Categories
Opinion The BruceV Blog

Election Results Give Reason for Optimism

It’s been a long time since I woke on the day after an election in Shelby County feeling as optimistic and grateful as I do today. Let me count the ways:

First, my state senator, the mentally and physically impaired embarrassment, Ophelia Ford, was soundly defeated in the Democratic primary by Lee Harris, a smart, young law school professor with, I suspect, a bright political future hereabouts. This was the result I wanted most from this election cycle. Win.

Across the state in Knoxville, GOP primary voters turned out in droves to demolish the re-election bid of lunatic state senator Stacey Campfield, aka “Mr. Don’t Say Gay.” Thanks, Knoxville. Love ya. For grins, check out Campfield’s reaction to his defeat on his blog.

Perhaps the result that surprised me most was the defeat, statewide, of Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey’s attempted purge of three Tennessee Supreme Court justices. The upshot: Ron spent a few hundred thousand dollars to let Tennesseans know the names of three Supreme Court justices. Epic fail. Couldn’t happen to a sleazier jackass. This vote, and Lamar Alexander’s victory over anti-immigration nut Joe Carr, gave me some real hope that the Tea Party tide may have finally turned in Tennessee. I hope so, anyway.

Joe Brown and Henri Brooks were resoundingly trounced in their races for attorney general and Juvenile Court clerk, respectively. I’ve had my issues with Brown’s opponent, Amy Weirich, but Brown, like Brooks, simply self-destructed, making Weirich the winner by default, and by a landslide.

To recount, Memphis purged itself of Ophelia Ford, and along with other Shelby County voters, soundly rejected two potential lightning rods/potential embarrassments for public office.

On the other hand, Germantown and Collierville re-elected self-promoting loon Brian Kelsay and public drunk Curry Todd to the state legislature — without opposition. Shades of Ophelia Ford. The next time you hear some suburbanite snarking on Memphis politicians, remind them to check their own backyard.

And I was glad to see Steve Cohen retain his 9th District Congressional seat. Some advice: If local Democrats want to win county-wide races, they would do well to figure out how to organize behind Cohen and his presidential support and national clout, instead of lobbing a futile and divisive primary challenge at him every two years. The muddle-headedness of the SCDP is self-defeating.

There also needs to be serious state legislation passed to crack down on the illicit fake “official ballot” business hereabouts. It’s scandalous. But, all in all, not bad results to wake up to, IMO.

Categories
Letter From The Editor Opinion

Letter From the Editor: Beach Ball of Death

We’ve all had those moments — the little beach ball starts spinning on your laptop, or your iPad screen freezes or, as happened to me yesterday, Siri wouldn’t respond to my request to text a friend. I knew the little minx was in there, but she stayed mum, no matter how hard I pressed the button to summon her.

When these things happen, I always remember the loving mantra of our company IT guy, who, when you ask about a computer malfunction, inevitably snarls: “It probably just needs to reboot. Did you restart it?” And rebooting works, almost every time. It even brought Siri back.

Which brings me to this: Here in Memphis and Shelby County, it’s time to reboot. Far too many of our political offices are held by spinning beach balls. Far too many of our candidates have no business running for public office.

In recent weeks, there has been a lot of strong political reporting hereabouts — by the Flyer‘s Jackson Baker (you should take his cover story from last week with you into the voting booth), and by reporters at the Commercial Appeal. If you’ve been paying attention to the reportage, you have learned that there are judges who don’t come to work on a regular basis; there are judges and judicial candidates with personal issues that should preclude them from any public office, much less that of a judgeship; there are candidates using extremely misleading political advertising, including a white judicial candidate whose ad includes a picture of a black endorsee next to his name. There are candidates and office-holders who don’t pay their taxes, who abuse women, who are racists, who shoot themselves in the foot every time they open their mouth, who are drunks and pill-heads and financial miscreants. Reboot!

The Ophelia Ford Show needs to be cancelled. The Henri Brooks Show is a bad rerun. Judge Joe Brown has fallen and can’t get up. Reboot. Reboot. Reboot. And it’s not just Democrats. Republicans also have their fair share of clowns and buffoons. Lieutenant Governor Ron Ramsey’s tawdry campaign to unseat three Tennessee Supreme Court judges is beyond shameful, filled with lies and bald-faced distortions.

This has nothing to do with race or party. There are dedicated public servants and qualified candidates of all political stripes and ethnicities. Keep and elect the good ones. Dump and defeat the self-entitled, self-important, and stupid ones.

I know taking the time to learn about all the candidates involves effort. I know it’s a long ballot and that voting can be inconvenient. But surely all sentient Shelby Countians can agree that a little inconvenience is well worth the pay-off: more honest and competent public servants; fewer fools, egomaniacs, and spinning beach balls.

Reboot.

Categories
Fly On The Wall Blog Opinion

Six Completely Screwed Up Things Judge Joe Brown Has Said About Women. And Men Who Act Like Women.

Joe & friends

  • Joe & friends

Politics is the ultimate reality show. That’s especially true in Memphis this election year thanks to the mud-slinging antics of former Judge turned TV arbitrator Joe Brown, who recently accused his political opponent, District Attorney Amy Weirich of being gay and in the closet. Brown’s subsequent apology for the attempted public shaming generously allows that gays have nothing to be ashamed of, blaming the victim of the intended gay smear because she doesn’t do more to support LGBT rights.

The only surprising thing about this dustup is that people were surprised. It’s not like Weirich is the first person Judge Joe has accused of being gay on the “down low.” Judge Joe’s long history as an arbiter of proper gender conduct suggests he has a serious problem with women, especially if they don’t have a man. Why you may ask? Because women without men raise boys who act like women, which more or less implies that there must be something wrong with the way women act in the first place. For fifteen seasons the celebrity judge presided over a make believe courtroom, slut-shaming and ball-busting his way to becoming America’s second favorite TV judge, just ahead of The People’s Court‘s Marilyn Milian, but well behind Judge Judy. But there’s a dirty little not-so-secret secret about popular courtroom programming. It’s nothing like an actual courtroom, and critics have long worried that it warps viewers’ sense of how our legal system actually works. The combative and openly biased behavior TV judges regularly engage in to score big on a daytime/late night reality shows would merit disciplinary action in the real world.

This is a gavel, which is sometimes called a skank hammer.

  • This is a gavel, which is sometimes called a “skank hammer.”

Court shows are typically confrontational reality TV, and that kind of programming has always trucked in manufactured drama, aggression, poorsploitation and heterosexist culture-bating. And like I said, when it came to bringing in the ratings, Judge Joe was always a big #2, swirling around the commode of trash television.

Here are just a few of the wacky things the tough-loving judge has said about women. And Men who act like women.

Poor Snidely Whiplash. He was probably raised in a single parent home without a man to teach him man things.

  • Poor Snidely Whiplash. He was probably raised in a single parent home without a man to teach him man things.

1. Men are Weak, Women are Weaker: Judge Joe Brown describes himself as a “Defender of Womanhood,” and a “Promoter of Manhood.” It’s practically the guy’s motto. And what’s wrong with defending womanhood and promoting manhood, anyway? Isn’t that chivalry, or something? It’s certainly Medieval, right?


The cast of the musical Camelot explains the true meaning of chivalry.

I’m not going to spend too much time with this because it’s pretty self-explanatory and the other entries are solid examples of just how screwed up an idea it is. By making this his mission Judge Joe is basically saying that women require a strong man to protect them from weaker men and also from intrinsic weaknesses of the feminine kind. When Joe talks about promoting manhood what he’s actually promoting is anti-girlishness in men.

2. Thugs are bad because they act like women and homosexuals aren’t strong role models: Judge Joe thinks men have “too many puny ‘role models.’” In April, 2012, at a “Men’s Day program” held in in the Hathaway-Howard Fine Arts Center on the Pine Bluff Campus of the University of Arkansas, he supported his unified puny dude theory by listing numerous examples of unmanly male role models: “prima donna” athletes, “uninformed” journalists, “self-serving” politicians, homosexuals in the entertainment industry,” and… wait, what? Why are homosexuals puny role models? And more importantly, what would “prima donna” athlete and openly gay defensive end Michael Sams have to say about that?

Clearly a gangbanger. Probably a woman.

  • Clearly a ‘gangbanger.” Probably a woman.

But wait, there’s more.

“Gangbangers and would-be thugs are really nothing but girls, not men,” he continued. “Boys with bling don’t have jobs because they think some woman somewhere will be silly enough to support them. It requires moral and physical courage to be a real man, and that’s why you need an education. People need your leadership.”

The shorter Joe: It takes moral and physical courage to not be a girl. Ladies, take note.

3. Pretty women are insecure and easier to deal with than ugly women: “I don’t deal with ugly women,” Judge Joe told some adoring fans one night after he had been drinking.


Beauty is only skin deep but life’s too short for ugly chicks.

A widely-shared video clip shows Brown seating young ladies on his knee and pontificating on the differences between pretty and ugly women. So why does Judge Joe prefer pretty girls? Because,““Pretty women are insecure,” and therefore easier to deal with.

Well duh! Anybody who’s ever tried to exploit somebody’s weakness for personal satisfaction knows that.

4. If you act gay, you’re gay. And it might be contagious: Once upon a time Cracked, the humor magazine turned online list-factory decided to infiltrate the weird world of cheaply-manufactured court TV. The storyline Cracked developed was irresistible: A man asked his friend to hire strippers for his bachelor party. Only the man hired male strippers and now the groom to be isn’t just single, he’s gay. Ridiculous, right? So ridiculous, in fact, that every major Hollywood courtroom wanted them.

Its possible that this list is a Cracked ripoff. Okay, this list is a Cracked ripoff

  • It’s possible that this list is a “Cracked” ripoff. Okay, this list is a “Cracked” ripoff

Cracked took its case to Judge Joe who, before ruling in favor of the plaintiff, attempted an outing of the defendant: “If you hired these people, obviously you might like what they have to offer…If there was a time for you to come out of the closet, this is the time for you to do it.” It’s unclear what bearing the defendant’s sexual orientation had on the case or the plaintiff’s amazing transformation.

1977244_10202541362398685_1893129136513610568_n.jpg

5. Single mothers are to blame for pretty much everything: A 15-year old male student accused of pushing a female classmate told Judge Joe he’d been called a “bitch.” Judge Joe’s response: “Maybe you were acting like one. Sounds like it to me. You’ve got earrings in your ears.”

Then Brown dressed down the boy’s mother: “You know what your problem is lady? Let’s get to you first so I’ll get it out of the way. There is no man in this boy’s life to give him man training. You’re the mother and you condone him going off and doing such physical injury to this young woman woman [cross talk]. Be quiet! [Crosstalk]. Now mam. He does not have a man in his life to give him man training. You take the position in writing that you condone what he did to this young lady… When there is no man in a boy’s life and his mother says his transgressions violently on other females is okay, where do I go from there but to say maybe, maybe what’s going on is because these single mothers with a lot of babies at home don’t want the man around, and then teach their sons to do the same bloody thing. And I’m looking at him with two earrings in his ears, and I’m listening to what she has said he was called, reading what the school report says and I’m thinking to myself that was a pretty apt description of this aggressive young girl over here. Not that one [the actual girl], the young girl standing to your left [the boy.]

Judge Joe, in the spirit of every schoolyard bully ever, called the teen boy a “sissy.” That was just the warm up for an epic rant about manliness and the failings of women. “You punk,” he continued. “You spineless, girl-acting, unmanly little cretin, what’s wrong with you? Then you’re gonna try to demonstrate some kind of attitude toward me? Roll your eyes? C’mon. Play girl. I’m getting a good demonstration. And you give me this nasty unmanly attitude about some young lady provoked you, using some language against you… Man’s got an obligation to protect womanhood. That has been my lifetime avocation. Protecting womanhood and promoting manhood.”

Hitting and pushing is troubling behavior. Seeding gender insecurity is clearly the solution!

6. If you don’t stand up straight you might be on the down low: After accusing a male defendant, whose activities had nothing to do with sex or sexuality of being potentially gay on the down low Judge Joe decided to stir the pot until it boiled. “What I used to see was, when there was a man standing at the podium, what he was doing was behaving in a certain way,” he said. “And I saw the young ladies and they would act in a certain way. And what’s interesting is over the last twelve years I’ve been doing this particular arbitration thing I’m doing right now, and considering [crosstalk]… Be quiet! The 20 years I have done this before I have noticed an interesting transition. The boys are beginning to act like the girls used to in terms of their body language, rolling eyes, head up, hand on hip, moving around. Women, since time immemorial have talked over someone who’s tried to address them and you are talking over me just like you are a woman. So when you start acting like one, sounding like one, moving like one, then I’m going to put it out there.”

Happens all the time.

  • Happens all the time.

After provoking the defendant in ways unbecoming in an actual courtroom and making presumptive comments about the defendant’s mother, Judge Joe called the LAPD to arrest the defendant for mirroring his own bad, womanly behavior.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Henri Brooks and Joe Brown: Beyond the Storm

If, for partisans of the Shelby County Democratic Party, the period just before the current month got under way was the calm before the storm, what has happened since has been the storm.

Believe it or not, there are several Democratic candidates on the county general election ballot — including Deidre Malone, the party’s candidate for Shelby county mayor, who is running an intelligent, well-conceived campaign involving several ad hoc support groups; and Cheyenne Johnson, the incumbent Shelby County assessor, who is widely regarded as having served effectively, and who proved her appeal to a general public with an impressive reelection win just two years ago.

But two other Democrats on the ballot have monopolized all the attention of late, effectively drawing it away from Malone, Johnson, and other Democratic nominees. Worse, most of the publicity attracted by those candidates — Henri Brooks, candidate for Juvenile Court clerk, and Joe Brown, candidate for district attorney general — has been negative.

To be sure, both Brooks and Brown have seen a closing of the ranks behind them of core supporters — backers of Brooks, especially, have been active, filling the County Commission’s interim meeting room on Monday, making it S.R.O. for yet another showdown on her residential status — but general elections in Shelby County are not won solely on the basis of partisan support.

And both Brooks and Brown seem to have burned more bridges than they have built to swing voters, despite what had initially seemed good prospects for expanding their bases.

Brooks, a term-limited county commissioner, began the election year on a wave of relative acclaim, having almost single-handedly forced the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate conditions at Juvenile Court and subsequently to mandate reforms in the court’s procedure. Really, all Brooks had to do to sustain good election chances was to make nice in the way of most candidates, doing at least minimal outreach beyond her African-American inner-city constituency.

Instead, she managed to alienate considerable numbers of white and Hispanic voters in the course of a stormy commission debate about minority contracting on county construction projects (one in which her rhetoric undercut the tenable logic of her case); incurred a misdemeanor assault charge in a needless wrangle over a parking-lot space; and, finally, was discovered not to be inhabiting her listed residence, leading to serious efforts by fellow commissioners to declare her ineligible to serve and to vacate her seat.

Brooks has so far come out ahead in a series of skirmishes on the residential matter. She won a declaratory judgment last week from Chancellor Kenny Armstrong invalidating County Attorney Marcy Ingram’s finding that Brooks’ seat should be vacated. Armstrong ruled that only the commission could make such a finding.

And when the commission took up the matter on Monday, in the aforementioned jam-packed meeting room, no agreement on going forward could be reached by Brooks’ 12 colleagues. After a lengthy and contentious session, the commission concurred on a resolution to meet again on a still undefined date later this month, but there was a general consensus, at least privately, that Brooks would be able to run out the clock — on the basis of her attorneys’ appeals, if by no other means — and will be able to finish her term of office.

But that tactical victory, and the ongoing fuss about Brooks, could turn out to be Pyrrhic for her election chances.

As for Judge Joe Brown (as the former Criminal Court judge was billed during the 15 years of his nationally syndicated TV arbitration show), the aura of de facto ticket booster that his celebrity had initially gained him had already sagged due to an extended period of inactivity during May and June.

Brown had let it be known that, as of July 1st, things would be different. And he was right about that, if wildly wrong about which direction the difference would take. Speaking to a group of supporters last week, he responded grumpily to a TV station’s prodding him about the deleterious effect of an ongoing divorce on his surprisingly scanty campaign finances.

A supporter filmed and posted online Brown’s angry, rambling suggestion that the media should turn its attention instead to the matter of what he called the “down low” sexuality of his opponent, incumbent District Attorney General Amy Weirich, whose lifestyle is regarded as that of a conventional wife and mother. 

Brown’s unsubstantiated remarks generated a predictable and virtually universal outrage, but he declined to disavow them, calling himself an “entertainer” running for office.

Doubtful as it is that swing voters will be amused, they were “summoned” by the newly visible Brown to a meet-and-greet this Wednesday night at the Central Train Station on Main.

• Interestingly enough, County Commissioner Justin Ford was scheduled to be the host for another meet-and-greet on Wednesday — this one for aunt Ophelia Ford‘s reelection campaign in state Senate District 29. 

It will be remembered that Commissioner Ford won his primary race in the new Commission District 9 in something of a stealth manner against two highly active opponents, former school board member Patrice Robinson and Memphis Education Association President Keith Williams. During most of the spring primary campaign, there was talk in both of those two campaigns that the race was between the two of them, that Ford had been redistricted away from his main source of support in the South Memphis environs of N. J. Ford Funeral Home, and so forth.

When votes were counted on the evening of May 6th, however, it was Justin Ford who came out ahead, having put on something of a late rush and, perhaps as importantly, riding the residual cachet that belongs to the Ford name.

Reports of a decline in the Ford political dynasty have been somewhat exaggerated. Take a look: There is a Ford on the County Commission, another (Edmund Ford) on the City Council, and, however battered by bad publicity, adverse revelations about her attendance (more of which is likely to come) and doubts about her competence, Ophelia has so far managed to remain in the state Senate.

There is no doubt that City Councilman Lee Harris, is running a smart, vigorous, and apparently well-supported and financed campaign to unseat Senator Ford, and he has the further advantage of the free media that comes from being in the public eye as a highly active member of the council.

But there is a rule of thumb about incumbents having the edge in three-way races, and the fact is that the Democratic primary race in state Senate District 29 is a three-way — a four-way, really, inasmuch as Ricky Dixon and Herman Sawyer are on the ballot along with Ford and Harris.

Either Dixon or Sawyer could siphon anti-incumbent votes away from challenger Harris, but Dixon is a threat in his own right. Brother of former state Senator Roscoe Dixon, also a Tennessee Waltz figure, candidate Dixon has run before, most recently as the Democratic nominee in 2010 for Circuit Court clerk, netting 44 percent of the votes in that race.

What happens in the remaining month or so before election day on August 7th will be crucial. If Harris can translate his endorsements and campaign appearances into visible evidence of support during early voting, which begins on Friday, July 18th, he could be on his way to a new political venue.

If so, Harris will have accomplished something not yet done by anybody — defeating a Ford for reelection. Even with someone so visibly tarnished as Ophelia Ford, that might not be so easy.

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

Letters to the Editor …

About Jackson Baker’s Politics Blog post, “Judge Joe Brown Uncorks a Shocker, Taunting Weirich About Her Sexuality” …

I’m a 65-year-old African-American male who grew up in Memphis. Anyone who knows Joe Brown knows that if you attack him, duck! They also know his justice is justice and not “just us” and the punishment fits the crime. They also should know Memphis politics, so don’t get caught up in the smoke. Mr. Brown dispenses justice not politics. The power structure in Memphis — primarily white male and home-grown, black point-men can’t get comfortable around him. If you’re a single mother, at or below the poverty line, trying to rear sons, you need Joe Brown; that is if you’re interested in justice.

Sylvester

I actually believe that there are enough decent people in this county, of all races, who will vote against Joe Brown and Henri Brooks. Sure, there will be people who vote for them, but I expect an overwhelming rebuke in a few weeks in August.

Greg Cravens

BJC123

Does this mean that Joe Brown won’t be attending the annual Memphis Pride Parade?

Tom Guleff

About Bianca Phillips’ post, “TVA Proposes Retiring Allen Fossil Plant” …

Wind and solar costs are dropping so fast that the media, let alone our collective consciousness, are having a hard time keeping up with it.

Yes, we need to maintain some local spinning generation capacity to provide power during peak demand and to assure reliability for local industry like Nucor, but we don’t need a full-time gas plant that’s larger than the existing Allen coal plant as TVA prefers.

Scott Banbury

Retiring the coal plant is a big step in the right direction, but cheap natural gas from fracking is not going to last forever. This would be an excellent opportunity for TVA to investigate solar thermal technology. There are new techniques available that can store the heat generated during the daytime to continue producing electricity at night. And if you don’t think solar thermal will work in Memphis, just think about how hot your car gets if you have to park it in the sun in the summertime.

Chris McCoy

About Bruce VanWyngarden’s editor’s column on the city budget …

You need to check your facts on the pension reform. The city wants to put us into a 401(a) program, which has major differences not in our favor. Also, we have offered three scenarios to raise money that would tax visitors to the city more than residents: 1) a gas tax of $0.01 on every gallon sold; 2) a hotel tax of $2 on every $100 spent at a hotel; 3) a 25 percent increase on the sales tax.

As far as raising property tax, the average house in Memphis pays $100, therefore the tax increase would roughly be $5 a month. I am pretty sure citizens would give up a Starbucks latte for police and fire services. 

Lastly, Mayor Wharton and his crew of seven have got to stop spending on projects we don’t have the money for. They need to learn from Mayor Luttrell’s leadership; he suspended capital improvement spending until he balanced the county budget.

Keeley Greer  Officer PII

About Randy Haspel’s Rant on Dick and Liz Cheney …

My stock portfolio soared thanks to Dick Cheney and his little buddy Bush. At the club we figured we profited over $220 million for every American death. You can’t argue with results like that.

Ern

It is a complete waste of time to get worked up about the Cheneys while President Obama continues to prove himself as willing as his predecessor to mire the USA in foreign conflicts and nation-building. He labors under the same delusion as the neo-cons — that “democracy” is workable and ideal, anywhere and everywhere. Even John Kerry is singing a different tune these days than when I voted for him in 2004.

Brunetto Latini

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

“Judge Joe Brown” Uncorks a Shocker, Taunting Weirich About Her Sexuality

Brown in the website clip

  • Brown in the website clip

From May 6, when several of his endorsees in Democratic primary elections for countywide office went down to defeat until Tuesday, July 1, when, according to his pre-announced plan, Joe Brown emerged again as a putative party figurehead at a newly opened downtown campaign headquarters, the Democrats’ nominee for District Attorney General had been more or less dormant.

Brown had abandoned what, during the earlier phase of the political year, had been an active role of his as a major player on behalf of the Democratic ticket. But now, under pressure from other party members and under scrutiny by a curious media, the former “Judge Joe Brown” of a once well-watched TV arbitration program re-emerged, in full damn-the-torpedoes style.

Under the head “My Divorce Ain’t Your Business,” Brown’s campaign website published a video of the candidate, who has been rumored to be readying his private resources for the Democratic ticket’s use, addressing the matter of his finances while talking to a small group. Speaking apparently in response to a direct query from Fox 13 News regarding the current state of his affairs after going through a presumably expensive divorce, Brown tries to blow off the inquiry in the clip, changing the subject.

What he says next is jolting, indeed — especially given the widespread assumption that he is just now hoping to resume his role as a tutorial voice for his party prior to the August 7 general election and primaries for state and federal office.

Smiling wide, Brown strolls about holding a hand mike and says, obviously referencing his August 7 opponent, incumbent Republican D.A. Amy Weirich, “But they could ask her why her husband moved out and took the kids. Why a certain somebody moved in next door to her…I won’t hold it against anybody that’s their right but some in her community are on her about she needs to come out of the closet and instead of being so low down, she needs to stop being down low.”

The implication of that is as obvious as it is shocking, and the truth content of it is irrelevant. For the record, though, Fox 13 reports getting this response from Weirich spokesperson Kim Perry: “Amy and her husband are at home right now. I hope for Judge Brown’s sake and the community, that those around him will intervene to get him the help he needs.”

To be sure, Shelby County Democrats had been looking Brown’s way for a sign that he intended to resume his leadership role in a coordinated party campaign. It is doubtful that this is precisely what they expected or can welcome.

Note: The video mentioned below has been purged from YouTube, but here are links, courtesy of Fox 13, to videos documenting Brown’s remarks:

http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/clip/10326066/judge-joe-brown-questions-amy-weirichs-sexuality

http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/clip/10326035/judge-brown-questions-weirichs-sexuality-clip-1

http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/clip/10326043/judge-brown-questions-weirichs-sexuality-clip-2

http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/clip/10326053/judge-brown-questions-weirichs-sexuality-clip-3

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

What They Said…

About Bryce Ashby and Michael LaRosa’s Viewpoint on requiring state legislators to take remedial civics classes …

I entirely agree with the Bryce Ashby and Michael LaRosa that our state legislators should be required to pass a civics test in order to hold office. That would certainly reduce the laughing-stock potential of Tennessee nationally.

But why stop there? Equally important to the functioning of our representative republic is an informed electorate. Let’s require a simple civics test at the polls on each election day. (My parents had to do this back in the 1950s, along with a $1 poll tax. Both measures have since been declared unconstitutional.)

But just think about it: If voters even had to come up with one correct answer regarding the fundamentals of our government, there would never be a Democrat elected in Tennessee again!

Bill Busler

About Bruce VanWyngarden’s column on Obamacare …

The Affordable Care Act was drafted in a Senate committee chaired by Max Baucus of Montana. Years ago, I considered moving to Montana, so I took the Billings Gazette for a long time. I followed the career of Baucus from the state legislature to Congress to the Senate. He was a Democrat in a Republican-leaning state.

His Senate committee quickly discarded the single-payer system, like Medicare, when it met resistance. They switched to a plan that originated in a conservative think tank and was the basis of the Massachusetts health-care plan. Baucus took nearly 200 suggestions from Republicans to be bipartisan. It got no Republican votes, and Republicans have zealously tried to impede and repeal it, yet they have no replacement plan for the 7.5 million now signed up.

Why is Governor Haslam afraid of Tenncare being defunded after expansion? If he’s really concerned about the state’s finances, he wouldn’t have let more than $100 million in money already taxed and collected go to other states. No one has seen the alternative to Tenncare that the governor is supposedly proposing to Health and Human Services. There is a kicker in a provision in the law called the “shared responsibility tax” on employees that could run as high as $72 million. What will they do if the the governor and the legislature don’t act?

Greg Cravens

Raymond Skinner

About Jackson Baker’s post, “Whalum Slams Joe Brown’s Pretensions to Party Leadership” …

TRUTH !!!!!! “How in the world, how on God’s green earth, can a person be literally gone from Memphis and Shelby County for 20 years and come back and claim to be the Democratic boss?”

Tom Guleff

About Bianca Phillips’ post, “House Resolution Seeks to Defend Tennessee Marriage Amendment” …

Soon Joe Carr and his sorry ilk will be in the trash heap of history along with the segregationists of yesteryear. Meanwhile, they will waste our tax money passing useless resolutions and defending discriminatory laws that will soon be void. Marriage equality is winning!

Chris in Midtown

About a post titled “What’s Wrong With Zach Randolph’s Defense?” …

He’s slow and can’t jump. I’m prone to brevity.

38103

About a Toby Sells News Blog item, “Halbert: State is to Blame for Untested Rape Kits in Memphis” …

We can thank the Tennessee Republicans for not funding the testing of rape kits. And they call themselves “Christians” … only if Charles Manson is the Pope. Let us not forget it was these same Republicans who tried to pass a bill that would have redefined rape to make it legal. Vote Republican and you vote to support rape of women and children.

Sam Cardinal

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

What They Said…

About “Get Off Our Lawn,” Toby Sells’ story on a group seeking to keep parking off Overton Park’s Greensward …

The argument from the Citizens to Preserve Overton Park should be, “stop playing golf on my lawn.” The zoo is a treasure for the city, as is the park itself, and it is a good thing that it is so well visited. If you consider land usage density per area of Overton Park as a measure of success, it would seem that the best uses of land are the new playground, the dog park, the zoo, and the Greensward. The most inefficient use of land is the golf course.

Judging by Google Earth, the golf course is roughly three times larger than the Greensward. At most, it can accommodate 30 to 40 players at a time. That is a very poor usage density. The time has come to grow the Greensward and eliminate the golf course. Then the occasional overflow zoo parking won’t be such a nuisance. Mark Mazzone

About Bianca Phillips’ story, “For the Birds and Dogs,” regarding a law tightening restrictions on dog- and cock-fighting …

I predict that if this passes the General Assembly of Tennessee Hillbillies, cock-fighting will first be stripped out of it so as not to offend them that brung them to the General Assembly dance.

Jeff

About Bruce VanWyngarden’s Editor’s Letter regarding red state versus blue state dependency on the federal government …

One only needs to look at Mississippi’s current budget for 2014 to see how dependent they are on the Feds to take care of them. The general fund budget from the state was $5.03 billion. The federal government sent $7.89 billion to the state.

Charlie Eppes

About Toby Sell’s post, “Victims of Serial Rapist File New Lawsuit Against Memphis, Shelby County” …

The statue of limitations is very important when talking about lawsuits for negligence and lack of due diligence in regard to rape and what harm the women say it caused them because of it.

oldtimeplayer

OTP seems very, very focused on the “statue (sic) of limitations.” Why is that?

Hadji

I think he’s referring to a bronze likeness of himself, “The Statue Of Limitations,” that sits next to his Dell PC.

Dave Clancy

About Jackson Baker’s post, “Reporter at Judge Joe Brown’s Post-Jail Press Conference Was a Plant” …

She did not violate any journalistic ethics. She asked questions. You can’t decide who can ask questions and who can’t. I don’t remember seeing her questions aired on local media, only on the campaign page. I think she did a good job … I know that’s not a popular opinion here, but I think you guys are beating a dead horse. You have a very weak argument. She wasn’t pretending to be anything. She wasn’t wearing any fake credentials, didn’t claim to belong to any news outlet. She asked questions that are probably on the minds of a good many Memphians. You are not the gatekeepers of media. Get over yourselves.

Indy Lucy

Indy Lucy, ya think? Journalists should:

—Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.

— Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility.

— Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and shun secondary employment, political involvement, public office, and service in community organizations if they compromise journalistic integrity.

— Disclose unavoidable conflicts.

— Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.

— Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their pressure to influence news coverage.

— Be wary of sources offering information for favors or money; avoid bidding for news.

And that’s just some of ’em.

Mia S. Kite

Categories
Editorial Opinion

April Fool(s)!

It is, as anybody with a calendar — or a sense of humor — can tell, the first week of April. We should explain on the front end that we went to press on April 1st, and, though the great majority of entries in this issue of the Flyer are

straight as the gate and, in any case, reliable as news and information, we are not above a jest or two in the spirit of April Fool’s Day.

The problem we have discovered, however, is the same one that the illustrious novelist Philip Roth hit upon way back in the 1960s when he realized that his trade — that of writing fiction, and glorious fiction at that — was in danger of becoming obsolete because the nature of “reality” itself had turned so surreal. So it was that Roth noted the expedient of writing satire and essays for a spell. We are, however, grateful that he finally turned back to writing novels, composing in the process several masterpieces or near-masterpieces to go with the rest of his quite considerable canon.

Still, we too, have noticed that the line between truth and fiction has begun to dissolve, as, indeed, so has the boundary between farce and reality. Several instances of the phenomenon have reminded us of those facts this week, and — surprise! — they come from the world of politics.

Nevermind the email that Steve Mulroy, a candidate for county mayor, sent out to the media on Tuesday, claiming to be quitting his campaign for the opportunity to become “regional director of corporate public relations for the Kellogg’s corporation.” Mulroy, for the record, has been actively involved in supporting the locked-out workers of that very corporation, as anybody who has paid attention knows. That did not stop several local media from taking the “release” seriously and checking it out (in one case, actually posting it online) as legitimate news.

It is easy, in a way, to understand their confusion. After all, only last Thursday night, a county Commission candidate, Taylor Berger, presided over a packed and, to the impartial observer, fully successful fund-raiser, climaxing the event with a rousing and positive address. On Monday of this week, however, came a press release from Berger. He was out; personal reasons.

Then there was veteran Democratic operative Del Gill making bold statements recently to publicly advise the NAACP as to how they should construct forums involving political candidates this year: by “separating” candidates from the two parties, he explained, into two discrete groups. Failing that, Gill advised, Democratic candidates might reconsider their participation in the forum. That the venerable NAACP is entitled to present candidate forums however it pleases and candidates, likewise, can make up their own minds about appearing at such events seemed beside the point.

And, finally, there was Judge Joe Brown, the erstwhile Criminal Court judge and TV star, staging a confrontation in Juvenile Court that ended with his temporary arrest and a cameo jail appearance. That was quickly followed by an impromptu “press conference” at which a Brown campaign staffer posed as a reporter and asked several softball questions of the candidate.

Mr. Roth — who has indeed finally retired from writing novels — didn’t know the half of it.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Holding on Tight

What is interesting at this stage of Election 2014 in Shelby County is the degree to which what used to be called “coattails” loom larger than usual.

The endorsement game gets played in every election, of course, but there is usually a good deal less correlation between one politician’s favorable say-so about another and good results for the latter on Election Day than there is between, say, a famous athlete’s mug on a Wheaties box and the degree to which that cereal gets itself munched.

Endorsement campaigns in politics don’t do nearly as well. One reason is that people tend to make up their minds about candidates on other levels. For political regulars, most often it’s on a pure party-line basis. Or specific issues may predominate in voters’ minds — on the basis of candidates’ zeal or lack of it on hot-button issues like abortion or gun carry or school-district independence.

Or, as Michael Reagan, the adopted son of the late President Ronald Reagan, a talk show host, and a fixture on the Republican  lecture circuit, told it to a crowd of the GOP faithful at Collierville’s Town Square on Monday, “people vote for the people they like.” That was how his father was able to create a class of voters known as “Reagan Democrats,” and that was something that Republicans running in politically divided Shelby County had best keep in mind in 2014, he said.

Talk to people about “shared values,” he urged. Yet Reagan’s very presence, along with that of 8th District Congressman Stephen Fincher, whose reelection contest won’t occur until November, was designed to confer something else upon the Republican ticket that will present itself to the electorate in August, and whose current office-holders were scattered generously in the crowd at Collierville — a bit of borrowed luster.

That was especially so in the case of Michael Reagan — likable but not notably charismatic in his own right but someone whose family name is the ultimate brand in Republican politics and whose late father remains, for the GOP rank and file and crossover voters alike, the emblematic Wheaties-box avatar.

Another circumstance at the Collierville event underscored the endorsement principle even more directly. Mark Luttrell, the Republican Shelby County mayor who will have his own reelection battle this August but who has always done well with middle-of-the-road groups and Democratic crossovers, had already had his turn on the dais and now became de facto master of ceremonies for a late arrival, District Attorney General Amy Weirich.

Almost compulsively, as Weirich stepped forward to take her place at the mic, Luttrell grabbed her in a vise-like one-armed hug and said, “Folks, we can’t afford to lose this girl. We cannot afford to lose this — I said ‘girl.’ This lady, this general, this District Attorney General, this paragon of virtue and a student of the law!”

The crowd exuded a surprised chuckle at the county mayor’s sudden show of zeal. “Don’t laugh, I’m telling the damn truth,” Luttrell said, still holding Weirich close. “Folks, let’s get out there and give our all for all of our candidates, but let’s remember: This lady here needs to be our attorney general. Amy Weirich!”

And then, and only then, Luttrell released her, and the endorsee could begin her speech — a measured, cheerful paean to public safety and good weather and high hopes and pride in her record.

There had been meta-messages a-plenty in that hug of Luttrell’s, that fervent introduction, that almost desperate-sounding endorsement. Weirich strikes a lot of people as an able professional, but this year she is up against not a checklist but an opponent of unpredictable intensity, of enormous panache and demonstrated show-business skill — Judge Joe Brown, the de facto Democratic nominee already, as Weirich, also uncontested in her primary, is a de facto nominee.

Famous for his 15-odd years in Los Angeles as a reality-show judge on daytime TV, the former Shelby County Criminal Court judge, a returned prodigal if there ever was one, had already shown what he could do in the previous week. Dropping into Juvenile Court and latching on to an unrepresented client the way somebody else might pick up a discarded newspaper, Brown stormed into a courtroom and a) made a shambles of judicial order, or b) struck a blow for justice. Pick one, depending on your politics.

He challenged the credentials of the presiding magistrate, decried the court itself as a “circus” and a “sorry operation,” got himself cited for contempt and (briefly) jailed. A disgraceful spectacle. Or a gallant deed. Again, take your pick, according to your politics. A domination of the news week, in either case. And a demonstration of political potency.

It was already axiomatic that Brown’s star power, if harnessed properly and, like nitroglycerin, kept within safe limits, could drive a lot of votes for the Democratic ticket. Contrariwise, he might implode unpredictably and scarify middle-of-the-road voters into going the other way.

In any case, Brown’s own version of the hug — both literal and figurative — is at this point a blessing devoutly to be wished by his fellow Democrats. On Saturday, he turned up in Whitehaven for the headquarters opening of Patrice Robinson, running for the District 9 County Commission seat in the Democratic primary against two tough opponents, Memphis Education Association President Keith Williams and incumbent Justin Ford.

Brown endorsed Robinson and sealed his endorsement with a bone-crushing hug — in every way a precursor and ironic counterpart to Luttrell’s hug of Weirich, two days later.

Nor is Brown’s embrace necessarily reserved for representatives of the inner city. In what is arguably an odd-couple arrangement, he has decided to make common cause with Steve Mulroy, the focused, Jesuitical, limerick-loving professor of law at the University of Memphis who has made a role for himself as the County Commission’s liberal light.

Mulroy is in a three-way battle for the Democratic nomination for county mayor with well-liked veteran Deidre Malone and with the Rev. Kenneth Whalum, an outspoken former school board member who sees himself as the people’s voice.

Both party regular Malone or Whalum, a maverick’s maverick, might regard themselves as deserving of the nod from Brown, but it is Mulroy who has it, perhaps because of their joint connection with the legal profession. He and Brown have recently been in conversations about doing joint campaign endeavors.

For her part, Malone announced an endorsement last week from James Harvey, the current county Commission chairman who dropped out of the county mayor’s race himself at the withdrawal deadline and is now looking down the road at a city mayor’s race in 2015.

                      

Jackson Baker

Taylor Berger, who’s no longer running, with his son

• Meanwhile, one of the touted races — between Republican incumbent County Commissioner Heidi Shafer and Democratic challenger Taylor Berger, has ceased to be — at roughly the point that it seemed to be heating up.

It was only last Thursday night, at a packed fund-raising affair that the Berger campaign seemed to be acquiring enough real energy to be competitive. But Berger announced on Monday that he was out of the race. Citing personal concerns on his Facebook page, Berger said, “To run this race right, I’d jeopardize my family and business.” After what had been a significant advance build-up, and especially after last week’s event, the timing left some of Berger’s supporters, who included some well-heeled donors, puzzled.