Categories
Film Features Film/TV

The Suicide Squad

Frequently Asked Questions about The Suicide Squad

Q: What is The Suicide Squad? 

A: The Suicide Squad is a team of supervillains from the DC comic universe. They are led by covert operative Amanda Waller (Viola Davis) and Colonel Rick Flag (Joel Kinnaman). They recruit incarcerated meta-humans for impossible missions in the service of “national security.” Over the years, comics writers have used the Suicide Squad as a way to recycle crappy, one-off bad guys. This film’s incarnation includes Bloodsport (Idris Elba), Peacemaker (John Cena), Ratcatcher 2 (Daniela Melchior), King Shark (Sylvester Stallone), Polka-Dot Man (David Dastmalchian), and the legitimately popular Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie). 

Q: Polka-Dot Man? What does he do, shoot polka dots?

A: Yes.

Q: Didn’t this movie come out a long time ago? 

A: You’re thinking of Suicide Squad, which was released in 2016. 

Q: So this is a rerelease? 

A: No, this is The Suicide Squad.

Q: Exactly. It’s the same movie.

A: No, the 2016 film directed by David Ayer was called Suicide Squad. This 2021 film directed by James Gunn is The Suicide Squad. See the difference? 

Q: Not really. 

A: This one begins with “The.” 

Q: Ahhh. That’s … stupid. Couldn’t they have called it The Rise of Suicide Squad or Suicide Squad: Something Rises

A: Yes, those do sound like better titles. Especially these days when everything rises, like Dark Knight Rises or The Rise of Skywalker. But that’s not what Warner Bros. and DC opted for. 

Q: Why not? 

A: Look, I think you’re getting too hung up on this. I don’t know why they chose a bad title, but I do have a lot more information to impart about The Suicide Squad

Polka-Dot Man (David Dastmalchian), Peacemaker (John Cena), Bloodsport (Idris Elba), and Ratcatcher 2 (Daniela Melchior) get ready to kill a whole bunch of people.

Q: Does something rise? 

A: Yes, Starro rises. It’s a giant starfish from space that craps out starfish facehuggers, which make people into starfish zombies. 

Q: A giant starfish? That doesn’t sound like a scary supervillain.  

A: In Starro’s defense, it is very large. But like I said, The Suicide Squad is a dumping ground for bad ideas. Starro is so notoriously lame, Alan Moore made fun of it in Watchmen with the giant space squid Ozymandias teleports into New York City.  

Q: I never realized that was satire. 

A: Everything in Watchmen is satire. But we’re talking about The Suicide Squad

King Shark (Sylvester Stallone) takes a break.

Q: Right. So, if they’re all bad guys, why are the Suicide Squad fighting Starro?

A: The government sends the squad on a mission to Corto Maltese, an island nation where a military coup led by Luna (Juan Diego Botto) is threatening world peace with a secret super weapon, which turns out to be Starro. 

Q: So who are the good guys? 

A: There are no good guys. 

Starro tearing up the club.

Q: I thought James Gunn worked for Marvel. Didn’t he direct Guardians of the Galaxy

A: Yes, but back in the Dark Times of 2018, some alt-right jerk-offs got Gunn fired from Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 after he criticized Trump. Warner Bros. scooped him up, and here we are. 

Q: That’s terrible! Will we ever see Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3

A: Yes, Gunn got rehired after everyone cooled off and figured out the whole thing was dumb. 

Q: So, is The Suicide Squad any good? 

A: Well, it’s better than Suicide Squad, a movie so terrible it was actually edited by a company called Trailer Park, Inc., who specializes in cutting film trailers. 

Q: That’s a pretty low bar to clear. What is it like? 

A: Remember that scene in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, when Yondu the Ravager uses his remote-controlled arrow weapon to slaughter an entire spaceship crew, while grooving to the smooth bossa nova sounds of “Come a Little Bit Closer,” and you were like, “Wow, this is a little too brutal for a kid’s movie”? All of The Suicide Squad is like that.

Q: Sounds like Gunn really phoned it in. 

A: Pretty much. It has its moments, and it’s not as tedious as the Zack Snyder DC films, but it feels completely unnecessary. It says something that, with this and Birds of Prey, DC does villains better than heroes. Or maybe it’s just the Margot Robbie factor. 

Q: Haven’t you done this FAQ schtick before? 

A: Yes, but since DC and Warner Bros. can’t be bothered to come up with new ideas, why should I try? 

Categories
News News Feature

A Beginner’s Guide to the WWE.

Maybe you are good Southern rasslin’ kin, strong of gait and wild of tongue, versed in all things WWE. Maybe you were raised ringside, held high upon your father’s shoulders as he shouted, “This is a total schmoz! Get those mid-carders out of here!” You are the sort of man or woman who knows The Rock from a rock. A dead man from The Deadman.

If the above is true, stop reading now. This article is meant for those gentler readers who heard that the nation’s largest pro-wrestling franchise (now worth over a billion American smackeroos) will be in town this weekend and thought, “Wrestling? But isn’t that, like, fake and stuff?”

The short answer is yes, wrestling is fake. Vince McMahon, WWE’s ancient but somehow totally ripped CEO, declared it to be fake in 1989 before a New Jersey court, in a successful effort to get the sport deregulated. But to call it fake is to gloss over how much of pro wrestling is real: lives lost, noses broken, careers ruined or made. Sure, the punches are choreographed, but the forces that drive that choreography are a Shakespearean negotiation between gimmicky theatrics, audience participation, and “legit” athleticism. The fights aren’t fake so much as they are actively symbolic of an ever-shifting compromise between public desire and what “the Authority” thinks will make money. You know, like politics.

Ian Harkey

Except wrestling is far more pure than politics. It is about nothing but the celebrity of the wrestlers. The sport does not involve famous people; fame is the sport. Wrestling isn’t about celebrity. It actually is celebrity, inscribed in symbolic physical form. To quote the essayist John Jeremiah Sullivan, “The purity of that!”

For your guidance, here is a brief and randomly selected glossary of professional wrestling lingo.

Ian Harkey

Kayfabe: The pretense that anything in professional wrestling is real. Wrestlers used to have to maintain their beefs in the ring and out of it, but now that we are in the “reality era” of wrestling, what’s really real is communicated as much through reality shows, social media, and podcasts as anything else. Reality proliferates.

Legit: Pro wrestling that is actually real. You could say current superstars Brie and Nikki Bella are “legit twins” rather than make-believe siblings, as is the case with many in-ring alliances.

Babyface: a good guy; someone the crowd is supposed to like. (See: John Cena, the cherubically corn-fed world champion who recently appeared alongside Amy Schumer in Judd Apatow’s Trainwreck.)

The Spanish announcer table: The table that wrestlers most commonly destroy mid-match. It has been broken so many times the WWE calls it “The Spanish announce table Massacre.”

Jobber: A wrestler who routinely loses matches to up-and-coming stars, in order to grow those stars’ credibility. “A jobber to the stars” is sort of a glorified jobber.

Crimson mask: A face covered in blood. A face covered in blood! If someone purposefully bashes their head into barbed wire for greater dramatic effect, is the pain still real? As infamously pain-insensitive wrestler Mick Foley (aka Mankind) once said, “It’s not like I sit at home and miss being hit by chairs. It’s just something I think I do well.”

If you’re going to start somewhere with wrestling, you might as well start with The Undertaker. There is little to no chance that the veteran wrestler — known variously as The Deadman, The Master of Pain, Dice Morgan, The Punisher, American Bad Ass, The Commando and Texas Red — will appear this weekend in Memphis. But he unquestionably has one of the best gimmicks of all time, as a zombified Big Man whose longtime manager was a histrionic ghoul named Paul Bearer (get it?), and who regularly drags opponents into the beyond. His last major appearance was during WWE SummerSlam, where he faced off with Brock Lesnar, wearing eyeliner and shaking with posthumous strength.

Pro-wrestling freshmen, go back and watch The Undertaker fight Jake “The Snake” Roberts (a man whose tortured life is well-documented in the 1999 documentary Beyond the Mat). Then watch him in a Casket match, a Body Bag match, a Buried Alive match, a Rest in Peace match, a Hell in a Cell match, and a Last Ride match. Then, gentle reader, ask yourself: Are we having fun yet?

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Trainwreck vs. Ant-Man

Last weekend’s box office race involved two seeming opposites: Marvel’s Ant-Man and Trainwreck, the collaboration between comedy titans Amy Schumer and Judd Apatow. But after a Sunday double feature of the two films, I was struck by their similarities and what they say about the current risk-averse environment in Hollywood.

Ant-Man stars Paul Rudd as Scott Lang, a former electrical engineer whom we first meet as he is being released from San Quentin, where he was doing time for a Robin-Hood robbery of his corrupt former employer. His wife Maggie (Judy Greer) has divorced him and is living with their daughter, Cassie (Abby Ryder Fortson) and her new boyfriend, Paxton (Bobby Cannavale). Scott tries to go straight, but after he’s fired from his job at Baskin-Robbins, in one of the more creative product placement sequences in recent memory, he takes his friend Luis (Michael Peña) up on his idea to break into a Victorian mansion and clean out a mysterious basement vault.

But, as the comic book fates would have it, the mansion is the home of one Dr. Hank Pym (Michael Douglas), an old-school superscientist who discovered a way to reduce the space between atoms and thus shrink himself down to the size of an insect. For years, he and his wife operated in secret as a superteam of Ant-Man and the Wasp. After a desperate mission for S.H.I.E.L.D. to stop World War III, she disappeared into subatomic space, and he took off his supersuit and vowed to keep the world-changing and potentially dangerous technology under wraps.

Under Pym’s tutelage, Scott sets out to stop the scientist’s former protegee Darren Cross (Corey Stoll) from selling his own version of the shrinking technology to the evil forces of Hydra by stealing a high-tech Iron Man-type suit called the Yellowjacket.

Ant-Man is not as good as this year’s other Marvel offering, Avengers: Age Of Ultron, but it scores points for originality. Written by Attack the Block‘s Joe Cornish and Scott Pilgrim vs. the World‘s Edgar Wright, who was originally slated to direct, the film tries — and mostly succeeds — to combine an Ocean‘s Eleven-style heist flick with a superhero story in the same tonal range as Tim Burton’s 1989 Batman. It’s burdened with the traditional origin-story baggage, but the sequence where Scott discovers the powers of the Ant-Man supersuit by shrinking himself in the bathtub and fleeing running water, hostile insects, and a vacuum cleaner is another triumph for special effects wizards Industrial Light & Magic. Rudd, a veteran of many Apatow comedies, including Knocked Up, is exactly the right guy to sell the mix of comedy and superheroics, and some sparks fly with furtive love interest Evangeline Lilly as Pym’s double agent daughter Hope van Dyne. For the sections of its 117-minute running time when it’s focusing on its core plot, Ant-Man is a good time at the movies.

For Trainwreck, Amy Schumer’s vehicle for transforming basic cable stardom into a feature film career, she surrounded herself with some very heavy hitters. First and foremost is Apatow, the producer, director, and writer with his fingers in everything from The 40-Year-Old Virgin to Girls. The pair execute Schumer’s first feature-length screenplay with verve. Schumer stars as Amy, a New York magazine journalist who is basically a fleshed-out version of her public persona. In a sharp inversion of the usual romantic comedy formula, she is a quick-witted, commitment-phobic hookup artist dating a hunky man-bimbo named Steven (John Cena), who just wants to get married, settle down, and raise a basketball team’s worth of sons in a house in the country. Soon after her chronic infidelity torpedoes her relationship, she is assigned to write about a prominent sports doctor named Aaron (Bill Hader), who counts LeBron James among his patients. The two hit it off, and she soon violates her “never sleep over” rule with him.

If this were a traditional Rom-Com, and Amy’s character were male and played by, say, Tim Meadows (who is one of the dozens of comedic talents who have cameos), I would be calling him a ladies man. Schumer is practically daring people to expose the double standard by calling her a slut. Her effortless performance proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that she has chops to carry a feature film. Apatow is savvy enough to give her a long leash, giving her scenes time to breathe, selecting some choice improvs, and letting barrages of comic exchanges live in two-shots. Hadler finds himself in the unfamiliar role of the straight man to Schumer’s cutup, but he acquits himself well in what is essentially the Meg Ryan role from When Harry Met Sally. Practically everyone in the film’s supporting hoard of comics and sports figures also gives a good turn. Tilda Swinton is stiletto sharp as Dianna, Amy’s conscience-free magazine editor boss. Dave Attell is consistently funny as a homeless man who acts as Amy’s Greek chorus. Daniel Radcliffe and Marisa Tomei slay as the leads in a black-and-white art film called The Dogwalker that the film’s characters keep trying to watch. Matthew Broderick, Marv Albert, and tennis superstar Chris Evert share a funny scene. But the biggest surprise is LeBron James, who shines with confidence and humor every time he’s on the screen. For the sections of its 124-minute running time that it focuses on Amy’s romantic foibles, Trainwreck is a good time at the movies.

But that’s the rub for both Ant-Man and Trainwreck. They both spend way too much time straying from what an M.B.A. would call their “core competencies.” In the case of Ant-Man, the distractions are twofold. First is the now-predictable, awkward shoehorning of scenes intended to connect the film to the larger cinematic universe. As his first test, Pym assigns Scott to steal a technological bauble from a S.H.I.E.L.D warehouse, prompting a superclash between Ant-Man and fellow Marvel C-lister Falcon (Anthony Mackie). The allegedly vital piece of equipment is never mentioned again.

Second is the turgid subplot involving Scott’s efforts to reconnect with his daughter Cassie, and her would-be stepfather Paxton’s attempts to put him back in jail. When Scott is having trouble using Pym’s ant-control technology, Hope tells him to concentrate on how much he wants to reunite with his daughter. The moment rings completely false in context: If you’re trying to talk to ants, shouldn’t you be concentrating on ants? The intention seems to be to make Scott a more sympathetic character, but Rudd’s quick-quipping charisma makes that unnecessary. Why spend the time on flimsy sentiment when we can be playing to Ant-Man’s strengths?

Similarly, Trainwreck gets bogged down in a superfluous subplot involving Amy’s sister Kim (Brie Larson) and their father Gordon (Colin Quinn). It starts promisingly enough in the very first scene of the movie when Gordon explains to young Kim and Amy why he and their mother are getting a divorce (“Do you love your doll? How would you like it if you could only play with that one doll for the rest of your life?”). But then, we flash forward to the present day, and Gordon has been admitted to an assisted living facility, which becomes a source of friction between the sisters. Quinn is woefully miscast as a disabled old man, especially when he’s sitting next to veteran actor and actual old man Norman Lloyd. The subplot is seemingly there only for cheap sentiment, and it drags on and on, adding an unacceptable amount of running time to what should be a fleetly paced comedy. As we left the theater, my wife overheard a woman asking her friend how the film was. “I like it okay,” she said. “I thought it was never going to end, though.”

When Ant-Man is kicking pint-sized ass and Amy Schumer is schticking it up, their respective movies crackle with life. Hollywood is filled with smart people, and I can’t believe that an editor didn’t point out that the films could be improved by excising their phony sentimental scenes. So why didn’t these films achieve greatness? I submit it is another symptom of the studio’s increasingly crippling risk aversion. All films must be all things to all audiences to hit the so-called “four quadrants” of old and young, male and female, so raunchy comedies get extraneous schmaltz and lightweight comic book movies get weighed down with irrelevant family drama. Both Ant-Man and Trainwreck end up like rock albums with lackluster songwriting filled with killer guitar solos. They’re entertaining enough but haunted by the greatness that could have been.

Ant-Man
Now showing
Multiple locations

Trainwreck
Now showing
Multiple locations