Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Kidnapped for Christ

When director Kate Logan was a film school freshman, she set out to make a documentary about the Christian youth camp Escuela Caribe. The young Evangelical thought she was making a feel-good movie about the camp, which brought troubled teens to the mountains of the Dominican Republic. But what the 20-year-old film student found during her seven weeks at the camp would shock her to her core and begin a seven-year saga that would culminate with Kidnapped For Christ, the 2014 Outflix Film Festival’s opening film.

Escuela Caribe is part of a chain of similar camps that promise parents that they can change their teenagers’ behavior for the better — for a hefty fee. But the reality is much uglier than advertised. The film opens with kids’ stories of being kidnapped from their beds in the middle of the night by unknown thugs and taken, sometimes in chains, to the airport against their will, often while their parents looked on. Once out of the country, they are subjected to a program of brainwashing that will be familiar to anyone who has ever read about the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Escuela Caribe had been in existence for 35 years by the time Logan spent her fateful six weeks there, and at some point in the past, the place had gone from Bible study camp to Stanford Prison Experiment. Committing your child to a work camp is a pretty extreme measure for a parent to take, but none of the kids Logan interviews seem messed up enough to warrant it. There’s Beth, who claims she is there to cure panic attacks; Tai, whose offenses seem like nothing more than run-of-the-mill teenage hellraising; and David, a 17-year-old honor student who was shipped off after coming out to his parents as gay.

Kidnapped for Christ

Kidnapped for Christ is like a more paranoid version of Morgan Jon Fox’s landmark documentary This Is What Love In Action Looks Like. As stories of brutal abuse at the camp proliferated, Logan’s vision of her project changes until she makes a fateful decision to become involved in the story by attempting to rescue David from the camp. The story’s unexpected twists and turns make it one of the more satisfying, and harrowing, documentaries of the year.

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Outflix Film Festival

The Outflix Film Festival enters its 17th year on a strong note, coming off its most successful edition ever with more and better films portraying the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender perspective. This year’s entries topped 300 films, up more than 50 percent from last year, reflecting the festival’s growing profile. “It’s great for me, because I love to watch films,” says festival director Will Batts.

The annual festival is a fund-raiser for the Memphis Gay and Lesbian Community Center where Batts is executive director. “We have to have a really diverse lineup, because we serve a really diverse community,” he says. “We want to make sure we have women’s films, transgender films, and films with people of color who are leads. We want to make sure that the whole community can see themselves on the screen.”

Outflix was started in 1997 by Brian Pera, an acclaimed Memphis filmmaker. “He started it as a kind of experimental theater project,” Batts says.

Early in its existence, the festival was held on the campus at the University of Memphis before moving briefly to commercial theaters and then lying fallow for a few years. “We started it back up in 2005, which is actually how I got involved in the center,” says Batts.

After one year at the former Memphis Media Co-Op and another at the now-defunct Downtown Muvico theater, the festival found its permanent home at the recently remodeled Malco Ridgeway cinema. “We’ve been there through the transition and the remodel. It’s great. The only bad thing is that there are fewer seats now in the theaters, so we’re seeing more movies sell out.”

Out in the Night

Batts says that during his decade at the festival he has had a front-row seat for the technological transition that has affected every level of the movie industry. “The first couple of years, everything came in on VHS, so we had cases of VHS tapes. But this year, probably 95 percent of the films were digitally submitted. That means that a lot more filmmakers are getting their films in front of us. So we get a lot more variety.”

The weeklong festival begins on Friday,September 5th and runs for one week, screening 19 narrative features and documentaries. This year’s opening night film is Kidnapped For Christ, directed by Kate S. Logan.

“It tells the story of something we deal with at the community center all the time,” Batts Says, “which is this belief that gay and lesbian people are somehow damaged in some way and need to be fixed; parents immersed in this culture that tells them that their kids are bad or wrong or sinful or whatever, and they need to be sent off to some camp in the middle of nowhere to beat the gay out of them. We want to get the message out that this is really harmful, and it continues to this day.”

Among the feature-length movies will be shorts, screening both before the features and as part of a shorts program on Sunday evening. “I especially love short films,” Batts says. “There’s something really powerful about telling an entire story in five minutes. “You can watch some of them on YouTube, but that’s just not the same experience as sitting in a theater full of people watching a really powerful short film.”

Much has changed about film and television’s vision of homosexuality in the 17 years since Outflix started, but there’s still a long way to go. “I think there are more accurate portrayals of LGBT people, but it still hasn’t permeated the mainstream,” Batts says. “We’re moving closer to reality, but we’re not quite there yet. The films we show at Outflix are more real, because they’re made by LGBT filmmakers and they’re about and starring LBGT actors who know the experience. They’re not going to tone it down for an audience who won’t understand them. Some of the films are more open about sexuality, some of them are open about what it means to be transgender or intersexed, so they’re educational in a way. Some of the films are about injustice and intolerance. It’s a much more real portrayal of LGBT people. We don’t get to see ourselves portrayed on the big screen as real people, warts and all. And that’s why Outflix exists.”

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

An Exaggerated Take on Sisterhood

Lisa See has done it again. And depending on your taste for the sentimental, this could be delightful or torturous.

Snowflower and the Secret Fan — adapted from See’s novel — is the story of four women: Snowflower (Gianna Jun) and Lily (Bingbing Li) live in 19th-century China; Sophia and Nina (also played by Jun and Li) live in present-day Shanghai.

Director Wayne Wang (The Joy Luck Club) wastes no time getting into the thick of the melodrama. Sophia falls into a coma after a nasty cycling accident and the tragedy brings her recent falling-out with lifelong friend Nina to the fore. From there, we are led through the development of Nina and Sophia’s relationship, braided with the similarly fraught story of Snowflower and Lily.

The double casting of Jun and Li links the stories from past and present. “It’s about the old days,” says Sophia about the Snowflower and Lily saga, “but I think it’s really about us.” After simultaneous foot binding ceremonies, Snowflower and Lily are matched up as laotong, symbolic sisters united for eternity. In perfect symmetry, Nina and Sophia are also determined to be laotong and share this sacred bond, which even comes with its own secret language, nushu or “women’s script.” Snowflower and Lily pass news of their tumultuous lives, written between the folds of a traditional Chinese fan.

Both laotong pairs experience a range of joys and sorrows together. Marriage, pregnancy, death, and divorce are set against the backdrop of their undying affection, butting up against one another with the cumulative effect of a Lifetime movie. Foot binding, ever-present throughout the film, is never engaged in a meaningful way. Instead, it’s hung out as a grim ornament lending more empty drama to the story.

The bond of laotong is also strangely off-putting. It comes across as an overly possessive friendship. It transcends marriage. Biological sisterhood has the gravitas of pen pals by comparison.

But it also works perfectly within the schema of See’s mawkish pseudo-feminist best-sellers. Without much of interest or substance to back up these lifelong friendships, the women are more in love with the idea of sisterhood than anything else. Their laotong bond becomes an exercise in developing hyper-significant relationships. Predictably, their friendship only falters for all-too-perfect reasons — when one of the women selflessly lets go as she feels she is too much of a burden on her sister.

The film is nicely shot, with two cleanly interwoven storylines, and is by no means difficult to look at. And while See’s romanticized indulgence in the ultra-feminine is tiresome, her track record of best-sellers is impressive.

Snowflower was manufactured to jerk the tears out of you, and, evidently, enough people are looking for a good reason to cry these days. If you like doing your crying in the dark and you aren’t too picky about the plot, I’ve got a movie ticket to sell you.

Snow Flower and the Secret Fan
Opening Friday, August 5th
Ridgeway Four

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Buck

The documentary Buck, a portrait of horse trainer Buck Brannaman, who inspired Nicholas Evans’ 1995 novel The Horse Whisperer and served as a consultant on Robert Redford’s film version, might be the most surprising film I’ve seen this year.

An appreciative profile of a “horse whisperer” was not something I was excited to see, but first-time director Cindy Meehl’s film, which won the audience award for docs at this year’s Sundance Film Festival, takes on the no-nonsense personality of its subject, a soft-spoken man who dismisses any mystical import others might apply to his skills: “A lot of people want it all to be fuzzy and warm and cosmic,” Brannaman says. “But it’s no different with a horse than with a kid.”

Brannaman is full of folksy wisdom. Stuff like: “A lot of times rather than helping people with horse problems, I’m helping horses with people problems.” But he backs it up with a patient approach to horse training that eschews the concept of “breaking” the animals and the violence that term suggests.

Buck is filled with admiring testimonials from ranchers and other trainers, along with Redford, who describes how Brannaman became a bigger part of his film than he had intended. But Meehl finds the real story rooted in Brannaman’s past as a childhood rope-trick performer with a violently abusive backstage father. As a small child, he confesses, he was so terrified of his father that he would beg his mother not to leave for work.

Meehl withholds this biographical information for a while and finally incorporates it in pieces, the film deriving much of its meaning from the contrast and connection between Brannaman’s rough childhood and his unusually gentle training style. You see why Brannaman takes the way people treat the horses they own or are training as a revelation of their own character and why he seems to identify so much with an animal often trained through aggressive, physical tactics.

And while he isn’t demonstrative about it, Brannaman is willing to make the connection explicit, comparing his own fearful reticence as a child meeting a foster parent for the first time to his approach with horses: “It’s like a colt that’s had some trouble. You don’t have to do much to make them suspicious. Just even move a little bit in a way they don’t understand and — that quick — they think they need to save themselves.”

Meehl’s delicate hand at using this material makes Buck deeply affecting without straining too hard. Its lessons about patience and compassion feel legitimate.

And Meehl smartly — or, perhaps, luckily — steers the film to a tough final act, where Brannaman encounters a troubled colt — “a problem child … you can’t hold it against him for how his life has been” — that might be unreachable.

Buck

Opening Friday, July 1st

Ridgeway Four

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Everything Must Go

Much like Adam Sandler in Paul Thomas Anderson’s Punch-Drunk Love, Will Ferrell’s performance in the new indie drama Everything Must Go isn’t a case of playing against type as much as tweaking it.

Adapted from the Raymond Carver short story “Why Don’t You Dance,” this first feature from writer-director Dan Rush casts Ferrell in a role that might the realistic flipside to his over-the-top Old School character, the drunk Frank the Tank.

Here Ferrell is Nick Halsey, a relapsing alcoholic who returns home after getting fired from his corporate job to find his belongings on the front lawn, the locks changed, and his wife gone. Soon he finds the couple’s joint banking and credit card accounts cancelled too.

Nick takes up residence in the front lawn, sitting in an easy chair, working his way through six packs, and odd sight that catches the sympathetic but cautious eye of a new neighbor, a pregnant woman (played by Rebecca Hall) awaiting the delayed arrival of her husband.

Before long, Nick decides to turn his eviction into a yard sale, a high-concept gambit that provides the film’s title and literalizes the notion of “taking inventory” of one’s life. One item that pops up is an old high-school yearbook, which contains a now-poignant inscription from a former female classmate that provokes Nick to track her down. The woman, now a struggling single mom, is played, beautifully, by Laura Dern in a striking cameo doesn’t go quite where most viewers will expect it to.

The Dern cameo fits a muted, effective drama nailed in place by a couple of subtle character revelation depth charges that arrive late and reorient the viewer’s perspective on Nick and the film.

Ferrell finds a perfect balance here between letting his comedic bent tease out the absurdity of the situation while still playing the role straight.

Everything Must Go

Opening Friday, May 13th

Ridgeway Four

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Man in the Mirror

The title of the documentary I Am is neither an affirmation of individual empowerment nor a reference to the biblical imperative stated in Exodus. Rather, it is an answer to the question: What is wrong with the world?

The “I” in question is filmmaker Tom Shadyac. Known for lowbrow comedic fare such as Ace Ventura, Liar Liar (a favorite of mine), Patch Adams, and Bruce Almighty, Shadyac isn’t someone you’d expect to make a movie asking philosophical questions about the nature of the world and what man is doing wrong in it. Shadyac admits as much himself.

Shadyac lived large in Hollywood until a serious bicycle accident left him with a post-concussion syndrome with side effects that included constant ringing in his ears, massive mood swings, and depression to the point of contemplation of suicide.

Shadyac says he was done with life. It gave him a sense of clarity and purpose though: What did he want to say before he died? He felt that the world he had been living was a lie and that he might have actually been helping to destroy the world, through his consumerism and drive for recognition at the expense of others.

But then his physical pain subsided, and he returned to a point of health where he could live normally again. He sold his property and moved into a more modest abode. And he got a film crew together and made a movie whereby he would ask some serious thinkers — Howard Zinn, Desmond Tutu, Noam Chomsky, David Suzuki, and Lynne McTaggart, among others — what they thought was wrong with the world, and what we could do about it.

His philosophical journey takes him near the deep waters tread by Robert Pirsig in his all-time great Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, where slavishness to science and reason is found to be part of the problem of modern man’s ills. “Science is just a story,” Shadyac proffers. The story it tells is that the world is a machine, and individuals are separate objects rather than interconnected beings.

Strangely, though, the film uses science to convince the audience that it has been misinformed by science. I Am essentially tries to answer if humanity’s basic nature is to cooperate or dominate. It investigates generally accepted ideas on evolution and less studied theories on the biological response people feel to helping others and the role of the heart as the emotional intelligence center versus the brain — along with fairly trippy ideas about argon gas in the air we breath. It’s like a good NOVA scienceNOW episode about researchers trying to prove the existence of the soul.

If its ideas are intriguing, I Am isn’t necessarily great cinema (fittingly, I suppose, in light of the filmmaker’s oeuvre). Many images seem like they’re culled from stock imagery: lots of birds flying across the sky.

For Memphians, the film holds special significance. The filmmaker is the son of Richard Shadyac Sr., a co-founder of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and CEO for years of its fund-raising arm, ALSAC. (Tom is also brother to the current ALSAC CEO, Richard Jr.). “If I have any generosity, it’s because of him,” the filmmaker says of his father.

The film talks about St. Jude and Shadyac Sr., saying the culture at the hospital he helped create is a model that should spread.

The filmmaker interviews his father before his passing in 2009. Interestingly, in asking why the St. Jude model hasn’t become widespread, Shadyac Sr. answers that it’s easier said than done. He compares it to a church service, where there is an outpouring of love for an hour and a half a week and then everyone goes about their typical uninvolved lives for the rest of the week. We behave one way on Sunday and another on Monday. For it to be otherwise would be unrealistic, Tom’s father tells him.

St. Jude battles against the “Sunday-only” mentality by institutionalizing that feeling one gets at church. In other words, St. Jude is a pragmatic solution to the problem that humankind isn’t as charitable as it should be.

Opens Friday, May 13th

Ridgeway Four