Categories
News The Fly-By

Memphis Animal Services Begins Adopting Out Dogs From Stray Area

Last Friday afternoon, most of the 27 kennels in Memphis Animal Services’ (MAS) stray area were full. There were lots of pit bulls with wiggly butts and wagging tails, and there was a solemn Rottweiler and a well-groomed, fluffy, white dog. And there were a few energetic mutts of questionable heritage.

Before April 1st, most of these dogs wouldn’t have stood a chance since animals in the stray area of the shelter were not available for adoption. But MAS has finally ended its long-standing policy banning the public from adopting dogs from the stray area.

“We’re getting in some really good animals. [Before we opened the stray area], the animals in stray would sometimes be moved to Healthy Hold. But sometimes, they wouldn’t get that opportunity,” said MAS Administrator James Rogers.

Bianca Phillips

A dog in the shelter’s stray area last week

Healthy Hold is a sort of intermediate area, where dogs go as they await their move to the adoption area. There are 57 cages in Healthy Hold. The adoption area, which features animals that shelter staff has deemed “adoptable” based on temperament and health, has 72 cages. Before this month, the public was only allowed to adopt animals from the adoption area. In fact, unless one was looking for a lost pet, members of the public were banned from even entering the stray area.

The stray area was closed to the public in 2010 by former MAS Administrator Matt Pepper. At that time, MAS was located in an aging facilty on Tchulahoma, and Pepper told the Memphis Animal Services Advisory Board meeting back then that separating “adoptable” dogs from stray dogs would help prevent the spread of diseases, since some animals in the stray area were unhealthy. That policy carried over into the new facility on Appling City Cove under Rogers’ leadership.

But rescue groups and animal shelter reform advocates have been pushing MAS to reopen the stray area for adoptions since it closed. They say that many of the dogs in the stray area are adoptable and need to be given a chance.

“We are pleased that voices of animal welfare advocates in the local community are being heard and that quality pets being held in the stray area are being rescued/adopted from this area to become beloved family pets,” said Memphis Pets Alive Executive Director Linda Baxter. “If animals cannot be seen, they cannot be adopted.”

Members of the nonprofit Memphis Pets Alive go into the shelter each Tuesday, photograph every animal, and post those pictures on memphispetsalive.org and their Facebook page in an effort to better market the animals. They’ve recently been allowed to begin photographing the animals in the stray area.

Because some animals in the stray area could have serious health problems or show signs of aggression, Rogers said that not all of the animals in that area may be adopted. Once a person selects a dog from the stray area, shelter staff will assess the dog to ensure it’s safe to adopt.

“We make sure before we allow a pet to be adopted that we have vetted and temperament-tested the pet,” Rogers said.

By opening the stray area, Rogers says he’s hoping the shelter can improve its adoption rates.

Cindy Sanders of Community Action for Animals has been pushing for the stray area to be opened for years.

“This will definitely drive up adoption rates. It will save the lives of animals,” Sanders said. “But my question is, why did it take MAS years to get these changes made? Thousands of animals died before they were ever allowed to be seen. I’m thankful this is happening now, but it should have happened years ago.”

Sanders suggested that the fact that it’s an election year could have been a factor in the city’s decision to open the stray area.

“While we’re thankful for this, we hope that this is a true attitude of progressive change and not just [Mayor A C Wharton’s] way of stumping for votes,” Sanders said.

Categories
News News Blog

Animal Advisory Board Discusses Missing Dogs, Shelter Surgery Backlog, and More

So far in 2015, two dogs have gone missing from the Memphis Animal Services (MAS) property, according to MAS Director James Rogers. One escaped through a hole in the fence on the front lawn of the shelter property on Appling City Cove, and the other missing dog remains a mystery.

James Rogers

“I can’t answer what happened to that dog,” Rogers told the MAS Advisory Board at their quarterly meeting at the Benjamin L. Hooks Central Library on Wednesday night.

The dog was checked into the shelter, but it’s no longer there. Yet it wasn’t recorded as being adopted. Rogers said he has spent hours combing through surveillance video to find out what happened, but he said there is still more video to watch. As for the dog that slipped through the fence, Rogers reported that animal control officers are on the lookout for the dog. The hole has been repaired, but he said there’s currently a ban on shelter animals on the front lawn until the city’s General Services division can do a thorough investigation of any areas of fence that may be compromised.

Rogers also reported that the shelter is a couple days behind on completing spay/neuter surgeries for adoptable animals. He said the shelter clinic is short-staffed and that the shelter is adopting out pets faster than they can keep up with surgeries. The board discussed the possibility of allowing rescue groups to take unspayed/unneutered shelter pets so long as they promised to have the procedure done elsewhere. Shelter policy currently doesn’t allow unaltered animals to leave the facility since the city has a mandatory spay/neuter ordinance. 

Some shelter reform advocates in attendance expressed support for the policy change, but they emphasized the importance of shelter staff following up with rescue groups to ensure the surgeries were performed. Board member Jill Madajczyk, the city’s deputy human resources director, suggested the city attorney’s office should draft a proposal on the policy change before the next MAS Advisory Board meeting. It would have to be approved by the Memphis City Council before the change could be instituted.

The board also discussed a proposal to allow rescue groups to foster animals that are being held at the shelter for court cases. Animals involved in abuse and neglect cases are currently held at the shelter while the person charged awaits a court date and throughout the trial. But if the proposal goes through, rescue groups could house those pets in their homes or facilities. If the person charged in the case is found guilty, the rescue group could keep the animal.

In his quarterly report, Rogers announced that, in the past 90 days, the shelter has had more live releases (adoptions, return-to-owner) than euthanasias. The shelter has a live release rate of 62 percent so far this year. Critics of the shelter often point out that live releases are up and euthanasias are down because the shelter is taking in significantly less animals than it did several years ago when the euthanasia rate was much higher. But at Wednesday night’s meeting, Rogers said he believed intake rates were down because the city was “making in-roads into reducing the animal population.”

“I wanted to know why the intake rate was down, so I called Bartlett and Collierville [animal shelters], and they are also having lower intake,” Rogers said.

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

What They Said (January 22, 2015) …

Greg Cravens

About Chris Davis’ post, “A Closer Look at the Satanic School Bus” …

I question how long the devil would last inside a junior high school bus.

CL Mullins

More and more, WMC’s news lately consists of junk stories like this one and news “ripped-from-the-Twitter.” One wonders what kind of audience they’re trying to attract.

MichaelC

About Toby Sells’ cover story, “The Brady Bunch” …

“… 43 percent of wrongful convictions in 2012 were attributed to prosecutorial misconduct.” It bears repeating. Our criminal justice system is off the rails.

Jeff

About Bianca Phillips’ story, “Shelter Kills Dog That Had Guaranteed Adopter” …

The six “mistakes” noted in the article are just the ones that people were able to document. There are likely many more of the same “mistakes” that have not been verified. Many healthy, adoptable strays are killed on the morning of their due-out date before the shelter opens to the public, robbing them of any possible chance for adoption. Many of those animals are never even seen by the public.

James Rogers likes to tout his adoption numbers, but adoptions would be significantly higher if Memphis Animal Shelter (MAS) allowed adoptable animals to live longer than three days. Mayor Wharton says that he wants Memphis to be a “progressive” city. Yet he allows MAS to be run by someone with no sheltering experience, who promotes employees who have had discipline and policy violation issues and who continues to use antiquated, outdated policies that progressive shelters abandoned years ago.

Memphis will never be a progressive city until MAS has an experienced shelter director who uses current, progressive shelter processes and works with the community to provide every opportunity for healthy, adoptable shelter animals to find a new home.

Jcs

Thank you for your coverage of this story. Every incident mentioned is well-documented. It is more than obvious that no attempt is being made to change operational procedures at MAS. It is well beyond time for Mayor Wharton to publicly and specifically address the citizens of Memphis regarding these atrocities and offer a plan to immediately correct all problems.

Midtown Maven

About Louis Goggans post, “Former U of M Provost Ralph Faudree Dies” …

Dr. Faudree was one of the reasons that I am proud to have earned my first college degree, a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, in 1986, from Memphis State University (now the University of Memphis). At that time, women were rarely seen in the halls of the math department, much less in upper division classes. Under Dr. Faudree’s leadership, my advisor Tom Caplinger, shepherded me successfully to degree completion and my admission to the Law School at the University of Memphis.

Julie Byrd

Ralph Faudree was a brilliant scholar and terrific administrator. He was the foundation of the U of M for many years and will be missed by those who worked for and with him.

LesMiserableTiger

About Bruce VanWyngarden’s Letter From the Editor, “New Year’s Notebook” …

After reading the above, I am reminded of an old saying: “In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is King.”

Ichabod McCrane

“In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is King,” he sneers as he swishes open his raincoat.

Mia S. Kite

Mia S. Kite, Where else does the imagery in your head go?

Ichabod McCrane

Ichabod, Well, I can see that you don’t need such a big raincoat.

Mia S. Kite

Categories
News The Fly-By

Shelter Kills Dog That Had Guaranteed Adopter

At least six times in the past year, Memphis Animal Services (MAS) has euthanized an animal that had already been claimed for adoption.

This past weekend, animal advocates gathered at Union and Cooper to protest the latest such incident, which occurred in mid-December.

“We want to stop the clerical errors, which is what [MAS administrator] James Rogers calls them. These are not clerical errors. A dog dying that could have been adopted is not a clerical error,” said Jan Courtney of Save Our Shelter (S.O.S.) Memphis, the group that organized Sunday’s protest.

Bianca Phillips

S.O.S. Memphis protests the shelter’s mistake.

The most recent situation began on December 16th, when Vickie Carter noticed a pit bull mix being attacked by two other dogs in a neighborhood near the animal shelter. She pulled her car over to break up the dog fight.

“My car door was open, and the dog [that was being attacked] jumped into my car and hopped into the backseat. So now I have this pit bull in my car, and I didn’t know what to do with him,” Carter said.

She wound up taking him to MAS, assuming that since the dog was in the neighborhood, his owner may check the shelter to find him. She told the intake clerk that she would leave the dog there for the three days that a surrendered animal has to stay, and if no one claimed him, she would adopt him. The dog’s review date (the day they’re either euthanized or placed up for adoption) was December 20th.

On that day, Carter returned to the shelter, only to be informed that the dog had already been euthanized.

Rogers admitted that the shelter was at fault. He said the technician on duty that day failed to input Carter’s request to adopt. He said a fact-finding hearing will be held and necessary disciplinary action will be taken.

“Steps are in place to ensure this does not happen. The technician failed to follow those steps,” Rogers said in an emailed statement.

Such clerical errors are nothing new, according to records kept by members of S.O.S. Memphis. Back in February, a dog named Josie had a card on her cage that showed she had an adopter, yet her name was not taken off the euthanasia list, and she was mistakenly put to sleep.

“I had a personal experience with this,” Courtney said. “I emailed MAS about a dog on May 23rd, two days after the dog had been picked up [as a stray]. I specified that someone was interested in this dog. But on the dog’s review date, I emailed MAS to see if I could pick up the dog. I received an email back that the dog had already been euthanized, and they claimed they did not receive my original email.”

In August, a rescuer expressed intent to adopt a 2-month-old puppy, but like in Carter’s case, no record of that was made and the puppy was killed. The same thing happened with a 4-month-old puppy in October. In September, a rescuer’s intent to adopt a German shepherd was recorded, but the dog was euthanized anyway.

Carter said she would have never taken the dog she picked up in December to MAS had she known that the shelter had a history of clerical errors.

“This was my first experience with MAS. I had no idea about the horror stories that go on there. Now I’m learning that the same thing has happened over and over and over,” Carter said. “Now I’m going to start doing everything I can to get things changed there. Not every animal can be saved, but they can at least try.”

Categories
News The Fly-By

New Animal Shelter Hours Are Controversial

Last week, Memphis Animal Services (MAS) began opening its doors seven days a week, a move shelter director James Rogers believes will lead to more adoptions. But shelter reform advocates say the hours will lead to more animals being put down.

Previously, MAS was open Tuesday through Saturday, and now the shelter is open every day of the week. Although the shelter will now be open for a few hours on Sunday and Monday, adoption services will be limited. Visitors may select an animal to adopt on those days, but the animal cannot leave the shelter until Tuesday.

“If they’d like to rescue a pet, and they see a pet they would like, they can acknowledge that on Sunday or Monday. They can come back and pick up the pet on Tuesday. We won’t have any veterinary services [on Sunday or Monday],” Rogers said.

Rogers said the hours were changed to make the shelter more accessible to people — either potential adopters or people looking for lost pets — who cannot get there on weekdays.

But even though the shelter is open more days per week than it previously was, the shelter actually reduced hours on other days and, on Saturday mornings, a couple of hours are reserved for owner-surrenders only. In the end, public access for all services is actually reduced from 34 hours per week to 32 hours per week.

“That change is probably considered minimal by a lot of people,” said Sylvia Cox of Save Our Shelter (SOS), a shelter reform advocacy group. But Cox points out that the new seven-days-a-week hours have caused a new problem for strays that may lead to more animals being euthanized.

Stray animals are held for three business days, the state minimum, before they are euthanized. Cox said, previously, when the shelter was closed on Sundays and Mondays, those days didn’t count toward the three business days.

So if a loose animal was picked up by animal control on a Friday, and it’s owner wasn’t able to get to the shelter until Wednesday, the animal would still be alive at the shelter. With the new hours, that animal picked up on a Friday would be put to sleep before the shelter opens on Tuesday.

“They are only open for three hours on Sunday and Monday, but now those days will count as business days for the stray’s holding period,” Cox said.

Rogers contends that, despite the short hours on Sunday and Monday, people still have ample time to locate their lost pets.

“People will have had the opportunity to look at [pictures of strays] posted on Facebook, to look at [national animal shelter photo website] Pet Harbor, to come to the facility, or to call us,” Rogers said, touting the fact that euthanasia numbers have dropped to their lowest point in years (from around 13,200 animals in 2009 to 7,600 animals in 2013) and adoption numbers have increased.

SOS monitored the shelter’s first weekend with the new hours.

“People were told that they could not adopt any animals. That means that they could not complete the adoption paperwork and pay the adoption fee,” Cox wrote in an email. “There were no clerks working that would process adoptions or reclaims, so even if an owner of a lost pet had found their pet there on Sunday or [Monday], they could not ‘reclaim’ that pet because they could not pay the fees. They would have to wait until Tuesday to actually get their pet, if it’s not killed by then.”

Rogers admitted there were some kinks: “As with all changes in organizations, there were glitches this weekend. We are just like any other company, and we had our share this weekend. It was the first weekend, and all wrinkles will be ironed out.”

Cox said SOS will continue to monitor the shelter’s euthanasia and adoption statistics to see what effect the new hours may have.

New hours for Memphis Animal Services

Sunday     12:00 pm – 3:00 pm   all access

( no owner surrender )

Monday     12:00 pm – 3:00 pm   all access

( no owner surrender )

Tuesday     1:00 pm – 7:00 pm   all access

Wednesday  12:00 pm – 5:00 pm   all access

Thursday    1:00 pm – 7:00 pm   all access

Friday     12:00 pm – 5:00 pm   all access

Saturday    9:00 am – 12:00 pm  

( owner surrender only )

Saturday   12:00 pm – 4:00 pm   all access

Categories
News News Blog

Memphis Animal Services May Cut Hours

Dani Rutherford protests the proposed MAS hour cut on Sunday.

  • Beth Spencer
  • Dani Rutherford protests the proposed MAS hour cuts on Sunday.

Come August, Memphis Animal Services may be open nine fewer hours per week.

Memphis Animal Services director James Rogers made the announcement last week that the city shelter may be cutting its business hours due to budgetary concerns.

The news came during the quarterly public Memphis Animal Services Advisory Board meeting. Rogers said the shelter is looking at changing its hours to noon to 5 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday, and noon to 2 p.m. on Sunday and Monday.

Currently, the shelter is open from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Tuesday and Thursday and from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Wednesday and Friday. It is currently closed on Sundays and Mondays.

Although Rogers cited the city’s budget woes as the reason behind shortened hours, there has been no reduction of staff or staff hours at the shelter. Rogers said that by shortening the shelter’s public hours, he hopes to make time for more spay and neuter surgeries on adoptable animals.

“We are dedicated to making sure we give the best service with the budget we are given,” Rogers said. “What we are trying to do is increase the number of adoptions out. How we do that is have more time for our surgeons to complete adoptions within a certain window.”

Shelter reform advocates at the meeting argued that under the new MAS hours, those with 9-to-5 jobs will not be able to retrieve a lost pet. They said the new hours also give a lost animal less of a window of time to be retrieved before being euthanized.

“MAS … [has] to follow a protocol that keeps an animal alive for at least three business days while the owner tries to locate them,” said Cindy Sanders, co-founder of Community Action for Animals. “Under these new hours, with Sunday and Monday being open for only two hours, if a dog comes in on Friday and the owner can’t make it to the shelter in that small timeframe, the pet could be euthanized on Tuesday.”

The reduced hours at the shelter will also make things harder for Memphis Pets Alive, a local group that posts photos online of shelter animals up for adoption. Volunteers from Pets Alive take the photos every Tuesday from 5 to 7 p.m., but under the new hours, the shelter won’t be open then.

Memphis Pets Alive Executive Director Linda Baxter said her organization had no idea a change in hours was being made. She’s also concerned that MAS’ adoption discount days, Wag Along Wednesday and Yappy Hour, which are held in the evenings, will be affected by the new hours.

“We have more than 5,000 followers on Facebook, and we work rigorously to network our photos of adoptable animals around the country,” Baxter said. “Not only are the highly successful Wag Along Wednesday and the Yappy Hour programs being eliminated under these hours, but the small window that we had to get photos of all available animals at the shelter is now closed.”

The MAS Advisory Board passed a motion recommending the shelter to stay open on Tuesdays and Thursdays until 7 p.m., but the final decision on the hours rests with city Parks and Neighborhoods Director Janet Hooks. She expects to make a decision by mid-August. Sanders and Baxter feel that this is the latest in a series of mistakes made by MAS.

“The lack of knowledge, lack of training, and lack of sympathy has led to a lot of really bad decisions by Mr. Rogers, but this is by far the worst decision he has made,” Sanders said. “The fact that he states it’s a budgetary decision is insulting. He blames this on the budget when he admitted at the meeting that he was not cutting personnel or people’s hours.”

Categories
News News Blog

Memphis Animal Services Enforces Policy Banning Photographs of Certain Animals

These puppies were photographed by Memphis Pets Alive last Tuesday.

  • These puppies were photographed by Memphis Pets Alive last Tuesday. They have since been euthanized.

For more than a year, volunteers with Memphis Pets Alive have photographed every animal in the public viewing areas at Memphis Animal Services (MAS) each Tuesday evening. But last week, volunteer Dani Rutherford was asked to skip over the dogs in the shelter’s “healthy hold” area.

The healthy hold area is where potentially adoptable animals that have been at MAS for less than 72 hours are held. When a stray or owner-surrendered animal comes into the shelter, it is put under a 72-hour review. After 72 hours, if the animal isn’t claimed by an owner, MAS’ staff decides whether or not it will have a chance at adoption or be euthanized.

Since Memphis Pets Alive, a volunteer-run group that tries to market animals at MAS by posting pictures of the animals on Facebook, was formed last year, the technician who escorted the group around the shelter let them photograph those animals under the 72-hour hold.

But now MAS administrator James Rogers claims the group has been violating a policy that bans photographs of animals in the healthy hold area. Rogers was not available for interviews, but he posted a statement about the policy on the city website.

“Sharing photos of animals housed at MAS prematurely may create an unintentional reality of misleading a potential adopter into thinking that an animal is available when the pet may belong to another pet owner,” reads the statement. “MAS views the emotional trauma of such an unfortunate misunderstanding too great a risk and therefore asks rescuers and MAS partners, such as Memphis Pets Alive, to allow the 72-hour holding period to expire before taking and sharing photos of those animals.”

But Linda Baxter, president of Memphis Pets Alive, said they weren’t marketing the pets from the healthy hold area as being up for adoption but rather letting people know the animals are there. In fact, she said there have been cases when people who had lost their pets found them at the shelter through photos posted to the Memphis Pets Alive Facebook page.

“Our Facebook page clearly states that these animals are located at Memphis Animal Services. We do not say they are up for adoption,” Baxter said. “This is just a method of getting these photos out there in the community for people to see them so that, at the end of 72 hours, if the owner hasn’t claimed them, rescue networking can already be done.”

For the animals that may be euthanized at the end of the 72 hours, those few extra days of networking can be crucial.

And according to statistics from Save Our Shelter, a group aiming to reform MAS, the instances of owners reclaiming their pets from the 72-hour hold aren’t very high anyway. In March 2014, MAS took in 879 animals, and only 47 were reclaimed by their owners.

Baxter said, unless the policy is changed, her group will honor it, but rather than photographing animals once a week, they will try to send a volunteer every day to take pictures of animals as they’re released from the 72-hour hold. If those animals are to be euthanized, however, there won’t be much time to market them to adopters before it’s too late.

“This [policy] is going to directly lead to the death of animals,” said Cindy Sanders, co-founder of Community Action for Animals, another shelter reform group. “Mr. Rogers is always saying he is going to make MAS a world-class shelter. This is so counter-productive to being a world-class anything.”

Categories
News News Blog

Full PDF Report of Memphis Animal Services Undercover Investigation

In this week’s Memphis Flyer, we reported on the past actions of Memphis Animal Services field supervisor Glenn Andrews, who was named in the same Memphis Police undercover investigation that netted former MAS employees Frank Lightfoot, Billy Stewart, and Archie Elliot on animal cruelty charges in late 2011 and early 2012.

In the undercover report taken at that time, Andrews is mentioned multiple times — once for kicking a dog and several times for giving animals to fellow employees without following the shelter’s foster protocols. Read the full story here, or view the PDF of the undercover officer’s report below.

Arrington_undercover_report_MAS_investigation.pdf

Categories
News The Fly-By

Undercover Findings

The same Memphis Police Department (MPD) undercover report that netted former Memphis Animal Services (MAS) employees Frank Lightfoot, Billy Stewart, and Archie Elliot on animal cruelty charges for stomping on cats, strangling dogs, and delivering fatal euthanasia injections straight into animals’ hearts in late 2011 and early 2012 names a fourth MAS employee who still works at the facility.

That employee, Glenn Andrews, at that time an interim kennel supervisor, has since been promoted to the role of field supervisor, meaning he oversees the animal control officers. Andrews wasn’t involved in the euthanasia room abuses that Lightfoot, Elliot, and Stewart were charged and convicted of. But the undercover MPD officer working as an animal technician at that time, noted in his report that, on January 4, 2012, Andrews kicked a terrier in the MAS break room, and as the report notes, “the dog wept” as it scurried out of the break room.

“[The undercover officer] observed a foster dog by the name of Penelope, which was in the care of MAS shelter supervisor Glenn Andrews, walking around in the MAS break room,” reads the report. “Glenn Andrews tells the dog named Penelope to come with him. As the dog continued to play and roam around freely, Glenn Andrews appeared to become irritated with the dog’s disregard in his command. Glenn Andrews then walked over to the dog, kicked the dog in the butt with his foot, and stated, ‘Bring your ass on here bitch.'”

MAS Administrator James Rogers, who was hired in February 2012, had not yet begun working at the shelter at the time of the undercover investigation. But Rogers said Andrews has been disciplined for the incident and “that is behind us.” When asked how MAS handles employees who harm the animals in their care, Rogers didn’t give specifics.

“We deal with these things very severely. I can tolerate an employee being late or failing to do part of his job,” Rogers said. “But what will not be tolerated is the abuse of a defenseless animal. That will not happen.”

“I am shocked at this report,” said Jan Courtney, a member of Save Our Shelter, a group dedicated to reforming MAS. Although the report was made in 2011 and 2012, it has only recently come to light. “I’ve met Glenn a few times and never dreamed he was the same Glenn Andrews that I read about in the undercover agent’s report.”

Andrews is also named in the undercover officer’s report for not following protocol with regard to allowing MAS employees to foster animals. On numerous occasions in the report, Andrews is observed allowing employees to take animals home without documenting the terms of fostering or the conditions of their return. MAS has strict policies in place about who can foster, only fostering one animal at a time, and when the animal must be returned.

“Glenn was letting employees take dogs home, and over and over again in the report, it says that there is no follow-up as to what happened to these dogs. These dogs could have been sold as non-aggressive bait dogs in dog-fighting rings. There’s no follow-up,” Courtney said. These incidents occurred around the same time the Memphis Rotary Club released a report stating that some MAS employees had ties to dog-fighting.

On one occasion, the undercover officer watched Andrews load two pit bull puppies into his car and drive away. Another time, an employee named Mario who had taken home a pit bull, told the undercover officer “I just talked to Glenn about it, and he let me get it.”

Rogers said he couldn’t comment on the status of animals that were held at MAS before his time as administrator. But he admitted, from reading the undercover report, that it looked as though foster polices were not followed.

“From reading the report, I think it’s tragic and unfortunate and horrific about what happened then,” Rogers said. “I think people just weren’t aware of policies and procedures. I have held trainings to make sure employees are aware of these policies and procedures to make sure these types of mistakes don’t happen again. And if they do, they will be held accountable.”

Courtney and other members of the animal advocacy community have said they’d like to see Andrews fired. But Rogers, who promoted Andrews to field supervisor a few months ago, said he hasn’t had any problems with Andrews during his time as shelter administrator.

“The kicking event happened before I got here. His behavior, his work ethic has shown that he does love the animals,” Rogers said. “He cares about the animals, and that’s all I want to say about that.”

Categories
News The Fly-By

Death Policy

In early 2012, an undercover investigation netted three Memphis Animal Services employees — Billy Stewart, Archie Elliott III, and Frank Lightfoot Jr. — grossly abusing animals in the euthanasia room. In one instance, Elliott hung a Chow dog by his leash over a sink and injected euthanasia drugs into its heart without sedation.

Memphis Animal Services (MAS) Advisory Board members passed two resolutions last week that, if adopted by the city’s administration, would attempt to prevent such abuse.

The resolutions suggest that all animals being put to sleep at the shelter receive tranquilizing drugs beforehand and that the euthanasia process is filmed by a live-feed camera. They were passed at the board’s quarterly public meeting at the Benjamin L. Hooks Central Library last week.

Because the body is an advisory board, their resolutions don’t immediately become city policy. Instead, they’re meant as suggestions to Division of Parks and Neighborhoods director Janet Hooks, who has the final say in shelter policy.

At the meeting, MAS director James Rogers told the board that, currently, only 10 to 15 percent of the animals that are euthanized receive sedation drugs beforehand.

“Animals that are aggressive, fractious, or are difficult to administer the [euthanasia] solution to are sedated,” Rogers said.

But board chair Stephen Tower, who owns his own veterinary practice, told Rogers that it’s more humane to sedate every animal before he or she is put to sleep.

“At Memphis Animal Clinic, we sedate every animal [that is being euthanized]. It’s easier on the animal, and it also makes it easier on the client. It’s not a shock to the system,” Tower said.

Cindy Sanders, a long-time advocate for shelter reform, agrees: “If Mr. Rogers doesn’t see the need to sedate every animal before they are killed, that is not humane. That means dragging an animal to the euthanasia room and sometimes strapping it down and killing it. And if he doesn’t get that it’s humane for the animals, he should at least do it for his employees. An animal that is not upset and trying to fight is less stressful on the employee.”

It wasn’t clear in the meeting whether or not the budget would allow for the amount of tranquilizing drugs to sedate every animal. But Rogers later stated that with about 7,000 animals euthanized each year, he would estimate the cost to sedate them all at around $18,000.

Sanders said local animal advocates have already discussed ways to fund the purchase of tranquilizers if the city claims it cannot afford them.

The other resolution passed last week suggests that Rogers should install in the euthanasia room live-feed cameras that do not retain recordings. Other areas of the shelter are monitored with cameras that feed into the administration’s offices, but there is not one in the euthanasia room.

“We’ve asked for the camera because it protects the animal, and it protects the workers. If they’re not doing anything wrong, there’s nothing to hide,” said Mary Marjorie Weber Marr of Memphis Pets Alive, a group that finds homes for shelter animals.

The board has been requesting some sort of camera in that room since the trials of Stewart, Elliott, and Lightfoot. But the city has previously denied such requests.

“I think the city will go for the live-feed camera. The city has expressed [in the past] that they do not want a camera in the euthanasia room because the videos can be pulled through open records,” Sanders said. “If that is their only reason, then a live-feed camera is the perfect solution.”