Categories
News News Feature

7 Tips to Pay Yourself in Retirement

For most soon-to-be retirees, the idea of no longer receiving a paycheck and relying on savings and retirement income to make ends meet is scary. With proper planning and strategy, you can create your own retirement “paycheck” using various sources of retirement income. The following tips can help you get started.

1. Understand your current financial situation.

The first step in establishing a retirement paycheck is to gain a full understanding of your current financial situation, including your savings, investments, potential Social Security benefits, pension benefits, and any additional sources of income you expect to receive during retirement.

2. Estimate your monthly expenses.

Once you understand your current financial situation, the next step is to determine how much you’ll need to spend each month based on your desired retirement lifestyle. This will include your required monthly expenses like the cost of housing, healthcare, transportation, food, etc. Additionally, you’ll want to include discretionary spending (“the fun stuff”), such as travel, entertainment, and hobbies. You should also consider if there are any large purchases you hope to make in retirement, such as a second home, a boat, new cars, big trips, gifting to family members, etc.

3. Identify any potential income gaps.

Compare your expected retirement income sources to your estimated expenses. Do you have enough to pay for your desired lifestyle? If not, you’ll need to review your monthly spending expectations, focusing on the amount, timing, and/or frequency of your discretionary spending and big-ticket purchases. Alternatively, identify additional sources of retirement income (e.g. part-time work) to bridge the gap.

4. Implement a strategic withdrawal strategy.

A tax-efficient, strategic withdrawal strategy can provide a steady stream of monthly income and help ensure you don’t outlive your assets. If you have retirement accounts with different tax characteristics (taxable, tax-deferred, tax-exempt, etc.), you’ll likely have flexibility to minimize your tax obligations while optimizing your monthly income.

The benefit of following a disciplined withdrawal strategy is that you can monitor your ongoing expenditures, making changes as needed to ensure you don’t spend more than you can afford in any given year. This practice can help you maintain adequate assets to last a lifetime, regardless of market volatility.

5. Maintain an emergency fund.

Once you retire and say goodbye to your earned income stream, the first priority is to fund and maintain an emergency fund for unexpected expenses. This fund should be prioritized above all other savings and helps ensure you don’t need to dip into retirement savings or sell investments at inopportune times to pay for unforeseen expenses.

6. Plan for healthcare and long-term care expenses.

We can all count on healthcare expenses at some point in our lives. It’s imperative to have a plan to cover the possibility of increased healthcare needs in retirement. While there are many ways to account for these expenses, retirees should consider supplemental health insurance, use of tax advantaged health savings accounts (pre-retirement), and whether long-term care insurance is appropriate to help protect their retirement savings from unexpected medical expenses.

7. Incorporate Social Security planning.

It’s important to carefully consider the timing of your Social Security benefits in order to maximize the amount you’ll receive over your lifetime. Filing for benefits early means you’ll start receiving payments earlier but at a reduced monthly amount. On the other hand, delaying until age 70 to begin taking benefits means you’ll receive an increased monthly payment, growing at 8 percent per year following your full retirement age through age 70.

You and your wealth manager can determine a Social Security timing strategy that makes sense given your personal financial situation, benefit options, and retirement goals.

Gene Gard, CFA, CFP, CFT-I, is a Partner and Private Wealth Manager with Creative Planning. Creative Planning is one of the nation’s largest Registered Investment Advisory firms providing comprehensive wealth management services to ensure all elements of a client’s financial life are working together, including investments, taxes, estate planning, and risk management. For more information or to request a free, no-obligation consultation, visit CreativePlanning.com.

Categories
News News Feature

The Amazon Challenge

One of my favorite financial writers, Jacob Lund Fisker, had an interesting process to determine what sort of things to own. He was on the early crest of what we might now call minimalism (though he disputes that characterization) and even today focuses on owning things he uses hourly or at least daily. He has particular contempt for things owned more than six months without being used (get rid of it), things idle for more than a year (get rid of it!), and my favorite category, “I didn’t even know I owned this” (he recommends “get rid of it!!!” with three exclamation points).

I noticed recently that amazon.com order history is very detailed, can be easily extracted, and never is purged. There is nothing special about Amazon orders, or online vs. in-person buying in general, except it is rare to have such comprehensive buying info all in one place. I have Amazon purchases I can review going back to the year 2000 — a unique time capsule. Just like the addresses in my Amazon address book, it is a diary of my life and where I have been over the years. Here are some thoughts on what I see in my data from a financial perspective.

One large category is consumables like food and furnace filters, which mostly can be ignored. However, I have learned that it’s worth checking the price at local grocery stores since sometimes the cost of shipping baked in can have a big impact on the final price.

I wish I had all the money back that I spent on DVDs and CDs, since they have no place in my life anymore. I also wish I had the money back that I spent on most books — I love reading, but I could have borrowed most of these from a library (you can get anything via interlibrary loan!). Afterward, I could have bought only the ones that proved meaningful to me, as the vast majority sit idle or have been donated over the years.

One of the most satisfying categories is DIY supplies (sometimes expensive) that solved important problems and saved significant money, like a new starter for my 1999 Accord or a new faucet cartridge that saved a visit from the plumber.

My favorite category, just like Fisker, is things bought years ago and still used frequently, like the flip-flops I see sitting in the corner I bought in 2013 or my wife’s sunglasses from 2014 she still wears daily. Things in this category are shockingly few and far between. I’m actually going through the thousands of things I have bought to see how many are still in service by vintage year. Maybe we’ll have a follow-up article with some of that data — I’d like to learn how to buy more of this stuff and less of everything else.

A sad category includes the things used once or even never. Usually these are very specialized solutions that either did not work or proved to be too unrealistic or cumbersome. Sometimes they are simply impulse purchases that probably would never have been ordered if I forced myself to keep them in the cart for a week.

Even worse, there are problems that could have been solved with items on hand. For example, I have approximately a zillion HDMI cables at the bottom of a tangled bin somewhere, but I’ve continued to buy them over the years because it’s easier than tracking one down. This is probably an example of one of the worst aspects of consumerism.

My Amazon safari was eye-opening, and everyone’s experience is likely to be different. All spending decisions are based on trade-offs — spending vs. saving, time vs. money, money vs. emotions, consumption vs. conservation, and so on. Seeing the good purchases I have made was rewarding and seeing the countless purchases I have no use for today — or maybe never did — will hopefully help guide me in the right spending direction going forward.

You should take a look yourself if you use Amazon frequently — you too might find it a fun journey down memory lane as well as a sobering reflection of your own financial history!

Gene Gard is Chief Investment Officer at Telarray, a Memphis-based wealth management firm that helps families navigate investment, tax, estate, and retirement decisions. Ask him your questions or schedule an objective, no-pressure portfolio review at letstalk@telarrayadvisors.com. Sign up for the next free online seminar on the Events tab at telarrayadvisors.com.

Categories
News News Feature

Investing in Uncertainty

As part of the Observatory (our financial planning process), our investors unsurprisingly end up with, well, investments. These allocations are based on client need, desire, and ability to take risk, and the allocations tend to not frequently change over time. A client’s portfolio here is not based on an assumption of all sunshine and rainbows, but rather a review of history, including market declines in March of 2020, 2008, 2000, 1987, and even more obscure disturbances like the events of 1997 and 1937.

In our Observatory process, we don’t model any sort of attempt to predict or avoid these events. Instead, we model a disciplined approach of staying invested and taking opportunities to rebalance into equity markets after drawdowns. This approach has worked well in the past, and our view is that it will continue to work in the future. Nevertheless, there’s a fundamental human desire to avoid risk at all costs, especially when things seem particularly risky, and there are always a few clients eager to “get defensive until the uncertainty subsides” in every market environment.

For our investors, we believe we preemptively position defensively through allocations to short- and intermediate-term bonds. Those bonds aren’t there for the good times — in fact, they are a drag on performance when stock markets are strong. Bonds shine after a serious stock market downturn when they possibly contribute some total return. More importantly, they serve as a source of cash to rebalance into equities (just when equities have declined and become more attractively priced). We believe selling stocks and adding to bond allocations or going to all cash after a big market decline is the worst time to do so.

I was listening to the radio recently, and the host asked a guest, “… but what’s the point of economic modeling at a time of such great uncertainty as this?” I couldn’t help but laugh out loud. The host was referring to the Ukraine invasion, and he seemed to be implying that a forecast made the day before Russia invaded would be much more appropriate than one made the day after since so much “uncertainty” would be introduced by the conflict. I laughed because all forecasts are equally based on ex ante information and therefore don’t incorporate the unknowable future. Forecasts made confidently when things seem certain are likely the worst forecasts of all! The situation in Ukraine has become more certain today than at any time in the last decade or so. The greatest unknown — the question of whether Russia would dare a full-scale invasion of Ukraine — is uncertain no longer.

Stepping back, when in the past was there not uncertainty? Markets have performed exceptionally well for many decades, but we know that only because of the prescience of hindsight. Following the 2008 financial crisis, the U.S. stock market bottomed out quickly in March of 2009 and has provided extremely attractive returns ever since, but we sure didn’t know that was going to happen back then. There were concerns that banks would fail, cash would stop coming out of ATMs, and life as we know it would grind to a halt. The last decade was an exceptional one for investors, but who could have credibly predicted that in 2010?

As Yogi Berra said, it’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future. We are certain that the future will contain some difficult times, and that’s okay. If we devote all our efforts to avoiding the bad times, we’ll miss the good times too. If history is any guide, the good times will continue to be good enough to offset the bad in the years and decades to come — but only if you stay invested.

Gene Gard CFA, CFP, CFT-I, is Chief Investment Officer at Telarray, a Memphis-based wealth management firm that helps families navigate investment, tax, estate, and retirement decisions. Ask him your question at ggard@telarrayadvisors.com or sign up for the next free online seminar on the Events tab at telarrayadvisors.com.

Categories
News News Blog

State: Grocery, Furniture Sales Up, Retail and Restaurant Sales Down

Kroger.com

Kroger

In Tennessee, sales of building materials and groceries were up last month while retailers, restaurants, and bars continued to see declines.

In all, though, Tennessee tax revenues in August were higher than they were a year ago, buoyed by federal stimulus funds, according to to Tennessee Finance and Administration Commissioner Butch Eley. August revenues were $1.2 billion, he said. The figure is up $22 million over August 2019 and $115.1 million more than budget estimates.

“Consumer activity for the month of July, reflected in August’s sales tax receipts, continued to outperform expectations as federal stimulus resources remained a large part of the state’s strong performance,” Eley said in a statement. “While tax receipts from building material suppliers, food stores, furniture, and home appliance retailers have increased significantly compared to last year, apparel stores, many small retailers, restaurants, and bars continue to experience losses due to decreased sales activity.”

August marked the first month of the state’s new fiscal year. Eley said his office will “remain cautiously optimistic” but will “continue to monitor economic activity and revenue trends to ensure fiscal stability.”

Here are some other points of interest from the August report:

• General fund revenues were $108.6 million more than the August estimate. The four other funds that share in state tax revenues were $6.5 million more than the estimates.

• Sales tax revenues were $103 million more than the estimate for August. The August growth rate was 3.83 percent.

• Gasoline and motor fuel revenues decreased by 7.75 percent from August of 2019 and were $2.3 million less than the budgeted estimate of $103.4 million.

• Business tax revenues were $1 million less than the August estimate of $9 million.

• Tobacco tax revenues for the month were less than budgeted estimates by $1 million.

• Motor vehicle registration revenues were $4 million more than the August estimate of $26.4 million.

Categories
Opinion

Get Wise: Monetize

Ethics codes are so yesterday. Tennessee Waltz, Main Street Sweeper, Tarnished Blue, Tarnished News, and “Same Game Different Name” have thrown politicians, cops, and journalists into a hopeless state of confusion.

Ethics shmethics. What they need is a fee schedule to help them fairly and honestly value their services in today’s ever-changing marketplace.

Well, Mr. Monetize is here at your service.

Dear Mr. Monetize: What would Kant say about all of this?

Immanuel Kant, a founding member of the Memphis City Council, is famous for his “categorical imperative,” which reads in part: “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.”

Because of the confusing structure and irregular syntax of this sentence, it was later amended by ordinance on a unanimous vote to read: “Do what you can get away with as long as you can point to somebody else who had an even better deal.”

Dear Mr. Monetize: I’m an elected official who’s bad at math. How many ways can I monetize?

A bunch. There are 13 City Council members and 13 county commissioners plus 14 city and county school board members. Like Kant said back in the day, each one of you is a potential independent contractor or consultant-to-the-max under universal law. Multiply all those numbers and the result is a really big number.

Dear Mr. Monetize: So how much should I charge for services?

It depends on the nature of the service, the timing, and the size of your cojones. But these guidelines should be useful. Prices are subject to change without notice, and holiday discounts may or may not apply. Coupons may not be used in some situations.

Consulting: The sky’s the limit! A monthly retainer of $5,000 is entirely appropriate. On an annual basis, $100,000 and up is more like it. The “contingency fee” or “finder’s fee” of one-half of 1 percent may yield a better return if the contract is large and the client is generous, stupid, or desperate. Step one is to print some business cards that list your occupation as “consultant.”

Setting up a meeting: A fee of $20,000 is standard, plus the cost of food, drinks, and napkins if required. (A mark-up should not be charged on those items, however.) For a simple office meeting, a fee of $1,000 for the first consultation is reasonable and customary.

Phone call to mayor: $100, plus carrier charges.

Phone call to cuss out reporter: $500, plus carrier charges. The fee must be returned if the reporter bites back.

Phone call to constituent: no charge. But remember: leads, leads, leads!

Phone call to assistant U.S. attorney Tim DiScenza: oops! Wrong number.

Personal visit to member of quasi-public board with power to dispense monies in excess of $10 million: $750 per visit. If provider is a member of board, fees are tripled.

Sucking up to mayor: job paying at least $80,000 a year plus pension benefits.

Insulting or cussing out mayor: $50 per television interview, with an additional $50 each time the clip airs. Get residuals!

Dear Mr. Monetize: I’m a cop who knows some bad shit that went down in the department. What should I do?

Get in line.

Dear Mr. Monetize: I am a print journalist. Recent actions of the City Council, the County Commission, and federal prosecutors regarding so-called strip clubs have caused a certain amount of shrinkage, if you know what I mean, in our publication, which used to feature full-page pictures of sexy young women with huge monetizers. What can I do?

You could start with that picture at the top of this page.

Categories
News

Tough Week for Millionaire Preachers

Republican Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa sent letters to six media
mogul preachers Monday asking for documentation detailing their
finances. The Senate Finance Committee targeted televangelists
including the wonderfully named Creflo Dollar, Joyce Meyer, Benny
Hinn, Eddie Long, Kenneth and Gloria Copeland, and Randy and Paula
White.

The committee says that those evangelists should spend donors’
money “as intended, and in adherence with the tax code.” The implication
being that these preachers offer donors a range of services from healing
to spiritual salvation and returned financial prosperity in exchange for
their offerings without necessarily mentioning the private jets, Rolls
Royces, and Manhattan condos these preachers sport thanks to their
earnings.

This is a particularly timely development considering this week’s Flyer cover story focusing on the money and power within the Memphis-based
Church of God in Christ, Inc. (COGIC).

Though none of the preachers
currently under Senate investigation are affiliated with COGIC, the
denomination’s most prominent leader, the late presiding bishop G.E.
Patterson built a global media ministry worth millions. Patterson’s
successor, for now at least, is Charles E. Blake, pastor of the “church of
the stars” at West Angeles COGIC in Los Angeles, California. Blake pays
himself a salary that nears a million dollars to the chagrin of one former
member who asks, “what pastor needs to be paying himself almost a
million-dollar salary, living in a mansion in Beverly Hills off the tithes
and offerings of a congregation from one of the low-income areas of Los
Angeles? The money he makes could be going back into the community.”

Meanwhile, in the wake of the Flyer‘s story, we’re told that Blake’s wife has gone
to great lengths to defame us, reportedly referring to our humble
publication as a rag.

Well, amen to that.

Categories
Cover Feature News

Debt Trap

“I work all night, I work all day, to pay the bills I have to pay / Ain’t it sad / And still there never seems to be a single penny left for me / That’s too bad.” — ABBA

Leaning back against the glass window at a Starbucks in Cordova, Leigh blends in with the crowd. She has the sweet, maternal appearance of a soccer mom. One might pass her at the grocery store and assume she lives the American Dream with a couple of kids, a well-paid husband, a swimming pool, and a golden retriever in the backyard.

But in reality, Leigh (who asked the Flyer not to reveal her real name) isn’t swimming in crystal-clear, chlorine-sanitized pool water. She’s swimming in a sea of debt.

After divorcing her husband four years ago, Leigh was stuck paying off most of the couple’s debt on her own, since their credit cards were in her name.

“When we separated, he paid for some of them, but when [the divorce] was official, he said, ‘They’re yours again,'” says Leigh. “We didn’t argue in court because we don’t have any children, so I got stuck with the credit-card bills. I can’t prove that my husband used them.”

At first, it didn’t seem so unmanageable. She was paying on the bills every month. She managed to pay off her car, an eight-year-old Dodge Neon. But she was saving the large bills for last, and on her salary, she wasn’t able to pay rent, utilities, living expenses, school-loan payments, and the credit-card companies. So she focused on keeping a roof over her head, meaning some credit-card companies didn’t get paid. That’s when the calls started coming.

“One company didn’t even contact me,” says Leigh. “A sheriff just showed up at my door at 7:30 in the morning with a summons to court. They said they were suing. I didn’t even realize that debt was still out there.”

After being constantly harassed by credit-card companies, Leigh decided she’d look into filing bankruptcy. Unfortunately for her, that decision came about a year too late. She finally called an attorney a few weeks before October 17th, the one-year anniversary of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. She learned that, due to a new provision in the act, it would be difficult and costly for her to obtain relief under Chapter 7, the type of bankruptcy in which the debtors liquidate all their assets and forgo further monthly payments.

Though the act was passed in an attempt to cut back on what Congress considered abuse of bankruptcy filings, judges, attorneys, and trustees say the act has done more to affect filings by the working poor than by high-rolling CEOs.

Here in Memphis, once labeled the bankruptcy capital of the nation, filings dropped precipitously after the act went into effect last October. Though the number of filings has risen steadily since, filings are still about half what they once were. In September 2004, there were 2,189 bankruptcy cases filed in Memphis. In September 2005, 2,811 cases were filed. In September 2006, only 1,297 cases were filed.

The consensus among local bankruptcy officials is that the act didn’t fix the underlying problems that cause bankruptcy. It just made the process more burdensome and costly.


Robbing Peter, Paying Paul

After paying her rent, utilities, and living expenses, Leigh only has about $32 a month left over. That isn’t nearly enough to make the required monthly payments in a Chapter 13 plan, which allows the debtor to pay off bills under a court-approved repayment plan rather than by surrendering personal property.

But due to a new provision in the 2005 bill, Leigh doesn’t qualify for Chapter 7 either. She failed the means test or, as debtor’s attorney Tom Fila calls it, the “mean test.” The new statutory test uses a mathematical formula to compare one’s income and living expenses with the state median income of $34,151. Using those numbers, people who make a certain amount higher than the state median are forced to file Chapter 13 instead of Chapter 7 if they want relief under the bankruptcy code.

“They look at your gross income, not what you actually bring home after taxes,” says Leigh. “I try to do everything right. I work and try to pay bills. I don’t have much. I drive an eight-year-old car that breaks down all the time.”

If Leigh were jobless, she’d be able to file Chapter 7, but since she’s stuck somewhere in the middle, she’s being forced into Chapter 13. The bill was designed to crack down on abusive filers, yet people like Leigh are the ones getting the short end of the stick.

Abusive filings are actually pretty rare in Memphis. Local bankruptcy trustee George Stevenson, who handles payment in all Chapter 13 cases filed in Memphis, says he’s only seen a handful of abusive cases in the 24 years he’s served at the bankruptcy court.

“I’ve participated in three criminal trials [regarding abuse],” says Stevenson. “We’ve referred more cases to the justice system, but they never went to trial, so apparently they didn’t rise to the level of crimes.”

After a multimillion-dollar lobbying campaign by the credit industry, the new bankruptcy act was passed, with 70 percent of Congress voting for it. Among those voting “yes” was 9th District representative Harold Ford Jr.

The new bankruptcy act is 500 pages long and, according to several bankruptcy officials, difficult to decipher.

“Unmistakably, the creditor-friendly 2005 bankruptcy act … is not a model of clarity,” says David S. Kennedy, chief U.S. bankruptcy judge for the Western District of Tennessee. “There’s little underlying legislative history to provide the judiciary with much guidance regarding congressional intent.”

The new law made numerous changes to the old bankruptcy system, but in a nutshell, it does the following: increases filing and attorney fees, requires more paperwork, requires filers to pay for and attend credit-counseling services, and establishes the aforementioned means test, which makes filing Chapter 7 more difficult.

Justin Fox Burks

Bankruptcy Central: 200 Jefferson in downtown Memphis

Though Leigh’s situation is common in much of the country, it’s not so common in Memphis, where the majority of those wishing to file Chapter 7 fall well below the state median income.

“Usually, everyone who does the means test has a lower income,” says Jack Hogan with the local Consumer Credit Counseling office. “[The new law] is in place to collect some of the high-end bankruptcies, which, of course, in Memphis we don’t really see. It’s mainly the average Joe filing here.”

But no matter what kind of bankruptcy the average Joe chooses to file, the cost of filing is affecting everyone. Filing fees have gone up and so have attorney’s fees. Since the paperwork is more difficult now, it’s nearly impossible to file without an attorney’s expertise.

“There’s no doubt bankruptcy is more expensive than it was before,” says Kennedy. “Lawyers are required to prepare more documents. There’s a lot more due diligence. But a lot of folks can’t afford to hire a lawyer, and they’re too unsophisticated to represent themselves. There’s so many more legal hoops to jump through.”

According to attorney Ben Sissman, who represents both creditors and debtors, his attorney fees rose from $800 to $900 before October 17, 2005, to around $1,375 now.

And debtors must now attend credit-counseling services — before filing and prior to being discharged from their bankruptcy. Though they can be waived in certain circumstances, there is a charge for both classes.

“Some of the information they’re getting from credit counseling is beneficial, but sometimes it’s inane stuff,” says Fila. “They’re telling people to get more money, get a better-paying job. Thanks a lot, genius. If only I would have thought of that myself.”

Fila says there’s a misconception that people filing bankruptcy don’t know how to manage their money.

Tom Fila

“It’s easy to manage your money when you have money. But when your utility bill comes in and you don’t have the money and you’ve got four kids and the car payment’s due next month, you’ve got to start juggling,” says Fila. “They’re robbing Peter to pay Paul, yet they keep their lights on. The kids get fed. They’ve stretched the dollar so thin the thing is squealing. They should be teaching classes on managing money.”

No Ken Lays Here

Ramona Burrow, a red-headed woman who appears to be in her mid-to-late 40s, raises her right hand and takes an oath to tell the whole truth, then sits in a cushioned chair facing Chapter 13 trustee staff attorney Chantele McIntyre.

Burrow and her attorney are at the Meeting of Creditors, a mandatory meeting where Chapter 13 debtors and their attorneys go over their repayment plans with the trustee’s staff. At least 50 debtors are gathered today, occupying several rows of chairs at the back of the room.

They’re white, black, young, old, dressed up, dressed down. The crowd could easily be the same people one might see dining at IHOP after church on Sunday. Each debtor waits patiently for his or her name to be called, at which time they’ll sit across from McIntyre and go over their individual repayment plans.

Burrow sits quietly while McIntyre goes over her plan, listing how much she’s required to pay on each debt she owes. After reviewing the plan, McIntyre shoots off a number of questions so quickly she could be mistaken for an auctioneer:

“Did you list everybody you owe?”

“Do you own a home? Whose name is on the deed?”

“Do you have a car in your name?”

“Do you have any lawsuits pending?”

“Do you have a right to sue anybody?”

“Do you have child support or alimony?”

After answering “no” to most of the above questions, Burrow reveals that she’s a full-time college student. Her husband brings home $1,950 a month. The whole process takes less than 10 minutes, and Burrow leaves with a repayment plan established in her Chapter 13 case.

Thanks to the new bill, this room hasn’t been quite as full this year as it has been in years past. But the number of filers is inching back up. In fact, since fewer people are able to file Chapter 7 now, more and more people are finding themselves at the Chapter 13 Meeting of Creditors.

In the first nine months of 2005, before the bankruptcy bill was signed into law, 63 percent of Memphis bankruptcy cases were filed as Chapter 13. In the first nine months of this year, 79 percent of the cases filed were Chapter 13.

From January to September 2005, 20,291 cases were filed in both Chapter 7 and 13. Compare that with 10,338 from January to September of this year.

Numbers dropped dramatically after October 17, 2005. In Memphis, over 500 cases were filed on October 16, 2005, and over 1,000 were filed on October 14th. That was up from the average of 50 cases on a normal day.

“October 17th was kind of a watershed day. After that, [filing] dropped dramatically,” says Fila. “A lady came and told me she didn’t even know she could still file. She thought George Bush had canceled bankruptcy. The media made it out as ‘You need to file now or you’re not going to have the opportunity.’ So everybody and their mother filed right before October 17th. Now the numbers are going right back up.”

Though the new bill may be weeding out a few people who have simply charged too much on their credit cards, many Memphians are filing for more serious reasons.

“Historically, people file here because they’ve lost their job or they’ve gotten divorced or they’ve gotten hurt and can’t pay their medical bills,” says Jennie Latta, U.S. bankruptcy judge for the Western District of Tennessee. “And all those problems can go hand in hand. When you’ve got money troubles, that often leads to domestic troubles. Or domestic troubles can distract you and make you a less effective worker.”

Latta says these typically aren’t people unwilling to work. They’re people who are out there trying to find good jobs, but when life comes at them hard, they fall. That’s when they end up in bankruptcy court.

George Stevenson

“Bankruptcy spans race, gender, and age. Black folks are filing. White folks are filing. Poor, young, old,” says Fila. “The only thing that matters here is the color of money. Either you have it or you don’t.”

One of the biggest factors contributing to filings in Memphis is the large number of people working temporary jobs.

“When I started serving as a bankruptcy trustee in 1982, there were two temporary-job services in Memphis,” says Stevenson. “If you look in the Yellow Pages now, you’ll see about 200 temporary-job sources. People can find jobs for a little while, and those jobs end and they’re out of work.”

Sissman tells a story about a woman who worked at the local Cleo Wrap factory, which only offers warehouse employees eight to nine months of work annually. Last winter, the woman was let go a month early due to a lack of work. She was asked to come back a month later than usual the following spring. Those two months were enough to set her back, landing her in bankruptcy court.

“We have a lot of people working very hard in permanent part-time jobs,” says Sissman. “The people who wrote this bill have never met anyone like that. They have no clue that everybody who lives in America doesn’t have an accountant and a bookkeeper and all the stuff people in government take for granted because they can afford whatever they want.”

It doesn’t hurt that the stigma attached to filing bankruptcy has waned over the years.

“Some of the stigma has gone away because people see the movie stars and politicians filing,” says Fila. “But people still hate doing it. They’d rather be anywhere else than sitting across from me. They cry. They’re upset. They’re glad to get relief, but nobody’s happy about coming in here.”

Deep Roots

Chapter 13 has deep roots in Memphis. It was created in 1938 by Walter Chandler, a former U.S. representative and former mayor of Memphis (also the father of former Mayor Wyeth Chandler).

Chapter 13 is generally favored by credit-card companies, auto lenders, and other creditors because the repayment plan ensures they’re getting at least some of their money back. That’s unlike Chapter 7, in which creditors are only paid by assets the debtor is able to sell off. When assets run out in Chapter 7, the remaining debts are usually discharged.

The new bill was designed to push more people into filing Chapter 13, yet the majority of filings in Memphis were Chapter 13 anyway.

“The new bill really had much less of an effect on Memphis than it did the rest of the country,” says Stevenson. “It wasn’t like, ‘You’re doing things wrong in Memphis. We want to change you.’ It was, ‘You’re doing things wrong in other parts of the country. We want you to do it more like it’s done in Memphis.'”

Yet the bill still makes it more difficult for those filing Chapter 13. Not only is the process more costly for Chapter 13 debtors, the bill attempts to cut back on serial filings by making it harder to get an automatic stay after re-filing. An automatic stay is legal jargon for a hold put into place after a person files, making it illegal for creditors to harass debtors for payment.

The Early Bird Gets Good Credit

It’s 8 a.m. on a summer Saturday, yet about 35 kids, mostly junior high or high school students, are piled into a North Memphis police substation for a little Finances 101.

The station is hosting a financial-planning workshop for teens. Managing credit isn’t taught in city schools, so officers have invited a couple of bankers, an automobile finance manager, and an apartment manager to speak to the kids about how to manage their money.

“Are you already getting credit-card applications in the mail?” asks Brenda Harper from Regions Bank. No one raises a hand, but Harper looks skeptical. “Well, you’re all getting ready for college, and you’ll soon be bombarded.”

As Harper goes over the ins and outs of credit scoring, bank accounts, and how to write a check, several kids take notes. She goes over the types of bankruptcy and tells them “it should always be a last resort.”

People like Harper and officer Dennis Manning (who’s leading the session) are hoping to nip the bankruptcy problem in the bud so, new bill or not, it won’t become an issue these kids have to face.

According to a 2005 Nellie Mae report, 76 percent of college undergrads have a credit card, but only 21 percent of students pay their cards off in full each month. The average student balance is $2,169, and 25 percent of students with cards owe $3,000 or more.

“You get credit-card applications when you buy your school books for college,” says Fila. “What kind of message does that send? They want to hook these kids in early. They know they’ll graduate and get high-paying jobs.”

Some of those college kids may end up filing bankruptcy. That’s why Kelly Rousseau of the bankruptcy court started C.A.R.E. (Credit Abuse Resistance Education) in Memphis earlier this year. The program goes into local high schools to teach kids financial literacy.

So far, Rousseau has taken the program to the Memphis Grizzlies Academy, Lausanne Collegiate School, Houston High School, and Millington High School. She says she hopes to get the program into city schools by next year.

“We’re teaching kids the difference between needs and wants. They need to know if they buy something with a credit card, they need to pay it off when the bill comes in,” says Rousseau. “Having a card for true emergencies is okay. It’s a good way to establish credit, but it depends on how responsible they can be.”

In a perfect world, financial planning would be a part of every high school curriculum. But this is not a perfect world. For the foreseeable future anyway, Memphis will continue to have debtors who turn to bankruptcy as their only way out. They’ll just have a harder time trying to do so.

“The law changed a lot, but it didn’t change the economics of the situation,” says Fila. “People are still broke. They’re still struggling. They still have car notes, and the debt and financial pressure is still out there. But now the outlet’s been restricted.”

Categories
News The Fly-By

Losing House and Home

On Laurel Lake Drive, a suburban street in Southeast Shelby County, a five-bedroom, four-bath brick home sits empty. Built last year, it has a three-car garage and is a spacious 3,836 square feet.

But this is by no means a model home.

The property, located near the new Shelby County high school, is one of about 5,000 homes that were foreclosed on during the last quarter.

Last week, a risk management provider listed Memphis as one of the top five markets for mortgage risk and fraud, with very good reason. According to RealtyTrac, an online marketplace for foreclosure properties, there’s one foreclosure for every 101 households in Memphis. Only Indianapolis, Atlanta, and Dallas fare worse.

“These are not only affordable, entry-level homes,” says Beanie Self, executive director of the Southeast Memphis Community Development Corporation (CDC). “These are $200,000, $300,000, $400,000 houses.”

The Southeast Memphis CDC is the only suburban CDC in Shelby County and was created, in part, after the University of Memphis identified a high number of foreclosures occurring in the Hickory Hill area.

“After the city annexed the area, there were a lot of significant problems,” says Self. “Property values went down because people were leaving and crime was up. When the property values went down, the homes were upside down. They owed more on their homes than they were worth, and a lot of people just walked away.”

Hickory Hill rivals Frayser for the most foreclosures, but since Self started tracking local foreclosures about three years ago, she’s seen the number increase 20 to 25 percent each year.

“What we see happening is that folks end up getting into a bigger house than they can afford and a larger loan than they can handle,” says Self.

As the former bankruptcy capital of the nation (read more in this week’s cover story), it’s not unheard of for Memphians to find themselves in financial trouble, but perhaps most telling is the scale of the current problem.

At the corner of Holmes and Hacks Cross, signs litter the roadways promising “New Homes! Zero Money Down!” But in neighborhoods still too new to be “mapquested,” banks are already foreclosing on houses: a $235,000 home on Maids Morton, a $100,000 home on Busy, a $168,000 home on Briona Cove — all foreclosures.

Because the housing market is saturated, many home builders offer special financing incentives. Mortgage brokers sell buyers on interest-only loans or Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs) that can get them more house for the money, but it’s not always the best deal in the long run.

“There might not be a down-payment or closing costs. Two months later,” says Self, “the transmission goes out on the car and it’s, ‘Do I pay for that or the mortgage this month?'”

Residents can quickly find themselves owing more on their house than its market value, especially if they have an interest-only loan.

“Tennessee has been targeted by unscrupulous lending groups,” says Self. “We have not had the kind of regulations in place to tackle predatory lending.”

A new bill passed earlier this year will go into effect in January, but for some homeowners, it might be too late.

“Within the next year, it’s going to be really significant,” says Self. “Specifically with the ARMs or with the interest-only loans, when the principal payments kick in, it’s going to be huge.”

Not to burst your housing bubble, but this soap opera can have long-ranging effects.

The Southeast Memphis CDC is a HUD-approved housing provider, meaning it can buy foreclosed properties from the national department of Housing and Urban Development at a discount and then sell them to owner-occupants.

Only, other people are interested in the discounted property, too. “I can’t compete with the investor market,” says Self. “We have a very different cash flow.”

When investors buy property, it generally becomes a rental unit. And, nothing against renters, but rental property can contribute to a decline in the neighborhood. Especially if — as is often the case with rental houses — the landlord is not on-site.

Owning a home is the American dream. We’re a country that rewards citizens for buying a home with a tax break. Loans are available to help people buy a house who otherwise wouldn’t be able to afford one. The latest economic upswing was predicated on the housing market.

But the number of local foreclosures — and the variety of neighborhoods in which they occur — should be an eye-opener. If this is the American dream, maybe it’s time for Memphis to wake up.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

Public Election Financing

One of the most intriguing candidates this election season is a first-timer named Bill Morrison. An ex-serviceman and educator from Bartlett, he knows something, too, about disabilities, having lost a leg to a horrendous accident involving some wayward machinery. Morrison is the Democratic nominee against the redoubtable Marsha Blackburn, a Republican whose hold on the 7th congressional district has been regarded as unassailable — partly because of Blackburn’s abilities (she’s a dynamite campaigner and serves as an assistant whip in the House of Representatives) and partly because the 7th was gerrymandered long ago to be safely Republican.

Indeed, no Democrat has held the seat since 1972. So Bill Morrison is entitled to some admiration merely for trying. But what is most interesting about his candidacy was revealed last week during a fund-raiser/house party in his honor in Bartlett. Following a speech, he subjected himself to questions about health care, No Child Left Behind, Iraq. About anything and everything.

Remarkably, he answered all of these questions not just by stating his positions on the issues. Morrison went a step further and explained what he would do logistically to get his ideas converted into law or established policy — what agencies he would need to interact with, whom he would have to deal with on the other political side, what the relevant time-frames were. The final question he got indicated both an irony in his situation and a flaw in our current election system.

He was asked: “Are you getting any money from the DCCC” (Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee)? No, he answered, and there was no logistical plan to deal with that other than to keep on using the bare-bones budget he’s using to do what campaigning he can, worked around the requirements of his job as a classroom teacher.

For all the handicaps he’s suffering from, Morrison has attracted some attention. He got the endorsement of the venerable Nashville Tennessean two weeks ago and cites a home-grown poll that shows him within striking distance of Blackburn.

Maybe so, maybe no. The point is, he’s doing well under the circumstances, maybe exceeding expectations.

This is not a brief for Bill Morrison. We are not in the habit of endorsing candidates, and, for that matter, Blackburn has much to be said for her. What we regret is that residents of the 7th District won’t get the chance to make a fair comparison between the two candidates because they aren’t equally matched financially. Not even close.

The only thing that could fix such situations as these — and Bill Morrison’s case is not unique — is a simple reform that hasn’t yet been enacted and may never be: public financing of elections.

The Congress that is elected this year, whether Republican or Democratic, is sure to be organized differently and to have some new faces. Before its members settle down to the same-old same-old routine, we wish they’d give this perfectly sensible idea a fair shake.