Categories
Editorial Opinion

Jim Eikner

Memphis lost one of its finest citizens last week — Jim Eikner. Lawyer, onetime prosecutor, actor, singer, painter, wit, public speaker par excellence, he was, among many other things, the on-air presence and golden voice that sustained WKNO, Memphis’ public broadcasting station, for decades. He was a blend of dignity, service, and wit who, even before his ascension in the current year to the presidency of the Rotary Club of Memphis, was the embodiment of the club and its motto, Service Before Self. And no Memphis Rotarian can forget — or emulate — his erstwhile weekly news reviews that for years, faithful to Aristotle, always both amused and instructed.

Jim’s death was attributed to heart failure, though it is misleading to leave it at that, since his heart — in the metaphorical sense, anyhow — never failed us. Indeed, as we learned, even after he was disconnected medically from his artificial life supports, his heart kept beating for some time before subsiding into its final, reluctant rest, as if to remind us that he intended to remain with us in spirit.

We learned upon his death that Jim was 82, and, as we thought about that, it certainly made sense. He had the gravitas that comes with such age. But in another sense, he was still Jimmy Eikner of Messick High School, a youth who was equal parts sober-sided and impish. He stayed that way throughout his time at Southwestern at Memphis (now Rhodes College) and at the University of Tennessee Law School and throughout his adult career as a full-time Renaissance man.

It was ironic that Jim Eikner should leave us on the very cusp of spring— he whose wardrobe and manner always distilled the essence of that season. But it was appropriate that, after one of the bleakest local winters on record, the weather should relent this week after his death, enough so to allow several of us to fetch our own cords and seersuckers from their hiding places, in his honor.

One of Jim’s memorable roles as an actor was that of Norman in On Golden Pond, the octogenarian who in the course of the play comes to terms with the generations that are preparing to succeed him. Eikner himself never had to play catch-up with anybody of any era. He was a man for all times and an inspiration to them, as well, and will not stop being that.

The one thing we will miss the most about Jim Eikner is that voice of his, something that he himself was so dismissive about, referring to it as mere nasality, but which we knew to be an uncommonly mellow instrument, whose silky baritone expressed all the tones and nuances of life like nobody else’s. But it will still be there, in the mind’s ear, to fill such uncomfortable silences as come along.
These remarks were given at Tuesday’s Downtown Rotary Club by Jackson Baker.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

Shelby County and Memphis “In the Zone”

In what amounted to a quickie course in “City/County Planning for Dummies,” Josh Whitehead, director of the joint Office of Planning and Development (OPD), treated members of the Rotary Club of Memphis to a dissertation on

Tuesday that happened also to contain a few history lessons.

Whitehead sketched the history of planning organizations in Shelby County, from 1921, when, as he put it, we “asked the General Assembly” for permission to establish the first urban zoning body in Tennessee and perhaps anywhere. There were other steps along the way to the full-blown regulatory authorities we possess today in the form of the OPD and the Land Use Control Board, along with such associated bodies as the Landmarks Commission and the Downtown Memphis Commission, the entire network overlaid (at least in theory) by the county’s Unified Development Code.

These days, as Whitehead pointed out, the General Assembly has its own paraphernalia of codes, commissions, and regulations related to who can build what and where and when that can happen — all this gauged to the population base of a given area. To some extent this over-arching legal infrastructure is consistent with what prevails in Shelby County and to some extent it isn’t. There has been at least one judicial decision holding that private acts, of the sort that created the zoning apparatus of Memphis and Shelby County, outweigh the requirements of public (i.e., statewide) acts on a given zoning matter. The disconjunction, as Whitehead points out, can make for some nice paydays for members of the legal profession.

But that’s only half the problem. Even within the writ of local zoning authority there are numerous irregularities — some planned, some given special dispensation by zoning bodies or the courts, some inherited, and some patently illegal. And there is the contemporary phenomenon of “planned developments,” whereby proposals are allowed to circumvent zoning rules via the concurrence and consultation of regulatory bodies and local legislative entities.

By and large the whole mish-mash was made to seem like blueprints for the most complicated Rube Goldberg device ever undertaken (especially when Whitehead, in his presentation at Rotary, flashed a slide showing, from overhead, a section of Midtown and the myriad of overlapping, color-coded zoning classifications that governed that relatively limited piece of turf.

For those of us who, for business or pleasure, wander into deliberations of the Memphis City Council or the Shelby County Commission or any of of the several smaller jurisdictions in the county, not to mention those of the zoning bodies mentioned above, Whitehead’s lecture was an impressive reminder of just how complicated zoning matters are and how much balancing of established regulations and competing interests is required to make decisions that, on the surface, would seem deceptively simple.

There was a time when it was otherwise — especially in that lengthy pre-World War Two period when Shelby County more or less did what it wanted, for better or for worse, and pioneered, essentially unchecked, in the art of urban planning. That was back in the heyday of “Boss” Crump, who governed Shelby County and also, as Whitehead noted, “ruled the state.”

Things are more complicated now but also more flexible. That’s the nature of trade-offs.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

Good News From Josh Pastner

Summer just got here, but everybody looks ahead these days, and it wasn’t much of a surprise to see University of Memphis Basketball Coach Josh Pastner turn up at a Memphis Rotary Club luncheon on Tuesday to offer some

backward glances — and forward guesses regarding the forthcoming version of the Tiger roundballers.

What was a surprise of sort was Pastner’s own new look. Working with the UM athletic department’s strength coach, he has packed some new bulk onto a frame that always looked small in those TV shots of him standing by his players. When club president Berje Yacoubian confessed to a sense of surprise about the Tiger coach’s new dimensions, Pastner aw-shucksed it off as what happens when folks are used to seeing you surrounded by athletes who stand 6’10” or so.

In any case, the newly configured Pastner, 6’1″ himself, and weighing some 210 pounds, looks like an NFL linebacker. And that may be what T.S. Eliot called an “objective correlative” of some other changes going on in Tigerland. Pastner told the Rotarians that during the spring and summer, he has doubled down on discipline for his players.

Pastner has always been willing to bench a player for substandard performance (or even to suspend one for improper attitude, like audibly cursing on the floor). But now he’s adopting a tactic that any military veteran might remember from boot camp. When one player makes an avoidable error, he will no longer be disciplined as one errant individual: The entire unit will undergo some sort of corrective discipline. That’s how a drill instructor molds a team, and that’s how Pastner intends to do it from now on.

He confessed to being as conscious as the rest of us that the Tigers have a history, under his regime and previous ones, of falling just short. “We haven’t yet won a national championship,” Pastner observed, telling the Rotarians that something like that is what it may take for the team — and the school — to hold its own in the next inevitable reshuffling of athletic conferences.

Two things that separate winners from losers these days, Pastner confided, are the ability to hit the three-point shot and the ability to make free throws. (Anyone who remembers that agonizing 2008 loss to Kansas in the NCAA finals needs no reminder of that.)

But the most important revelation that came from Pastner on Tuesday was probably a surprise to most who heard it: The team is already a champion in the academic prowess of its players, as measured in grade-point-average and percentage of degrees earned. The Top Four, nationally. He and they deserve our congratulations.