Categories
News News Blog

Memphis City Council Seems Initially Supportive of Crosstown Redevelopment

url.jpeg

The Crosstown Development Team, which is spearheading the redevelopment of the abandoned 1.5 million square foot Sears Crosstown building, presented their plan to transform the former Sears headquarters into a “vertical urban village” to the Memphis City Council’s executive committee today.

The founding partners — ALSAC, the Church Health Center, Methodist Healthcare, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Gestalt Community Schools, Memphis Teacher Residency, and Crosstown Arts — will fill in 600,000 square feet of the building, and the rest will be a combination of residential property, retail, and arts.

The team has asked the city to help them fill in a $15 million funding gap for the $175 million project. Most of the redevelopment is being funded by private contributions, grants, and federal tax credits, but some help is needed from the city. The city’s contribution will pay for blight removal on the site and demolition of some parts of building and parking garage. Robert Lipscomb, Memphis Housing and Community Development and MHA director, said the city plans to find alternative sources of funding that don’t require dipping into the city’s general fund.

“We have not committed to the $15 million. What we have committed to is helping find the $15 million,” Lipscomb said.

Lipscomb proposed the introduction of a new city Center for Policy Change, Design, and Development (also called “The Studio”) that would specialize in sourcing alternative funding for projects that approach city government for assistance. He said he’ll begin meeting with city division directors to discuss Crosstown funding options next week.

Despite the questions concerning how the city will help pay for the project, Memphis City Council members seemed largely supportive.

“It’s critical that we get in-fill development,” said council member Shea Flinn. “We have to do what we have to do or this city will not survive. The fact that such five-star [founding] partners have stepped up for this project is nothing short of a miracle.”

Construction is expected to begin at the Sears Crosstown building later this year with a projected move-in date of 2016.

Categories
Opinion

Confederate Parks: “It’s Done” but It’s Not Over

Forrest

  • Forrest

Could there be a more fiendishly designed story than Confederate parks and General Nathan Bedford Forrest to insure that Memphis forever trips over its own feet (well, maybe the Ford family saga)?

As City Councilman Lee Harris said, “It’s done” as far as renaming the parks. But it’s not over. This story has legs, as we say in the news biz. It also has horses, troops, and a cavalry. There are editorial revisions yet to come for the generic placeholder names, assuming a panel can be assembled that will agree on anything. But the real secret to the longevity of this story is no secret at all. It embraces the themes of race that Memphis loves so well.

If Forrest were alive today he would be coaching football at the University of Alabama. He would have figured out a way to beat Texas A&M, and he would be the darling of ESPN and the bane of reporters if he could not have them all flogged. As my colleague Chris Herrington says, a lot of people ignore the cause and confuse “war hero” with “great general”. Forrest is a war hero to unreconstructed white southerners like the ones writer Tony Horwitz described in his book “Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War.” He is an annoyance or worse to black Memphians for his ties to Fort Pillow and the Ku Klux Klan.

Shelby Foote, the great Memphis Civil War historian and author, wrote a lot about Forrest in Part Three of his trilogy. Forrest, who was in overall command at Fort Pillow, “was widely accused of having committed the atrocity of the war. ‘The Fort Pillow Massacre,’ it was called, then and thereafter, in the North.” Foote wrote that, in fact, Forrest “had done and was doing all he could to end it, having ordered the firing stopped as soon as he saw his troopers swarm into the fort, even though its flag was still flying and a good part of the garrison was still trying to get away.”

Foote died in 2005, shortly before the last (as in last one before this one) Forrest fight was staged. He opposed renaming Forrest Park as well as Confederate Park and Jefferson Davis Park. The statue of Jefferson Davis in Confederate Park (yes) was placed there in 1964 during the heat of the civil rights era and desegregation, the year after Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech in Washington and the year three civil rights workers were murdered in Neshoba County, Mississippi. It is impossible to imagine that its backers were not aware of the context. The Davis statue is more a political statement of those times than a monument to the Civil War. Davis could be in greater danger than Forrest.

If Nathan Bedford Forrest Park was on a less prominent street than Union Avenue, or if the general’s grave had not been moved in 1905 from Elmwood Cemetery where he was originally buried, the general would not get so much attention. But the park, with its equestrian statue of Forrest, is in the heart of the downtown medical center shared by the University of Tennessee and Baptist and Methodist hospitals that is finally showing renewed signs of life and investment. The Forrest grave site is a perfect spot for his admirers, whatever their motives, to put a thumb in the eye of the general’s critics, especially if they happen to be black.

Moving the monument and the graves of Forrest and his wife back to Elmwood, as some have suggested, would be one of the great media events of our time. Reenactors in full uniform would line the streets every foot of the way. Counter-demonstrators would turn out in equal or greater numbers. And every national news report would herald “Memphis Relives The Civil War.”

The City Council will revisit the issue soon. Councilman Myron Lowery has suggested adding a statue of Ida B. Wells to the park, a sort of one-of-ours-and-one-of-yours compromise. The problem with that is that some Memphians may not wish to identify with either one. If you are white, was Forrest “ours”? He belongs to history. His monument and grave have been there for 108 years. Moving them would make the annual Shiloh reenactment in April look like a church picnic. Union Avenue between Manassas and Cleveland is prime real estate that, hopefully, will one day look more like a medical center on the order of Nashville or Jackson, Mississippi. It’s complicated, fiendishly complicated. And not over by a long shot.

Categories
News News Blog

Bill Boyd and Janis Fullilove Duke It Out Over Forrest Park Controversy

Bill Boyd

  • Bill Boyd

Janis Fullilove

  • Janis Fullilove

The Memphis City Council’s parks committee voted to revisit councilman Myron Lowery’s proposal to rename Forrest Park in honor of civil rights pioneer Ida B. Wells in two weeks, following a heated exchange between councilwoman Janis Fullilove and councilman Bill Boyd.

Boyd, chairman of the parks committee, began the meeting by extolling the “virtues” of Nathan Bedford Forrest, the namesake of the controversial city park, after first giving a disclaimer about his interest in the Civil War.

“I’m not a Civil War buff. As far as I’m concerned, the South lost. It’s like when the [University of Memphis] Tigers lose, I don’t read the paper,” Boyd said.

Boyd talked about Forrest’s history as a businessman and proclaimed that, with Forrest’s long history of winning war battles, “he must have been a great general.” Then Boyd went on to tell the council that Forrest “promoted progress for black people in this country after the war.” He claimed that Forrest did not found the Klu Klux Klan (KKK) but rather was elected its leader later on. Boyd also claimed that the KKK was “more of a social club” in its early days and didn’t start doing “bad and horrific things” until it reorganized around the time of the modern-day Civil Rights Movement.

Boyd’s statements were peppered with audible scoffs and an exclamation of “Lord, have mercy” from Fullilove. At one point, Boyd looked at the councilwoman and said, “Keep making faces like you do, Ms. Fullilove,” to which she responded, “Oh, I will.”

After Boyd’s history lesson on Forrest, he allowed Lee Millar of the Sons of Confederate Veterans to speak about the city’s removal of a granite “Forrest Park” sign that his club raised more than $10,000 to have made and installed at the park’s Union Avenue entrance. When Miller mentioned that the city had removed the marker, Fullilove clapped loudly. Miller then asked Fullilove to “hold it down.”

Miller had copies of emails from former city parks director Cindy Buchanan that he believed showed proof that the city had approved the marker. But Maura Black Sullivan, deputy CAO for the city, told council members, “I know those emails look like it was approved, but it was not approved by the administration.”

Sullivan told Miller he would have to gain approval from the Downtown Memphis Commission (DMC) under their sign ordinance, but Miller contended that the DMC only approves business signs, not signs for city parks. That issue will also be revisited in two weeks.

Boyd then adjourned the meeting, but Fullilove had apparently been trying to let Boyd know that she wanted to speak.

“Oh, you just ignored me!” Fullilove exclaimed.

“Oh, I’m sorry,” Boyd said, opening the floor to Fullilove.

“I appreciate how you shared your personal opinion on how great Forrest was to black people,” Fullilove said as she addressed Boyd. “But those are lies.”

Boyd asked Fullilove to share her opinion with him in writing. “Oh, I will,” Fullilove said.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

Reappraisals

Two fresh developments — one local, one national — deserve our comment, because each, in its own way, demonstrates a willingness to think anew about old problems and to do so, as they say, outside the box.

The proposal put forth Monday by Memphis City Council members Jim Strickland and Shea Flinn for a referendum on raising the city’s sales tax rate by a half percent in order to fund pre-K education and to reduce city property taxes is a constructive and timely effort to deal with two undisputed needs. Strickland, known to be contemplating a race for mayor at some future point, has made something of a name for himself as an opponent of new taxation in general and of the city property tax in particular. His case against the latter is that, as he repeated again this week, the city’s property tax rate, the highest in Tennessee, is driving residents outward into Shelby County at-large or even outside the county’s boundaries.

Nor has Strickland been inordinately fond of the sales tax as a revenue device, having opposed it previously both in the city and, in the case of last November’s failed referendum for an increase in the sales tax, at least partly on the perfectly legitimate grounds that a sales tax is by its nature regressive. Strickland has shown admirable flexibility in joining this week with Flinn, whose successful sponsorship last year of a city sales tax referendum proposal was canceled out by the county referendum, which superseded it.

The two council members have also shown a sense of responsibility in arranging for the potential proceeds of a city sales tax increase to be divided between pre-K needs (which would have received substantial funding under the defeated county proposal) and alleviating the city property tax rate.

Danziger

The other governmental initiative we endorse occurred on the national scale, this week, when President Obama chose to risk his political capital by making two controversial  appointments to important cabinet positions — former Republican senator Chuck Hagel as defense secretary and John Brennan, formerly deputy national security adviser, as head of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Both men have made a habit of rendering independent judgment on significant matters of national policy and have resisted peer pressure — which is even more significant in Washington than in high schools across the nation — to play follow-the-leader blindly. Hagel is especially to be commended for his decision, after first supporting George W. Bush’s Iraq folly as a senator, to go public with his opposition to that unnecessary war as contrary to the nation’s strategic interest. That, plus his insistence on an evenhanded policy regarding the long-standing Israel-Palestine dispute, earned Hagel the distrust of many in Congress, especially among his former Republican colleagues. The president knew that he’d have a fight on his hands going in, and, in picking Hagel, he will surely get one.

That Obama has acted on principle regarding an appointee is an encouraging sign to all those who have wondered if the president is too cautious and conciliatory by nature. In this instance, clearly, he has shown himself to be resolute, and we commend him.

Categories
News News Blog

Memphis City Council Discusses Funding for Blue Crush

MPD_Blue_Crush_tactical_platform_at_Central_Station_Memphis_TN_07.jpeg

The Memphis Shelby Crime Commission recently sent a letter to City Hall asking Mayor A C Wharton’s administration to restore funding to the Memphis Police Department’s Blue Crush data-driven policing program. But a handful of Memphis City Council members say they were never made aware of any cuts to the MPD’s budget for Blue Crush.

This morning, the Memphis City Council called on MPD director Toney Armstrong to explain the current state of Blue Crush and whether or not funding cuts had affected use of the successful crime-fighting program.

Armstrong said Blue Crush has remained strong, despite previous comments Armstrong made to media outlets over the past few days. But Armstrong did admit that Blue Crush wasn’t being funded with traditional methods.

Armstrong said budget cuts have forced him trade comp time in lieu of payments for officers who work on Blue Crush details. The funds that could have been used to pay for Blue Crush had to be spent on necessary upgrades to equipment and fingerprinting technology and mandatory hepatitis shots for employees, Armstrong said.

“Yes, I have the funds in my budget [for Blue Crush] but there were other unfunded obligations we had to meet,” Armstrong told the council.

Memphis City Councilman Jim Strickland blamed the Wharton administration for denying the MPD a $2.3 million request for overtime pay for Blue Crush detail.

The police division had requested $245 million for its overall budget, which would have included the money for Blue Crush overtime pay. But the department was given $238 million instead. Strickland accused Wharton of “dismantling” Blue Crush, citing a document from the city’s Zero Based Budgeting Committee that specifically says $2.3 million was cut from “overtime for Blue Crush” for the 2013 budget. Also, a December 2012 email from MPD deputy police chief Jim Harvey specifically stated that the “Blue Crush overtime budget was cut from all precincts.”

Strickland’s data also clearly showed a reduction in Blue Crush details from 2010 to 2012. There were 824 details from July to December 2010, 257 details from the same months in 2011, and 336 details from July to December 2012.

But city CAO George Little, representing the Wharton administration, argued that Blue Crush is not a line item, implying that Armstrong makes the decisions on how to use his budget to fund that program. The council has requested more information from Armstrong, and they will discuss the matter again in a few weeks.

Blue Crush was launched in 2006 by former MPD director Larry Godwin. It utilizes crime data to determine hotspots where police are deployed.

Categories
Opinion

Stadium ADA Funding Gets Council Approval

interior.jpg

A City Council committee approved spending $12 million on ADA compliance at Liberty Bowl Stadium after being warned that if nothing was done the U.S. Justice Department might “shut the stadium down.”

“Not only could they shut the stadium down, they could hold the whole fairgrounds hostage” said Housing and Community Development director Robert Lipscomb. He said that meant forcing the city to make everything at the fairgrounds ADA compliant, but he did not say what will be allowed to be out of compliance.

The 61,000-seat stadium, which is rarely even half full in recent years, added more wheelchair-accessible seats and companion seats a few years ago but not enough to satisfy the Justice Department. The letter of the law would be one percent accessible seating, or 620 seats and 620 companion seats, but the department typically settles for less. Lipscomb said the city bargained with Justice to lower the cost from $40 million to $12 million, which includes some non-seating expenses. A handout said the reduction was due to “new technology and alternate design solutions.” There will be 564 ADA/companion seats. The maximum projected loss of seats is 2,000.

If the full council approves the expenditure as expected, construction will be done between January and August of 2013. Lipscomb said projected new taxes from a proposed Tourism Development Zone (TDZ) to include Cooper-Young and Overton Square would pay the bills. The council will be asked to vote on the TDZ on January 22, 2013. If approved, the city will apply to the state in February and expects to get approval in June. The vision is a youth sports complex.

Committee members asked few questions about the project. Some said they had a “moral obligation” to vote for the proposal. Three people in wheelchairs came to the meeting but did not speak. Interviewed after the meeting, they each said the current wheelchair-accessible seating is inadequate, but they also each said they do not go to games at the stadium.

“There are a lot of people who are not trying to come,” said Louis Patrick. “This is one of those questions of if they build it will they come.”

Categories
News News Blog

Shelby County Wage Theft Ordinance Passes First Reading

Picture_5.png

Shelby County is one step closer to adopting a wage theft ordinance that would make it easier for employees to reclaim lost or stolen wages. The ordinance, proposed by County Commissioner Steve Mulroy, passed on its first reading at the Shelby County Commission’s general government committee meeting today.

Kyle Kordsmeier of the Workers Interfaith Network was present at today’s committee meeting to stand in support of the ordinance; Herbi-Systems owner Kenny Crenshaw of “Lemme Kill Your Weeds” fame showed up to say, “lemme kill your ordinance.”

The county ordinance is scheduled to go up for its second reading next Monday. But the real test will be next Tuesday, when an identical ordinance, sponsored by Memphis City Councilman Myron Lowery, goes up for its first reading at city council. Because the Shelby County ordinance would only cover unincorporated Shelby County, the same ordinance must also pass in the city council for it to have an effect on wage theft in Memphis.

Categories
News News Blog

Memphis Bus Riders Union Meeting To Discuss Gas Tax Referendum

MATA_Plus_bus_Memphis_TN_01.jpg

Members of the Memphis Bus Riders Union are gathering on Saturday, August 11th to discuss the recent gas tax referendum approved by the Memphis City Council. The referendum would ask voters to support or refuse adding a one-cent tax to every gallon of gasoline sold within city limits, with the proceeds going to Memphis Area Transit Authority (MATA).

The Bus Riders Union meeting, which will take place from noon to 2 p.m. at the Memphis Center for Independent Living on 1633 Madison Ave., was called because many of its members had concerns regarding the referendum’s content, which some consider to be vague.

“We’re going to be looking at the gas tax proposal and discussing it with the membership to decide if the group will get involved with this issue,” said member Brad Watkins. “We know that there’s a lot of support for it but we have a lot of questions about the language, the oversight to ensure those funds are going to go where we, and a lot of the members of the MATA board, agree that it should go to.”

The city council voted on Tuesday, August 7th in favor of placing the referendum on the November 6th ballot.

Watkins said the organization agrees that there needs to be a dedicated funding source for MATA but are seeking some clarification before they support it.

“In this era of city budgets, where funding comes and goes arbitrarily, this dedicated source of funding would ensure MATA could become the best public transit system that it could be, which is what we hope for,” Watkins said. “But we want to start a community-wide discussion on this to ensure that the gas tax, if passed by the voters, does what it’s supposed to.

The Memphis Bus Riders Union, founded in February, is a grassroots organization that seeks to ensure the needs and priorities of MATA customers are the company’s highest priority.

Categories
Opinion

Council Critics of Half-Cent Sales Tax Bump Make (A) Sense or (B) No Sense

Jim Strickland

  • Jim Strickland

Memphis City Councilmen Jim Strickland and Kemp Conrad voted against the proposed half-cent increase in the local sales tax, which will now be placed on the ballot as a referendum question in November.

Kemp Conrad

  • Kemp Conrad

Conrad and Strickland say that government cuts should come first and the sales tax is regressive because it taxes rich and poor equally. Both are stand-up guys who will speak truth to power. But this time their principled stand looks more like grandstanding to me.

Raising the local sales tax from 2.25 percent to 2.75 percent would increase the total sales tax in Tennessee to 9.75 percent. On $1000 worth of purchases, that’s an additional $5. That’s the cost of a sandwich or a couple of lottery tickets, a state enterprise that is heavily supported by sales in convenience stores in low-income neighborhoods so that middle-class kids can get college scholarships.

Both locals and visitors pay the sales tax. If the suburbs get their municipal school districts, then there would be no tax advantage to either side because the suburbs propose to fund schools with a half-cent sales tax increase. This is the right tax at the right time.

Memphis is facing a revenue shortfall when property appraisals are adjusted next year. The last countywide reappraisal occurred before the recession and the crash in home values. The sales tax and the property tax are Tennessee’s chosen methods of raising big money for government. Mayor A C Wharton and a majority of City Council members favor putting the sales tax increase on the ballot.

What were Strickland and Conrad thinking? Here’s an abbreviated summary of my conversations with them:

Me: “Five bucks on $1,000 worth of purchases. What’s the big deal?
Strickland: “It’s regressive. We are taxing food and prescription drugs, and this would increase the tax 5 percent. The richest and poorest person pay the same percentage.”
Conrad: “Tell that to the person making $20,000 a year. The sales tax is already a major driver of people going to Arkansas and Mississippi to shop. This would only exacerbate it.”

Me: “If it’s regressive then why not support an alternative that makes a difference like an income tax or payroll tax?”
Strickland: “It is illegal, under state law, we cannot do payroll tax toll roads or any of that.”
Conrad: “You and I both know that is not realistic. But I would not support it anyway.”

Me: “All we have for big money is sales tax and property tax. This would bring in $47 million.”
Strickland: “If we bring in $47 million it will remove all pressure to right-size government. The progress we have been making will completely disappear.”
Conrad: “We have a spending issue, not a revenue issue. Without reforming city government we will bore through this $47 million or $50 million or whatever it is in a couple of years. This stuff about offsetting it by reducing property taxes is bogus.”

Me: “The lottery is regressive, and it is state sanctioned and state marketed.”
Strickland: “It’s voluntary.”

Me: “Is it politically impossible for you to vote against any tax increase small or large?”
Conrad: “That has zero to do with my vote. I am not a career politically-oriented person. If the mayor would come down and lobby as hard for some common sense reform we could really turn the city around. I have never seen him work so hard as he did to maximize the most regressive tax.”

Me: “What is your guess on the outcome?”
Strickland: “If it passes there will be 13 different opinions about how to spend the money. But I don’t think the public is going to vote for it.”
Conrad: “I think it is going to be rejected overwhelmingly. If this fails, it means people want a leaner and more efficient government.”

Categories
Opinion

Council Searches for New Sources of Money

fireworks.jpg

It was late Tuesday afternoon, and the City Council was hoping to knock off a little early to get the jump on the Fourth of July holiday, but instead members wound up moving ahead on some taxing matters — as in sales taxes, gas taxes, and “voluntary” taxes on nonprofits and businesses that get tax breaks.

All of the matters are still in preliminary stages, so the votes Tuesday merely moved them a little closer to up-or-down final votes, or “third readings” as they are called. But the council seems to be serious about finding new revenue sources to balance the budget and keep from making cuts in services and employees.

Here’s a look at each possibility.

Councilman Shea Flinn, with the backing of Mayor A C Wharton, wants to give Memphis voters the option to raise the local sales tax from 2.25 cents to 2.75 cents, which would make the total sales tax 9.75 cents. Voters would have to approve it in the November election, but for that to happen, the council would have to take further action. On Tuesday the second reading of the measure was delayed. Flinn said he is fairly confident that the proposal will make it to the voters. But he also knows that some of his fellow members will not vote for it because they fear being branded as “pro-tax” which could make them vulnerable to future political foes.

Councilman Ed Ford Jr. wants to give voters another tax option — a one penny increase in the gasoline tax, with the increase dedicated to budget expenses for public transportation. This also has to pass council a couple more times, and there is some question whether the money can be given straight to MATA, which already gets millions of dollars a year in city funding. Like the sales tax, the gas tax has some appeal because it hits non-Memphians as well as Memphians, and is a “voluntary” tax to the extent that purchases can be controlled.

Councilmen Janice Fullilove and Lee Harris think the city should look at nonprofits and companies in Memphis that get tax abatements through the PILOT or payment-in-lieu-of-taxes programs. PILOTs freeze taxes at pre-development levels for a certain number of years. The nonprofits, Fullilove said, “use the same services” as tax-paying individuals and businesses. Boston and other cities have successfully persuaded “eds and meds” to make voluntary payments to help raise city revenue. The proposal is in the early stages in Memphis. A committee will be formed, but the idea has popular appeal as evidenced by the union lobbying for it at the unified school board meeting last week. The council won’t have leverage until the nonprofits and PILOT businesses come before it seeking something. Then we will see who’s serious.

Councilman Kemp Conrad wants members to approve an ordinance that would amend the city charter to require the mayor and council to adopt a five-year strategic business plan and a six-year consolidated operating and capital improvements budget. Wharton has floated a similar proposal, which is a favorite of business group advisers. The problem is that politics is always more or less a seat-of-the-pants operation. And over the years the council has yielded much of its authority to quasi-public agencies like the Riverfront Development Corporation to take over former city operations. Tax-cutters on the council regularly fall in line when the such agencies come around for their annual review and subsidy.

Give the council credit for this: On a day when many Memphians were leaving work early, they stayed well into the evening to do the people’s business. They voted against a special use permit for a pawn shop at Perkins and Knight Arnold, which is a serious issue for members and their constituents in urban districts. Harold Collins was especially blunt in his opposition, comparing pawn shops to blight.

The council had a healthy discussion of the dreaded car inspection stations. There is strong “feds be damned” sentiment to give all Memphians, not just poor people, a break on the annoying and expensive emissions-related “check engine” light breakdown. Inspection, of course, is as much an expenditure of time as well as money, and both investments can be considerable if the light-related problem has to be fixed in order to pass. Conrad spoke for many of us when he said “Anything we can do to get our citizens out of this ridiculous process, I’m for it.”

Finally, in the most touching moments of the meeting, the council and onlookers gave a very enthusiastic standing ovation to two people: Dr. Mary McDonald for her 35 years of stellar work with the Catholic Schools of Memphis and Deandre Brown and the members of Lifeline to Success, winners of the 2012 Large Group Volunteer of the Year Award. Some 25 members of the “Blight Patrol” in Frayser, all of them wearing lime-green t-shirts, came to the meeting and did a rousing group recitation of their “I am not my crime” coda, as Brown barked out the cadence. Members of the team, including Brown, are former criminal offenders looking to restart their lives in a Christian program working in one of the toughest parts of Memphis.

“You are the model for what this country should be looking for in a second-chance program,” said Council Chairman Bill Morrison.

Brown said he is determined to make Frayser “a nice place to live.” For more on his story, here is a Flyer interview done last year. Also see the group’s inspiring video on YouTube with the lines “I gotta clean up, what I messed up, I’m starting my life over again.”

Fine organization and good thought for everyone on this Fourth of July.