Categories
Politics Politics Feature

McCain to Pick Fred Smith for Veep? Sez Who?

Yep. This is what it will look like (click photo to enlarge):

And this is how Miz Marsha explained it to Larry King (since he asked) on Monday night:

Larry King: By the way, congresswoman Blackburn, do
you have a favorite for vice president?

Rep. Marsha Blackburn: Well, I think that one of the
things that you’re going to see with the McCain decision — this is just my
own, my own speculation — is that he will choose a non-traditional candidate.
And I think…

Larry (grasping the thread): Like?

Marsha (forging ahead): … that he will make a
late decision. It would not surprise me to see a female. It would not surprise
me to see a person of color. It would not surprise me to see a businessman –
maybe someone like Fred Smth, who is the head of FedEx, who knows how to run a
business. I think that you’re going to see somebody outside of the box. McCain
has always been a maverick, and I think you’re going to see that come through as
he chooses a running mate.

Watch it below:

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Privileged Information

PITTSBURGH — Campaigning for wife Hillary Clinton on Monday, the eve of this week’s crucial Pennsylvania primary, former president Bill Clinton left little doubt about his own positive read of her controversial ABC debate last week with rival Barack Obama. This was an affair that numerous critics blasted as little more than an orgy of “gotcha” questions — directed by co-hosts George Stephanopoulos and Charlie Gibson to Obama, for the most part.

The former president, however, boasted to a large crowd gathered in Pittsburgh’s Market Square downtown about “that one great debate where Hillary showed us she was ready to be president of the United States.”

Warming up the audience for the candidate herself, whose campaign plane had been delayed, prospective first husband Clinton recalled daughter Chelsea Clinton‘s recent affirmative answer to a questioner who asked whether she thought her mother would make a better president than her father had.

“I took a world of kidding,” Clinton said. “At first, I tried to make light of it, saying, ‘Did you ever see a family where the women didn’t stick together?’ … Then I gave a serious answer. I agreed with my daughter. I think she is the best candidate I have ever come across.” Had she not been yoked in service to his own political career for so long, “she’d have been here earlier,” the former president insisted.

Later, after candidate Clinton had arrived and addressed the crowd, the two of them worked opposite sections of the semicircular rope line.

The former president headed our way. Asked about his wife’s prospects in what was for her a must-win primary, he said, “I think she’s in pretty good shape out there. They like her here. They know she’s their girl.” But he declined to make predictions about numbers.

“I don’t know,” he said. “She’s been outspent 3 to 1. And, you know, they were dancing on her grave in Texas. She won anyway. And they never thought, after they outspent her 2 to 1 in Ohio, she could still win by 10 points. So we’ll see. She’s got a lot of good supporters here. It depends on a lot of things. It depends on how the undecided break. I literally don’t know. … That’s not my job. My job is to get her as many votes as I can.”

I asked Clinton about the weekend endorsement of his wife for this week’s primary by Richard Mellon Scaife, the conservative owner and publisher of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and the principal architect and paymaster (to the tune of several million dollars) of what Hillary Clinton once famously called a “vast right-wing conspiracy” to embarrass and bring down her husband.

“I’m surprised,” the former president answered, “but I take him at their word. I think they were impressed that she had the guts to go see ’em. And, you know, I generally find this, that people who demonize you, once they get to know you, they’re surprised you’re different than they imagined. And they like her. She made a lot of sense, and I take them at their word.”

He declined to speculate on whether his wife could expect an endorsement in the general election against Republican John McCain.

The Clintons’ visit was followed by one later Monday by Obama, who drew a massive crowd at an evening rally at the University of Pittsburgh, where the candidate was accompanied by his wife Michelle Obama, by Pennsylvania senator Bob Casey, who has endorsed Obama, and by Teresa Heinz Kerry, the widow of former Pennsylvania senator John Heinz who is currently married to Massachusetts senator, former presidential candidate, and Obama supporter John Kerry.

• Perhaps doing duty to the “equal time” concept, ABC’s Stephanopoulos followed up the Democratic debate by roughing up GOP candidate McCain during a Sunday interview on This Week.

Citing an article in that day’s Washington Post which depicted McCain as irascible and recounted several incidents of feuds with Senate colleagues, Stephanopoulos forced the Arizona senator on the defensive about his temperament.

For what it’s worth, one of McCain’s Republican colleagues in the Senate, Tennessee’s own Lamar Alexander, was asked, on the occasion of his recent visit to the Flyer, if he had ever been on the receiving end of one of McCain’s outbursts.

“Yes, I have,” the senator nodded gravely, going on to say, “There are very few of us who haven’t.”

Jackson Baker

Categories
News The Fly-By

Fly on the Wall

Inflatable Elvis

Every year, as Elvis Week approaches, journalists around the globe begin reflecting on the man behind the myth. Invariably, some of them take a cheap shot at Presley, who was undeniably one of the 20th century’s most compelling personalities. The cheap shots often take the form of “fat jokes,” reminding us that Presley — whose mere presence caused teenage girls to faint — liked to eat.

An article in Time magazine (echoing an article in the New England Journal of Medicine) recently put forward the notion that your friends can “make you fat.” As proof, the author wrote, “Elvis made everyone around him fatter, to judge by photographs of the Memphis Mafia — entourage members expanding and contracting like a bellows in time with their boss.”

Canadian Business online recently opined about workplaces where older, more experienced employees report to young, inexperienced managers who “think Elvis was born fat.”

Of course, there’s something inherently campy about the image of a bloated Elvis crammed into a form-fitting jumpsuit. But, in addition to it being a lazy writer’s cliché, reminding people that Elvis was briefly fat is a little like mocking Albert Einstein for his perpetual bed-head.

NCREDIBLE

What do Senator John McCain and Justin Timberlake have in common? They are both male. Both have two arms, two legs, and a single head. Both have achieved a certain level of fame. Beyond that, comparisons become more difficult. Nevertheless, during a recent debate between Republican presidential candidates, McCain was asked if he was in favor of Timberlake’s campaign to bring sexy back. Unflapped by the silly question, McCain said, “It depends on whether or not he endorses me.” The famously individualistic senator then added that he and Timberlake shared a number of “attributes.”

Categories
News The Fly-By

The Cheat Sheet

Ophelia Ford admits that she has a permit to carry a handgun. In a typically rambling statement to reporters, she claims she got a gun because she had a “paranoid schizophrenic crazy” husband. As a result, “he’s my bed partner.” We think she was talking about the gun. But she divorced that husband, and then “I put the honey away.” Again, we think she was talking about the gun. And we think we’ve found the new spokesperson for the National Rifle Association.

Greg Cravens

Eighteen years ago, Rickey Peete resigned from the City Council in the face of an extortion scandal — accused of taking bribes handed to him under the table (literally) at a Shoney’s. Last week, Peete resigned again, again following a scandal, and again involving bribes. He rebounded from that first conviction with a re-Peete. Let’s hope we skip a three-Peete.

Robert F.X. Sillerman, who owns the majority of Elvis Presley’s estate, announces that he wants to spend $250 million to upgrade Graceland and the surrounding area, as just one step in his plan to double attendance at the mansion. Sillerman’s company, CKX, also owns the rights to Muhammad Ali and American Idol, so the man obviously knows a thing or two about marketing. But if it involves that Sanjaya fellow, then we want nothing to do with it.

Presidential hopeful John McCain visits Memphis and drops a hint that, if elected president, he wouldn’t mind having a rather well-known Memphian named Fred Smith as a member of his cabinet. No word yet on how Smith feels about that, but quite frankly, we need him here to run FedEx.

Arun Gandhi, grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, announces he will move his M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence from Memphis to Rochester, New York. Considering all the crime in this city recently, who can blame him?

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

McCain Redux

The man who electrified much of the nation early in 2000 while running for president made Memphis the stage on Monday for what was billed as the unveiling of his economic program as part of a second campaign for the presidency.

Speaking at the University of Memphis Holiday Inn before an overflow audience of Economics Club members and other spectators, Arizona senator John McCain espoused traditionally conservative fiscal views and promised, if elected, not “to waste money” or “to let the government get in the way of making an honest dollar.”

McCain’s laissez-faire approach to economics also included pledges to restrict government entitlements, to revamp an “unsustainable” Social Security system, to reform the nation’s tax structure, and to oppose protectionist measures, advocating job-retraining programs for laid-off workers in obsolescent industries.

All in all, it was a relatively restrained performance that earned respectful attention and applause from an audience that included FedEx founder (and McCain supporter) Fred Smith, who introduced the candidate, former Texas senator Phil Gramm, and current 9th District congressman Steve Cohen.

McCain still gives off flashes of the candid, irreverent self that, early in the presidential campaign season of 2000, captivated voters across the political spectrum. In a media session with reporters following his ballroom speech, the senator made a point of being courtly, shaking hands with as many of the media attendees as possible.

Asked about his relatively dismal fund-raising so far (he is in third place in Republican ranks, behind both Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani), the senator said flatly, “Because I didn’t do a better job.” Asked why that was, McCain answered, “Because I’m not competent enough, I guess.”

It was hard to tell whether he was being tongue-in-cheek or merely stating a hard, if unpleasant, fact. He followed that up with the bland-sounding assurance that things were “moving forward” and that he was “very happy with where our campaign is today.”

Under the circumstances, it was impossible not to recall a prediction made at Rhodes College two weeks ago by veteran Democratic pol James Carville, who included among a series of predictions for the campaign year his guess that McCain’s presidential candidacy would be over with by the time of the Iowa caucuses in early 2008.

“He looks tired,” Carville had said. “He’s trying to be an establishment guy but can’t play the role. He hasn’t raised any money, and the Republicans don’t care for him.”

If “tired” was arguably too strong a word to describe McCain during his Memphis appearance, then certainly he appeared relatively unanimated. Perhaps that was due merely to the subject matter he had resolved to focus on (they don’t call economics “the dry science” for nothing). And his Economics Club address had after all been closer to a lecture appearance than a campaign rally.

But there was some ghost of the past that was playing in Monday’s scenario, as well. There was just the slightest shadow there of presidential candidate Bob Dole, circa 1996. Eight years earlier, Dole had run as the straight-talking alternative to his party’s status quo, and he won the Iowa caucuses over the favored Republican candidate, then vice president George Herbert Walker Bush.

A week later, though, Dole’s momentum had been stopped in New Hampshire by a concentrated slash-and-burn attack from Bush that caused Dole to lament that his adversary was “lying about my record.” Bush won big there and went on to gain the Republican nomination and the presidency.

Dole did not resurface as a presidential candidate until eight years later, when he’d made himself a loyal soldier of the Bush administration and, after getting the nomination, ran unsuccessfully as the GOP establishment candidate against the incumbent president, Democrat Bill Clinton.

With the exception that McCain has so far been running behind in his nomination race and that (consistent with Carville’s judgment) he seems still not to have gained much traction with his party’s establishment, McCain’s rerun, eight years after his first presidential try, has an uncanny resemblance to Dole’s experience.

In 2000, the reform-minded McCain, who won New Hampshire in a breeze, seemed almost to rise above issues of party and ideology. He was badly trashed by a disinformation campaign in South Carolina, however, and never quite regained his footing against George W. Bush, son of the former president, who, like his father, went on to win both the GOP nomination and the presidency.

McCain’s response over the next eight years was the same as Dole’s had been — to hunker down and prove himself loyal to the man who had beat him. In McCain’s case, that has included becoming the staunchest defender of the Iraq war at a time when national sentiment has clearly been running against it.

Though he was careful not to minimize the precarious and dangerous state of things in Iraq at the moment, the senator expressed both continued commitment to the military effort there and guarded optimism about the current “surge” effort.

It is too early to pronounce judgment on McCain’s chances in 2008, but the reminders of Dole’s experience are certainly there — even in the slightly cramped posture of the Arizona senator, the heroic survivor of long imprisonment and torture in North Vietnam.

Like Dole, wounded badly during World War Two and partly crippled as a result, McCain wears his heroic personal history — and his pain — in his very being. It remains to be seen how close the parallels to Dole’s political fate will be.

• Meeting in caucus last Thursday, the Democratic members of the Shelby County legislative delegation selected the three Democrats who will serve on the county Election Commission: They are (in order of votes received): Shep Wilbun, holder of several previous public offices; Myra Stiles, a longtime former commissioner; and O.C. Pleasant, holdover from the current commission and another longtime member.

Pleasant, who served as Election Commission chairman for many years, was tied with another aspirant, Joe Young, before Democratic Senate leader Jim Kyle broke the tie in the incumbent commissioner’s favor. The three commissioners-to-be were selected from among an original field of 15 applicants, who were narrowed down to five finalists the week before last. The two Republican commissioners, Nancy Hines and Rich Holden, are returning.

• Circuit Court judge D’Army Bailey is one of three jurists nominated by the state Judicial Selection Commission as prospective members to fill a vacancy in the Tennessee Supreme Court left by the retirement of Justice Adolfo Birch. The other nominees are Judges William Koch of Nashville and Creed McGinley of Savannah.

Governor Phil Bredesen had rejected the first group of candidates sent him by the commission last year as well as a second list that included a holdover from the first group. The state Supreme Court would eventually sustain Bredesen’s insistence on seeing a new list with all new names, and the current list is the result.

Bredesen has promised to name off the candidates from the list, and Bailey’s chances are rated as being good, based on the fact that he, like Birch, is an African American, and some believe the seat should be reserved for a black jurist.

• Another Memphis-based judge to receive a signal distinction of late is U.S. district judge Bernice Donald, who was recently named secretary-elect of the American Bar Association. Donald will be the first African American to become an officer of the A.B.A. if her nomination is approved, as expected, at the organization’s August convention in San Francisco.

Categories
Opinion The Last Word

The Rant

Iraqis and Americans alike were stunned by the audacity of Senator John McCain’s heavily publicized (and heavily armed) excursion through Baghdad’s Shorja market last weekend. There was the leading proponent of the war on Capitol Hill, setting out to confirm his recent claim that the escalation of U.S. forces is greatly improving conditions on the ground, accompanied by a handful of congressional colleagues. He seemed to think nobody would notice that their little shopping trip also included a platoon of soldiers, three Black Hawk choppers, and two Apache gunships.

Neither the Iraqi merchants used as props in this strange exercise nor the American voters who were its intended targets could possibly have been deceived by such a charade. So the question that inevitably arises is whether McCain & Co. are still attempting to dupe us — or whether they have finally duped themselves.

Consider the happy talk from Representative Mike Pence, an ultraconservative Indiana Republican who has visited Iraq on several occasions. At the press conference that inevitably followed the Shorja photo op, Pence said he had been inspired by the opportunity to “mix and mingle unfettered among ordinary Iraqis,” drinking tea and haggling over carpets. To him, the Baghdad shops were “like a normal outdoor market in Indiana in the summertime.” Senator Lindsey Graham, another McCain sidekick, boasted of buying “five rugs for five bucks,” marveling that “just a few weeks ago, hundreds of people, dozens of people were killed in the same place.”

Then they climbed back into the armored vehicles that served as their tourist buses and returned to the Green Zone.

Aside from the theatrics of the Shorja excursion, however, the message delivered by McCain, Graham, and Pence was scarcely different from what each of them usually says after visiting Iraq. In February 2005, for instance, when McCain made his famous trip with Senator Hillary Clinton, he claimed to believe that “the dynamic [of the war] has changed from Iraqi insurgents versus the U.S. … to Iraqi insurgents versus the Iraqi government.” Back then, he declared himself “far more optimistic” than he had previously felt, adding: “I think we have an opportunity to succeed.”

According to McCain, there is always an opportunity to succeed, provided that we are willing to sacrifice more young Americans and hundreds of billions more dollars. But then again, this is a man who thinks we didn’t expend enough lives and dollars in Vietnam — although he would be hard-pressed to explain why the world would be better today if 100,000 Americans and another million Vietnamese had died in that war.

As for Pence, the only conceivable purpose of his latest trip was to pick up those rugs. His sunny comments were as predictable this time as when he visited Iraq in September 2005, when he told The Indianapolis Star that spending two days there had convinced him the United States was “winning the war.” General John Abizaid, then the commander of U.S. forces, had assured him there was a viable plan and that the plan was working, all of which Pence dutifully repeated to the folks back home.

On this trip, none of these jolly politicians mentioned the rise in killings across Iraq during the past month. None of them even seemed aware that the temporary reduction of violence in Baghdad appears to have driven even greater carnage outside the capital — such as the bombing in Kirkuk that slaughtered a group of schoolgirls the same day that Graham and Pence got their bargain carpets.

Even if the “surge” succeeds in suppressing violence in Baghdad for a few weeks or months by pouring in tens of thousands of American troops, what would that mean? Do McCain and his colleagues actually believe that we can somehow provide enough soldiers and Marines to achieve the pacification of every city and town in Iraq? If so, how long would our troops be expected to police the terrorist incidents and revenge attacks that now occur every day in this civil war?

Congressional hawks like McCain echo President Bush’s complaint that the Democrats are undermining the war by seeking to set a date for an American withdrawal. They insist that the war’s critics should simply shut up and send more money and more soldiers while we see whether this “plan” works better than the previously discarded plans.

But the truth is that the president and his echoes are merely playing for time with American lives. They have no plan because there is no military solution to this war. The war propaganda doesn’t work any better than the war plan — which is why the Democrats have been emboldened and why McCain’s presidential prospects are rapidly declining.

Joe Conason writes for Salon and The New York Observer.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

“Making Progress”

The media spectacle that Arizona senator John McCain made of himself in Baghdad on April 1st was simply another reprise of an old and ghastly ritual. McCain expressed “very cautious optimism” and told reporters that the latest version of the U.S. war effort in Iraq is “making progress.”

Three years ago, in early April 2004, when an insurrection exploded in numerous Iraqi cities, U.S. occupation spokesman Dan Senor informed journalists: “We have isolated pockets where we are encountering problems.” Nine days later, President George W. Bush declared: “It’s not a popular uprising. Most of Iraq is relatively stable.”

For government officials committed to a war based on lies, such claims are in the wiring.

When Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara visited Vietnam for the first time in May 1962, he came back saying that he’d seen “nothing but progress and hopeful indications of further progress in the future.”

In October 1966, when McNamara held a press conference at Andrews Air Force Base after returning from another trip to Vietnam, he spoke of the progress he’d seen there. Then-military analyst Daniel Ellsberg recalls that McNamara made that presentation “minutes after telling me that everything was much worse than the year before.”

Despite the recent “surge” in the kind of media hype that McCain was trying to boost in Baghdad, this spring has begun with most news coverage still indicating that the war is going badly for American forces in Iraq. Some pundits say that U.S. military fortunes there during the next few months will determine the war’s political future in Washington. And opponents of the war often focus their arguments on evidence that an American victory is not possible.

But shifts in the U.S. military role on the ground in Iraq, coupled with the Pentagon’s air war escalating largely out of media sight, could enable the war’s promoters to claim a notable reduction of “violence.” And the American death toll could fall due to reconfiguration or reduction of U.S. troop levels inside Iraq.

Such a combination of developments would appeal to the fervent nationalism of U.S. news media. But the antiwar movement shouldn’t pander to jingo-narcissism. If we argue that the war is bad mainly because of what it is doing to Americans, then what happens when the Pentagon finds ways to cut American losses — while continuing to inflict massive destruction on Iraqi people?

American news outlets will be inclined to depict the Iraq war as winding down when fewer Americans are dying in it. That happened during the last several years of the Vietnam War, while massive U.S. bombing — and Vietnamese deaths — continued unabated.

The vast bulk of the U.S. media is in the habit of defining events around the world largely in terms of what’s good for the U.S. government — through the eyes of top officials in Washington. Routinely, the real lives of people are noted only as shorthand for American agendas. The political spin of the moment keeps obscuring the human element.

Awakening from a 40-year nap, an observer might wonder how much has changed since the last war that the United States stumbled over because it could not win. The Congressional Record is filled with insistence that the lessons of Vietnam must not be forgotten. But they cannot be truly remembered if they were never learned in the first place.

Norman Solomon’s latest book is War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.