Categories
News News Blog

Homeownership: Is It Out of Reach for Young Buyers?

A recent post detailing median apartment asking rents for May 2022 has gone viral on social media. The comments section on the story, “Rents across U.S. rise above $2,000 a month for the first time ever” by Chris Arnold, is rife with speculation, commiseration, and accusation.  

The story, which was posted by NPR, details numbers from a Redfin report that shows that asking rents for available apartments had risen 15 percent from a year ago, and had also risen above $2,000 a month for the first time. The post received a mix of reactions, with many agreeing that these numbers are “unsustainable.”

“Mainly it’s because we have a lack of housing inventory available,” explains Amy Schaftlein, executive director of United Housing, a nonprofit affordable housing agency.

According to Schaftlein, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, rates were low, causing more people to “rush into the market,” in order to to take advantage of low interest rates. 

She continues, “Because rates were some of the lowest that we’ve seen, you have a whole bunch of people trying to get into homeownership, and we haven’t been building new homes, especially at the starter home level in about 10 years. So the Great Recession has really stopped new home builds from happening over the last 10 years.”

Schaftlein explains that these historically low rates, combined with historically low inventory, led to a rush in demand, which in turn pushed up housing prices across the board. That is not just at selling price. The same applies for rent.

“You’re having people on the lower-rent side being able to stay in their homes because of the eviction moratorium and some of the rent assistance, but then you’re not seeing new rents or new homes coming,” says Schaftlein.

Factoring this in with inflation and rising costs, the Federal Reserve has had to raise interest rates, which causes people who are homeowners and “stuck at these low rates” not to move.

“With an overly competitive real estate market with millennials and GenZ’ers not able to get in because it’s too competitive to get a home loan, many people gave up,” Schaftlein continues. “Even millennials with a higher income represent a huge increase in the amount of rent applications.”

Those who can afford to buy, and are opting to stay out of the home ownership market, are choosing to stay out due to the highly competitive nature of the market, pushing them to move toward renting, which causes rent prices to go up, Schaftlein says.

There are a number of reasons why younger people are not qualifying for loans in a timely fashion, such as student debt, as well as new trends in employment.

“We’re working differently,” Schaftlein says. “A lot of people that are contract workers aren’t going to be able to show that 24-month work history necessarily, because they may be entrepreneurs, or do more contract type of work.”

Schaftlein says that this type of work is typically harder for loan officers and lenders to underwrite, which, in turn, makes it harder for the applicants to qualify to get mortgage loans, even if they have the income and show it in the bank.

Remote work has also removed the pressure for people to “put down roots,” Schaftlein says. This allows people the freedom to move around and have more flexibility in their jobs, which she believes also contributes to the idea that younger people are no longer considering being homeowners.

Another factor is out-of-town investment by larger companies, who can afford to invest capital unavailable to individual buyers. As the Flyer’s Toby Sells wrote in his 2019 cover story “Dream Denied,” “More and more Memphians are missing out on the American Dream, especially if you consider homeownership a centerpiece of that dream. Wall Street corporations are sucking up homes in struggling neighborhoods, spitting them back out as rentals, and — in doing so — sucking out wealth and access to upward mobility, particularly in African-American communities.”

Still, while many are postponing the dream of being homeowners, there are still those who prefer that option.

“Rent prices definitely scare me,” 22-year-old Yazmeen Berkley says.

“I hear my peers talk about how high the rent is and how they have to make ends meet or how they’re tired of bills and although that will be my reality soon, I’m really thankful right now that it’s not.”

Berkley has decided to stay home with her parents, as they told her that they weren’t “rushing her to move out of the house.” It’s an option that is not available to everyone. But taken along with Schaftlein’s comment about millennials (who are now between 26 and 41 years old) representing an increase in the number of rental applications, it helps show a change in the age at which Memphians are attempting to achieve homeownership.

T’airra Fuller, 27, has lived in Collierville for two years for “an elevation in her career.” Fuller lost her job during the pandemic, and had to move back to Mississippi. Six-months later, Fuller says that rent had gone up to $1,100 and says that she is now paying $1,200 in rent. While she is paying for location and a promise of safety, she prefers to be in the process of purchasing a home.

“The house thing isn’t going too great right now,” Fuller says. “It’s kind of hard being a single woman and you’re the only one bringing income into the household. I had to take on another job. I quit my second job [retail], but I’m working on having my own independent call center, because it’s hard. You have to make ends meet. Some people have two incomes coming in, I have one.”

Categories
News The Fly-By

City Campus

Landlord and Normal Station neighborhood association president Jim Story wants — somewhat ironically — to see more homeowners living in his University of Memphis neighborhood.

“It’s not that we don’t want renters,” he says. “If you have one rental per street, the culture is homeowner, but when you have all renters and one homeowner … [the neighborhood] gets diluted by people who don’t have as much stake.”

Blame it on student housing, parking, or a need to expand, but modern universities have a tendency to erode the communities around them. And that’s just the sort of thing Story — as well as the non-profit University District Initiative and the school itself — hopes to stop.

Last week, as part of an Urban Land Institute program, former University of Pennsylvania facilities and real estate vice president Omar Blaik spoke to a group at the U of M. During his tenure at Penn, Blaik was in charge of a $2 billion campus transformation. Now, after founding U3 Ventures, Blaik consults with urban universities on integrating schools with their surrounding areas.

While at Penn, Blaik says, “I learned that I was not in the business of campus planning but that I was in the business of city planning.”

In the 1990s, the neighborhood around Penn was in decline. A student researcher had been murdered. The main drag was lined with parking lots and windowless, 1960s brick buildings facing toward the school. Students were advised to avoid West Philadelphia.

“In a way,” Blaik says, “Penn destroyed the community that existed.”

A similar situation transpired at the University of Colorado in Denver. The university positioned main buildings in the heart of its campus and surrounded them with the less essential uses: parking lots, athletic fields. (Sound familiar?) The result was a sort of unattractive moat around the campus.

“If you do [a campus plan], you start with the core and push out,” Blaik says. “It needs to be a campus/community plan and on the edges, you need vibrancy.”

At Penn, the university and its surrounding community members came up with an initiative: staff and faculty were given incentives to move into the area; a neighborhood school was created; and the university replaced parking lots with a grocery store, a movie theater, a cereal bar, dorms, apartments, and condos.

Blaik acknowledges real estate development is an unfamiliar function for most universities.

“Real estate is about risk; institutions are not. Real estate is opportunistic,” he says. “Institutions are methodical and systematic.”

Currently, the U of M has a plan for its new “front door” — an alumni center with a sprawling lawn — to face Highland Avenue. (To read about opposition to the proposed development, please see page 15.)

Football boosters also have talked about locating a football stadium on campus. But Story has another idea for the university: buy the Liberty Bowl and its surrounding property (another sea of asphalt). Let students going to class park there and take a shuttle to campus.

It’s not a bad idea. I can think of a few schools that already use a set-up like this, including my alma mater, Northwestern University. And that approach would free up some of the land surrounding the university for redevelopment.

“You can put a police officer on every corner, but if you have retail or entertainment — reasons to get people on the street — that’s the best way to make an area safe,” Blaik says. “People may say you’re creating an entertainment district. But these are essential amenities to creating a sustainable neighborhood.”

It’s something to think about, especially in the wake of football player Taylor Bradford’s murder. A sustainable — and safe — university neighborhood is also good for the entire city.

Cities used to be described by the companies that were located there: Memphis is very much FedEx’s town; Atlanta has Coke. But one look at International Paper — which decided to relocate its world headquarters to Memphis from Stamford, Connecticut, in 2006 — or Service Master — which relocated its headquarters from Chicago to Memphis the same year — shows that even large corporations are highly mobile.

“Cities don’t have a manufacturing base anymore,” Blaik says. “Even when [companies] are in cities, they are much more transient.”

But institutions of higher education and medical facilities — the eds and meds, as Blaik calls them — are not.

“In 90 years, the University of Memphis will probably still be located in Memphis. It’s not going to leave the city. That creates a unique bond,” Blaik says.

And while the city is somewhat dependent on local educational systems for its workforce, that’s not the only thing a school contributes to its community.

“We may think of institutions as factories that produce students,” Blaik says. “At the same time, they are huge economic engines that hire people, develop real estate, and procure materials.”

And not just for ivory towers.

Categories
Living Spaces Real Estate

Find your part in the American dream with a new home.

A home is more than just a structure where people take up residency. Owning a home means freedom, financial independence, and security. For many, owning a home brings a feeling of success, knowledge that they’ve obtained their own bit of the American dream. And, as for a home — according to Dorothy as well as millions of homeowners — well, there’s no place quite like it.

The advantages of today’s new homes are without parallel. Breakthrough technology has brought safety and energy efficiency in homes to a new level, and for conveniences and amenities, it’s hard to beat a new home.

Technology Brings Safety to the Forefront

Today’s homes are safer, because new homes take advantage of breakthroughs in building science. For example, hardwired and interconnected smoke alarms bring a new level of fire safety to new homes. If one alarm goes off in the garage, they will all go off, giving your family ample time to get to safety. New fire-resistant construction materials such as better electrical wiring mean less chance of a dangerous electrical fire. Tempered glass, now found in many patio doors and windows, means less chance of an injury should one break.

New Homes: More Energy-Efficient Than Ever

It is easier than ever for home shoppers looking at a new home to get access to energy-efficient construction. Builders nationwide are embracing new green building techniques designed to help protect our environment while saving you money. They also have an ever-expanding array of products and materials to choose from that enables them to make a house more resource-efficient and water-thrifty. Many participate in programs like ENERGY STAR, promoting energy-efficient appliances, and WaterSense, promoting water efficiency. ENERGY STAR-rated windows keep heat in during the winter and out during hot summer months, saving you money on heating and cooling costs. High-tech insulation ensures consistent temperatures throughout a new home while using less energy.

As more and more consumers demand a “leaner” home, builders are responding by returning to age-old practices, like siting a home to take the best advantage of sunlight and shade. Recent innovations like solar shingles (not just solar roof panels), light-conserving windows, and insulation made from recycled materials are also changing the market.

New Homes Offer Home Buyers Their Choice of Lifestyles

Today’s new homes offer more of what buyers want. Because of increased demands for larger socializing spaces in the home, larger kitchens are becoming more common. New homes also feature more bathrooms and more storage space. Consumers are seeking greater ceiling heights, walk-in showers with multiple heads, three-car garages, and outdoor entertainment spaces with fireplaces and grills. And builders are responding with new homes that provide these features.

So why do Americans like new homes? The answer lies in choice. People want to be able to personalize their home with their own tile, flooring, and appliance choices. In a new home, the consumer can select virtually everything down to the knobs on their kitchen cabinets. It’s all part of the American dream. ■

Keith Grant is president of the Memphis Area Home Builders Association.