Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Court Promises Swift Ruling on Tennessee Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

A federal appeals court has promised a swift decision in a legal challenge to Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming healthcare for minors.

At issue during Friday’s oral arguments, held before a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: whether to set aside a lower court’s temporary block of the law.

The appeals court has already intervened once, on an emergency basis, allowing Tennessee’s law to take effect until they could hear arguments in the case. The intervention, in July, marked the the first time a federal court allowed a ban on gender-affirming care to take effect in the country. Other federal courts have blocked such bans, finding they violated the Equal Protection Clause, Due Process Clause, and First Amendment.

Addressing the court on Friday, Chase Strangio, deputy director for transgender justice at the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Project, argued the law discriminates on the basis of sex. The U.S. government has also intervened in the case on behalf of the Tennessee plaintiffs, who include children receiving gender-affirming care and their parents.

Federal court temporarily halts Tennessee ban on transgender care for minors

Clark L. Hildabrand. deputy chief of staff and senior counsel for the Tennessee Attorney General argued the courts should defer to the legislature.

The court on Friday heard a nearly-identical challenge to a ban on gender-affirming care for minors in Kentucky.

Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, acknowledged he struggled with both cases. Sutton authored the July decision allowing Tennessee’s ban to go into effect.

“I think we have to come to grips with the larger picture — at age 18, this all goes away,” he said. Sutton said he was struck by arguments that withholding treatment for minors can subject them to harm.

“I think this is your strongest argument,” he said, adding that compassion is also needed for those who may later regret receiving care. “I feel like there’s compassion in both directions.”

Tennessee Lookout is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Tennessee Lookout maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Holly McCall for questions: info@tennesseelookout.com. Follow Tennessee Lookout on Facebook and Twitter.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

TEP Expects Attacks on Adult Gender-Affirming Care and School Curriculum in Next Legislative Session

The Tennessee Equality Project (TEP) expects ongoing attacks on adult gender-affirming care in the next legislative session.

This prediction comes days after the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Tennessee’s law that bans doctors from administering gender-affirming care to minors. A preliminary injunction was issued prior to this ruling in late June.

Senate Bill 1 was signed into law by Governor Bill Lee on March 2nd and prohibits healthcare professionals from administering gender-affirming care to minors. The law was set to take effect on July 1st.

This legislation will make gender-affirming hormone therapy and puberty blockers inaccessible, and trans people in Tennessee will not have access to this care until they reach the age of 18. Similar restrictions have been made in states like Arkansas and Alabama.

“Not content to ban it for youth, I think the legislature will probably explore ways to make it [gender-affirming care] more difficult for adults,” said Chris Sanders, executive director of TEP and the Tennessee Equality Project Foundation.

The Campaign for Southern Equality released a report entitled “LGBTQ Tennesseans: A Report of the 2021 Southern LGBTQ Experiences Survey,” in which they highlighted the experiences of more than 4,000 LGBTQ people in the South. The report said that Tennessee does not “have laws guaranteeing LGBTQ access to healthcare or protecting LGBTQ people from discrimination in healthcare.”

The report also stated that state Medicaid policy and state employee health insurance policy “explicitly exclude coverage for gender affirming care.”

While the state does allow for adults to access gender-affirming care, there have been other issues that have stalled progress for transgender people in Tennessee. The Flyer recently reported that a federal lawsuit regarding changes to gender markers on Tennessee birth certificates was dismissed.

Sanders explained that he believed that progress has not been linear in the state, and that it actually takes a “zig-zagging” path. He also explained that there aren’t many legal protections in the state aside from what the federal government provides.

There is also the possibility of “more attacks” on school curriculum on the elementary and secondary level, as well as in higher education, Sanders said.

Governor Bill Lee signed Senate Bill 102 into law in May of 2023, which allows Tennessee school and university employees to skip implicit bias training. In 2021, the legislature passed a bill that “requires an LEA or public charter school to notify a student’s parent or guardian prior to commencing instruction of a sexual orientation or gender identity curriculum.”

“You see those kinds of fights play out in local school boards around the state as well,” Sanders said.

Sanders cited that a school board member in Wilson County, Tennessee, proposed a policy that would out transgender youth in schools. He explained that the policy has yet to advance, but he said it is typical of the types of things that are playing out around the state.

“I can’t imagine there would be a serious proposal that would advance like that [in Shelby County], but some of your West Tennessee school boards I’m sure, given time, will pick up those things,” Sanders said.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Tennessee Equality Project Speaks on Trans Healthcare Bill

Tennessee medical professionals could lose their license if they provide gender-affirming care to minors with a new law now under consideration by the Tennessee General Assembly.

the proposed legislation says that these procedures can “lead to the minor becoming irreversibly sterile, having increased risk of disease and illness, or [suffer] from adverse and sometimes fatal psychological consequences.”

This legislation also allows civil litigation against a healthcare provider who performs such procedures. These lawsuits could be brought within 30 years from the date the minor reaches 18 years of age, or within 10 years from the date of the minor’s death if the minor dies. It also allows relatives of a minor to bring a wrongful death action against a healthcare providers in such cases under certain conditions.

In October of 2022, the Flyer reported that Tennessee law currently allows for access to gender-affirming healthcare for youth.

Jace Wilder studies and teaches transgender policies for the Tennessee Equality Project.

“We really have to keep a critical eye on what is the goal of our legislature, and what initiatives or what funding they’re getting to really just continue to police and criminalize a minority group of people,” Wilder said.

The Flyer was able to talk with Wilder, about gender affirming care for minors, misconceptions around the procedures, and what could be next for trans youth in Tennessee. — Kailynn Johnson

Why would doctors choose not to delay care for minors who are transitioning?

Jace Wilder: So, one of the things that gets left behind a lot is the narrative of the effects of delaying care. That includes suicide rates going up. That one has been proven over and over again. Lack of access to care, lack of actual equitable care, and — even more so — not having support from both family and from medical providers proves to have worse outcomes for those youth that have to delay their care.

When they see laws like this, that prohibit them from accessing their own care, they automatically can see that their state doesn’t really care about them, or care about their health care access. So, when it comes to delaying care, you’re also reinforcing that isolation.

Whenever we go into doctors’ offices, the assumption right now is that you just go in, and you get on hormones, and you get surgery, and it’s all just kind of like this one movement. But the reality is that, according to both [World Professional Association for Transgender Health – WPATH], which is the organization that provides the standards of care for trans people…is that doctors can just sometimes provide counseling to families about how to respect and encourage their trans child after they come out, provide education for those parents, who may be not ready to take that step with their child about accessing health care, or accessing HRT and surgeries, and continue to counsel them.

This bill will eliminate the ability to even have those conversations because it’s seen as coercion…and can be declared child abuse of a parent to just ask their doctor about how to care for their trans kid.

You mentioned that one of the harmful effects of this bill would be that trans youth would believe that their state doesn’t care about them. The text of the bill states that, “the legislature must take action to protect the health and welfare of minors.” Do you believe that this statement contradicts the actual legislation?

JW: It ignores the actual wishes and desires of the trans youth. What they’re doing is ignoring years and years of advocacy and science from both scientists who care and doctors that actually care for trans youth, and the families that have seen the positive effects of transition or have seen the positive effects of just providing support for trans youth. It’s ignoring all that in favor of acting like a hero, while villainizing a minoritized community. They’re just ignoring what is actually wanted by trans youth and their families.

You also talked a little bit earlier about how a lot of people kind of have this misconception that there is just one approach to trans healthcare. Do you think any of these misconceptions have contributed to the legislature pushing for this legislation to be passed?

JW: I think that some of the misconception comes from…one, the speed of it. The standards of care that they are provided with show that there are certain ages in which they are already not allowed to give hormone replacement therapy or puberty blockers.

They, also already laid out who is allowed and who is not allowed to have surgeries, and all hospitals, any hospital or medical clinic with any kind of accreditation, that would make it legal for them to even function have to follow those standards of care because they’re implemented by the hospitals.

A lot of times we get stuck in this narrative that it’s all this one giant conspiracy to speed up the process to transition people who should not be transitioned. The reality is people are actually struggling to even access the care in the first place, and when they do it takes a really long time to get through that process, if they even do by the time they’re 18.

What do you all think is next for trans healthcare in Tennessee?

JW: We’re seeing is this escalation to even saying that trans people who are 25 — legal adults who can vote, legal adults who can drink, who can serve for their country — these individuals don’t have the right to determine their own health care, based off of this weird idea that the state knows best. But this only for this very small group that cannot be heard in their own legislature.

It’s just going to push and possibly extend out to the age of 25. In fact, [Rep. William Lamberth (R-Portland)] kind of mentioned that  alongside [Daily Wire host] Matt Walsh in the House committee hearing that just happened.

We’re also seeing that in the drag queen bill they labeled drag as impersonation of another gender, meaning that we’re really getting on that ledge of going back to the 1980s. It’s drawing back to that idea that impersonating another gender is somehow criminal, and that being another gender than you were born as is a criminal act. So, we are seeing the full on policing and criminalization of trans folks at this point.