Categories
News News Blog News Feature

CA Dodges Layoffs In Latest Round From Gannett, Loses Open Position

The Commercial Appeal dodged layoffs in the latest round of news staff reductions by Gannett, the paper’s parent, but lost one open position.

Gannett was slated to lay off 6 percent of its national news staff this week, or about 200 employees. This move came after a previous round of similar layoffs a few months before.

Laura Testino, president of the Memphis Newspaper Guild, confirmed the Commercial Appeal news in a Friday tweet. But she said “everyone loses when working hours and jobs are cut.”

Testino put the situation into context in a Twitter thread and offered ways for locals to help reporters affected by the cuts.

Read the thread here:

Categories
News News Blog

Commercial Appeal Ownership to Change (Again)

New Media Investment Group, parent company of GateHouse Media, and Gannett, the corporation that currently owns and publishes the Memphis Commercial Appeal, have announced a merger.

A New Media Investment Group spokesman said that the company had arrived at an agreement to acquire Gannett (GCI) for a combination of stock and cash. Gannett publishes USA Today, in addition to many well-known local newspapers, including most major Tennessee dailies. GateHouse Media operates in 612 markets in 39 states.

According to the press release announcing the merger, Gannett shareholders will own 49.5 percent of the new company, and New Media shareholders will own 50.5 percent.

The deal is reportedly worth $1.38 billion. The combined company will be called Gannett and will be based at Gannett’s headquarters in McLean, Virginia. The merger means that the new company will own around one-sixth of all newspapers in the United States.

The press release said the merger will mean estimated annual savings of around $275 to $300 million and would help the new Gannett save on technology and human resources, and accelerate its “digital transformation.” Saving on “human resources” has often meant layoffs in newspaper company mergers.

“We believe this transaction will create value for our shareholders, greater opportunities for our employees, and a stronger future for journalism,” said Michael Reed, chief executive of New Media.

Both companies issued memos to their employees Monday. The Poynter Institute published copies of them here.

Daniel Connolly, president of the Memphis Newspaper Guild at The Commercial Appeal said: â€śHere in Memphis, we haven’t had a chance yet to meet and discuss the merger news as a local labor union, though I know from talking with some of our members individually that they’re very interested in it.

The obvious question is whether we’ll have additional job cuts here in Memphis. Right now, we don’t know.

At the national level, The NewsGuild leadership is following this issue very closely and studying what it means for our unions and employees. We’ll need to get a briefing on this merger from the subject-level experts who are reviewing it, and we may be able to stake out a more definite position once we learn more.”

Categories
Fly On The Wall Blog Opinion

Gannett Shareholders Reject MNG Nominees, Avoiding Takeover For Now

UPDATE: Gannett/Tribune merger talks?

There’s some fairly good news for people who care about the information industry.

In an act of relative sanity, Gannett shareholders have — at least temporarily — turned back MNG/Alden Global Capital’s attempted hostile takeover. For Memphians, that means The Commercial Appeal avoided falling into the fire of hedge-fund ownership, though it remains a frying pan heated by economic pressure, and hedge-fund created trends. In the short run, it means we won’t lose the city’s historic paper of record, giving the newly right-sized and relocated newspaper an opportunity to claw its way back to relevance.

Beyond the actual vote, what followed was like a conversation from fantasy land.

Via USA Today:

Gannett Chairman [John Jeffry] Louis said the company is “laser focused on transformation” and is successfully transitioning to a business model that “positions the company to thrive in the digital future.” 

Settle down Flash Gordon! The laser-wielding chairman muddles issues and arguments, in ways a good debate team might challenge, but he’s at least partly correct. Only significant digital growth isn’t reclaiming segments of lost readership, and nothing is keeping pace with losses in traditional models where the bedrock of local news is going to pieces. Newspapers have been cutting their way to “sustainability” for decades now, and as a result, the products look like chemo patients, taking a cure that’s also killing them. Hopes and prayers go out in the form of stories about AI, digital inevitability, and an abiding belief that we’ll be saved by the same kinds of disruptions that brought us to this apocalyptic prom date.

Meanwhile, comments from MNG — a company famous for its community-be-damned, slash-and-burn roadmap to double-digit profits — read like broadcasts from Bizarro world.

Via USA Today:

“This is a win for an entrenched Gannett Board that has been unwilling to address the current realities of the newspaper business, and sadly a loss for Gannett and its shareholders,” MNG said in a statement. “Gannett’s newspapers are critical local resources, and we hope that Gannett’s incumbent Board and Management shift course to embrace a modern approach to local news that will save newspapers and serve communities. That would be the best outcome. If Gannett’s Board does not shift course from overpaying for non-core, aspirational and dilutive digital deals, we believe the stock will drop further.”

HA! That’s rich stuff right there. Though, who’s to say in regard to the final prediction.

For the moment, Memphis is a two-daily-newspaper town. Though, one — The Daily Memphian — doesn’t exist in paper form. That’s weird, right? And it feels like it should be awesome. Though, between intrinsic, probably unavoidable redundancy in beats, it’s difficult to measure at the moment just how much more is being covered or how much more audience is reached and influenced as a result.

Branding matters. The force with which any story lands is determined, in part, by reach, and the strength of certain social bonds. There’s historic erosion in both these areas and recent redundancies.

SB 30 Episode 9: Chris Davis of the Memphis Flyer

For our show April 28, we sat down with journalist Chris Davis of the Memphis Flyer and took an in-depth look at the current landscape of the print newspaper and how we got here, based in part on Chris’ great reporting for his Flyer series Justice in Journalism, and his March 14, 2019 story ‘Going to Pieces’ (link below).

Gannett Shareholders Reject MNG Nominees, Avoiding Takeover For Now (2)

If one cares to indulge in fantasy, (as executives at Gannett and MNG clearly do) it’s not that hard to picture a positive result from the almost certain disaster of MNG control. If the CA underperformed, it might be sold off locally, and relatively cheaply. Once upon a time interests behind The Daily Memphian wanted to pull off just that kind of ownership transfer, so it’s not completely insane to picture some kind of triumphant restoration, with lost employees returning to old beats in new digs. Like, I said — fantasy. It’s not entirely unprecedented but, as is the case with  most genie wishes, there’s a price.

Like one friend on social media said, “One-and-a-half cheers for the less bad guys!” That’s about right.  But I’m also reminded of Avengers: Infinity War when Drax the Destroyer tells Star-Lord he’s a sandwich away from being fat. Newspapers are priced to flip these days, and now that it’s been looted, the CA is one disruption away from whatever comes next.

via GIPHY

Gannett Shareholders Reject MNG Nominees, Avoiding Takeover For Now

One sentence summary: Gannett, and Memphis dodged a bullet, but the gun’s still loaded. 

Categories
News News Blog

Gannett: MNG Trying to “Derail Our Progress”

Gannett Co., owner of The Commercial Appeal, urged its shareholders Wednesday to vote for its slate of board candidates to stave off a hostile takeover from rival media company, MNG Enterprises.

MNG is backed by the Alden Global Capital hedge fund and is also known as Digital First Media. MNG recently sent Gannett an unsolicited offer to buy the company for more than $1 billion. Gannett board members rejected the offer.

MNG later offered up a slate of candidates to run for Gannett’s board, a move to take control of the company and, apparently, force the sale of the company to MNG.

The final vote on those candidates is slated for Gannett’s annual shareholder meeting on May 16th. On Wednesday, Gannett sent a letter to shareholders touting the experience and expertise of its nominees.

Gannett criticized MNG’s slate. It said MNG is “attempting to derail our progress and take control of Gannett.”

“In contrast to Gannett’s eight independent nominees, all of MNG’s nominees have irreconcilable conflicts of interest given their close affiliations with MNG and/or Alden – and in some cases their fiduciary duties to MNG and Alden,” reads the letter.

Touting its own slate, Gannett pointed to its board’s actions to build a “best-in-class digital marketing solutions organization and local-to-national news network that have driven growth in digital subscribers, audience engagement, and advertising and marketing services revenues.”

Here are some of the numbers Gannett listed as signs of its growth:

• Growing digital subscribers by 46 percent, bringing total paid digital-only subscribers to over 500,000.

• Growing ReachLocal revenues by 15 percent.

• Growing national digital advertising revenue by 19 percent and transforming USA Today’s advertising revenue to be 75 percent digital.

Categories
News News Blog

Gannett Still Skeptical on $1.8B MNG Deal as Takeover Threat Looms

Gannett Co. leaders said they remain skeptical of MNG Enterprises’ $1.8 billion offer to buy the newspaper company after a meeting late last week.

MNG made an unsolicited offer to buy Gannett, the corporate owner of The Commercial Appeal, last month for $12 per share, or $1.8 billion. Gannett leaders said they first learned of the offer in a story in The Wall Street Journal. Gannett leaders rejected the offer a week ago, claiming MNG failed to provide details on financing the deal, antitrust issues, and more.

MNG, a company also known as Digital First, is owned largely by a New York hedge fund, Alden Global Capital. Digital First operates The Boston Herald and The Denver Post, according to USA Today. MNG owns a 7.5 percent stake in Gannett. 

Leaders from both companies met on Thursday, according to a news release from Gannett Monday morning, to hammer out details. But the information given in that meeting was “deficient” and did not convince Gannett leaders, the newspaper company said.

“We are disappointed that at the meeting on February 7, MNG again failed to provide substantive answers to the basic questions Gannett has repeatedly raised,” Jeffrey Louis, Gannett’s board chairman, said in a statement. “Instead, MNG offered vague and generic statements that further confirmed the board’s decision to reject MNG’s proposal.”

Here are some details from the meeting, according to Gannett:

• MNG said it would fund the deal with debt financing.

• MNG had not secured the financing, nor had it contacted potential financing sources.

• MNG offered ”vague assurances” and said that it is not concerned about antitrust issues.

• MNG said the transaction would be a merger, “not the acquisition proposal that MNG had previously put forth.”

“Despite being afforded every opportunity to provide Gannett with specifics related to these important matters, [R. Joseph Fuchs, executive chairman of MNG] refused to provide any substantive, actionable evidence of a credible proposal,” reads a Gannett statement.

POSSIBLE HOSTILE TAKEOVER

During a break in these talks, MNG told Gannett leaders that the company intends to nominate six MNG-affiliated candidates to Gannett’s board of directors during the next shareholder meeting. That board will shrink to nine members during that meeting. Filling the board with MNG candidates could amount to a hostile takeover of the company.

“Gannett believes MNG’s clearly conflicted nominees are not in a position to fairly, and in a disinterested way, evaluate and advise Gannett shareholders on MNG’s proposed transaction,” reads a Gannett news release.

Three of the MNG candidates my not be legally capable of serving on the Gannett board, Gannett said, given their roles at MNG. Another, the 78-year-old Fuchs, exceeds Gannett’s mandatory retirement age for board members.

”MNG’s acknowledgement that these nominations are indeed intended to advance its efforts to acquire Gannett further underscores the proposed nominees’ clear and irreconcilable conflicts of interest and inability to satisfy fiduciary responsibilities to all Gannett shareholders,” said Louis.

Categories
News News Blog

Gannett Rejects MNG Purchase Deal

Justin Fox Burks

Gannett Co.’s board of directors unanimously rejected MNG Enterprises’ offer to buy the company, calling the proposal “not credible” and saying it undervalued Gannett.

MNG proposed buying the newspaper company, owner of The Commercial Appeal, earlier this month, in an unsolicited deal worth $12 per share. The move left many to worry that the company would lay off even more staff at Gannett papers to drive profitability.

But Gannett board chairman Jeffry Louis said the board is optimistic about the company’s future and its digital strategy.

“Our board of directors is confident that Gannett has significant value creation potential,” Louis said in a statement. “Our vision and pursuit of our digital transformation, combined with our USA Today Network strategy, enables us to serve more directly and efficiently the persistent demand of our audiences and customers to engage with their communities.

“We believe that our future — and that of the industry — turns on thoughtful investments in journalism and marketing solutions, so we can deliver engagement when, where, and how our audiences and customers demand it. Delivering on this purpose will deliver value to our shareholders and benefit the communities we serve.”

“We know there are challenges that face us and our industry. We firmly believe, however, that given our operational expertise, our focus on evolving our business model, and our unwavering commitment to remaining a trusted source of news, we are uniquely positioned to grow this company and its valuable assets.”
[pullquote-1] A news release from Gannett early Monday morning provided some interesting details of the deal proposed by MNG. The company’s actions — before and since its public proposal — “suggest that MNG’s proposal is not credible,” according to Gannett.

MNG did not talk to Gannett officials before a story of the offer appeared in The Wall Street Journal. Gannett received a letter from MNG a day after the story ran, even though “MNG and Gannett management are well known to one another and in fact are partners in significant operations.”

MNG did not give Gannett any information on how it would finance the deal and “failed to address potential regulatory risks and other fundamental issues that Gannett considered important.” Gannett leaders did meet with MNG officials but left with unanswered questions.

“Gannett posed questions to MNG that are routinely addressed by someone making a credible, public, unsolicited takeover proposal: Can MNG fund it? Can MNG close it?” according to Gannett.
[pullquote-2] Without the information, Gannett leaders said they felt uncomfortable signing a non-disclosure agreement with MNG. Gannett said they asked for written responses to questions that would not have required MNG to disclose confidential information. But MNG would not give them any more information about how it would execute the deal.

“In light of this, Gannett now questions MNG’s motives and can only conclude that the proposed nondisclosure agreement is a distraction designed to mask MNG’s inability to finance and complete the proposed transaction,” reads Gannett’s news release. “Indeed, given MNG’s refusal to provide even the most basic answers to Gannett’s questions, it appears that MNG does not have a realistic plan to acquire Gannett.”

Categories
Fly On The Wall Blog Opinion

MAGA Bro Pens Love Letter to MAGA CAP: Dammit Gannett

“Nonpartisan” and “fair and balanced” journalism sound like great ideas. But they probably aren’t what you think they are. They’ve been made to sound like best practices for ethical news gathering. But historically these ideas are artifacts of technology and capitalism.

I bring this stuff up because getting beyond all the usual ideological mess and straight bullshit like this tone-deaf nonsense from The Tennessean, is crucial to understanding why “writer and social media personality” Ryan Moore’s weird love letter to his Make America Great Again (MAGA) hat appeared in Gannett newspapers including The Commercial Appeal.

A screen shot/excerpt from The Commercial Appeal.

America’s partisan-funded press came skidding to a halt in the last quarter of the 19th century when new, high-speed printing made it possible for newspapers with enough up-front investment capital to distribute their products farther than ever before. Lots of attention is paid to the idea that “a biased news medium is bad for a self-governing people.” But the thing is, at scale, it was also bad for business. Politically neutral papers could reach bigger markets becoming valuable to local interests and emerging national brands wanting less partisan places to advertise.  Economic realities forged the new journalistic ideals regarding what makes appropriate news content, not idealistic struggles for better information and freer reporting. And they still do.

A similar technological disruption bent the modern media mythos away from big-market “objectivity” toward a more useful narrative for an exploded economy: “fair and balanced.” This works in a crowded field because you can’t know the truth until you’ve heard every [hardline ideological] side, right?  When cable news blew up and America went from having only three major news networks to having so many choices you could no longer get by without a remote control, the basic idea of what constitutes respectable market shares reduced considerably. Niche marketing and partisan reporting made sense again. This is where Fox News comes from and with it the logical fallacy that all tits require right-wing tats. 

So what does any of this have to do with Gannett’s MAGA-Man-crush?

Like I’ve said before, markets determine content and Tennessee remains a solid red patch on the political map. Gannett’s earnings are in the shitter and its products, deformed as they are by a loss of local autonomy and investment, waste like plague victims. So much reporting and media opinion following the infamous MAGA-Teen‘s 15-minutes in the barrel, cast MAGA caps in a bad light, and judging by the color of those electoral maps I’ve linked above, that’s the favored headgear of many if not most Tennesseans. In other words, the news smacked lots of Gannett’s subscribers and potential subscribers right across the brim. 

Market served. “Tat” accomplished.

Moore’s editorial is mostly familiar rhetoric about folks needing to be respectful of other folks and judging people by the content of their character, not the color of their stupid, racist hats. I could do a whole post on irony and the character of Moore’s content, but that’s not my purpose.

âś–
This stuff’s candy — bulked up by outrage-shares and sweetened with hate-clicks.
click to tweet

If serving readers/viewers/listeners is important it’s probably not a good idea for news-oriented media to be in the business of promoting standard, white-male victimization narratives. If media serves a public good it’s also probably a bad idea to participate in softening symbols that, regardless of what secret, special things they may mean to social media personalities, are also, inarguably, touchstones for white supremacists.

But c’mon! From a commercial POV this stuff’s candy — bulked up by outrage-shares and sweetened with hate-clicks. Win-win for everybody! Unless the consumer was looking for information instead of a daily rise, in which case, not so much there.

Nevertheless, the story went big opening Moore’s complaint up to a wider dialogue.

Top comment, Newsweek

I’ll conclude my rant by answering some rage-posts I’ve seen in my social media feed from folks justifiably wondering why MAGA-bro Moore is fronting all over their social media feeds. The real question is, why are you sharing it? And are you ready for more?

It’s just business; thanks for yours.   

 

Categories
Fly On The Wall Blog Opinion

Gannett Layoffs Hit Commercial Appeal Newsroom

In December of last year, Fly on the Wall predicted layoffs would be forthcoming at Gannett sometime after the new year. It had seemed like an inevitability since November’s dismal quarterly report and the call for early buyouts that always presages another round of cuts. 

Yesterday, it finally happened. On Wednesday, January 23rd, Gannett laid off newsroom employees at newspapers across the country.

Via Poynter:

Another brutal day for journalism.

Gannett began slashing jobs all across the country Wednesday in a cost-cutting move that was anticipated even before the recent news that a hedge-fund company was planning to buy the chain.

The cuts were not minor.

The CA, which lost many top-of-pay scale employees to the Daily Memphian startup and has been under a hiring freeze, appears to have fared better than many Gannett publications.

As of now only one newsroom layoff has been confirmed. Four open positions have been eliminated. This story will be updated as more is known.

  

Categories
Fly On The Wall Blog Opinion

Commercial Appeal Shares Holiday Story of Messiah-Like Christmas Stocking

When the holidays get hectic and stressful it’s good for the soul to pause and remember the true reason for the season: Selling shit. Anxious for this yearly opportunity to serve a special convergence of reader interest and advertiser need, many news organizations, including the one that publishes this blog, create special gift guides. That’s why it’s so nice that The Commercial Appeal went a completely different way and told the story of a magical Christmas stocking that suffers for your favorite cook.

Wait, never mind. It’s just another gift guide. That “suffers” bit was just a typo. Our bad. Fly on the Wall has been hoping for miracles lately, and we thought this might be one.

Dammit.

Categories
Fly On The Wall Blog Opinion

Will The Commercial Appeal Face More Newsroom Layoffs?

Gannett: Newspapers lack resources to spellcheck their own names. Will likely cut more of these resources.

Will The Commercial Appeal face more newsroom layoffs? Probably. Can the diminished daily newspaper withstand more cuts? It’s hard to say. But before getting into any of that, I’d like to share a few of the things Maribel Wadsworth, president of USA Today Network, allegedly told Gannett employees during a company-wide conference call according to a report by The Nashville Scene. I’d then like to provide an easy to understand translation for folks who don’t work in the print media and therefore won’t be hip to the industry’s famously colorful jargon.

• “As we continue this transition … it’s important to understand … that it will require us to think about our overall cost structure in alignment with profitability.”

Translated: layoffs are coming.

• “Going forward, we will be a smaller company.”

Translated: Layoffs are coming.

• â€śIt’s gonna feel rocky at times. It just is. We just have to be very clear-eyed about that.”

Translated: Layoffs are coming.

Tennessean staffers were also told:

• â€śThere is no plan for a mass layoff before Christmas.”

Translation: HAPPY NEW YEAR, SUCKERS!

None of this is surprising. Gannett’s Q3 numbers weren’t good. Digital growth isn’t making up for losses in print and the company is looking to cut operating costs. In previous years, when the CA was a Scripps property, layoffs inevitably followed any efforts to recruit early retirees. It seems as though the trend will continue under Gannett. In November, a company-wide buyout offer targeted employees over 55 with more than 15-years experience. The deadline to take Gannett’s offer of 30-35-weeks pay, and a possible bonus of up to $5,520 is December 10th.