Categories
Opinion The Last Word

The Basement Tapes: One Millennial’s Musings on Money 

At the beginning of this month, my wife and I made a move, one that we hope will go some way to improving our fortunes. We’re joining the not-insignificant number of millennial adults who have moved back in with their parents. 

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, more than 50 percent of millennials who have moved out of their parents’ home have, at some point, moved back. That was a number I never thought to find myself in, though. That particular safety net didn’t exist for me until I got married. Both my parents live with their respective sisters, so to move “back home” was something of a logistical challenge, not that it was exactly an outcome I had hoped for, either. So, with my wife’s Bonus Mom, as she calls herself, renting her basement to us for the family discount, an amount not unlike pre-Covid-inflation rental rates, I recognize the privilege I have. Not everyone has a safe place to fall back to after they’ve fallen on their face.

Still, despite how fortunate we are, it rankles that our economic reality turned on the whims of a South African billionaire and his team of underqualified coders at DOGE. Their cuts to funding for federal agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation spelled doom for the future of science research in this country, true, and also for my wife’s and my jobs. It’s not so much that a sudden change in national policy so drastically affected my household that bothers me. After all, we are all subject to changes in the global climate; new trends and technologies change how we interact and consume, and livelihoods are affected. No, it’s the frivolous nature of DOGE’s cuts that gall me, how completely devoid of merit the entire organization is, how shortsighted their so-called “savings” will prove to be, and how much harm has been done, now and far into the future. 

I can’t help but wonder how many other American citizens are making similar moves, just so a self-obsessed confidence trickster can create the illusion of fiscal responsibility and Art of the Deal-like economic wizardry — all while adding to the national debt and simultaneously eroding the nation’s few bulwarks against future threats, such as climate disaster, severe storms, and disease. Are there former NASA scientists navigating a terrifying new medical diagnosis while also figuring out what insurance they now qualify for? Are there former national parks employees moving themselves and their kids into smaller apartments? Surely, there must be. I can say for certain, there are two new parents with a new baby and new (low-paying) jobs who have just moved into a parent’s basement while they work to save and strive for more secure careers. 

Life goes on for us average Joes, as our leaders throw themselves military parades, order illegal air strikes, do the trade-war tango with our allies and enemies, and bully local governments into sucking up to them. Shouldn’t our national policies and budgetary goals strive to make life safer and more secure for the vast majority of us? Businesses fail, droughts and floods and blizzards happen; no one is perfectly protected from life’s buffets. But that statistic I mentioned earlier — that more than half of millennials now live or have lived with their parents after moving out — that doesn’t seem like an indicator of a healthy and thriving economic system. Unless, that is, it’s meant to work more like a casino slot machine than anything else. It’s paying out, dummy — just not for you. 

I had hoped to litter this feature with statistics and quotes from reputable sources. I wanted to add context about the minimum wage, tax structures over time, etc. But to be perfectly honest, I’ve got work at a temp job soon, boxes to unpack, and probably a baby diaper to change. So take these words with a grain of salt, and be careful what you read on the internet (and in print). Just because someone has a fancy byline in a newspaper doesn’t mean they don’t live in their wife’s step-mother’s basement. 

Jesse Davis is a former Flyer staffer; he writes a monthly Books feature for Memphis Magazine. His opinions, such as they are, have literally never ordered avocado toast. Not even once. 

Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Film Retrospective: Batman (1989)

This week, 25 years ago, I was a knot of anticipation. The thing I wanted to see more than any other thing, the Batman film, was at last coming out. I’m not saying I wanted to see Batman more than I wanted to see any other movie at the time; I mean I had never been so eager to partake in anything, ever. In retrospect, I haven’t been so excited for the release of any other piece of pop culture. I think the only things to surpass it are real-life greatnesses: kissing a girl, getting married, the birth of my children. Seriously. (Where are you going? Come back!)

I was so excited in part because I loved and devoured the Batman comics. The character appealed to my maturing sense of identity and growing individualism. He was no less human than I was — he wasn’t bitten by a radioactive spider, exposed to cosmic or gamma rays, or orphaned from an alien planet — infinitely relatable to this here shy little nerd. What made Bruce Wayne into Batman was nothing but a common traumatic childhood; granted, my sheltered, suburban upbringing was far from harrowing. But, if you stabbed Batman with a sword-umbrella, he’d bleed like anyone else, and he became successful by dint of willpower alone. Plus, what kid doesn’t want to hear that it’s the monsters who should be afraid of the dark?

Michael Keaton in Batman

The movie Batman hit me square in the face, at age 13, the summer before 8th grade, a seminal moment at a seminal age. It marked my transition from an artless, prepubescent consumer of whatever happened to be in front of me to a relatively thoughtful observer of craft and commercialism. The coming of age was my (forgive me) Bat Mitzvah.

Batman felt like the first movie that was made for me. I pined for news in the build-up to its release — this was, of course, long before the internet, a lonely place of dying that left one starved for information. I watched Entertainment Tonight routinely, hoping for clips or updates; I scoured for showbiz tidbits in the Appeal section of The Commercial Appeal — this was pre-Captain Comics. Entertainment Weekly didn’t exist yet. MTV ran a “Steal the Batmobile” contest; I obsessed over the glimpses of the movie the promos and commercials showed. When the video to Prince’s “Batdance” premiered in advance of the film’s release, I was devastated: It didn’t show any scenes from the movie.

Finally, Batman came out. I saw it at Highland Quartet, the first showing on the first day. It napalmed me. I could not have loved it more. It buried itself in my DNA instantly. I bought the Danny Elfman score on tape and wore it out. To this day, it’s my all-time favorite soundtrack. I waited on tenterhooks for the box office results, finally delivered (at least, in my recollection) in the voice of Chris Connelly on an MTV News segment: Batman had a huge opening weekend. I felt personally vindicated. (As I said, I was a nerd.)

Batman was my first movie review. I wrote it for myself, in a journal kept in a spiral school notebook that has been, sadly, lost to time. After some attic digging, I did unearth the second volume of my journal, running from August 1989 to December 1990. Included within is my first ever movies list, presented here unadulterated:

Top 15 Movies, 6-29-90, 1:41-1:46 a.m.

1. Batman

2. The Hunt for Red October

3. RoboCop 2

4. Dirty Rotten Scoundrels

5. Gremlins 2

6. The Jerk

7. RoboCop

8. Die Hard

9. The Terminator

10. Top Gun

11. The Blues Brothers

12. The Running Man

13. Young Guns

14. Blind Date

15. Parenthood

Looking back, there are plenty of things to commend in Tim Burton’s film. His German Expressionistic sensibilities (and Anton Furst production design) perfectly reflect the shadows of the mind cast within by Bruce Wayne’s psychological scars; Michael Keaton is surprisingly good as Batman; Jack Nicholson is terrific as the Joker. Its reputation was only burnished by the disappointments that followed, with the 1990s sequels Batman Returns, Batman Forever, and Batman & Robin.

However, in 2005, with Batman Begins, Christopher Nolan rendered the 1989 Batman irrelevant — astonishingly, but no less substantively. Nolan and Christian Bale made a grown-up adaptation — textually moodier, with characters more realistically beat down by life’s injustices — that thoroughly neutered the Burton/Keaton “original.”

The one thing missing from Nolan’s update was the childhood sense of awe and joy that I see bursting from the 1989 film. It’s not really Batman Begins‘ fault. How could it have possibly contained and inspired all that life-changing ecstasy? After all, I wasn’t there to provide it.