Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Court Dismisses Friends of George’s Lawsuit

A lawsuit that halted Tennessee’s restriction on drag shows and related entertainment has been dismissed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Friends of George’s, Inc. v. Mulroy challenged Tennessee’s Adult Entertainment Act, and was filed in 2023 in hopes of challenging the law, claiming violations of the group’s First Amendment rights. The LGBTQ+ theater company at the Evergreen Theatre referred to the act as the “reckless anti-drag law.” The law was temporarily blocked shortly after, as it was set to go into effect on April 1st.

The district courts originally ruled that Tennessee’s Adult Entertainment Act was unconstitutional; however, the Sixth Circuit Court dismissed the case, saying that Friends of George’s did not prove how they would be harmed by the enforcement of this act.

U.S. District Judge Thomas Parker initially granted a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against District Attorney Steve Mulroy, the state of Tennessee, Governor Bill Lee, and Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti.

Adult cabaret performances, as described by the law, are those that feature “topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, and male or female impersonators.” It also stated that these performances were “harmful to minors.” The law made “adult cabaret performances” on public property or “in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult” a criminal offense.

The Tennessee General Assembly defined “harmful to minors” as “that quality of any description or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual excitement, sexual conduct, excess violence, or sadomasochistic abuse when the matter or performance would be found by the average person applying contemporary community standards to appeal predominantly to the prurient, shameful or morbid interests of minors.”

Friends of George’s allies took to their social media accounts following the ruling, saying they were devastated by the court’s decision, and they are consulting with their attorney for “next steps” as they prepare for their next production on August 2nd.

“Instead of addressing the constitutionality of Tennessee’s drag ban, today’s ruling has left us and thousands of others in the LGBTQ+ community dangerously in limbo, with no clear answers as to how this ban will be enforced and by whom,” they said. “The only thing that is clear about this law is that it’s firmly rooted in hate and defies the will of the majority of Tennesseans.”

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti applauded the court’s decision to throw the suit out, and stated they “focused on what the law actually says,” and that the Adult Entertainment Act has been “consistently misinterpreted.”

“As a state overflowing with world-class artists and musicians, Tennessee respects the right to free expression,” Skrmetti said in a statement. “But as the Court noted, Tennessee’s ‘harmful to minors’ standard is constitutionally sound and Tennessee can absolutely prohibit the exhibition of obscene material to children.”

Categories
News News Blog

Federal Judge Rules Tennessee Drag Ban as Unconstitutional

U.S. District Judge Thomas Parker has ruled that the Tennessee law that bans “adult cabaret performances” is unconstitutional.

In March, Friends of George’s, an LGBTQ theater company at the Evergreen Theatre, filed a suit against the state of Tennessee regarding what they called the “reckless anti-drag law.” The law was temporarily blocked shortly after, as it was set to go into effect on April 1st.

Parker granted a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against District Attorney Steve Mulroy, the state of Tennessee, Governor Bill Lee, and Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti.

The Friends of George’s suit stated the law violated the group’s First Amendment rights and argued the statute is unconstitutional.

“After considering the briefs and evidence presented at trial, the Court finds that — despite Tennessee’s compelling interest in protecting the psychological and physical wellbeing of children — the Adult Entertainment Act (“AEA”) is an unconstitutional restriction on the freedom of speech and permanently enjoins Defendant Steven Mulroy from enforcing the unconstitutional statute,” said court documents.

The court stated that not only is the AEA “unconstitutionally vague” but is “substantially overbroad,” specifically in its language regarding what is “harmful to minors.”

The law defined adult cabaret performances as those that feature “topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, and male or female impersonators.” It also stated that these performances were “harmful to minors.” The law made “adult cabaret performances” on public property or “in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult” a criminal offense.

The Tennessee General Assembly defined “harmful to minors” as “that quality of any description or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual excitement, sexual conduct, excess violence, or sadomasochistic abuse when the matter or performance would be found by the average person applying contemporary community standards to appeal predominantly to the prurient, shameful or morbid interests of minors.”

“The AEA’s ‘harmful to minors’ standard applies to minors of all ages so it fails to provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or ‘anywhere’ a minor could be present,” said the ruling.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Tennessee Drag Law Blocked By Federal Judge

Tennessee’s “anti-drag” law has temporarily been blocked by a federal judge. The law was set to go into effect on April 1st.

The judge sided with Memphis-based theater group, Friends of George’s, who filed the lawsuit against Shelby County District Attorney, Steve Mulroy. The Friends of George’s suit stated that the law violated the group’s First Amendment rights, and argued that the statute is unconstitutional.

“A drag queen wearing a mini-skirt and a cropped top and dancing in front of children violates this statute, but a Tennessee Titans cheerleader wearing precisely the same outfit doing precisely the same routine does not, because she is not a ‘female impersonator,” said the complaint. “The prohibited speech is defined by the identity of the drag performer – and the message he conveys. That is a content-based restriction of speech protected by the First Amendment.”

While the law does not explicitly say “drag performers,” it defines adult cabaret performances as those that feature “ topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, and male or female impersonators. The law makes “adult cabaret performances” on public property or “in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult,” a criminal offense.  

U. S. District Judge Thomas L. Parker granted a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against Mulroy, the state of Tennessee, Governor Bill Lee, and Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti. The order is good for 14 days from March 31st, 2023. 

“If Tennessee wishes to exercise its police power in restricting speech it considers obscene it must do so within the constraints and framework of the United States Constitution.,” said Parker in the order. “The Court finds that, as it stands the record here suggests that when the legislature passed this Statute, it missed the mark.”

Friends of George’s argued that the language is too broad, and the court agreed.

“What exactly is a location on public property or a location where adult cabaret entertainment could be viewed by a person who is not an adult,” said Parker in the document. “Does a citizen’s private residence count? How about a camping ground at a national park? What if a minor browsing the worldwide web from a public library views an ‘adult cabaret performance’? Ultimately the Statute’s broad language clashes with the First Amendment’s tight constraints.”

According to a statement from Friends of George’s, they are set to return to court before their next  production on April 14th.

“We won because this is a bad law,” said Mark Campbell, president of the board of directors for Friends of George’s. “We look forward to our day in court, where the rights for all Tennesseans will be affirmed.”