Categories
Sports Sports Feature

NBA Chaos Theory

“This is why we can’t have nice things.” That’s the first thought I had when I read Marc Stein of ESPN’s tweet dropping the bomb no one (save for maybe Chris Wallace) saw coming: Jason Levien and Stu Lash were on their way out of the Grizzlies organization. The Grizzlies had just finished up a tumultuous season: 50 games won despite injuries; a first-year head coach; long stretches of uninspired, lackluster play; and a barrage of Zach Randolph trade rumors.

Throughout the season, we learned a few things: Dave Joerger, despite his flaws and growing pains, is undeniably a decent coach. (Before you write those angry Lionel Hollins letters, please note that I said “decent.”) Levien, Lash, and John Hollinger proved they could make smart basketball decisions that also took the franchise’s long-term financial health into consideration. On the business side, the team has never been in better shape. ESPN ranked the Grizzlies the #1 Franchise in Professional Sports for a reason.

All of that isn’t necessarily gone, but it’s certainly been jeopardized. Controlling owner Robert Pera has shown some of the smartest guys in the business the door, allowed Joerger to interview for the Minnesota Timberwolves’ coaching job, and has said absolutely nothing about what he’s thinking or where the team is going. Not that he has to, of course. The fact remains, though, that the only people talking about what’s going on are people who were just shown the door, and thus 1) don’t know what’s happening with the team any longer and 2) are, shall we say, motivated to paint what has already happened as the lashings out of a crazy person.

Not that we know whether Pera is a crazy person or not. It’s entirely possible that he is, but it’s entirely possible that he has a carefully thought-out master plan that will take the Grizzlies from good to great. We’ll just have to wait and see.

The onus is now on Pera to regain the trust of the fan base and prove that he knows what he’s doing. Trust takes time to build and no time at all to destroy. There’s every reason in the world to think the Grizzlies are transforming into the Knicks right before our eyes: an owner who wants to call shots he shouldn’t be calling and who lacks the self-awareness to know when to stand back and let the basketball people do their jobs. That works in New York, where the Knicks have a license to print money. That goes a long way to cover up inept management. It doesn’t work in a small market, where the team has to break even to be viable, and a big part of breaking even is careful management, both of the business side and the basketball side. The Grizzlies’ fan base is still young and relatively fragile. A detour back to the broken-foot-Pau days may not permanently damage that relationship between team and city, but it won’t help.

There are on-court things to consider, too. How does this affect Zach Randolph’s decision-making regarding his player option this summer? If Pera makes the wrong moves, will Marc Gasol want to stay around next summer? If the wrong head coach is brought in, will that coach be able to manage the personalities in this locker room? It’s not hard to imagine a scenario where the good things the Griz have built over the past five years are washed away by a bad hire or two.

It could work out, of course. But at the very least, the power structure of the Grizzlies’ unwieldy ownership group has been upended, and relationships there may be damaged beyond repair. A promising front office has been partially dismantled, and a promising young coach has been shown the door, possibly because a player or two didn’t like him (but then, we don’t really know what the players said in those secret season-ending interviews with Pera). At the very least, instability has been injected into a situation where it didn’t seem like there was any, and Pera has taken his basketball team from a smart situation set up for success to, well, who knows?

It was already going to be an important summer for the Grizzlies, but it was only supposed to be roster decisions that determined the future direction of the team. Now there is no direction visible, and all of us get to sit and watch and wait for the Grizzlies to be remade in some image. But whose will it be, and how will it shake out? That’s up to Robert Pera, for better or for worse.

Categories
Beyond the Arc Sports

Grizzlies Fire Levien, Lash

In news that seemed to come out of nowhere, the Grizzlies announced Monday afternoon that the team was parting ways with CEO Jason Levian and basketball operations director Stu Lash.

The press release issued by team owner Robert Pera was terse and light on details:

The Memphis Grizzlies announced today that following discussions with management, the decision was made for Jason Levien and Stu Lash to depart the organization.

“Our franchise has made tremendous strides over the last few seasons and we thank Jason for his hard work and dedication and wish him nothing but success in his future endeavors,” said Grizzlies Controlling Owner Robert Pera. “Rest assured that we remain as committed as ever to bringing a championship to this great city and we are confident that when the new season begins our fans will be excited about both our roster and the direction of our organization.”

Going forward, existing Grizzlies General Manager Chris Wallace will assume interim responsibility for the franchise’s basketball operations and Chief Operating Officer Jason Wexler will remain responsible for the franchise’s business operations.

The Flyer‘s Kevin Lipe will have more on the situation as it develops.

Categories
Cover Feature News

Hoop City 2013: 20 Questions – pt. 1

The Grizzlies had the most successful season in the short, mostly futile history of the franchise last season with their run to the Western Conference Finals. There was a sense last May that anything was possible: The team could bring an NBA championship to Memphis, or they could get swept by the San Antonio Spurs (which is what actually happened, since the Spurs were on their own star-crossed run to a seven-game finals with the eventual champion, Miami Heat). Either way, it was Memphis’ time to shine. The Grizzlies, in what felt like a culmination of something that started in the 2011 first-round victory over San Antonio, put the whole city on their backs and tried to take us to the promised land. It was a magical couple of weeks, even if it didn’t end up going according to plan.

Since then, a few things have changed with the Grizzlies: Lionel Hollins — whose contract was up at the end of last season — wasn’t brought back, and assistant coach Dave Joerger — who won multiple championships in the NBA D-League and the CBA — was promoted to the head spot. The bench was completely overhauled, bringing in several new faces to play alongside some of the familiar ones — players like Kosta Koufos, Nick Calathes, and incoming rookie Jamaal Franklin. The offense is being retooled around the tandem of Mike Conley and reigning Defensive Player of the Year Marc Gasol. Things are different, and there are a lot of unanswered questions facing the Grizzlies as they head into the 2013-14 regular season, questions we probably won’t know the answers to until the season is well under way. Here are 10 of them, along with a brief discussion of “what we know so far” with each.

1: Was hiring Dave Joerger instead of bringing back Lionel Hollins the right move?

The question of whether Dave Joerger is the right head coach for the Grizzlies and the question of whether Lionel Hollins should have been brought back on a new contract are really two distinct issues. As to Hollins, I’ll just say this: The Grizzlies’ new ownership and new front office didn’t hire him, and they didn’t think he was the right kind of coach to implement the philosophy with which they want to run the organization. Whether or not he was winning basketball games, he simply didn’t have the approach that the front office wanted in their head coach, and thus his fate was sealed.

Joerger is more of a question mark, but, to my mind, not much of one: He’s got clear winning credentials at the minor-league level, and he’s been with the Grizzlies since 2007 as an assistant. He’s a guy who excelled at player development in the minor leagues, and that capability goes hand-in-hand with the way the new Grizzlies leadership wants to run the team. We heard it from owner Robert Pera himself on Media Day: The Grizzlies want to emulate the Spurs’ model of creating a perennial contender through player development and smart roster moves. Joerger’s coaching credentials and his approach to developing raw young guys make him an important part of that equation.

2: Will Zach Randolph be in Memphis at the end of the season?

Randolph, 32, has been a defining figure in the emergence of the Grizzlies on the NBA scene as a legitimate force to be reckoned with, but he’s got a player option in his contract for $16.5 million next year that could potentially cripple the team’s ability to make other roster moves, especially since Gasol, Conley, and Tony Allen will combine for almost $30 million next year. Randolph’s game has started to change as he ages. He’s getting his shots blocked more and having to work harder for every basket. It hasn’t been all bad, as he led the league in offensive rebounds last season, but how many of those rebounds were off his own missed shots? As his game starts to decline, which it will inevitably do at some point, will Randolph accept a more limited role, or will he still want to be the Man? All of these factors will determine whether Randolph is still in town next year or not. At this point, there’s no way to know.

Larry Kuzniewski

Guard-forward Nick Calathes

3: Is Nick Calathes the backup point guard the Grizzlies have been missing?

Calathes, a 24-year-old rookie with a winning pedigree in Euroleague and Eurocup play (you may remember him from his college year at the University of Florida), has already made an impression in the preseason with his playmaking ability and drives to the basket. His size and quickness allow him to use his excellent court vision to find the open man — sometimes when the open man isn’t even looking, sending a basketball zipping into the expensive seats. (Hold on to your beers down there, courtside folks.) Even given the limited reliability of preseason games as indicators for future success, Calathes brings a confidence and maturity to the floor that we haven’t seen from a rookie since Greivis Vásquez, and Calathes moves a lot better than Vásquez. That said, he’s still unproven and has some adjusting to do to the NBA game. If Calathes can be a floor general to spell Conley for large stretches, though, the Grizzlies will be in better shape point-guard-wise than they’ve been in years.

4: How much will the Grizzlies miss Rudy Gay’s offensive efficiency?

Next question.

Larry Kuzniewski

Forward Ed Davis

5: Who is going to be the backup power forward?

The popular opinion is that Ed Davis was brought to Memphis by the front office specifically to be the power forward of the future and that Davis is all but guaranteed to ascend to Zach Randolph’s starting spot when Randolph is inevitably moved. Some national media types even speculated that Randolph would be traded this offseason in order to clear the way for Davis. That didn’t happen and for good reason: Davis still needs time to develop. He doesn’t finish at the rim as well as he probably should, and he spent most of last year on the bench in Lionel Hollins’ infamous doghouse rather than on the court gaining valuable experience. He’s likely to get those minutes from Dave Joerger, who has stressed time and again his belief and confidence in Davis’ abilities. In preseason thus far, he’s been true to his word, playing Davis a lot and starting him in Randolph’s absence against the Bucks.

What’s made it a question is the play of Jon Leuer. Leuer, who barely saw the floor last year after being acquired from the Cavaliers in January, was signed to a long-term (though relatively inexpensive) deal this summer and has entered the 2013 preseason playing like a man with something to prove. He’s looked confident, comfortable, and assured on the court, and his long-range jumper has proved valuable to the Grizzlies’ floor spacing.

With Davis still needing some time to develop before the Grizzlies can really evaluate whether his basket is the one in which the Grizzlies want to put all of their eggs, it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that Leuer and Davis could share the backup minutes at the four spot depending on matchups. Ultimately, this depth is a good thing, especially on a Griz team that has been severely lacking in frontcourt depth for as long as anyone can remember. But it certainly won’t make answering questions about whether Ed Davis is the future any easier.

6: If the Grizzlies struggle this year, what will that do to their burgeoning fan base?

This is one question nobody likes to talk about. The Grizzlies’ recent run of successful seasons has brought with it a level of Griz Fever heretofore unseen in Memphis. The sales of unauthorized and/or unofficial Grizzlies T-shirts alone have probably been enough to boost the local economy by 50 percent. Everyone is talking about the Grizzlies, and Griz fans are making a name for themselves nationally as loud, proud, and die-hard.

But what happens to those fans if the team hovers around .500 this year and struggles to get itself together under the first year of a new coach? What happens if, God forbid, an important player suffers a major injury and misses a significant stretch of the season? Are the fans who made articles of clothing out of Growl Towels going to stick it out, or will they turn on the team and the front office, in light of all of the changes made by the new regime to a roster and organization that was (from outside appearances, anyway) working?

To be clear, I don’t think the team will trend downward this year, but the Western Conference finals are a high bar that not many teams are able to reach — much less reach two years in a row. If the team’s newly won fans expect the same level of performance this year and things start to go south, it could create some interesting tension around the team.

Larry Kuzniewski

Guard Jerryd Bayless

7: What will be the first in-season roster move the Grizzlies make?

I don’t think the Grizzlies expected Jerryd Bayless to pick up the player option in his contract and stay with the Grizzlies another year. I think they expected him to become a free agent and sign a contract that he earned by playing well for the Grizzlies last year. That’s not what happened, though: Bayless stayed in Memphis, and now the Grizzlies have an awful lot of shooting guards. Tony Allen, Quincy Pondexter, Bayless, and rookie Jamaal Franklin can all play the position, along with the occasional Nick Calathes. Bayless’ responsibilities as backup point guard were absolved last year after he proved to be a much more effective playmaker off the ball, especially when paired with Mike Conley.

At the same time, Tayshaun Prince is probably entering the twilight phase of his career, after many years of making deep playoff runs with the Detroit Pistons, and his conditioning failed him in last year’s playoffs even though he showed flashes of “the old Tayshaun” before getting injured in the Oklahoma City series.

Both of these guys, I’d say, are probably available to a team that makes the Grizzlies the right offer. What that offer would be I can’t say, but given that Prince is owed $7.2 million this year and $7.7 million next year, you’d have to think some salary relief would be involved. Don’t misunderstand me: I think both players could also stick around and make valuable contributions to the Grizzlies this year. I just think that of everyone on the roster, they’re probably the two who would be traded first if the right option came along.

8: Is the Wi-Fi in FedExForum going to work this year?

Robert Pera says yes. We shall see. One gets the impression that it may be even harder to make internet access work for 18,000 people sitting in the same room than it is to evaluate draft prospects.

9: What effect will Kosta Koufos have coming off the Grizzlies’ bench?

Koufos started 81 games for the Denver Nuggets last season, so the fact that the Grizzlies were able to pry him away from Denver for a never-quite-healthy Darrell Arthur and what essentially amounts to pocket lint is surprising. Koufos represents the best chance Marc Gasol has ever had of not having to play 40-plus minutes a night this year. He averaged eight points and almost seven rebounds per game last year in Denver, and his size, toughness, and basketball IQ mean that Gasol has a legitimate NBA center as a backup for maybe the first time in his career. (I’m not counting Darko Milicic.) A reduced workload for Gasol means a fresher Gasol in the playoffs, and anything that makes that happen while strengthening the Griz bench is a win.

Larry Kuzniewski

Guard Mike Conley

10: Where will the Grizzlies finish in the Western Conference this year?

The Western Conference is as competitive and as close as it’s ever been. The Spurs, Thunder, Grizzlies, and Clippers all look primed to make another run, and the Rockets and Warriors made significant improvements in the off-season.

The Grizzlies are going to have to work that much harder for home-court advantage this year, and simply catching one or two unlucky breaks over the course of the season may be enough to put them down to the fifth or sixth seed.

Last year’s seeding battle was close, but this year it looks to be even closer. The Grizzlies could legitimately finish anywhere from second to about sixth in the standings, and the separation between those spots could be as small as a game or two. The breaks of the season will determine it as much as their actual win/loss record will.

The offseason brought with it a host of changes to the Grizzlies from top to bottom. Really, this season is the first manifestation of the philosophy brought in with last year’s ownership change, and we’re just now seeing the fruits of that transition on the court and in the front office.

We know what the Grizzlies organization is trying to do. The only question is whether they’ll be able to do it. As of right now, it’s anybody’s guess — yet another question that remains to be answered.

Categories
Beyond the Arc Sports

Deflections: Late Notes on Joerger, Allen Reaction, Free Agency Update

Dorell Wright: The new Beyond-the-Arc-approved top realistic free-agent target.

  • Dorell Wright: The new Beyond-the-Arc-approved top realistic free-agent target.

Updated Free Agent List: As I illustrated in the previous post, the Grizzlies now find themselves with one open roster spot left to get to the minimum 13 and just a few million to spend without heading into the luxury tax. Barring a trade, expect the team to pursue a three-point shooter who can play small forward and can be had for under $4 million. I outlined most of these candidates in my offseason preview on Sunday. One new name to add to the list: Luigi Datome, an Italian forward who popped up in reports earlier this week as a subject of interest of both the Grizzlies and Celtics. I don’t know much about Datome, He’s 25 years old. He’s 6’9”. He shot 39% from three in the Italian League last season. In theory, Datome seems to fit the parameters of what the Grizzlies are looking for. I asked someone — outside the Grizzlies organization — who does research and projections on European prospects about Datome and the response I got was that he projects as a “replacement level” player and seems to be something of “an Italian Austin Daye.” That doesn’t sound like much, but Daye will be on an NBA roster next season, so Datome sounds viable.

Yahoo’s Marc Spears reports today that the Grizzlies are among the teams interested in Dorrell Wright — the highest-rated player on my own free-agent board who is still unsigned. No surprise there. It’s also been reported that Matt Barnes — who hit a bushel of threes against the Grizzlies in his final NBA game last season — is now talking to teams other than the Clippers, and you can bet the Grizzlies are taking a look there. I still harbor some hope the Grizzlies will make a play for Kyle Korver, but that seems unlikely, both because doing so would likely put the team in the tax and there are suitors who can offer more than the full mid-level exception.

My own updated “small forward shooter” rankings based on what we now know:

1. Dorrell Wright
2. Matt Barnes
3. Carlos Delfino
4. Francisco Garcia
5. Omri Casspi (personal fave)
6. Luigi Datome (ranking theme song)
7. Austin Daye
8. Anthony Morrow

Marc Stein Interview: I guested and co-hosted on The Chris Vernon Show for a while today, with Verno and I interviewing ESPN.com’s Marc Stein about the free agency landscape. You can hear that interview here.

Categories
Beyond the Arc Sports

Report: Joerger Tapped to Lead Griz

Dave Joerger

  • Dave Joerger

According to a report last night from ESPN.com’s Kevin Arnovitz, the Grizzlies have reached an agreement in principle to name longtime assistant Dave Joerger the team’s new head coach, bringing a presumptive end to a process that began when the team declined to offer incumbent head coach a new contract a few weeks ago.

The 39-year-old Joerger has spent six seasons on the Grizzlies bench, joining the team as part of Marc Iavaroni’s staff and surviving the transition to Lionel Hollins a year-and-a-half later, where Joerger was later elevated to lead assisstant.

Long considered the frontrunner for the job, Joerger won five titles in three different leagues over seven minor league seasons as a young head coach. He will now get the chance to test those skills at the highest level.

As of yesterday, a source with the team had speculated that the Grizzlies would be unlikely to make a coaching announcement prior to Thursday’s NBA draft, and the team has not officially confirmed Joerger’s hire. But with the news leaking late Monday night, one expects an announcement will now come sooner rather than later.

Categories
Beyond the Arc Sports

Deflections: Monta Ellis, A Coaching Theory, Finals Ratings

1. Does Monta Make Sense?

Monta Ellis

  • Monta Ellis

I wasn’t going to get into free agency and other off-season speculation until after next week’s draft, but here’s one that landed in our lap: Milwaukee Bucks guard Monta Ellis is reportedly opting out of the final year of his current contract, at $11 million, turning down a reported extension offer of two years and $24 million in the process and becoming a free agent this summer. Soon after that report, Bucks beat writer Gery Woelfel suggested on Twitter than Ellis has told friends he would be interested in playing for the Grizzlies.

What to make of this? On the first item, the odds of Ellis matching the three years and $35 million he allegedly left on the table in Milwaukee seem slim, but maybe he just wants to be out of Milwaukee that badly. The odds of Ellis getting a similar contract from the Grizzlies is close to zero, but the idea that he would target the Grizzlies is not surprising. Ellis is a Mississippi native who makes his off-season home in Memphis. Coming to Memphis would also likely land him in a winning situation with a team that needs more scoring and shot creation.

Still, there are plenty of hurdles and questions standing in the way of this theoretical partnership.

Is it financially feasible?:

I’ll break down the Grizzlies’ cap situation in more detail in a couple of weeks, but based on published salaries, the Grizzlies projected roster payroll for next season is currently at $57,567,539 for eight players (Conley, Gasol, Randolph, Prince, Pondexter, Davis, Arthur, Wroten). Add cap holds and draft picks and the Grizzlies will enter the free agency period above the projected salary cap line of $58.5 million but below the projected luxury tax line of $71.5 million. This will give the team access to the full mid-level exception, which starts at $5.15 million, which would be the most the Grizzlies could offer any outside free agent this summer in terms of starting salary.

However, that’s not the only method via which the Grizzlies could acquire Ellis or a player of similar stature. The team also has a trade exception of nearly $7.5 million from the Rudy Gay deal. But the financial issues at play here go beyond merely the rules that govern player acquisition.

Categories
Sports Sports Feature

Grizzlies Coaching Clarity

A few things I know as the Grizzlies part ways with Lionel Hollins and officially embark on a new era:

This shouldn’t be that surprising: Lionel Hollins’ fate as Grizzlies coach was always dependent on the resolution of conflicting normalcies: “Don’t mess with success” vs. “New owners hire new people.” When Hollins bristled publicly about the Grizzlies’ new front office on multiple occasions mid-season, the odds tipped in the favor of change, but that didn’t seal his fate. Instead, closing interviews — not just with Hollins but with others around the organization — seemed to convince team CEO Jason Levien to make the change he probably always desired.

There are many factors at play in this unpopular decision, but it’s ultimately about an apparently unbridgeable cultural divide: Hollins is of the “you provide the players, I’ll coach them” mold. Levien and controlling owner Robert Pera want to forge a more collaborative organizational culture, one where the coaching staff doesn’t just receive players from the team’s front office but also actionable information. Even as Hollins publicly dismissed talk about “philosophical differences,” those very differences were on display.

“Risk” and “mistake” are different things: “Don’t mess with success” is pretty persuasive if you ask me, but to call this a mistake is to assume a future, and I don’t put that much stock in the importance of Hollins or any individual coach. But it’s certainly a risk. There are obviously coaches out there who can work better with his bosses. There are also a smaller number who can be as or more successful on the floor. There’s a smaller group still who can do both. And there’s no guarantee this or any front office can successfully choose that person no matter how good a hire seems at the time. Past Grizzlies history is instructive here.

It could have been handled better but was always going to be messy: Hollins’ success is too glaring in the context of franchise history, his community roots now too deep and personal, and his status as a successful black leader in a city (really, country) where race impacts perception too meaningful for his removal to ever be easy. But Hollins’ own awkward media tour and Levien’s man-behind-the-curtain disappearing act made a bad situation worse.

Jason Levien needs to shore up his public diplomacy: I have little doubt that Levien ran this move by players, minority owners, and others around the organization and knew a coaching change would not cause a revolt. But the Grizzlies are at once a private enterprise and public trust, and the community needs a fuller and more personal explanation than the brief, antiseptic press release the team put out Monday night. Levien needs to explain this decision, in direct but polite terms.

For better or worse — and I think it’s both — this is a “speak to the Rotary Club, hobnob at the college football game, banter on the radio shows” kind of market. Levien is a bright man undertaking a big job, but he needs work in this area.

Fan outrage is a by-product of fan investment: The despair in some quarters over a coaching change — something that’s happened with nearly half the NBA in recent months, including several other playoff teams — is a bit much, but it also speaks to the number of new fans created over the past few seasons. That increase in interest is a positive for the organization, but the lack of perspective from many new converts also suggests their fandom is precarious. Ups and downs are unavoidable for most pro sports organizations, but the growing fan base here isn’t stable enough to fully withstand a downturn right now, and the reaction to this move underscores that.

This is about the future: This coaching change won’t alter the Grizzlies’ projection for next season in the minds of most who follow the NBA closely. Coaches matter, but rosters matter much more. What fans need to understand is that the Grizzlies were heading into a period of transition even without a coaching change. How the new ownership and front office manages this transition — not just this offseason but in the next couple as well — will determine their ultimate success or failure.

A longer version of this column can be found at “Beyond the Arc,” Chris Herrington’s Grizzlies blog, at memphisflyer.com.

Categories
Beyond the Arc Sports

Coaching Clarity: Two or Three Things I Know about the Hollins’ Situation

Dave Joerger [right] may be next in line as Lionel Hollins tenure as Grizzlies head coach ends.

  • LARRY KUZNIEWSKI
  • Dave Joerger [right] may be next in line as Lionel Hollins’ tenure as Grizzlies’ head coach ends.

If coach Lionel Hollins and general manager Chris Wallace weren’t part of the Grizzlies’ future, an uninformed onlooker wouldn’t have known it from the team’s draft workout Monday morning, where Hollins and Wallace sat at the back of the gym talking and new chief decision-maker Jason Levien was nowhere to be seen. But clarity finally came to the Grizzlies’ increasingly messy coaching situation later that day, with the team announcing, via an official release, that it had severed ties with Hollins, whose contract was set to expire at the end of the month.

A few things I know as the Grizzlies officially embark on a new era:

This shouldn’t be that surprising: Lionel Hollins’ fate as Grizzlies coach was always dependent on the resolution of conflicting normalcies: “Don’t mess with success” vs. “New owners hire new people.” When Hollins bristled publicly about the Grizzlies’ new front office on multiple occasions mid-season, the odds tipped in the favor of change but that didn’t seal his fate. Instead, closing interviews — not just with Hollins but with others around the organization — seemed to convince team CEO Jason Levien to make the change he probably always desired.

There are many factors at play in this unpopular decision, but it’s ultimately about an apparently unbridgeable cultural divide: Hollins is of the “you provide the players, I’ll coach them” mold. Levien and controlling owner Robert Pera want to forge a more collaborative organizational culture, one where everyone is working on the same track and the coaching staff doesn’t just receive players from the team’s front office, but also actionable information. Even as Hollins publicly dismissed talk about “philosophical differences,” those very differences were on display.

Film references are instructive (at least for me): Via Japanese master Akira Kurosawa there’s the Rashomon effect, in which truth is difficult to uncover because people tend to give contradictory interpretations of the same event. Hollins, by his account, thought his exit meeting with Levien and Pera went really well. Levien and Pera apparently thought otherwise. Via French titan Jean Renoir’s The Rules of the Game is the wisdom of “The awful thing about life is this: Everybody has their reasons.” It’s equally easy to see — at least to me — why Hollins would assume he’d earned a new deal and also why Levien would be reluctant to commit a long-term contract to a coach with whom he didn’t think he could have a productive working relationship. Blame feels irrelevant.

“Risk” and “mistake” are different things: “Don’t mess with success” is pretty persuasive if you ask me, but to call this a mistake is to assume a future, and I don’t put that much stock in the importance of Hollins or any individual coach. But it’s certainly a risk. There are obviously coaches out there who can work better with his bosses. There are also a smaller number who can be as or more successful on the floor. There’s a smaller group still who can do both. And there’s no guarantee this or any front office can successfully choose that person no matter how good a hire seems at the time. Past Grizzlies history is instructive here.

But, to his credit, Levien showed a confidence and willingness to make unpopular decisions with the Rudy Gay trade, though the team was on firmer ground there, even if a lot of traditionalists didn’t know it (and still don’t). The risk is greater this time.

Categories
Beyond the Arc Sports

The Coaching Endgame? — Griz Give Hollins Permission to Shop Around

Is the clock ticking on Lionel Hollins coaching tenure with the Grizzliesl?

  • LARRY KUZNIEWSKI
  • Is the clock ticking on Lionel Hollins’ coaching tenure with the Grizzliesl?

Major movement erupted on the Grizzlies’ coaching front Sunday afternoon when multiple outlets reported that the Grizzlies had given head coach Lionel Hollins permission to negotiate with other teams after an apparent bad turn in talks between Hollins and the Grizzlies. (Sorry. I was traveling when all of this came tumbling out. I have no idea who reported it first.)

Most stories cite sources as saying “major philosophical differences” were the reason talks stalled even before the sides could negotiate potential contract terms. It’s hard to be too surprised by this. In citing a series of questions and concerns that might prevent Hollins from returning to the Grizzlies’ sideline next season, I led with “implementing organizational philosophy” when working through The Coaching Question back in April. Revisiting the issue in May, I wrote this:

Given the on-going success of this postseason and the team’s player-contract situation, bringing the current core back next season now looks likely, and bringing Hollins back to coach it preferable. But this core has a two-year expiration date. So, is Hollins the right coach to preside over the transition to a new roster and potentially new style, the territory a new contract would take him into?

When that becomes part of the question, then issues about Hollins’ commitment to and ability to implement a new organizational philosophy, as well as his development of young assets begin to loom larger.

A second issue with a new long-term contract for Hollins — and one I’d prefer not to get too far into right now because if feels unnecessarily trouble-making, but here we are — is the opportunity cost in likely losing lead assistant Dave Joerger to a head-coaching opportunity elsewhere. Joerger has been, in large part — let’s not deny Hollins his due credit here as well — the architect of what may be the league’s best defense and has a compelling head-coaching pedigree at the minor-league level. There are many who believe he could be the next Tom Thibodeau or Erik Spoelstra. While Hollins may be the best coach for the present, does a long-term deal close off the possibility of Joerger in the future?

Though sources close to the talks have apparently stressed that a deal could still be reached, those two issues — Hollins’ potential incompatibility with the organizational philosophy and the long-term considerations that have to come into play when considering a likely four-year commitment — are the ones that now seem to be driving Hollins and the team apart. In both of those earlier posts, I concluded that losing Hollins would be very risky and that I felt the team was likely to try to bring him back. My opinion hasn’t changed on the former, but on the latter the tea leaves were pointing in the other direction last week, which Chris Vernon and I talked about on his show on Thursday.

A few thoughts on where we are now: