Categories
Cover Feature News

Inside the MPD

In the wake of the killing of Tyre Nichols by members of the Memphis Police Department’s SCORPION Unit in January 2023, the Department of Justice (DOJ) initiated an investigation of the MPD to determine if officers regularly violated citizens’ rights. After 18 months of reviewing case files and video, interviewing Memphians, riding along with officers, and observing the inner workings of the MPD, the DOJ released its findings on December 4th. The 70-page report concludes, “After an extensive investigation, the Department of Justice has reasonable cause to believe that the MPD and the city engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives people of their rights under the Constitution and federal law.”

“Don’t Kill Me!” 

The DOJ investigators highlighted four key findings: 1. MPD uses excessive force. 2. MPD conducts unlawful stops, searches, and arrests. 3. MPD unlawfully discriminates against Black people in its enforcement activities. 4. The city and MPD unlawfully discriminate in their response to people with behavioral health disabilities. To support these findings, investigators cited numerous instances of violence by MPD officers against the citizens of Memphis. “Excessive force is routine in MPD,” DOJ investigators write. “Officers use force as a first resort, demand unquestioning obedience, and exact punishment if they do not receive it.”

Nine police cars and 12 officers responded to a call where a mentally ill man stole a $2 soft drink from a convenience store. After he put his hands up to surrender, he was beaten. He screamed, “Don’t kill me!” and tried to run away. He was subdued and repeatedly tased while face-down on the ground, then served two days in jail for disorderly conduct and theft. 

In another case, three officers tackled a man who had littered in a public park. “The man had done nothing wrong, but was ‘talking all this shit,’ according to one officer, and would not tell the officers his name. When the man dropped his drink while leaving the park, four officers surrounded him. … While handcuffed in the patrol car later, the man told a lieutenant that he was trying to follow the officers’ directions, but they had already decided to charge him: ‘I even offered to pick the can up.’”

The DOJ report finds fatal flaws in the MPD’s frontline strategy. “Memphis has relied on traffic stops to address violent crime. The police department has encouraged officers in specialized units, task forces, and patrol to prioritize street enforcement. Officers and community members have described this approach as ‘saturation,’ or flooding neighborhoods with traffic stops. This strategy involves frequent contact with the public and gives wide discretion to officers, which requires close supervision and clear rules to direct officers’ activity. But MPD does not ensure that officers conduct themselves in a lawful manner.” 

In two instances cited in the report, officers followed drivers to their destinations and confronted them for traffic violations. One woman was standing on the porch of a relative’s house. After she didn’t produce ID and told the police they were “not welcome on the property,” officers cuffed her, roughed her up, and threatened to pepper spray her. The report states, “After locking her in a police car, one officer asked, ‘So what did we see her do?’ When an officer suggested the woman’s car had improperly tinted windows, another officer responded, ‘All this for a tint?’ The officer shook his head and gestured with his hand that the woman talked too much.”

In another incident, officers forced their way into the home of a woman accused of driving with expired tags and failing to stop at a stop sign. “No exigent circumstances demanded they enter the woman’s home, and the officers had no justification to use force to push their way inside for a nonviolent traffic infraction,” reads the report. After arresting the woman in front of her crying child, “… one officer reflected, ‘In the grand scheme of things, this does not seem like it was worth it.’” 

Officers frequently use potentially deadly neck restraints, similar to the one Minneapolis Police Department members applied fatally to George Floyd when he was killed in 2020. In Memphis, an intoxicated man was repeatedly choked into submission until he urinated on himself. “He was not charged with any crime.” 

After offering a ride home to a man suffering a mental health crisis, the police uncovered an outstanding warrant for theft. The officer pulled the man from the police car, saying, “You’re fixing to get your ass whupped.” When the man tried to flee, the officer beat him and put him in a neck restraint. 

Officers were frequently observed beating, tasing, and pepper spraying people who were already restrained and posed no threat. “One officer hit a handcuffed man in the face and torso with a baton eight times.” 

In addition, “Officers repeatedly permitted police dogs to bite or continue to bite people, including children, who were nonresistant and attempting to surrender.” 

In one incident, an officer investigating a stolen vehicle report “fired at a car at least eight times at a fast food drive-thru in the middle of the day, jeopardizing other officers and bystanders. … MPD’s investigation improperly found that this use of deadly force was justified.” 

In a sidebar titled “Sick of his fucking mouth,” the DOJ investigators write, “MPD officers escalate incidents involving minor offensives by responding to perceived insults, disrespect, or ‘verbal resistance’ with unconstitutional force. … Some MPD officers seem to believe that questioning their authority justifies force — as one supervisor told us, ‘If someone says, “I ain’t under arrest,” that’s resisting arrest right there.’” 

Children were not spared the MPD’s methods. When one 16-year-old girl called police to report that she had been assaulted, she ended up in handcuffs. “After three hours, officers removed the handcuffs to reposition them. As she complained that her hands were hurt and swollen and tried to move her wrists, the officers grabbed her and pushed her face down onto the ground to handcuff her again. The girl was then arrested and charged with disorderly conduct.”

When officers were dispersing a crowd after a fight at a high school football game, one officer singled out a “relatively small-statured teen girl trying to leave the premises, yelling ‘Bye! Bye!’ at her. The officer’s taunts provoked the girl, who talked back. In response, the officer shoved the girl, yelling, ‘Get out this motherfuckin’ lot.’ The girl pushed back, and two other officers approached the girl from behind and threw her on the ground. The officers then lifted the girl in the air and slammed her face down into the pavement. The officer who started the altercation told her to ‘Get your dumb ass up,’ and called her a ‘stupid bitch’ as the girl was led away in handcuffs.”

When officers chased two Black boys, aged 15 and 16, who were suspected of a curfew violation, one officer, who had dropped his mobile phone in the chase, said, “I am fucking these little kids up, man. … I am fucking you all up. I just wanted to let y’all know that.” 

In another incident, “One officer shot a teenager, and then another officer hit the teenager three times in the head with the butt of his handgun and at least 12 times with a closed fist. The teen was disarmed, seriously injured, and posed no threat at the time. Prosecutors later sent a letter to MPD stating that they ‘seriously considered recommending criminal charges’ against the officer because of the ‘more than one dozen closed fist punches to the face’ that the officer delivered. The prosecutors wrote, ‘We trust that you will handle this as an internal matter and leave it to your sound discretion.’ We saw no evidence that any further investigation took place or that any discipline was imposed. The officer remains employed at MPD.”

The report concludes, “Supervisors do not address these recurrent practices, and some at MPD defend these practices. As one field training officer told us, ‘We’re not excessive enough with these criminals. We baby them.’” 

Officers use force as a first resort; MPD treats Black people more harshly. (Photo: Department of Justice)

Black People Bear the Brunt

On page 37 of the report, DOJ investigators write, “MPD’s own data show that across a range of different law enforcement actions, MPD treats Black people more harshly than white people when they engage in similar conduct.” 

While 64 percent of Memphians are Black, 81 percent of the MPD’s traffic violations are issued to Black people. Officers issued 33.2 percent more moving violations in predominately Black neighborhoods than they did in predominately white neighborhoods. Black drivers were cited for equipment violations at 4.5 times the rate of white drivers; for improperly tinted windows, the rate was 9.8 times. Public health data indicates that both Black and white people use cannabis at the same rate, but MPD arrested Black people for marijuana possession at more than five times the rate of white people. 

The report found that the MPD stopped and cited one Black man 30 times in three years. In another case, “MPD stopped a Black man outside a dollar store ‘due to multiple robberies of dollar stores in the area,’ according to the police report. The officers had no reason to suspect that this particular man took part in the robberies, and the man told them he was just waiting for a friend. When he didn’t leave or produce ID, police handcuffed him, beat him with a baton, and pepper sprayed him. The officers had no reason to believe that the man engaged in criminal activity and lacked reasonable suspicion to stop him. But they arrested him anyway, and he spent a night in jail. Prosecutors declined to pursue any charges stemming from the incident. After the incident, the man noted, ‘They had no reason to do this. And they’re out here doing this to people every day.’”

Mental Health Crisis

In 1988, after the MPD killed a mentally ill man who was cutting himself, the city founded the Crisis Intervention Team (CIT). Composed of officers who have specialized training in dealing with behavioral health issues, the CIT became a model other city’s police departments emulated. But the DOJ found “serious problems with the CIT program,” and that “officers often escalate behavioral encounters and use combative tactics almost immediately after arriving to behavioral health calls. … We observed CIT officers in Memphis belittle and mock people with behavioral health disabilities. In one incident, a CIT officer hit a man in the head and threatened him with a Taser while officers called him a ‘motherfucker,’ ‘bitch,’ and a ‘dumbass.’” One CIT officer earned the nickname “Taser Face.”

One 8-year-old Black boy with four behavioral health diagnoses encountered the MPD nine times between December 2021 and August 2023. He was threatened with tasing, handcuffed, and repeatedly thrown onto a couch. In one incident, when the boy stuck out his tongue, the CIT officer responded by bending his arm back and screaming, “I can break your arm with the snap of my wrist.” 

The report says that while 75 percent of 911 calls involving people with mental illness are nonviolent, “MPD’s training on behavioral health primes officers to approach people with behavioral health disabilities with force and aggression, and our review revealed they often do. For instance, a training given to all new officers erroneously teaches that people with bipolar disorder do not feel pain.” 

The City Responds

At a press conference on December 5, 2024, Mayor Paul Young responded to the DOJ’s findings — while repeatedly emphasizing that he had not read the report. “I believe that even one incident of mistreatment by the police is one too many. … The report the DOJ released last night is going to be difficult to read. Some of the incidents the DOJ report described are simply not acceptable, and our hearts go out to every person who has been impacted by those actions.”

In cities such as Seattle, New Orleans, and Chicago which have previously been the subject of DOJ investigations, city governments entered into consent decrees, negotiated with the DOJ, that outline the steps police departments must take to improve. At the press conference, Young ruled out signing such a decree. “We believe adjustments we’ve already begun making must continue, and that they must expand. It’s my job as mayor to fight for the best interests of our entire community. Every member. After carefully considering the information we received from DOJ, we didn’t believe that entering into any agreement in principle or consent decree right now, before even thoroughly reading the DOJ report, would be in the best interest of our community. It’s crucial that the city has the time to do a thorough review and respond to the findings before agreeing to anything that could become a long-term financial burden to our residents, and could, in fact, actually slow down our ongoing efforts to continuously improve our police department.” 

Young cited recent statistics which show a 13 percent drop in crime overall, and a 19 percent drop in violent crimes. Police Chief C.J. Davis echoed the mayor’s position that the department is on the right track. “In some of the areas that have been outlined in the report, we have made significant changes aligned with the Department of Justice, getting their support with some of the training that has been ongoing, not just this year, but in previous years.” 

In response to the sections of the report regarding the MPD’s treatment of children, Davis said, “We spend a lot of time with our children in our community. We graduated over a thousand children from our D.A.R.E./G.R.E.A.T. program, and work consistently to try to improve those relationships. We’re going to look through the report to ensure that we’re not missing anything.”

Shelby County District Attorney Steve Mulroy has studied the full report. “I think it’s very concerning and shouldn’t be dismissed. I still think the vast majority of folks on the force are people of good faith. They have a hard job, having to make quick decisions in stressful, sometimes dangerous situations. But that doesn’t mean there can’t be systemic issues of culture, training, and supervision that cry out for reform.”

When Shahidah Jones of the Official Black Lives Matter Memphis Chapter read the report, she recalls thinking, “Not to be cynical, but it was just like, ‘Duh.’ We didn’t choose to target police because we didn’t have anything else to do or we were looking at these one-off instances. A very large part of organizing is for us to learn history and do our political study. … This is not something new. This is the way police have been taught to operate.” 

Josh Spickler, executive director of criminal justice-reform nonprofit Just City, agrees. “I’m not particularly surprised by the report. I recognize some of these stories, some of the examples from media reports. Many of these things are well-documented and well-known incidents. And the findings are bad and awful, and as even Mayor Young said, hard to read, but they are not surprising.”

For Amber Sherman, who lobbied the city council for reform in the wake of the Tyre Nichols killing, the report felt like vindication. “My immediate action really was that it just corroborated everything that, you know, we as organizers here in Memphis have been saying for so long, especially with Decarcerate Memphis, where we’ve been really pressing the issue about pretextual stops and how dangerous they are.”

Decarcerate Memphis’ Alex Hensley, who drafted the reform ordinances which were passed by the city council in reduced forms after the Tyre Nichols killing, says she, too, feels vindicated by the report. “Activists and organizers have been saying all of these things for years on end, and then to have the DOJ — which is a policing entity, by the way — to say that, yeah, we need to not prioritize these low-level violations.” 

DA Mulroy says, “We need to rethink about using specialized units for routine enforcement. And distinguish between traffic stops that actually affect safety or real crime, like moving violations and drive-out tag fraud violations, which make sense. But some of these minor equipment violations, the data shows the hit rate on those is very low — you’re talking like 2 to 3 percent of the time do you find weapons or drugs or somebody that’s wanted on a serious charge. But the data also show those are precisely the types of offenses that are associated with racial profiling. You really have to think about what kind of a bang you’re getting for your buck. You’re potentially alienating the community that you most want to cooperate with law enforcement because they’re the ones who see the crime.” 

City council member Dr. Jeff Warren said he had not yet read the report. “If you remember, around the time that Black Lives Matter occurred after the George Floyd killing, the council began a process where we were involved with the police department, trying to initiate reforms. Some of the reforms that we actually initiated were negated by the state legislature. … I think we’ve been in the process of reform since this current police chief came on board; we’re doing that right now. That’s one of the reasons I don’t really think that the city needs to be entering into a consent decree that will cost taxpayers multiple millions of dollars, when it’s something we’re already trying to do.”

When asked about the DOJ’s finding that MPD recruits are taught that people with bipolar disorder cannot feel pain, Warren, a family physician, responded, “I don’t know where they got that from. Just because it’s written in a report doesn’t mean that’s the truth.”

The treatment of what the MPD calls “mental consumers” is one issue where there may be consensus on reform. The DOJ report cites multiple high-ranking MPD officers, as well as Memphis Fire Department officials and 911 call-takers, who believe that a new department specializing in mental health situations is needed to shift the burden from the MPD. 

“We should listen to them on that,” says Hensley. “If this city is so pro-police, listen to them on this subject. Clearly, there are a lot of mental health calls and a lot of mental health issues within our community that I think tie back to these issues of poverty, lack of housing, lack of investments in basic necessities. We have to come up with something different.” 

Spickler says, “There’s data that shows that most interactions with people in mental health crises are not violent. There are ways of responding that wouldn’t lead you to have to tell people falsely that people with bipolar don’t feel pain. One of the great suggestions of this report is that we don’t have to send an armed person to some of the things that we send them to, like a stranded motorist, traffic accidents, and mental health calls. These are all things that can be handled with someone who has safety and resolution as their mission and not what we have in this police department — and most police departments, frankly — and that is a warrior mentality. There’s an arrogance to it, and there’s an offensiveness to it. 

“There’s nothing about policing that should be offensive. It’s ‘to protect and serve,’ right? Many police departments across America have tried to shift to a guardian model, which is how policing, I think, is most effective. But throughout that report, you see very clear evidence that that is not the case at the Memphis Police Department. There is no guardian mentality. It’s not taught; it’s not modeled. It’s really not expected. What is expected is that you get what you want by whatever means necessary.” 

Will Anything Change?

The election of Donald Trump, who has promised a “brutal approach” to law enforcement, has brought the next steps into question. Whether a future DOJ would sue to impose a settlement with the city is an open question.

“I’m not gonna speculate about their motivations, but I think it’s obvious to anybody that there’s a very good chance that a lot of this will be dropped or, at a minimum, they’ll be less aggressive about enforcing it with the new administration,” says DA Mulroy. “We’ve seen that before with the prior Trump administration. That could be anyone’s calculus in dealing with the aftermath of November 5th.”

At his press conference, Mayor Young said, “We would have the same position regardless of the outcome of the presidential election.” 

A consent decree with the DOJ would result in federal monitors being assigned to the MPD in order to ensure that they do not violate citizens’ constitutional rights. In his regular Friday email on December 6th, Young wrote, “Instead of a broad and potentially prolonged federal oversight via a consent decree — which could impose millions in costs on our residents — we believe by taking a holistic, community-focused approach we can move further and faster toward the change we need with less cost to our community.”

These costs must be weighed against the costs of not acting, says Hensley. “I think they’re going to pay for it one way or another. First of all, they’re bloating the costs. We’ve looked at other cities, some of them have been high, but it’s spread out over time. There are just all these other elements that are being left out to make it seem like we’re going to go bankrupt next year. That’s disingenuous. Tyre Nichols’ family is suing them for $500 million — and that’s just one person. I’m not their chief financial officer, but you can look at that clearly and see the costs are going to be far worse if they don’t sign the consent decree, or if they don’t do these reforms.” 

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Criminal Justice Advocates: “We Need DOJ Involvement” On MPD Reform

Community organizations are urging Memphis Mayor Paul Young to enter a consent decree with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) in the aftermath of the agency’s findings on the Memphis Police Department (MPD).

The Black Clergy Collaborative of Memphis, Memphis Interfaith Coalition For Action and Hope (MICAH), and Just City released a letter urging Young to sign the agreement. They said the DOJ’s findings found MPD to have consistent practices of discrimination and civil rights violations – many of which citizens had advocated against for years.

In hopes of remedying these issues, the organizations said the city should include the DOJ in its next steps with an “independent monitor.” They also noted Young’s concern for the financial risks a consent decree would impose, which is why he said the city will not enter an agreement.

“[Mayor Young]  thinks the city and MPD can correct these abuses without DOJ involvement,” the letter said. “We can think of no instance when a just society allowed the abuser of others to determine how they would fix their behavior. Just societies always intervene and prescribe what the abuser must do, monitors the abuser, and decides when the correction has occurred, which is precisely what a consent decree would aim to do.”

The letter said while they support the mayor, they don’t believe he would be able to supervise officers and conduct and review incident videos while carrying out his mayoral responsibilities. 

“We have no trust or confidence in leaving corrections to the people involved in the unlawful conduct, the persons who failed to supervise them, or those who stood by and said nothing while the unlawful conduct occurred. We need DOJ involvement,” the letter said.

Young reported that several cities, such as Chicago and New Orleans, have consent decrees that have cost them millions of dollars with crime rates still on the rise. Organizers said these references imply “ a connection without data or proof.”

While the letter said they don’t know how decrees are calculated or other factors contributing to these numbers, they cannot “use these numbers to compare or estimate the cost of a consent decree in Memphis.”

Organizers said under a consent decree the city must pay a monitor and their team to track their compliance with the DOJ’s plan and recommendations while also providing regular updates based on “agreed-upon metrics.” Memphis will also be required to cover any fines and fees imposed by the federal court if the MPD repeatedly fails to adhere to the consent decree.

“Memphis can limit the financial cost of the decree simply by complying with its requirements,” officials said. “Regardless of the cost, we know that protecting the lives of Memphians, especially persons with disabilities and children is priceless, too valuable not to sign the decree.”

They also referenced citizens who voiced their concern for MPD as they said they work hard with a “short staff” and they are “underpaid, outgunned on the streets, and continue to be beaten down (low morale)” as criminals are emboldened in their practice. 

Organizers said there may be validity in these statements, but that doesn’t mean MPD’s behavior described in the report is justified.

“It is possible and necessary to address abusive conduct and establish lawful and effective public safety practices while acknowledging the challenging nature of the work and respecting officers who perform the job well,” they said.

In addition to urging the mayor to sign the agreement, the letter also recommends developing a peacekeeping force to aid in police reform.

“Our confidence in affecting positive, lasting, tailored change is grounded in the DOJ’s authority to secure the reforms of unconstitutional patterns and practices identified within MPD,” the letter said.

Organizers are currently asking citizens to sign a petition to urge Young to enter a decree which can be found here.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Patriot Bank to Invest $1.9 Million in Lending Discrimination Case

Patriot Bank will spend nearly $2 million to rectify allegations of lending discrimination towards communities of color in Memphis, according to U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officials.

Bank officials said they voluntarily agreed to collaborate with the DOJ. In the settlement, the bank will pay $1.9 million to “resolve allegations that the bank engaged in a pattern of or practice of lending discrimination by redlining majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in Memphis, Tennessee.”

The DOJ’s original complaint was brought against Patriot Bank under the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. These acts prohibit discrimination for home loans on the basis of race and color. They also prohibit redlining.

“From 2015 through at least 2020, Patriot engaged in a pattern or practice of unlawful redlining,” the complaint reads. “Patriot avoided providing home loans and other mortgage services in majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in and around Memphis, Tennessee.”

The DOJ alleges that from 2015 through 2020, Patriot’s redlining activities included having locations and a majority of their branches and loan production offices and all its mortgage loan officers in majority-white neighborhoods. The bank was also accused of avoiding marketing in these areas.

The Justice Department added that while the bank may have received loan applications from applicants in majority-Black and Hispanic areas, it found that they were “disproportionately white.” The agency also found during the six-year period, other banks “received nearly 3.5 times as many loan applications,” in communities of color.

“As a result of the above-described practices, Patriot generated disproportionately low numbers of loan applications and home loans during each year in the relevant time period from majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in and around Memphis, as compared to similarly situated lenders,” the complaint says.

However, bank leaders said they do not understand why the DOJ “pursued this matter,” and said Patriot Bank “originated a greater number of mortgage loans in Black and Hispanic areas in the city of Memphis than hundreds of other lenders.”

“Patriot ranked 14th out of 482 lenders in making mortgage loans in minority areas of Memphis in 2021 and 15th out of 534 lenders in 2022,” reads a statement from Patriot Bank. “In Tipton County, Patriot ranked first, second or third in making loans in minority areas in each year from 2015 to the present.”

About $1.3 million of the settlement funds will be used to increase access to home mortgage, home improvement, and home refinancing for residents of majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. The bank will also spend $375,000 to increase advertising and other credit and outreach-based opportunities focused on those same neighborhoods. Also, $250,000 will be used on “community partnerships to provide services that increase residential mortgage credit access for residents of those neighborhoods.”

Under the proposed consent order, the bank must also ensure that at least two mortgage loan officers serve the majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the city while also employing a director of community lending for continued development of lending in these neighborhoods.

“The actions described in the consent order embrace the programs that Patriot has already had in place for years, and Patriot is pleased to continue with its existing initiatives that demonstrate the bank’s commitment to communities of color,” said Keith Barger, vice chairman of Patriot Bank and CEO of Patriot Bank Mortgage.

The bank, which opened in Millington in 2001, has eight full-service banks in Millington, Arlington, Collierville, Rosemark, and Raleigh Springs in Shelby County, and Covington, Covington South and South Tipton in Tipton County.

“For too long, practices like redlining and discriminatory lending have been used to undermine the promises of our economic system,” said U.S. Attorney Kevin G. Ritz for the Western District of Tennessee. “Our office is committed to enforcing fair lending laws and ensuring that banks and lenders are providing communities of color equal access to credit and lending opportunities. This agreement with Patriot Bank signifies an important step toward preserving economic justice and for communities of color in Memphis as they buy homes, start businesses, and take part in the American Dream.”

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Locals Respond to DOJ Investigation Into MPD

Many local leaders are hailing the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation into the Memphis Police Department (MPD) as “the right course of action” to address “systemic issues” within the department.

DOJ officials announced Thursday they are opening a civil rights investigation into the city of Memphis and the MPD.

Kristen Clarke, assistant attorney general for the civil rights division of the DOJ’s local office said that this investigation will determine “whether there is a pattern or practice of conduct that violates the Constitution or our federal civil rights law.”

Clarke said the move is not in response to a single incident or event, nor is it “confined to a specific unit or type of unit within the MPD.

Local leaders began sharing their thoughts about the investigation after a press conference on the matter Thursday afternoon.

Shelby County District Attorney Steve Mulroy

“I’m pleased the DOJ is investigating civil rights practices within the MPD. While I’m sure most officers are people of good faith, we have systemic issues we need to address. The Tyre Nichols incident was not a one-off, but suggests wider problems of culture.

Only an outside investigation can restore the public confidence we need to get the community cooperating with law enforcement, which is the most important thing to bend the curve on crime. And only DOJ can provide the kind of thorough investigation into systemic practices that we need to restore public confidence.” 

Memphis mayoral candidate Michelle McKissack

“This independent investigation is the right course of action. We need transparency and truth surrounding the tragic death of Tyre Nichols and patterns of misconduct within MPD.

Our community must have trust and faith in the Memphis Police Department. As mayor, I would be committed to fully cooperating with the investigation because it will leave us with a stronger department and a safer city.” 

Attorneys Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci (legal counsel for the family of Tyre Nichols)

“The family of Tyre Nichols is grateful that the Department of Justice heard their cries for accountability and are opening this investigation.

Actions such as this will continue to show that the federal government will not let corruption within police departments take the lives of innocent Americans.

It is our hope that the investigation by the DOJ, under the leadership of Attorney General Garland and Assistant Attorney General Clarke, will provide a transparent account of the abuses of power we have seen and continue to see in Memphis.”

Sen. Raumesh Akbari (D-Memphis)

“My hope is that city and police officials embrace the Department of Justice’s civil rights investigation as an opportunity for systemic change.

Our families are sick and tired of crime and they need our police department to succeed. But well-meaning officers cannot build trust if the department does not holistically address the failures it has made in the past.”

Former Shelby County Commissioner Tami Sawyer

“Let’s not forget that the last time DOJ investigated Memphis, it found that Black youth were treated unfairly in Juvenile Court, the detention center, and by MPD and SCSO. Mayors [Jim] Strickland and [then Shelby County Mayor Mark Lutrell] successfully lobbied the Trump administration to remove those DOJ monitors.”

Just City

“Just City is pleased and encouraged that the Department of Justice has answered our community’s call for a pattern or practice investigation into the city of Memphis and the Memphis Police Department. We proudly added our voice to those of lawmakers, pastors, and advocates leading this demand and provided data analysis as evidence of their claims.

Today’s announcement is evidence of the power of our collective efforts since the tragic killing of Tyre Nichols, but we are also grateful for those who have advocated for more accountability and transparency for years. The opening of this investigation is validation of a long-held understanding by many in our community that our police department is rooted in a culture of violence, racial discrimination, and resistance to accountability.

We hope that our city’s next mayor will take this evidence and investigation seriously and move toward creating meaningful accountability for police officers and enact plans to reduce the over-policing of Black communities. This is a pivotal opportunity, and we hope this investigation results in renewed trust and public safety in a community desperate for both.”

Democratic State House Minority Leader and Memphis mayoral candidate Rep. Karen Camper

“The announcement of the Department of Justice investigation into the patterns and practices of the Memphis Police Department brings us one step closer to putting an end to a culture of racism, violence and violation that has been systemic in the department.

This investigation is focused on what we know must be fixed right now, but I believe it will be a catalyst for reform so that we do not have to have to fix it again in the future.

The work to create a more just and equitable Memphis continues and I promise you that I will always be in the fight with you.”

Rev. Al Sharpton

“When I delivered the eulogy for Tyre [Nichols] this February, I made a clear call for the Justice Department to look at the policies and procedures that led to his death.

“You cannot allow a police department to continue business as usual when there’s clear video of multiple officers ripping him from his car, shoving him to the pavement, and senselessly beating him to death.”

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

New DOJ Office Targets Hate Crimes, Civil Rights Violations

Hate crimes, civil rights violations, and domestic terrorism are the focus of a new U.S. Department of Justice unit in Memphis.

On Monday, United States Attorney Kevin Ritz announced the creation of the new, permanent National Security and Civil Rights Unit. A supervising attorney and several prosecutors will “respond to and prevent hate crimes and civil rights violations, as well as threats to national security.”

“None of us can afford for federal investigators and prosecutors to take a passive role when it comes to protecting the rights guaranteed by the Constitution,” Ritz said in a statement. “We have a responsibility to our communities to be active participants in seeing those rights endure. 

“This new unit mobilizes every tool at our disposal to prosecuting hate-based crimes, civil rights violations, violent extremism, and related crimes. This is a major part of our mission and deserves to always have a clear, formal home in our office.”

Ritz picked Assistant United States Attorney Karen Hartridge to lead the unit. The team will expand quickly as leaders plan to hire multiple attorneys for it by the end of summer. 

The new unit falls in line with a directive from U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland from May 2021. Garland urged U.S. Attorneys like Ritz to “combat hate crimes and incidents, address them when they occur, support those victimized by them, and reduce the pernicious effects these incidents have on our society,” according to a statement.

FBI data show U.S. hate crimes rose from more than 8,000 in 2020 to nearly 11,000 the following year. 

Data from the Tennessee Bureau of Information (TBI) released earlier this year show hate crimes in the state have risen for the last three years. The latest available data show 133 hate crimes were recorded here in 2021, higher than the 122 recorded in 2020, and the 112 hate crimes recorded in 2019.

“Our first job is to send a strong message to the cities and counties we serve that we take these kinds of cases seriously and that we are focused on holding people accountable when there is a report of a violation of civil rights or threat to national security,” Hartridge said in a statement.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

DOJ Sues Methodist, West Clinic on Kickback Allegations

Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare (MLH) paid for unlawful kickbacks from the West Clinic for patient referrals, according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), but the Memphis companies say the allegations “mischaracterize” the relationship.  

The DOJ began investigating the claims in 2017, after Jeffrey H. Liebman, the former president of Methodist University Hospital, came forward as a whistleblower. He was joined in the whistleblower suit in 2019 by Dr. David M. Stern, M.D., who served in leadership roles at Methodist, West Clinic, and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC).

In 2012, Methodist announced a “partnership” between the healthcare system and West Clinic. At the time, Methodist lacked a comprehensive cancer treatment service. The deal would allow West’s patients to get treatment at Methodist-owned facilities.  

The news release issued at the time said it was not a “sale” but a “novel partnership.” The two were “joining forces with Methodist to create a comprehensive, fully integrated cancer service for the benefit of Mid-South residents.” But, the DOJ said, Methodist “purchased substantially all of [West’s] outpatient locations.” This deal allowed Methodist to get more Medicare reimbursements, or more payments from the federal government for caring for Medicare patients. 

At the same time, Methodist made a $7 million investment in ACORN Research, a business in which West and its medical director, Dr. Lee Schwartzberg, had a personal financial interest, the DOJ said. This gave the parties involved the mechanism to move the kickback funds during the seven years of the agreement. The payments were “expressly” for services that were supposed to be — but were not — provided in the agreement. 

The DOJ said the entire “sophisticated business integration” helped to disguise the “unlawful kickbacks.”  The department said, “Methodist knowingly agreed to pay West millions of dollars in kickbacks for the revenues Methodist expected to, and ultimately did, realize from West’s referrals.”

The agreement lasted from January 1st, 2012 through December 31st, 2018 and continued even after Methodist knew the allegations were being investigated by federal agencies.     

“Methodist knowingly agreed to pay West millions of dollars in kickbacks for the revenues Methodist expected to, and ultimately did, realize from West’s referrals.”

U.S. Department of Justice

“As a result of the transaction, Methodist, which prior to the deal had no outpatient cancer treatment, was able to establish a new stream of income in the reimbursements for outpatient treatment that previously went to West,” the DOJ said in a news release issued Tuesday. “Methodist also realized a huge increase in referrals for inpatient services from West, which previously referred the bulk of its patients to Methodist’s competitors, including Baptist Memorial Hospital.

“By purchasing West’s outpatient locations, Methodist was able to bill Medicare not only for the facility and professional components of outpatient treatment but also for the chemotherapy and other drugs provided, for which Methodist could recoup a staggering discount in costs through the 340B Discount Drug Program, resulting in $50 million in profits to Methodist in one year alone.”

But Methodist officials rebutted the allegations Tuesday. the deal structure was created by “respected outside experts” who said the agreement reflected fair market value for the services. It will fight the government’s “allegations in detail in the appropriate legal forum.”

A statement from Methodist said, “Our payments were appropriate, and MLH received the services due under affiliation agreements. The government’s belated decision to intervene in the suit two years after it declined to do so has changed nothing about the case.

“We are proud that our partnership with West succeeded in creating an integrated cancer diagnosis treatment and surgical service that not only improved cancer care, but provided care where it was needed most, reduced health disparities and led to better patient outcomes for the Memphis and Mid-South communities.”

The matter is being investigated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General.

Categories
News News Blog

U.S. Attorney’s Office Ups Efforts to Combat Sexual Harassment in Housing

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Tennessee is increasing its efforts to combat sexual harassment in housing as many struggle with housing insecurity amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

U.S. Attorney D. Michael Dunavant is asking that Tennesseans who have witnessed or experienced sexual harassment by a landlord, property manager, maintenance worker, or anyone with control over housing to report it to the Department of Justice.

This increased effort comes as the COVID-19 pandemic has caused many to experience housing insecurity and an inability to pay rent on time. The department is working with state and local partners to identify incidents of sexual harassment in housing and will investigate such allegations, pursuing enforcement actions where necessary.

“Every person in this district deserves the right to live in a place of their choosing without fear of sexual harassment,” Dunavant said. “This is not a small town issue or a big city issue, but an issue of respect and dignity. We want women and men throughout all of West Tennessee to know that there’s someone they can turn to if you feel unsafe in your home, no matter where their home is.

[pullquote-1]

The Fair Housing Act authorizes the Department of Justice to take “swift action” against anyone who sexually harasses tenants, Eric Dreiband, assistant attorney general for civil rights said.

“Landlords, property owners, and others who prey on vulnerable tenants during the COVID-19 pandemic should be on notice. We bring the full resources of the United States Department of Justice to the fight against sexual harassment in housing. We will defend the right of tenants and their families to live peacefully and securely in their homes without the added stress, pain, fear, and turmoil of dealing with sexual predators.”

This effort is a part of the Justice Department’s Sexual Harassment in Housing Initiative, which was launched in 2017. Since then, the initiative has brought lawsuits across the country, which has led to millions of dollars in damages to victims of harassment.

The department frequently uncovers harassment that has been ongoing for years, as many individuals do not know sexual harassment by a housing provider is a violation of federal law.

Anyone who has experienced or witnessed this type of harassment can report it to the justice department’s Civil Rights Division by calling 844-360-6178 or emailing fairhousing@usdoj.gov. Individuals can also call the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Tennessee at 901-544-4231.

Categories
News News Blog

Department of Justice to Monitor Election Day Voting

coverstory_vote-mag.jpg

Tomorrow, registered voters will have the chance to cast their ballots for the nation’s general election.
And to make sure everything goes smoothly, representatives of the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be monitoring polling locations in Shelby County.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Tennessee, DOJ personnel will monitor polling place activities to ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act and other federal voting rights statutes. And a Civil Rights Division attorney will coordinate federal activities and maintain contact with local election officials.

The Voting Rights Act prohibits racial discrimination during elections.

Voters can contact the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division to file complaints about discriminatory voting practices, including harassment or intimidation. The Voting Section can be reached at 1-800-253-3931.

Categories
Opinion

Man to Watch: U.S. Attorney Edward Stanton III

Edward-Stanton2.jpg

The sign-in pens in the United States attorney’s office in the federal building have real flowers on the end of them. How about that?

The significance? Zero. But you take your color wherever you can find it in the federal building. Down-to-earth, conversational and opinionated as they may be off the job, feds are invariably somewhat robot-like in public in their official capacity.

Edward Stanton III, the current United States attorney, is no exception. I stopped by recently to get acquainted and found the 40-year-old Stanton polite, professional, dedicated to justice, and, like seven of his predecessors I have known, as guarded as a bulldog with a ham bone when the topic is politics.

They pay their political dues to get appointed by the President on the recommendation of the senior members of Congress from their party (interim United States attorneys are an exception and usually career prosecutors). Then they are supposed to put politics aside when facing some tough calls about public corruption cases. West Tennessee District has a long record of high-profile cases like Tennessee Waltz and Tarnished Blue and Main Street Sweeper.

The process isn’t automatic, but if form holds, whether or not Stanton is in office in a year or so will depend on who wins the election in November. Stanton is a Democrat, appointed in 2010 by Barack Obama. His predecessor, David Kustoff, was a politically active Republican appointed by President George W. Bush. Stanton was a candidate for the Democratic nomination for Congress against Steve Cohen. His father is General Sessions Court Clerk Ed Stanton Jr. Ed III was a national advance team member for Clinton/Gore ‘96 in Washington, D.C., from July 1996 to November 1996. He has also worked as a corporate attorney for FedEx and in the office of Charles Carpenter, a political strategist for former Mayor Herenton.

“I want to be clear that what I do is not political,” he said. “The dictates of this job are very apolitical.”

In 2011, Stanton and officials from the Justice Department in Washington D.C. went to the National Civil Rights Museum to announce the formation of a new civil rights unit to be headed by veteran Memphis prosecutor Steve Parker. In August, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee approved a consent order in Fayette County, which the Department of Justice negotiated with the Board of Education and the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund to desegregate the Fayette County public schools.

It requires the district to implement a controlled choice program, close two schools, construct a new one, revise attendance zone lines, and monitor its schools to achieve a racial balance within 15 percent of the county at large.

“This consent order is a significant landmark in this desegregation case, which dates back to 1965,” Stanton had said in a prepared statement that made me wonder if the Justice Department plans to become more involved in school desegregation in Memphis and Shelby County.

“At this point the Department of Justice is not a party to that,” he told me. “We were a party early on and the litigants agreed to dismiss the Department of Justice.”

He said there is little connection between the Fayette County and Shelby County schools cases.

“Certainly, we are interested in seeing that federal laws are upheld across the board, not only in Shelby County and Fayette County but across this district in all aspects,” he said.

As for the Shelby County cases scheduled to start this week and in November in the courtroom of U.S. District Judge Samuel H. Mays, “We stay apprised of the developments, that’s for sure.”

He has a personal interest, too. Stanton grew up in Memphis and attended Idlewild Elementary School, Bellevue Junior High, Central High School. He got his college undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Memphis.

His priorities, he said, are domestic and international terrorism, “worst of the worst” gun crime, a teaching certification scam, the Safe Street Task Force, Project Safe Neighborhoods, Internet crime, social media predators, and human trafficing, which has spiked in Memphis as a distribution center for all kinds of things. A defendant nicknamed “T-Rex” is scheduled to go on trial later this year.

With no ammo of my own to fire at Stanton, I tried baiting him with a week-old quote from Eliot Spitzer, the former New York governor, state prosecutor, and television commentator long since freed from the bonds of circumspection.

“They are meek and weak-kneed when it comes to the big institutions, and then they pick out these almost insignificant cases as if to prove they’re tough,” Spitzer said, talking about the Justice Department and Goldman Sachs.

Stanton smiled and declined to take the bait.

“Our work in the Western District speaks for itself in this department, as well as the Department of Justice,” he said. “That doesn’t have anything to do with what I am doing now as a federal law enforcement official in West Tennessee.”