Categories
News

Jury Begins Deliberations in Edmund Ford Trial

“The tapes are not married to anybody. The tapes do not
have a plea agreement.”

With those words, federal prosecutor Larry Laurenzi wrapped
up the government’s case Tuesday against former City Councilman Edmund Ford,
whose fate is now in the hands of the seven women and five men on the jury.

During six days of testimony, prosecutors presented
videotapes of four payments from undercover informant Joe Cooper to Ford.
Laurenzi said Cooper was merely “a tape recorder” and his criminal record and
desire to cut a deal with prosecutors should not distract jurors.

“Joe Cooper is not the proof,” he said.

Laurenzi pointed out that Ford and Cooper get right down to
business with a minimum of small talk – and without the profane language of many
of the Tennessee Waltz tapes featuring Ford’s brother, former state senator John
Ford.

“He (Edmund Ford) had to accept the money knowing that it
was given to him for his political influence,” Laurenzi said. “It wasn’t the FBI
or (FBI Agent) Dan Netemeyer, it was greed. It was just greed.”

Michael Scholl, Ford’s attorney, said “this whole case is
about manipulation” and jurors were shown only “snippets” of tapes cast in the
most incriminating light.

“It should be shocking to watch how you can take little
pieces of a conversation and set up anybody,” Scholl said.

However, he also argued that Ford was the victim of
entrapment, which seemed to concede that he had taken the money as the tapes
show.

Scholl reminded jurors that Ford and his wife Myrna, who
testified in the trial, are a “mom and pop operation” in the family funeral
home.

“Not only do you have to believe that Mr. Ford is lying,
you’ve got to believe that his wife got up here and lied, too,” he said.

In his instructions to the jury, U.S. District Judge Samuel
H. Mays told jurors they must not be influenced by sympathy.

Jurors were given detailed instructions about entrapment.
Federal courts have ruled that a bribe need not be explicitly stated as a “quid
pro quo.” The defendant must know that the payment is made in return for
official acts, but a certain amount of subtlety is acceptable. The Ford
videotapes show him taking $100 bills as Cooper and Ford discuss pending
decisions of the City Council or other official actions.