her store in a former Masonic Lodge in the middle of the Evergreen Historic District in 2002. The restaurant opened in 2004 and an upstairs gallery this year. They get no tax credits.

Fresh Slices owner Ike Logan had several years experience with the Bennigan’s restaurant organization. Eight family members work in the restaurant, which emphasizes neighborhood ties with dishes named after residents.

Laurenzi features neighborhood artists in her gallery and store, which became profitable after two years. She makes it a point to make friends with her customers and carry a variety of items at different price points.

“The neighborhood is very loyal to our business, and part of that is we have something to offer them,” she says. “I think they want to see us do well.”

The Levitt Shell in Overton Park: “Save Our Shell” was a rallying cry for decades, but the outdoor bandstand and shell appeared to be doomed until the Mortimer Levitt Foundation came to the rescue thanks to a chance encounter.

Memphis musician David Troy Francis was performing at a restored shell in Pasadena, California, and had dinner with Elizabeth Levitt Hirsch. He told her she had to come to Memphis.

“We had lunch at the Brushmark and then walked over to the shell,” said Barry Lichterman, president of the shell’s board of trustees. “She looked at it and said, ‘This is it. I want to do this in Memphis.'”

The Levitt Foundation donated $250,000 for renovation and $500,000 for operating costs for the first five years. The city of Memphis contributed $500,000, and an additional $600,000 was raised from private sources.

Lichterman credits the shell’s initial success to architect Lee Askew, who lives nearby, and to local donors. The Levitt donation is only a start. It costs $450,000 a year to operate the shell, so “without local participation this is not going to happen.”

Cooper-Young Business District: Midtown’s most successful neighborhood restaurant and entertainment center is 20 years old this year. It has overcome safety fears and a lack of parking garages with a police mini-precinct, an annual street festival, and constant marketing.

“This is a tribal gathering place, and the one element you have to have is safety,” says Charlie Ryan, a Cooper-Young investor and president of the Cooper-Young Business Association.

Ryan is proud of the district’s independent business owners and absence of franchises.

“That is the beauty of it,” he says. “Nowadays, you do a lifestyle center and talk to all the big boxes and wind up with something boring. Cooper-Young is not boring. It is unique.”

The district does not receive the sort of tax credits that are commonplace downtown and in the proposed fairgrounds and Poplar-Cleveland projects.

“We got a HUD grant in 1991 for $500,000 for street improvements, street trees, and antique lights, and some of the individual owners got historic credits for facades on their buildings,” Ryan says.

“We operate on the Karl Rove theory of commercial. The truth is what you say it is. Every few months we came up with something to get some publicity. The festival is a once-a-year public relations event that says it is okay to come to Cooper-Young, and we are a cool place. You don’t have to put in gazillions of dollars if you’ve got creative people. There is a lot to be said for just working with what you have and building on your strengths.”

by Justin Fox Burks

Categories
Cover Feature News

Old Reliable

The Commercial Appeal has a rich history. It has earned bragging rights for publishing a newspaper through good times and bad — even when the odds were stacked hard against that prospect. In the 167 years since its founding, the Mid-South’s only surviving daily newspaper has endured floods, a variety of wars, a plague, the Great Depression — and the death of Charles Schulz.

During the Civil War, the CA‘s press earned the nickname “Old Reliable,” because the Confederate broadsheet never stopped publishing, even when it was in exile. The CA survived and thrived as radio matured and as television sucked away advertising dollars. But recent layoffs, suspension of corporate dividend payments, and scaling back regional home delivery have the newspaper’s subscribers, stockholders, and employees wondering how reliable Old Reliable really is these days.

The Commercial Appeal is not unique. All around the country, newspapers are experiencing similar problems. Publishers are laying off and buying out employees, reducing page sizes, printing fewer pages, running five days a week instead of seven — trimming costs at all costs.

The CA has been quietly but steadily scaling back its home deliveries since March. In September, an article in the Northwest Arkansas Business Journal reported that the CA would significantly reduce home deliveries, noting that readers could still access “a replica” of the paper’s content online.

Shortly thereafter, a letter to subscribers announcing additional delivery cutbacks and an increase in subscription rates was issued by CA circulation manager Karl D. Wurzbach.

“We’ve seen newsprint increase by over 30 percent, while health-care expenses grew by over 21 percent in 2008 and will go up another 20 percent in 2009,” the letter began. Wurzbach did not mention the impact an economic recession might have had on readers trying to squeeze a newspaper subscription into their budget.

Wurzbach’s letter was blunt and specific. Paper carriers — private contractors who are responsible for their own vehicle maintenance — now require fuel subsidies, he wrote, adding that delivery costs were up by as much as $75,000. “[It’s] costing us more money to print and deliver than we earned in revenue. No company can survive using that business model,” he continued.

“We will cease deliveries to another 5,600 subscribers in areas that have been receiving The Commercial Appeal for over 100 years … . Simply put, we are making very difficult decisions to help our business survive.”

But the model Wurzbach describes isn’t a complete one for the newspaper business. Newspapers make most of their money from advertising, not circulation through single sales or home delivery. And advertising prices are determined by the size of a publication’s readership. The more readers a paper has, the more it charges for advertising. Considering that the CA has experienced steadily declining circulation for years, the decision to cease home delivery to nearly 10,000 readers seems puzzling.

“In many cases, rural delivery or distribution outside the newspaper’s primary market has little value to advertisers,” says John P. Murray, vice president of audience metrics for the Newspaper Association of America. “Home delivery may be for true believers, but single-copy sales demographics are essential to advertisers, as is readership from other newspaper sales channels,” he says. “Newspapers will continue to make economic decisions and discontinue distribution where it doesn’t make sense.”

Murray manages “Circulation Facts, Figures and Logic,” an industry survey, and conducts research projects that include studies of single-copy buyer behavior. He works primarily to provide marketing support for circulation executives and publishers.

According to Murray, the circulation metric for newspapers has changed over the last 10 years. These days, its value to advertisers isn’t judged only in terms of paid circulation. The question, he says, is “whether or not a newspaper can deliver an advertiser’s targeted audience cost-effectively and whether the advertiser gets results.

“In many cases, a newspaper’s total audience that it can deliver to an advertiser is larger than it was five or 10 years ago,” Murray says. He factors in a publication’s online traffic and the readership of auxiliary publications, such as Skirt, the women’s lifestyle magazine the CA brought to the Memphis market in 2007.

November brought more discouraging news for Cincinnati-based E.W. Scripps Co., The Commercial Appeal‘s parent company. Echoing a pattern among big-legacy media companies that have seen stock values wither, Scripps’ board voted to eliminate dividend payments to shareholders.

The dividend suspension and the halting of stock share buy-backs come on the heels of the company’s long-expected unbundling of its lucrative cable and digital media properties from its struggling newspaper division. However, since E.W. Scripps and Scripps Networks Interactive Inc. split in June, both properties have taken significant hits, with the cable division losing 26 percent of its share value, according to a recent article in The New York Times. The newspaper division fared even worse, losing 51 percent of its share value.

A spokesperson for Scripps declined to comment, referring inquiries to CA publisher Joseph Pepe and editor Chris Peck. Pepe did not respond to repeated requests for comment. Peck said he could not comment about anything at this time.

On November 6th, Editor & Publisher, a newspaper industry trade journal, reported that E.W. Scripps was cutting 400 jobs companywide as part of a restructuring effort to weather “rapidly changing business condition[s]” and to save the company $15 million.

The company’s third-quarter report was not encouraging, citing local advertising down 16 percent, classified advertising down 28 percent, national advertising down 31 percent, and online advertising down 12 percent.

“The picture we’ve been given is bleak,” says Mark Watson, past president of the Memphis Newspaper Guild and current president of the Tricouncil, a coalition of the newspaper’s three unions. “Car sales are down. Real estate is down. … You’ve probably heard radio ads from car-dealer associations letting people know that there’s money out there available for car loans. We called Scripps’ papers in Florida the Gold Coast papers, because they brought in so much revenue from real estate advertising. Now that’s all gone.”

Two days after the E&P article, the CA published a story explaining that the company had no choice but to eliminate 57 employees — 9 percent of its total workforce. According to a statement issued by Pepe, the “painful” restructuring would help the CA to “survive the current downturn in the Greater Memphis economy, then prosper when the economy improves.” The article said the CA would focus more of its resources on “building digital media products, advertising, and content.”

The most recent departures from 495 Union Avenue include employees from every part of the newspaper’s operation: editorial, advertising, and even management. Not officially counted among the missing are newspaper carriers — private contractors who lost their jobs when the CA cut home delivery to rural areas in Tennessee and Arkansas. It’s all part of a slow, steady layoff that began in earnest six years ago, when the newspaper entered into protracted and, as of yet unresolved, contract negotiations with all three of its labor unions.

“I’m happy with the progress we made during negotiations last Tuesday and Wednesday,” says Watson, who acknowledges that there’s still quite a bit of unrest among CA employees. For all of the recent bad news, it’s the most upbeat report Watson has delivered to the Flyer since the negotiations started. “We made real progress on grievance and arbitration issues, which are technical and probably not very interesting to readers,” he says.

The sticking point for Watson and the unions is management’s desire to eliminate language in the contract protecting employees from outsourcing, which has become prevalent in the newspaper industry. While there is nothing preventing the CA from outsourcing jobs — as evidenced by the year-old decision to outsource certain functions of the advertising layout department to a company in India — the guild’s current contract prevents the CA from eliminating employees in order to privately contract or ship their jobs overseas.

“There have been good developments,” Watson says, noting that a 4 percent raise was put on the table. For employees who haven’t seen a raise in six years, this is not insignificant. “The problem,” Watson says, “is that all the other stuff they want to have as conditions is intolerable.”

Watson understands how rapidly the economic landscape has changed since negotiations began.

“It’s been a dismal year for the news media generally,” he says. “But we’ve been told that The Commercial Appeal is still making money. Not as much as it has in the past, but it’s still profitable.”

Watson says that although the recent round of layoffs is disappointing, the restructuring process has generated some excitement in the newsroom — as well as new concerns for the bargaining unit.

Union contracts previously separated employees into categories such as A-1 journalist for reporters and A-2 journalist for employees whose primary functions were more clerical in nature. New media (online and Internet) was a separate category altogether. According to Watson, these distinctions will be blurred in the future, creating new opportunities and new pitfalls. The guild now has to fight to ensure that employees hired as writers and editors aren’t subject to punitive actions if they fail to excel in new media positions far removed from their original field of expertise.

“For example, I wouldn’t make very good on-air talent on Appeal TV, which is a feature on our websites,” says Watson, a soft-spoken reporter and copy editor.

But despite these lingering labor-management disputes, Watson seems more optimistic than in recent years. His hopefulness is somewhat tied to the election of Barack Obama, who supports Employee Free Choice Act legislation, which would amend the National Labor Relations Act, making it easier for employees to join unions.

“I’ve always liked John McCain, but if there was ever a year when I was going to be a single-issue voter, this was it,” Watson says. “The labor movement has taken such a terrible beating over the last eight years.

“I think there may be a way that we can reach an agreement within the next year,” he concludes, hopefully.

In 2003, as staff reductions at the CA began in earnest, with a mix of layoffs, early retirements, planned attritions, and contract buyouts, editor Peck drafted and published a “blueprint” for what it means to be a major metropolitan newspaper in the 21st century. It wasn’t so much a blueprint as it was a series of questions:

“How can we shift to a more Web-centric news operation, where more of our work is designed to maximize the strengths of the Internet even as we feed the print side of our newspaper?” he asked.

“This work will be difficult, chaotic, and frightening on some days … and we’re going to have to do it all with a talented, if smaller, workforce. … The tough nut of the newspaper’s challenge looks like this: Do more with less, even as we build a more interesting, relevant Memphis newspaper.”

Today, those questions — or challenges — remain largely the same. In the past five years, page size has shrunk in an effort to cut costs, and the number of pages has dropped along with advertising dollars. The staff has been steadily downsized. And now, with cuts in home delivery, the paper’s geographic footprint also has shrunk.

Just how much “less” can the CA hope to make “more” with?

In recent weeks, rumors have circulated that the next step in the CA‘s shift to a web-based business model will be to cut publication from seven to five days a week.

That’s news to Watson. “There hasn’t been any talk about cutting back the number of days we publish,” he says.

But anything is possible, says Murray, citing an article about Arizona’s Green Valley News and Sun announcing plans to eliminate its Friday print edition in October. “So far, only a few newspapers have reduced frequency, and they are smaller newspapers. There’s no indication that any larger newspapers have plans to do so.”

In this case, no news is good news. Old Reliable is still hanging in there, seven days a week.

Joseph Pepe

Categories
Cover Feature News

Rebuilding Millionaires Row

Nearly 150 people, mostly clad in black suits and dresses, are gathered on the lawn of the Woodruff-Fontaine House on a chilly All Saints’ Day evening. They’ve come to pay their respects to Memphis and Shelby County Film and Television commissioner Linn Sitler, who’s lying in a casket in front of the century-old mansion.

Of course, Sitler isn’t actually dead. She’s just pretending. And as her friends — U of M dean Richard Ranta, filmmaker Mike McCarthy, and NARAS head Jon Hornyak — deliver faux eulogies, they’re also raising funds to breathe new life into the Victorian Village neighborhood.

The “Night at the Village” fund-raiser, which also featured a requiem choral evensong at St. Mary’s Episcopal Cathedral on Poplar and a bagpipe procession down Orleans Avenue, raised $3,400 for the Victorian Village Community Development Corporation (CDC).

That money, along with a combination of public and private funds, will go toward the CDC’s plan to revive what was once the city’s most upscale neighborhood. At the turn of the century, Italianate Victorian and Second Empire mansions lined Adams Avenue, but the city’s “urban renewal” project of the 1960s razed most of those structures. Now only a handful of historic homes are left in Victorian Village, and the CDC plans to use them as a springboard for new development.

“Between the Victorian Village’s boundaries — Danny Thomas, Poplar, Manassas, and Madison — there are 25 structures on the National Historic Register. This is the only concentration of historic architecture from that century in the city,” says Scott Blake, the executive director of the CDC and a longtime resident of the neighborhood. “The way to support those historic assets is to build a residential neighborhood around them.”

Since the village falls in the Center City Commission’s central business improvement district, the agency commissioned a redevelopment study by Looney Ricks Kiss Architects in 2004. The resulting plan calls for single and multi-family housing built in a style to complement the existing Victorian-era structures. It also suggests improvements to the two city parks in the area, sprucing up existing apartments and businesses, and connecting the museum houses with a green boulevard for walking tourists.

Though the plan was developed four years ago, it is finally gaining momentum, with the first few homes now built along Jefferson. The city also hopes to reopen the Mallory-Neely and Magevney museum houses, and millions of dollars in improvements to the adjacent medical district are well underway.

“We want places for the doctors and staff of the medical district to live in the area, and we’re looking for housing that runs the price spectrum,” says Beth Flanagan, director of the Memphis Medical Center. “Victorian Village will be such a gem for the Medical Center.”

Millionaires Row

In 1845, a pair of brothers from New Jersey traveled to Memphis to expand their carriage-building business. Though one brother returned to the Garden State, Amos Woodruff decided to stay put. He became head of the Memphis City Council, and president of two banks and owned a railroad company, a hotel company, an insurance company, a cotton business, and a lumber firm.

by Justin Fox Burks

Gate detail

By 1870, Woodruff’s rise to prominence had earned him the money to build a magnificent house at 680 Adams Avenue, which was then considered the outskirts of the city.

“He told his wife if she’d come down from New Jersey to live in Memphis, he’d build her a really nice house,” says historian Jeanne Crawford, a docent at the Woodruff-Fontaine House. “From looking at tax records, we’ve determined that it cost him $40,000 to build this house. You couldn’t build a garage for that now.”

Woodruff’s home, now open for daily tours as the Woodruff-Fontaine House, became one of many ornate mansions along Adams, known as Millionaires Row. Wealthy cotton merchants and the city’s most elite families lived in the neighborhood.

“Their entertainment was very neighbor-oriented. They played bridge with one another and poker. And when they had a bash, it was a real bash,” Crawford says. “I’m sure it was a charming time for those with money.”

But as the city grew, many of the families eventually migrated east to newer neighborhoods such as Central Gardens. By the 1950s, many of the mansions sat empty. Others had been converted into tenement housing.

“It was kind of seamy. There were lots of winos living in these houses, and my house was in shambles,” says Eldridge Wright, the neighborhood’s longest surviving resident, who lives in a grand 1880 home across from the Mallory-Neely House. “It was not a very attractive neighborhood back then. But to me, even the houses that were dilapidated had great charm.”

Wright moved into the neighborhood in 1955, first occupying a brick carriage house that once sat behind his family’s Victorian home on Jefferson. The main home was razed by the city in the mid-’60s, when Jefferson was widened. Its destruction was part of a massive urban renewal project that demolished most of the Victorian homes in the area.

Wright moved to his house on Adams shortly after his family’s main home was razed. But he wasn’t about to stand back and watch the city destroy the entire neighborhood.

“We formed a group to try and save some of the homes. They had plans to demolish the Fontaine House and Mallory-Neely House, and we were able to stop that,” says Wright, who is lovingly referred to the “Mayor of Victorian Village” by current residents. “At the time, I’d rather have been drawn and quartered than give a speech in front of the City Council, but I knew that I had to make a point to save these places.

“I appealed to Mayor Henry Loeb that this place could be such a nice tourist attraction if Memphis would save these homes. That idea appealed to him, and I think it was on that basis that we were finally able to preserve a few of them,” Wright says.

Thanks to Wright’s efforts, a few remnants of the lavish Victorian era in Memphis remain. The Woodruff-Fontaine House, now under city ownership but leased by the Association for the Preservation of Tennessee Antiquities (APTA), is now the only home open to the public.

by Justin Fox Burks

Jeanne Crawford

The other city-owned museums — the Mallory-Neely House at 652 Adams and the Magevny House at 198 Adams — were open for tours until 2005 when they were temporarily closed due to city budget cuts.

Operated under the city-funded Pink Palace Museum system, the homes originally were slated to reopen this year. But Pink Palace officials still are working on a funding plan, which should be complete by the end of the city’s fiscal year.

The James Lee House, an 1848 mansion next door to the Woodruff-Fontaine House, sits empty, its dark and gloomy windows reflecting Orleans and Adams avenues. Though it’s managed by the APTA, the nonprofit preservation group doesn’t have the funds to renovate and open it for tours.

“We’re in the middle of a proposition for the CCC to put [the James Lee House] out for public bid for renovation and restoration,” Blake says. “A private entity, whether it’s one of the hospitals wishing to use it as office space or just someone who would like to open a bed and breakfast, would actually purchase the house and do the restoration according to strict standards.”

Across from the Woodruff-Fontaine House, restaurateur Karen Carrier’s successful Mollie Fontaine Lounge operates in an 1886 home that was built as a wedding gift for Mollie Fontaine Taylor, whose family occupied the Woodruff-Fontaine House after the Woodruffs moved out.

The lively tapas lounge at 679 Adams was Carrier’s first home in Memphis after relocating here from New York in 1985. She still runs her catering business, Another Roadside Attraction, in the carriage house behind Mollie’s. Carrier first converted the home into Cielo, a white-tablecloth French restaurant, in 1996, when she moved her family to East Memphis. Cielo got a hip, new facelift last year when it became Mollie’s.

“At Mollie’s you can take in the ornate architecture,” Carrier says. “You don’t have a tour guide telling you where to go. You can sit down, look around, and really take it all in.”

Some of the other historic structures, like the Lowenstein Mansion and the Pillow-McIntyre House, are privately owned and used as residences or law firms. But thanks to the urban renewal era, the neighborhood also is peppered with unattractive apartment complexes, warehouses, and industrial buildings from the 1960s.

Rising from the Ashes

Jocelyn and James Henderson consider themselves pioneers. The couple, an attorney and Memphis policeman, respectively, relocated from Harbor Town to a new town home on Jefferson in June.

“We can shape the Victorian Village neighborhood,” says Jocelyn, seated at a breakfast nook in her modern kitchen. “We can mold it into a safe neighborhood where my son Jordan can play outside.”

The Hendersons’ home is one of three new town houses adjacent to Blake’s two historic homes — built in 1863 and 1867 — at the corner of Jefferson and Orleans. Blake, who runs a company that provides design resources for museum exhibitions and the performing arts, designed the new houses.

by Justin Fox Burks

Eldridge Wright

The single-family homes, built in a style that complements the nearby Victorian architecture, are models for the future in-fill housing called for in the Victorian Village redevelopment plan. But Blake says there’s room in the neighborhood for multi-family housing as well.

“It’d be great if families came in and tried to build Victorian mansions, but that’s not likely,” Blake says. “But someone could build a six-unit condominium that looks like a Victorian mansion. You could even do mansion-style office buildings, especially considering how close we are to the Medical Center.”

As for Jocelyn Henderson, she loves being able to walk downtown from her home, and some days, when she’s scheduled to work at the Shelby County Juvenile Court, she can walk across the street to the courthouse on Adams. But she says a few things are missing from the neighborhood — namely, a small grocery store, a coffeehouse, and a bigger selection of restaurants.

The Victorian Village redevelopment plan calls for more mom-and-pop retail shops, restaurants, and other amenities. Currently, ICB’s Discount Store is the village’s only retail market, and there are just a few neighborhood restaurants, like Neely’s Barbecue and Mollie Fontaine Lounge.

When Carrier lived in the neighborhood in the mid-1980s, she remembers the area being a tourist hotspot, since all three museum homes were open to the public.

“There were so many tourists, they would tour the museums and then come knock on my door, thinking my house was open to the public too,” Carrier says.

After the city closed two of the museums, the tourist crowds faded. But with plans to reopen the Mallory-Neely and Magevney homes, there’s talk of building a green boulevard or park that would connect the museum houses on Adams to Jefferson.

“To make the neighborhood walkable, you have to have cross streets and not just the long blocks that we now have running east to west,” Blake says. “We need to make some short streets that run north and south, and we’d like to do them with a green median.”

Not much can be done with unattractive existing structures, like the Shelby County maintenance facilities, the Crime Victims Center, and the Memphis Fire Department maintenance facilities.

“If those were to become available for reuse at some point, we’d have to look at which ones would be worth keeping and which ones could have something else built in their place,” says Steve Auterman, the master plan’s designer from Looney Ricks Kiss.

Auterman says the group is working with owners of some of the dated apartment buildings in the neighborhood, like the 312-unit Edison high-rise on Jefferson.

by Justin Fox Burks

Jocelyn and James Henderson

“They may decide to improve the structure that’s already there or take part of it down and replace it with more desirable apartments,” Auterman says.

Pest Control

There are two parks in Victorian Village — Morris Park on Poplar and Victorian Village Park on Adams. Victorian Village Park is a mostly empty green space dotted with a few park benches, which typically double as beds for the homeless. Morris Park’s only draw is a public basketball court, but most residents are afraid to use it.

“Morris Park is a little scary,” Blake says. “There’s drug dealing and prostitution in the park, and it’s not welcoming to the community.”

The city parks department is working with the Victorian Village CDC on a plan for enhancing the parks and making them safer.

“But to deal with the park, you have to deal with the area around it,” Blake says. “Every building that faces Morris Park, like the Memphis Housing Authority offices and Collins Chapel, needs to develop a program where there’s 24-hour observation in the park. We may even build some townhouse apartments that look over it. When you have a presence like that, it sends the roaches scuttling.”

Homeless people from the nearby Union Mission on Poplar often find their way into the village, creating the perception that the area is unsafe. Though violent crime isn’t typically a problem, burglaries persist.

Since the Hendersons moved in this summer, they’ve had two car break-ins.

“James was parking his car on Jefferson, and three weeks ago, someone busted out his windows,” Jocelyn says. “They also tried to break into my mom’s car, which was parked on Jefferson, a couple days later.”

A check of Memphis Police crime statistics from the past 30 days reveals 21 thefts from vehicles in a half-mile radius of Adams and Orleans. There were seven residential burglaries and two business burglaries reported during that same time.

But Carrier says the break-ins along Adams Avenue have dropped since she hired security for Mollie’s.

“When I had Cielo, there was a big crime problem. People would be all dressed up and they’d walk to their cars and their windows would be smashed,” Carrier says. “But from day one at Mollie’s, we’ve had security from the time we open until we close at 3 a.m. We haven’t had any more trouble.”

Blake says most of the vagrants likely enter from the village’s northern border along Poplar Avenue. The plan calls for some much-needed sprucing up in that area with high-density rental and condo units built in a style similar to the apartment buildings from the 1920s across from Overton Park in Midtown.

“Right now, that area is homeless shelters and trashy pawn shops and the back side of Juvenile Court. So you need a good imagination to picture what it might look like,” Blake says. “Poplar is our front door to downtown, and right now, it’s like Whack-a-Mole with all the people hanging out in the street.”

Though it may be hard to control the homeless population, the county’s planning to build a 30,000-square-foot forensic center along Poplar in the Juvenile Court parking lot. Because of the nature of the operation, the building will require security and that may curb some of the crime.

There’s no set timeline for the Victorian Village redevelopment plan, and funding will come from a variety of sources. Victorian Village recently was selected as a Preserve America Community through a White House initiative that recognizes communities that are using their historic assets for economic development and community revitalization. The designation makes Victorian Village eligible for certain federal grants.

New commercial businesses and multi-family rental developments may also be eligible for PILOT tax freezes through the CCC.

For now, Blake is happy to see a few new residents and increased enthusiasm in the neighborhood.

“Part of our mission is to raise awareness, and it’s great to see people taking an interest,” Blake says. “For so long, this place was just languished and forgotten.”

by Justin Fox Burks

Scott Blake

Categories
Cover Feature News

The Baby Grizzlies

A little more than a year ago, Grizzlies general manager Chris Wallace inherited a capped-out loser of a team built around a core duo of well-compensated and pushing-30 post-season underachievers: Pau Gasol and Mike Miller. It was a team coming off a dreadful 22-win season with a roster divided into veterans looking for a way out (Gasol, aging point guard Damon Stoudamire) and young players itching to take over (Rudy Gay, Kyle Lowry, eventual draftee Mike Conley).

With this mixed-message roster drifting listlessly last winter toward another lost campaign, Wallace decided the time for half-measures was over, jettisoning Gasol for four prospects/draft picks and cap room in a wildly controversial move and completing the demolition this summer by packaging Miller in a bold draft-day trade to net blue-chip rookie guard O.J. Mayo.

Wallace and owner Michael Heisley have gone “all in” on a future that fans — actual or potential — might only glimpse this year. Heisley has been specific about the developmental arc to come, dubbing it a “three-year plan.” For the first time in years, the Grizzlies enter a season without Gasol and Miller as the foundation of the roster. Instead, this year’s model will belong to a different pairing: Gay and Mayo, a tandem with more raw talent and grit than any core duo the franchise has assembled.

Reaping the fruits will take time, though. The NBA is a man’s league, and young teams tend to lose — in bunches. And the 2008-’09 baby Grizzlies are some kind of young. With an average age of 24.3, the Grizzlies will boast the league’s third-youngest roster, after the Golden State Warriors and Portland Trailblazers. But even that comparison is misleading. Both the Warriors and Blazers have veteran players in the rotation and raw kids riding the pine. The Grizzlies are opposite. Over-30s Antoine Walker and Greg Buckner are unlikely to see much time. The team’s prospective nine-man rotation — Conley, age 21, Lowry, 22, Mayo, 20, Gay, 22, Quinton Ross, 27, Hakim Warrick, 26, Darrell Arthur, 20, Darko Milicic, 23, and Marc Gasol, 23 — is, by far, the league’s youngest. The Grizzlies will open the season with two rookie starters — Mayo and Gasol — and could well add a third in Arthur at some point this season.

It’s a group bursting with athleticism and upside, but there are also important qualities this assemblage lacks: experience, established track record, a balance of skills. All of the team’s guards are used to handling the ball, not playing without it. None of the team’s power forwards are proven, well, power players. There is clearly work to be done. A final product won’t take the floor until at least the fall of next year.

And inexperience isn’t just an issue on the court. Entering only his second full season as a head coach, Marc Iavaroni is tied with Sacramento’s Reggie Theus as the league’s fourth-least-experienced head coach. After a rocky first season plagued by a dismal record in close games and damaging playing-time decisions (sticking with a wildly ineffective Casey Jacobsen until Heisley intervened), Iavaroni has as much to prove as his players.

Change You Can (Hopefully) Believe In

This year’s Grizzlies roster contains only six (of 14) players who finished last season with the team. But the eight new faces are only the start to what will be a very different basketball team everywhere, except in the standings.

For years, the Grizzlies have been built around the combination of Pau Gasol’s post play and a deep core of three-point shooters. With the departures of Gasol, Miller, and Juan Carlos Navarro, this year’s team can’t depend on either of those offensive elements. Instead, Iavaroni will have to fashion his talent around a different set of offensive strategies, ones that will likely replace post play and three-pointers with more fastbreaks, more free throws, and more mid-range shooting.

Gay and Mayo will be the team’s primary scorers, and both seem capable of being Top 10 scorers in the league someday. An electric athlete with a surprisingly deft shooting stroke and improving ball-handling ability, Gay exploded in his second season, becoming the first second-year player since superstars Lebron James, Dwyane Wade, and Carmelo Anthony to top 20 points per game. He also showed signs of becoming something this franchise has never had: a go-to scorer with not only the ability but the desire to take big shots at the end of games.

by Larry Kuzniewski

Meet the new Gasol: Pau’s burly brother Marc

Mayo, who has been a hoops mini-legend since junior high, is already the team’s best pure shooter, but he may not be quite the player fans are expecting. Rather than the highlight-reel athlete Mayo’s Q-rating suggests, the rookie guard instead has looked more like a solid assassin: a player whose unspectacular athleticism could be overcome by deft shooting, tough-nosed defense, and a preternatural court presence. But as a rookie dependant on outside shooting for much of his offense, Mayo will have games this season where he rains jumpers from all over the court. He’ll have others when his shot isn’t falling, and he’ll put up some ugly box-score lines.

For the Grizzlies, one challenge will be maximizing Gay’s and Mayo’s offensive skills without devolving into too much one-on-one play. This means putting the ball in the hands of primary playmakers Conley and the burlier, woollier (if you can believe it), younger Gasol, who looks like he can replace his older brother’s passing ability if not his scoring. And it means fostering the kind of chemistry and unselfishness than can help get secondary players the kind of shots they need to succeed.

The Grizzlies will try to utilize their superior team speed — especially in the form of point guards Conley and Lowry — to maximize transition opportunities and to attack off the dribble in halfcourt sets, freeing up the team’s trio of mid-range-shooting frontcourt players — Gasol, Warrick, and Arthur — for open looks off pick-and-pop plays and kickouts.

There’s been a lot of hand-wringing lately about the team’s lack of three-point shooters, both from within the organization and among the media, but despite the presence of Miller and Navarro, one of the Grizzlies’ problems last season (albeit a minor one, all things considered) was the team’s over-reliance on three-point shooting. Last year, the Grizzlies were fourth in the league in three-point attempts per game but only 22nd in three-point percentage.

The lack of proven three-point threats will be less of a problem this season if the team has the good sense to dial back its attempts in favor of more drives to the hoop. In this sense, the preseason seems to be a pretty good indicator of shifting strategy. After averaging 21.7 threes per game last season, that number was down to 15.9 this preseason, while free-throw attempts increased from 25.6 to 30.5. (This change will not work out well, however, if the team can’t improve on its dreadful 66 percent preseason free-throw shooting.)

Another thing that should help the Grizzlies offense this season is a reduction in turnovers, something that should happen naturally after point guards Conley and Lowry played their first full NBA seasons a year ago.

by Larry Kuzniewski

Memphis Grizzlies coach Marc Iavaroni

Finally Getting Defensive

After finishing 21st in the league in offensive efficiency last season with a full season of Miller and half-season of Pau Gasol, the Grizzlies would do well to match that production despite the change in players and strategies.

That means if this year’s team is to improve, the heavy lifting will most likely come on the defensive end, where last year’s team was 28th (third from the bottom). Ordinarily, getting younger is not a recipe for defensive improvement, but this year’s Grizzlies should be able to buck that bit of conventional wisdom through a combination of increased emphasis and better personnel.

After watching the Boston Celtics march to a title with a league-best defense spurred, in part, by the hire of “defensive coordinator” assistant Tom Thibodeau, Heisley decided he wanted a defensive specialist on his coaching staff too. This led to the hire of longtime college and NBA coach Kevin O’Neill to focus on reinventing the team’s defense with an approach that’s both more traditional and more aggressive.

In this transformation, the team should be helped by a massive increase in quickness and defensive mentality on the perimeter. Last season, since-departed slow-footed perimeter defenders Miller, Navarro, Casey Jacobsen, and Stoudamire accounted for nearly 30 percent of the team’s total minutes played. This season most of those minutes will be soaked up by Conley, Mayo, and off-season free-agent find Quinton Ross, which should result in a massive defensive improvement along the perimeter, forcing more turnovers and reducing the number of times opposing guards break down the Grizzlies’ “D.” Conley is stronger than he was his rookie season; Mayo has been surprisingly solid on the defensive end; and Ross is a quick, long-limbed defender with a track record of ably guarding the league’s top scorers. If Gay can improve his effort on that end, the Grizzlies have a chance to be pretty dynamic defensively along the perimeter.

On the interior, the team is likely to have bigger problems: Power forwards Hakim Warrick and Darrell Arthur are both undersized for the position and are likely to get punished some nights by bigger, stronger opponents. At center, Marc Gasol has proven to be quite unlike his older sibling in his toughness and willingness to engage in physical play, but his lack of foot speed will make him vulnerable to big men who are able to attack off the dribble and make it difficult for him to rebound out of his immediate area.

The team’s best frontcourt defender and rebounder is Darko Milicic, who has had substantial problems staying healthy and staying focused throughout his young career. The Grizzlies will ask a slimmed-down Milicic to play both frontcourt positions and guard the league’s best post scorers. It might be asking too much, but the team doesn’t have better options. Regardless, the team’s interior defense is unlikely to be worse than it was a year ago.

by Larry Kuzniewski

O.J. Mayo

With more agile, aggressive defenders along the perimeter and a couple of live bodies in the middle, the Grizzlies have a chance to provide the kind of forceful, opportunistic defense promised a year ago. Last season, the team was 17th in blocks per game and a pitiful 28th in steals, combining for 10.8 a game. This preseason, the combined blocks-plus-steals average has been 14. If that carries over into the regular season, it will feed into more transition opportunities.

But Will Anybody Care?

That’s the biggest question for a team that has been losing fans the past three seasons. With a bad economy and a tight lease guarding against the ever-present fears of relocation and with a lowered payroll mitigating financial losses despite falling ticket sales, the silver lining is that the team seems to have time to let this current crop of baby Grizzlies grow together and win back fans. But it won’t be easy.

It would be helpful to think of this year’s Grizzlies as an unusually promising expansion team, but after three straight playoff sweeps followed by two straight lost seasons, a dwindling fan base seems to have developed a “call me when you’re good again” attitude. It doesn’t help that so many potential fans are more interested in the exploits of the minor-league team sharing the building, one all but guaranteed on-court success in a noncompetitive system.

The Grizzlies, on the other hand, can’t be expected to win much this season. But, for starters, how about a more reachable goal: an entire season of purposeful basketball? The past two seasons have been derailed by, first, an in-season change to a lame-duck interim coach (Tony Barone) and then a sea-change trade of a veteran star (Pau Gasol). In both cases, the presence of “franchise savior” prospects in the looming draft rapidly turned losing seasons into summer-focused holding patterns. No more.

At least two of those three issues are unlikely to pop up this season: There’s no veteran star to jettison, and next summer’s draft doesn’t seem to boast any quick fixes. As to the coaching situation: Who knows?

If there’s a model for this year’s Grizzlies, it isn’t the past two seasons but the 2002-’03 squad, in which Hubie Brown took over for incumbent coach Sidney Lowe and guided a young core through a season-long improvement. That team only won 28 games, but it got better, was fun to watch, and set the stage for a massive improvement the following season. That’s a realistic model the 2008-’09 Grizzlies would like to follow but with players who have even more upside. The looming question would be: Is Marc Iavaroni the Hubie Brown of this scenario or the Sidney Lowe?

For more Grizzlies coverage now and throughout the season, see Chris Herrington’s blog “Beyond the Arc” at

memphisflyer.com/grizblog.

by Larry Kuzniewski

Rudy Gay

Coachspeak

Grizzlies coach Marc Iavaroni weighs in:

On rookie surprise Darrell Arthur:

“He had a very up-and-down mini-camp and summer league, so I didn’t know what to expect from him. But I do know he was working very hard. The kid has shown a lot of spunk and ability. I think he should definitely be in the rotation.”

On shaky offensive execution in the preseason:

“Even though our primary scorers — O.J. [Mayo], Rudy [Gay] and Marc Gasol, and sometimes Hak[im Warrick] — are going to have some things called for them, they’re going to have to understand: Even though it’s your play, it might not always be your shot. We’ve got to be better passers. We’ve got to do all the little things that add up to sharp execution, and if the shot goes in, great. If the shot doesn’t go in, either we get guys to shoot better, or we have to get better shooters.”

On developing on-court chemistry:

“I think it’s a process. You’ve got a known scorer in Rudy and a known scorer in O.J., and it’s a process for them to understand that there are only so many shots in a game.”

On improved perimeter defense:

“I think we probably have more juice there and more defensive orientation. Look at Quinton Ross. Look at Greg Buckner. Rudy’s capable. And, frankly, O.J. should be a better defender than Mike Miller. But he’s going through a lot of growing pains too. He’s a rookie. He’s going to make mistakes.”

On Rudy Gay’s development:

“He’s been pushing himself to be more than just the leading scorer. He has to be the leading man. Leading men have to do more than just look good. He’s got star potential, but he will be judged on how well others play with him, and that’s a lot of responsibility for a young kid who’s not used to being in that role and who’s now with a team that’s counting on him so heavily. It’s not going to happen overnight. Those are some big steps to take.”

On finding the right role for Darko Milicic:

“I’ve got to more narrowly define his role and get him feeling good about kicking butt inside and not worry about whether it’s a good shot or a bad shot. We can’t leave him on an island with the ball at 18 feet. I think that’s where he gets himself into trouble.”

On a potentially rough start:

“What will define us is our approach. If we’re going to come off the court every night having said we worked harder than our opponent; we did not back down, then I think we’re going to be building something. But if we’re going to start making excuses, start saying we’re flat, start saying we’re young, start saying we’re new to one another, then we’ll be building in failure. And that’s something that we cannot accept.”

To read the complete interview with Marc Iavaroni, see “Beyond the Arc” at memphisflyer.com/grizblog.

Seven Deadly Predictions

Going on the record about this year’s Grizzlies.

1. The Grizzlies will finish last in average home attendance. And it may not even be close. Last season, the Grizzlies finished 29th of 30 NBA teams, outdrawing the Indiana Pacers by about 500 spectators a game. This season, with the Pacers having jettisoned more of the players who alienated a once-strong fan base, the New Orleans Hornets a legit title contender, and the former Seattle Sonics embarking on their first season as the Oklahoma City Thunder, three of last season’s other bottom-five draws should be in line for a significant bump. With the economy in trouble, things will be bad in New Jersey, Charlotte, Sacramento, Milwaukee, and Minnesota, as well. But look for the Grizzlies to be four-digits worse than anyone else this season.

2. O.J. Mayo will finish third in an unusually strong Rookie of the Year race. Mayo will trail only Miami’s Michael Beasley among rookie scorers at just under 18 points a game, but both will come up short to Portland’s Greg Oden in the ROY race. Marc Gasol, who will start all season, will be a second-team all-rookie selection, while fellow rookie Darrell Arthur, who will end the season as a starter, will just miss all-rookie honors.

3. Rudy Gay will be a Top 15 scorer but not an all-star. After finishing 26th in scoring average last season at 20.1, Gay will push his scoring average closer to 23 per game, knocking on the door of Top 10 status. He’ll warrant all-star consideration in a conference lacking great small forwards, but the team’s dismal win-loss record will keep him out — this year.

4. Mike Conley will be wobbly early but will establish himself and get some Most Improved Player votes. Few players in the league are in as difficult a spot as Conley: trying to establish himself as an NBA point guard at age 21 with two other perimeter teammates in Gay and Mayo hungry for the ball. Conley will feel his way for a couple of months before taking off, establishing himself as one the league’s best young point guards heading into next summer.

5. A trade will be made — but not a big one. Behind Conley, Kyle Lowry will bristle at his bench role while Javaris Crittenton and Marko Jaric will struggle to find minutes. Something’s got to give. Look for Lowry to rehab his trade value after a bad pre-season and be shipped to a point-guard-needy team by mid-season.

6. Marc Iavaroni will survive the season; Antoine Walker will not. A bad economy and declining revenues will make Grizzlies owner Michael Heisley more cautious about buying out one coach to hire another, giving Iavaroni a longer leash than he might otherwise have, and the team will show enough improvement for Iavaroni to last the season. Despite a reluctance to take less money in a buyout, unneeded vet Walker will find some way to exit Beale Street Blue before the season ends.

7. The Grizzlies will finish 28-54. After a rough early start, the young guys will gel and improve enough for the Grizzlies to play competitive basketball down the stretch, setting the stage for a bigger leap forward next season. — CH

Categories
Cover Feature News

What a way to go

How can a child drown in a fountain in a public park, in full view of people who could have rescued him? How could a grown woman tumble out the window of a downtown office building? How does a man in a house get killed by an airplane?

Our city’s cemeteries are filled with the graves of men and women, boys and girls, who have died from all manner of causes — accidents, disease, war, even suicide. But there are a few whose deaths are considerably more unusual, even mysterious — deaths that make us stop and ponder their fates, and wonder, “Gosh, what a way to go.”

As Halloween approaches, we thought we’d share their bizarre farewells from this earthly pale with you.

UNDER HEBE’S GAZE

Of all of our city’s parks, downtown’s Court Square probably seems the unlikeliest place for anybody to die by drowning. After all, it’s blocks away from the Mississippi River, and the square’s historic fountain is too shallow to be a danger. Besides, there’s a cast-iron fence around the entire basin.

But when the massive fountain was unveiled back in 1876, topped with the statue of Hebe, that octagonal basin was actually a concrete moat more than six feet deep, often stocked with catfish, turtles, and — if you can believe some accounts — a couple of alligators. And there was no fence around it. If anybody thought the showpiece of Court Square was a hazard, they never said anything about it until the afternoon of August 26, 1884.

That day, 10-year-old Claude Pugh, described as “a newsboy and small for his age,” was sitting on the stone rim of the fountain, playing with a toy boat in the water. He leaned too far over and tumbled in, and since the bottom of the fountain was sloped, and slippery from algae, he couldn’t regain his footing.

What’s incredible is that the park was filled with visitors that day who could have saved the boy, but didn’t. “There were a number of men, women, and children in the square at the time,” reported the Memphis Daily Appeal, “and not an effort was made to save him. Stalwart men did not move a muscle, but stood silently by with staring eyes and gaping mouths.”

After struggling for several minutes, Pugh slipped beneath the surface. Newspaper editors expressed their outrage at the people who witnessed the tragedy: “Their hearts must have been made of stone, and the milk of human kindness in their breasts sour whey. More consideration should have been given a dumb beast.”

When a fireman was finally called to the scene, it took him more than 15 minutes to recover the boy’s body from the water. By that time it was too late. Little Claude Pugh, “the only son of a widow of good family and her chief pride and comfort,” was buried in Elmwood Cemetery. No gravestone marks the site today.

TRAGEDY AT EADS

For 15 years, Benjamin Priddy had been driving a Shelby County school bus, picking up and dropping off students at the little schools in the Eads, Arlington, and Collierville areas. During that time, his driving record had been impeccable.

But on October 10, 1941, Priddy made a fatal error that would result in the worst school tragedy in Shelby County history.

That afternoon, he picked up a busload of kids from the George R. James Elementary School, a little schoolhouse that once stood on Collierville-Arlington Road, just west of Eads. Driving along the two-lane county roads, he had dropped off all but 17 of his young passengers, when he made a sharp turn to cross the railroad tracks that once cut through the heart of the small farming community. Although he had a clear view of the tracks at the crossing, for reasons we will never know he pulled directly into the path of an N.C. & St.L. passenger train roaring toward Memphis at 50 miles per hour.

The tremendous impact almost ripped the bus in half, tumbling the wreckage into nearby woods. Priddy was killed instantly, along with six of his passengers; many of the other children were horribly injured. In those days, few families in the county had telephones. News of the tragedy spread by word of mouth, and frantic parents rushed to the scene, piled the victims into cars and trucks, and rushed them to the nearest hospital in Memphis, more than 20 miles away. “It was one of those sights you never want to see again,” one father told the Memphis Press-Scimitar. At Baptist Hospital, other parents found themselves “in a madly revolving world suddenly but surely spinning off its axis.”

No one aboard the train was injured, and investigators struggled to make sense of the accident. The engineer claimed the bus never slowed as it approached the crossing. Some of the children said they yelled at Priddy to stop when they saw the train hurtling toward them, but he didn’t seem to hear them.

The sheriff told reporters that Priddy had complained of a headache that morning and surmised that “he might have suffered an attack of illness.” Other townspeople conjectured that after driving this same route for 15 years and never encountering a train at Eads, Priddy had probably felt he didn’t need to stop there. On this fateful day, though, the train was running 20 minutes late, and the timing couldn’t have been worse.

Priddy was laid to rest in Bethel Cemetery near Collierville, and the six children were buried here and there in Shelby County. In Eads, the tracks were pulled up years ago, and the only reminder of the accident is a memorial plaque mounted high on a wall inside the town’s community center.

OUT THE WINDOW

The newspapers said Thelma Lloyd was “well-known in the interior decorating field,” and the 41-year-old woman had just returned to Memphis after working for several years with the Marshall Field Company in Chicago. On the morning of December 8, 1941, she left her house at 2258 Monroe, where she lived with her parents, and took the bus downtown to go to work at Seabrook Paint Company. Everyone who saw her that morning reported she was in “good spirits.”

She never arrived at work. After getting off the bus, she walked straight to the Medical Arts Building at 240 Madison and took the elevator to the eighth floor. The elevator operator, who later testified that Lloyd “seemed neither nervous nor excited,” said the woman walked to the restroom at the end of the hall after leaving his elevator. The time was 11:40 a.m.

A few minutes later, downtown workers saw a body plunge from an eighth-floor window of the Medical Arts Building. Nobody could tell whether she had jumped or fallen. Rushing to the scene, they found the woman in the alley below, terribly injured. She was rushed to St. Joseph Hospital, but died within a half hour.

Police were baffled. The woman’s purse was found on the washstand in the bathroom, but there was no suicide note. Although Lloyd’s brother, a former football star for Southwestern, said his sister had recently been ill, she gave no hint that she would take her own life. In those days, before air-conditioning, many office buildings had windows that opened. Police concluded it was possible that Lloyd had rested against the windowsill and then fallen backward out the window.

The Commercial Appeal decided the death was “apparently a suicide,” but the medical examiner was not convinced. On her death certificate, in the space for the cause of death, he typed, “undetermined.” Thelma Lloyd was buried in Forest Hill Cemetery.

LOST AT SEA

Born in Memphis in 1863, Granville Garth grew up in a prosperous home, the son of the president of the Germania Bank here. In his late 20s, he moved to New York to make his fortune, and within a few years, became president of the Merchant’s National Bank in that city.

But then his life took a strange turn. For reasons that were never revealed, in late December 1903, the bank’s board of directors persuaded their president to take a holiday, “to go far from the scenes and incidents distressing him,” as The New York Times put it. So Garth took the steamer Denver to Key West, where he visited for a few hours, then came back aboard when the boat departed for Galveston. When the ship docked in Texas several days later, Garth could not be found. The ship’s crew revealed he had “received cables and messages that seemed to drive him nearer to despair.” Authorities presumed he had jumped overboard somewhere along the way and determined he had done so on Christmas Day.

But why? Family and friends told reporters that the 40-year-old man had “mental anxiety of an altogether personal nature.” At the same time, they said, “What those troubles were are well-known to his friends, and they are known to many in society. Below stairs, in the servants’ world, they are as well-known as to the directors of the bank.”

Nobody could make sense of that. Garth’s brother-in-law later told reporters, “The public does not yet know what the trouble was. Mr. Garth was a disappointed man. He played a game of chess and lost.”

It was all very mysterious. The Garth family put up a stunning granite obelisk in Elmwood Cemetery, inscribed with the cryptic words, “LOST AT SEA.”

DEATH FROM THE SKY

In 1944, Norman Cobb worked as an air traffic controller for Memphis Municipal Airport. The 23-year-old probably never dreamed that he would be killed by an out-of-control airplane that smashed into his house.

Just before 11 o’clock on April 29, 1944, people in the vicinity of Poplar and Cleveland looked up when they noticed a U.S. Army B-25 bomber in distress. Some witnesses said the twin-engine plane actually flipped over in midair; others said the engines were sputtering or had quit completely. The plane zigzagged for almost a minute, dropped within a hundred feet of Tech High School, then plunged straight down into Cobb’s house at 322 North Claybrook.

The Commercial Appeal conveyed the horror of what happened next: “The brief staccato bark of a dying motor, a plane plummeting earthward, the terrible sound of impact, a dense cloud of black oil-smoke billowing skyward.”

Piloted by a Memphian, Captain Ralph Quale, the B-25 was on a training flight with two other men aboard when the engine failed just minutes after takeoff from the Memphis airport. The scene was utter chaos: “a maelstrom of shouting, running people, of siren-screaming fire apparatus and ambulances, of semi-hysterical women, of grim-faced men who wanted to do something but couldn’t.”

The women had good reason to be “semi-hysterical.” The house on Claybrook was occupied that morning, and everyone in it was killed instantly. Along with Cobb, the victims included his 22-year-old wife, Naomi, their 2-year-old daughter, Garlene, and another resident, 55-year-old Beatrice Withers. Cobb was home that morning because his shift didn’t begin until 4 p.m.

It took the fire department, aided by special chemical units from the airport, hours to quench the flames. No one ever determined the cause of the accident. The pilot never reported a problem with the airplane, and the B-25 had been inspected and overhauled just six days before. An officer with the Army’s Accident Investigation Committee admitted, “I am as much at a loss to explain the cause of the crash as the general public.”

In the days that followed, more than 20,000 people visited the crash site. Although seven lives were lost, everyone breathed a sigh of relief that the doomed airplane had somehow missed Tech High School, the Southern Bowling Lanes, Sears Crosstown, and dozens of other crowded businesses in the area.

Norman Cobb’s death certificate reads: “Accidentally burned to death when Army bomber fell on his home and exploded.” The remains of Cobb and his family were buried in Topeka, Kansas. His home on Claybrook was rebuilt, and there is no trace of the crash site today.

THE MISSING MAN

Just inside the entrance to Elmwood Cemetery is a stunning memorial, almost 20 feet tall, and topped with a lifesize statue of a gentleman named Smith. A stone lion crouches in front of the monument, which is adorned with plaques, columns, and other decorations.

But nobody is actually buried here, because Jasper Smith simply disappeared one evening while walking in downtown Memphis. It’s one of our city’s enduring mysteries.

According to historian Paul Coppock, Smith was a “well-to-do real estate man.” He lived with several sisters and nieces in a nice house on Orleans, near Madison. On the evening of May 29, 1899, Smith left home and told the women he would return before 9 o’clock. He never came back.

Much later that evening, some friends claimed they saw Smith leave a downtown saloon and head down a narrow alley called Whiskey Chute, running between Main and Front, just north of Madison. The next day, police found his horse and buggy several miles away, at Poplar and Belvedere, but no one ever saw Smith alive again.

Coppock writes, “Gradually, the town accepted a theory that thugs, who assumed he carried large amounts of cash, had jumped him in the dark and dumped his body in the river.” But there were other theories, among them a report that he had withdrawn $1,000 from his bank that morning and had planned his disappearance because “the women he was sharing a home with were driving him crazy.” But if you were going to leave town, wouldn’t you take all of your money with you? And rumors persisted that his family had killed him for their inheritance.

The newspapers held out hope for his return, with one story saying that Smith had probably decided to visit some of his real estate holdings in the area, though the reporter didn’t explain why he would do that at night and leave his horse and buggy behind. Even so, the article said that Smith “is expected to reappear in due season and in good shape.”

He didn’t. Years later, he was declared legally dead, and his sisters erected the monument in Elmwood. The rest of his family eventually was buried nearby, their graves marked by almost identical memorials.

A BOLT FROM THE BLUE

On the afternoon of June 6, 1913, several children were playing in the front yard of a home at 1674 Lawrence Place in Midtown. Without warning, a black thunderstorm swept through the city, and the children dashed for cover from the fierce wind and pelting rain. Six-year-old Aileen Embury scampered across the street to her own home at 1677 Lawrence Place.

She didn’t make it.

The Memphis Daily Appeal reported, “As she ran toward her home, a blinding flash of lightning appeared around her and the girl sank to the ground. Persons who rushed to her found her dead. The bolt that caused her death flashed directly to the child’s body. When it had gone, a life was the toll of damage done. No mark was left on shrubbery or houses nearby.”

The funeral service, as was the custom of the times, was held at Aileen’s home the next day. She was buried in Forest Hill Cemetery.

Categories
Cover Feature News

Title Talk

As a measure of how far the University of Memphis football program has come under head coach Tommy West, consider the fact that West and his staff openly encourage their squad to talk about a championship. They raised and pushed the topic in July and August, when the late-summer sun could melt an athlete’s motivation like an unattended ice cream cone.

“When I first got here,” says West, “I talked about our goal as always being to win a championship. That was unrealistic at the time. We weren’t good enough. Now, three of the last four years, we’ve finished one win away from playing for [the Conference USA] championship. That’s our goal now, and it’s what our players talk about. But it has to come from them, and it has to be realistic.

“We’ve come a long way. I often hear it’s harder to stay there than to get there, but I’m not sure about that. Because it’s a fistfight every day, trying to get there. You better be ready to roll your sleeves up, because there’s somebody trying to keep you from getting there every day.”

Having enjoyed winning seasons followed by bowl games in four of the last five years, the Memphis program has put together its most fruitful decade on the gridiron since the Tigers averaged seven wins during the 1960s under coach Billy Murphy. (It should be noted the team never played more than 10 games in a season during the Sixties, as compared to as many as 13 since West took over in 2001.) Success and stability are longtime partners, and West becomes only the fourth coach in Tiger history to open an eighth campaign when the U of M visits Oxford to face Ole Miss Saturday.

While West has some concerns entering the fall, surprisingly, they don’t involve the quarterback position, where untested junior transfer Arkelon Hall will take over for Martin Hankins, the second-most prolific passer in Memphis history.

“We’re pretty solid offensively,” says West. “I think I know who our people are. We’re gonna be a little bit different at running back. Curtis Steele is probably going to start for us there.” Charlie Jones — a senior transfer from Miami — should also get plenty of carries.

On the subject of his rookie quarterback, West likes the versatility Hall should bring. “His strength is throwing,” notes the coach. “I hope Arkelon is as good a thrower as what we’ve had; if he is, we’re going to be really good. And I think he can be. But he brings something [new] to the table: running the ball. He runs better than Danny [Wimprine] or Martin [Hankins] did. Both he and [backup QB Tyler] Bass are throwers who can run. These two kids run well enough to get out of trouble and create some problems for a defense.”

Whatever chances the Tigers have for their first Conference USA title will ultimately come down to the players on the field, those surrounding Hall on offense, and those providing the defense. Three of these players, in particular, are worthy of attention as the 2008 season begins.

Clinton McDonald would command a room without saying a word. Listed at 6′-3″ and 265 pounds, the senior defensive lineman has muscles where you didn’t know they existed. But it’s when McDonald speaks — shoulders up, eye contact, nary an “um” — that it becomes clear his current teammates will not be the last group to follow his lead.

“Clint is the leader of our team,” says West. “He’s well-respected amongst our team and coaches because of his work habits. He practices what he preaches. He comes to work every day and lives his life the right way. I would tell any young player, if they’re picking someone to follow, follow him. Do what he does. What we preach — accountability, from the time you get up ’til the time you go to bed — Clint does, every day.”

Last season, McDonald became the first junior to be elected captain at Memphis in more than 15 years. While West’s endorsement says a lot about what McDonald brings to the team, the fact that it was his teammates who elected him captain both inspired and humbled the native of Jacksonville, Arkansas.

“I was surprised,” recalls McDonald. “I was a junior at the time. When it was time to talk, people listened to me. It’s the way I showed my enthusiasm for the program. [No seniors] were opposed to it. Respect’s a two-way street; you’ve got to give to receive. They respected what I stood for.”

McDonald is surprisingly humble in evaluating what has placed him in a position where so many follow his example. “In order to be a leader,” says McDonald, “you have to come from where everyone else comes from. You can’t just enter the military and say, ‘Okay, I’m a general now.’ You have to have credentials and the same dedication everyone else has — just work harder at it. Being a leader, people look up to you, wherever you are. If my standards are low, everyone else’s standards are low.”

McDonald’s unit will be among the deepest and most experienced on the Tiger squad. Also returning this season are Greg Terrell, Freddie Barnett, Steven Turner, and Josh Weaver. Along with McDonald, this quintet combined for 182 tackles in 2007. If games are, in fact, won in the trenches, McDonald’s crew will be the difference makers.

by Joe Murphy

defensive tackle Clinton McDonald

“If you look at other rosters,” says McDonald, “the sizes are about the same, and the speed might be the same. But it’s heart. It’s guys going out there, making a difference. A body’s only as strong as the heart it carries.”

After the 2007 season, Tiger free safety Brandon Patterson was named an Academic All-America by ESPN, the first Memphis football player in 15 years to be so honored. And it was earned. A finance major, Patterson actually graduated in August 2007 and will be working toward his master’s degree as a senior football player this fall. (The 22-year-old graduate of Germantown High School spent the summer interning with an investment consulting firm.)

“I have a good support staff at the University of Memphis,” says Patterson. “And, of course, my parents who always instilled in me to put school first, then all other activities. You need to stay focused, both on graduating and what you’re doing on the football field. Don’t get off task. That’s what I’ve done.”

“Some people come to school to play football,” says McDonald, “and some people come to get an education. Brandon came to do both. You have to have a lot of heart — and a certain passion — to come out to the field at 5 a.m. [after you’ve already graduated].”

“You know what motivates me?” asks Patterson. “It’s just love of the game. I want to win. It motivates me every day.”

On the field, Patterson led the Tigers with three interceptions last season, and his 77 tackles are the most by a returning player. The role he plays in the secondary this season is a primary variable in West’s outlook for how far the team can go.

by Joe Murphy

wide receiver Duke Calhoun

“My biggest concern is our defensive backfield,” says West. “That’s where we have some personnel issues, as far as who’s going to be the backups, who’s going to play where. We’re still a work in progress. There’s a lot of competition going on there.”

Patterson will be complemented by two other defensive backs who got significant playing time in 2007: LeRico Mathis and Alton Starr. But if there’s a quarterback in the defensive huddle, it will likely be the player wearing number 2.

“Patterson is an example guy,” says West. “He’s not very vocal, and you don’t have to be. He does everything you ask him to do, and more. If there’s any question from a formation standpoint, Brandon’s the guy who can decipher out there. He’s like a coach on the field.”

“I have a lot of confidence in my teammates [in the secondary],” says Patterson. “We’re really versatile — guys who can play safety and cornerback — so we should be deep back there.” And the grad student doesn’t shy from the leadership that’s expected of him. “I’m not really vocal in the locker room,” he says, “but I am on the field, and my hand signals make sure everyone knows their responsibility.”

The quickest way to get West to smile is to ask him about his receiving corps. “Best I’ve ever had, anywhere,” he says without pause. “One of the keys to our team — not just our offense — is that we stay unselfish at wide receiver. Because we’re very talented. Rice has [all-conference wideout] Jarett Dillard, and his numbers are going to be incredible. But we’re going to spread the ball around, with all our guys getting shots. We can’t worry about who gets this and that.”

by Sideline Sports

Brandon Patterson

Certain to get plenty of both this and that is junior Duke Calhoun, a preseason all-conference selection by C-USA coaches. Barring injury and presuming he sticks around for his senior season, Calhoun will do to the Tiger pass-catching records what DeAngelo Williams did to the rushing chart. With 44 catches and 553 yards, Calhoun will pass Damien Dodson (147 catches) and Earnest Gray (2,123 yards) as the most prolific receiver in U of M history. (Calhoun caught 62 passes a year ago for 890 yards.) “I just go out there and play hard,” says Calhoun. “If I break records, I break them.”

“Duke’s a big-play guy,” emphasizes West. “He’s capable of blowing a game open at any time. We have to make sure he’s well; he had trouble with his knee, so he should be better than ever [after surgery].”

Mentioning the names of other receivers — Carlos Singleton, Steven Black, Maurice Jones, and Earnest Williams — West stresses, “You can’t double up on anyone. We’re just really talented at that position.”

Calhoun describes his fellow wideouts as “a pack” and dismisses any thought of one player needing — or asking for — more action than another. “We do a three-in, three-out rotation,” explains Calhoun. “We’re all leaders, and we all look out for each other.”

As for his new quarterback, Calhoun envisions a seamless transition from Hankins to Hall, with perhaps an extra dash of late-play drama thrown in. “[Hall] is impressive,” says Calhoun. “He can move, get away from people. He’s a thrower first, runner second, but he can move in the pocket, so a play is never over.”

There will be plays this fall when Calhoun and his cohorts finish a pattern, then have to break into an alternative route when Hall escapes a pass rush. Such are the type of game-changing plays upon which Calhoun has come to thrive. “We have to look for it, expect it, and make a big play happen,” says Calhoun.

Every college football coach — and every player — is optimistic on Labor Day. For the 2008 Memphis Tigers, it will be after the mercury finally drops that Tommy West and his squad get a true sense of this team’s chances to extend a decade of success unseen in these parts since Lyndon Johnson was in the White House.

“The most excitement for me,” explains West, “is the expectation level. It’s legit. I don’t like false talk. Through the years here, with our success, we’ve raised the bar. When we started, we talked about getting to a bowl game. We just wanted to get to a bowl game. Then we wanted to get back to a bowl game. Then we wanted to be a team that consistently plays in bowl games. Now, we’re there. The talk now is that we want to win a championship. We want to play in the [postseason] Liberty Bowl.”

“We have good team chemistry,” adds Patterson. “In years previous, we’ve had chemistry, but there’s something special about this team. We’re just really determined to go after a conference championship.”

As year eight of the Tommy West era opens in Memphis, the coach is emboldened by the growth of his program but convinced work remains to be done.

“I don’t know that you’re ever satisfied,” he says. “I take great pride in where we are, because of where we started. But I’m more committed now than ever to getting us to the next place. I’m pleased with what’s been accomplished, but in no way, shape, or form have we maxed out.”

Categories
Cover Feature News

Out of the Woods

Walking through the shaded canopy of the old-growth forest in Overton Park, retired forestry consultant Pepper Marcus points to a huge tree.

“That is one of the biggest wild cherry trees you’ll ever see in your life. It’s probably been here 500 to 700 years,” he says, admiring its grandeur. “There are very few cherry trees of that size anymore. They’ve all been cut for furniture.”

Eighteen years ago, Marcus led a fight to stop the Memphis City Zoo from developing land in the old-growth forest.

The zoo wanted to create a 20-foot-wide pathway through 17 of Overton Park’s 200 acres of virgin, thousands-of-years-old forest. The zoo also considered releasing deer and other animals into the exhibit.

“It became a big debate,” Marcus says. “We even took City Council people to the park and showed them the trees and the forest. We did a forestry study, and we countered all of the stuff that was done by the Park Commission and the zoo to support their case.”

Marcus argued that foot traffic and manmade pathways could kill rare, endangered plant and animal species in the old-growth forest and eventually the zoo scrapped the plan.

Now Marcus and others find themselves fighting an eerily similar battle.

In a controversial move earlier this year, the zoo bulldozed four acres of old-growth forest under its control to make way for its new Teton Trek exhibit, featuring the landscape and wildlife of Greater Yellowstone Park.

Many local forest advocates were outraged at the zoo’s actions, and in response, grassroots advocacy group Citizens to Preserve Overton Park (CPOP) reformed to stop further development in the zoo’s fenced area of the forest.

The group, which currently boasts 300 members, recently asked the City Council to restore 17 acres of Overton Park’s old-growth forest, currently controlled by the zoo and separated from the rest of the forest by a chain-link fence, to free and open public use. They also asked the council to update the zoo’s 1994 management contract with the now-defunct Park Commission; update the 1988 Overton Park master plan; and create long-term legal protection for the old-growth forest, such as a conservation easement or a state natural area designation.

“I think we’ve lost sight of the value of the forest,” says Naomi Van Tol, one of CPOP’s new leaders. “The zoo is the latest threat to the old forest, but there were other threats in the past and there will be other threats in the future.”

*

Flyer reporters recently walked through the area that will become Teton Trek with zoo spokesperson Brian Carter. The exhibit will include a geyser, a large log cabin called the Great Lodge — a tribute to Yellowstone’s Old Faithful Lodge — a place where zoo patrons can watch bears fish, a waterfall, as well as elk and timber wolves. Carter explained the exhibit will be like “a hike through Yellowstone.”

“It’s a little unlike anything we’ve done before,” he says. “The entire time you’re in the exhibit you have this open field of all the animals.”

In February, the zoo removed 139 trees from the Teton Trek construction site and saved 78 trees. They also plan to include 574 new plants and trees in the area.

Despite that, the zoo has encountered criticism for the deforestation and not being open enough about its plans for the future. In the spring, someone spray painted “4 acres, 10,000 years in the making, gone 4ever” on the fence outside Teton Trek. In July, a group of college students protested at the zoo, handing out flyers that asked, “How much zoo can we afford?”

CPOP originally formed in 1957, when the federal government attempted to build Interstate 40 through Overton Park. The group spent 14 years fighting the interstate, and in 1971, with a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, finally claimed victory.

Under its current incarnation, Van Tol says, “[We are] paying tribute to the people who worked so hard to protect what we have today.”

Van Tol takes her 2-year-old daughter to the zoo and to the park regularly.

“I want to expose her to the entertainment of the zoo and the old beauty of the old forest,” Van Tol says. “It’s all we have left [of] the Chickasaw Bluffs. When the first humans came here, that’s what they saw — ivory-billed woodpeckers, passenger pigeons. Humans are never going to see that again.”

Since the four acres for Teton Trek was cleared, CPOP’s focus is on urging the zoo to take down the fence surrounding the 17 acres of old-growth forest slated to be used for the Chickasaw Bluffs exhibit. Since the group felt that what happened in the Teton area was done without public input, they are concerned about the fate of the other 17 acres of old-growth forest the zoo controls.

Van Tol’s view is that the zoo already has acres of outdated infrastructure and exhibits, and that they should improve and expand within their current footprint.

“When you look at these older exhibits, some of them really need help. We encourage them to focus on their core,” Van Tol says. “And [the forest] is such an amazing symbol of our natural history as a city. It’s something that should not be closed off.”

*

Zoo representatives have been quick to maintain that the zoo is not expanding.

“We’ve had people ask us, ‘Is the zoo taking up more parkland?’ and we’re like, ‘no, no, just that 17 acres that had always been there,'” says Carter.

In 1986, planners and landscape architects Ritchie Smith Associates were hired to prepare a master plan for Overton Park. At the time, the park had about 10 vehicular entrances and routine gridlock.

“You had a lot of cut-through traffic,” Smith says. “People would cut through the park to save half a minute.”

Much of the park was also in a state of disrepair. At the same time, the Zoo, the Memphis Brooks Museum, and the Memphis College of Art wanted to expand.

The zoo was thinking of enlarging its parking lot into the greensward, the large swathe of meadow near Rainbow Lake. They also wanted their main entrance to be where veteran’s plaza is now, which would bring all zoo traffic through the heart of the park.

“The biggest challenge was the zoo expansion, because they were on about 36 acres and they actually were looking at a very significant expansion that would approach 100 acres total,” Smith says. “We convinced [former Memphis Parks director] Allie Prescott that the zoo should not expand in a vacuum, that they needed to be coordinated with the greater park effort.”

by Regis Lawson

CPOP member Naomi Van Tol often takes her daughter to the Memphis Zoo and Overton Park.

As part of the process, Smith and his associate Lissa Thompson estimate they held roughly 100 meetings with community members.

The landscape architects convinced zoo administrators that having their main entrance through the greensward would ruin the park and make getting to the zoo nearly impossible.

“There was a lot of give and take with these institutions,” Smith says. “The greensward is where people gravitate and there was a sense that the zoo was edging too far into the greensward.”

by Regis Lawson

Construction continues at the Memphis Zoo’s new Teton Trek exhibit.

When negotiations ended, the zoo doubled in size to 75 acres. It didn’t get the Rainbow Lake area — one of its early plans included a café near the lake — but it did get 16.5 acres of forest to the east, dubbed phase II, and 17.5 acres of forest to the southeast, dubbed phase III.

“We discussed that if they ever expanded to the phase III area, they should revise their plans for an exhibit that would be compatible with the old-growth forest,” Smith says. “The early plans called for a savanna exhibit and you don’t have to be an ecologist to know that you’ll be cutting down trees, so we didn’t like that.”

*

According to zoo officials, the 17 acres known as phase III will eventually be home to Chickasaw Bluffs, an exhibit with a low-impact boardwalk snaking through the forest.

by Regis Lawson

“We’re looking at doing construction … where you don’t bulldoze paths beside your boardwalk to build it,” says the zoo’s Carter. “You build it progressively, so as you lay a board down, you lay another one down in front of you.”

Each year, roughly a million people visit the Memphis Zoo. In addition, last week travel site TripAdvisor rated the Memphis institution as the top zoo in the country.

Adult tickets — for people ages 12 to 59 — are $13 each. Tickets for children ages 2 to 11 cost $8.

Zoo president Chuck Brady contends that the zoo offers the best opportunity for the broader Memphis community to experience the old-growth forest in Overton Park.

About 100,000 students visit the zoo each year on school trips, most at a drastically reduced admission fee. Brady says the Chickasaw Bluffs exhibit will give kids from some of the poorest parts of town a chance to learn about the forest.

“It’s a broad section of the community who have access to the zoo: wealthy, poor, young, old,” Brady says. “If we’re to show these people the forest, then it has to be through a visit to the zoo. There’s 160 acres of parkland that is only walk-in access, but those people will never see it. Our 17 acres is for the entire community.

“If you took down the fence, you’d have less access by the broad community and more neighborhood access.”

Brady came to the zoo in 1979 as its curator of mammals. He succeeded Roger Knox as president in 2003.

by Regis Lawson

In 1989, the city and Memphis Zoo, Inc., formed a public/private partnership where MZI would be the zoo’s fund-raiser and the Memphis Park Commission would run zoo operations. In 1994, the day-to-day management of the zoo was contracted out by the Park Commission to the Memphis Zoological Society.

Under that contract, the city pays the nonprofit Memphis Zoological Society $100,000 a month, or $1.2 million a year, to manage the zoo. Any zoo property — land, buildings, exhibits — is considered a city asset.

The zoo’s total operating budget is about $12.5 million each year, however, meaning that most of the funds used to operate the zoo come from admission fees, fund-raisers, and donations.

For Teton Trek, FedEx founder Fred Smith and his wife Diane gave the zoo $10 million, the largest gift from any single private donor, a fact that seemed to make the idea more palatable to council members, despite after-the-fact arguments against the clear-cutting by CPOP and others.

“It was a hundred percent privately funded. This exhibit is open [land] … so we can’t have big trees in this exhibit. I think if we take into consideration that we’re getting a $16 million private investment and it’s an out West scene,” says council member Reid Hedgepeth, “I don’t know how you can do that without clear-cutting.”

by Regis Lawson

Eighteen years ago, Pepper

Before work on Teton Trek began, the zoo met with Overton Park advocacy group Park Friends and showed them plans for the exhibit.

“Although we failed to get everybody to know what we were doing at Teton Trek, many, many people did know,” Brady says. “We did get the word out.”

The zoo’s 2006 summer newsletter, Exzooberance, featured a story on Teton Trek, reporting that construction was to begin in May 2007 and the exhibit would be finished in spring 2009.

In light of the Teton Trek criticism, however, zoo officials have pledged to be more open about zoo happenings and put more information on the zoo’s website.

Brady says that the 80 trees saved in the Teton Trek exhibit were saved “at a pretty significant cost” to the zoo, though he didn’t have an exact dollar amount.

“We had an arborist, and still have him, in order to keep the trees alive, not only during the construction process, but after the construction process,” Brady says.

As for the trees felled to make way for Teton Trek, Brady is not sure whether they were sold for lumber or scrapped.

“The contractor has control of that, but it was my understanding that they weren’t of value to be sold,” Brady says. He adds that some of the trees will probably be placed into the wolf or grizzly bear exhibits to create the effect of fallen logs.

When it comes to the old-growth forest, members of CPOP and Park Friends both want some sort of binding, legal protection for the forest. There is concern that once the zoo establishes a footprint on the 17 acres for one of their exhibits, it could easily decide to use that land for something else in the future.

The 1988 Overton Park master plam more than doubled the size of the zoo.

Brady says the zoo has no intention of changing its plans.

“If we were to do that — which we won’t because we’ve said from the beginning that we were going to develop the forest into a low-impact trail — it would be broadly disseminated to the community,” he says. “And I’m sure the community would scream and rightly so.”

When asked about CPOP’s request to remove the fence around the zoo’s phase III area, Brady says it’s not doable.

“All zoos have to be protected by fenced barriers,” he says. “The United States Department of Agriculture regulates us and one of their requirements is a secure perimeter.”

Brady also casts doubt on protecting the area with a conservation easement.

“We don’t own the land. We’re a management authority for the city,” Brady says. “It would be like promising somebody else’s land into a conservation easement.”

Brady does say, however, that he would be willing to write a letter to the city, formalizing the zoo’s intent to keep the land as a low-impact boardwalk and “preserve the ecology of the forest forever.”

Even though the exhibit will be low impact, Brady thinks Chickasaw Bluffs will be appealing to zoo visitors.

by Regis Lawson

Overton Park planner Ritchie Smith

“I think it will be a wonderful addition for everyone who is strongly in favor of the forest,” he says. “It’s a way of showcasing the forest to many, many more visitors while at the same time keeping it pristine.”

*

Though a low-impact boardwalk might not seem very controversial on its own, the sticking point seems to be whether the zoo can be trusted after Teton Trek.

“Obviously, those four acres are gone forever,” Van Tol told the City Council’s park committee. “I’m not here to cry about the Teton Trek clear-cutting. I’m here because the zoo plans to develop an additional 17 acres.

“If we allow the zoo to develop 17 more acres without public input, government oversight, and no written plan, we have only ourselves to blame if it happens again.”

Glenn Cox has been a member of Park Friends since the mid-’90s and its president since 1998. The park advocacy group hosts at least two clean-ups at the park each year and has developed a map of trails through the public parts of the old-growth forest. Most recently, Park Friends installed two information boards.

They plan to survey their 200-plus membership before taking a position on the Chickasaw Bluffs exhibit, but Cox says they were caught off guard with the deforestation at the Teton Trek site.

“We actually met with [the zoo] the month before. They brought schematics and architectural renderings and every one of them showed massive trees,” he says. “I think they avoided the issue by simply showing us pictures with lots of tree canopy, so we assumed the majority was staying put.”

Once they saw the deforestation at the site, Park Friends met with the zoo again to express their concerns. “They tore down a lot, and they’re going to plant three times more than they tore down, but you’re not going to get back old-growth trees,” Cox says.

Cox thinks the Chickasaw Bluffs boardwalk is probably the best method for the zoo to interact with the old forest. Park Friends has talked to community members who are scared to venture into the old-growth forest as it exists now and welcome the controlled access the zoo will provide.

Park Friends has a good working relationship with Brady and recently added a representative from the zoo to the Park Friends board. But the group doesn’t have any formal power over what the zoo can and cannot do.

Last year, the zoo began using part of Overton Park’s greensward for its overflow parking. The zoo charges visitors $3 a car for parking.

“Finally, we said, enough’s enough, and Melanie White, who’s been on the board longer than me, and I went over there and met with Chuck [Brady],” Cox says.

The two groups compromised — the zoo agreed to only park cars up to a certain line on the greensward and to not do it on rainy days.

And when the zoo crossed the imaginary line early this year, Park Friends had to remind them of the agreement.

“So they are back to their word, staying where they belong,” Cox says. “It’s not what we want. We don’t want them parking on the greensward at all, but it’s almost a matter of they don’t have any choice — where are these people going to go? — and we do recognize that.”

If the zoo hadn’t agreed to stay off the majority of the greensward, Park Friends’ only recourse would have been appealing to the city parks department and the City Council.

In another instance, the zoo constructed a building too close to the border fence. When Park Friends complained that park users didn’t want to see the back of a building and that the building was too close to the fence for green cover, the zoo moved the fence outward.

“We said, ‘no, you don’t have the right to move your fence,’ so they went back in and moved the fence back to where it was,” Cox says. “That’s like you taking the fence on your property and moving it back 10 feet on your neighbor’s [yard]. It’s not your property.”

Cox says the two groups have also had long discussions about a swathe of 15 to 20 feet of underbrush that the zoo has been clearing out along the back fence line. Zoo representatives told them the clearing is because coyotes have been digging under the fence and killing zoo gazelles.

“Part of our issues, with the tearing down of trees for Teton, for example, is you create new boundaries to the forest. When you create new edges to the forest, you change the dynamics of the plant and [animal] life. That’s another thing they’re not recognizing — their impact, how negatively it can impact the forest outside the fence.

“It’s another approach we’re trying to take with them, getting them to understand that the fence does not block the ecosystem. It just blocks human traffic.”

Park Friends would like to see some binding agreement that secures phase III as old-growth forest in perpetuity. Cox says he doesn’t think the zoo will change its plans for the area, but “I don’t want to get burned again.”

*

In the long run, the controversy might be good for both the park and the forest.

CPOP hopes council members will consider the group’s suggestions.

“We’re losing [the forest] acre by acre,” Van Tol says. “It’s being nibbled away and when you’re taking it out of a small forest, it adds up fairly quickly.”

Lissa Thompson, who helped draft Overton Park’s 1998 master plan, also cautions against overbuilding at the park.

“There is a history of passionate interest in Overton Park,” she says. “If you keep expanding, if you keep putting monuments in, it ceases to be open space and it ceases to be the park that people so loved.”

The controversy has also brought up the fact that perhaps the old Park Commission was a better system for public involvement. In 2000, the City Council and Mayor Willie Herenton disbanded the Parks Commission and brought city parks in-house.

“The Park Commission used to meet once a month and citizens could come in and say, ‘you need to clean up my park.’ We don’t have that opportunity now,” says Scott Banbury, founder of Midtown Logging and Lumber Company. “Where do people go to make a complaint? It’s very unfortunate we lost that forum.”

In 1990, with money from the Audubon Society and the local Sierra Club, Banbury hired a team of ecologists to do species assessments in the old-growth forest.

“More than 50 [bird species] have their nests and their babies there. There’s nowhere else around here where you can see that type of diversity,” he says. “Whatever happens with the 17 acres, I hope the rest of the forest will be protected in perpetuity somehow.”

Landscape architect Smith would like to see a more immediate change: “Maybe this will shine a light back on the forest,” he says. “It would be good for the city to have an urban forester on staff again.”

And though it doesn’t appear the city is ready to do another master plan for Overton Park, the zoo says it’s nearing the end of its current plan and will soon begin work on a new 10-year plan.

“I think in the next couple of months we’ll start to see some of this homework that we’re doing — the site surveys and other stuff — come to fruition, and we’ll have more to communicate,” says the zoo’s Carter. “I don’t think this is the end of the story. We’ve got a long way before we, or anyone else, comes to any conclusions about the future of that space.”

by Justin Fox Burks

Memphis Zoo president Chuck Brady

Categories
Cover Feature News

Endpapers-Summer Reading

Our Dumb World: Atlas of the Planet Earth (73rd Edition)

By the Editors of The Onion

Little, Brown, 240 pp., $27.99

It’s summertime, so let’s haul out the atlas and plan an exotic vacation in, say, South America. Argentina seems like a good choice, “a place where hundreds of former Nazis spend their final years reminiscing about the best way to cremate a Jew.”

Hmmm, maybe not Argentina. Okay, how about Brazil? “Boasting some of the sexiest people ever to be stabbed repeatedly at night,” we read, “Brazil is home to the most attractive victims of carjacking, robbery, and violent assault in the world.”

Yikes.

And Chile: “Preventing Argentina from enjoying the Pacific Ocean since 1918.” After all, the country is 3,000 miles long “and only 15 feet wide.” The detailed map points out such features as the “Paraguayan Taunting Tower.” Why taunt Paraguay? Because it’s “a nation widely known for not being widely known.”

Welcome to Our Dumb World, the wickedly twisted view of planet Earth by the editors of The Onion, the satirical newsweekly that — with its fake news reports — is the print and website version of The Daily Show. But with considerably more punch.

Saudi Arabia (“All Is Forbidden”) supposedly has laws that prohibit “laughing, frowning, smiling, and eating for one hour before beheadings.” To reinforce the horrible state of affairs for women in this nation, consider these two “facts”: “Leading cause of death for males: heart disease. Leading cause of death for females: males.”

Our Dumb World provides an overview of our planet — complete with each country’s profile, map, historical highlights, and even commentary on their flag. (The French tricolors “can be detached in case of emergency surrendering.”)

You can only handle Our Dumb World in chunks — a continent at a time, perhaps — but how else would you ever know the “Bono-Awareness Rating” for every country on Earth? — Michael Finger

Inventing Niagara: Beauty, Power, and Lies

By Ginger Strand

Simon & Schuster, 320 pp., $25

Niagara Falls has become a quaint piece of Americana, like baseball cards, station wagons, black-and-white televisions, and Marilyn Monroe. Ginger Strand, a self-described lover of hydroinfrastructure, brings history, tightrope walkers, power companies, Viagra, nostalgia, urban renewal, casinos, and — most important — herself to the story in Inventing Niagara.

“A waterfall, however beautiful or sublime, is not inherently entertaining, especially if you can’t ride it,” Strand writes.

How, then, to write a book about a waterfall that will sell? To my surprise, Strand hooked me by making herself a combination of skeptical and jaded tour guide, dogged historian, and funny and iconoclastic writer. She pesters librarians, hangs out with female tourists called the Red Hats, drags her boyfriends on spur-of-the-moment trips, and haunts the casinos and tacky tourist traps in the American and Canadian cities of Niagara Falls.

She recalls Blondin, the French tightrope walker who crossed the falls dozens of times in 1859 and 1860, carrying his manager on his shoulders, cooking an omelet, standing on his head, and turning a somersault. We also meet Annie Edson Taylor, a 63-year-old woman who successfully went over the falls in a barrel in 1901, thereby diminishing its aura of invincibility and earning herself a fair amount of derision.

The falls have been landscaped, hemmed in, blasted with dynamite, sculpted, and even had the water shut off completely on the American side in 1969 for some high-grade cosmetic surgery to enhance their majesty. And it’s true that the flow is adjusted by the power companies to correspond with peak tourism hours.

The invention of Niagara Falls includes the natural wonder that captivated Mark Twain and others, the landscape that stirred park planners such as Frederick Olmsted, the honeymoon haven of the 1940s and 1950s (the linguistic proximity to Viagra is not accidental) reinvented as a gay and lesbian wedding capital 50 years later, and the tacky tourist trap that finally gave way to casinos, first in Canada, then on the American side.

The casino owned by the Seneca Indians is the only major moneymaking business on the American side, drawing 5 million visitors a year and trumping its Canadian competitors with free drinks, craps, and smoking, which are banned across the border. But it hasn’t saved downtown Niagara Falls, New York, which is something of a case study in failed urban renewal.

This combination of natural wonder, civic uplift, and gambling-based tourism naturally made me think of Memphis and Tunica, including this passage on the “Free Niagara” environmental movement in the 19th century:

“Sublime landscapes were not simply places to be exploited, but sites of spiritual uplift, the pride of a nation and the birthright of its citizens. Such idealism would no doubt be laughed out of town today. But are we really ready to dispense with the notion that our connection to a place is somehow important beyond economic impact?” — John Branston

Dear American Airlines

By Jonathan Miles

Houghton Mifflin, 180 pp., $22

We’ve all been delayed at airports, but does anyone want to read a novel that opens, “Dear American Airlines, My name is Benjamin R. Ford and I am writing to request a refund in the amount of $392.68”?

In this case, the answer is a resounding yes. Dear American Airlines starts as a refund-request letter but becomes something more complex, more hilarious, and thankfully much more imaginative. Jonathan Miles portrays Benjamin R. Ford as a compellingly flawed man whose outrage is sparked by an interminable flight delay while he is en route to a reconciliation with his estranged daughter.

Bennie is an ex-everything: ex-poet disillusioned with the power of art to change the world; ex-alcoholic whose relentless drinking landed him repeatedly in the hospital; ex-father all but banished from his daughter’s life by her mother; and ex-husband to an academic who could only laugh through the divorce. As he scribbles in his notebook, his letter to American Airlines becomes an impromptu autobiography, created as much out of boredom as out of regret and all the more affecting for it.

Bennie’s cross-country flight is not simply a means of reuniting him with his daughter but a journey of self-rehabilitation into something resembling a human. So it’s no surprise that he describes O’Hare, where American Airlines has marooned him, as a personal purgatory: It represents salvation not simply delayed but thwarted indefinitely. Yet his humanity is entirely in the eye of the beholder — in this case, the reader. Despite his “toolbox of personality disorders,” Bennie is an endlessly sympathetic character: funny, condescending, self-loathing, and achingly self-aware. He is one of those literary characters whose true talent and appeal lie in his ability to make a mess of his life, which makes him an endlessly entertaining companion not only for such a long layover but for an epistolary novel.

In fact, as Bennie writes pages and pages to some unnamed American Airlines customer service representative, Miles manages to bend the rules of the epistolary genre, turning the reader into a character in Bennie’s story. Alone and forsaken, he writes to pass the time but more crucially to keep himself company, making the reader assume the role of confessor, priest, even friend. In this way, Dear American Airlines engages you with unexpected emotional force, making you wish this unlikely novel were twice as long as your next layover.

Stephen Deusner

Rome 1960: The Olympics That ChangeD the World

By David Marannis
Simon & Schuster, 478 pp., $26.95

Here is a moment, reported by David Maraniss in his wonderful survey of the 1960 Olympics, that helps put in context what happened that year in Rome:

The flashy German sprinter Armin Hary had upset American hopefuls in the 100-meter dash and, in general, had summoned up comparisons to Jesse Owens’ equally remarkable triumph over his highly touted German counterparts in the Berlin Olympics of 1936.

Those had been Hitler’s Olympics, remember — after which a legend grew that the German dictator had snubbed the great black American athlete by declining to congratulate him or shake his hand. Whatever the facts of that, there developed something of a mini-crisis 24 years later when Owens, inquiring through intermediaries after the 100-meter event, was rebuffed in his request for a meeting with Hary.

Tensions relaxed when the German sensation, having completed all his events, apologized for having been in a privacy zone earlier and agreed to meet Owens, whom, said Hary, he had long admired. With TV cameras grinding and flashbulbs popping, the German noticed a pack of cigarettes in the old champ’s shirt pocket. “You smoke? That’s no good. No good!” Hary said. “I’m old now. It’s all right,” Owens responded.

It’s now 48 years later, and we know it’s not all right to smoke, even for iconic ex-Olympians, but on the eve of the Beijing Olympics, it is helpful to be reminded of the political context in which these international mega-events always occur, in 2008 as in 1936 and as in 1960, the Olympic year reviewed so well by Marannis.

The Rome Olympics saw the first fame of one Cassius Clay, to be known as the immortal Muhammad Ali, and they witnessed, among numerous other circumstances chronicled here, the early crystallization of rivalry between chemically assisted Soviet-bloc athletes and the developing generation of black American track-and-field stars who were Jesse Owens writ large.

The prolific David Maraniss, like the late David Halberstam, is one of those rare writers at home with both sports and politics. Rome 1960 is a must-read for serious students of either. — Jackson Baker

Petite Anglaise

By Catherine Sanderson

Spiegel & Grau/Doubleday, 292 pp., $24.95

Petite Anglaise is the story of Catherine Sanderson, an Englishwoman who, since her first French lessons, is obsessed with France and vows to eventually make Paris her home. France was “a hook to hang my daydreams on — so alluring, so exotic, so tantalizingly close,” Sanderson writes.

After graduation, she acquired a job as an English assistante to French students. And though she was living in France, she felt that she lived among the French, not with them. So Sanderson sought French friends and a French boyfriend, and eventually she found “Mr. Frog,” a Frenchman who fathered her child, “Tadpole.”

But family life became tedious, and busy work schedules slowly picked apart her relationship and her love affair with Paris. Then, one day at her secretarial job, she ran across Belle de Jour, the blog of a London call girl. This was the first that Sanderson had heard of blogging, and the idea of an anonymous online diary intrigued her. Thus was born Petite Anglaise.

Petite Anglaise is “a small, cute English girl,” and she stands for everything Sanderson wanted her life to be: “an English girl who has been translated into French.” What began as a simple account of an English girl uprooted to France, however, became an outlet for more intimate details of her life, and with the click of a mouse, Sanderson’s world turned upside down, the line between her life and Petite’s blurred with every keystroke.

Petite’s readers share her highs and lows, her waning relationship with Mr. Frog, and her struggle to find happiness. Through her words, the City of Light comes to life, and her adventures become ours. The best part, though, is that the story of Petite Anglaise doesn’t end on the last page of Petite Anglaise. Sanderson continues to blog on the website PetiteAnglaise.com, which boasts over 100,000 visitors per month. — Shara Clark

The Enchantress of Florence

By Salman Rushdie

Random House, 355 pp., $26

If you do a Venn diagram with one circle representing the writing of Salman Rushdie and the other that of Arturo Pérez-Reverte, Rushdie’s new novel, The Enchantress of Florence, would fit nicely inside the intersection of the two sets.

No question, Rushdie’s name is on the book’s spine. And the novel’s gorgeous language, ethnic tensions, and emotional scope are what we’ve come to expect of him. But the book’s subject matter and antiquarian interests are the stuff of a Pérez-Reverte historical potboiler.

The Enchantress of Florence is a globe-encompassing generational tale, with action that spans the 16th century. In it, a mysterious Florentine tale-teller has trekked thousands of miles to the city of Sikri in India to gain a personal audience with the Mughal ruler Akbar the Great. The guts of the novel are the story that the Italian tells Akbar — a story about three friends in Florence who lived 50 years earlier, one of whom is far too famous for me to name here. Rushdie steeps Florence (in the grips of the High Renaissance) and Sikri (under the aegis of its deity/sovereign) in the primordial soup of his imagination, brewing a potion that compels you to believe that the author’s magical realism is, in fact, historically accurate.

One primary difference between Pérez-Reverte and Rushdie is how each measures the human condition: For the former, the glass is half-empty. For the latter, it’s half-full with a poisoned wine; the world will kill you in the end, but it’s lovely going down.

The Enchantress of Florence is a page-turner with rich rewards. If the magic has worn off by the book’s end, well, that seems on purpose too. — Greg Akers

The Girl on the Fridge

By Etgar Keret, translated by Miriam Shlesinger and Sondra Silverston

Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 171 pp., $12 (paperback)

Talk about value! Talk about economy! There are 46 stories in Etgar Keret’s The Girl on the Fridge, a slim collection featuring several early stories by one of Israel’s most celebrated contemporary writers. Good news is, at least 35 of these stories are well worth the effort it takes to read them. Of that 35, a dozen or so are borderline brilliant, and in an impressive handful, Keret says more in a few dozen words than most gifted writers can say in a matched set of awfully long trilogies. Even his annoying, unfinished-feeling sketches go by so quickly that there’s not enough time to get mad at them.

The Nimrod Flipout, Keret’s previous collection in English, was well received. American cinephiles may also recognize him as the inspiration for the quirky 2006 anti-horror film Wristcutters: A Love Story. But The Girl on the Fridge feels like Keret distilled.

Keret’s words never fail to make an impression, though his miniatures seldom add up to a story in any conventional sense. Instead, he takes revealing, darkly comic snapshots of contradiction, paradox, dilemma, and desperation, moving effortlessly between lean Carveresque realism, the painterly prose of Italo Calvino, and the stark domestic absurdity pioneered by Eugène Ionesco.

Each story, whether it’s about a Jew who’s beaten for not hating Arabs enough or a neglected wife who superglues herself to the ceiling, plays out like a cheap but irresistible magic trick performed by a birthday-party magician who is as surprised as anybody when dead babies start popping out of his hat instead of rabbits or colored scarves.

Appropriately The Girl on the Fridge, which is unquestionably a mixed bag, leaves the reader wanting to see much more from Etgar Keret. And also a little less.

Chris Davis

The Garden of Last Days

Andre Dubus III

Norton, 535 pp., $24.95

Andre Dubus III credits his ability to write his controversial new novel, The Garden of Last Days, to writer Larry Brown. Dubus even dedicates the novel to Brown for professional and personal reasons, saying he couldn’t have written the book if he hadn’t known Brown’s work.

The Garden of Last Days, a story that began with an image of a wad of cash on a dresser, reveals a gritty, down-and-out world. The cash, Dubus realized, didn’t belong to a waiter or waitress but to a dancer in a men’s club. What started as a short story about a dancer coalesced with the news that some of the 9/11 terrorists frequented strip clubs in Florida. Dubus wondered what it would be like to be a woman and possess that “blood money,” but he also resisted inhabiting the character of a terrorist as the narrative demanded.

In the end, April, who dances as “Spring” at the “Puma Club for Men,” and Bassam Al-Jizani are just two of at least seven interwoven points of view. One of the more understated is the Puma bouncer, Lonnie, who senses microcosmic eruptions of potential trouble he calls “pockets.” Night after night he squelches those pockets, and when he learns of the 9/11 attacks, “it was like the whole club had erupted into a hundred open pockets, yet there was nowhere for him to go, no one to defend.”

Critics who contend that Dubus fails to offer new insight into terrorists miss the point of this absorbing novel. If anything, The Garden of Last Days is flawed by the author’s immersion in their religion and psyche, which borders on redundancy. Still, the novel succeeds because the terrorists are only one of several compelling and well-realized narratives masterfully strung together and imagined with the kind of realism Dubus shares with the man he came to know during the last years of his life: Larry Brown. — Lisa C. Hickman

The Turnaround

By George Pelecanos

Little, Brown, 294 pp., $24.99

The Turnaround is TV in book form: straight narrative, simple plot, characters broadly brushed. Author George Pelecanos locates the story in Washington, D.C., where, in the summer of ’72, a trio of bored, stoned, drunk, white teenagers drive into a black neighborhood and hurl a Hostess fruit pie and a racial epithet at their opposite number: three African-American youths strolling through the ‘hood.

The white boys speed off, only to hit a dead end. One flees into the nearby woods to safety. The other two turn back the way they came to face the victims of their drive-by shouting. The white boys plead for forgiveness. The black boys stomp one and shoot and kill the other.

The story picks up the four survivors 35 years later, a time that finds them still dealing with the scars from “the incident.” They reunite, and a temporarily successful drug heist, a failed extortion plot, personal redemption, and street and poetic justice ensue.

Pelecanos is an accomplished and decorated writer. His work on the HBO series The Wire garnered an Emmy nomination, and he brought home two Los Angeles Times book awards for his previous novel, The Night Gardener.

The Turnaround is an engaging, tightly written story. It offers a few little surprises and pulse-quickening scenes of violence. As one of Pelecanos’ characters might say, though (among the steady diet of clichés that bloat the dialogue), it is what it is: pulp pop, neither at its finest, nor its flimsiest. The Turnaround is fun but not essential reading — unless you’ve killed your cable for the summer to help meet those cooling costs and need your crime drama. — Preston Lauterbach

Fractured

By Karin Slaughter

Delacorte Press, 388 pp., $25

The six-page prologue to Karin Slaughter’s Fractured is so graphic and exhausting that some readers might be tempted to stop before the going gets rougher. However, the main text is free of violence, its thrust being the analysis of a brutal crime involving three teenagers in a ritzy section of metropolitan Atlanta.

After a false start by the Atlanta Police Department, Detective Will Trent of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation is placed in charge of the case. His first assistant is Detective Faith Mitchell, who is especially motivated to keep an eye on the buttoned-down but eccentric agent.

Although Slaughter enthusiasts place her in the company of Patricia Cornwell, her characters wryly acknowledge that the technology available to them nowhere near approaches the levels made popular elsewhere. Slaughter’s characters rely on observation and interrogation, and, occasionally, they parody the genre they inhabit. While waiting for lab results related to the case, for example, the lead investigators rummage through a stack of home pregnancy kits to determine if Will’s girlfriend is keeping a secret from him.

Professional competition, personal problems, and investigative techniques aside, Slaughter and her characters take their mission seriously. Lives are at stake. The quality of those lives is under scrutiny. And there is reason to believe that the investigators’ partnership will continue. With names like Will and Faith, no doubt they embody the impulse to improve the lot of victims and families Fractured by crime.

Linda Baker

The Other

By David Guterson

Knopf, 256 pp., $24.95

“I was also confronting a truly onerous tedium. … I felt possessed by the dogged futility,” says the narrator in David Guterson’s new novel, The Other. That narrator, Neil Countryman, is describing how he felt when he and his best friend, John William Barry, used pick axes to carve out a cave. Unfortunately, the scene is analogous to reading The Other.

The book is about two characters: one who rebels against the “hypocrisy of society”; another who lives happily as a teacher. Yet neither of these characters feels alive, and consequently, the reader doesn’t care what happens to them.

Guterson apparently believes that John William is intrinsically fascinating. One character even attempts to get a screenplay developed about John Williams’ nutty social rebelliousness. But why bother? We’ve all known a John William who had such high standards, walked around on a soapbox, and was generally obnoxious.

What’s unique about John William is that he continues to pursue his ideals of “pure” living even after most of the counterculture kids would have gotten a job and developed a sense of humor. John William never does. He moves to the woods of Washington state, lives in a cave, and dies a hermit. But he doesn’t actually do anything except chip away at that limestone, the same way the reader keeps chipping away at The Other. At least John William gets a cave out of his work.

Over the course of the novel, all the reader feels is indifference toward these characters. Neil Countryman, for example: hilarious name, right? He keeps a journal and writes down every minute detail — like the number of cows he passes by. Guterson litters the novel with details like this, which drags the pace of the novel and fogs any characterizations.

But it’s not that The Other is terrible. While some passages are wonderfully written, others are tedious and you wonder why no one edited them out. There’s just no passion to pull you in. The Other isn’t good, but it isn’t bad. Worse than bad, it’s forgettable.

Alicia Buxton

Home Girl: Building a Dream House

on a Lawless Block

By Judith Matloff

Random House, 286 pp., $25

Real estate in New York is notoriously cost-prohibitive. Which is why, when foreign correspondent Judith Matloff and her husband decided to move to New York, they bought a former crack house in West Harlem, the “ground zero” of the country’s wholesale cocaine trade.

Well, that wasn’t the only reason.

After almost 20 years of covering events in Rwanda, Guatemala, Sudan, and Chechnya, Matloff decided she wanted to live “somewhere civilized.” She and her husband came up with a list of criteria: They wanted a city where they could both find good jobs, a house with an extra bedroom for visiting friends, a dining room big enough for their beloved 10-foot pine table, and a place with “at least one shooting a week on the street corner” to keep things from being too dull.

Matloff tells of run-ins with the muchachos — the drug dealers who come out in full force every morning at 11 a.m. — and Salami, the crack addict who squats next door and vows early on that she will be sorry.

But the horrors outside are only the beginning. Home Girl is also a memoir of a rehab, as the couple struggles to begin a family while fixing up their limestone Romanesque Revival. Broken stairs have to be replaced, lead paint has to be removed, and whole rooms have to be gutted. While replacing a window in the kitchen, an entire wall collapses, leaving them vulnerable to their dangerous neighborhood.

Matloff struggles with buyer’s remorse, but as the house gets better, so does the neighborhood — with just as much effort. The city’s cleanup is led by New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, and even that comes with its own problems.

In short, Home Girl is the story of turning a house — and its surrounding community — into a home. — Mary Cashiola

Up for Renewal: What Magazines Taught Me About Love, Sex, and Starting Over

By Cathy Alter

Atria Books, 320 pp., $24

In her late 30s, Cathy Alter was divorced, bored by her job, drinking and smoking way too much, having a disastrous office affair, and one of her dearest friends told her, “I don’t think I can be around you any longer.” Alter’s response? “I can’t be around me.”

So, Alter drew up a list of things she wanted different about her life, and something about that list struck her as familiar: Each point sounded like the tagline from a woman’s magazine. And while she acknowledges in her introduction to Up for Renewal to finding her task a bit silly, if not anti-feminist, she bought those magazines with a vow that she would devote one month each to improving one aspect of herself — career, home, body, relationships, etc. — for the following year.

And she did. Sort of. And more. The exercise tips she abandoned in favor of a personal trainer. The recipes she followed came with successes and a major flop. Spicing up her sex life with gee-gaws didn’t fly, but the laughter it created brought her and her lover closer. By the end of the year, Alter was content and married. Where some might see these articles in these same magazines as propagating self-loathing, Alter saw them as possibility, a vehicle of change.

The book is intensely personal. Alter reveals herself, warts and all. But no matter how witty Alter can be (and she’s witty in spades), the book reeks of a clever pitch to a publisher. Perhaps if she had followed the magazine advice to the letter, she would have come up with true comedy and maybe some pathos. Instead, it’s a bit weird for readers to be so privy to Alter’s not-so-unordinary life.

Up for Renewal? Save your 24 bucks and buy some magazines. — Susan Ellis

Essential Cinema: On the Necessity of Film Canons

By Jonathan Rosenbaum

Johns Hopkins University Press, 449 pp., $25 (paperback)

In some ways, Jonathan Rosenbaum — longtime film critic for the alternative newsweekly the Chicago Reader who retired from that position earlier this year — is to American film discussion what Ralph Nader or Noam Chomsky are to American political discourse: He’s a major voice committed to combating the nexus of studio marketing, corporate-media publicity, box-office receipts, Oscar telecasts, and the American Film Institute lists, which, Rosenbaum argues, both drive and limit the discussion of cinema in this country.

That said, Essential Cinema — an updated edition of a book that first appeared in 2004 — doesn’t exactly do what its title claims. Other than an introduction that lays out Rosenbaum’s philosophy about film canons and a personal canon (expanded and further annotated from the previous edition) of more than 1,000 (!) films at the back of the book, Essential Cinema is just a collection of previously published reviews.

Rosenbaum dealt with the topic of the title better in his previous book, Movie Wars, which effectively and appropriately excoriated the AFI’s list of the greatest American movies. Movie Wars was a polemic that might brand Rosenbaum a crank or angry prophet, depending on your perspective. Essential Cinema, by contrast, is a chance to enjoy a bunch of reviews from one of the best long-form film critics on the planet, including brilliantly detailed explications of films such as M, Rear Window, and Eyes Wide Shut.

But caveat emptor: Rosenbaum is the rare American film critic who approaches the medium from a global perspective. Only about a third of the material in Essential Cinema covers American films. — Chris Herrington

Cuisines of the Axis of Evil and Other Irritating States

By Chris Fair

The Lyons Press, 336 pp., $24.95

It’s not every day that you stumble upon a food writer as daring as Chris Fair, whose Cuisines of the Axis of Evil and Other Irritating States easily commingles brutal stories about bloody war, bloody murder, and bloody revenge in the bloody desert with an explosive collection of fabulous recipes that will make your house smell better than a virgin-stocked kitchen in heaven’s high-rent district. Dedicated to those who hunger for peace, justice, and security and aptly subtitled “A Dinner Party Approach to International Relations,” Fair introduces his readers to culinary concepts like a Palestinian upside-down meat and vegetable casserole and a chicken, walnut, and pomegranate stew from those baddies in Iran.

Critics may compare Fair to Lord Chamberlain and say that his cardamom-spiced Arabic coffee is nothing but culinary appeasement. But one mustn’t be too swift to judge and neglect an all-American chapter devoted to roasted sweet potatoes in sage butter and apple pear crumble.

There are some unsavory regimes out there, but diplomacy doesn’t have to be completely unpalatable. — Chris Davis

How Does Your Garden Grow?

In this world of shopping-center parking lots and factories, the landscape is starting to look a little, um, gray. But urban areas don’t have to be all asphalt and brick facades.

Enter guerrilla gardening. Much like the warfare of the same name, this new form of urban gardening utilizes mobile and covert tactics. For example, a green-thumbed guy may plant a few zinnias in an abandoned streetside planter under cover of night. Or a flower-loving girl might toss wildflower seeds from her car window as she passes a patch of grass in an industrial area.

Richard Reynolds’ On Guerrilla Gardening (Bloomsbury, $25.99) serves as a colorful guide for prospective urban landscape artists — with everything from a history of the guerilla-gardening movement, to the “arsenal” (a plant guide), to how to deal with garden pests and litter.

Bianca Phillips

White like me

Let’s face it. White people have a nasty history of oppressing other races. And there’s so many of us that we can’t identify with any one “white” culture.

Or can we? Christian Lander’s tongue-in-cheek The Definitive Guide to Stuff White People Like (Random House, $14), based on Lander’s popular blog (StuffWhitePeopleLike.com), features 150 people, places, and things that define whiteness, like David Sedaris (#25), ’80s nights (#29), and Whole Foods (#48).

Lander’s book should actually be titled The Definitive Guide to Stuff White Middle-Class Liberal American (and Maybe Some Canadian) People Like. Though I’m a tried-and true whitey by Lander’s standard (i.e., I dream of owning a Prius, love recycling, and think music piracy is just my way of sticking it to the man), I’m also a tried-and-true left-of-left-of-center liberal.

I know a few white conservatives, though, who would count as black if they took Lander’s “How White Are You?” quiz. For example, I doubt you’ll find any blue-collar Republicans sporting Che Guevara’s (#113) mug on a vintage-style, organic cotton T-shirt (#84).

But Lander’s book is a must-read for any Barack Obama-supporting (#8), sushi-loving (#42), Apple computer-promoting (#40) liberal. Your level of whiteness may surprise you and make you laugh in spite of your white self. — Bianca Phillips

Categories
Cover Feature News

Showdown in the 9th District

Derek Haire, a young political activist and sometime blogger, had by late June seen his long-standing devotion to Steve Cohen rewarded with a paid position in the 9th District congressman’s reelection campaign. As Haire knew, the grunt work in most campaigns is done free, by volunteers whose devotion serves as both motivation and reward. So he was blissful at the opportunity to be a bona fide staffer, though he was cautioned that his hours would be long and his pay would be minimal. “Steve Cohen isn’t Santa Claus” was the stock phrase, though the congressman’s pay scale was level with the norm, maybe higher.

Haire was put in charge of a detail canvassing neighborhoods in the district and asking residents for permission to place Cohen campaign signs in their yards. One afternoon, he drove a borrowed truck up a bleak Orange Mound street, dutifully checking for ideal locations. He had just parked when he noticed a cluster of male teens, all sporting cornrows and gangsta threads, approaching his vehicle from both sides. Even as Haire was calculating what to do, they were upon him, looking into his side windows, at the anti-youth-violence slogans painted on the truck, and finally at the blue-and-gold campaign signs in the bed of the pickup. Haire made bold to lower the window on the driver’s side.

“What are you doing here?” asked one of the youths, his face an impassive mask.

Deliberating only a second — during which his main thought was that there he was, a slightly built white kid by himself in unfamiliar terrain, surrounded by some dour-looking dudes ­— Haire said, “I’m giving away Cohen campaign signs. You want one?”

The youth who had spoken leaned into Haire’s car and craned his head around, peering again at the stacks of signs in the back.

“Yeah!” he said finally, with the beginnings of a smile. From behind him came another voice: “Yeah, I want one, too.” And another: “Hey, could I have one?”

Justin Fox Burks

Before it was over, Haire and the youths had formed a posse of sorts, working the block up and down, pushing the wire ends of the campaign signs into yard after yard, turning at least that modest section of Orange Mound into what appeared to be an outpost of apparent enthusiasm for the incumbent.

Haire’s experience was counterpointed at the week’s end, when a Cohen supporter hosted a meet-and greet for the candidate in Uptown Square, a newish downtown development redeemed from what had been the Hurt Village housing project. Uptown Square is an experiment in mixed-residency living, a far cry from the ghetto that Hurt Village had become before it was razed away into history.

Consistent with the venue, the people on hand were something of a diverse mix. During the question-and-answer session that followed Cohen’s brief remarks, one man, a young Republican, asked about a celebrated incident at the opening of the 2006 state legislative session, destined to be Cohen’s last, when the then state senator, with the full knowledge that he would likely be a candidate for Congress that year, made a point of challenging on church-vs.-state grounds the overtly Christian sentiments of a Baptist pastor’s invocation.

Impolitic as that seemed to virtually everybody at the time, it was yet another instance of Cohen being Cohen, of a public figure who, for better or for worse, tends to let whatever is bubbling (or seething) in his subconscious find its way to the surface.

(A more recent example was his quip, delivered both to a local reporter and to assembled Democrats at this year’s annual Kennedy Day Dinner, comparing Hillary Clinton, then still vying for the presidency, with the fanatically determined character played by Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction; the remark drew national attention and may have been a factor in the decision by Emily’s List, the feminist pro-choice PAC, to endorse opponent Nikki Tinker.)

Cohen’s reply to the questioner at Uptown Square, however, was measured. Yes, he said, he remained a firm defender of the principle of separating church and state. But he had come to realize, during his year and a half of congressional service, that his African-American constituents had a different conception of the relationship between church and state, one that he respected.

That difference would be in play two days later, when Cohen, like any realistic candidate running for office in inner-city Memphis, made an obligatory round of Sunday church stops.

One of those was at New Olivet Baptist Church, whose minister is the irrepressible Kenneth Whalum Jr., a maverick school board member and, some say, aspirant mayor. Whalum’s religious style is equal parts Old Gospel and New Wave and involves extended spells of congregational dancing and singing, led by the energetic pastor himself.

by Justin Fox Burks

Left to right: Joe Towns, Nikki Tinker, and Steve Cohen

“Come on, Congressman Cohen!” Whalum exhorted from the pulpit, as he spotted Cohen, accompanied by his local office director and all-purpose factotum Randy Wade, threading down the center aisle amid the gyrating and syncopation of Olivet’s worshippers. The congressman, famously hip in private, was no doubt restrained from too much direct participation both by the protocol of his office and by the fact of a bad leg damaged by childhood polio.

But he was front and center soon enough, when Whalum called a pause and asked Cohen to rise. He did, to cheers from the congregation, and was beckoned into the center aisle again by a congregant who made a point of bestowing on him a prolonged and ostentatious hug. More cheers. “You can’t get away from her,” Whalum observed in delighted amusement and finally said, in a mock-protective tone, “Ushers, sit this boy down. Sit this boy down!”

The fun over, Whalum shifted into serious mode and thanked Cohen for “being so gracious when our young people visited Washington” and for other favors. Another extended song break later, Whalum announced that the congressman needed to leave in order to visit other churches and upped his volume a bit to proclaim, “We love Steve!” Again, the cheers, as Cohen made his exit via a side door.

Outside the church, on his way to the next venue, Cohen was properly appreciative, even somewhat awed. “This is the best I’ve ever been received,” he said. “This is home for me.”

The reality, of course, is that the first-term incumbent has serious competition for the affection of Memphis’ black churchgoers, an important segment of a district whose voting constituency is 60 percent black. It comes from Nikki Tinker, an African-American lawyer with a killer smile and a resume that includes both up-from-nothing beginnings in home state Alabama and a prestigious job as a local attorney for Pinnacle Airlines.

It also includes past service as a campaign manager for former congressman Harold Ford Jr., though both the duration of her time on the job (on the stump she claims it lasted five years) and the demands of it (Ford was never seriously contested during her tenure) have been privately disputed by other Ford staffers. It is also unclear to what extent remnants of the once-mighty Ford organization are supporting Tinker, if at all — though Shelby County commissioner Sidney Chism, another political broker of note, is definitely with her, as are such name politicians as state House of Representatives pro tem Lois DeBerry, city clerk Thomas Long, state representative Ulysses Jones, and former county commissioner Walter Bailey.

That, however, comes close to completing the list of influential Tinker supporters. What is also interesting is who is not supporting Tinker — including virtually all of the African-American candidates who, along with Tinker and Cohen, composed the 15-member congressional field in 2006, when Harold Ford Jr. vacated the 9th District seat to run for the U.S. Senate. That would include those for whom race was never an issue and at least two — former county commissioner Julian Bolton and consultant Ron Redwing — who two years ago proclaimed that the district should be represented by a black but who publicly support Cohen this time around.

Tinker’s decision to run again this year is probably influenced more by simple mathematics than anything else. Having finished only a few thousand votes back of Cohen in a field of 15, most of whom (including Cohen himself) competed with her for the district’s black vote, why should she not, two years later, try to go one-on-one?

She has been designated as a “consensus” black candidate this time around by several holdouts for the idea that a black, and only a black, should represent the 9th District in Congress. Perhaps foremost among those is the Rev. LaSimba Gray, who led a failed effort to settle on such a candidate two years ago but whose choice this time around was almost a matter of default.

Besides two candidates considered fringe, only state representative Joe Towns, an African-American candidate who has, however, disavowed the race label and who, in any case, filed to run after Tinker’s selection, was available.

Gray was instrumental in arousing opposition to Cohen among members of the Memphis Baptist Ministerial Association — ostensibly in opposition to the congressman’s vote in 2007 for federal hate crimes legislation (which Gray and others branded as gay-friendly). But a few outspoken members of the association made it clear that Cohen’s real offense was his race or his religion. A black pastor in Middle Tennessee launched a supportive attack against Cohen under the slogan “Steve Cohen and the Jews Hate Jesus.”

In any case, Tinker, like Cohen, was a visible presence in predominantly black churches this past Sunday, and she had with her such luminaries as DeBerry, Long, and — pièce de resistance — Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs-Jones of Cleveland, Ohio, an ebullient politician who supported Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid to the end and who has so far been the only member of the Congressional Black Caucus to step forward on Tinker’s behalf.

Justin Fox Burks

Steve Cohen works the crowd at the WREG debate.

After being introduced by DeBerry in the pulpit of Monumental Baptist Church on Sunday, Tubbs-Jones delivered an enthusiastic endorsement of Tinker as “a young woman who is talented, who is skilled, and who deserves to represent the city of Memphis in Congress.” After scolding the media for allegedly making too much of Tinker’s being a black woman, Tubbs-Jones repeated, “Nikki Tinker is talented and qualified, and, praise God, she’s a gorgeous black woman.”

Appearing in the pulpit on her own behalf, with two small children in tow, Tinker said, “This is not about my race, it’s not about my religion. I’m concerned about where these young people are going to be 20 years from now.” Reprising the elements of a TV commercial she ran in 2006 and which has been recycled this week, she said, “You all know my story. You know I was raised by a strong-working, hard-working single mama and a disabled grandmother, who lost her eyesight to diabetes. And when I’m traveling through Memphis, up and down South Parkway and Whitehaven and Boxtown and Westwood and New Chicago, I see people like my grandmother, who are afraid to get to the mailbox, still looking for help and support … .”

Tinker continued, “I will go through the fire if I have to. … And I want to tell you, I will deal with this media. I say I will fight ’em and do everything I have to do. I’m looking for some prayer warriors, though.”

And, as she and her party were departing the sanctuary on their way to other churches, Monumental’s pastor, the celebrated Rev. Billy Kyles, reminded his congregation of his involvement in prior 9th District races, beginning in 1974, when Harold Ford Sr. became the first elected black congressman in Tennessee, and continuing through the decade of Harold Ford Jr.’s tenure in office.

“We’ve been trying to get that seat back,” Kyles said. “It is our seat.”

Whatever the stand of individual pastors, though, there was clearly no consensus in the black community concerning the congressional race. In the minutes before Tinker’s arrival at Monumental, there had been some interesting byplay in the lobby between two church greeters — Rodney Whitmore, a deacon, and Johnny Raney, an usher.

“That Steve Cohen has done a pretty good job in Congress,” Whitmore said. “I think I’m going to vote for him.”

“He might have done a good job,” Raney responded. “But I’m not going to vote for him.”

It went on from there and concluded with the two church officials engaging in some mock shadow-boxing, but the brief dialogue capsulized the conflict of priorities that was one of the central dramas of the 2008 congressional race, as well as the single greatest unknown quantity.

Every old saw has an ideal application, and Sunday night’s televised debate involving three 9th District congressional candidates perfectly invoked that sardonic chestnut which goes, “All have won, and all must have prizes.”

When the sometimes stormy hour-long affair at the studios of WREG-TV had run its course, backers of incumbent first-term Democrat Cohen ended up being reassured of his unmatchable experience and prowess. Those supporting Cohen’s chief primary challenger, Tinker, were likewise convinced of their candidate’s common touch and oneness with the people. And Towns’ claque (such as there was before Sunday night) were pleased with their man’s singular common sense and panache, as well as his full-out assault on unidentified “special interests.”

Conversely, detractors of Cohen might have seen him as somewhat smug and supercilious; Tinker’s opponents might feel justified in seeing her as shallow and opportunistic; and those prepared to discount Towns could have likened him — as did Richard Thompson of the Mediaverse blog — to another notorious spare political wheel, John Willingham.

The actual impact on whatever portion of the electorate watching the debate was probably a composite of all these points of view. And, while Cohen might have ended up ahead in forensic terms, the equalizing effect of the joint appearance and the free-media aspect of the forum had to be a boost for both his rivals.

Questioning the contenders were Norm Brewer, Otis Sanford, and Linda Moore — Brewer a regular commentator for the station and the latter two the managing editor and a staff writer, respectively, for The Commercial Appeal, a debate co-sponsor, along with the Urban League, the activist group Mpact Memphis, and WREG.

All three panelists posed reasonable and relevant questions, as did the two audience members who were permitted to interrogate the candidates, though the issues raised (or the answers given) tended to be of the general, all-along-the-waterfront variety. All three candidates viewed rising gas prices and the home-mortgage crisis with alarm, and all wanted to see improved economic horizons. Each claimed to have a better slant on these matters than the other two, but Cohen could — and did — note early on that neither Tinker nor Towns had found fault with his congressional record to date. “I appreciate the endorsement of Miss Tinker and Representative Towns for my votes,” he said laconically.

The first real friction was generated by a question from Moore, who touched upon what she called “the elephant in the room” — namely, the importance of racial and religious factors in the race.

This brought an unexpected protestation from Tinker that she was “not anti-Semitic” and regarded it as “an insult to me” that she had been so accused. That such an allegation had been made was news to most of those attending, though one of her chief backers, Sidney Chism, had made the point last week, addressing the Baptist Ministerial Association on her behalf, that Jews were likely to vote for co-religionist Cohen.

And well they might, on the general principle that voters tend to gravitate toward candidates of like backgrounds. There has been no suggestion from the Jewish community, however, that a Jew should represent the 9th District, while Tinker and many of her supporters openly assert that the majority-black urban district should be represented by a black congressman. As Tinker put it Sunday night, noting the demographic facts of life in Tennessee’s nine congressional districts, “This is the only one where African Americans can stand up and run,” she said. “Can we just have one?”

If Tinker expected agreement from Towns, she didn’t get it. “If you’re black and no good, you’re no good. If you’re white and no good, you’re no good,” he said, in pithy dismissal of the issue. That did not stay him, later on, from chastising Cohen for the then state senator’s anguished reaction to a lower-than-hoped-for black vote in 1996, after losing his first congressional race to Harold Ford Jr. that year.

Cohen’s response was that his frustration had mainly stemmed from the vote garnered against him that year by the late Tommie Edwards, a relatively uncredentialed opponent in Cohen’s simultaneous reelection race for the state senate. The congressman noted that he went on to win the black vote in the 2006 general election. As for 2008, Cohen, a sometime speaking surrogate for presidential candidate Barack Obama, cited voter acceptance of racial differences in his own case, that of Obama, and that of Shelby County mayor A C Wharton, an African American.

“We’ve turned a corner,” Cohen maintained. “Barack Obama, A C Wharton, and Steve Cohen are in the same boat, and it’s a boat that’s moving forward.”

Towns made an effort to rock Tinker’s boat as well, castigating as “demeaning” her frequent declarations in a TV commercial that she’s running in part to make sure that her infirm grandmother’s government check continues to get to her porch.

Tinker’s pitch Sunday night was heavy in such personally tinged declarations, which constituted a counterpoint of sorts to Cohen’s frequent citation of his endorsements (the NAACP, the AFL-CIO, the Sierra Club, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Judiciary chairman John Conyers, among others) and the financial benefits to the district and other accomplishments from his legislative record, both in Congress and previously, during his several decades as state senator. In a sideswipe clearly directed at the incumbent’s ubiquitous presence in the district, she said, “People are tired and fed up. At the same time we’ve got elected officials just running around here and going to galas and, you know, giving out proclamations and renaming buildings.”

Debate moderators Richard Ransom and Claudia Barr had their hands full keeping accurate tabs on time allotted to the principals, especially during a segment allowing candidates to accuse and challenge each other. Tinker availed herself of such a moment to ask Cohen, who holds an investment portfolio, if it was true that he “profited” from an increase in gasoline prices.

The congressman rebutted the notion, contending, “I always vote against my own personal financial interests.” He then turned the question around on Tinker, inquiring about the stock holdings in her pension or 401(k) accounts at Pinnacle Airlines. Cohen also pressed Tinker on her self-definition as a “civil rights attorney,” extracting her grudging concession that she had served Pinnacle for the last decade on the management side of labor-relations issues.

But Cohen’s relentless prosecution of that line of questioning also yielded Tinker what may have been an effective moment in self-defense.

When the congressman interrupted Tinker at one point, insisting on a direct answer to a question, she responded, “Mr. Cohen, I’ve respected you, and I’ve allowed you to [finish your answers]. … I’m asking for your respect, as humbly as I know how.” Apropos his allegations about the nature of her employment, she contended that her airline’s flight attendants and baggage handlers are “on the front lines with me and supporting me in this campaign.” She concluded, “My heart is pure, and I’m satisfied with what I’ve done.”

It remains to be seen to what degree viewers were satisfied with what the candidates, together or singly, had done in a debate that, as Towns suggested, was meant to “allow … us to see who is who and what is not.”

One issue that remained unexamined was that of abortion, on which Cohen has long been known as pro-choice, while Towns has just as resolutely proclaimed his pro-life views. Tinker’s position has been shrouded in mystery, though, as indicated, she received an endorsement — and presumably the promise of funding — from pro-choice group Emily’s List.

CA columnist Wendi Thomas, originally scheduled to be a panelist for the debate, wrote a column speculating on Tinker’s abortion-issue dilemma, since many of her supporters are virulently anti-abortion. One result of that was apparently a negative reaction from the Tinker camp, who saw Thomas’ column as over-critical and, according to debate organizers, requested that Thomas be replaced as a panelist.

One result: Moore was there in Thomas’ stead. Another result, inadvertently or not: No question about abortion was ever asked.

Less than a month remains before the 9th District’s Democratic voters resolve the issue on August 7th. Early voting begins Friday and continues through Saturday, August 2nd. Cohen held a substantial fund-raising lead over Tinker through the first quarter of 2008, with second-quarter totals due to be known within the week. (See Politics, p. 13, for more information on early-voting locations and financial disclosures.)

As of now, no further public debates are scheduled — a fact unhelpful to Towns, who has raised virtually no money and who probably needs more free media like Sunday night’s to gain real traction. Meanwhile, warriors Cohen and Tinker had ample money to spend and were running their first round of TV commercials virtually nonstop — Cohen touting the record of his first term in Congress and Tinker making her porch-top plea.

Further pyrotechnics may be in store before the summer’s fireworks season is done, and the Flyer will bring you news of them. A last comprehensive look at the 9th District race will be included in our pre-election issue of July 31st.

Categories
Cover Feature News

Printing Money:

“Don’t pay any attention to what they write about you.

Just measure it in inches.” Andy Warhol

David McCarthy stands in the downstairs gallery at the Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, nodding sympathetically at a wall full of oddly colored camouflage prints like a police psychic attempting to mentally bond with an object once touched by a murder victim.

“It’s hysterical,” he concludes, snickering a bit. While others might look at the wall and see only a bunch of crazy colored camo, McCarthy, an art history professor at Rhodes College, husband of Marina Pacini, the Brooks’ chief curator, and the author of Pop Art, a concise, generously illustrated tour through the Warhol era, sees another perfect example of the catty artist’s deadpan wit.

“This was also a way for Warhol to approach abstract expressionism,” McCarthy adds, which is a polite way of suggesting that Warhol’s outlandishly imagined camo samples aren’t merely outlandishly colored camo samples. They are also a shout-out to 1980s hip-hop culture and a dig at the self-absorbed romanticism of mid-century art stars such as Willem de Kooning and Jackson Pollock, neither of whom would greatly appreciate having their work compared to commercial hunting gear.

Warhol’s name has become synonymous with pop art, a visual art movement born in the 1950s and characterized by the appropriation of images and themes from comic books, print advertising, and other aspects of popular culture that would have previously been considered unfit subjects for a fine artist. According to McCarthy, this appropriation of vulgar imagery resulted in part because painters like Pollock and de Kooning so completely dominated their field many artists felt that abstraction was blocked to them.

“The whole point of camouflage is to blend in with your surroundings, right?” asks an amused McCarthy, who is teaming up with his wife to bring a little context to “The Prints of Andy Warhol (From A to B and Back Again),” a bright and bracing exhibition featuring 63 prints and five paintings on display at the Brooks through September 7th.

“There’s absolutely nothing about this camouflage that blends in,” he says.

“I never think that people die. They just go to department stores.”

— Andy Warhol

It’s been 20 years since Warhol, the bigwig of American pop, blew up his last silver balloon and floated off to shop with Elvis and Marilyn Monroe at the big department store in the sky. But even now, only a month away from what would have been the artist’s 80th birthday, it’s difficult to look at his cartoonish renderings of soup cans and movie stars without asking many of the same old questions: Was he America’s great visionary artist or simply one of its most colorful capitalists? Was he a prankster or a traditionalist struggling to civilize rude new materials and vulgar subject matter in the shadow of abstract expressionism? Or was he P.T. Barnum with a paint brush?

Flower, 1964, Founding Collection, The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh

“The great thing about Warhol is that you never really know for sure,” Pacini says, standing next to her husband beneath one of Warhol’s aggressively red Elizabeth Taylor prints. But McCarthy offers yet another choice.

“Why can’t he be all of those things?” he asks, adding that it’s always difficult to turn to Warhol’s own commentary for answers.

“Whenever anybody asked Warhol, ‘Hey, where’s the meat?’ he always answered, ‘If you really want to know who I am, it’s all right there on the surface of the artwork.'”

Warhol wasn’t the first artist to sample images from Americana and consumer culture, yet his work is singularly iconic within the international pop art movement. McCarthy and Pacini agree that Warhol’s savvy pursuit of notoriety, combined with his uniquely American attitudes regarding art and commerce, is what set him apart from pop art peers like Roy Lichtenstein, James Rosenquist, and Tom Wesselmann, who all have work on display in “Pop Environment,” another exhibition currently on display at the Brooks.

“Instead of making just one painting, Warhol made prints,” McCarthy says. “That increased his market share. Then he diversified his portfolio by branching out and making films and promoting rock-and-roll music — and it didn’t hurt that the band he promoted was the Velvet Underground. He promoted the Warhol brand endlessly and hired a publicist in the 1960s so that his name would be in the media somewhere every week. And not just in stories about art. He might be on the society page, because he’s been at some party with a lot of celebrities. Suddenly Andy Warhol was the big name.”

$ (9), 1982, Founding Collection, The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh

By contrast, acclaimed artists like Robert Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns both picked up commercial work designing department store windows but didn’t like talking about it. Warhol was never ashamed of his commercial work. From his earliest days as an illustrator in the mid-1950s, he was front and center as both a creative force and as a brand name. According to McCarthy, this is the thing that still rubs some people the wrong way.

“As a culture, we somehow want our art to exist outside of economics,” McCarthy says, setting up the artist’s paradox. “At the same time, we’re hard-wired because of our culture to immediately wonder what a piece of art is worth. So if we read in the paper that a painting by Francis Bacon just sold for $24.7 million, nobody cares what Bacon was about, because we now know a Bacon is worth $24.7 million.”

Camouflage, 1987, Founding Collection, The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh

In addition to having a diversified portfolio and exceptional marketing instincts, Warhol knew how to build networks that reached to the heart of various cultural movements. Looking at one of Warhol’s famous flower prints — an appropriation of a Patricia Caulfield photograph from a 1964 issue of Modern Photography magazine — McCarthy remarks that it may be a kind of homage to New York’s Peace Eye Bookstore and other participants in the 1960s peace movement who were connected to Warhol by way of a vulgar anti-folk band called the Fugs.

Warhol, who left an estate variously valued between $100 million and $800 million, also extended his business analogy through his “factory,” McCarthy explains, referring to the storied 47th Street art studio Warhol kept from 1964 to 1968. “Only this factory would be powered by stars,” he adds. “The stars whose images he used, like Marilyn Monroe and Elizabeth Taylor, and also the ‘stars’ in his movies.”

Electric Chair, ca. 1978, Founding Collection, The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh

“There’s a flip that happens,” Pacini says, referencing the big red print of Liz Taylor. “There’s a period where Andy is painting famous people. Then suddenly he’s as famous or more famous than the people who want him to do their portraits.

“There’s this great Warhol quote,” Pacini says, turning her attention to a smallish pink and red dollar-sign painting and paraphrasing Warhol: “‘People buy a $250,000 piece of art so they can hang it on the wall where other people will see it and know they have $250,000 to spend on a painting.’ Then Warhol asked, ‘Why don’t they just hang the $250,000 on the wall where people can see it?'”

“Being born is like being kidnapped and then sold into slavery. People are working every minute. The machinery is always going. Even when you sleep.” — Andy Warhol

Seeing a large sample of Warhol’s work can be confusing, because it’s so tempting to write him off as the superficial character he played. And then you stumble across one of his electric-chair prints or an ambulance disaster from his “Death and Disaster” series. You realize that in spite of his reputation, Warhol was actively engaging in many of the great cultural debates of the middle 20th century.

Campbells Soup I: Beef, 1968, Founding Collection, The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh

In one of his more candid interviews from the early 1970s, Warhol even admitted to harboring political yearnings. When asked if he’d be a better president than Richard Nixon, the spacy wit known for answering reporters with comic non sequiturs became unusually animated and engaged.

“I sure would,” Warhol boasted. “The first thing I’d do is put carpet in the streets,” he said. “And money for everybody.”

Money for everybody. How radically populist. Suddenly his best-known artistic pronouncements all sounded like twisted campaign promises: Fifteen minutes of fame for everyone; Campbell’s soup and Coke for everyone.

“What’s great about this country is that America started the tradition where the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest,” Warhol once said.

“You can be watching TV and see Coca-Cola, and you know that the president drinks Coke, Liz Taylor drinks Coke, and just think, you can drink Coke, too. A Coke is a Coke and no amount of money can get you a better Coke than the one the bum on the corner is drinking. All the Cokes are the same and all the Cokes are good. Liz Taylor knows it, the president knows it, the bum knows it, and you know it.”

“Maybe that’s his end-run around socialism,” McCarthy suggests, strolling past prints of Reagan, Mao, Lenin, and a bottle of Chanel No. 5. “He turns socialism into capitalism. Maybe it’s his way of saying that capitalism can transform any sort of resistance into money. And into a lifestyle.

“His really is the great Horatio Alger story,” McCarthy concludes, reminding us that Warhol, who grew up in Pittsburgh as the son of Eastern European immigrants, was a first-generation American and the son of a coal miner.

“He started with basically nothing,” McCarthy says, “and he completely redrew the map for what it means to be an American artist.”