Categories
Cover Feature News

Inside the MPD

In the wake of the killing of Tyre Nichols by members of the Memphis Police Department’s SCORPION Unit in January 2023, the Department of Justice (DOJ) initiated an investigation of the MPD to determine if officers regularly violated citizens’ rights. After 18 months of reviewing case files and video, interviewing Memphians, riding along with officers, and observing the inner workings of the MPD, the DOJ released its findings on December 4th. The 70-page report concludes, “After an extensive investigation, the Department of Justice has reasonable cause to believe that the MPD and the city engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives people of their rights under the Constitution and federal law.”

“Don’t Kill Me!” 

The DOJ investigators highlighted four key findings: 1. MPD uses excessive force. 2. MPD conducts unlawful stops, searches, and arrests. 3. MPD unlawfully discriminates against Black people in its enforcement activities. 4. The city and MPD unlawfully discriminate in their response to people with behavioral health disabilities. To support these findings, investigators cited numerous instances of violence by MPD officers against the citizens of Memphis. “Excessive force is routine in MPD,” DOJ investigators write. “Officers use force as a first resort, demand unquestioning obedience, and exact punishment if they do not receive it.”

Nine police cars and 12 officers responded to a call where a mentally ill man stole a $2 soft drink from a convenience store. After he put his hands up to surrender, he was beaten. He screamed, “Don’t kill me!” and tried to run away. He was subdued and repeatedly tased while face-down on the ground, then served two days in jail for disorderly conduct and theft. 

In another case, three officers tackled a man who had littered in a public park. “The man had done nothing wrong, but was ‘talking all this shit,’ according to one officer, and would not tell the officers his name. When the man dropped his drink while leaving the park, four officers surrounded him. … While handcuffed in the patrol car later, the man told a lieutenant that he was trying to follow the officers’ directions, but they had already decided to charge him: ‘I even offered to pick the can up.’”

The DOJ report finds fatal flaws in the MPD’s frontline strategy. “Memphis has relied on traffic stops to address violent crime. The police department has encouraged officers in specialized units, task forces, and patrol to prioritize street enforcement. Officers and community members have described this approach as ‘saturation,’ or flooding neighborhoods with traffic stops. This strategy involves frequent contact with the public and gives wide discretion to officers, which requires close supervision and clear rules to direct officers’ activity. But MPD does not ensure that officers conduct themselves in a lawful manner.” 

In two instances cited in the report, officers followed drivers to their destinations and confronted them for traffic violations. One woman was standing on the porch of a relative’s house. After she didn’t produce ID and told the police they were “not welcome on the property,” officers cuffed her, roughed her up, and threatened to pepper spray her. The report states, “After locking her in a police car, one officer asked, ‘So what did we see her do?’ When an officer suggested the woman’s car had improperly tinted windows, another officer responded, ‘All this for a tint?’ The officer shook his head and gestured with his hand that the woman talked too much.”

In another incident, officers forced their way into the home of a woman accused of driving with expired tags and failing to stop at a stop sign. “No exigent circumstances demanded they enter the woman’s home, and the officers had no justification to use force to push their way inside for a nonviolent traffic infraction,” reads the report. After arresting the woman in front of her crying child, “… one officer reflected, ‘In the grand scheme of things, this does not seem like it was worth it.’” 

Officers frequently use potentially deadly neck restraints, similar to the one Minneapolis Police Department members applied fatally to George Floyd when he was killed in 2020. In Memphis, an intoxicated man was repeatedly choked into submission until he urinated on himself. “He was not charged with any crime.” 

After offering a ride home to a man suffering a mental health crisis, the police uncovered an outstanding warrant for theft. The officer pulled the man from the police car, saying, “You’re fixing to get your ass whupped.” When the man tried to flee, the officer beat him and put him in a neck restraint. 

Officers were frequently observed beating, tasing, and pepper spraying people who were already restrained and posed no threat. “One officer hit a handcuffed man in the face and torso with a baton eight times.” 

In addition, “Officers repeatedly permitted police dogs to bite or continue to bite people, including children, who were nonresistant and attempting to surrender.” 

In one incident, an officer investigating a stolen vehicle report “fired at a car at least eight times at a fast food drive-thru in the middle of the day, jeopardizing other officers and bystanders. … MPD’s investigation improperly found that this use of deadly force was justified.” 

In a sidebar titled “Sick of his fucking mouth,” the DOJ investigators write, “MPD officers escalate incidents involving minor offensives by responding to perceived insults, disrespect, or ‘verbal resistance’ with unconstitutional force. … Some MPD officers seem to believe that questioning their authority justifies force — as one supervisor told us, ‘If someone says, “I ain’t under arrest,” that’s resisting arrest right there.’” 

Children were not spared the MPD’s methods. When one 16-year-old girl called police to report that she had been assaulted, she ended up in handcuffs. “After three hours, officers removed the handcuffs to reposition them. As she complained that her hands were hurt and swollen and tried to move her wrists, the officers grabbed her and pushed her face down onto the ground to handcuff her again. The girl was then arrested and charged with disorderly conduct.”

When officers were dispersing a crowd after a fight at a high school football game, one officer singled out a “relatively small-statured teen girl trying to leave the premises, yelling ‘Bye! Bye!’ at her. The officer’s taunts provoked the girl, who talked back. In response, the officer shoved the girl, yelling, ‘Get out this motherfuckin’ lot.’ The girl pushed back, and two other officers approached the girl from behind and threw her on the ground. The officers then lifted the girl in the air and slammed her face down into the pavement. The officer who started the altercation told her to ‘Get your dumb ass up,’ and called her a ‘stupid bitch’ as the girl was led away in handcuffs.”

When officers chased two Black boys, aged 15 and 16, who were suspected of a curfew violation, one officer, who had dropped his mobile phone in the chase, said, “I am fucking these little kids up, man. … I am fucking you all up. I just wanted to let y’all know that.” 

In another incident, “One officer shot a teenager, and then another officer hit the teenager three times in the head with the butt of his handgun and at least 12 times with a closed fist. The teen was disarmed, seriously injured, and posed no threat at the time. Prosecutors later sent a letter to MPD stating that they ‘seriously considered recommending criminal charges’ against the officer because of the ‘more than one dozen closed fist punches to the face’ that the officer delivered. The prosecutors wrote, ‘We trust that you will handle this as an internal matter and leave it to your sound discretion.’ We saw no evidence that any further investigation took place or that any discipline was imposed. The officer remains employed at MPD.”

The report concludes, “Supervisors do not address these recurrent practices, and some at MPD defend these practices. As one field training officer told us, ‘We’re not excessive enough with these criminals. We baby them.’” 

Officers use force as a first resort; MPD treats Black people more harshly. (Photo: Department of Justice)

Black People Bear the Brunt

On page 37 of the report, DOJ investigators write, “MPD’s own data show that across a range of different law enforcement actions, MPD treats Black people more harshly than white people when they engage in similar conduct.” 

While 64 percent of Memphians are Black, 81 percent of the MPD’s traffic violations are issued to Black people. Officers issued 33.2 percent more moving violations in predominately Black neighborhoods than they did in predominately white neighborhoods. Black drivers were cited for equipment violations at 4.5 times the rate of white drivers; for improperly tinted windows, the rate was 9.8 times. Public health data indicates that both Black and white people use cannabis at the same rate, but MPD arrested Black people for marijuana possession at more than five times the rate of white people. 

The report found that the MPD stopped and cited one Black man 30 times in three years. In another case, “MPD stopped a Black man outside a dollar store ‘due to multiple robberies of dollar stores in the area,’ according to the police report. The officers had no reason to suspect that this particular man took part in the robberies, and the man told them he was just waiting for a friend. When he didn’t leave or produce ID, police handcuffed him, beat him with a baton, and pepper sprayed him. The officers had no reason to believe that the man engaged in criminal activity and lacked reasonable suspicion to stop him. But they arrested him anyway, and he spent a night in jail. Prosecutors declined to pursue any charges stemming from the incident. After the incident, the man noted, ‘They had no reason to do this. And they’re out here doing this to people every day.’”

Mental Health Crisis

In 1988, after the MPD killed a mentally ill man who was cutting himself, the city founded the Crisis Intervention Team (CIT). Composed of officers who have specialized training in dealing with behavioral health issues, the CIT became a model other city’s police departments emulated. But the DOJ found “serious problems with the CIT program,” and that “officers often escalate behavioral encounters and use combative tactics almost immediately after arriving to behavioral health calls. … We observed CIT officers in Memphis belittle and mock people with behavioral health disabilities. In one incident, a CIT officer hit a man in the head and threatened him with a Taser while officers called him a ‘motherfucker,’ ‘bitch,’ and a ‘dumbass.’” One CIT officer earned the nickname “Taser Face.”

One 8-year-old Black boy with four behavioral health diagnoses encountered the MPD nine times between December 2021 and August 2023. He was threatened with tasing, handcuffed, and repeatedly thrown onto a couch. In one incident, when the boy stuck out his tongue, the CIT officer responded by bending his arm back and screaming, “I can break your arm with the snap of my wrist.” 

The report says that while 75 percent of 911 calls involving people with mental illness are nonviolent, “MPD’s training on behavioral health primes officers to approach people with behavioral health disabilities with force and aggression, and our review revealed they often do. For instance, a training given to all new officers erroneously teaches that people with bipolar disorder do not feel pain.” 

The City Responds

At a press conference on December 5, 2024, Mayor Paul Young responded to the DOJ’s findings — while repeatedly emphasizing that he had not read the report. “I believe that even one incident of mistreatment by the police is one too many. … The report the DOJ released last night is going to be difficult to read. Some of the incidents the DOJ report described are simply not acceptable, and our hearts go out to every person who has been impacted by those actions.”

In cities such as Seattle, New Orleans, and Chicago which have previously been the subject of DOJ investigations, city governments entered into consent decrees, negotiated with the DOJ, that outline the steps police departments must take to improve. At the press conference, Young ruled out signing such a decree. “We believe adjustments we’ve already begun making must continue, and that they must expand. It’s my job as mayor to fight for the best interests of our entire community. Every member. After carefully considering the information we received from DOJ, we didn’t believe that entering into any agreement in principle or consent decree right now, before even thoroughly reading the DOJ report, would be in the best interest of our community. It’s crucial that the city has the time to do a thorough review and respond to the findings before agreeing to anything that could become a long-term financial burden to our residents, and could, in fact, actually slow down our ongoing efforts to continuously improve our police department.” 

Young cited recent statistics which show a 13 percent drop in crime overall, and a 19 percent drop in violent crimes. Police Chief C.J. Davis echoed the mayor’s position that the department is on the right track. “In some of the areas that have been outlined in the report, we have made significant changes aligned with the Department of Justice, getting their support with some of the training that has been ongoing, not just this year, but in previous years.” 

In response to the sections of the report regarding the MPD’s treatment of children, Davis said, “We spend a lot of time with our children in our community. We graduated over a thousand children from our D.A.R.E./G.R.E.A.T. program, and work consistently to try to improve those relationships. We’re going to look through the report to ensure that we’re not missing anything.”

Shelby County District Attorney Steve Mulroy has studied the full report. “I think it’s very concerning and shouldn’t be dismissed. I still think the vast majority of folks on the force are people of good faith. They have a hard job, having to make quick decisions in stressful, sometimes dangerous situations. But that doesn’t mean there can’t be systemic issues of culture, training, and supervision that cry out for reform.”

When Shahidah Jones of the Official Black Lives Matter Memphis Chapter read the report, she recalls thinking, “Not to be cynical, but it was just like, ‘Duh.’ We didn’t choose to target police because we didn’t have anything else to do or we were looking at these one-off instances. A very large part of organizing is for us to learn history and do our political study. … This is not something new. This is the way police have been taught to operate.” 

Josh Spickler, executive director of criminal justice-reform nonprofit Just City, agrees. “I’m not particularly surprised by the report. I recognize some of these stories, some of the examples from media reports. Many of these things are well-documented and well-known incidents. And the findings are bad and awful, and as even Mayor Young said, hard to read, but they are not surprising.”

For Amber Sherman, who lobbied the city council for reform in the wake of the Tyre Nichols killing, the report felt like vindication. “My immediate action really was that it just corroborated everything that, you know, we as organizers here in Memphis have been saying for so long, especially with Decarcerate Memphis, where we’ve been really pressing the issue about pretextual stops and how dangerous they are.”

Decarcerate Memphis’ Alex Hensley, who drafted the reform ordinances which were passed by the city council in reduced forms after the Tyre Nichols killing, says she, too, feels vindicated by the report. “Activists and organizers have been saying all of these things for years on end, and then to have the DOJ — which is a policing entity, by the way — to say that, yeah, we need to not prioritize these low-level violations.” 

DA Mulroy says, “We need to rethink about using specialized units for routine enforcement. And distinguish between traffic stops that actually affect safety or real crime, like moving violations and drive-out tag fraud violations, which make sense. But some of these minor equipment violations, the data shows the hit rate on those is very low — you’re talking like 2 to 3 percent of the time do you find weapons or drugs or somebody that’s wanted on a serious charge. But the data also show those are precisely the types of offenses that are associated with racial profiling. You really have to think about what kind of a bang you’re getting for your buck. You’re potentially alienating the community that you most want to cooperate with law enforcement because they’re the ones who see the crime.” 

City council member Dr. Jeff Warren said he had not yet read the report. “If you remember, around the time that Black Lives Matter occurred after the George Floyd killing, the council began a process where we were involved with the police department, trying to initiate reforms. Some of the reforms that we actually initiated were negated by the state legislature. … I think we’ve been in the process of reform since this current police chief came on board; we’re doing that right now. That’s one of the reasons I don’t really think that the city needs to be entering into a consent decree that will cost taxpayers multiple millions of dollars, when it’s something we’re already trying to do.”

When asked about the DOJ’s finding that MPD recruits are taught that people with bipolar disorder cannot feel pain, Warren, a family physician, responded, “I don’t know where they got that from. Just because it’s written in a report doesn’t mean that’s the truth.”

The treatment of what the MPD calls “mental consumers” is one issue where there may be consensus on reform. The DOJ report cites multiple high-ranking MPD officers, as well as Memphis Fire Department officials and 911 call-takers, who believe that a new department specializing in mental health situations is needed to shift the burden from the MPD. 

“We should listen to them on that,” says Hensley. “If this city is so pro-police, listen to them on this subject. Clearly, there are a lot of mental health calls and a lot of mental health issues within our community that I think tie back to these issues of poverty, lack of housing, lack of investments in basic necessities. We have to come up with something different.” 

Spickler says, “There’s data that shows that most interactions with people in mental health crises are not violent. There are ways of responding that wouldn’t lead you to have to tell people falsely that people with bipolar don’t feel pain. One of the great suggestions of this report is that we don’t have to send an armed person to some of the things that we send them to, like a stranded motorist, traffic accidents, and mental health calls. These are all things that can be handled with someone who has safety and resolution as their mission and not what we have in this police department — and most police departments, frankly — and that is a warrior mentality. There’s an arrogance to it, and there’s an offensiveness to it. 

“There’s nothing about policing that should be offensive. It’s ‘to protect and serve,’ right? Many police departments across America have tried to shift to a guardian model, which is how policing, I think, is most effective. But throughout that report, you see very clear evidence that that is not the case at the Memphis Police Department. There is no guardian mentality. It’s not taught; it’s not modeled. It’s really not expected. What is expected is that you get what you want by whatever means necessary.” 

Will Anything Change?

The election of Donald Trump, who has promised a “brutal approach” to law enforcement, has brought the next steps into question. Whether a future DOJ would sue to impose a settlement with the city is an open question.

“I’m not gonna speculate about their motivations, but I think it’s obvious to anybody that there’s a very good chance that a lot of this will be dropped or, at a minimum, they’ll be less aggressive about enforcing it with the new administration,” says DA Mulroy. “We’ve seen that before with the prior Trump administration. That could be anyone’s calculus in dealing with the aftermath of November 5th.”

At his press conference, Mayor Young said, “We would have the same position regardless of the outcome of the presidential election.” 

A consent decree with the DOJ would result in federal monitors being assigned to the MPD in order to ensure that they do not violate citizens’ constitutional rights. In his regular Friday email on December 6th, Young wrote, “Instead of a broad and potentially prolonged federal oversight via a consent decree — which could impose millions in costs on our residents — we believe by taking a holistic, community-focused approach we can move further and faster toward the change we need with less cost to our community.”

These costs must be weighed against the costs of not acting, says Hensley. “I think they’re going to pay for it one way or another. First of all, they’re bloating the costs. We’ve looked at other cities, some of them have been high, but it’s spread out over time. There are just all these other elements that are being left out to make it seem like we’re going to go bankrupt next year. That’s disingenuous. Tyre Nichols’ family is suing them for $500 million — and that’s just one person. I’m not their chief financial officer, but you can look at that clearly and see the costs are going to be far worse if they don’t sign the consent decree, or if they don’t do these reforms.” 

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Grants Boost Community Organizations in Housing and Justice Reform

Grants totaling $475,000 will allow three community-focused organizations to expand their work in justice reform, landlord accountability, and structural barriers in housing, while also dispelling myths about who these issues affect.

The funding is a result of an initiative of Community Foundation of Greater Memphis (CFGM) to tackle housing reform and inequities, and marks a “radical reimagining” of its grant making process.

The grantees are The Greater Memphis Housing Justice Project ($165,000), Just City ($100,000), and Memphis Interfaith Coalition For Action and Hope (MICAH) ($210,000).

Aerial Ozuzu, director of community impact for CFGM, said the organization went through a rigorous consulting and strategic planning process from January to April of 2023. As a result, the organization’s consultants touched on themes of funding equity, exploring collective impact, and property usage of community data to name a few, Ozuzu said.

“The committee decided early on that they didn’t want to take a Band-Aid approach and offer short-term relief,” Ozuzu said. “While meeting the immediate needs of our community will always be essential, it tends to be a safe and conventional method that only leads to incremental change at best.” 

CFGM decided to tackle these issues, which resulted in its Reforming the Housing and Justice Systems grant initiative. The committee reviewed applications in late 2023, and considered solutions that would lead to “a more fair, thriving, and resilient region for all.” Out of 66 applicants, the grantees were narrowed down to the three organizations.

“These are organizations that are uniquely addressing root cause issues of housing injustice,” Ozuzu said. “They are taking an unconventional approach to making change in our community. They are also organizations that hold community trust.”

Ozuzu said since this is a new approach for CFGM, they are on a learning journey with their grantees. However, she added that they are investing in these organizations to do the work they’ve been doing for a majority of their existence.

Gisela Guerrero, lead organizer of MICAH; Josh Spickler, executive director of Just City; Jamie Johnson, Memphis Public Interest Law Center; and Shirley Bondon of the Black Clergy Collaborative of Memphis met to discuss their work and how they plan to tackle their respective issues during the Community Foundation Annual Meeting and Grant Panel in May.

Ozuzu mentioned that while certain systems are important, they can sometimes pose “inequities and problems” due to the way they have operated for years. Part of the work that these agencies are doing to tackle these inequities are by specializing in specific sectors such as court and policy.

Bondon added that the government systems are failing both the city and county and Spickler emphasized the failures of the justice system. Guerrero emphasized MICAH’s focus on tackling justice and equity regarding education, economics, and race and class. 

“It feels like there are so many things that are happening,” Guerrero said. “There are so many systems that could be better, that could be improved and are creating so much harm, but we believe is if we can narrow it down, or focus on a few, we can make some better progress that way.

The participants also discussed certain misconceptions about their approach to their work such as the idea that Just City “refuses to acknowledge that some people should be taken out of society,” and that MICAH and The Greater Memphis Housing Project “are against property owners and anti-development … they all just aim to agitate without providing solutions.”

“I have a lot of confidence that years from now, we’re going to find out these were the right decisions,” Spickler said regarding Just City’s work. “We’ve got to be very careful in these days ahead that we don’t undercut some really important rights, and that’s what we’ll be working on over the next few years.”

Bondon said the misconceptions they hear the most is that “renters are all bad” and “landlords are all bad.” While she said this isn’t true, she acknowledged that there is an imbalance of power. 

“There is this perception that ‘good enough’ is fine for the poor,” Bondon said. “It’s not … You have to understand the imbalance, and we hope to balance those scales. We want renters and landlords to balance — want equity.”

Ozuzu said the organizations have received their first year’s funding. She added that while this is a new way of doing things, it provides a different way of looking at how to implement change in Memphis.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Groups Advocate for Big Changes in Youth Justice System

A consortium of organizations want systemic changes in the youth justice system and have formally requested a meeting with Shelby County Sheriff Floyd Bonner to address them.

The Black Clergy Collaborative of Memphis (BCCM) announced on Wednesday that they, along with nine other organizations, delivered to Bonner seeking his help to develop a new plan to address issues they see in the system. The consortium includes Stand for Children – Tennessee, Gifts of Life Ministries, Whole Child Strategies, Just City, Shelby Countywide Juvenile Justice Consortium, The Equity Alliance, Memphis for All, Memphis Interfaith Coalition for Action and Hope (MICAH), and Youth Justice Action Council (YJAC).

The biggest concern for the group is that the Shelby County Youth Justice and Education Center has not allowed in-person visitation for several years. they also said youth are not receiving an education that parallels mainstream public school; they are not allowed time outdoors; and research and advocacy organizations are not allowed time with detained youth.

The groups say the youth justice system should “balance accountability with rehabilitation,” and that those who are detained should “ receive appropriate care, education, and support during their involvement with the legal process.”

The wellbeing of detained youth is dependent on community collaboration, they said, and they are “eager” to develop a plan focused on “youth adolescent development and their strengths.”That plan should include data, research, and evidence-based practices, they said, something missing now.

“Unfortunately, some organizations gathering data and performing research have been denied access to youth in detention who have lived experiences that can inform the plan that will help youth avoid interaction with the justice system and prevent them from returning if they have already been involved,” the groups said.

A report from the Disability Rights TN and Youth Law Center says “logistical and cost barriers” often stop families from visiting their children while they’re detained. The advocacy consortium listed a variety of other reasons like transportation burdens and phone restrictions that also have proved to be hurdles to visitation.

“Parents literally cannot parent their children, not because they don’t want to, but because the juvenile justice system erects barriers that make it virtually impossible to do so,” the report said.

The report from the law center also says detained youth “ are not receiving an education that parallels mainstream public schools and holds them to the same academic standards.”

“Receiving appropriate education ensures that youth eligible to return to school after release will be prepared to succeed in mainstream public schools and will not be further marginalized,” the groups said. “Youth who do not return to public education should have the tools to pursue a productive life after detention. “

The organizations requested that Bonner respond with his availability by this week. It was unclear if the meeting has been scheduled.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

New Just City Court Watch Report Urges Judges To Be More ‘Sensitive’ and ‘Neutral’

The latest observations from Just City’s Court Watch report say that while most of Shelby County’s judges are accessible, many need to work on their ability to “treat both the accused and the victim with dignity,” as well as with sensitivity.

Just City is a Memphis-based nonprofit that works for criminal justice reform. Its Court Watch is a project that aims to bring “transparency and accountability to the county’s criminal legal system” and reduce barriers to justice.

“We do that by publishing these reports to provide a glimpse into what happens at 201 Poplar daily,” said the organization.

Just City’s “Court Watch” report is composed of observations from volunteers, who watch and evaluate the judges in the criminal courtrooms. Judges are scored on a scale from one to four, with one being the worst and four being the best.

“This report, which combines court watch and data analysis, provides an overview of the performance of judges in Criminal and General Session courts at 201 Poplar Avenue since September 2022,” said Just City.

Some of the group’s key findings concluded that most judges received lower scores in sensitivity and neutrality. Their findings also raised concern surrounding extended duration cases and the “frequency of dismissed cases.”

When evaluating judges, volunteers are asked to consider questions such as “Did the judge give the appearance of neutrality?” and “Did the judge handle each case with the sensitivity warranted?”

After receiving 10 rubrics from the judges that the group focuses on, they begin compiling that information into their latest report. In the current report, volunteers observed judges Paula L. Skahan, Carolyn Wade Blackett, Jennifer J. Mitchell, Bill Anderson Jr., and Louis J. Montesi Jr.

Skahan received high marks in accessibility and “ability to hear,” with her lowest scores being in timeliness and sensitivity. Volunteers noted that Skahan was “kind, but firm” and “demonstrated genuine concern for people in her courtroom.” However, volunteers also believed that Skahan can improve on her sensitivity, and that she should be “less condescending.”

Volunteers noted that Blackett “runs an efficient, fast paced courtroom,” and applauded her clear communication skills. They also remarked that Blackett was “responsive to defendants who had questions.” While Blackett received high scores in accessibility, and neutrality, her lowest score was regarding appointment of a public defender. Volunteers also believed that Blackett could improve on her interactions with defendants and her sensitivity.

Mitchell scored high in neutrality and accessibility, with comments noting her ability to be “conscientious of defendants needing to return to jobs” and her ability to provide “thorough explanations.” According to volunteer scoring, Mitchell scored lowest in timeliness with comments saying she “could be more efficient getting through her docket.” They also urged Mitchell to “take less phone and coffee breaks.”

Judge Anderson is recorded as having a “great handling of courtroom,” and volunteers took note of his decision to “take times to explain things.” However, a former client noted that he could be “less condescending” and should “allow for second chances.”

In terms of a lasting impression, however, volunteers also said “at times it felt like the prosecutors had more control of the courtroom than the judge,” and that he could “make better use of his time.”

A former client also noted that court under Montesi was “very efficient and organized,” while volunteers said he excelled in having “clear communication in layman’s terms.” However, Montesi was urged to “treat Black and white defendants equally.” The report also said they observed that Montesi seemed to have a “mean demeanor towards everybody.”


The full report can be viewed here.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Just City’s ‘Court Watch’ Grades County Judges

Some of Shelby County’s criminal court judges “need to be more professional” and “less condescending,” according to Just City’s recent “Court Watch” report

Just City is a Memphis-based nonprofit that works for criminal justice reform. Its Court Watch is a project that aims to bring “transparency and accountability to the county’s criminal legal system” and reduce barriers to justice.

Though most of the judges were commended for their ability to “explain things well,” each of the four judges observed had attributes that volunteers believed they could improve on. Responses ranged from professionalism, tone, and overall courtroom energy.

Just City’s “Court Watch” report is composed of observations from volunteers, who watch and evaluate the judges in the criminal courtrooms. Judges are scored on a scale from one to four, with one being the worst and four being the best.

The rubric consists of questions such as “Did the judge give the appearance of neutrality,” “Were both the accused and victim treated fairly,” and “Did you have any issues getting in.”

While all four judges seemed to receive a four in “access,” this is the only place where all judges received a consistent high score.

Judge Lee V. Coffee scored relatively high in most areas, however his lowest score was in “ability to hear.” Coffee was commended on his ability to explain things thoroughly and his ability to control the courtroom. However, Just City volunteers believe that Coffee should “have more interaction with people,” and “give people more chances.” Coffee scored the highest out of the four judges in “timeliness.”

In terms of neutrality, Judge Chris Craft received the lowest score out of the judges being observed. While volunteers said that Craft was “friendly” and “efficient,” they also believe that Craft needs to “change his attitude.” A former client said that “he was repeatedly all over the place and disorganized.” Volunteers also observed that Craft was “blatantly disrespectful,” and that he “performs his job like he’s running a circus. Or a slaughterhouse.” 

The report also said that Craft “heavily factors race into his decisions and uses racially charged language.”

Judge Karen L. Massey received the highest score in “ability to hear,” with volunteers saying Massey “talks to you and not ‘at’ you,” and that “she’s a good listener.” Massey received lower scores when it came to her sensitivity and timeliness. A former client said “she can work on being on time, I never knew when I’d get out.” Another former client said that Massey can “work on her professionalism.” Volunteers said that Massey “has a very abrasive tone towards defendants,” and that she is “inconsistent in the way that she deals and judges individuals.”

Volunteers believe that Judge S. Ronald Lucchesi could be more consistent and can improve on expanding public defender appointments. On the report, Lucchesi is quoted as saying “ If you want a public defender, I can throw you in jail for a few days so you can qualify in this court.” While former clients believe that Lucchesi is fair and honest, others said that he needs to be more professional. Lucchesi is also noted as being inflexible and “either really kind, or really harsh.”

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

New Bail System Unveiled Here Hailed as One of the “Fairest in the Nation”

A new system unveiled here Thursday will transform the bail process in Shelby County next year, and advocates call the new process “one of the fairest in the nation.”

The new system comes after criminal justice reforms advocates like Just City, The Wharton Firm, the Official Black Lives Matter Memphis Chapter, and the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN), threatened to sue local officials late last year if the county did not stop bail practices “that violate the constitutional and statutory rights of people arrested in Shelby County,” a news release from the ACLU-TN said Thursday. 

The groups entered a mediation process with the county. They agreed to a new $2-million courtroom for bail hearings, promised in a resolution from the Shelby County Commission. With that promise in hand, Shelby County General Sessions Court Judges recently signed a new standing bail order for the county, an agreement that will set a new path for bail here when it goes into effect in February 2023.  

In the current system, judicial officers reach for money bail nearly 77 percent of the time, according to Josh Spickler, executive director of Just City. They do this even though state law mandates using money bail only as a last resort. The new system will help set bail on a case-by-case basis that could include no bail, lower bail, home monitoring, or even an unaffordable bail to keep someone in place to ensure a court appearance. 

In the new system, once a person is booked in to the Shelby County Jail, they’ll be interviewed by an official from Shelby County Pretrial Services. They’ll use a financial assessment tool to determine “an amount that is financially affordable for the individual,” reads the order. 

Within 12 hours of detention, a Judicial Commissioner will evaluate the person to see if they can be released on their own recognizance (meaning no money bail needed but a promise to appear at their court date), if they should be released with no money bail but with conditions (like at-home monitoring), or with money bail. 

A bail hearing with counsel will then be set in the new bail hearing courtroom to take place usually within the first 48 hours of detention and not to exceed 72 hours. Under the current system, a person could be held for weeks or longer without a bail hearing with counsel. 

The ACLU-TN said under the current system, “most people never had a bail hearing at all, ability to pay was not considered when bail was set leaving those who could not afford to pay detained indefinitely even if they were not a flight or safety risk, while those who faced the same charges but could afford to pay money bail were freed until trial.”

Numerous criminal advocacy groups, politicians, and individuals praised the move.

Here’s what they said: 

Andrea Woods, staff attorney with the ACLU Criminal Law Reform Project 

“With these changes, Shelby County has the opportunity to be a national leader for pretrial justice. These much-needed improvements are a testament to the power of local officials, advocates and community members working together to solve a problem. We applaud the county’s collaboration and leadership in ensuring that no one is needlessly confined to a jail cell, that everyone awaiting trial receives fair treatment, and that community well-being is supported through alternatives to incarceration.”

Josh Spickler, executive director of Just City

“Bail reform advocates from around the country are looking to Shelby County as an example of how a community can realize meaningful reform when forward-thinking leaders decide to collaborate instead of litigate. The entire Shelby County Commission, Mayor [Lee] Harris, and countless members of his administration rallied around this opportunity. We will soon have a smaller jail population, safer streets, and significant cost savings as a result.”

Stella Yarbrough, ACLU-TN legal director

 “Shelby County has taken a huge step away from wealth-based incarceration and toward a transparent system rooted in due process. This new bail system not only brings the county in line with the [U.S.] Constitution, it establishes one of the fairest bail systems in the nation, yielding an immense, positive impact on countless people’s lives.”

Alexander Wharton of The Wharton Law Firm

“I am pleased to have participated in a process where all interested parties and voices participated in changing our current bail setting system to comply with state law and the principles of the U.S. Constitution. This is an example of the ability of all parties working together to help solve problems within our system.”

Shahidah Jones of the Official Black Lives Matter Memphis Chapter

“As an abolitionist organization, we are cautiously optimistic about what this means as we move forward with implementation. We are most excited about the ability to collect data and to actually provide transparency about what happens within our current justice systems.”

Shelby County Attorney Marlinee Iverson

“Shelby County and its officials are invested in ensuring that every arrested person who enters the criminal justice system receives adequate constitutional protections and a fair process. The new bail hearing system reflects the commitment of local leaders, including Mayor Lee Harris and Chief Public Defender Phyllis Aluko, to equal treatment for all residents, regardless of their income.”

Willie Brooks, chairman of the Shelby County Board of Commissioners 

“The Shelby County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved changes to the bail system in order to promote equality, public safety, and to reduce the high costs of unnecessary pretrial incarceration. These forward-looking solutions reflect growing evidence that supportive interventions, rather than incarceration, promote positive outcomes in most cases.”

Shelby County District Attorney General-elect Steve Mulroy

“I look forward to working in support of these groundbreaking reforms and ensuring that my office only seeks money bail where needed for public safety. Pretrial detention should be the exception, not the rule.”

Louis Montesi, Presiding Judge General Sessions Criminal Court

“The judges of the General Sessions Criminal Court of Shelby County are proud to be a part of the bail reform changes to establish and ensure a fair, just, and equal system for pretrial release for persons charged with crimes with proper consideration for the presumption of innocence, due process of law and public safety.”

Marquita Brown, representative of the Official Black Lives Matter Memphis Chapter

“I am the supportive services lead for the people that are bailed out by our organization. My job is to assist with acquiring legal counsel, transportation to court dates, and stabilization. Reform was necessary to stop bail practices that violate the constitutional and statutory rights of people arrested in Shelby County. 

“These reforms are a great place to start, as this process institutes counsel for the individual and also speeds up the process by providing a bond hearing within 72 hours. The assistance of the bail calculator to determine what an individual can afford is also very important because all of the people we bail out cannot afford the full bail or the 10 percent that most bond companies require. This is an exciting moment in Shelby County history and I am looking forward to future changes.”

Categories
Letter From The Editor Opinion

Letter from an Editor: Criminal Justice Reform IRL

Once again, I have no opinions to share professionally. So I’m learning instead.

Steve Mulroy is set to be sworn in as Shelby County’s next district attorney general next week, after winning the seat in this month’s election and naming his transition team last week. Folks are chattering and wondering about what some of Mulroy’s “progressive” ideas on criminal justice will look like off the chalkboard and applied every day in Shelby County. I wanted to know, too, so I asked for professional help.

Josh Spickler, executive director of the criminal reform advocacy group Just City, is a member of Mulroy’s transition team. He has seen firsthand how the system works now and how we might see some of Mulroy’s ideas applied in the real world.

Memphis Flyer: What will some of the changes look like in reality?

Josh Spickler: The first thing to note is what’s not going to change. Steve is going to prioritize public safety and he is going to prioritize violent crime in this community. Steve campaigned on that, and everything he is doing and saying since the election is about that.

In terms of reforms and some of the day-to-day, visible changes, I think you’ll very quickly see, because of some good fortune and some timing, a bit of a different approach in pretrial detention with regard to the use of money bail. Steve campaigned on his willingness and desire to reform that.

Last week, the [Shelby County General Sessions Criminal Court] judges signed a standing bail order, which is really big news. I’m a bit biased, but it’s one of the best standing bail orders — definitely in Tennessee, maybe in the country. A standing bail order is a plan put in place and agreed upon by all judges in a jurisdiction. So, all of our General Sessions judges — who are the ones, mostly, in charge of how bail gets set — they’ve agreed to significantly change the way they do it. They agreed to have meaningful hearings any time unaffordable bail is being considered as the only means of protecting the community and ensuring the appearance of someone accused of a crime. They have agreed to have attorneys for both the state and the accused present at those hearings.

That’s where Steve’s office comes in right from the beginning. When he takes office, he is going to have a new responsibility with regard to setting bail. Steve has said in his campaign that he believes fewer people should be held on unaffordable money bail. So, if Steve and his assistant DAs follow through on his campaign promise, we’ll begin to see that in those bail hearings. Fewer people will be held in our jail simply because they can’t afford freedom. That’s a big one.

So someone commits a crime, is held in jail until an arraignment hearing, and is just released — with no bail — until their court date?

It will be based on what is best for the community and what a judicial commissioner decides is best for that person at the time. That will be determined after a hearing, which is something we don’t do currently. Currently, we are not considering all of the required factors and are defaulting to bail — a seemingly arbitrary dollar amount — almost 76 to 77 percent of the time in this current system when state law says the first thing that should be considered is release.

What other reforms will we begin to see IRL?

Steve has also committed to a Post Conviction Justice Unit. He won’t call it that [because] … he’s not just going to look at convictions … looking for wrongful convictions, like looking to overturn something [perhaps] with DNA, for example. Steve has pledged to also look at sentences that may be inappropriate, that might be far too punitive.

Anything else?

On racial disparities, he’s pledged to not only build an office that looks more like Shelby County, but to also understand why it is that outcomes continue to be different for people of color versus white people.

These areas will be his focus. There’s plenty of evidence to suggest that all of that leads to safer, healthier communities, and that’s the ultimate priority. Hopefully, any DA’s priority is to keep us safer, and that’s what Steve is going to do.

The Memphis Flyer is now seeking candidates for its editor position. Send your resume to hr@contemporary-media.com.

Categories
News Blog News Feature

Groups Threaten Lawsuit On Money Bail Reform

Several groups called Shelby County’s money bail system unconstitutional in a letter issued Tuesday and urged leaders to meet with them about the practice or face a lawsuit by year’s end. 

The letter is from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee (ACLUT-TN), Just City, and The Wharton Law Firm. It paints a picture of a broken system that favors those with money to get out of jail and disproportionately affects poor, Black, and disabled detainees.    

“Jailing people simply due to their inability to afford a sum of money is unconstitutional and harmful public policy,” said Andrea Woods, staff attorney with the ACLU’s Criminal Law Reform Project. “Shelby County officials should embrace this opportunity to remedy the county’s discriminatory, wealth-based detention practices. We would rather see smart systems fixes now than be forced to bring these issues to court.”

The letter says pre-trial release is a fundamental right under the state and federal constitutions. Tennessee law requires judges to treat money bail as a “last resort,” it says. Except for “extreme circumstances,” all criminal suspects have the right to some sort of conditional release from jail before their trials. 

Shelby County’s system, however, keeps “hundreds of people” detained because they cannot afford bail. This can lead to loss of employment, housing, education, health care, and child custody, the groups said. 

The county’s current pre-trial system can hold a person for “weeks or longer” without a bail hearing with counsel, according to the groups. Ability to pay is not considered when bail is set, “leaving those who cannot afford to pay detained indefinitely, even if they are not a flight or safety risk, while those who face the same charges but can afford to pay money bail are freed until trial.”

“Because of this community’s dependence on money bail, the Shelby County Jail is full of people who cannot pay for their freedom,” Josh Spickler, executive director of Just City, said in a statement. “There are proven alternatives to this counterproductive system, tools and policies that have worked in other cities just like Memphis to reduce crime, save money, and help people.

“These methods work, but they require leadership. Today, we are inviting Shelby County leaders to join us for a long-overdue conversation about safe and effective alternatives to the money bail system. We hope they’ll join us.”

The letter threatens litigation and demands reform for the county’s bail system. It says the groups “prefer to work with you to resolve our concerns but stand ready to explore other options” if the county does take action. 

That action — an answer to a meeting request from the groups — needs to take place before December 31st. If not, “we have no choice” but to file a lawsuit.  

“We cannot and will not sit idly by and let this easily corrected problem persist,” reads the letter. 

Instead of the current system, which the letter says “does not promote court appearance,” the groups want (among other things):

• bail hearings no later than 24 hours after a person’s arrest

• no money bail set unless proof exists that the person will not return for trial without it

• a consideration of ability to pay for bail before it is set

• affordability for bail means the person can pay the bail amount within 24 hours without borrowing money

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

Judge Lipman Oversees New COVID Protections for Jailed Inmates

It isn’t a Get Out of Jail card, but it’s one of the next best things. On Friday, US. District Judge Sheryl Halle Lipman of Tennessee’s Western District approved an agreement between civil rights advocates and the Shelby County Sheriff’s office that will improve health conditions in jail and protect people from the ravages of COVID-19.

Judge Lipman

The agreement guarantees that the jail will implement rigorous monitoring and reporting; additional jail inspections; improved airflow and ventilation measures to keep people safe from airborne transmission of COVID-19; better quality protective equipment for people being detained in the jail; continued efforts to expedite release for those who are disabled and medically vulnerable; improved social distancing; and other enhancements that will better protect people living and working in the facility.

Judge Lipman  stated from the bench that she believed it to be in the community’s interest to stop the spread of COVID and that the measures put in place in the facility are designed to do that. She said the point is to get as many safety features into the jail as possible and keep detainees as safe as possible. She went on to say that containing the spread of coronavirus helps within the community as well as in the facility, and that the effort put in to reach and protect the safety of the detainees is in the public interest and critically important.

The agreement was reached in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee; the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation; Just City; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; and Memphis attorneys Brice Timmons and Steve Mulroy on behalf of people incarcerated at the Shelby County Jail.

The lawsuit followed a court order that urged the jail to address numerous public health lapses identified after two expert inspectors — one appointed by the court —  issued reports expressing alarm at the tactics employed at the jail to contain the virus. Among the  conditions the inspectors uncovered at the jail were a failure to test new arrestees, even those clearly displaying COVID-19 symptoms; open airflow between areas of the facility where COVID-positive and quarantined people were detained and areas where others not yet exposed to the virus were detained; a lack of fresh masks; staff members wearing masks below their chins when speaking; and inadequate availability of cleaning supplies, hand sanitizer, and soap.

Among the plaintiffs in the case at high risk of serious illness or death from contracting  contract COVID-19 were several  pretrial detainees — one with progressive multiple sclerosis and heart disease dependent on an immunosuppressant; another with diabetes and hypertension; and another with hypertension and an irregular heartbeat, who previously had a heart attack. 

These plaintiffs had alleged that the jail temporarily made improvements to certain conditions in anticipation of forthcoming  inspections by a court-appointed inspector and knowingly allowed those improvements to lapse shortly after the inspections occurred, putting the lives of those who live and work at the facility at risk.

“This case and agreement shine a light on conditions in the Shelby County Jail and how officials there are responding to the COVID-19 crisis,” said Andrea Woods, staff attorney with the ACLU’s Criminal Law Reform Project. “While the work will continue, we applaud the court’s approval and commitment to ensuring that inspections and other monitoring continue until the pandemic is over.” 

“This agreement could quite literally mean the difference between life and death for our clients and many others who live and work at the Shelby County Jail, and in the wider Memphis community,” said Stella Yarbrough, ACLU of Tennessee staff attorney. “Far too many people are held in conditions that daily threaten their health, safety, and human dignity, especially during this pandemic, and we are relieved that conditions at the jail will now be improved.”

Josh Spickler, executive director of Just City, stated, “In Shelby County, the number of presumed innocent people being held in cages is extraordinarily high. This settlement will bring some much-needed accountability to those responsible for their well-being, but the real work is only beginning — we must break our community’s addiction to pretrial detention.”

University of Memphis law professor and former Shelby County Commissioner Steve Mulroy, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers, said, “This case sparked jail improvements and continued monitoring which would not have occurred without our filing. It’s helped protect the health of thousands of Shelby Countians, most of whom have not been convicted of any crime.”

Categories
News News Blog

Local Groups Weigh In on the Biden Administration

CHOICES’ Comprehensive Care Center

As the Biden Administration begins the long process of unifying the country, local nonprofits are gearing up for the work that needs to be done.

“We’re cautiously hopeful, you know,” says Commute Options program manager Sylvia Crum.

“I don’t know how long it’ll take for it to really start becoming apparent of what impact we will get to see right here in Memphis, but I’m really pleased that the administration is putting climate change on the forefront and saying, ‘We’ve got to do something to address this.’”

Commute Options, a nonprofit that works to promote alternative commuting methods within the city of Memphis, launched a bike commuting training program late last year. The program, which teaches Memphians how to commute through the city using biking or public transportation, is the first of many planned moves by the organization in 2021.

“We’ve been gathering a very lovely group of volunteers who are so excited to think about how we could help — in a safe and socially distanced way — encourage people who might want to try bicycling for transportation and show off the ability to do that.”

The nonprofit health advocate CHOICES has also begun the year strong. Its new comprehensive care center, which opened last fall, has been accepting patients throughout the pandemic, increasing volume in the latter half of 2020. The new center has allowed the group to expand to prenatal care and birth, something that director of external affairs Katy Leopard calls the “last piece of the puzzle”.

“As CHOICES, we wanted to be able to help people no matter what their choices were around a pregnancy. And so, it really makes sense that people needed to have more autonomy and how they give birth and the birth process,” says Leopard. “Having an out-of-hospital birth center environment that’s led by midwives, where people giving birth have more autonomy and choice, was really important to us. It wasn’t available in Memphis or anywhere near us, so we really felt like our community needed that.”

Just City executive director Josh Spickler says that while not much has changed for the organization with the new administration, they are still feeling the effects of the Trump administration.

“For the most part, our issues are pretty local,” he says. “A couple of exceptions would be that at the end of the last administration, there was a rush to execute five or six people. Federal executions had been on hold for years and years, and the Trump administration brought them back knowing that the Biden administration was going to have to work to stop them again.”

“I would hope that the death penalty becomes an issue, at the congressional level,” he adds. “We just don’t have the resources locally, but that’s one thing that I would hope would change because the state of Tennessee has really shown no interest in doing anything.”